This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 106/14/1853    most recent 01.CIR.0000031802.58532.04v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhuang, S. Articles by Mazgalev, T. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zhuang, S. Articles by Mazgalev, T. N. Related Collections Contractile function Electrophysiology Animal models of human disease Arrythmias-basic studies

(Circulation. 2002;106:1853.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.

Basic Science Reports

Ventricular Rate Control by Selective Vagal Stimulation Is Superior to Rhythm Regularization by Atrioventricular Nodal Ablation and Pacing During Atrial Fibrillation

Shaowei Zhuang, MD^*; Youhua Zhang, MD, PhD^*; Kent A. Mowrey, MS; Jianbo Li, PhD; Tomotsugu Tabata, MD, PhD; Don W. Wallick, PhD; Zoran B. Popovi, MD; Richard A. Grimm, DO; Andrea Natale, MD; Todor N. Mazgalev, PhD

From the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (J.L.), The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

Correspondence to Todor N. Mazgalev, PhD, Research Institute FF1-02, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195. E-mail mazgalt{at}ccf.org

Background— Selective atrioventricular nodal (AVN) vagal stimulation (AVN-VS) has emerged as a novel strategy for ventricular rate (VR) control in atrial fibrillation (AF). Although AVN-VS preserves the physiological ventricular activation sequence, the resulting rate is slow but irregular. In contrast, AVN ablation with pacemaker implantation produces retrograde activation (starting at the apex), with regular ventricular rhythm. We tested the hypothesis that, at comparable levels of VR slowing, AVN-VS provides hemodynamic benefits similar to those of ablation with pacemaker implantation.

Methods and Results— AVN-VS was delivered to the epicardial fat pad that projects parasympathetic nerve fibers to the AVN in 12 dogs during AF. A computer-controlled algorithm adjusted AVN-VS beat by beat to achieve a mean ventricular RR interval of 75%, 100%, 125%, or 150% of spontaneous sinus cycle length. The AVN was then ablated, and the right ventricular (RV) apex was paced either irregularly (i-RVP) using the RR intervals collected during AVN-VS or regularly (r-RVP) at the corresponding mean RR. The results indicated that all 3 strategies improved hemodynamics compared with AF. However, AVN-VS resulted in significantly better responses than either r-RVP or i-RVP. i-RVP resulted in worse hemodynamic responses than r-RVP. The differences among these modes became less significant when mean VR was slowed to 150% of sinus cycle length.

Conclusions— AVN-VS can produce graded slowing of the VR during AF without destroying the AVN. It was hemodynamically superior to AVN ablation with either r-RVP or i-RVP, indicating that the benefits of preserving the physiological antegrade ventricular activation sequence outweigh the detrimental effect of irregularity.

Key Words: fibrillation • atrioventricular node • vagus nerve • ablation • hemodynamics

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Olshansky, H. N. Sabbah, P. J. Hauptman, and W. S. Colucci Parasympathetic Nervous System and Heart Failure: Pathophysiology and Potential Implications for Therapy Circulation, August 19, 2008; 118(8): 863 - 871. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Armour Potential clinical relevance of the 'little brain' on the mammalian heart Exp Physiol, February 1, 2008; 93(2): 165 - 176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Zhang, H. Yamada, S. Bibevski, S. Zhuang, K. A. Mowrey, D. W. Wallick, S. Oh, and T. N. Mazgalev Chronic Atrioventricular Nodal Vagal Stimulation: First Evidence for Long-Term Ventricular Rate Control in Canine Atrial Fibrillation Model Circulation, November 8, 2005; 112(19): 2904 - 2911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Melenovsky, I. Hay, B. J. Fetics, B. A. Borlaug, A. Kramer, J. M. Pastore, R. Berger, and D. A. Kass Functional impact of rate irregularity in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2005; 26(7): 705 - 711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Tabata, R. A. Grimm, J. Asada, Z. B. Popovic, H. Yamada, N. L. Greenberg, D. W. Wallick, Y. Zhang, S. Zhuang, K. A. Mowrey, et al. Determinants of LV diastolic function during atrial fibrillation: beat-to-beat analysis in acute dog experiments Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2004; 286(1): H145 - H152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Yamada, D. O. Martin, K. A. Mowrey, N. L. Greenberg, and D. W. Wallick Effects of coupled pacing on cardiac performance during acute atrial tachycardia and fibrillation: an old therapy revisited for a new reason Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2003; 285(6): H2630 - H2638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. G. Krohn, S. Zhuang, Y. Zhang, K. A. Mowrey, T. Tabata, D. W. Wallick, Z. B. Popovic, R. A. Grimm, A. Natale, T. N. Mazgalev, et al. Inappropriate Use of Atrioventricular Nodal Vagal Stimulation in Atrial Fibrillation * Response Circulation, April 8, 2003; 107 (13): e90 - e90. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. DiMarco Selective Vagal Stimulation for Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, October 1, 2002; 106(14): 1746 - 1747. [Full Text] [PDF]