This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tübler, T. Articles by Schofer, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tübler, T. Articles by Schofer, J. Related Collections Peripheral vascular disease Carotid Stenosis Embolic stroke Primary and Secondary Stroke Prevention Angioplasty and Stenting Transient Ischemic Attacks

(Circulation. 2001;104:2791.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.

Clinical Investigation and Reports

Balloon-Protected Carotid Artery Stenting

Relationship of Periprocedural Neurological Complications With the Size of Particulate Debris

Thilo Tübler, MD; Michael Schlüter, PhD; Olaf Dirsch, MD; Horst Sievert, MD;; Ilka Bösenberg, MD; Eberhard Grube, MD; Jürgen Waigand, MD; Joachim Schofer, MD

From the Center for Cardiology and Vascular Intervention (T.T., M.S., J.S.), Hamburg; the Department of Pathology (O.D.), University Hospital, Essen; the Cardiovascular Center Bethanien (H.S., I.B.), Frankfurt; the Heart Center Siegburg (E.G.), Siegburg; and Franz Volhard Clinic, Humboldt University (J.W.), Berlin, Germany.

Correspondence to Joachim Schofer, MD, Othmarscher Kirchenweg 168, 22763 Hamburg, Germany. E-mail schofer{at}center-for-cardiology.de

Background— Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been advocated as an alternative to endarterectomy. To prevent cerebral atheroembolism during CAS, distal balloon occlusion of the target artery increasingly is employed during the procedure. A correlation of the size of captured particles with the incidence of periprocedural neurological complications (PNCs) has not been attempted.

Methods and Results— In a 4-center, phase-1 trial, 54 patients (46 men; age, 69±8 years) underwent 58 CAS procedures using the PercuSurge GuardWire system for distal protection. Aspirated debris was sent for histological/cytological analysis. Stent placement was successful in all cases. Mean balloon occlusion time was 10.4±4.0 minutes (range, 3.0 to 22.0 minutes). Three patients (5.2%) experienced PNCs: 1 prolonged reversible ischemic neurological deficit that resolved in 48 hours, 1 stroke, and 1 transient ischemic attack. Relevant particles (those with an area 10 000 µm²) were found in 48 aspirates (83%). The median number of particles, their maximum diameter, and their maximum area were all significantly higher in the aspirates obtained during procedures associated with PNCs than in aspirates obtained during procedures not associated with PNCs. However, pronounced overlap in the distributions (PNCs versus no PNCs) of the number and maximum diameter of particles precluded any predictive inferences. In contrast, a maximum particle area >800 000 µm² (>0.8 mm²) was associated with a 60% chance of having a PNC.

Conclusions— Despite balloon protection, PNCs occurred in 5.2% of patients who underwent CAS procedures. The maximum area of aspirated particles seems to be an indicator of increased risk for PNCs.

Key Words: carotid arteries • embolism • angioplasty • stents

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Pinero, A. Gonzalez, E. Martinez, A. Mayol, E. Rafel, J.R. Gonzalez-Marcos, F. Moniche, A. Cayuela, and A. Gil-Peralta Volume and Composition of Emboli in Neuroprotected Stenting of the Carotid Artery AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2009; 30(3): 473 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Asakura, K. Kawaguchi, H. Sakaida, N. Toma, S. Matsushima, K. Kuraishi, H. Tanemura, Y. Miura, M. Maeda, and W. Taki Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in carotid angioplasty and stenting with protection by the reversed carotid arterial flow. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2006; 27(4): 753 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Gorog, R. A. Foale, and I. Malik Distal Myocardial Protection During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: When and Where? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 18, 2005; 46(8): 1434 - 1445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Vos, J. C. van den Berg, S. M. P. G. Ernst, M. J. Suttorp, T. T. C. Overtoom, H. W. Mauser, O. J. M. Vogels, H. P. M. van Heesewijk, F. L. Moll, Y. van der Graaf, et al. Carotid Angioplasty and Stent Placement: Comparison of Transcranial Doppler US Data and Clinical Outcome with and without Filtering Cerebral Protection Devices in 509 Patients Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 493 - 499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. E. Rodriguez and L. Leon Current Status of Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, June 1, 2004; 16(2): 111 - 119. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. A. Gray A cardiologist in the carotids J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 5, 2004; 43(9): 1602 - 1605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Schluter, T. Tubler, J. C. Steffens, D. G. Mathey, and J. Schofer Focal ischemia of the brain after neuroprotected carotid artery stenting J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 17, 2003; 42(6): 1007 - 1013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Liistro and C. Di Mario Carotid artery stenting Heart, August 1, 2003; 89(8): 944 - 948. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kastrup, K. Groschel, H. Krapf, B. R. Brehm, J. Dichgans, and J. B. Schulz Early Outcome of Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting With and Without Cerebral Protection Devices: A Systematic Review of the Literature Stroke, March 1, 2003; 34(3): 813 - 819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. S. Roubin Angioplasty and Stenting Should Not Be Restricted to Clinical Trials Stroke, October 1, 2002; 33(10): 2520 - 2522. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Schluter, T. Tubler, D. G. Mathey, and J. Schofer Feasibility and efficacy of balloon-based neuroprotection during carotid artery stenting in a single-center setting J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 4, 2002; 40(5): 890 - 895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]