(Circulation. 2001;104:1153.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From Harvard-Thorndike Institute of Electrophysiology, Cardiovascular Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to Mark E. Josephson, MD, Director of the Harvard-Thorndike Electrophysiology Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 333 Brookline Ave, RW453, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail mjoseph2{at}bidmc.harvard.edu
Background The terms counterclockwise (CC) and clockwise (C) atrial flutter (Afl) are used to describe right atrial activation around the tricuspid valve in the left anterior oblique view. The manner in which the left atrium is activated, as reflected by coronary sinus (CS) recordings, has not been systematically evaluated.
Methods and Results Nine patients with both CC and C Afl underwent electrophysiological study with CS recordings during both rhythms with the use of a decapolar catheter with the tip placed in the distal CS. Patterns of CS activation during each type of Afl as well as during during sinus rhythm were categorized into 1 of 3 patterns: sequential proximal-to-distal, sequential distal-to-proximal, and fused, indicating activation from different directions. In 7 of 9 patients, the pattern of CS activation in CC Afl and C Afl differed, with a proximal-to-distal pattern in CC Afl and a fused pattern in C Afl. In 2 patients, pacing the high right atrial septum near the presumed site of Bachmanns bundle in sinus rhythm showed a similar fused pattern of CS activation.
Conclusions These results demonstrate different patterns of CS activation in CC Afl and C Afl in the majority of patients and are consistent with a model in which the left atrium is activated predominantly over Bachmanns bundle during C Afl and over the CS os in CC Afl. These findings may have implications for maintenance of Afl, interpretation of flutter wave morphology on surface ECG, and left atrial mechanical function in Afl.
Key Words: atrial flutter conduction arrhythmia
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Chugh, R. Latchamsetty, H. Oral, D. Elmouchi, D. Tschopp, S. Reich, P. Igic, T. Lemerand, E. Good, F. Bogun, et al. Characteristics of Cavotricuspid Isthmus-Dependent Atrial Flutter After Left Atrial Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, February 7, 2006; 113(5): 609 - 615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Narayan, A. Hassankhani, G. K. Feld, and V. Bhargava Separating non-isthmus- from isthmus-dependent atrial flutter using wavefront variability J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 19, 2005; 45(8): 1269 - 1279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Lemery, L. Soucie, B. Martin, A. S.L. Tang, M. Green, and J. Healey Human Study of Biatrial Electrical Coupling: Determinants of Endocardial Septal Activation and Conduction Over Interatrial Connections Circulation, October 12, 2004; 110(15): 2083 - 2089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Zhang, G. Younis, R. Hariharan, J. Ho, Y. Yang, J. Ip, R. K. Thakur, J. Seger, M. M. Scheinman, and J. Cheng Lower Loop Reentry as a Mechanism of Clockwise Right Atrial Flutter Circulation, April 6, 2004; 109(13): 1630 - 1635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |