This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Simon, A. Articles by Levenson, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Simon, A. Articles by Levenson, J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Hazardous Substances DB ATENOLOL ENALAPRIL MALEATE HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE Medline Plus Health Information High Blood Pressure Related Collections Imaging Clinical Studies

(Circulation. 2001;103:2949.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.

Clinical Investigation and Reports

Differential Effects of Nifedipine and Co-Amilozide on the Progression of Early Carotid Wall Changes

Alain Simon, MD; Jérome Gariépy, MD; Dominique Moyse, PhD; Jaime Levenson, MD

From the Centre de Médecine Préventive Cardiovasculaire, Hôpital Broussais, Paris, France.

Correspondence to Alain Simon, Centre de Médecine Préventive Cardiovasculaire, Hôpital Broussais, 96 Rue Didot, 75674 Paris, France. E-mail alain.simon{at}brs.ap-hop-paris.fr

Background—Common carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) progression was compared between 4 years of treatment with nifedipine and diuretic.

Methods and Results—This study, ancillary to the International Nifedipine GITS Study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT), involved nifedipine 30 mg or co-amilozide (hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg and amiloride 2.5 mg) with optional subsequent titration. Among 439 randomized hypertensive patients, 324 had 1 year of follow-up (intent-to-treat group), and 242 completed follow-up (until-end-of-study group). Ultrasonography was performed at baseline, 4 months later, and then every year. Central computerized reading provided far-wall IMT, diameter, and cross-sectional area IMT (CSA-IMT). The primary outcome was IMT progression rate (slope of IMT-time regression). Secondary outcomes were changes from baseline () in IMT, diameter, and CSA-IMT. In the until-end-of-study population, between-treatment differences existed in IMT progression rate (P=0.002), IMT (P=0.001), and CSA-IMT (P=0.006), because IMT progressed on co-amilozide but not on nifedipine. In the intent-to-treat population, treatment differences existed in IMT (P=0.004) and CSA-IMT (P=0.04) but not in IMT progression rate (P=0.09). Patients with 2, 3, or 4 years of follow-up showed treatment differences in IMT progression rate (P=0.04, 0.004, 0.007, respectively), IMT (P=0.005, 0.001, 0.005), and CSA-IMT (P=0.025, 0.013, 0.015). Diameter decreased more on co-amilozide than on nifedipine in the intent-to-treat population (P<0.05), whereas blood pressure decreased similarly on both treatments.

Conclusions—A difference in early carotid wall changes is shown between 2 equally effective antihypertensive treatments.

Key Words: carotid arteries • hypertrophy • hypertension • drugs

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C.-M. Yu, Q. Zhang, L. Lam, H. Lin, S.-L. Kong, W. Chan, J. W.-H. Fung, K. K K Cheng, I. H.-S. Chan, S. W.-L. Lee, et al. Comparison of intensive and low-dose atorvastatin therapy in the reduction of carotid intimal-medial thickness in patients with coronary heart disease Heart, August 1, 2007; 93(8): 933 - 939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Authors/Task Force Members:, G. Mancia, G. De Backer, A. Dominiczak, R. Cifkova, R. Fagard, G. Germano, G. Grassi, A. M. Heagerty, S. E. Kjeldsen, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur. Heart J., June 11, 2007; (2007) ehm236v1. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Mazzone, P. M. Meyer, S. B. Feinstein, M. H. Davidson, G. T. Kondos, R. B. D'Agostino Sr, A. Perez, J.-C. Provost, and S. M. Haffner Effect of Pioglitazone Compared With Glimepiride on Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial JAMA, December 6, 2006; 296(21): 2572 - 2581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Crouse III Thematic review series: Patient-Oriented Research. Imaging atherosclerosis: state of the art J. Lipid Res., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 1677 - 1699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-G. Wang, J. A. Staessen, Y. Li, L. M. Van Bortel, T. Nawrot, R. Fagard, F. H. Messerli, and M. Safar Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Antihypertensive Treatment: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Stroke, July 1, 2006; 37(7): 1933 - 1940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-P. Baguet, L. Hammer, P. Levy, H. Pierre, S. Launois, J.-M. Mallion, and J.-L. Pepin The Severity of Oxygen Desaturation Is Predictive of Carotid Wall Thickening and Plaque Occurrence Chest, November 1, 2005; 128(5): 3407 - 3412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Shinoda, Y. Yui, K. Kodama, A. Hirayama, H. Nonogi, K. Haze, T. Sumiyoshi, S. Hosoda, C. Kawai, and for the Japan Multicenter Investigation for Cardio Quantitative Coronary Angiogram Analysis: Nifedipine Retard Versus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (JMIC-B Side Arm Study) Hypertension, June 1, 2005; 45(6): 1153 - 1158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Zanchetti, G. Crepaldi, M. G. Bond, G. Gallus, F. Veglia, G. Mancia, A. Ventura, G. Baggio, L. Sampieri, P. Rubba, et al. Different Effects of Antihypertensive Regimens Based on Fosinopril or Hydrochlorothiazide With or Without Lipid Lowering by Pravastatin on Progression of Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis: Principal Results of PHYLLIS--A Randomized Double-Blind Trial Stroke, December 1, 2004; 35(12): 2807 - 2812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-A. Devynck, A. Simon, M.-G. Pernollet, G. Chironi, J. Gariepy, F. Rendu, and J. Levenson Plasma cGMP and Large Artery Remodeling in Asymptomatic Men Hypertension, December 1, 2004; 44(6): 919 - 923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Scuteri, S. S. Najjar, D. C. Muller, R. Andres, H. Hougaku, E. J. Metter, and E. G. Lakatta Metabolic syndrome amplifies the age-associated increases in vascular thickness and stiffness J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 21, 2004; 43(8): 1388 - 1395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Pontremoli, G. Leoncini, F. Viazzi, D. Parodi, E. Ratto, S. Vettoretti, M. Ravera, C. Tomolillo, and G. Deferrari Cardiovascular and Renal Risk Assessment as a Guide for Treatment in Primary Hypertension J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2004; 15(90010): S34 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. L. Bots, G. W. Evans, W. A. Riley, and D. E. Grobbee Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Measurements in Intervention Studies: Design Options, Progression Rates, and Sample Size Considerations: A Point of View Stroke, December 1, 2003; 34(12): 2985 - 2994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. G. Pockley, A. Georgiades, T. Thulin, U. de Faire, and J. Frostegard Serum Heat Shock Protein 70 Levels Predict the Development of Atherosclerosis in Subjects With Established Hypertension Hypertension, September 1, 2003; 42(3): 235 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A Staessen, J.-G. Wang, and W. H Birkenhager Outcome beyond blood pressure control? Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2003; 24(6): 504 - 514. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Zanchetti, M. G. Bond, M. Hennig, A. Neiss, G. Mancia, C. Dal Palu, L. Hansson, B. Magnani, K.-H. Rahn, J. L. Reid, et al. Calcium Antagonist Lacidipine Slows Down Progression of Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis: Principal Results of the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis (ELSA), a Randomized, Double-Blind, Long-Term Trial Circulation, November 5, 2002; 106(19): 2422 - 2427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-G. Wang and J. A. Staessen Conventional Therapy and Newer Drug Classes for Cardiovascular Protection in Hypertension J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2002; 13(90003): S208 - 215. [Abstract] [Full Text]