Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2000;101:461-465

Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Every, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cannon, C. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Every, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cannon, C. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Compliance/Adherence
Right arrow AHA Statements and Guidelines

(Circulation. 2000;101:461.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


AHA Scientific Statement

Critical Pathways

A Review

Nathan R. Every, MD, MPH; Judith Hochman, MD; Richard Becker, MD; Steve Kopecky, MD; Christopher P. Cannon, MD; for the Committee on Acute Cardiac Care, Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association


Key Words: AHA Scientific Statements • critical pathways • clinical protocols

Critical pathways, also known as critical paths, clinical pathways, or care paths, are management plans that display goals for patients and provide the sequence and timing of actions necessary to achieve these goals with optimal efficiency.1 As competition in the healthcare industry has increased, managers have embraced critical pathways as a method to reduce variation in care, decrease resource utilization, and potentially improve healthcare quality. Cardiovascular medicine in particular is an area in which critical pathways have been embraced. This is due in part to the high volume and high cost associated with cardiovascular diseases and procedures. In addition, the relatively mature guideline process has also contributed to the growth in use of critical pathways in cardiology.

Although anchored in clinical guidelines, the critical pathway is a distinct tool that details processes of care and highlights inefficiencies regardless of whether there is evidence to warrant changes in those processes. Clinical guidelines, on the other hand, are consensus statements that are systematically developed to assist practitioners in making patient management decisions related to specific clinical circumstances.2 Although clinical guidelines can and should be used in pathway development, the majority of processes included in a pathway have not been rigorously tested and are generally not addressed in guidelines. Another term that should also be distinguished from critical pathways is clinical protocols. Protocols are treatment recommendations that are often based on guidelines. Like the critical pathway, the goal of the clinical protocol may be to decrease treatment variation. However, protocols are most often . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
A Verdu, A Maestre, P Lopez, V Gil, A Martin-Hidalgo, and J A Castano
Clinical pathways as a healthcare tool: design, implementation and assessment of a clinical pathway for lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis
Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2009; 18(4): 314 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Telemed TelecareHome page
A. Pedragosa, J. Alvarez-Sabin, C. A Molina, C. Sanclemente, M C. Martin, F. Alonso, and M. Ribo
Impact of a telemedicine system on acute stroke care in a community hospital
J Telemed Telecare, July 1, 2009; 15(5): 260 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
InterfacesHome page
T. Hanne, T. Melo, and S. Nickel
Bringing Robustness to Patient Flow Management Through Optimized Patient Transports in Hospitals
Interfaces, May 1, 2009; 39(3): 241 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Intl J Care PathwHome page
R. Davies and C. Gray
Care pathways and designing the health-care built environment: an explanatory framework
Intl J Care Pathw, April 1, 2009; 13(1): 7 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
F. R. Ernst, W. N. Malatestinic, and W. T. Linde-Zwirble
Evaluating the clinical and financial impact of severe sepsis with Medicare or other administrative hospital data
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., March 15, 2006; 63(6): 575 - 581.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. Kwan and P. Sandercock
In-Hospital Care Pathways for, Stroke: An Updated Systematic Review
Stroke, June 1, 2005; 36(6): 1348 - 1349.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. Johnston, J. R. Goss, J. A. Malmgren, and J. A. Spertus
Health status and social risk correlates of extended length of stay following coronary artery bypass surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2004; 77(2): 557 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
M. Panella, S. Marchisio, and F. Di Stanislao
Reducing clinical variations with clinical pathways: do pathways work?
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2003; 15(6): 509 - 521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
P. W Armstrong
DO GUIDELINES INFLUENCE PRACTICE?
Heart, March 1, 2003; 89(3): 349 - 352.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. J. Benjamin, S. C. Smith Jr, R. S. Cooper, M. N. Hill, and R. V. Luepker
Task Force #1--magnitude of the prevention problem: opportunities and challenges
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 21, 2002; 40(4): 588 - 603.
[Full Text] [PDF]