This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Carretero, O. A. Articles by Oparil, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Carretero, O. A. Articles by Oparil, S. Related Collections Obesity Primary prevention Secondary prevention Other etiology Other Treatment

(Circulation. 2000;101:446.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.

Clinical Cardiology: New Frontiers

Essential Hypertension

Part II: Treatment

Oscar A. Carretero, MD; Suzanne Oparil, MD

From the Hypertension and Vascular Research Division, Heart and Vascular Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich (O.A.C.), and the Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham (S.O.).

Correspondence to Oscar A. Carretero, MD, Hypertension and Vascular Research Division, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202. E-mail ocarret1@hfhs.org

Key Words: hypertension • pathology • diagnosis

The goal of antihypertensive treatment is to reduce overall CVD risk and thus its morbidity and mortality rates. In any given patient, the decision to begin treatment is governed by the risk of CVD, which is determined by the magnitude of the BP elevation and the presence or absence of target organ disease and/or additional CVD risk factors. Recent consensus committees, including JNC VI and the World Health Organization–International Society of Hypertension (WHO-ISH) Guidelines Subcommittee, have modified traditional treatment recommendations in several important ways^3,35 : (1) Criteria for initiation of treatment now take into consideration total cardiovascular risk rather than BP alone, such that treatment is now recommended for persons whose BP is in the normal range but still bear a heavy burden of CVD risk factors or established CVD. (2) Systolic BP is recognized as an important target for treatment, particularly in older persons, because it is an even more important determinant of CVD risk than diastolic BP. (3) More aggressive BP goals are recommended for hypertensive patients with comorbid conditions such as diabetes mellitus or renal insufficiency. (4) The importance of tailoring the choice of antihypertensive drug treatment to the patient’s individual profile of concomitant CVD risk factors/comorbid conditions is emphasized. (5) The role of simultaneous reduction of multiple CVD risk factors in improving prognosis in hypertensive patients is stressed. (6) Home and ambulatory BP measurement has been recommended because of its value in guiding therapy and enhancing adherence to treatment. (7) Greater reliance on evidence-based medicine (ie, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. G Motwani Review: Combining renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade with diuretic therapy for treatment of hypertension Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, June 1, 2002; 3(2): 72 - 78. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. G. Asmar, G. M. London, M. E. O'Rourke, and M. E. Safar Improvement in Blood Pressure, Arterial Stiffness and Wave Reflections With a Very-Low-Dose Perindopril/Indapamide Combination in Hypertensive Patient: A Comparison With Atenolol Hypertension, October 1, 2001; 38(4): 922 - 926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]