(Circulation. 2000;101:1616.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Current Perspectives |
Key Words: mentors cardiology ethics
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
| Introduction |
|---|
Along time ago in a galaxy far, far away, there was a solitary young cardiologist standing at the crossroads of his medical career. As a starry-eyed college undergraduate, he had dreamed of combining the life of a scientist with the practice of medicine. This academic calling would intertwine the intellectual fruits of curiosity-driven science and the emotional satisfaction of making a lasting difference in the lives of patients. Although he had a gift for science in his coursework and was fascinated by new medical discoveries and therapies for heart diseases, he had little practical laboratory experience. The nagging questions of self-doubt, the difficulties of obtaining grants from the National Institutes of Health, and the war stories of younger faculty seemed to point to the default pathway of clinical cardiology in the nonacademic setting. However, the road to private practice was also littered with casualties, thus creating the current dilemma of choosing a career path. Unfortunately, the dark side of managed care had changed the balance in academic medicine, and there were too few academic role models to allow for an informed decision. Although he had "brains in his head" and "feet in his shoes," he did not know which "direction" to choose. In short, he needed a mentor.
Perhaps it is time
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. P. Faxon The Chain of Scientific Discovery: The Critical Role of the Physician-Scientist Circulation, April 16, 2002; 105(15): 1857 - 1860. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |