| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on December 5, 2003
From the Department of Cardiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: arenal{at}doymanet.es.
Background--Endocardial mapping before sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) induction may reduce mapping time during tachycardia and facilitate the ablation of unmappable VT. Methods and Results--Left ventricular electroanatomic voltage maps obtained during right ventricular apex pacing in 26 patients with chronic myocardial infarction referred for VT ablation were analyzed to identify conducting channels (CCs) inside the scar tissue. A CC was defined by the presence of a corridor of consecutive electrograms differentiated by higher voltage amplitude than the surrounding area. The effect of different levels of voltage scar definition, from 0.5 to 0.1 mV, was analyzed. Twenty-three channels were identified in 20 patients. The majority of CCs were identified when the voltage scar definition was Conclusions--CCs represent areas of slow conduction that can be identified in 75% of patients with SMVT. A tiered decreasing-voltage definition of the scar is critical for CC identification.
Revised on March 9, 2004
Accepted on March 11, 2004
Tachycardia-Related Channel in the Scar Tissue in Patients With Sustained Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardias. Influence of the Voltage Scar Definition
Angel Arenal MD*,
0.2 mV. Electrograms with
2 components were recorded more frequently at the inner than at the entrance of CCs (100% versus 75%, P
0.01). The activation time of the latest component was longer at the inner than at the entrance of CCs (200±40 versus 164±53 ms, P
0.001). Pacing from these CCs gave rise to a long-stimulus QRS interval (110±49 ms). Radiofrequency lesion applied to CCs suppressed the inducibility in 88% of CC-related tachycardias. During a follow-up of 17±11 months, 23% of the patients experienced a VT recurrence.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Carbucicchio, M. Santamaria, N. Trevisi, G. Maccabelli, F. Giraldi, G. Fassini, S. Riva, M. Moltrasio, M. Cireddu, F. Veglia, et al. Catheter Ablation for the Treatment of Electrical Storm in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in a Prospective Single-Center Study Circulation, January 29, 2008; 117(4): 462 - 469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Zeppenfeld, M. J. Schalij, M. M. Bartelings, U. B. Tedrow, B. A. Koplan, K. Soejima, and W. G. Stevenson Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia After Repair of Congenital Heart Disease: Electroanatomic Identification of the Critical Right Ventricular Isthmus Circulation, November 13, 2007; 116(20): 2241 - 2252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Almendral and M. E. Josephson All Patients With Hemodynamically Tolerated Postinfarction Ventricular Tachycardia Do Not Require an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Circulation, September 4, 2007; 116(10): 1204 - 1212. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. G. Stevenson and K. Soejima Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia Circulation, May 29, 2007; 115(21): 2750 - 2760. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. U. Klemm, R. Ventura, D. Steven, C. Johnsen, T. Rostock, B. Lutomsky, T. Risius, T. Meinertz, and S. Willems Catheter Ablation of Multiple Ventricular Tachycardias After Myocardial Infarction Guided by Combined Contact and Noncontact Mapping Circulation, May 29, 2007; 115(21): 2697 - 2704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. De Ponti and J. A. Salerno-Uriarte Non-fluoroscopic mapping systems for electrophysiology: the 'tool or toy' dilemma after 10 years Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2006; 27(10): 1134 - 1136. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |