on October 18, 2004
Published online before print October 18, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000145544.35565.47
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on December 5, 2003
From the Department of Cardiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: arenal{at}doymanet.es.
Background--Endocardial mapping before sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) induction may reduce mapping time during tachycardia and facilitate the ablation of unmappable VT. Methods and Results--Left ventricular electroanatomic voltage maps obtained during right ventricular apex pacing in 26 patients with chronic myocardial infarction referred for VT ablation were analyzed to identify conducting channels (CCs) inside the scar tissue. A CC was defined by the presence of a corridor of consecutive electrograms differentiated by higher voltage amplitude than the surrounding area. The effect of different levels of voltage scar definition, from 0.5 to 0.1 mV, was analyzed. Twenty-three channels were identified in 20 patients. The majority of CCs were identified when the voltage scar definition was Conclusions--CCs represent areas of slow conduction that can be identified in 75% of patients with SMVT. A tiered decreasing-voltage definition of the scar is critical for CC identification.
Revised on March 9, 2004
Accepted on March 11, 2004
Tachycardia-Related Channel in the Scar Tissue in Patients With Sustained Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardias. Influence of the Voltage Scar Definition
Angel Arenal MD*,
0.2 mV. Electrograms with 
2 components were recorded more frequently at the inner than at the entrance of CCs (100% versus 75%, P0.01). The activation time of the latest component was longer at the inner than at the entrance of CCs (200±40 versus 164±53 ms, P0.001). Pacing from these CCs gave rise to a long-stimulus QRS interval (110±49 ms). Radiofrequency lesion applied to CCs suppressed the inducibility in 88% of CC-related tachycardias. During a follow-up of 17±11 months, 23% of the patients experienced a VT recurrence.
Key words: catheter ablation • mapping • coronary disease • tachycardia, ventricular
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  K. Shivkumar and R. Tung Improving our understanding of epicardial ventricular tachycardia in nonischemic cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 25, 2009; 54(9): 809 - 811. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. M. Haqqani, J. M. Kalman, K. C. Roberts-Thomson, R. N. Balasubramaniam, R. Rosso, R. L. Snowdon, P. B. Sparks, J. K. Vohra, and J. B. Morton Fundamental Differences in Electrophysiologic and Electroanatomic Substrate Between Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients With and Without Clinical Ventricular Tachycardia J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 7, 2009; 54(2): 166 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. M. Aliot, W. G. Stevenson, J. M. Almendral-Garrote, F. Bogun, C. H. Calkins, E. Delacretaz, P. D. Bella, G. Hindricks, P. Jais, M. E. Josephson, et al. EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias: Developed in a partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a Registered Branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) Europace, June 1, 2009; 11(6): 771 - 817. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. G. Stevenson, D. J. Wilber, A. Natale, W. M. Jackman, F. E. Marchlinski, T. Talbert, M. D. Gonzalez, S. J. Worley, E. G. Daoud, C. Hwang, et al. Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Guided by Electroanatomic Mapping for Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia After Myocardial Infarction: The Multicenter Thermocool Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Trial Circulation, December 16, 2008; 118(25): 2773 - 2782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Sacher, U. B. Tedrow, M. E. Field, J.-M. Raymond, B. A. Koplan, L. M. Epstein, and W. G. Stevenson Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation: Evolution of Patients and Procedures Over 8 Years Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, August 1, 2008; 1(3): 153 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Carbucicchio, M. Santamaria, N. Trevisi, G. Maccabelli, F. Giraldi, G. Fassini, S. Riva, M. Moltrasio, M. Cireddu, F. Veglia, et al. Catheter Ablation for the Treatment of Electrical Storm in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in a Prospective Single-Center Study Circulation, January 29, 2008; 117(4): 462 - 469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Zeppenfeld, M. J. Schalij, M. M. Bartelings, U. B. Tedrow, B. A. Koplan, K. Soejima, and W. G. Stevenson Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia After Repair of Congenital Heart Disease: Electroanatomic Identification of the Critical Right Ventricular Isthmus Circulation, November 13, 2007; 116(20): 2241 - 2252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Almendral and M. E. Josephson All Patients With Hemodynamically Tolerated Postinfarction Ventricular Tachycardia Do Not Require an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Circulation, September 4, 2007; 116(10): 1204 - 1212. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. G. Stevenson and K. Soejima Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia Circulation, May 29, 2007; 115(21): 2750 - 2760. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. U. Klemm, R. Ventura, D. Steven, C. Johnsen, T. Rostock, B. Lutomsky, T. Risius, T. Meinertz, and S. Willems Catheter Ablation of Multiple Ventricular Tachycardias After Myocardial Infarction Guided by Combined Contact and Noncontact Mapping Circulation, May 29, 2007; 115(21): 2697 - 2704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. De Ponti and J. A. Salerno-Uriarte Non-fluoroscopic mapping systems for electrophysiology: the 'tool or toy' dilemma after 10 years Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2006; 27(10): 1134 - 1136. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|