Published Online
on June 28, 2004

A more recent version of this article appeared on July 13, 2004

This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 110/2/135    most recent 01.CIR.0000134956.96543.4Fv1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Togni, M. Articles by Hess, O. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Togni, M. Articles by Hess, O. M. Related Collections Restenosis Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents Coronary circulation

Submitted on September 3, 2003
Revised on March 16, 2004
Accepted on March 19, 2004

Deleterious Effect of Coronary Brachytherapy on Vasomotor Response to Exercise

Mario Togni MD, Stephan Windecker MD, Peter Wenaweser MD, David Tueller MD, Abudukadier Kaisaier MD, Willibald Maier MD, Bernhard Meier MD, and Otto M. Hess MD^*

From the Swiss Cardiovascular Center, Inselspital, Switzerland.

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: otto.martin.hess{at}insel.ch.

Background--Intracoronary radiotherapy (brachytherapy) has been proposed as treatment option for in-stent restenosis. Long-term results of brachytherapy with regard to vascular integrity and vasomotor responsiveness are unknown. The purpose of the present study was to determine the vasomotor response after brachytherapy and to assess its influence on vasomotion during exercise.

Methods and Results--Biplane quantitative coronary angiography was performed at rest and during bicycle exercise in 27 patients with coronary artery disease. Fourteen patients underwent coronary stenting and were studied 10±3 months after intervention (control group). Thirteen patients were treated with brachytherapy (Guidant Galileo System) for in-stent restenosis with a mean dosis of 20 Gy at 1 mm into the vessel wall and were studied 9±1 months after radiation (brachytherapy group). Minimal luminal area, stent area, and proximal, distal, and a reference vessel area were determined. The reference vessel showed exercise-induced vasodilation (26±4%, P<0.001) in both groups. Vasomotion within the stented vessel segments was abolished. In control subjects, the proximal and distal segments showed exercise-induced vasodilation (17±2% and 22±7%, respectively; P<0.005). In contrast, there was exercise-induced vasoconstriction in the proximal and distal vessel segments of the brachytherapy group (-14±3% and -16±4%, respectively; P<0.01). Sublingual nitroglycerin was associated with maximal vasodilation of the proximal and distal vessel segments in both groups.

Conclusions--Normal vessel segments elicit flow-mediated vasodilation during exercise. Stent implantation does not affect physiological response to exercise proximal and distal to the stent. Brachytherapy eliminates exercise-induced vasodilation, although dilatory response to nitroglycerin is maintained, suggesting endothelial dysfunction as the underlying mechanism.

Key words: stents • restenosis • exercise • vasodilation • vasoconstriction

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Tanaka, M. Sata, T. Natori, J.-r. Kim-Kaneyama, K. Nose, M. Shibanuma, Y. Hirata, and R. Nagai Circulating progenitor cells contribute to neointimal formation in nonirradiated chimeric mice FASEB J, February 1, 2008; 22(2): 428 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Togni, S. Eber, J. Widmer, M. Billinger, P. Wenaweser, S. Cook, R. Vogel, C. Seiler, F. R. Eberli, W. Maier, et al. Impact of Vessel Size on Outcome After Implantation of Sirolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: A Subgroup Analysis of the SIRTAX Trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 18, 2007; 50(12): 1123 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Wheatcroft, J. Byrne, M. Thomas, and P. MacCarthy Life-Threatening Coronary Artery Spasm Following Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Deployment J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 2, 2006; 47(9): 1911 - 1912. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Windecker, A. Remondino, F. R. Eberli, P. Juni, L. Raber, P. Wenaweser, M. Togni, M. Billinger, D. Tuller, C. Seiler, et al. Sirolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization N. Engl. J. Med., August 18, 2005; 353(7): 653 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Togni, S. Windecker, R. Cocchia, P. Wenaweser, S. Cook, M. Billinger, B. Meier, and O. M. Hess Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Associated With Paradoxic Coronary Vasoconstriction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 19, 2005; 46(2): 231 - 236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Serry and W. F. Penny Endothelial Dysfunction After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Placement J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 19, 2005; 46(2): 237 - 238. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Erne, P. Jamshidi, P. Juelke, H.-P. Hafner, P. Thum, and T. Resink Brachytherapy: Potential therapy for refractory coronary spasm J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 6, 2004; 44(7): 1415 - 1419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]