| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on August 5, 2003
From the Department of Cardiology, ISALA Klinieken, Hospital De Weezenlanden, Zwolle, The Netherlands. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: h.suryapranata{at}diagram-zwolle.nl.
Background--The aim of this study was to create a practical score for risk stratification in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary angioplasty and to assess the feasibility of early discharge in low-risk patients. Methods and Results--A prognostic score was built according to 30-day mortality rates in 1791 patients undergoing primary angioplasty for STEMI. For the identified low-risk patients without any contraindication to early discharge, we estimated and compared the costs of conventional care (prolonged 24-hour hospitalization) with the costs of shifting the care from inpatient to outpatient setting (early discharge) between 48 and 72 hours. Independent predictors of 30-day mortality included in the score were age, anterior infarction, Killip class, ischemic time, postprocedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow, and multivessel disease. This score was able to identify a large cohort (73.4%) of low-risk (score Conclusions--This score is a practical and useful index for risk stratification after primary angioplasty for STEMI, with a significant impact on clinical decision-making and the related costs. It reliably identifies a large group of patients at very low risk, who may safely be discharged early after primary angioplasty.
Revised on February 13, 2004
Accepted on February 17, 2004
Prognostic Assessment of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Angioplasty. Implications for Early Discharge
Giuseppe De Luca MD,
3) patients, with a good discriminatory capacity (c statistic=0.907). The mortality rate was 0.1% at 2 days and 0.2% between 2 and 10 days in patients with a score
3. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for late discharge in low-risk patients was estimated at |CE1949.33. Therefore, this policy would save 1 life per 1097 low-risk patients, at additional costs of |CE194 933.33, in comparison with an early discharge policy.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Marenzi, E. Assanelli, J. Campodonico, G. Lauri, I. Marana, M. De Metrio, M. Moltrasio, M. Grazi, M. Rubino, F. Veglia, et al. Contrast Volume During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Subsequent Contrast-Induced Nephropathy and Mortality Ann Intern Med, February 3, 2009; 150(3): 170 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. F Ludman Assessing the risks of percutaneous coronary intervention: do we have an equivalent of the EuroSCORE? Heart, November 1, 2008; 94(11): 1366 - 1369. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Halkin, M. Singh, E. Nikolsky, C. L. Grines, J. E. Tcheng, E. Garcia, D. A. Cox, M. Turco, T. D. Stuckey, Y. Na, et al. Prediction of Mortality After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The CADILLAC Risk Score J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 3, 2005; 45(9): 1397 - 1405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
How Early Should We Discharge STEMI Patients After Primary PCI? Journal Watch Cardiology, August 27, 2004; 2004(827): 2 - 2. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. SoRelle Cardiovascular News Circulation, June 8, 2004; 109(22): e9049 - e9049. [Full Text] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |