Published Online
on April 26, 2004

A more recent version of this article appeared on May 18, 2004

This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 109/19/2285    most recent 01.CIR.0000129252.96341.8Bv1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Graham, L. N. Articles by Mary, D. A.S.G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Graham, L. N. Articles by Mary, D. A.S.G. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Heart Attack Related Collections Acute myocardial infarction

Submitted on November 5, 2003
Revised on January 19, 2004
Accepted on February 13, 2004

Sympathetic Drive in Anterior and Inferior Uncomplicated Acute Myocardial Infarction

Lee N. Graham MB, ChB^*, Paul A. Smith MB, ChB, Robert J. Huggett MBBS, John B. Stoker BSc, MB, ChB, Alan F. Mackintosh MA, MD, and David A.S.G. Mary MB, ChB, PhD

From the Department of Cardiology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK.

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lee{at}graham93.fsnet.co.uk.

Background--The sympathetic activation that follows acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Because the prognosis after anterior AMI (ant-AMI) is worse than that after inferior AMI (inf-AMI), we planned to determine whether the magnitude of sympathetic hyperactivity differs between the two.

Methods and Results--Thirty-nine patients with uncomplicated AMI, comprising 2 matched groups of 17 patients with ant-AMI, and 22 patients with inf-AMI were examined. Measurements were obtained 2 to 4 days after AMI and compared with 20 normal subjects (NC) who were matched in terms of age and body weight to the AMI groups. Resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity was quantified from multiunit bursts (MSNA) and from single units (s-MSNA). Both groups of AMI patients were matched with regard to hemodynamic variables, left ventricular function, and infarct size. Both groups had greater (at least P<0.01) sympathetic nerve activity than NC (60±4.3 bursts/100 cardiac beats and 68±4.9 impulses/100 cardiac beats), but the magnitude of sympathetic nerve hyperactivity in ant-AMI (81±4.0 bursts/100 cardiac beats and 91±4.9 impulses/100 cardiac beats) was similar (P>0.05) to that in inf-AMI (80±3.2 bursts/100 cardiac beats and 90±4.0 impulses/100 cardiac beats)

Conclusions--Both ant-AMI and inf-AMI resulted primarily in a similar magnitude of sympathetic nerve hyperactivity. These findings suggest that the worse prognosis after ant-AMI compared with after inf-AMI would not be related primarily to the degree of sympathetic hyperactivity.

Key words: nervous system, sympathetic • myocardial infarction • action potentials

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. J. Hogarth, L. N. Graham, D. A.S.G. Mary, and J. P. Greenwood Gender differences in sympathetic neural activation following uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2009; 30(14): 1764 - 1770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. C. Parrish, K. Gritman, D. M. Van Winkle, W. R. Woodward, M. Bader, and B. A. Habecker Postinfarct sympathetic hyperactivity differentially stimulates expression of tyrosine hydroxylase and norepinephrine transporter Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): H99 - H106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Hainsworth and M. J. Drinkhill COUNTERPOINT: ACTIVE VENOCONSTRICTION IS NOT IMPORTANT IN MAINTAINING OR RAISING END-DIASTOLIC VOLUME AND STROKE VOLUME DURING EXERCISE AND ORTHOSTASIS J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2006; 101(4): 1264 - 1265. [Full Text] [PDF]

				REBUTTAL FROM DRS. HAINSWORTH AND DRINKHILL J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2006; 101(4): 1266 - 1266. [Full Text] [PDF]