Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on April 26, 2004

Circulation. 2004
Published online before print April 26, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000127962.74368.D9
A more recent version of this article appeared on May 18, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
109/19/2349    most recent
01.CIR.0000127962.74368.D9v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharifov, O. F.
Right arrow Articles by Fast, V. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharifov, O. F.
Right arrow Articles by Fast, V. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Arrythmias-basic studies

Submitted on August 12, 2003
Revised on February 5, 2004
Accepted on February 6, 2004

Intramural Virtual Electrodes in Ventricular Wall. Effects on Epicardial Polarizations

Oleg F. Sharifov PhD and Vladimir G. Fast PhD*

From the Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: fast{at}crml.uab.edu.

Background--Intramural virtual electrodes (IVEs) are believed to play an important role in defibrillation, but their existence in intact myocardium remains unproven. Here, IVEs were detected by use of optical recordings of shock-induced transmembrane potential (Vm) changes ({Delta}Vm) measured from the intact epicardial heart surface.

Methods and Results--To detect IVEs, isolated porcine left ventricles were sequentially stained with a Vm-sensitive dye by 2 methods: (1) surface staining (SS) and (2) global staining (GS) via coronary perfusion. Shocks (2 to 50 V/cm) were applied across the ventricular wall in an epicardial-to-endocardial direction during the action potential plateau via transparent mesh electrodes, and shock-induced {Delta}Vm were measured optically from the same epicardial locations after SS and GS. Optical recordings revealed significant differences between {Delta}Vm of 2 types that became more prominent with increasing shock strength: (1) for weak shocks, SS-{Delta}Vm were larger and faster than GS-{Delta}Vm; (2) for intermediate shocks, cathodal GS-{Delta}Vm became multiphasic, whereas SS-{Delta}Vm remained monophasic; and (3) for strong shocks, cathodal GS-{Delta}Vm became uniformly negative, whereas SS-{Delta}Vm typically remained positive. The radical differences in the shape and polarity of SS and GS polarizations can be explained by the contribution of subepicardial IVEs to optical signals. Histological examination revealed a dense network of collagen septa in the subepicardium, which could form the IVE substrate.

Conclusions--Intramural virtual electrodes are reflected in optical measurements of shock-induced {Delta}Vm on the intact epicardial surface. These IVEs could be a result of microscopic resistive discontinuities formed by collagen septa.


Key words: arrhythmia • defibrillation • excitation • mapping • ventricles




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. M. Maleckar, M. C. Woods, V. Y. Sidorov, M. R. Holcomb, D. N. Mashburn, J. P. Wikswo, and N. A. Trayanova
Polarity reversal lowers activation time during diastolic field stimulation of the rabbit ventricles: insights into mechanisms
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): H1626 - H1633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
V. Raman, A. E. Pollard, and V. G. Fast
Shock-induced changes of Cai2+ and Vm in myocyte cultures and computer model: Dependence on the timing of shock application
Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2007; 73(1): 101 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
C. W. Zemlin, S. Mironov, and A. M. Pertsov
Near-threshold field stimulation: Intramural versus surface activation
Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2006; 69(1): 98 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]