Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on April 5, 2004

Circulation. 2004
Published online before print April 5, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000126281.52345.52
A more recent version of this article appeared on April 13, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
109/14/1707    most recent
01.CIR.0000126281.52345.52v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, C.
Right arrow Articles by Perruchoud, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, C.
Right arrow Articles by Perruchoud, A. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other diagnostic testing

Submitted on October 24, 2003
Revised on February 19, 2004
Accepted on February 24, 2004

Procalcitonin and the Early Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis

Christian Mueller MD*, Peter Huber MD, Gerd Laifer MD, Beat Mueller MD, and André P. Perruchoud MD

From the Department of Internal Medicine (C.M., G.L., B.M., A.P.P.) and Department of Laboratory Medicine (P.H.), University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: chmueller{at}uhbs.ch.

Background--Variability in the clinical presentation of infective endocarditis (IE) makes the diagnosis a clinical challenge. We hypothesized that serum procalcitonin, a marker of systemic bacterial infection, might be helpful in its diagnosis.

Methods and Results--We conducted a prospective cohort study in 67 consecutive patients admitted to the hospital with the suspicion of IE or in whom the suspicion arose during the hospital course. IE was diagnosed by an interdisciplinary team that included an infectious disease specialist and a cardiologist who applied the Duke criteria. IE was confirmed in 21 patients. Procalcitonin was significantly higher in patients with IE (median 6.56 ng/mL) than in those with other final diagnoses (median 0.44 ng/mL, P<0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve that used procalcitonin to predict IE was 0.856 (95% CI 0.750 to 0.962), compared with 0.657 (95% CI 0.511 to 0.802) for C-reactive protein. The optimum concentration of procalcitonin for the calculation of positive and negative predictive accuracy as obtained from the receiver operating characteristic curve was 2.3 ng/mL. With this cutoff, the test characteristics of procalcitonin were as follows: sensitivity 81%, specificity 85%, negative predictive value 92%, and positive predictive value 72%. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that procalcitonin was the only significant independent predictor of IE on admission (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.15, P=0.018).

Conclusions--Procalcitonin may be a valuable additional diagnostic marker in patients with suspected IE.


Key words: hormones • endocarditis • infection • diagnosis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
D. W. M. Verhagen, J. Hermanides, J. C. Korevaar, P. M. M. Bossuyt, R. B. A. van den Brink, P. Speelman, and J. T. M. van der Meer
Prognostic Value of Serial C-Reactive Protein Measurements in Left-Sided Native Valve Endocarditis
Arch Intern Med, February 11, 2008; 168(3): 302 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. H. Rahimtoola
The year in valvular heart disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 4, 2005; 45(1): 111 - 122.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. SoRelle
Cardiovascular News
Circulation, April 13, 2004; 109(14): e9035 - e9035.
[Full Text]