| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on July 14, 2003
From the Johannes Gutenberg University Medical School, Clinic of Anesthesiology, Mainz, Germany (B.B.W., D.K.M., M.F.S., H.T., W.F.D.); the Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Leopold-Franzens Institute, Innsbruck, Austria (K.H.L.); Advanced Circulatory Systems Inc, Eden Prairie, Minn (T.A.P., K.G.L.); and the Division of Biostatistics (D.A.), School of Public Health, and Department of Emergency Medicine (K.G.L.), University of Minnesota, and Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lurie002{at}tc.umn.edu.
Background--Active compression-decompression (ACD) CPR combined with an inspiratory impedance threshold device (ITD) improves vital organ blood flow during cardiac arrest. This study compared survival rates with ACD+ITD CPR versus standard manual CPR (S-CPR). Methods and Results--A prospective, controlled trial was performed in Mainz, Germany, in which a 2-tiered emergency response included early defibrillation. Patients with out-of-hospital arrest of presumed cardiac pathogenesis were sequentially randomized to ACD+ITD CPR or S-CPR by the advanced life support team after intubation. Rescuers learned which method of CPR to use at the start of each work shift. The primary end point was 1-hour survival after a witnessed arrest. With ACD+ITD CPR (n=103), return of spontaneous circulation and 1- and 24-hour survival rates were 55%, 51%, and 37% versus 37%, 32%, and 22% with S-CPR (n=107) (P=0.016, 0.006, and 0.033, respectively). One- and 24-hour survival rates in witnessed arrests were 55% and 41% with ACD+ITD CPR versus 33% and 23% in control subjects (P=0.011 and 0.019), respectively. One- and 24-hour survival rates in patients with a witnessed arrest in ventricular fibrillation were 68% and 58% after ACD+ITD CPR versus 27% and 23% after S-CPR (P=0.002 and 0.009), respectively. Patients randomized Conclusions--Compared with S-CPR, ACD+ITD CPR significantly improved short-term survival rates for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Additional studies are needed to evaluate potential long-term benefits of ACD+ITD CPR.
Revised on August 8, 2003
Accepted on August 13, 2003
Comparison of Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Versus the Combination of Active Compression-Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and an Inspiratory Impedance Threshold Device for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Benno B. Wolcke MD,
10 minutes after the call for help to the ACD+ITD CPR had a 3 times higher 1-hour survival rate than control subjects (P=0.002). Hospital discharge rates were 18% after ACD+ITD CPR versus 13% in control subjects (P=0.41). In witnessed arrests, overall neurological function trended higher with ACD+ITD CPR versus control subjects (P=0.07).
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Dichtwald, I. Matot, and S. Einav Improving the Outcome of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The Importance of Being EARNEST Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2009; 13(1): 19 - 30. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Topjian, R. A. Berg, and V. M. Nadkarni Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Advances in Science, Techniques, and Outcomes Pediatrics, November 1, 2008; 122(5): 1086 - 1098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Anstadt and J. E. Lowe Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 487 - 506. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Rickards, K. L. Ryan, W. H. Cooke, K. G. Lurie, and V. A. Convertino Inspiratory resistance delays the reporting of symptoms with central hypovolemia: association with cerebral blood flow Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): R243 - R250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Srinivasan, V. M. Nadkarni, D. Yannopoulos, B. S. Marino, G. Sigurdsson, S. H. McKnite, M. Zook, D. G. Benditt, and K. G. Lurie Rapid Induction of Cerebral Hypothermia Is Enhanced With Active Compression-Decompression Plus Inspiratory Impedance Threshold Device Cardiopulmonary Resusitation in a Porcine Model of Cardiac Arrest J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 21, 2006; 47(4): 835 - 841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Part 6: CPR Techniques and Devices Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24_suppl): IV-47 - IV-50. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Part 4: Advanced Life Support Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22_suppl): III-25 - III-54. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Yannopoulos, V. M. Nadkarni, S. H. McKnite, A. Rao, K. Kruger, A. Metzger, D. G. Benditt, and K. G. Lurie Intrathoracic Pressure Regulator During Continuous-Chest-Compression Advanced Cardiac Resuscitation Improves Vital Organ Perfusion Pressures in a Porcine Model of Cardiac Arrest Circulation, August 9, 2005; 112(6): 803 - 811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Ewy Cardiocerebral Resuscitation: The New Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Circulation, April 26, 2005; 111(16): 2134 - 2142. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Active Compression-Decompression CPR with an Inspiratory Impedance Device Is Promising Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, December 17, 2003; 2003(1217): 5 - 5. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. SoRelle Cardiovascular News Circulation, November 4, 2003; 108 (18): e9047 - e9048. [Full Text] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |