on November 11, 2002
Published online before print November 11, 2002, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000038704.84304.6F
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on June 17, 2002
From Washington University School of Medicine (M.N.F., K.T.B., M.T., B.L.) and Stereotaxis, Inc, St Louis, Mo (W.B., J.F., A.H., J.R., J.S.). * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: MitchNF{at}pol.net.
Background—Ablation of complex arrhythmias would be greatly facilitated by more precise control of ablation catheters. A feasibility study was performed in animals to evaluate a novel magnetic guidance system (MGS) that generates a magnetic field to control the movement and position of a magnetic ablation catheter. Methods and Results—The MGS is composed of a digital biplanar fluoroscope within an array of superconducting electromagnets that surround the torso of the experimental animal and a computer control system that generates a composite magnetic field for directional catheter deflection. Magnetic catheter navigation was performed in dogs and pigs (20 to 30 kg). A 7F magnetic ablation catheter was used for intracardiac navigation and radiofrequency ablation. The performance of a standard 7F deflectable catheter was not affected by the MGS. The magnetic catheter was navigated successfully to 51 predefined targets throughout the heart in 6 animals. In 5 animals, the magnetic catheter, guided by a 3D computed tomogram, was successfully navigated to all pulmonary veins. Navigation accuracy was estimated as <1 mm displacement from the target. The magnetic catheter was used to ablate the atrioventricular node in 4 animals and to perform linear ablations across the endocardial surface underlying an epicardial multielectrode recording plaque in 4 animals. Conclusions—These results demonstrate that the MGS can navigate and stabilize an ablation catheter at endocardial targets. Linear or focal radiofrequency ablation with the magnetic catheter is not compromised by the magnetic field. This technology provides precise control of endocardial catheters.
Revised on August 23, 2002
Accepted on August 24, 2002
Novel, Magnetically Guided Catheter for Endocardial Mapping and Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation
Mitchell N. Faddis MD, PhD*,
Key words: mapping • ablation • catheters
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  P. G. Kyrtatos, P. Lehtolainen, M. Junemann-Ramirez, A. Garcia-Prieto, A. N. Price, J. F. Martin, D. G. Gadian, Q. A. Pankhurst, and M. F. Lythgoe Magnetic Tagging Increases Delivery of Circulating Progenitors in Vascular Injury J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., August 1, 2009; 2(8): 794 - 802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. M. Aliot, W. G. Stevenson, J. M. Almendral-Garrote, F. Bogun, C. H. Calkins, E. Delacretaz, P. D. Bella, G. Hindricks, P. Jais, M. E. Josephson, et al. EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias: Developed in a partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a Registered Branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) Europace, June 1, 2009; 11(6): 771 - 817. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Ernst The future of atrial fibrillation ablation: new technologies and indications: Atrial fibrillation Heart, January 15, 2009; 95(2): 158 - 163. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Schmidt, K. R. J. Chun, R. R. Tilz, B. Koektuerk, F. Ouyang, and K.-H. Kuck Remote navigation systems in electrophysiology Europace, November 1, 2008; 10(suppl_3): iii57 - iii61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Mehta, D. T. Hart, B. S. Nagra, Z. Liu, and B. K. Kantharia Successful ablation of focal left atrial tachycardia using Stereotaxis NiobeTM remote magnetic navigation system Europace, March 1, 2008; 10(3): 280 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. D. Lindsay Is Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation a Critical Determinant of Recurrent Arrhythmias After Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 28, 2007; 50(9): 875 - 876. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Calkins, J. Brugada, D. L. Packer, R. Cappato, S.-A. Chen, H. J.G. Crijns, R. J. Damiano Jr, D. W. Davies, D. E. Haines, M. Haissaguerre, et al. HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Personnel, Policy, Procedures and Follow-Up: A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed and Approved by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Europace, June 1, 2007; 9(6): 335 - 379. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Pappone, G. Vicedomini, F. Manguso, F. Gugliotta, P. Mazzone, S. Gulletta, N. Sora, S. Sala, A. Marzi, G. Augello, et al. Robotic Magnetic Navigation for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 4, 2006; 47(7): 1390 - 1400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.S. Thornton, P. Janse, D.A.M.J. Theuns, M.F. Scholten, and L.J. Jordaens Magnetic navigation in AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia study: early results of ablation with one- and three-magnet catheters. Europace, April 1, 2006; 8(4): 225 - 230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. D. Lindsay Perspectives on the development of a magnetic navigation system for remote control of electrophysiology catheters. Europace, April 1, 2006; 8(4): 231 - 232. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Schiemann, R. Killmann, M. Kleen, N. Abolmaali, J. Finney, and T. J. Vogl Vascular Guide Wire Navigation with a Magnetic Guidance System: Experimental Results in a Phantom Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 475 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Ernst, F. Ouyang, C. Linder, K. Hertting, F. Stahl, J. Chun, H. Hachiya, D. Bansch, M. Antz, and K.-H. Kuck Initial Experience With Remote Catheter Ablation Using a Novel Magnetic Navigation System: Magnetic Remote Catheter Ablation Circulation, March 30, 2004; 109(12): 1472 - 1475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Kobayashi, T. Gotohda, K. Tamakawa, H. Ueda, and T. Kakizoe Magnetic Anchor for More Effective Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2004; 34(3): 118 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Ernst, F. Ouyang, C. Linder, K. Hertting, F. Stahl, J. Chun, H. Hachiya, U. Krumsdorf, M. Antz, and K.-H. Kuck Modulation of the slow pathway in the presence of a persistent left superior caval vein using the novel magnetic navigation system Niobe Europace, January 1, 2004; 6(1): 10 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. F. Scholten and L. J. Jordaens Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: still investigational or already an established therapy? Europace, January 1, 2004; 6(2): 79 - 82. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. N. Faddis, J. Chen, J. Osborn, M. Talcott, M. E. Cain, and B. D. Lindsay Magnetic guidance system for cardiac electrophysiology: a prospective trial of safety and efficacy in humans J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 3, 2003; 42(11): 1952 - 1958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. E. Cain and M. N. Faddis Mapping atrial fibrillation: Uncertainty despite resolution J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 16, 2003; 42(2): 361 - 363. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|