| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on April 12, 2002
From the Department of Cardiology (P.S., J.B.M., J.G.M., N.C.D., S.J.S., J.K.V., J.M.K., P.B.S.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, and the Department of Medicine (P.S., J.B.M., J.K.V., J.M.K.), University of Melbourne, Australia. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: paul.sparks{at}mh.org.au.
BackgroundAtrial mechanical stunning develops on termination of chronic atrial arrhythmias and is implicated in the genesis of thromboembolic complications after cardioversion. The mechanisms responsible for atrial mechanical stunning are unknown. The effects of atrial rate, isoproterenol, and calcium on atrial mechanical function in patients with atrial stunning have not been evaluated, and it is not known if atrial stunning can be reversed. Methods and ResultsThirty-five patients with chronic atrial flutter (AFL) undergoing radiofrequency ablation were studied. Fifteen patients in sinus rhythm undergoing ablation for paroxysmal AFL were studied as control for effects of the procedure. Left atrial appendage emptying velocities (LAAEVs) and spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (LASEC) were assessed by transesophageal echocardiography during AFL, after reversion to sinus rhythm, during atrial pacing at cycle lengths of 750 to 250 ms, after a postpacing pause, and with isoproterenol or calcium. With termination of AFL, LAAEV decreased from 59.0±3.7 cm/s to 18.8±1.4 cm/s (P<0.0001) and LASEC grade increased from 0.9±0.1 to 2.2±0.2 (P<0.0001). Pacing increased LAAEV to a maximum of 38.4±3.2 cm/s (P<0.0001) and reduced LASEC grade to 1.9±0.2 (P=0.005). Isoproterenol and calcium reversed atrial mechanical stunning with LAAEV increasing to 89.3±12.6 cm/s (P=0.0007) and 50.2±10.5 cm/s (P=0.005), respectively, and LASEC grade decreasing to 0.2±0.1 (P=0.001) and 1.4±0.2 (P=0.01), respectively. The postpacing pause increased LAAEV to 69.3±3.7 cm/s (P<0.0001). No change in LAAEV was observed in the paroxysmal AFL group. ConclusionAtrial mechanical stunning can be reversed by pacing at increased rates and through the administration of isoproterenol or calcium. These findings suggest a functional contractile apparatus in the mechanically remodeled atrium as a result of chronic atrial flutter.
Revised on July 18, 2002
Accepted on July 19, 2002
Reversal of Atrial Mechanical Stunning After Cardioversion of Atrial Arrhythmias. Implications for the Mechanisms of Tachycardia-Mediated Atrial Cardiomyopathy
Prashanthan Sanders MBBS,
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. G. Cosio, E. Aliot, G. L. Botto, H. Heidbuchel, C. J. Geller, P. Kirchhof, J.-C. De Haro, R. Frank, J. P. Villacastin, J. Vijgen, et al. Delayed rhythm control of atrial fibrillation may be a cause of failure to prevent recurrences: reasons for change to active antiarrhythmic treatment at the time of the first detected episode Europace, January 1, 2008; 10(1): 21 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Schotten, S. de Haan, S. Verheule, E. G.A. Harks, D. Frechen, E. Bodewig, M. Greiser, R. Ram, J. Maessen, M. Kelm, et al. Blockade of atrial-specific K+-currents increases atrial but not ventricular contractility by enhancing reverse mode Na+/Ca2+-exchange Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2007; 73(1): 37 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. de Haan, M. Greiser, E. Harks, Y. Blaauw, A. van Hunnik, S. Verheule, M. Allessie, and U. Schotten AVE0118, Blocker of the Transient Outward Current (Ito) and Ultrarapid Delayed Rectifier Current (IKur), Fully Restores Atrial Contractility After Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation in the Goat Circulation, September 19, 2006; 114(12): 1234 - 1242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Goette and U. Schotten Inhibition of angiotensin II type 1 receptors reduces atrial stunning and spontaneous echo contrast after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2006; 27(17): 2034 - 2035. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Takagi, A Doi, N Shirai, K Hirata, Y Takemoto, K Takeuchi, and J Yoshikawa Acute improvement of atrial mechanical stunning after electrical cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation: comparison between biatrial and single atrial pacing Heart, January 1, 2005; 91(1): 58 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Todd, S. P. Fynn, A. P. Walden, W. J. Hobbs, S. Arya, and C. J. Garratt Repetitive 4-Week Periods of Atrial Electrical Remodeling Promote Stability of Atrial Fibrillation: Time Course of a Second Factor Involved in the Self-Perpetuation of Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, March 23, 2004; 109(11): 1434 - 1439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Sanders, J. B. Morton, P. M. Kistler, J. K. Vohra, J. M. Kalman, and P. B. Sparks Reversal of Atrial Mechanical Dysfunction After Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation: Implications for the Mechanisms of Tachycardia-Mediated Atrial Cardiomyopathy Circulation, October 21, 2003; 108(16): 1976 - 1984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Takami, M. Suzuki, K. Sugi, and T. Ikeda Time course for resolution of left atrial appendage stunning after catheter ablation of chronic atrial flutter J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 18, 2003; 41(12): 2207 - 2211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |