Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on August 5, 2002

Circulation. 2002
Published online before print August 5, 2002, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000027566.51212.3F
A more recent version of this article appeared on August 27, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/9/1104    most recent
01.CIR.0000027566.51212.3Fv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowers, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bowers, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction

Submitted on April 29, 2002
Revised on June 11, 2002
Accepted on June 11, 2002

Patterns of Coronary Compromise Resulting in Acute Right Ventricular Ischemic Dysfunction

Terry R. Bowers MD, William W. O'Neill MD, Mark Pica BS, and James A. Goldstein MD*

From the Division of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Mich.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jgoldstein{at}beaumont.edu.

Background—Although proximal right coronary artery (RCA) occlusion is the culprit commonly responsible for acute right ventricular (RV) infarction (RVI), the severity of RV dysfunction ranges broadly. This study was designed to delineate the patterns of coronary compromise that determine the magnitude of RV ischemic dysfunction.

Methods and Results—In 125 patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction undergoing emergency angiography, the culprit infarct lesion was identified, RV branch flow assessed (TIMI flows and frame counts), and individual patient RV perfusion indices calculated by separately averaging the branch flows and frame counts, which were correlated with RV wall motion by ultrasound. RVI occurred in 53 (42%) patients, with the RCA as the culprit vessel and the lesion sufficiently proximal to compromise flow in at least one RV branch in all cases, thereby resulting in depressed RV perfusion (flow index, 0.7±0.2). In patients without RVI, the RCA was the culprit in 89%; the circumflex, in 11%. RCA culprits were proximal in 19% of such cases, with lack of RVI explained by preserved RV perfusion (flow index, 2.7±0.3; P=0.001) attributable to at least 1 patent RV branch, spontaneous reperfusion, or prominent collaterals. Overall, there was a strong correlation between RV perfusion and wall motion (Spearman correlation coefficient=0.79).

Conclusions—Proximal RCA occlusion compromising RV branch perfusion commonly results in RV ischemic dysfunction. In some cases with proximal RCA culprits, collaterals or spontaneous reperfusion preserve RV performance.


Key words: ventricles • arteries • myocardial infarction • collateral circulation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Kumar, H. Abdel-Aty, I. Kriedemann, J. Schulz-Menger, C. M. Gross, R. Dietz, and M. G. Friedrich
Contrast-Enhanced Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Right Ventricular Infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 21, 2006; 48(10): 1969 - 1976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. A. Goldstein
Right versus left ventricular shock: A tale of two ventricles
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 16, 2003; 41(8): 1280 - 1282.
[Full Text] [PDF]