Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on May 13, 2002

Circulation. 2002
Published online before print May 13, 2002, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000018949.39445.40
A more recent version of this article appeared on May 28, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/21/2465    most recent
01.CIR.0000018949.39445.40v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morino, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Fitzgerald, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Morino, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Fitzgerald, P. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents

Submitted on January 14, 2002
Revised on April 10, 2002
Accepted on April 10, 2002

Late Vascular Response to Repeat Stenting for In-Stent Restenosis With and Without Radiation. An Intravascular Ultrasound Volumetric Analysis

Yoshihiro Morino MD, Thosaphol Limpijankit MD, Yasuhiro Honda MD, Alexandra J. Lansky MD, Ron Waksman MD, Heidi N. Bonneau RN, MS, Paul G. Yock MD, Gary S. Mintz MD, and Peter J. Fitzgerald MD, PhD*

From the Center for Research in Cardiovascular Interventions, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (Y.M., T.L., Y.H., P.G.Y., P.J.F.); Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (R.W.); Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (A.J.L., G.S.M.); and Highlands Consulting Inc, San Jose, Calif (H.N.B.).

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ivus{at}crci.stanford.edu.

Background—Re-stenting of in-stent restenosis (ISR) improves acute angiographic results.

Methods and Results—Volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis was performed in 70 ISR lesions that received either placebo (n=36) or 192Ir radiation (n=34). ISR lesions treated by re-stenting were divided into 3 groups: old stent not re-stented (A), old/new stent overlap (B), and new stent only (C). ISR lesions treated without re-stenting were categorized as D. In placebo patients, postintervention lumen volume index (LVI) was significantly greater in re-stented segments B and C than in non--re-stented segment A (P<0.05).At follow-up, however, LVI was similar in all 4 segments secondary to the increased intimal hyperplasia (IH) reaccumulation within the re-stented segments. In patients treated with 192Ir radiation, LVI was maintained from baseline to follow-up only in non--re-stented segments A and D. Conversely, there was a significant decrease in LVI in re-stented segments B and C (P<0.05). Qualitatively, 79% of patients in the irradiated group had stent struts with undetectable neointimal versus only 27% in the placebo group (P<0.001). Coefficient of variation of IH reaccumulation was greater in re-stented segments of 192Ir patients (B=57.3% and C=58.9%) than in re-stented segments in placebo patients (B=27.3% and C 26.8%) and non--re-stented segments in irradiated patients.

Conclusions—Additional lumen gain from re-stenting ISR lesions is counteracted by exaggerated neointimal proliferation in placebo patients. Maximum effectiveness and safety of radiation can be achieved for ISR lesions when treated without re-stenting. Thus, regardless of supplementary intravascular brachytherapy, repeat stenting strategies provided little long-term advantage.


Key words: restenosis • radioisotopes • stents • coronary disease