Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on May 13, 2002

Circulation. 2002
Published online before print May 13, 2002, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000018126.87045.E0
A more recent version of this article appeared on June 11, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/23/2737    most recent
01.CIR.0000018126.87045.E0v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grise, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Teirstein, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Grise, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Teirstein, P. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Restenosis
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents

Submitted on January 16, 2002
Revised on March 28, 2002
Accepted on March 28, 2002

Five-Year Clinical Follow-Up After Intracoronary Radiation. Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Mark A. Grise MD, Vincent Massullo MD, Shirish Jani PhD, Jeffrey J. Popma MD, Robert J. Russo MD, PhD, Richard A. Schatz MD, Erminia M. Guarneri MD, Stephen Steuterman MS, David A. Cloutier BS, Martin B. Leon MD, Prabhakar Tripuraneni MD, and Paul S. Teirstein MD*

From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases (M.A.G., R.J.R., R.A.S., E.M.G., S.S., D.A.C., P.S.T.) and Division of Radiation Oncology (V.M., S.J., P.T.), Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, Calif; Division of Cardiology (J.J.P.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass; and Division of Cardiology (M.B.L.), Lenox Hill, New York, NY.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Radman{at}scrippsclinic.com.

Background—Several clinical trials indicate that intracoronary radiation is safe and effective for treatment of restenotic coronary arteries. We previously reported 6-month and 3-year clinical and angiographic follow-up demonstrating significant decreases in target lesion revascularization (TLR) and angiographic restenosis after {gamma} radiation of restenotic lesions. The objective of this study was to document the clinical outcome 5 years after treatment of restenotic coronary arteries with catheter-based iridium-192 (192Ir).

Methods and Results—A double-blind, randomized trail compared 192Ir to placebo sources in patients with restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Over a 9-month period, 55 patients were enrolled; 26 were randomized to 192Ir and 29 to placebo. At 5-year follow-up, TLR was significantly lower in the 192Ir group (23.1% versus 48.3%; P=0.05). There were 2 TLRs between years 3 and 5 in patients in the 192Ir group and none in patients in the placebo group. The 5-year event-free survival rate (freedom from death, myocardial infarction, or TLR) was greater in 192Ir-treated patients (61.5% versus 34.5%; P=0.02).

Conclusions—Despite apparent mitigation of efficacy over time, there remains a significant reduction in TLR at 5 years and an improvement in event-free survival in patients treated with intracoronary 192Ir. The early clinical benefits after intracoronary {gamma} radiation with 192Ir seem durable at 5-year clinical follow-up.


Key words: restenosis • angioplasty • stents • radioisotopes