| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on January 18, 2002
From the University of L'Aquila, Department of Internal Medicine and Public Health (C.F., G.P., G.T., A.S., G.D., A.E.G.), Italy; and Departments of Cardiovascular Medicine (R.C.S., J.B.Y., M.H.Y.), Anatomic Pathology (N.B.R.), and Cardiothoracic Surgery (P.M.), and the Allogen Laboratory (D.J.C.), Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: yamanim{at}ccf.org.
BackgroundEndothelin-1 (ET-1), a potent vasoconstrictor, is released in response to several inflammatory cytokines after heart transplantation. The present study correlated patterns of myocardial ET-1 expression in heart biopsies with acute rejection, post-transplantation ischemic injury, and subsequent development of coronary vasculopathy. Methods and ResultsPatterns of myocardial ET-1 expression were evaluated in 47 heart transplant recipients at 3 months after transplant. Transplant vasculopathy was documented by coronary angiography at 2 years after transplant. Expression of ET-1 was tabulated for both blood vessels and the interstitium. Vascular ET-1 expression was positive in 7/17 (41%) of patients with greater than grade 2 (International Society Heart Lung Transplant) rejection compared with 3/30 (10%) of patients with grade 0 and grade 1A rejection (P=0.02). Compared with patients with negative interstitial ET-1 expression (n=22), patients with positive interstitial ET-1 expression (n=25) had higher incidence of post-transplantation ischemic injury (52% versus 9%, P=0.002), lower mean episodes of acute rejection ( ConclusionsVascular ET-1 expression is likely to be associated with acute rejection. Interstitial ET-1 expression, however, is more likely to be associated with post-transplantation ischemic injury and subsequent development of coronary vasculopathy.
Revised on February 25, 2002
Accepted on March 1, 2002
Patterns of Myocardial Endothelin-1 Expression and
Outcome After Cardiac Transplantation
Claudio Ferri MD,
grade 2) during the first 3 months of transplant (1.09±0.66 versus 1.86±1.6, P=0.048), and more common vasculopathy at 2 years (50% versus 15%, P=0.02), and they tended to have worse survival (83.2% versus 100%, P=0.058).
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Larose, D. Behrendt, S. Kinlay, A. P. Selwyn, P. Ganz, and J. C. Fang Endothelin-1 Is a Key Mediator of Coronary Vasoconstriction in Patients With Transplant Coronary Arteriosclerosis Circ Heart Fail, September 1, 2009; 2(5): 409 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W.M. Fedak, V. Rao, S. Verma, D. Ramzy, L. Tumiati, S. Miriuka, P. Boylen, R. D. Weisel, and C. M. Feindel Combined endothelial and myocardial protection by endothelin antagonism enhances transplant allograft preservation J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2005; 129(2): 407 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |