Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2007;116:II_846

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benson, V. M
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Benson, V. M

(Circulation. 2007;116:II_846.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Modifying Risks and Risks of Intervention

Abstract 3724: A One-Step Statin Titration Process Moves Large Numbers of Patients to LDL-C Goal

Victor M Benson

Southern California Kaiser Permanente, Harbor City, CA

Introduction. Although compelling evidence supports the concept that people at high CVD risk should have LDL-C < 100, a substantial number of them have levels > 99 even though on statin treatment. This has been attributed to inadequate or absent medication titration. This project’s purpose is to lower LDL-C in a large population of high risk people by a centralized pharmacy-mediated medication efficacy increase process that involves minimal physician time.

Methods. Diabetes or CVD patients on a statin and with an LDL > 99 were selected (N > 3000). Because by design there was minimal physician or pharmacist contact with patients, for safety extensive exclusion criteria were applied. Prescribing physicians were asked via a web-based "eApproval" message to approve or disapprove each patient’s inclusion in the project. Pharmacists increased approved patients’ statin efficacy via a titration algorithm designed to lower LDL-C to < 100 in 1 step. Patients were informed by automated phone message and letter that their next medication refill would be a higher dose or stronger medication and advised to perform follow-up lab.

Results. Most (88%) panel-carrying physicians responded to the eApproval request, approving 92% of their patients. In 6 days, 2 pharmacists increased the medication efficacy for 787 patients. At an average of 52 days (range 1–153) after titration, 75% of patients had filled their new prescription and 62% of those had done a subsequent LDL-C test. LDL-C was reduced by 27 from a baseline mean of 118 to a post-titration mean of 91 mg/dL, a 23% reduction. LDL-C < 100 mg/dL was achieved by 71% of patients. Patients of physicians who did not respond to the eApproval request (N = 110) lowered their mean LDL-C from 123.7 to 119.4, a 3.5% reduction and12.7% of these "usual care" patients attained an LDL-C < 100.

Conclusions:





This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benson, V. M
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Benson, V. M