This Article Extract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bhatt, D. L. Articles by Topol, E. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bhatt, D. L. Articles by Topol, E. J. Related Collections Secondary prevention Risk Factors Mechanism of atherosclerosis/growth factors

(Circulation. 2002;106:136.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.

Current Perspective

Need to Test the Arterial Inflammation Hypothesis

Deepak L. Bhatt, MD; Eric J. Topol, MD

From the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

Correspondence to Eric J. Topol, MD, 9500 Euclid Ave, Desk F25, Cleveland, OH 44195. E-mail topole{at}ccf.org

Key Words: arteries • inflammation • coronary disease

	Introduction

Top Introduction Inflammation as a Risk... Pathogenic Role of Inflammation Effect of Medical Therapy... Evidence for Suppressing... Need for a Clinical... References

 
Despite intensive basic and clinical investigation, coronary artery disease remains the principal cause of death and disability in the United States. In recent years, the appreciation of arterial inflammation as an important risk factor has had considerable implications for changing our approach to managing these patients.^1,2 Arterial inflammation has emerged as central to the progression of atherothrombosis.³ Of the markers of inflammation, the high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) is the most studied, with evidence that it may also play a direct pathogenic role in atherosclerotic lesion formation.^{4– 11} In the absence of active infection, measurements of CRP are reasonably reproducible, comparable to measurements of total cholesterol.^12,13 Additionally, elevated CRP appears to be a more potent risk factor than other mediators of inflammation, such as tumor necrosis factor-, interleukin-6, or serum amyloid A.^4,14 A group of pharmacotherapies that are currently available, such as aspirin, statins, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is), thienopyridines, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists have been shown, in addition to their other properties, to reduce CRP and/or arterial inflammation. Although it is clear that elevated CRP denotes increased risk and emerging evidence suggests that there are novel therapies that result in lowering of CRP, the most important unanswered question is whether suppression of inflammation and consequent lowering of CRP will translate into a decrease in clinical events.¹⁵ Surprisingly, despite the importance of the question, the "inflammation hypothesis" of intentional CRP suppression as compared with standard care has not yet been tested. Such a prospective study of patients with established cardiovascular disease and elevated baseline CRP in which incremental pharmacotherapy would be guided by reassessments of the CRP marker could allow formulation of a rational therapeutic strategy instead of an approach of "polypharmacy" for every patient.

	Inflammation as a Risk Factor

Top Introduction Inflammation as a Risk... Pathogenic Role of Inflammation Effect of Medical Therapy... Evidence for Suppressing... Need for a Clinical... References

 
CRP serves as a marker of inflammation and predicts risk of adverse cardiovascular events. Elevated CRP seems to be effective at identifying risk of future ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Biasucci et al¹⁶ found patients with a CRP level >0.3 mg/dL had 8.6 times the risk of recurrent ischemic events than patients without this degree of CRP elevation. Interestingly, in this study, 49% of patients had a CRP level >0.3 mg/dL at discharge, indicating just how frequently inflammatory markers are elevated in patients at risk for future ischemia.

In the setting of myocardial infarction (MI), CRP is also an important discriminator of risk, even in patients without residual ischemia or left ventricular dysfunction.¹⁷ The risk stratification allowed by CRP is independent of myocardial necrosis as measured by troponin elevation.^18–20 In patients undergoing angiography, elevated CRP is associated with more severe angiographic characteristics, such as thrombotic lesions, highlighting the interconnection between thrombosis and inflammation.²¹ Elevated CRP predicts the need for repeat revascularization procedures.²² Even in chronic stable angina, CRP levels are increased and correlate with outcome.^23,24 Importantly, CRP provides prognostic information that is at least as strong as that provided by exercise stress testing.²⁵ The ability of CRP elevation to confer risk is found in patients both with and without angiographic coronary artery disease, with independent and additive effects.^5,26

Furthermore, CRP elevation predicts the risk of recurrent stroke, as well as development of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease.^27–29 Indeed, CRP seems to be associated with risk even in those who are apparently healthy.³⁰ Thus, CRP is a potent prognosticator of pan-vascular risk, with an ability to risk-stratify that is complementary to other serological, noninvasive, and invasive tests.

	Pathogenic Role of Inflammation

Top Introduction Inflammation as a Risk... Pathogenic Role of Inflammation Effect of Medical Therapy... Evidence for Suppressing... Need for a Clinical... References

 
Recent work suggests that CRP may also play a direct pathogenic role in atherosclerotic lesion formation. Uptake of CRP-opsonized native LDL-cholesterol by macrophages seems to contribute to foam cell formation.⁷ The presence of a CRP-receptor on monocytes may aid in monocyte recruitment into the arterial wall.¹¹ CRP can stimulate macrophages to produce the very prothrombotic tissue factor, providing yet another connection between the coagulation and inflammatory pathways.^31,32 Additionally, CRP can activate complement in atherosclerotic plaques, potentially leading to plaque instability.⁹ CRP has also been shown to induce expression of adhesion molecules, such as vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), and E-selectin on human coronary endothelial cells.⁶ In fact, CRP has the ability to sensitize endothelial cells to destruction by cytotoxic CD4⁺ T cells.³³ Elevation of CRP is also associated with endothelial dysfunction and the progression of atherosclerosis.⁸ Furthermore, CRP has also been implicated in enhanced vasoreactivity in unstable plaques.¹⁰ Therefore, through several interrelated pathways, CRP may exert deleterious effects on the vascular system.

Potentially, risk conferred by arterial inflammation will become a unifying hypothesis for the excess risk associated with a variety of disease states, such as obesity, the metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, and renal dysfunction. An abundance of adipocytes found in the obese individual may lead to increased production of interleukin-6 and downstream production of CRP.³⁴ Weight loss has been shown to decrease CRP significantly in obese postmenopausal women.³⁵ Interestingly, postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy has been shown to elevate levels of CRP, despite having beneficial effects on LDL-cholesterol levels, perhaps explaining in part the negative results of the randomized trials of hormone replacement therapy for secondary prevention.^36,37 Advanced glycation end products found in diabetes or uremia may bind to their receptor and lead to production of CRP.³⁸ Indeed, elevated levels of baseline CRP predict the development of diabetes in the future, independent of body mass index.³⁹ Thus, multiple disease states may ultimately lead to CRP expression and consequent plaque progression and destabilization, and it may be that these systemic states are more relevant to inflammatory risk than are local processes, such as an individual unstable plaque.

The combined evidence of predictive power for a variety of cardiovascular outcomes and of direct pathological involvement suggests that purposeful lowering of CRP levels could have a major impact on preventing ischemic events. If so, it would be logical to use not only a static measurement of CRP to risk stratify and allocate therapy initially, but also to follow CRP levels to gauge therapeutic effectiveness. Indeed, chronic CRP elevation increases risk of death or MI by 40% over the risk associated with CRP elevation only at the time of an ischemic event, supporting this hypothesis.⁴⁰ Despite the wealth of data that shows inflammation raises subsequent risk, however, it is currently unknown how to best treat a patient with elevated markers of inflammation.

	Effect of Medical Therapy on Inflammation

Top Introduction Inflammation as a Risk... Pathogenic Role of Inflammation Effect of Medical Therapy... Evidence for Suppressing... Need for a Clinical... References

 
There has been an appropriate push to practice evidence-based medicine in the United States. Multiple clinical trials have demonstrated the individual benefit of antiplatelet therapy, statins, ACE inhibitors, and PPAR agonists in reducing adverse events in specific cardiovascular disease states. The incremental utility of these agents, however, has not been adequately tested, with reluctance by industry to fund this type of research. Instead, the focus by pharmaceutical companies has been on demonstrating as large a benefit as possible in as wide a range of patients as is practical with one particular agent, with no regard to cost or interaction of multiple therapies. Thus, the need to combine in a rational manner multiple proven agents arises.

Aspirin has a longstanding track record as an effective antiplatelet agent across a broad range of vascular disease states.⁴¹ Its properties as an antiinflammatory agent have long been appreciated in the rheumatological literature, though typically at a high dose. In a subset of apparently healthy men in the Physicians’ Health Study, in patients within the highest quartile of CRP elevation, the benefit of 325 mg of aspirin was most significant, with a 55.7% reduction in MI.⁴² Perhaps an elevated CRP would demarcate those patients most likely to benefit from primary prevention with aspirin. Indeed, in patients with coronary artery disease, aspirin also seems to reduce levels of CRP, as well as other inflammatory markers.²⁴

Clopidogrel is a thienopyridine agent that antagonizes the adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor and has been shown to be a more potent anti-thrombotic agent than aspirin.^43,44 In addition to its effect as an antiplatelet agent, clopidogrel seems to modulate the response to inflammation. Clopidogrel decreases expression of P-selectin, which plays a key role in platelet-neutrophil crosstalk.⁴⁵ Clopidogrel has also been shown to decrease the ADP-induced expression of CD40 ligand, a pivotal mediator of platelet interaction with inflammatory cells.⁴⁶ For example, CD40 ligand on activated platelets has been shown to interact with endothelial cells, causing them to secrete chemokines and express adhesion molecules, ultimately resulting in the recruitment of leukocytes to the site of vascular injury.^47,48 Elevated levels of CD40 ligand predict an increased future risk of ischemic events in healthy individuals.⁴⁹ Even in stable coronary artery disease, there is an increase in circulating platelet-monocyte aggregates that is further amplified by ADP.⁵⁰ By interrupting the platelet– endothelial–monocyte cascade, clopidogrel may have an antiinflammatory benefit beyond just its antiplatelet action. Indeed, clopidogrel does seem to have a heightened treatment effect in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who have elevated levels of CRP.⁵¹ Certainly, the antiplatelet and antiinflammatory activities of clopidogrel (or aspirin) are inextricably linked, with platelet inhibition necessarily disrupting inflammatory pathways, and vice versa.

The hydroxy-methyl glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) have been shown to reduce ischemic events in numerous at-risk populations with varying degrees of cholesterol elevation. In fact, evidence suggests that direct antiinflammatory effects may be the primary mode of action of these agents. The recently presented Heart Protection Study suggested that there was a benefit even in patients with LDL cholesterol levels under 100 mg/dL, and this appeared to be of similar magnitude to those patients with LDL levels greater than 130 mg/dL.⁵² Statins have been proven to reduce CRP levels in several studies.^53–56 One particular statin reduced median CRP levels by 13.3% (P<0.001); whereas LDL-lowering was found to be dependent on the dose of the statin, the effect on CRP levels was not related to the specific doses studied.⁵⁴ The ability of statins to reduce CRP seems to be class-specific and not drug-specific.⁵⁷ Statins also seem beneficial in patients undergoing PCI, with the benefit seen predominantly in those with elevated CRP.^58,59

ACE-Is have shown unequivocal benefit as vasodilators in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, but recent studies have found benefit in other populations at risk of vascular disease that are out of proportion to the degree of blood pressure lowering. In fact, in a study of patients at risk of vascular disease, the benefit of the ACE-I ramipril was roughly 3 times greater than would be expected from blood pressure reduction alone.⁶⁰ These non-blood pressure-related effects are likely mediated at least in part by anti-inflammatory properties. Blood pressure elevation itself, however, leads to an increase in cytokine levels; thus, lowering of blood pressure by any means may secondarily have an affect on inflammatory markers.^61,62 ACE-Is have also been shown to have direct antiinflammatory effects in several studies. For example, the ACE-I quinapril has been shown to decrease expression of nuclear factor B, as well as interleukin-8 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in a rabbit model of atherosclerosis.⁶³ Other animal models of atherosclerosis and vascular injury have also found a benefit of ACE inhibition.⁶⁴ Therefore, use of ACE-Is guided by inflammatory markers may provide a way of identifying which patients would benefit from the non-blood pressure-related effects of ACE-Is.

PPAR- agonists, such as the fibrates, have also been shown to have a beneficial impact on patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease who have suboptimal levels of HDL cholesterol. In a secondary prevention population of patients with low HDL levels, gemfibrozil reduced the rate of MI, stroke, and death.⁶⁵ The change in HDL levels, however, only partially explained the observed benefits of gemfibrozil.⁶⁵ Potentially, antiinflammatory effects accounted for part of the benefit seen with this drug as well. Additionally, HDL may itself have antiinflammatory activity, so agents that raise HDL levels may protect against arterial inflammation through this route. In fact, part of the benefit of agents associated with CRP reduction may be due to an interaction with HDL elevation.⁶⁶ Fenofibrate has been shown to improve vascular reactivity, which correlated with CRP reduction, independent of any effect on lipid parameters.⁶⁷ Thus, use of fibrates in patients with low HDL and evidence of inflammation might be particularly efficacious.

The PPAR- agonists known as thiazolidinediones (TZDs) have been proven to be effective agents in the management of diabetes mellitus. Beyond this role, PPAR- agonists have been shown to have antiinflammatory activities.⁶⁸ For example, PPAR- agonists have been shown to inhibit the expression of the cell adhesion molecules VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 in activated endothelial cells, thereby decreasing the ability of monocytes to infiltrate into atherosclerotic plaques.⁶⁹ Additionally, anti-atherosclerotic properties have been demonstrated, such as the ability to decrease carotid artery intimal-medial thickness.^68,70 Recently, the TZD rosiglitazone was shown to lower CRP significantly when compared with placebo; of note, this reduction in CRP was paralleled by a reduction in matrix metalloproteinase-9, which is believed to play a role in plaque rupture.⁷¹ Thus, TZDs may have an important antiinflammatory and anti-atherosclerotic role in patients with vascular disease, beyond their role in treating diabetes mellitus.

	Evidence for Suppressing Inflammation Before Revascularization

Top Introduction Inflammation as a Risk... Pathogenic Role of Inflammation Effect of Medical Therapy... Evidence for Suppressing... Need for a Clinical... References

 
Elevated CRP before revascularization procedures also worsens a patient’s prognosis. Interestingly, the luminal temperature of coronary arteries correlates closely with the level of CRP, even in patients with stable coronary artery disease.⁷² Patients with elevations of CRP have a much higher rate of death and MI, but outcomes might conceivably be improved if such patients are "cooled off" with medical therapy before revascularization. In an analysis of patients undergoing angioplasty, Buffon et al²² found that all intraprocedural and in-hospital complications occurred in patients whose baseline CRP was >0.3 mg/dL. Additionally, at a 1-year follow-up, clinical restenosis occurred significantly more frequently in patients with elevated CRP (63% versus 27%, P< 0.001). The ability of elevated CRP to predict the risk of death or MI in a PCI population is beyond that of clinical or angiographic parameters.^5,23,73,74 Similar to the PCI population, in patients undergoing CABG, CRP levels >0.3 mg/dL predicted increased risk of future ischemia.⁷⁵ These data provide a logical basis for delaying elective revascularization procedures and "cooling off" patients with medical therapy to lower their state of inflammation. In fact, pretreatment with aspirin has long been appreciated to improve outcomes after angioplasty. It also seems that pretreatment with clopidogrel before the time of angioplasty or stenting decreases the rate of subsequent ischemic events, in both stable and unstable coronary artery disease.^51,76,77 There also seems to be a beneficial effect of statin therapy in reducing ischemic events when given before the time of PCI.^78,79

	Need for a Clinical Trial

Top Introduction Inflammation as a Risk... Pathogenic Role of Inflammation Effect of Medical Therapy... Evidence for Suppressing... Need for a Clinical... References

 
It is vital that the "inflammation hypothesis" be tested in a large-scale clinical trial, which has the potential to change radically the approach used with patients with cardiovascular disease. Patients with a history of cardiovascular events and an elevated baseline CRP could be randomized to either usual-care or a CRP-guided strategy. All patients would be treated with aspirin at a moderate dose of 81 to 162 mg.⁴¹ Patients with an LDL cholesterol level greater than 100 mg/dL would be treated with a statin. ACE-Is would be prescribed to patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Further therapy in the group randomized to the CRP-guided strategy would be based on a prespecified algorithm of tiered therapy and response of CRP levels to initiation of a particular medication (Figure). If CRP levels remain elevated, the next medication in the algorithm would be prescribed. If an added agent had no effect on CRP, then it would be discontinued. Additionally, patients who are to undergo elective revascularization procedures in the CRP-guided arm would receive stepwise medical therapy to achieve a reduction in repeat measurements of CRP before their procedure. In addition to evaluating the effect of such a strategy on clinical events, creation of a DNA repository on enrolled patients would allow establishment of the relationship between single nucleotide polymorphisms and haplotypes to inflammatory markers and specific drug interactions.

View larger version (31K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Potential trial design for utilization of CRP to allocate medical therapy. ACE-I indicates angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ASA, aspirin; FBG, fasting blood glucose; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HTN, hypertension; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; and LV, left ventricle. *CRP levels are measured, but the physician is blinded to the results.

The results of such a trial would validate whether an inflammation-guided strategy of tailored medical therapy can reduce death, MI, and stroke, as well as the need for revascularization and rehospitalization. As such, it could result in a major improvement in public health concomitant with a decrease in health care costs. The results would be applicable to a large cross-section of the population and could be easily implemented by clinicians everywhere.

Practicing clinicians are often skeptical about implementing the results of clinical trials, because it is often unclear if a new drug would have been effective if the patients in the trial had already been on all known optimal therapies. Therefore, an inflammation-directed trial would provide the opportunity for clinicians finally to ask if combinations of drugs really do enhance an individual patient’s care. Thus, a rational approach to stepwise pharmacotherapy and to triage for elective revascularization would potentially be validated. With well over 13 million patients who have known coronary artery disease in the United States alone, the potential impact of this trial on public health would be profound. An enlightened approach to tailoring medications to individual patients through pharmacogenomics may finally be realized. Thus, a trial of inflammation to guide noninvasive and invasive therapy could revolutionize contemporary cardiovascular practice.

	References

Top Introduction Inflammation as a Risk... Pathogenic Role of Inflammation Effect of Medical Therapy... Evidence for Suppressing... Need for a Clinical... References

 
1. Yeh ET, Anderson HV, Pasceri V, et al. C-reactive protein: linking inflammation to cardiovascular complications. Circulation. 2001; 104: 974–975.[Free Full Text]

2. Pasceri V, Yeh ET. A tale of two diseases: atherosclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis. Circulation. 1999; 100: 2124–2126.[Free Full Text]

3. Ross R. Atherosclerosis: an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 115–126.[Free Full Text]

4. Ridker PM, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, et al. C-reactive protein and other markers of inflammation in the prediction of cardiovascular disease in women. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 836–843.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Chew DP, Bhatt DL, Robbins MA, et al. Incremental prognostic value of elevated baseline C-reactive protein among established markers of risk in percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2001; 104: 992–997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Pasceri V, Willerson JT, Yeh ET. Direct proinflammatory effect of C-reactive protein on human endothelial cells. Circulation. 2000; 102: 2165–2168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Zwaka TP, Hombach V, Torzewski J. C-reactive protein-mediated low density lipoprotein uptake by macrophages: implications for atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1194–1197.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Fichtlscherer S, Rosenberger G, Walter DH, et al. Elevated C-reactive protein levels and impaired endothelial vasoreactivity in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2000; 102: 1000–1006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Yasojima K, Schwab C, McGeer EG, et al. Generation of C-Reactive protein and complement components in atherosclerotic plaques. Am J Pathol. 2001; 158: 1039–1051.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Tomai F, Crea F, Gaspardone A, et al. Unstable angina and elevated C-reactive protein levels predict enhanced vasoreactivity of the culprit lesion. Circulation. 2001; 104: 1471–1476.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Torzewski M, Rist C, Mortensen RF, et al. C-reactive protein in the arterial intima: role of C-reactive protein receptor-dependent monocyte recruitment in atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 2094–2099.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Ockene IS, Matthews CE, Rifai N, et al. Variability and classification accuracy of serial high-sensitivity C-reactive protein measurements in healthy adults. Clin Chem. 2001; 47: 444–450.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Meier-Ewert HK, Ridker PM, Rifai N, et al. Absence of diurnal variation of C-reactive protein concentrations in healthy human subjects. Clin Chem. 2001; 47: 426–430.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Koukkunen H, Penttila K, Kemppainen A, et al. C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, interleukin-6 and tumour necrosis factor-alpha in the prognostic classification of unstable angina pectoris. Ann Med. 2001; 33: 37–47.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Vorchheimer DA, Fuster V. Inflammatory markers in coronary artery disease: let prevention douse the flames. JAMA. 2001; 286: 2154–2156.[Free Full Text]

16. Biasucci LM, Liuzzo G, Grillo RL, et al. Elevated levels of C-reactive protein at discharge in patients with unstable angina predict recurrent instability. Circulation. 1999; 99: 855–860.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Tommasi S, Carluccio E, Bentivoglio M, et al. C-reactive protein as a marker for cardiac ischemic events in the year after a first, uncomplicated myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 83: 1595–1599.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Heeschen C, Hamm CW, Bruemmer J, et al. Predictive value of C-reactive protein and troponin T in patients with unstable angina: a comparative analysis. CAPTURE Investigators. Chimeric c7E3 Antiplatelet Therapy in Unstable Angina Refractory to Standard Treatment Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35: 1535–1542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Morrow DA, Rifai N, Antman EM, et al. C-reactive protein is a potent predictor of mortality independently of and in combination with troponin T in acute coronary syndromes: a TIMI 11A substudy. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 31: 1460–1465.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Lindahl B, Toss H, Siegbahn A, et al. Markers of myocardial damage and inflammation in relation to long-term mortality in unstable coronary artery disease. FRISC Study Group. Fragmin During Instability in Coronary Artery Disease. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 1139–1147.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Katritsis D, Korovesis S, Giazitzoglou E, et al. C-reactive protein concentrations and angiographic characteristics of coronary lesions. Clin Chem. 2001; 47: 882–886.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Buffon A, Liuzzo G, Biasucci LM, et al. Preprocedural serum levels of C-reactive protein predict early complications and late restenosis after coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 34: 1512–1521.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Gaspardone A, Crea F, Versaci F, et al. Predictive value of C-reactive protein after successful coronary artery stenting in patients with stable angina. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 82: 515–518.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Ikonomidis I, Andreotti F, Economou E, et al. Increased proinflammatory cytokines in patients with chronic stable angina and their reduction by aspirin. Circulation. 1999; 100: 793–798.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Bazzino O, Ferreiros ER, Pizarro R, et al. C-reactive protein and the stress test for risk stratification of patients recovering from unstable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 2001; 87: 1235–1239.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Zebrack JS, Muhlestein JB, Horne BD, et al. C-reactive protein and angiographic coronary artery disease: independent and additive predictors of risk in subjects with angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39: 632–637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Di Napoli M, Papa F, Bocola V. C-reactive protein in ischemic stroke: an independent prognostic factor. Stroke. 2001; 32: 917–924.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, et al. Plasma concentration of C-reactive protein and risk of developing peripheral vascular disease. Circulation. 1998; 97: 425–428.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Ridker PM, Stampfer MJ, Rifai N. Novel risk factors for systemic atherosclerosis: a comparison of C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, homocysteine, lipoprotein(a), and standard cholesterol screening as predictors of peripheral arterial disease. JAMA. 2001; 285: 2481–2485.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Rohde LE, Hennekens CH, Ridker PM. Survey of C-reactive protein and cardiovascular risk factors in apparently healthy men. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 84: 1018–1122.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Nakagomi A, Freedman SB, Geczy CL. Interferon-gamma and lipopolysaccharide potentiate monocyte tissue factor induction by C-reactive protein: relationship with age, sex, and hormone replacement treatment. Circulation. 2000; 101: 1785–1791.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Penn MS, Topol EJ. Tissue factor, the emerging link between inflammation, thrombosis, and vascular remodeling. Circ Res. 2001; 89: 1–2.[Free Full Text]

33. Nakajima T, Schulte S, Warrington KJ, et al. T-cell-mediated lysis of endothelial cells in acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2002; 105: 570–575.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Yudkin JS, Kumari M, Humphries SE, et al. Inflammation, obesity, stress and coronary heart disease: is interleukin-6 the link? Atherosclerosis. 2000; 148: 209–214.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Tchernof A, Nolan A, Sites CK, et al. Weight loss reduces C-reactive protein levels in obese postmenopausal women. Circulation. 2002; 105: 564–569.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Cushman M, Legault C, Barrett-Connor E, et al. Effect of postmenopausal hormones on inflammation-sensitive proteins: the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Study. Circulation. 1999; 100: 717–722.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Herrington DM, Brosnihan KB, Pusser BE, et al. Differential effects of E and droloxifene on C-reactive protein and other markers of inflammation in healthy postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001; 86: 4216–4222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Schwedler S, Schinzel R, Vaith P, et al. Inflammation and advanced glycation end products in uremia: simple coexistence, potentiation or causal relationship? Kidney Int. 2001; 59 (suppl 78): S32–S36.[CrossRef]

39. Pradhan AD, Manson JE, Rifai N, et al. C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, and risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2001; 286: 327–334.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Kervinen H, Palosuo T, Manninen V, et al. Joint effects of C-reactive protein and other risk factors on acute coronary events. Am Heart J. 2001; 141: 580–585.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

41. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ. 2002; 324: 71–86.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, et al. Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 973–979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

43. CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet. 1996; 348: 1329–1339.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

44. Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 494–502.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Moshfegh K, Redondo M, Julmy F, et al. Antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel compared with aspirin after myocardial infarction: enhanced inhibitory effects of combination therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 699–705.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

46. Hermann A, Rauch BH, Braun M, et al. Platelet CD40 ligand (CD40L): subcellular localization, regulation of expression, and inhibition by clopidogrel. Platelets. 2001; 12: 74–82.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

47. Henn V, Slupsky JR, Grafe M, et al. CD40 ligand on activated platelets triggers an inflammatory reaction of endothelial cells. Nature. 1998; 391: 591–594.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

48. Phipps RP. Atherosclerosis: the emerging role of inflammation and the CD40-CD40 ligand system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 6930–6932.[Free Full Text]

49. Schonbeck U, Varo N, Libby P, et al. Soluble CD40L and cardiovascular risk in women. Circulation. 2001; 104: 2266–2268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

50. Furman MI, Benoit SE, Barnard MR, et al. Increased platelet reactivity and circulating monocyte-platelet aggregates in patients with stable coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 31: 352–358.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

51. Chew DP, Bhatt DL, Robbins MA, et al. Effect of clopidogrel added to aspirin before percutaneous coronary intervention on the risk associated with C-reactive protein. Am J Cardiol. 2001; 88: 672–674.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

52. Collins R, Peto R, Armitage J. The MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study: preliminary results. Int J Clin Pract. 2002; 56: 53–56.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

53. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Pfeffer MA, et al. Long-term effects of pravastatin on plasma concentration of C-reactive protein. The Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) Investigators. Circulation. 1999; 100: 230–235.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

54. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Lowenthal SP. Rapid reduction in C-reactive protein with cerivastatin among 785 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1191–1193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

55. Albert MA, Danielson E, Rifai N, et al. Effect of statin therapy on C-reactive protein levels: the pravastatin inflammation/CRP evaluation (PRINCE): a randomized trial and cohort study. JAMA. 2001; 286: 64–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

56. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Clearfield M, et al. Measurement of C-reactive protein for the targeting of statin therapy in the primary prevention of acute coronary events. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 1959–1965.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

57. Jialal I, Stein D, Balis D, et al. Effect of hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor therapy on high sensitive C-reactive protein levels. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1933–1935.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

58. Horne BD, Muhlestein JB, Carlquist JF, et al. Statin therapy, lipid levels, C-reactive protein and the survival of patients with angiographically severe coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 1774–1780.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

59. Walter DH, Fichtlscherer S, Britten MB, et al. Statin therapy, inflammation and recurrent coronary events in patients following coronary stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 2006–2012.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

60. Sleight P, Yusuf S, Pogue J, et al. Blood-pressure reduction and cardiovascular risk in HOPE study. Lancet. 2001; 358: 2130–2131.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

61. Chae CU, Lee RT, Rifai N, et al. Blood pressure and inflammation in apparently healthy men. Hypertension. 2001; 38: 399–403.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

62. Doo Y, Kim D, Oh D, et al. Effect of beta-blockers on expression of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein in patients with unstable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 2001; 88: 422–424.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

63. Hernandez-Presa MA, Bustos C, Ortego M, et al. ACE inhibitor quinapril reduces the arterial expression of NF-B- dependent proinflammatory factors but not of collagen I in a rabbit model of atherosclerosis. Am J Pathol. 1998; 153: 1825–1837.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

64. Akishita M, Shirakami G, Iwai M, et al. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor restrains inflammation-induced vascular injury in mice. J Hypertens. 2001; 19: 1083–1088.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

65. Robins SJ, Collins D, Wittes JT, et al. Relation of gemfibrozil treatment and lipid levels with major coronary events: VA-HIT: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001; 285: 1585–1591.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

66. Strandberg TE, Vanhanen H, Tikkanen MJ. Associations between change in C-reactive protein and serum lipids during statin treatment. Ann Med. 2000; 32: 579–583.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

67. Malik J, Melenovsky V, Wichterle D, et al. Both fenofibrate and atorvastatin improve vascular reactivity in combined hyperlipidaemia (Fenofibrate Versus Atorvastatin Trial–FAT). Cardiovasc Res. 2001; 52: 290–298.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

68. Aizawa Y, Kawabe J, Hasebe N, et al. Pioglitazone enhances cytokine-induced apoptosis in vascular smooth muscle cells and reduces intimal hyperplasia. Circulation. 2001; 104: 455–460.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

69. Pasceri V, Wu HD, Willerson JT, et al. Modulation of vascular inflammation in vitro and in vivo by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activators. Circulation. 2000; 101: 235–238.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

70. Koshiyama H, Shimono D, Kuwamura N, et al. Rapid communication: inhibitory effect of pioglitazone on carotid arterial wall thickness in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001; 86: 3452–3456.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

71. Haffner SM, Greenberg A, Weston W, et al. Effects of rosiglitazone treatment on levels of C-reactive protein and MMP9 in patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Circulation. 2001; 104: II-117.

72. Stefanadis C, Diamantopoulos L, Vlachopoulos C, et al. Thermal heterogeneity within human atherosclerotic coronary arteries detected in vivo: a new method of detection by application of a special thermography catheter. Circulation. 1999; 99: 1965–1971.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

73. Versaci F, Gaspardone A, Tomai F, et al. Predictive value of C-reactive protein in patients with unstable angina pectoris undergoing coronary artery stent implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 85: 92–95.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

74. Walter DH, Fichtlscherer S, Sellwig M, et al. Preprocedural C-reactive protein levels and cardiovascular events after coronary stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 839–846.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

75. Milazzo D, Biasucci LM, Luciani N, et al. Elevated levels of C-reactive protein before coronary artery bypass grafting predict recurrence of ischemic events. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 84: 459–461.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

76. Assali AR, Salloum J, Sdringola S, et al. Effects of clopidogrel pretreatment before percutaneous coronary intervention in patients treated with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (abciximab or tirofiban). Am J Cardiol. 2001; 88: 884–886.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

77. Mehta SR, Yusuf S, Peters RJ, et al. Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long- term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-CURE study. Lancet. 2001; 358: 527–533.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

78. Serruys PW, Foley DP, Jackson G, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of fluvastatin for prevention of restenosis after successful coronary balloon angioplasty; final results of the fluvastatin angiographic restenosis (FLARE) trial. Eur Heart J. 1999; 20: 58–69.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

79. Chan AW, Bhatt DL, Chew DP, et al. Early and sustained survival benefit associated with statin therapy at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2002; 105: 691–696.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Ramaraj Gender Differences Between High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Intima Media Thickness Progression Stroke, April 1, 2008; 39(4): e73 - e73. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. K. Ray, C. P. Cannon, R. Cairns, D. A. Morrow, N. Rifai, A. J. Kirtane, C. H. McCabe, A. M. Skene, C. M. Gibson, P. M. Ridker, et al. Relationship Between Uncontrolled Risk Factors and C-Reactive Protein Levels in Patients Receiving Standard or Intensive Statin Therapy for Acute Coronary Syndromes in the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 Trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 18, 2005; 46(8): 1417 - 1424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. Bhatt and E. J. Topol Periprocedural Cardiac Enzyme Elevation Predicts Adverse Outcomes Circulation, August 9, 2005; 112(6): 906 - 922. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Biasucci CDC/AHA Workshop on Markers of Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease: Application to Clinical and Public Health Practice: Clinical Use of Inflammatory Markers in Patients With Cardiovascular Diseases: A Background Paper Circulation, December 21, 2004; 110(25): e560 - e567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S Kony, M Zureik, F Driss, C Neukirch, B Leynaert, and F Neukirch Association of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and lung function with C-reactive protein (CRP): a population based study Thorax, October 1, 2004; 59(10): 892 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Mills and D. L. Bhatt The yin and yang of arterial inflammation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 7, 2004; 44(1): 50 - 52. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. D. Brook, B. Franklin, W. Cascio, Y. Hong, G. Howard, M. Lipsett, R. Luepker, M. Mittleman, J. Samet, S. C. Smith Jr, et al. Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Disease: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Expert Panel on Population and Prevention Science of the American Heart Association Circulation, June 1, 2004; 109(21): 2655 - 2671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Panichi, U. Maggiore, D. Taccola, M. Migliori, G. M. Rizza, C. Consani, A. Bertini, S. Sposini, R. Perez-Garcia, P. Rindi, et al. Interleukin-6 is a stronger predictor of total and cardiovascular mortality than C-reactive protein in haemodialysis patients Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1154 - 1160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. Brown, K. K. Desai, B. A. Vakili, C. Nouneh, H.-M. Lee, and L. M. Golub Clinical and Biochemical Results of the Metalloproteinase Inhibition with Subantimicrobial Doses of Doxycycline to Prevent Acute Coronary Syndromes (MIDAS) Pilot Trial Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2004; 24(4): 733 - 738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. Bhatt Aspirin resistance: more than just a laboratory curiosity J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 17, 2004; 43(6): 1127 - 1129. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Verma, M. R. Buchanan, and T. J. Anderson Endothelial Function Testing as a Biomarker of Vascular Disease Circulation, October 28, 2003; 108(17): 2054 - 2059. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H S Gurm, D L Bhatt, A M Lincoff, J E Tcheng, D J Kereiakes, N S Kleiman, G Jia, and E J Topol Impact of preprocedural white blood cell count on long term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the EPIC, EPILOG, and EPISTENT trials Heart, October 1, 2003; 89(10): 1200 - 1204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. G. Hackam and S. S. Anand Emerging Risk Factors for Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: A Critical Review of the Evidence JAMA, August 20, 2003; 290(7): 932 - 940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Morrow and E. Braunwald Future of Biomarkers in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Moving Toward a Multimarker Strategy Circulation, July 22, 2003; 108(3): 250 - 252. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. H. Gunawardana, R. L. Basser, I. D. Davis, J. Cebon, P. Mitchell, C. Underhill, T. J. Kilpatrick, K. Reardon, M. D. Green, P. Bardy, et al. A Phase I Study of Recombinant Human Leukemia Inhibitory Factor in Patients with Advanced Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2003; 9(6): 2056 - 2065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-H. Wang, S.-H. Li, R. D. Weisel, P. W.M. Fedak, A. S. Dumont, P. Szmitko, R.-K. Li, D. A.G. Mickle, and S. Verma C-Reactive Protein Upregulates Angiotensin Type 1 Receptors in Vascular Smooth Muscle Circulation, April 8, 2003; 107(13): 1783 - 1790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. W. Chan, D. L. Bhatt, D. P. Chew, J. Reginelli, J. P. Schneider, E. J. Topol, and S. G. Ellis Relation of Inflammation and Benefit of Statins After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Circulation, April 8, 2003; 107(13): 1750 - 1756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Kennedy and A.M. Buchan Ever Decreasing Circles: Advances in Antiplatelet Therapy and Anticoagulation Stroke, February 1, 2003; 34(2): 348 - 350. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M Ridker Clinical Application of C-Reactive Protein for Cardiovascular Disease Detection and Prevention Circulation, January 28, 2003; 107(3): 363 - 369. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. K. Yarlagadda and W. E. Boden Cardioprotective effects of an early invasive strategy for non-ST-segment elevationacute coronary syndromes: Are we all becoming "interventional" cardiologists? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 4, 2002; 40(11): 1915 - 1918. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Mosca C-Reactive Protein -- To Screen or Not to Screen? N. Engl. J. Med., November 14, 2002; 347(20): 1615 - 1617. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. Bhatt, E. J. Topol, I. Kushner, and A. Sehgal The Arterial Inflammation Hypothesis Arch Intern Med, October 28, 2002; 162(19): 2249 - 2251. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Extract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bhatt, D. L. Articles by Topol, E. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bhatt, D. L. Articles by Topol, E. J. Related Collections Secondary prevention Risk Factors Mechanism of atherosclerosis/growth factors