(Circulation. 2001;103:779.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
In the article by Sakamaki et al that appeared in a
previous issue of the journal
(Circulation.
2000;102:27202725), Table 1
contained errors. The corrected
Table
follows.
|
In the article by Pauletto et al that appeared in a previous issue of the journal (Circulation. 2000;102:771778), a measurement was reported incorrectly. In the Methods section under Immunocytochemistry and Image Analysis (p 772, first full paragraph in second column), the reported area of 70 µm2 used for plaque consideration should have been reported as 7x103 µm2. The corrected information follows:
For cell count, we considered 3 standard areas (7x103 µm2) of the plaque: the basal, the shoulder, and the cap regions. In 65% of the specimens, it was possible to clearly distinguish and analyze some of the media layer underneath the plaque. In these cases, 3 random fields (7x103 µm2) were considered.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |