This Article Extract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation

(Circulation. 1999;100:330.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.

Correction

Correction

	Introduction

Top Introduction

 
In the article by Munoz et al that appeared in a previous issue of the journal (Circulation. 1999;99:81–89), Figure 2 contained an error. The correct figure appears here.

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Meta-analysis results evaluating ORs and 95% Cls for high-dose aprotinin, low-dose aprotinin, and -aminocaproic acid with respect to the given outcome variables.

This Article Extract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation