(Circulation. 1999;99:354-360.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Cardiology Branch (K.K.K., C.C., M.N.B., L.H., J.A.P., R.O.C.) and the Office of Biostatistics Research (M.A.W.), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and the Clinical Pathology Department (G.C.), Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.
Correspondence to Dr Richard O. Cannon III, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 7B15, 10 Center Dr MSC-1650, Bethesda, MD 20892-1650. E-mail cannonr{at}gwgate.nhlbi.nih.gov
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsWe randomly assigned 28 women to conjugated
equine estrogen (CE) 0.625 mg, simvastatin 10 mg, and their
combination daily for 6 weeks. Compared with respective baseline
values, simvastatin alone and combined with CE reduced LDL
cholesterol to a greater extent than CE alone (both
P<0.05). CE alone and combined with
simvastatin raised HDL cholesterol and lowered
lipoprotein(a) to a greater extent than simvastatin alone
(all P<0.05). Flow-mediated dilation of the brachial
artery (by ultrasonography) improved (all P<0.001
versus baseline values) on CE (4.0±2.6% to 10.2±3.9%),
simvastatin (4.3±2.4% to 10.0±3.9%), and CE combined
with simvastatin (4.6±2.0% to 9.8±2.6%), but similarly
among therapies (P=0.507 by ANOVA). None of the
therapies improved the dilator response to
nitroglycerin (all P
0.184). Only
therapies including CE lowered levels of plasminogen
activator inhibitor type 1 and the cell
adhesion molecule E-selectin (all P<0.05 versus
simvastatin).
ConclusionsAlthough estrogen and statin therapies have differing effects on lipoprotein levels, specific improvement in endothelium-dependent vasodilator responsiveness is similar. However, only therapies including estrogen improved markers of fibrinolysis and vascular inflammation. Thus, estrogen therapy appears to have unique properties that may benefit the vasculature of hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women, even if they are already on cholesterol-lowering therapy.
Key Words: lipoproteins endothelium hormones cell adhesion molecules fibrinolysis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Thus, because the lipoprotein effects that could influence nitric oxide bioactivity differ between estrogen and statin therapies and because estrogen may directly stimulate the release of nitric oxide, as shown in endothelial cells in culture,17 18 19 20 it is possible that the impact of these therapies on nitric oxide bioactivity and its subsequent effects on endothelial homeostasis may differ. Furthermore, because the mechanisms of the biological effects of these therapies differ, the combination of the therapies may be additive, an effect of potential importance to women at high risk for atherosclerosis or with established atherosclerotic disease. Thus, this study was designed to assess the effect of these therapies, independently and in combination, on vascular function in hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Laboratory Assays
Blood samples for laboratory assays were obtained between 8:00
and 9:00 AM after overnight fasting (including caffeine)
and with the patient recumbent for at least 15 minutes before and at
the end of each treatment period and were immediately coded so that
investigators performing laboratory assays were blinded to subject
identity and study sequence. Plasma estrone and 17ß-estradiol levels
were measured by radioimmunoassay. All samples were stored at -70°C
until analysis. Total cholesterol and
glycerol-blanked triglycerides in the serum were quantified
by automated enzymatic techniques. Serum HDL cholesterol
was quantified after dextran sulfate precipitation of other
lipoproteins. Serum LDL cholesterol levels were directly
quantified by an immunoabsorption method. Serum lipoprotein(a) levels
were measured by an immunoturbidimetric assay (Incstar) with a lower
limit of detectability of 4.9 mg/dL. Serum nitrate/nitrite levels were
measured in triplicate by conversion of nitrate
(NO3-) to nitrite
(NO2-) by nitrate reductase,
followed by addition of Griess reagents and photometric measurement of
absorbance (Oxford Biomedical Research). Intercellular adhesion
molecule (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1), and
E-selectin levels were measured in triplicate by ELISA (R and D
systems). Plasminogen activator
inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) antigen levels were determined in
duplicate by a sandwich ELISA (Biopool).
Vascular Studies
Imaging studies of the left brachial artery were performed with
a Hewlett-Packard SONOS 2500 ultrasound machine equipped with a 7.5-MHz
linear-array transducer after 10 minutes of rest before and at the end
of each of the 3 treatment periods.23 Imaging of the
artery proximal to the antecubital fossa was done longitudinally, with
the center of the artery identified by the clearest visualization of
the anterior and posterior intimal layers. The transmit (focus) zone
was set to the depth of the near wall.24 Depth and gain
settings were set to optimize images of the interface between the lumen
and the arterial wall; images were magnified by use of a
resolution box function. After a satisfactory transducer position was
found, the skin was marked, and the arm remained in that position
throughout the study. A baseline measurement of brachial artery
diameter was made, as well as a baseline measurement of the velocity of
arterial flow by pulsed Doppler with the range gate
(1.5 mm) in the center of the artery. The system permitted a
direct assessment of the angle between the blood stream and the
intersecting ultrasound beam, which was then used to calculate blood
flow velocity. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was
assessed by measuring the change in the diameter of the brachial artery
after 60 seconds of reactive hyperemia relative to baseline
measurements after deflation of a cuff on the forearm inflated to
250 mm Hg for 5 minutes, a response previously shown to be
mediated primarily by nitric oxide.25 Arterial
flow velocity was measured for the first 15 seconds after cuff
deflation. After baseline conditions had been reestablished 10 to 15
minutes later, measurements of arterial diameter and flow
velocity were repeated, followed by nitroglycerin at a
dose of 0.4 mg administered by spray under the tongue to assess
endothelium-independent vasodilation. Three minutes
later, repeat measurements of arterial diameter and flow
velocity were made. All images were coded and recorded on VHS
videotape for subsequent blinded analysis. Arterial
diameter was measured in millimeters as the distance between the
anterior wall media-adventitial interface ("m" line) and the
posterior wall intima-lumen interface at end diastole,
coincident with the R wave on the ECG at 2 sites along the artery and
for 3 cardiac cycles, with these 6 measurements averaged. Blood flow
was calculated by multiplying the velocity-time integral of the
Doppler flow signal by the heart rate and the cross-sectional
area of the vessel. Sixteen studies were independently analyzed
on 2 occasions; intraobserver correlation for maximum diameter was 0.97
and for percent dilation 0.78.
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean±SD. Student's paired t
test was used to compare values before and after each treatment and the
relative changes in values in response to treatment. The effects of CE,
simvastatin, and the two combined were analyzed by
1-way repeated-measures ANOVA. Post hoc comparisons between different
treatment pairs were made by the Student-Newman-Keuls
multiple-comparison procedures. Pearson correlation coefficient
analysis was used to assess associations between values.
Friedman repeated-measures ANOVA on ranks was used to compare the
effects of CE, simvastatin, and the two combined on
lipoprotein(a) levels. The comparison of
endothelium-dependent dilation among the 3 treatment
schemes was prospectively designated as the primary end point of the
study. All other comparisons were considered secondary end points.
Therefore, probability values less than the Bonferroni-adjusted
of
0.05/3=0.017 are deemed as statistically significant for the primary
hypothesis. No adjustments were made for the number of secondary
hypotheses.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Effects of Treatments on Lipoproteins
All therapies lowered total and LDL cholesterol levels
from baseline values (all P<0.001, Table 1
), with
greater effect on LDL cholesterol for
simvastatin (-25±14%) and CE combined with
simvastatin (-32±14%) than for CE alone (-11±11%;
both P<0.05 versus CE alone). The differences in effects of
therapies on apolipoprotein B levels were similar. In contrast, only
therapies with CE alone or combined with simvastatin
increased HDL cholesterol levels (both 17±15% from
baseline values; both P<0.05 versus simvastatin
alone). All therapies increased apolipoprotein A-I levels from baseline
values (all P<0.02) and to a similar degree
(P=0.367 by ANOVA). The ratio of LDL to HDL
cholesterol levels and the ratio of the apolipoproteins to
these lipoproteins decreased to a greater degree on
simvastatin combined with CE than with CE or
simvastatin alone (Figure 1
).
Only CE alone or combined with simvastatin lowered
lipoprotein(a) levels from baseline values (both P<0.05
versus simvastatin alone, Table 1
). Only
simvastatin alone significantly reduced
triglyceride levels (-7±43%; P=0.023);
therapies including CE did not significantly change these levels from
baseline values (both P<0.05 versus simvastatin
alone).
|
Effects of Treatments on Vasomotor Function
Brachial artery diameter and basal forearm blood flow were similar
during each treatment period (P=0.490 and P=0.105
by ANOVA, respectively), as were the peak forearm blood flow and
brachial artery diameter during reactive hyperemia
(P=0.941 and P=0.248 by ANOVA, respectively;
Table 2
). All therapies increased flow-mediated dilation
relative to baseline measurements (Figure 2
) and to a similar degree
(P=0.507 by ANOVA). The brachial artery dilator responses to
nitroglycerin were similar for all therapies
(P=0.878 by ANOVA) and were not significantly increased
compared with respective baseline values (P=0.851 for CE
alone, P=0.534 for simvastatin alone,
P=0.184 for the two combined). Improvement in flow-mediated
dilation did not correlate strongly with changes in lipoprotein levels
during any of the treatment periods (all r
0.366). CE
increased serum nitrate/nitrite levels by 5±38%, but the degree of
change was not significant compared with pretreatment values (Table 2
). Simvastatin alone and simvastatin
combined with CE lowered serum nitrate/nitrite levels with marginal
significance, by 5±37% and 6±30%, respectively (P=0.104
and P=0.109 versus baseline values), albeit without
significant differences among therapies (P=0.441 by ANOVA).
Improvement in flow-mediated dilation did not correlate with changes in
serum nitrate/nitrite levels during any of the treatment periods (all
r<0.053).
|
Effects of Treatment on Markers of Fibrinolysis
and Inflammation
Only CE alone or combined with simvastatin lowered
plasma PAI-1 levels from baseline values (P<0.01 and
P<0.05, respectively; Table 2
), and these effects
were greater than with simvastatin alone (Figure 3
). CE alone or combined with
simvastatin decreased E-selectin levels by 17±14% and
18±16%, respectively (both P<0.001 versus baseline
values), and the effect was greater than with simvastatin
alone (Figure 4A
). CE alone or combined
with simvastatin decreased VCAM-1 levels by 14±21% and
11±19%, respectively (P=0.003 and P=0.001
versus baseline values), although these effects were not significantly
greater than with simvastatin alone (Figure 4B
). CE
combined with simvastatin decreased ICAM-1 levels by
8±15% (P=0.003 versus baseline values), an effect
significantly greater than with simvastatin administered
alone (Figure 4C
). Changes in cell adhesion molecule levels on
therapies containing CE did not correlate strongly with changes in
lipoprotein levels (all r
0.164), flow-mediated dilation
(all r
0.350), or serum nitrate/nitrite levels (all
r
0.333).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We reasoned that differing effects of estrogen and statin therapies on lipoproteins that have been shown to affect vascular function might result in differential effects on endothelium-dependent vasodilator responsiveness, with possible additive effects when the therapies are combined. Indeed, CE significantly improved flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery, an effect consistent with enhanced release of nitric oxide.25 Nitrate/nitrite levels, which reflect in part the luminal release of nitric oxide,22 were marginally reduced with simvastatin alone or combined with CE, but not with CE alone. Reduction in luminal release of nitric oxide after statin therapy may indicate reduced synthesis of nitric oxide required for endothelial homeostasis as a consequence of reduced degradation of nitric oxide by oxidized lipoproteins and free radical molecules from the endothelium and from inflammatory cells.26 In contrast, CE did not lower nitrate/nitrite levels in our study participants, despite significant reductions in LDL cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) levels and may reflect competing stimuli to reduce and increase nitric oxide synthesis.
To determine the extent of vascular effects of CE and statin therapies, we measured markers of fibrinolysis and inflammation considered important in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. CE alone or combined with simvastatin reduced PAI-1 levels. In a previous study, we demonstrated that the relative reduction in PAI-1 levels on CE was significantly associated with comparable increases in levels of D-dimer, a product of cross-linked fibrin degradation by plasmin, providing evidence of enhanced fibrinolysis.27 In contrast to the effects of CE, simvastatin did not change PAI-1 levels, consistent with the observation of Zambrana et al28 in 21 hyperlipemic heart transplant patients. However, Isaacsohn et al29 observed a decrease in plasma PAI-1 levels in hypercholesterolemic patients (menopausal status of women not reported) treated with high doses of lovastatin (up to 80 mg/d).
Cell adhesion molecules are expressed after transcriptional activation by a variety of proinflammatory stimuli, including cytokines30 and oxidized LDL.31 32 These molecules are then positioned across the endothelial cell membrane and bind to ligands on inflammatory cells and facilitate their subsequent entry into the vessel wall. 17ß-Estradiol has been shown in endothelial cell cultures to inhibit the expression of cell adhesion molecules in one study33 but to promote their expression in another study.34 Experimental evidence suggests that cell adhesion molecules, once expressed on the endothelial cell surface, may be shed from the surface. Several groups have reported the presence of E-selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 in the culture supernatant within 4 to 6 hours of endothelial or leukocyte cell activation35 36 37 and in sera of humans as shown by the same monoclonal antibody assay as used to demonstrate adhesion molecules in the supernatant of activated endothelial cells in culture.36 37 38 Serum concentrations of E-selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 have been reported to be higher in patients with coronary artery disease38 39 40 and dyslipidemia41 than in healthy control subjects. Although the biological function in sera remains unclear, the clinical relevance of cell adhesion molecules has been suggested by several observational studies. Thus, E-selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 have been demonstrated in human coronary atherosclerotic arteries by immunohistochemistry.42 In the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, higher serum levels of E-selectin and ICAM-1 were found in patients with coronary heart disease and carotid artery atherosclerosis than in healthy control subjects: E-selectin levels correlated positively with the carotid artery thickness measured by ultrasound in this study.40 Belch et al43 reported that patients who underwent peripheral artery balloon angioplasty and developed restenosis at higher serum levels of E-selectin than patients without restenosis. Recently, men in the Physician's Health Study with the highest quartile of ICAM-1 levels were found to be of greater cardiovascular risk than men in the lowest quartile; E-selectin levels were not reported in this study.44 We found that only therapies including CE alone or combined with statin therapy significantly reduced E-selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 levels from respective pretreatment values. These findings are consistent with the recent report of Caulin-Glaser et al,41 who found that men and postmenopausal women not on hormone therapy who had coronary artery disease shown by coronary angiography had higher levels of soluble cell adhesion molecules than men and women without coronary artery disease or postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease who were current users of hormone therapy.
The mechanisms by which CE therapies, but not simvastatin alone, reduced levels of cell adhesion molecules cannot be determined from our study, but they are probably independent of nitric oxide, because nitric oxide bioactivity as manifest by improvement in brachial artery flow-mediated dilation was increased equally by simvastatin and CE therapies from respective pretreatment values. Of interest, a recent study showed that HDL, levels of which were significantly increased in our study with therapies including CE but not simvastatin alone, inhibits cytokine-induced expression of cell adhesion molecules in cultured endothelial cells.45 Furthermore, CE therapies, but not simvastatin alone, reduced levels of lipoprotein(a), recently shown to stimulate the expression of ICAM-1 in cultured endothelial cells.46
We conclude from our study that although estrogen and statin therapies at the dosages used have differing effects on lipoprotein levels, improvement in endothelium-dependent responsiveness is similar. However, only therapies including estrogen improved other vascular homeostatic factors potentially important in atherogenesis. Thus, estrogen therapy may provide vasculoprotective benefit to hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women, even if they are already on statin therapy.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received June 19, 1998; revision received October 5, 1998; accepted October 9, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. E. Wierman and W. M. Kohrt Review Article: Vascular and Metabolic Effects of Sex Steroids: New Insights Into Clinical Trials Reproductive Sciences, May 1, 2007; 14(4): 300 - 314. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J Roman, T. Z Naqvi, J. M Gardin, M. Gerhard-Herman, M. Jaff, and E. Mohler American Society of Echocardiography Report: Clinical application of noninvasive vascular ultrasound in cardiovascular risk stratification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology Vascular Medicine, August 1, 2006; 11(3): 201 - 211. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S R Davis, I Dinatale, L Rivera-Woll, and S Davison Postmenopausal hormone therapy: from monkey glands to transdermal patches J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2005; 185(2): 207 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Bots, J. Westerink, T. J. Rabelink, and E. J.P. de Koning Assessment of flow-mediated vasodilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery: effects of technical aspects of the FMD measurement on the FMD response Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2005; 26(4): 363 - 368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Koh, M. J. Quon, S. H. Han, W.-J. Chung, J. Y. Ahn, Y.-H. Seo, M. H. Kang, T. H. Ahn, I. S. Choi, and E. K. Shin Additive Beneficial Effects of Losartan Combined With Simvastatin in the Treatment of Hypercholesterolemic, Hypertensive Patients Circulation, December 14, 2004; 110(24): 3687 - 3692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Doherty, L. A. Fitzpatrick, D. Inoue, J.-H. Qiao, M. C. Fishbein, R. C. Detrano, P. K. Shah, and T. B. Rajavashisth Molecular, Endocrine, and Genetic Mechanisms of Arterial Calcification Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2004; 25(4): 629 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Koh, J. W. Son, J. Y. Ahn, D. S. Kim, D. K. Jin, H. S. Kim, S. H. Han, Y.-H. Seo, W.-J. Chung, W. C. Kang, et al. Simvastatin Combined With Ramipril Treatment in Hypercholesterolemic Patients Hypertension, August 1, 2004; 44(2): 180 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Koh and I. Sakuma Should Progestins Be Blamed for the Failure of Hormone Replacement Therapy to Reduce Cardiovascular Events in Randomized Controlled Trials? Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 2004; 24(7): 1171 - 1179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Fitzpatrick Hormones and the Heart: Controversies and Conundrums J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2003; 88(12): 5609 - 5610. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Balk, J. Lau, L. C. Goudas, H. S. Jordan, B. Kupelnick, L. U. Kim, and R. H. Karas Effects of Statins on Nonlipid Serum Markers Associated with Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review Ann Intern Med, October 21, 2003; 139(8): 670 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Koh, J. Y. Ahn, S. H. Han, D. S. Kim, D. K. Jin, H. S. Kim, M.-S. Shin, T. H. Ahn, I. S. Choi, and E. K. Shin Pleiotropic effects of angiotensin II receptor blocker in hypertensive patients J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 3, 2003; 42(5): 905 - 910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Davison and S. R. Davis New Markers for Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Women: Impact of Endogenous Estrogen Status and Exogenous Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2003; 88(6): 2470 - 2478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Kimoto, T. Shoji, K. Shinohara, M. Inaba, Y. Okuno, T. Miki, H. Koyama, M. Emoto, and Y. Nishizawa Preferential Stiffening of Central Over Peripheral Arteries in Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes, February 1, 2003; 52(2): 448 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Stangl, G. Baumann, and K. Stangl Coronary atherogenic risk factors in women Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2002; 23(22): 1738 - 1752. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Evans, H. A. Harris, C. P. Miller, S. K. Karathanasis, and S. J. Adelman Estrogen Receptors {alpha} and {beta} Have Similar Activities in Multiple Endothelial Cell Pathways Endocrinology, October 1, 2002; 143(10): 3785 - 3795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lemay, S. Dodin, N. Kadri, H. Jacques, and J.-C. Forest Flaxseed Dietary Supplement Versus Hormone Replacement Therapy in Hypercholesterolemic Menopausal Women Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2002; 100(3): 495 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Koh, J. W. Son, J. Y. Ahn, D. K. Jin, H. S. Kim, Y. M. Choi, D. S. Kim, E.-M. Jeong, G. S. Park, I. S. Choi, et al. Comparative Effects of Diet and Statin on NO Bioactivity and Matrix Metalloproteinases in Hypercholesterolemic Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2002; 22(9): e19 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Koh Effects of estrogen on the vascular wall: vasomotor function and inflammation Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2002; 55(4): 714 - 726. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E Rossouw Hormones, genetic factors, and gender differences in cardiovascular disease Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2002; 53(3): 550 - 557. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S Mikkola and T. B Clarkson Estrogen replacement therapy, atherosclerosis, and vascular function Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2002; 53(3): 605 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||