Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1999;99:354-360

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koh, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Cannon, R. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koh, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Cannon, R. O., III
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Fibrinolysis
Right arrow Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide

(Circulation. 1999;99:354-360.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Vascular Effects of Estrogen and Cholesterol-Lowering Therapies in Hypercholesterolemic Postmenopausal Women

Kwang Kon Koh, MD; Carmine Cardillo, MD; Minh N. Bui, MD; Londa Hathaway, RN; Gyorgy Csako, MD; Myron A. Waclawiw, PhD; Julio A. Panza, MD; Richard O. Cannon, III, MD

From the Cardiology Branch (K.K.K., C.C., M.N.B., L.H., J.A.P., R.O.C.) and the Office of Biostatistics Research (M.A.W.), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and the Clinical Pathology Department (G.C.), Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

Correspondence to Dr Richard O. Cannon III, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 7B15, 10 Center Dr MSC-1650, Bethesda, MD 20892-1650. E-mail cannonr{at}gwgate.nhlbi.nih.gov


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Lipoproteins affect endothelium-dependent vasomotor responsiveness. Because lipoprotein effects of estrogen and cholesterol-lowering therapies differ, we studied the vascular responses to these therapies in hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women.

Methods and Results—We randomly assigned 28 women to conjugated equine estrogen (CE) 0.625 mg, simvastatin 10 mg, and their combination daily for 6 weeks. Compared with respective baseline values, simvastatin alone and combined with CE reduced LDL cholesterol to a greater extent than CE alone (both P<0.05). CE alone and combined with simvastatin raised HDL cholesterol and lowered lipoprotein(a) to a greater extent than simvastatin alone (all P<0.05). Flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery (by ultrasonography) improved (all P<0.001 versus baseline values) on CE (4.0±2.6% to 10.2±3.9%), simvastatin (4.3±2.4% to 10.0±3.9%), and CE combined with simvastatin (4.6±2.0% to 9.8±2.6%), but similarly among therapies (P=0.507 by ANOVA). None of the therapies improved the dilator response to nitroglycerin (all P>=0.184). Only therapies including CE lowered levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 and the cell adhesion molecule E-selectin (all P<0.05 versus simvastatin).

Conclusions—Although estrogen and statin therapies have differing effects on lipoprotein levels, specific improvement in endothelium-dependent vasodilator responsiveness is similar. However, only therapies including estrogen improved markers of fibrinolysis and vascular inflammation. Thus, estrogen therapy appears to have unique properties that may benefit the vasculature of hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women, even if they are already on cholesterol-lowering therapy.


Key Words: lipoproteins • endothelium • hormones • cell adhesion molecules • fibrinolysis


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Observational studies suggest that estrogen therapy decreases the risk of coronary artery disease in postmenopausal women.1 The mechanisms of this apparent benefit of hormone therapy most likely include lipoprotein effects: Orally administered estrogen raises plasma levels of HDL cholesterol and lowers plasma levels of LDL cholesterol2 and lipoprotein(a)3 and protects LDL from oxidation.4 These lipoprotein effects may account for improvement in coronary and systemic vasomotor responsiveness due to reduction in inhibitory effects of LDL and lipoprotein(a) in the vessel wall5 6 7 and facilitatory effects of HDL,8 in addition to enhanced nitric oxide bioactivity.9 10 Statin (ß-hydroxy-ß-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A [HMG-CoA] reductase inhibitor) therapy has also been shown to improve vasomotor responsiveness,11 12 13 14 possibly through enhanced nitric oxide bioactivity. However, important differences in the lipoprotein effects of estrogen versus statin therapy may result in differing effects on vasomotor responsiveness. For example, at conventional dosages, statins lower LDL cholesterol to a greater degree than estrogen therapy and have a smaller effect on HDL cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) levels than does estrogen administered to postmenopausal women.15 16

Thus, because the lipoprotein effects that could influence nitric oxide bioactivity differ between estrogen and statin therapies and because estrogen may directly stimulate the release of nitric oxide, as shown in endothelial cells in culture,17 18 19 20 it is possible that the impact of these therapies on nitric oxide bioactivity and its subsequent effects on endothelial homeostasis may differ. Furthermore, because the mechanisms of the biological effects of these therapies differ, the combination of the therapies may be additive, an effect of potential importance to women at high risk for atherosclerosis or with established atherosclerotic disease. Thus, this study was designed to assess the effect of these therapies, independently and in combination, on vascular function in hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Study Population and Design
Thirty-one hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women (LDL cholesterol levels >130 mg/dL) participated in this study, all with plasma 17ß-estradiol levels <50 pg/mL and cessation of menses for at least 1 year. None were diabetic or current cigarette smokers. No subject had taken any cholesterol-lowering agent, estrogen therapy, or antioxidant vitamin supplements during the preceding 2 months. Aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents were stopped for 10 days before study; study participants remained off such drugs throughout the study. Two women withdrew from the study but denied side effects of therapy. A third woman dropped out after the second treatment period because of changes in visual acuity, believed by her ophthalmologist to be unrelated to therapy. Thus, a total of 28 women (age, 57±6 years; LDL cholesterol, 163±36 mg/dL) completed all phases of the study. This study was a randomized, double-blind, double-crossover trial. The study participants received conjugated equine estrogen (CE) 0.625 mg each morning and placebo each night, placebo each morning and simvastatin 10 mg each night, or a combination of the 2 therapies per day for each of three 6-week treatment periods, with 6 weeks between treatment periods. Subjects were placed on a low-nitrate diet for 72 hours before each study to reduce the contribution of dietary nitrates to serum nitrogen oxide levels.21 22 The study was approved by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Review Board, and all participants gave written informed consent.

Laboratory Assays
Blood samples for laboratory assays were obtained between 8:00 and 9:00 AM after overnight fasting (including caffeine) and with the patient recumbent for at least 15 minutes before and at the end of each treatment period and were immediately coded so that investigators performing laboratory assays were blinded to subject identity and study sequence. Plasma estrone and 17ß-estradiol levels were measured by radioimmunoassay. All samples were stored at -70°C until analysis. Total cholesterol and glycerol-blanked triglycerides in the serum were quantified by automated enzymatic techniques. Serum HDL cholesterol was quantified after dextran sulfate precipitation of other lipoproteins. Serum LDL cholesterol levels were directly quantified by an immunoabsorption method. Serum lipoprotein(a) levels were measured by an immunoturbidimetric assay (Incstar) with a lower limit of detectability of 4.9 mg/dL. Serum nitrate/nitrite levels were measured in triplicate by conversion of nitrate (NO3-) to nitrite (NO2-) by nitrate reductase, followed by addition of Griess reagents and photometric measurement of absorbance (Oxford Biomedical Research). Intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1), and E-selectin levels were measured in triplicate by ELISA (R and D systems). Plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) antigen levels were determined in duplicate by a sandwich ELISA (Biopool).

Vascular Studies
Imaging studies of the left brachial artery were performed with a Hewlett-Packard SONOS 2500 ultrasound machine equipped with a 7.5-MHz linear-array transducer after 10 minutes of rest before and at the end of each of the 3 treatment periods.23 Imaging of the artery proximal to the antecubital fossa was done longitudinally, with the center of the artery identified by the clearest visualization of the anterior and posterior intimal layers. The transmit (focus) zone was set to the depth of the near wall.24 Depth and gain settings were set to optimize images of the interface between the lumen and the arterial wall; images were magnified by use of a resolution box function. After a satisfactory transducer position was found, the skin was marked, and the arm remained in that position throughout the study. A baseline measurement of brachial artery diameter was made, as well as a baseline measurement of the velocity of arterial flow by pulsed Doppler with the range gate (1.5 mm) in the center of the artery. The system permitted a direct assessment of the angle between the blood stream and the intersecting ultrasound beam, which was then used to calculate blood flow velocity. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was assessed by measuring the change in the diameter of the brachial artery after 60 seconds of reactive hyperemia relative to baseline measurements after deflation of a cuff on the forearm inflated to 250 mm Hg for 5 minutes, a response previously shown to be mediated primarily by nitric oxide.25 Arterial flow velocity was measured for the first 15 seconds after cuff deflation. After baseline conditions had been reestablished 10 to 15 minutes later, measurements of arterial diameter and flow velocity were repeated, followed by nitroglycerin at a dose of 0.4 mg administered by spray under the tongue to assess endothelium-independent vasodilation. Three minutes later, repeat measurements of arterial diameter and flow velocity were made. All images were coded and recorded on VHS videotape for subsequent blinded analysis. Arterial diameter was measured in millimeters as the distance between the anterior wall media-adventitial interface ("m" line) and the posterior wall intima-lumen interface at end diastole, coincident with the R wave on the ECG at 2 sites along the artery and for 3 cardiac cycles, with these 6 measurements averaged. Blood flow was calculated by multiplying the velocity-time integral of the Doppler flow signal by the heart rate and the cross-sectional area of the vessel. Sixteen studies were independently analyzed on 2 occasions; intraobserver correlation for maximum diameter was 0.97 and for percent dilation 0.78.

Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean±SD. Student's paired t test was used to compare values before and after each treatment and the relative changes in values in response to treatment. The effects of CE, simvastatin, and the two combined were analyzed by 1-way repeated-measures ANOVA. Post hoc comparisons between different treatment pairs were made by the Student-Newman-Keuls multiple-comparison procedures. Pearson correlation coefficient analysis was used to assess associations between values. Friedman repeated-measures ANOVA on ranks was used to compare the effects of CE, simvastatin, and the two combined on lipoprotein(a) levels. The comparison of endothelium-dependent dilation among the 3 treatment schemes was prospectively designated as the primary end point of the study. All other comparisons were considered secondary end points. Therefore, probability values less than the Bonferroni-adjusted {alpha} of 0.05/3=0.017 are deemed as statistically significant for the primary hypothesis. No adjustments were made for the number of secondary hypotheses.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Baseline values before each treatment period were compared: no significant differences were noted (Tables 1Down and 2Down). To assess the possibility of a carryover effect from the initial treatment phase to the next treatment phase, we compared the baseline values before the first treatment phase with those before the second and third treatment phases. No significant differences were found. After 6 weeks of oral CE alone or combined with simvastatin, plasma levels of estrone and 17ß-estradiol increased to a similar degree (Table 1Down). No changes in hormone levels were noted with simvastatin alone.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effects of Oral Conjugated Estrogen, Simvastatin, or Combined Therapy on Hormones and Lipids


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Effects of Oral Conjugated Estrogen, Simvastatin, or Combined Therapy on Endothelial Function

Effects of Treatments on Lipoproteins
All therapies lowered total and LDL cholesterol levels from baseline values (all P<0.001, Table 1Up), with greater effect on LDL cholesterol for simvastatin (-25±14%) and CE combined with simvastatin (-32±14%) than for CE alone (-11±11%; both P<0.05 versus CE alone). The differences in effects of therapies on apolipoprotein B levels were similar. In contrast, only therapies with CE alone or combined with simvastatin increased HDL cholesterol levels (both 17±15% from baseline values; both P<0.05 versus simvastatin alone). All therapies increased apolipoprotein A-I levels from baseline values (all P<0.02) and to a similar degree (P=0.367 by ANOVA). The ratio of LDL to HDL cholesterol levels and the ratio of the apolipoproteins to these lipoproteins decreased to a greater degree on simvastatin combined with CE than with CE or simvastatin alone (Figure 1Down). Only CE alone or combined with simvastatin lowered lipoprotein(a) levels from baseline values (both P<0.05 versus simvastatin alone, Table 1Up). Only simvastatin alone significantly reduced triglyceride levels (-7±43%; P=0.023); therapies including CE did not significantly change these levels from baseline values (both P<0.05 versus simvastatin alone).



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Percent change in ratio of LDL to HDL cholesterol levels (A) and apolipoprotein B to apolipoprotein A-I (B) from respective pretreatment values after CE alone, simvastatin (statin) alone, and combination therapies. (P<0.001 for both data sets by ANOVA.) SEM is identified by bars.

Effects of Treatments on Vasomotor Function
Brachial artery diameter and basal forearm blood flow were similar during each treatment period (P=0.490 and P=0.105 by ANOVA, respectively), as were the peak forearm blood flow and brachial artery diameter during reactive hyperemia (P=0.941 and P=0.248 by ANOVA, respectively; Table 2Up). All therapies increased flow-mediated dilation relative to baseline measurements (Figure 2Down) and to a similar degree (P=0.507 by ANOVA). The brachial artery dilator responses to nitroglycerin were similar for all therapies (P=0.878 by ANOVA) and were not significantly increased compared with respective baseline values (P=0.851 for CE alone, P=0.534 for simvastatin alone, P=0.184 for the two combined). Improvement in flow-mediated dilation did not correlate strongly with changes in lipoprotein levels during any of the treatment periods (all r<=0.366). CE increased serum nitrate/nitrite levels by 5±38%, but the degree of change was not significant compared with pretreatment values (Table 2Up). Simvastatin alone and simvastatin combined with CE lowered serum nitrate/nitrite levels with marginal significance, by 5±37% and 6±30%, respectively (P=0.104 and P=0.109 versus baseline values), albeit without significant differences among therapies (P=0.441 by ANOVA). Improvement in flow-mediated dilation did not correlate with changes in serum nitrate/nitrite levels during any of the treatment periods (all r<0.053).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Percent change in flow-mediated dilatation at respective pretreatment baselines and after CE alone, simvastatin (statin) alone, and combination therapies. SEM is identified by bars.

Effects of Treatment on Markers of Fibrinolysis and Inflammation
Only CE alone or combined with simvastatin lowered plasma PAI-1 levels from baseline values (P<0.01 and P<0.05, respectively; Table 2Up), and these effects were greater than with simvastatin alone (Figure 3Down). CE alone or combined with simvastatin decreased E-selectin levels by 17±14% and 18±16%, respectively (both P<0.001 versus baseline values), and the effect was greater than with simvastatin alone (Figure 4ADown). CE alone or combined with simvastatin decreased VCAM-1 levels by 14±21% and 11±19%, respectively (P=0.003 and P=0.001 versus baseline values), although these effects were not significantly greater than with simvastatin alone (Figure 4BDown). CE combined with simvastatin decreased ICAM-1 levels by 8±15% (P=0.003 versus baseline values), an effect significantly greater than with simvastatin administered alone (Figure 4CDown). Changes in cell adhesion molecule levels on therapies containing CE did not correlate strongly with changes in lipoprotein levels (all r<=0.164), flow-mediated dilation (all r<=0.350), or serum nitrate/nitrite levels (all r<=0.333).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Percent change in PAI-1 from respective pretreatment values after CE alone, simvastatin (statin) alone, and combination therapies. (P<0.05 by ANOVA.) SEM is identified by bars.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Percent change in E-selectin (A), VCAM-1 (B), and ICAM-1 levels (C) from respective pretreatment values after CE alone, simvastatin (statin) alone, and combination therapies. (P<0.001 by ANOVA for E-selectin.) SEM is identified by bars.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In this study, CE 0.625 mg and simvastatin 10 mg, administered alone and in combination, each for 6 weeks, had effects on LDL and HDL cholesterol levels comparable to the report by Davidson et al,15 in which CE 0.625 mg, pravastatin 20 mg, and a combination of these therapies were administered daily to hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women, each for 16 weeks. We found that the combination of estrogen and statin therapies lowered LDL cholesterol to a greater degree than either therapy alone, with elevation of HDL cholesterol similar to that with estrogen alone. Thus, the combination of these therapies decreased the ratio of LDL to HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein levels to a greater degree than either therapy administered alone. Consistent with the findings of Darling et al,16 therapies including CE, but not simvastatin alone, reduced lipoprotein(a) levels.

We reasoned that differing effects of estrogen and statin therapies on lipoproteins that have been shown to affect vascular function might result in differential effects on endothelium-dependent vasodilator responsiveness, with possible additive effects when the therapies are combined. Indeed, CE significantly improved flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery, an effect consistent with enhanced release of nitric oxide.25 Nitrate/nitrite levels, which reflect in part the luminal release of nitric oxide,22 were marginally reduced with simvastatin alone or combined with CE, but not with CE alone. Reduction in luminal release of nitric oxide after statin therapy may indicate reduced synthesis of nitric oxide required for endothelial homeostasis as a consequence of reduced degradation of nitric oxide by oxidized lipoproteins and free radical molecules from the endothelium and from inflammatory cells.26 In contrast, CE did not lower nitrate/nitrite levels in our study participants, despite significant reductions in LDL cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) levels and may reflect competing stimuli to reduce and increase nitric oxide synthesis.

To determine the extent of vascular effects of CE and statin therapies, we measured markers of fibrinolysis and inflammation considered important in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. CE alone or combined with simvastatin reduced PAI-1 levels. In a previous study, we demonstrated that the relative reduction in PAI-1 levels on CE was significantly associated with comparable increases in levels of D-dimer, a product of cross-linked fibrin degradation by plasmin, providing evidence of enhanced fibrinolysis.27 In contrast to the effects of CE, simvastatin did not change PAI-1 levels, consistent with the observation of Zambrana et al28 in 21 hyperlipemic heart transplant patients. However, Isaacsohn et al29 observed a decrease in plasma PAI-1 levels in hypercholesterolemic patients (menopausal status of women not reported) treated with high doses of lovastatin (up to 80 mg/d).

Cell adhesion molecules are expressed after transcriptional activation by a variety of proinflammatory stimuli, including cytokines30 and oxidized LDL.31 32 These molecules are then positioned across the endothelial cell membrane and bind to ligands on inflammatory cells and facilitate their subsequent entry into the vessel wall. 17ß-Estradiol has been shown in endothelial cell cultures to inhibit the expression of cell adhesion molecules in one study33 but to promote their expression in another study.34 Experimental evidence suggests that cell adhesion molecules, once expressed on the endothelial cell surface, may be shed from the surface. Several groups have reported the presence of E-selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 in the culture supernatant within 4 to 6 hours of endothelial or leukocyte cell activation35 36 37 and in sera of humans as shown by the same monoclonal antibody assay as used to demonstrate adhesion molecules in the supernatant of activated endothelial cells in culture.36 37 38 Serum concentrations of E-selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 have been reported to be higher in patients with coronary artery disease38 39 40 and dyslipidemia41 than in healthy control subjects. Although the biological function in sera remains unclear, the clinical relevance of cell adhesion molecules has been suggested by several observational studies. Thus, E-selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 have been demonstrated in human coronary atherosclerotic arteries by immunohistochemistry.42 In the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, higher serum levels of E-selectin and ICAM-1 were found in patients with coronary heart disease and carotid artery atherosclerosis than in healthy control subjects: E-selectin levels correlated positively with the carotid artery thickness measured by ultrasound in this study.40 Belch et al43 reported that patients who underwent peripheral artery balloon angioplasty and developed restenosis at higher serum levels of E-selectin than patients without restenosis. Recently, men in the Physician's Health Study with the highest quartile of ICAM-1 levels were found to be of greater cardiovascular risk than men in the lowest quartile; E-selectin levels were not reported in this study.44 We found that only therapies including CE alone or combined with statin therapy significantly reduced E-selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 levels from respective pretreatment values. These findings are consistent with the recent report of Caulin-Glaser et al,41 who found that men and postmenopausal women not on hormone therapy who had coronary artery disease shown by coronary angiography had higher levels of soluble cell adhesion molecules than men and women without coronary artery disease or postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease who were current users of hormone therapy.

The mechanisms by which CE therapies, but not simvastatin alone, reduced levels of cell adhesion molecules cannot be determined from our study, but they are probably independent of nitric oxide, because nitric oxide bioactivity as manifest by improvement in brachial artery flow-mediated dilation was increased equally by simvastatin and CE therapies from respective pretreatment values. Of interest, a recent study showed that HDL, levels of which were significantly increased in our study with therapies including CE but not simvastatin alone, inhibits cytokine-induced expression of cell adhesion molecules in cultured endothelial cells.45 Furthermore, CE therapies, but not simvastatin alone, reduced levels of lipoprotein(a), recently shown to stimulate the expression of ICAM-1 in cultured endothelial cells.46

We conclude from our study that although estrogen and statin therapies at the dosages used have differing effects on lipoprotein levels, improvement in endothelium-dependent responsiveness is similar. However, only therapies including estrogen improved other vascular homeostatic factors potentially important in atherogenesis. Thus, estrogen therapy may provide vasculoprotective benefit to hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women, even if they are already on statin therapy.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Dr Koh is a visiting scientist from the Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon Medical College, Gil Medical Center, Inchon, South Korea. We appreciate Maureen Leser, RD, for preparing a low-nitrogen diet. We thank Dae Shik Sue, MD (NIDDK, NIH), Rita Mincemoyer, RN, and Rene Costello, MT, for their excellent technical assistance and William Schenke, BA, for his assistance in the preparation of the figures. We greatly appreciate the secretarial assistance of Toni Julia in the typing of the manuscript.

Received June 19, 1998; revision received October 5, 1998; accepted October 9, 1998.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Manson JE, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH. Postmenopausal estrogen therapy and cardiovascular disease: 10-year follow-up from the Nurses' Health Study. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:756–762.[Abstract]
  2. Walsh BW, Schiff I, Rosner B, Greenberg L, Ravnikar V, Sacks FM. Effects of postmenopausal estrogen replacement on the concentrations and metabolism of plasma lipoproteins. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1196–1204.[Abstract]
  3. Sacks FM, McPherson R, Walsh BW. Effect of postmenopausal estrogen replacement on plasma Lp(a) lipoprotein concentrations. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1106–1110.[Abstract]
  4. Sack MN, Rader DJ, Cannon RO III. Oestrogen and inhibition of oxidation of low-density lipoproteins in postmenopausal women. Lancet. 1994;343:269–270.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Mangin EL, Kugiyama K, Nguy JH, Kerns SA, Henry PD. Effects of lysolipids and oxidatively modified low density lipoprotein on endothelium-dependent relaxation of rabbit aorta. Circ Res. 1993;72:161–166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Galle J, Bengen J, Schollmeyer P, Wanner C. Impairment of endothelium-dependent dilation in rabbit arteries by oxidized lipoprotein(a): role of oxygen-derived radicals. Circulation. 1995;92:1582–1589.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Schachinger V, Halle M, Minners J, Berg A, Zeiher AM. Lipoprotein(a) selectively impairs receptor-mediated endothelial vasodilator function of the human coronary circulation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:927–934.[Abstract]
  8. Kuhn FE, Mohler ER, Satler LF, Reagan K, Lu DY, Rackley CE. Effects of high-density lipoprotein on acetylcholine-induced coronary vasoreactivity. Am J Cardiol. 1991;68:1425–1430.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Lieberman EH, Gerhard MD, Uehata A, Walsh BW, Selwyn AP, Ganz P, Yeung AC, Creager MA. Estrogen improves endothelium-dependent, flow-mediated vasodilation in postmenopausal women. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121:936–941.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Guetta V, Quyyumi AA, Prasad A, Panza JA, Waclawiw M, Cannon RO III. The role of nitric oxide in coronary vascular effects of estrogen in postmenopausal women. Circulation. 1997;96:2795–2801.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Leung W-H, Lau C-P, Wong C-K. Beneficial effect of cholesterol-lowering therapy on coronary endothelium-dependent relaxation in hypercholesterolemic patients. Lancet. 1993;341:1496–1500.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Egashira K, Hirooka Y, Kai H, Sugimachi M, Suzuki S, Inou T, Takeshita A. Reduction in serum cholesterol with pravastatin improves endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotion in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 1994;89:2519–2524.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Treasure CB, Klein JL, Weintraub WS, Talley DJ, Stillabower ME, Kosinski AS, Zhang J, Buccuzzi SJ, Cedarholm JC, Alexander RW. Beneficial effects of cholesterol-lowering therapy on the coronary endothelium in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:481–487.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Anderson TJ, Meredith IT, Yeung AC, Frei B, Selwyn AP, Ganz P. The effect of cholesterol-lowering and antioxidant therapy on endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotion. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:488–493.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Davidson MH, Testolin LM, Maki KC, von Duvillard S, Drennan KB. A comparison of estrogen replacement, pravastatin, and combined treatment for the management of hypercholesterolemia in postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1186–1192.[Abstract]
  16. Darling GM, Johns MD, McCloud PI, Davis SR. Estrogen and progestin compared with simvastatin for hypercholesterolemia in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:595–601.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Hishikawa K, Nakaki T, Marumo T, Suzuki H, Kato R, Saruta T. Up-regulation of nitric oxide synthase by estradiol in human aortic endothelial cells. FEBS Lett. 1995;360:291–293.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Hayashi T, Yamada K, Esaki T, Kuzuya M, Satake S, Ishikawa T, Hidaka H, Iguchi A. Estrogen increases endothelial nitric oxide by a receptor-mediated system. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;214:847–855.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Arnal JF, Clamens S, Pechet C, Negre-Salvayre A, Allera C, Girolami JP, Salvayre R, Bayard F. Ethinylestradiol does not enhance the expression of nitric oxide synthase in bovine endothelial cells but increases the release of bioactive nitric oxide by inhibiting superoxide anion production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:4108–4113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Caulin-Glaser T, Garcia-Cardena G, Sarrel P, Sessa WC, Bender JR. 17ß-Estradiol regulation of human endothelial cell basal nitric oxide release independent of cytosolic Ca2+ mobilization. Circ Res. 1997;81:885–892.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. White JW Jr. Relative significance of dietary sources of nitrate and nitrite. J Agric Food Chem. 1975;23:886–891.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Wennmalm A, Benthin G, Edlund A, Jungersten L, Kieler-Jensen N, Lundin S, Westfelt UN, Petersson AS, Waagstein F. Metabolism and excretion of nitric oxide in humans: an experimental and clinical study. Circ Res. 1993;73:1121–1127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Gooch VM, Speigelhalter DJ, Miller OI, Sullivan ID, Lloyd JK, Deanfield JE. Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis. Lancet. 1992;340:1111–1115.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Wendelhag I, Gustavsson T, Suurkula M, Berglund G, Wikstrand U. Ultrasound measurement of wall thickness in the carotid artery: fundamental principles and description of a computerized analyzing system. Clin Physiol. 1991;11:565–577.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Joannides R, Haefeli WE, Linder L, Richard V, Bakkali EH, Thuillez C, Luscher TF. Nitric oxide is responsible for flow-dependent dilatation of human peripheral conduit arteries in vivo. Circulation. 1995;91:1314–1319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Buga GM, Griscavage JM, Rogers NE, Ignarro LJ. Negative feedback regulation of endothelial cell function by nitric oxide. Circ Res. 1993;73:808–812.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Koh KK, Mincemoyer R, Bui MN, Csako G, Pucino F, Guetta V, Waclawiw M, Cannon RO III. Effects of hormone-replacement therapy on fibrinolysis in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:683–690.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Zambrana JL, Velasco F, Castro P, Concha M, Valles F, Montilla P, Jimenez-Pereperez JA, Lopez-Miranda J, Perez-Jimenez F. Comparison of bezafibrate versus lovastatin for lowering plasma insulin, fibrinogen, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 concentrations in hyperlipemic heart transplant patients. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:836–840.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Isaacsohn JL, Setaro JF, Nicholas C, Davey JA, Diotalevi LJ, Christianson DS, Liskov E, Stein EA, Black HR. Effects of lovastatin therapy on plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 antigen levels. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:735–737.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. De Caterina R, Libby P, Peng HB, Thannickal VJ, Rajavashisth TB, Gimbrone MA Jr, Shin WS, Liao JK. Nitric oxide decreases cytokine-induced endothelial activation: nitric oxide selectively reduces endothelial expression of adhesion molecules and proinflammatory cytokines. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:60–68.
  31. Kume N, Cybulsky MI, Gimbrone MA Jr. Lysophosphatidylcholine, a component of atherogenic lipoproteins, induces mononuclear leukocyte adhesion molecules in cultured human and rabbit arterial endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:1138–1144.
  32. Marui N, Offerman MK, Swerlick R, Kunsch C, Rosen CA, Ahmad M, Alexander RW, Medford RM. Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) gene transcription and expression are regulated through an antioxidant-sensitive mechanism in human vascular endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1993;92:1866–1874.
  33. Caulin-Glaser T, Watson CA, Pardi R, Bender JR. Effects of 17ß-estradiol on cytokine-induced endothelial cell adhesion molecule expression. J Clin Invest. 1996;98:36–42.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Cid MC, Kleinman HK, Grant DS, Schopner HW, Fauci AS, Hoffman GS. Estradiol enhances leukocyte binding to tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-stimulated endothelial cells via an increase in TNF-induced adhesion molecules E-selectin, intercellular adhesion molecule type 1, and vascular cell adhesion molecule type 1. J Clin Invest. 1994;93:17–25.
  35. Pigott R, Dillon LP, Hemingway IH, Gearing AJH. Soluble forms of E-selectin, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 are present in the supernatants of cytokine activated cultured endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;187:584–589.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Rothlein R, Mainolfi EA, Czajkowski M. A form of circulating ICAM-1 in human serum. J Immunol. 1991;147:3788–3793.[Abstract]
  37. Newman W, Beall LD, Carson CW, Hunder GG, Graben N, Randhawa ZI, Gopal TV, Wiener-Kronish J, Matthay MA. Soluble E-selectin is found in supernatants of activated endothelial cells and is elevated in the serum of patients with septic shock. J Immunol. 1993;150:644–654.[Abstract]
  38. Haught WH, Mansour M, Rothlein R, Kishimoto TK, Mainolfi EA, Hendricks JB, Hendricks C, Mehta JL. Alterations in circulating intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and L-selectin: further evidence for chronic inflammation in ischemic heart disease. Am Heart J. 1996;132:1–8.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Hwang S-J, Ballantyne CM, Sharrett R, Smith LC, Davis CE, Gotto AM Jr, Boerwinkle E. Circulating adhesion molecules VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and E-selectin in carotid atherosclerosis and incident coronary heart disease cases: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Circulation. 1997;96:4219–4225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Caulin-Glaser T, Farrell WJ, Pfau SE, Zaret B, Bunger K, Setaro JF, Brennan JJ, Bender JR, Cleman MW, Cabin HS, Remetz MS. Modulation of circulating cell adhesion molecules in postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:1555–1560.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Hackman A, Abe Y, Insull W Jr, Pownall H, Smith L, Dunn K, Gotto AM Jr, Ballantyne CM. Levels of soluble cell adhesion molecules in patients with dyslipidemia. Circulation. 1996;93:1334–1338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Davies MJ, Gordon JL, Gearing AJ, Pigott R, Woolf N, Katz D, Kyriakopoulos A. The expression of adhesion molecules ICAM-1, VCAM-1, PECAM, and E-selectin in human atherosclerosis. J Pathol.. 1993;171:223–229.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Belch JJF, Shaw JW, Kirk G, McHaren M, Robb R, Maple C, Morse P. The white blood cell adhesion molecule E-selectin predicts restenosis in patients with intermittent claudication undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Circulation. 1997;95:2027–2031.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Ridker MP, Hennekens CH, Roitman-Johnson B, Stampfer MJ, Allen J. Plasma concentration of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and risks of future myocardial infarction in apparently healthy men. Lancet. 1998;351:88–92.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Cockerill GW, Rye K-A, Gamble JR, Vadas MA, Barter PJ. High density lipoproteins inhibit cytokine-induced expression of endothelial cell adhesion molecules. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:1987–1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Tamaki S, Yamashita S, Kihara S, Ishigami M, Takemura K, Kume N, Kita T, Matsuzawa Y. Lipoprotein(a) enhances the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Circulation. 1998;97:721–728.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
M. E. Wierman and W. M. Kohrt
Review Article: Vascular and Metabolic Effects of Sex Steroids: New Insights Into Clinical Trials
Reproductive Sciences, May 1, 2007; 14(4): 300 - 314.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
M. J Roman, T. Z Naqvi, J. M Gardin, M. Gerhard-Herman, M. Jaff, and E. Mohler
American Society of Echocardiography Report: Clinical application of noninvasive vascular ultrasound in cardiovascular risk stratification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology
Vascular Medicine, August 1, 2006; 11(3): 201 - 211.
[PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
S R Davis, I Dinatale, L Rivera-Woll, and S Davison
Postmenopausal hormone therapy: from monkey glands to transdermal patches
J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2005; 185(2): 207 - 222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. L. Bots, J. Westerink, T. J. Rabelink, and E. J.P. de Koning
Assessment of flow-mediated vasodilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery: effects of technical aspects of the FMD measurement on the FMD response
Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2005; 26(4): 363 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. K. Koh, M. J. Quon, S. H. Han, W.-J. Chung, J. Y. Ahn, Y.-H. Seo, M. H. Kang, T. H. Ahn, I. S. Choi, and E. K. Shin
Additive Beneficial Effects of Losartan Combined With Simvastatin in the Treatment of Hypercholesterolemic, Hypertensive Patients
Circulation, December 14, 2004; 110(24): 3687 - 3692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
T. M. Doherty, L. A. Fitzpatrick, D. Inoue, J.-H. Qiao, M. C. Fishbein, R. C. Detrano, P. K. Shah, and T. B. Rajavashisth
Molecular, Endocrine, and Genetic Mechanisms of Arterial Calcification
Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2004; 25(4): 629 - 672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
K. K. Koh, J. W. Son, J. Y. Ahn, D. S. Kim, D. K. Jin, H. S. Kim, S. H. Han, Y.-H. Seo, W.-J. Chung, W. C. Kang, et al.
Simvastatin Combined With Ramipril Treatment in Hypercholesterolemic Patients
Hypertension, August 1, 2004; 44(2): 180 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
K. K. Koh and I. Sakuma
Should Progestins Be Blamed for the Failure of Hormone Replacement Therapy to Reduce Cardiovascular Events in Randomized Controlled Trials?
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 2004; 24(7): 1171 - 1179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. A. Fitzpatrick
Hormones and the Heart: Controversies and Conundrums
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2003; 88(12): 5609 - 5610.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
E. M. Balk, J. Lau, L. C. Goudas, H. S. Jordan, B. Kupelnick, L. U. Kim, and R. H. Karas
Effects of Statins on Nonlipid Serum Markers Associated with Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review
Ann Intern Med, October 21, 2003; 139(8): 670 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
K. K. Koh, J. Y. Ahn, S. H. Han, D. S. Kim, D. K. Jin, H. S. Kim, M.-S. Shin, T. H. Ahn, I. S. Choi, and E. K. Shin
Pleiotropic effects of angiotensin II receptor blocker in hypertensive patients
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 3, 2003; 42(5): 905 - 910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Davison and S. R. Davis
New Markers for Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Women: Impact of Endogenous Estrogen Status and Exogenous Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2003; 88(6): 2470 - 2478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
E. Kimoto, T. Shoji, K. Shinohara, M. Inaba, Y. Okuno, T. Miki, H. Koyama, M. Emoto, and Y. Nishizawa
Preferential Stiffening of Central Over Peripheral Arteries in Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes, February 1, 2003; 52(2): 448 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
V. Stangl, G. Baumann, and K. Stangl
Coronary atherogenic risk factors in women
Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2002; 23(22): 1738 - 1752.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. J. Evans, H. A. Harris, C. P. Miller, S. K. Karathanasis, and S. J. Adelman
Estrogen Receptors {alpha} and {beta} Have Similar Activities in Multiple Endothelial Cell Pathways
Endocrinology, October 1, 2002; 143(10): 3785 - 3795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
A. Lemay, S. Dodin, N. Kadri, H. Jacques, and J.-C. Forest
Flaxseed Dietary Supplement Versus Hormone Replacement Therapy in Hypercholesterolemic Menopausal Women
Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2002; 100(3): 495 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
K. K. Koh, J. W. Son, J. Y. Ahn, D. K. Jin, H. S. Kim, Y. M. Choi, D. S. Kim, E.-M. Jeong, G. S. Park, I. S. Choi, et al.
Comparative Effects of Diet and Statin on NO Bioactivity and Matrix Metalloproteinases in Hypercholesterolemic Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2002; 22(9): e19 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
K. K. Koh
Effects of estrogen on the vascular wall: vasomotor function and inflammation
Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2002; 55(4): 714 - 726.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
J. E Rossouw
Hormones, genetic factors, and gender differences in cardiovascular disease
Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2002; 53(3): 550 - 557.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
T. S Mikkola and T. B Clarkson
Estrogen replacement therapy, atherosclerosis, and vascular function
Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2002; 53(3): 605 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]