| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 1999;99:3043-3049.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Basic Science Reports |
From the Departments of Medicine (Vascular Medicine) and Biomedical Research, St Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to Jeffrey M. Isner, MD, St Elizabeth's Medical Center, 736 Cambridge St, Boston, MA 02135. E-mail jisner{at}opal.tufts.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsTen days after resection of 1 femoral artery, New Zealand White (NZW) rabbits were randomly assigned to receive recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor (rhVEGF) administered as a single intra-arterial injection (n=6), quinaprilat (n=8) or captopril (n=7) administered as a daily subcutaneous injection, or no treatment (controls, n=6). Angiogenesis was monitored in vivo by measurement of blood pressure, vasoreactivity, and resistance in ischemic versus normal limbs at day 10 (D10) and D40; angiographic studies to identify sites of neovascularization were performed at D10 and D40, and morphometric analysis of capillary density in the ischemic limb was performed at necropsy (D40). Both functional and morphological outcomes documented augmented angiogenesis in quinaprilat-treated rabbits similar to that observed for rhVEGF and superior to that observed with either captopril or no drug (controls). Residual ACE activity was equivalent for the captopril and quinaprilat groups in plasma (42.54±0.03% versus 41.53±0.02%, P=NS) but not in tissue, where quinaprilat lowered ACE activity significantly (P<0.01) compared with captopril (13% versus 61%).
ConclusionsACE inhibition with quinaprilat promotes angiogenesis in a rabbit model of hindlimb ischemia. Thus, nonsulfhydryl ACE inhibitors with high tissue affinity may be potentially useful for therapeutic angiogenesis in ischemic tissues. Moreover, previous evidence that ACE inhibition benefits patients with myocardial ischemia may be due in part to augmented collateral development.
Key Words: angiogenesis angiotensin growth substances ischemia
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ACE inhibition targeting the Ang IImediated inactivation of bradykinin may increase local NO production, and clinical application of drugs intended to inhibit ACE activity has been shown to exert a favorable effect on endothelial dysfunction.6
Previous data regarding the role of the renin-angiotensin system in angiogenesis are controversial. Ang II has been shown to augment microvessel density in rat cremaster muscle7 and promote angiogenesis of precapillary and postcapillary vessels in the chorioallantoic membrane of the chick embryo.8 Although administration of captopril was shown to block neovascularization in the rat cornea9 and microvascular development in hypertensive and normotensive rats,10 other ACE inhibitors have been reported to increase capillary density in rat limb muscle,11 sciatic nerve,12 and coronary microvasculature.13 14 15
The present study was carried out to evaluate the effects of ACE inhibition on neovascularization of ischemic tissue in vivo. We investigated 2 ACE inhibitors, quinaprilat and captopril, both of which may achieve equivalent levels of ACE inhibition in plasma but 1 of which, quinaprilat, inhibits ACE activity more efficiently at the tissue level. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), an EC-specific mitogen shown to promote angiogenesis in the same animal model, was used as a positive control. Both functional and morphological outcomes documented evidence for augmented angiogenesis in quinaprilat-treated rabbits similar to that observed for VEGF and superior to that observed with either captopril or no drug (controls).
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study Design
Animals with limb ischemia were randomly divided into 4
groups. Rabbits in the captopril group (n=7) and the quinaprilat group
(n=8) received a single daily subcutaneous (SC) injection of captopril
(25 mg) or quinaprilat (2 mg), beginning on day 10 (D10) postsurgery
and continuing through D35. The recombinant human (rh)VEGF group, as a
positive control group, consisted of 6 rabbits receiving 500 µg
rhVEGF intra-arterially at D10. The ischemic
control group consisted of 6 rabbits receiving no treatment.
All 4 groups were investigated at D10 and D40 postsurgery, at which time lower-limb blood pressure, vasomotor reactivity, and angiographic score were evaluated. All animals from each group were euthanized on postoperative D40 and studied at necropsy.
An additional group of 15 rabbits underwent ischemic hindlimb surgery and either were not treated (n=3) or were treated from D10 through D35 with captopril (n=7) or quinaprilat (n=5). All 15 of these animals were euthanized at D35, at which time sections of hindlimb muscle were harvested to measure tissue ACE activity.
Measurement of Plasma Levels of ACE Activity
Plasma ACE Activity
Plasma ACE activity in blood samples obtained from the central
ear vein was determined by spectrophotometry using the synthetic
tripeptide FAPGG (Sigma). ACE catalyzes hydrolysis of FAPGG to
furylacryloylphenylalanine and glycylglycine, which results in a
decrease in absorbance at a wavelength of 340 nm. ACE activity in the
sample was determined by comparing the sample reaction rate to that
obtained with an ACE calibrator.
In the 2 groups treated with either quinaprilat or captopril and studied from D10 to D40, ACE activity was measured in plasma at D10 for baseline values, at D14 to assess the efficacy and equivalence of treatments, and at D40 to document the absence of a residual effect after 5 washout days. Efficiency of each regimen was calculated as the percentage of the D10 plasma activity according to the following ratio: D14 plasma activity/D10 plasma activity.
Tissue ACE Activity
To measure tissue ACE activity, muscles from the additional
group were harvested, weighed, and homogenized in PBS. The
solution obtained was used as a substrate for the ACE determination kit
(Sigma), and the result, divided by sample weight, is expressed as
international units per liter per gram of tissue (U ·
L-1 · g-1).
Lower-Limb Blood Pressure Ratio
Blood pressure was measured in both hindlimbs on D10 and D40 as
previously described.16 Blood pressure ratio (BPR) was
defined for each rabbit as systolic pressure of the
ischemic limb/systolic pressure of the normal limb.
Vasomotor Reactivity and Vascular Resistance
After measurement of lower-limb blood pressure, a 3F end-hole
infusion catheter (Tracker-18, Target Therapeutics) was inserted into
the left common carotid artery and advanced to the abdominal aorta. A
0.018-in Doppler guidewire (Cardiometrics) was advanced through the
3F infusion to the proximal segment of the internal iliac artery
supplying the ischemic limb. The Doppler wire records a
real-time, spectral analysis of the Doppler signal, from
which the average peak velocity (the temporal average of the
instantaneous peak velocity wave form) was calculated and displayed on
line.
A second catheter (Tracker-18) was introduced into the left common carotid artery through the same cutdown and advanced to the origin of the common iliac artery of the ischemic limb by use of a separate 0.018-in guidewire (Hi-Torque Floppy II, Advanced Cardiovascular Systems) under fluoroscopic guidance. This catheter was used for infusion of vasoactive drugs, for measurement of intra-arterial blood pressure via connection to a pressure transducer, and for selective angiography of the ischemic limb (see below).
The vasodilators acetylcholine chloride, sodium nitroprusside, and serotonin creatine sulfate were administered intra-arterially over 2 minutes via a constant-infusion pump (1 mL/min). Each was administered at a dose of 1.5 µg · min-1 · kg-1 on D10 and on D40. A lag time of 5 minutes between each drug sufficed for return to basal flow values.
Calculation of Vascular Reactivity
Vascular reactivity was assessed after infusion of vasodilators
into the internal iliac artery of the ischemic limb. Blood flow
was calculated as described previously.17
Angiography was performed immediately after drug administration and intra-arterial blood pressure recording with 1 mL of contrast medium (RenoCal-76, Squibb).
Calculated blood flow ratios (BFRs) are expressed as blood flow after vasodilator injection/basal blood flow, measured just before injection.
Calculation of Vascular Resistance
Vascular resistance was calculated according to the formula
Ri=Pc/QD,
where Ri is vascular resistance at internal iliac
artery, Pc is blood pressure at the common iliac
artery, and QD is Doppler-derived flow at internal iliac
artery. Calculated resistance ratio is expressed as resistance
after vasodilator injection/basal resistance, measured just before
injection.
Angiographic Score
Angiograms of the thigh were performed on postoperative D10 and
D40, and a quantitative angiographic score was derived as previously
described.16
Capillary Density
Microscopic angiogenesis was assessed by measuring the number of
capillaries in light-microscopic sections taken from the
ischemic hindlimb at D40. Tissue sections snap-frozen in liquid
nitrogen were stained for alkaline phosphatase to detect capillary ECs
as previously described.16 18 Capillaries in 21 randomly
selected fields were counted under a x10 objective to determine
capillary density.
Drugs
rhVEGF protein (165-amino-acid isoform of VEGF-A) was the
generous gift of Dr Bruce Keyt (Genentech). Quinaprilat (CI 928;
Acupril ampoules, 1 mg/mL), the active diacid of quinapril, was
generously provided by Parke-Davis, and captopril (Capoten, 12.5-mg
tablets) by Bristol-Meyers Squibb. In a preliminary experiment, we
determined the dose of each drug required to induce the same level of
plasma ACE inhibition. A 50% to 60% inhibition was achieved in
ischemic rabbits with 2 mg of quinaprilat (=2 mL) or 25 mg of
captopril, both after SC administration. For the latter, tablets were
dissolved daily in saline, and the resulting suspension was
injected.
Statistical Analysis
All results are expressed as mean±SEM. Multiple comparison
among 4 groups was performed by ANOVA. When a significant difference
was detected, a protected t test was used for comparisons
between 2 means. A value of P<0.05 was interpreted to
denote statistical significance.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Tissue ACE Activity
Mean tissue activity in thigh muscles of 15 additional rabbits was
significantly different among the 3 groups (P<0.01 by
ANOVA): 12.65±2.60 IU/g in controls, 7.65±1.69 IU/g for the captopril
group (P=0.14 versus controls), and 1.69±0.70 IU/g for
quinaprilat-treated rabbits (P<0.05 versus controls). These
measurements correspond to a residual tissue activity level of 13% for
quinaprilat versus 61% for captopril of that measured in nontreated
(control) tissues (Figure 1
).
Lower-Limb BPR
Quinaprilat, like rhVEGF, resulted in superior recovery of
ischemic/normal BPR compared with either captopril or controls.
At D40, BPR for quinaprilat was 0.86±0.03 compared with 0.45±0.04 for
controls (P<0.01). BPR for VEGF (0.74±0.03) was superior
to that of controls (P<0.01). There was no statistically
significant difference between values recorded for captopril
(0.47±0.05) versus controls (Figure 2
).
No statistically significant difference was found between rhVEGF and
quinaprilat or between captopril and controls.
|
Vasomotor Reactivity and Vascular Resistance
Mean BFR (stimulated flow/basal flow) calculated for the 27
rabbits disclosed moderate dilation induced by acetylcholine or
nitroprusside (1.64±0.01 and 1.69±0.01, respectively).
Serotonin induced dramatic reduction in blood flow,
equivalent among the 4 groups (mean BFR=0.37±0.04), reflecting intense
vasoconstriction.
At D40 (Figure 3
), the response to
acetylcholine was improved in each group, but the magnitude of this
improvement was greatest for quinaprilat and VEGF: control and
captopril groups showed a moderate increase in BFR (1.74±0.09 and
1.93±0.07, respectively), whereas quinaprilat and rhVEGF elicited more
profound vasodilation (3.06±0.25 and 2.72±0.22, respectively).
Comparison with controls disclosed a statistically significant
difference for both quinaprilat and rhVEGF (P<0.01 for
each) but not for captopril (P=0.09). Nitroprusside likewise
resulted in significantly greater vasodilation for quinaprilat
(2.94±0.24, P<0.05) and rhVEGF (2.66±0.35,
P<0.05) but not for captopril (2.05±0.11, P=NS)
compared with controls (1.81±0.09). BFR in response to
serotonin at D40 remained diminished for control and
captopril (0.63±0.09 and 0.62±0.05, respectively) but was
substantially increased with quinaprilat and rhVEGF (1.17±0.08 and
1.19±0.09, P<0.01 versus control for both).
|
Vascular resistance at D10 was comparable among the 4 groups after
acetylcholine, nitroprusside, or serotonin (Table
).
At D40, however, vascular resistance measured in the internal iliac
artery (Figure 4
) varied significantly
among the 4 groups (P<0.01 by ANOVA): resistance remained
significantly greater for controls and captopril versus rhVEGF and
quinaprilat in response to either acetylcholine (0.57±0.04 and
0.51±0.03 versus 0.32±0.03 and 0.35±0.03; P<0.01 versus
control for both quinaprilat and rhVEGF) or nitroprusside (0.42±0.02
and 0.38±0.03 versus 0.28±0.02 and 0.29±0.04; P<0.01 for
quinaprilat and P<0.05 for rhVEGF). Finally, the severe
increase in resistance induced by serotonin at D10 was
reversed only by quinaprilat and rhVEGF (0.94±0.06 and 0.77±0.04,
P<0.05 versus control for both); increased resistance
persisted for both controls and captopril (2.15±0.59 and
1.88±0.20).
|
Angiographic Assessment of Hindlimb Collateral Circulation
The angiographic score (Figure 5
)
measured at D40 was significantly higher for both quinaprilat
(51.19±0.02%, P<0.01) and rhVEGF (50.88±0.04%,
P<0.01) than for control (33.66±0.02%) and captopril
(35.03±0.02%, P=NS).
|
Capillary Density
Morphometric light microscopic analysis of the
medial thigh muscles from the ischemic limbs on D40
demonstrated a prominent increase in capillary density in animals
receiving quinaprilat and rhVEGF (Figure 5
). Capillary density
with quinaprilat (214.0±6.4/mm2,
P<0.01) as well as rhVEGF
(228.8±9.6/mm2, P<0.01) was
significantly greater than in controls
(140.5±4.3/mm2) or with captopril
(147.2±11.9 mm2).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The differing consequences of ACE inhibition noted for quinaprilat versus captopril in this study may be the result of 2 factors. First, these 2 agents do not achieve the same level of tissue ACE inhibition because of differences in tissue affinity. To avoid variation in bioavailability, the dose of each drug was selected to induce an equivalent level of ACE inhibition in plasma. At these doses, however, quinaprilat inhibited ACE activity at the tissue level more efficiently than captopril. The higher tissue inhibition achieved with quinaprilat was previously assessed by both a radioinhibitor-binding assay and autoradiography.19 The evidence in the present study that angiogenesis is more sensitive to tissue than plasma ACE inhibition is consistent with the demonstration that tissue ACE inhibition was more efficient than plasma inhibition for reducing neointima formation after vascular injury.20
Second, captopril but not quinaprilat has a sulfhydryl group that has been implicated in a variety of effects,21 22 including inhibition of neovascularization in the rat cornea. This inhibition could not be shown to result from reduced enzymatic ACE activity but instead appeared to result from captopril inhibition of Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinase activity that ECs require to respond to an angiogenic stimulus.9
The mechanisms responsible for augmented angiogenesis in response to ACE inhibitors remain to be elucidated. There is insufficient evidence to support a direct effect of the renin-angiotensin system on endogenous angiogenic cytokines; in fact, Ang II has previously been reported to induce a concentration- and time-dependent increase in VEGF expression by vascular smooth muscle cells23 as well as ECs.24 We analyzed VEGF gene expression at the protein level in rabbit muscles 5 days after initiation of quinaprilat treatment by Western blot analysis and were unable to show a difference versus controls (data not shown). It is likely that hypoxia in the ischemic limb25 26 is sufficiently potent to upregulate VEGF expression independently of Ang II levels.
In contrast, published data do suggest the possibility of an indirect effect of ACE inhibition, mediated by augmented EC levels of nitric oxide (NO), as a potentially important contributing mechanism. Recent reports have implicated NO as a critical regulatory molecule for angiogenesis. We observed, for example, that angiogenesis is impaired in eNOS-/- mice and that administration of supplemental L-arginine to rabbits with hindlimb ischemia significantly upregulated hindlimb neovascularization.27 Indeed, VEGF directly upregulates EC production of NO,28 and data from other laboratories suggest that NO may be crucial for VEGF-induced angiogenesis.29 30 ACE inhibition has previously been shown to promote NO accumulation in coronary microvessels,31 and certain salutary effects of ACE inhibitors on vasomotor reactivity have been linked to augmented NO release.32 33 34 Moreover, NO may completely abrogate the caspace cascade activated by Ang II and shown by Dimmeler et al35 to induce apoptosis of human umbilical vein ECs.
At least 2 possible mechanisms may account for increased NO in response to ACE inhibition. First, endothelial ACE degrades bradykinin; ACE inhibition blocks this effect, potentiating the accumulation of bradykinin, a potent activator of the L-arginineNO pathway, which has been shown to promote growth of ECs from postcapillary venules via B1 receptors.36 The observations that intracellular augmentation of cGMP with low doses of ramipril or perindopril37 and cardiac capillary length density induced by ACE inhibition are both inhibited by the B2-receptor antagonist icatibant15 constitute inferential evidence that bradykinin may mediate angiogenesis in response to ACE inhibitors.
Second, Ang II can stimulate NADH oxidase present in the vascular wall, increasing the generation of superoxide anions capable of degrading NO.38 Reduced levels of superoxide anions in conjunction with a reduction in Ang II after ACE inhibition would thus be expected to further augment NO bioavailability.
The demonstration that inhibition of tissue ACE activity by quinaprilat promotes angiogenesis has potential clinical implications. In contrast to certain growth factors, including VEGF, currently under clinical investigation for therapeutic angiogenesis, ACE inhibitors, including quinaprilat, are available in an oral formulation that could facilitate treatment of patients with lower-extremity or myocardial ischemia. Alternatively, previous demonstrations of synergy between 2 angiogenic growth factors39 40 41 raises the possibility that a combination of VEGF plus quinaprilat might well yield a synergistic angiogenic response. Finally, the finding that ACE inhibition may promote angiogenesis raises the possibility that the favorable effects of ACE inhibition on the treatment of patients with ischemic heart disease may be due in part to augmentation of coronary collateral circulation.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received October 27, 1998; revision received February 22, 1999; accepted March 19, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. You, C. Cochain, C. Loinard, J. Vilar, B. Mees, M. Duriez, B. I. Levy, and J.-S. Silvestre Combination of the Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Perindopril and the Diuretic Indapamide Activate Postnatal Vasculogenesis in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2008; 325(3): 766 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. You, C. Cochain, C. Loinard, J. Vilar, B. Mees, M. Duriez, B. I. Levy, and J.-S. Silvestre Hypertension Impairs Postnatal Vasculogenesis: Role of Antihypertensive Agents Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1537 - 1544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Li, T. Kondo, Y. Numaguchi, K. Kobayashi, M. Aoki, N. Inoue, K. Okumura, and T. Murohara Role of Bradykinin, Nitric Oxide, and Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor in Imidapril-Induced Angiogenesis Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 252 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Velasquez-Castano and W. R. Taylor Angiotensin II and New Vessel Formation: Aiming for the Right Oxidative Window Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 2008; 28(1): 4 - 5. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ribatti, M. T. Conconi, and G. G. Nussdorfer Nonclassic Endogenous Novel Regulators of Angiogenesis Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2007; 59(2): 185 - 205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Nagai, Y. Oike, K. Izumi-Nagai, T. Koto, S. Satofuka, H. Shinoda, K. Noda, Y. Ozawa, M. Inoue, K. Tsubota, et al. Suppression of Choroidal Neovascularization by Inhibiting Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme: Minimal Role of Bradykinin Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 2321 - 2326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Miller, L. E. Norton, M. P. Murphy, M. C. Dalsing, and J. L. Unthank The role of the renin-angiotensin system and oxidative stress in spontaneously hypertensive rat mesenteric collateral growth impairment Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): H2523 - H2531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Sano, K. Hosokawa, H. Kidoya, and N. Takakura Negative Regulation of VEGF-Induced Vascular Leakage by Blockade of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2006; 26(12): 2673 - 2680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Feihl, L. Liaudet, B. Waeber, and B. I. Levy Hypertension: A Disease of the Microcirculation? Hypertension, December 1, 2006; 48(6): 1012 - 1017. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Donnini, R. Solito, A. Giachetti, H. J. Granger, M. Ziche, and L. Morbidelli Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 Mediates Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Induced Angiogenesis in Coronary Endothelium J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2006; 319(2): 515 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Petersen, D. H. Munzenmaier, and A. S. Greene Angiotensin II infusion restores stimulated angiogenesis in the skeletal muscle of rats on a high-salt diet Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): H114 - H120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Ahimastos, A. Lawler, C. M. Reid, P. A. Blombery, and B. A. Kingwell Brief Communication: Ramipril Markedly Improves Walking Ability in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Randomized Trial Ann Intern Med, May 2, 2006; 144(9): 660 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Waeckel, J. Bignon, J.-M. Liu, D. Markovits, T. G. Ebrahimian, J. Vilar, B. Mees, O. Blanc-Brude, V. Barateau, S. Le ricousse-Roussanne, et al. Tetrapeptide AcSDKP Induces Postischemic Neovascularization Through Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Signaling Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2006; 26(4): 773 - 779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. L. Lazar Role of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in the Coronary Artery Bypass Patient Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 79(3): 1081 - 1089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. G. Ebrahimian, R. Tamarat, M. Clergue, M. Duriez, B. I. Levy, and J.-S. Silvestre Dual Effect of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition on Angiogenesis in Type 1 Diabetic Mice Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 2005; 25(1): 65 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Unthank, K. M. Sheridan, and M. C. Dalsing Collateral Growth in the Peripheral Circulation: A Review Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, July 1, 2004; 38(4): 291 - 313. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H.P. Hilgers, P. M.H. Schiffers, W. M. Aartsen, G. E. Fazzi, J. F.M. Smits, and J. G.R. De Mey Tissue Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme in Imposed and Physiological Flow-Related Arterial Remodeling in Mice Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2004; 24(5): 892 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ichiki Role of Renin Angiotensin System in Angiogenesis: It Is Still Elusive Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2004; 24(4): 622 - 624. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Toko, Y. Zou, T. Minamino, M. Sakamoto, M. Sano, M. Harada, T. Nagai, T. Sugaya, F. Terasaki, Y. Kitaura, et al. Angiotensin II Type 1a Receptor Is Involved in Cell Infiltration, Cytokine Production, and Neovascularization in Infarcted Myocardium Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2004; 24(4): 664 - 670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. I. Levy Can Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptors Have Deleterious Effects in Cardiovascular Disease?: Implications for Therapeutic Blockade of the Renin-Angiotensin System Circulation, January 6, 2004; 109(1): 8 - 13. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. P. Fam, S. Verma, M. Kutryk, and D. J. Stewart Clinician Guide to Angiogenesis Circulation, November 25, 2003; 108(21): 2613 - 2618. [Full Text] |