| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 1999;99:3002-3008.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pa (J.K.S., C.S.H., L.I.S.); Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada (H.L.N.); and Lebanon VA Medical Center, Lebanon, Pa (L.I.S.).
Correspondence to J. Kevin Shoemaker, PhD, Section of Cardiology, MC H047, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 500 University Dr, PO Box 850, Hershey, PA 17033. E-mail kshoemak{at}gcrc.hmc.psghs.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsVascular and metabolic responses to rhythmic forearm exercise were tested in 9 HF patients and 9 control subjects (CTL) during 2 protocols designed to examine the effect of HF on the time course of oxygen delivery versus uptake (protocol 1) and on vasoconstriction during exercise with 50 mm Hg pressure about the forearm to evoke a metaboreflex (protocol 2). In protocol 1, venous lactate and H+ were greater at 4 minutes of exercise in HF versus CTL (P<0.05) despite similar blood flow and oxygen uptake responses. In protocol 2, mean arterial pressure increased similarly in each group during ischemic exercise. In CTL, forearm blood flow and vascular conductance were similar at the end of ischemic and ambient exercise. In HF, forearm blood flow and vascular conductance were reduced during ischemic exercise compared with the ambient trial.
ConclusionsIntrinsic differences in skeletal muscle metabolism, not vasodilatory dynamics, must account for the augmented glycolytic metabolic responses to moderate-intensity exercise in class II and III HF. The inability to increase forearm vascular conductance during ischemic handgrip exercise, despite a normal pressor response, suggests that enhanced vasoconstriction of strenuously exercising skeletal muscle contributes to exertional fatigue in HF.
Key Words: vasodilation vasoconstriction oxygen exercise heart failure
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Additionally, metaboreflex responses in HF are enhanced.13 14 15 However, this reflex fails to normalize metabolism and/or venous oxygen saturation in HF.15 These observations suggest that the metaboreflex may vasoconstrict active muscle HF.15 16
In this report, we examined whether a blood flow limitation during exercise onset limits oxygen uptake and augments glycolysis in HF. We also examined whether metaboreflex activation would reduce blood flow in exercising muscle of HF patients.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Procedures
Data Collection
Heart rate (HR) (ECG), mean arterial pressure (MAP;
model 2300, Finapres), and brachial artery mean blood velocity (MBV;
4-MHz probe, Multigon Industries) were measured continuously and
collected online at 100 Hz. Brachial artery diameter was determined
with 2-dimensional echo Doppler imaging (7.5-MHz probe). The echo
Doppler images were collected continuously on VHS tape for
subsequent analysis. Two separate diameter images, taken during
diastole, were obtained within 5 seconds of each required
time point (see below), and independent measurements were made of each
image by 2 of the authors. Forearm blood flow (FBF) was calculated as
the product of the mean vessel cross-sectional area
(
r2, where r is the vessel radius) and MBV
adjusted for measures made per minute. Vascular conductance (VC) was
calculated as FBF/MAP. The exercising arm was held at heart level for
all tests.
Experimental Protocols
Protocol 1
Experimental Design
In protocol 1, we examined blood flow and oxygen uptake dynamics
during the transition phase between rest and steady-state exercise. The
goals of this protocol were to produce a consistent increase in
FBF, to achieve the same level of oxygen uptake in the CTL and HF
subjects, and to minimize metaboreflex engagement. Dynamic handgrip
exercise (4.4 kg; 1 second/1 second work/rest ratio for 5
minutes)12 was performed by all subjects on the
nondominant forearm.
All CTL and 7 of 9 HF subjects completed 3 trials of this exercise. The remaining 2 HF patients completed 2 trials. Of the 9 HF patients, 2 completed only 4 minutes of exercise before fatigue. One of these patients completed 2 trials; the other completed 3 trials. Subjects rested 20 to 30 minutes between the repeated trials, allowing venous lactate to return to baseline.
Data Acquisition and Analysis
In each trial, HR, MAP, and MBV were collected, whereas
arterial diameter was measured during the second trial
only. During the first trial, 1-mL blood samples were collected from an
antecubital vein (20-gauge Angiocath inserted retrograde) in
heparinized syringes. These samples were drawn at rest, at 10-second
intervals during the first minute of exercise, at 30-second intervals
during the second exercise minute, and then every minute thereafter
until the end of the trial. Blood samples were analyzed for
lactate and pH (model 23L lactate analyzer, Yellow-Springs
Instruments), hemoglobin concentration and saturation
(SO2), and blood gases (model 510
radiometer, ABL). Blood samples were obtained from all CTL subjects and
8 of 9 HF patients.
Three diameter measures were made at rest, with additional measurements made at the time of blood sampling. MBV data were analyzed on a beat-by-beat basis for each trial as described previously.17 The beat-by-beat data from each trial were then time aligned and ensemble averaged over 2-second time bins to combine a contraction and relaxation phase in each data point. The average MBV values over 60 seconds at rest and over 4 seconds at times corresponding to the blood sampling were obtained to calculate FBF.
Arterial oxygen content
(CaO2) was calculated from the venous
[Hb] at rest, assuming an arterial
SO2 of 94% in HF18 19
and 97% in CTL (commonly observed by ear oximetry). Venous oxygen
content (CvO2) was calculated by use
of the measured [Hb] and saturation and the venous
PO2. The arteriovenous oxygen
difference [(A-V)O2diff] was
determined and oxygen extraction was calculated as
(A-V)O2diff/CaO2x100.
A constant arterial oxygen content was assumed because the
intensity of forearm exercise placed a small demand on the
cardiovascular system. Forearm muscle oxygen uptake
(
O2mus) was calculated at each
measured time point as
O2mus=FBFx(A-V)O2diff.
Protocol 2
Experimental Design
All subjects performed protocols 1 and 2. Protocol 2 was
designed to examine the muscle metaboreflex effect on FBF and VC.
Two exercise trials were performed on the dominant forearm after it was sealed at the elbow in an airtight box. Because ischemic exercise is quite fatiguing, the first trial was performed at atmospheric pressure, whereas box pressure was increased to 50 mm Hg during trial 2.20 Limb positive pressure limits exercise FBF21 and evokes a metaboreflex, thereby elevating blood pressure and sympathetic discharge in the exercising arm.22 The rhythmic isometric exercise load was performed at 25% of maximal voluntary contraction force in a 1 second/1 second work/rest schedule for 5 minutes
Data Analysis
HR, MAP, FBF, and VC were measured at rest and during each
minute of exercise. Values were determined over the first 30 seconds of
the baseline period, with a second measurement made 10 seconds before
exercise onset. This was done to assess the effect of positive pressure
on forearm hemodynamics at rest. Because only 1 trial
of each condition was performed, beat-to-beat23 and
contraction-induced23 24 MBV variability was minimized by
averaging data over 5 contraction/relaxation cycles.
Statistical Analysis
A repeated-measures ANOVA (SAS Institute Inc) with a
mixed-effects linear model was used to analyze the data. A
step-down Bonferonni adjustment was made to the probability value for
the contrasts of interest to adjust for multiple comparisons so that
the overall probability of a type I error was 0.05. A two-tailed
t test was used to compare differences in age, maximal
forearm strength, and work rate between the 2 groups. All values are
presented as mean±SE.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Protocol 1
Forearm volumes were 1147±52 and 1152±71 mL for HF and CTL
subjects, respectively. Compared with CTL (35.1±1.8 kg), the smaller
maximal contraction strength of the nondominant arm in the HF group
(29.2±1.8 kg, P<0.04) led to a 2% difference in relative
workload between groups. No between-group differences were observed for
the exercise-induced increase in HR and MAP (Figure 1
) or FBF and VC (Figure 2
). The reduction in
SO2 with exercise tended to be
greater in HF than in CTL (group main effect, P<0.06;
Figure 3
). However, the time courses of
increase in oxygen extraction,
(A-V)O2diff and
O2mus
(P<0.05), were not different between groups (Figure 3
). Despite the similar time courses of FBF and
O2mus, venous lactate
(P<0.003) and hydrogen ion concentration
(P<0.02) after 4 minutes of exercise (the duration that all
subjects completed) were greater in HF (Figure 4
).
|
|
|
|
Protocol 2
For both groups, HR increased more during ischemic
handgrip exercise than during ambient conditions (P<0.05);
however, no between-group differences were observed (Figure 5
). Specifically, the increase in MAP
(ie, the pressor response) during ischemic exercise in HF was
12.2±2.4 and 16.5±3.1 mm Hg in CTL (P=NS).
|
As with protocol 1, FBF during ambient exercise achieved a new
steady-state level by 1 minute of exercise with little difference
between groups (Figure 6
). Compared with
the ambient trial, positive pressure reduced FBF during the first
minute of exercise in both groups (P<0.05) (Figure 6
). Thereafter, FBF increased toward the ambient trial levels in
the CTL subjects, but blood flow remained depressed in the HF group
(P<0.05; Figure 6
).
|
The similar MAP but diminished FBF with 50 mm Hg forearm pressure
resulted in an attenuated total forearm VC in the HF group for the
duration of the ischemic trial (P<0.05; Figure 6
). Total forearm VC did not rise above baseline levels in the
HF group during ischemic exercise, whereas the CTL group
defended both FBF and VC so that the 50 mm Hg and ambient
responses were similar beyond 2 minutes of exercise.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Protocol 1
In both the HF and CTL groups, the increase in muscle oxygen
uptake during the first 30 seconds of exercise was mediated primarily
by an increase in FBF because there was a lag of 20 to 30 seconds for
oxygen extraction to increase. Oxygen extraction and
(A-V)O2diff were not reduced during
the early moments of exercise despite large increases in blood flow and
oxygen uptake, indicating that extraction was keeping pace with oxygen
delivery. Although pulmonary oxygen uptake kinetics during
cycling exercise are slowed in HF,25 26 the current data
suggest that HF per se does not slow the adaptation of FBF and
O2mus during small muscle mass
exercise that minimize contributions from central
hemodynamics.
The current data do not support our initial hypothesis that blood flow and oxygen uptake kinetics during forearm exercise would be slowed in HF. In part, this hypothesis was based on earlier observations of attenuated blood flow and oxygen uptake responses to handgrip contractions in HF.4 10 The explanation for these differences is unclear but may involve differences in disease severity and fluid retention. Unlike patients in the present study, the subjects of earlier reports4 10 had evidence of right-sided decompensation and fluid retention. Forearm edema reduces vascular dilation capacity27 and may alter blood flow distribution and oxygen diffusion. In addition, these earlier studies4 10 used workloads greater than those used in the present study protocol, with consequent increases in metabolic and vasodilatory requirements. Thus, our findings agree with other investigations showing normal steady-state exercise FBF responses in class II and III patients.11 Additionally, our data concur with recent magnetic resonance spectroscopy measures of deoxymyoglobin that suggest that small muscle mass exercise in HF patients is not limited by tissue hypoxia.28 Our data add to these earlier findings by indicating that blood flow and muscle oxygen uptake are not altered during the rest-to-exercise transition in well-compensated HF patients. The greater reliance on glycolytic metabolism in HF is consistent with earlier findings that intramuscular alterations may predispose HF individuals to early fatigue independent of changes in tissue perfusion.2 29 30
The cause of the predilection to elevated lactic acidosis in HF is not
entirely clear. Muscle atrophy in HF may alter the muscle
metabolic adaptation to exercise.31 However,
it is unlikely that the 2.7% difference in maximal handgrip strength
between the HF and CTL groups indicates sufficient muscle atrophy to
account for the
30% greater venous lactate levels in the HF
patients. The comparable blood flow and oxygen uptake responses
strongly suggest that flow distribution within the forearm muscle was
similar in the 2 groups. Therefore, it is unlikely that fiber-type
alterations toward a greater proportion of the more glycolytic type II
fibers8 31 can explain the predisposition toward elevated
lactic acidosis in HF in the present study.
In possible conjunction with altered fiber types, reductions in intramuscular high-energy phosphates and mitochondrial oxidative enzyme concentrations2 31 might combine to augment glycolytic ATP contributions during mild exercise. These changes would be comparable to deconditioned skeletal muscle in healthy individuals. Under conditions of reduced oxidative capacity in which oxygen availability is not limiting, an increased cytosolic reduction (ie, NADH/NAD) would be required to maintain a higher flux through the diminished concentration of electron transport chain enzymes.32 Cytosolic lactate accumulation would result.
Protocol 2
For the CTL group, the similar FBF responses between ambient and
positive pressure trials suggest that in healthy older subjects,
factors associated with a metaboreflex-induced exercise pressor
response act to maintain flow to active skeletal muscle. Whether the
inability to observe an increased VC during ischemic exercise
in the HF group indicates reduced vasodilation or augmented
metaboreflex-induced sympathetic vasoconstriction13 14
cannot be determined from the current data. However, the normal dilator
response in HF subjects during protocol 1 would suggest that an
enhanced vasoconstrictor response contributed importantly to the
reduced blood flow response in protocol 2.
In the present study, blood flow was normal during ischemic exercise in CTL subjects. However, the same protocol did not result in improved venous markers of muscle metabolism in our previous study.15 The explanation for this may be the slowed adaptation of blood flow during positive pressure in the present study.12
Methodological Considerations
In our hands, the between-day reproducibility for Doppler
ultrasound measures is 2% to 4% for diameter and 10% to 12% for
velocity.23 Interobserver variation for measurements of
vessel diameter, as performed in the present study, was <5%.
These data provide confidence in the estimate of both volumetric blood
flow and its time course. Beat-to-beat variability in blood velocity
measures was minimized by convergent averaging of data from 2 or 3
repeated trials (protocol 1) or by averaging velocity data over 5
contraction/relaxation cycles (protocol 2).23 24
Maintaining patient pharmacological therapy may have normalized an otherwise compromised vascular response to rhythmic exercise during protocol 1. We chose this approach over withdrawing treatment before the test because it is unclear what effect drug withdrawal has on vascular responses and how long these effects may persist. Regardless, the attenuated increase in VC during ischemic exercise indicates that despite pharmacological interventions, the HF group does not defend muscle blood flow as well as CTL subjects during metaboreflex engagement.
Finally, we observed previously that HF patients generate a
significantly greater pressor response to ischemic exercise
compared with normal CTL subjects.15 This is in contrast
to the present study, in which pressor responses were comparable.
As addressed above, cardiovascular responses to
fatiguing exercise may depend on the severity of HF. Although the
patients studied previously were largely class III, the degree of HF
was more severe, as indicated by ejection fractions that were on
average
15% less than those observed in the present patients.
Additionally, metaboreflex studies were performed on the dominant
forearm in the present report. Dominant forearm exercise evokes
less acidosis and metaboreflex engagement.33
It is unlikely that the test sequence influenced results because protocols 1 and 2 were performed on different arms.
Conclusions
In the present study, greater glycolytic
metabolism was evident in the HF patients during rhythmic
handgrip exercise when the time courses of FBF, oxygen extraction, and
oxygen uptake were not different from CTL subjects. Therefore, altered
muscle metabolism appears to be independent of blood flow
and oxygen delivery in HF. Whether this mechanism plays a role in
limitations to whole-body exercise cannot be extrapolated from these
data. Under more strenuous exercise conditions imposed by muscle
ischemia, the same HF patients displayed an attenuated increase
in both FBF and VC. The inability of these HF patients to increase
forearm VC during ischemic exercise, despite a normal pressor
response, suggests that enhanced vasoconstriction occurred in the
strenuously contracting skeletal muscle. We speculate that limited
cardiac output during whole-body exercise in HF results in relative
muscle ischemia that, when coupled with muscle abnormalities,
produces greater metaboreflex engagement, heightened
sympathoexcitation, and greater muscle vasoconstriction, which
contribute to early exertional fatigue.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received November 12, 1998; revision received March 15, 1999; accepted March 26, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
O2 on
blood flow dynamics at onset of forearm exercise. J Appl
Physiol. 1996;81:16191626.
O2, glycolysis, energetics,
and intracellular PO2. J
Appl Physiol. 1990;68:833842.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Crisafulli, R. Milia, A. Lobina, M. Caddeo, F. Tocco, A. Concu, and F. Melis Haemodynamic effect of metaboreflex activation in men after running above and below the velocity of the anaerobic threshold Exp Physiol, April 1, 2008; 93(4): 447 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Xing, S. Koba, V. Kehoe, Z. Gao, K. Rice, N. King, L. Sinoway, and J. Li Interstitial norepinephrine concentrations in skeletal muscle of ischemic heart failure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): H1190 - H1195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Crisafulli, E. Salis, F. Tocco, F. Melis, R. Milia, G. Pittau, M. A. Caria, R. Solinas, L. Meloni, P. Pagliaro, et al. Impaired central hemodynamic response and exaggerated vasoconstriction during muscle metaboreflex activation in heart failure patients Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): H2988 - H2996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Koba, Z. Gao, J. Xing, L. I. Sinoway, and J. Li Sympathetic responses to exercise in myocardial infarction rats: a role of central command Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): H2735 - H2742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. F. Ferreira, A. J. Harper, and T. J. Barstow Frequency-domain characteristics and filtering of blood flow following the onset of exercise: implications for kinetics analysis J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2006; 100(3): 817 - 825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. I. Sinoway and J. Li A perspective on the muscle reflex: implications for congestive heart failure J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2005; 99(1): 5 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Momen, D. Bower, J. Boehmer, A. R. Kunselman, U. A. Leuenberger, and L. I. Sinoway Renal blood flow in heart failure patients during exercise Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): H2834 - H2839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Li, A. N. Sinoway, Z. Gao, M. D. Maile, M. Pu, and L. I. Sinoway Muscle Mechanoreflex and Metaboreflex Responses After Myocardial Infarction in Rats Circulation, November 9, 2004; 110(19): 3049 - 3054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Richardson, C. A. Kindig, T. I. Musch, and D. C. Poole Effects of chronic heart failure on skeletal muscle capillary hemodynamics at rest and during contractions J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2003; 95(3): 1055 - 1062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. F. Notarius, D. J. Atchison, and J. S. Floras Impact of heart failure and exercise capacity on sympathetic response to handgrip exercise Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2001; 280(3): H969 - H976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Lee, J. K. Shoemaker, P. M. McQuillan, A. R. Kunselman, M. B. Smith, Q. X. Yang, H. Smith, K. Gray, and L. I. Sinoway Effects of forearm bier block with bretylium on the hemodynamic and metabolic responses to handgrip Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2000; 279(2): H586 - H593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Thomas, W. Zhang, and R. G. Victor Impaired Modulation of Sympathetic Vasoconstriction in Contracting Skeletal Muscle of Rats With Chronic Myocardial Infarctions : Role of Oxidative Stress Circ. Res., April 27, 2001; 88(8): 816 - 823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |