(Circulation. 1999;99:2742-2749.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Ill (R.C.H., M.W.G.); Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif (D.S.B.); Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (S.J.C.); University of Pittsburgh (Pa) (W.F.); Hartford (Conn) Hospital (G.V.H.); Sydney Cardiology Group, Westmead, Australia (H.K.); and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (J.J.M.).
Correspondence to Robert C. Hendel, MD, 250 E Superior St, Suite 456, Chicago, IL 60611. E-mail r-hendel{at}nwu.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsA prospective multicenter trial was
performed recruiting patients with angiographically documented
coronary disease (n=96) and group of subjects with a low
likelihood of disease (n=88). The uncorrected and attenuation/scatter
corrected images were read independently, without knowledge of the
patient's clinical data. The detection of
50% stenosis was
similar using uncorrected perfusion data or with attenuation/scatter
correction and resolution compensation (visual or visual plus
quantitative analysis), 76% versus 75% versus 78%,
respectively (P=NS). The normalcy rate, however, was
significantly improved with this new methodology, using either the
corrected images (86% vs 96%; P=0.011) or with the
corrected data and quantitative analysis (86% vs 97%;
P=0.007). The receiver operator characteristic curves
were also found to be marginally but not significantly higher with
attenuation/scatter correction than with tradition SPECT imaging.
However, the ability to detect multivessel disease was reduced with
attenuation/scatter correction. Regional differences were also noted,
with reduced sensitivity but improved specificity for right
coronary lesions using attenuation/scatter correction
methodology.
ConclusionsThis multicenter trial demonstrates the initial clinical results of a new SPECT perfusion imaging modality incorporating attenuation and scatter correction in conjunction with 99mTc sestamibi perfusion imaging. Significant improvements in the normalcy rate were noted without a decline in overall sensitivity but with a reduction in detection of extensive coronary disease.
Key Words: imaging perfusion nuclear medicine diagnosis radioisotopes
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recent advances in camera instrumentation and software development offer the potential for correction of nonuniform photon attenuation.5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 One such method for attenuation correction involves the acquisition of transmission data and construction of an attenuation map to correct for nonuniform photon attenuation.14 The purpose of this trial was to determine the efficacy of attenuation correction, scatter correction, and resolution compensation, hereafter referred to as corrected imaging, in patients with known or suspected coronary disease by use of 99mTc sestamibi perfusion imaging. Additionally, because the primary benefit of artifact reduction was believed to be decreased false-positive SPECT studies, a cohort of patients with a low likelihood for coronary disease was recruited to determine the comparative normalcy rates.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Treadmill exercise testing was performed with a Bruce protocol, which
was continued for
1 additional minute after injection of the
99mTc sestamibi (
25 mCi). Alternatively,
pharmacological stress testing was performed with the use of standard
protocols with dipyridamole or adenosine
infusions. The resting study was obtained either on a separate day with
25 mCi 99mTc sestamibi or on the same day
preceding the stress study with 201Tl (2 to 5
mCi) or 99mTc sestamibi (8 to 12 mCi).
Image Acquisition and Processing
Images were acquired with the use of a noncircular clockwise
orbit with a dual detector camera (Vertex, ADAC Laboratories). A total
of 64 projections were obtained (25 seconds per projection).
The data were collected in 3 individual photopeaks: (1) emission, 140
keV ±10%; (2) transmission, 100 keV ±10%; and (3) scatter, 118 keV
±6%.
A centralized core laboratory received unprocessed data, and quality control was performed on images by examination of the rotating projection and summed projection images for patient motion and other technical problems. Images were reconstructed in 3 orthogonal views with multiple slices displayed on a video monitor.
The uncorrected emission data were reconstructed by a filtered backprojection method with a Butterworth filter (cutoff 0.66 Nyquist, order 5). Reconstruction of the attenuation (mu) map was performed by filtered backprojection of the transmission data after normalization to the reference scan and logarithmic inversion. The data were then filtered with a Butterworth filter (cutoff 0.5 Nyquist, order 5). The attenuation-corrected images were created starting with the filtered backprojection initial estimate followed by a maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) algorithm with 12 iterations. The iterative reconstruction filtration was set to match the resolution of the corrected data with that of the uncorrected data. Scatter correction used a single energy convolution subtraction technique and was performed on the transmission data (downscatter correction) and on the 99mTc sestamibi data (photopeak correction).9 18 Depth-dependent, nonstationary resolution compensation was achieved with a modified Wiener filter.19 The software for attenuation and scatter correction algorithms with resolution recovery is fully automated (Vantage, ADAC Laboratories; ExSPECT, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga).
Quantification was performed with a sex-specific database composed of either 21 men or women at low likelihood for ischemic heart disease; the cutoff for abnormalcy of 2.5 SD, a value determined by receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis. More than 5% of the total number of pixels with a value >2.5 SD from the mean counts per pixel constituted an abnormal study when based exclusively on quantitative analysis.
Interpretation
The images were reviewed on a video monitor by 2 experienced
observers without clinical data; a third reviewer was used when no
consensus was reached. The perfusion images were scored
semiquantitatively (0 to 4 scale) with the 20-segment model, with the
summed stress score determined by adding each of the 20-segment scores
on the stress images.20 A final diagnosis for each scan
was based on 5 categories and scored with the use of a 1 to 5 numerical
scale: definitely normal (1), probably normal (2), equivocal (3),
probably abnormal (4), and definitely abnormal (5). When the data were
dichotomized to the presence or absence of coronary artery
disease, an evaluation of either definitely normal or probably normal
was used to reflect the scintigraphic absence of disease. The paired,
noncorrected stress/rest images were read in a blinded manner. During a
second interpretation session several weeks later, the corrected images
were visually interpreted. After visual assessment of the images, the
interpreters were presented with the quantitative data (polar
plots). These quantitative results were assessed with the visual data
to obtain a combined interpretation. The quantitative results were also
used exclusively for the determination of the quantitative
normalcy rate.
Diagnostic End Points
The coronary angiograms were reviewed by an
interventional cardiologist/cardiac radiologist at each site who was
blinded to the clinical and scintigraphic data. Luminal diameter
stenoses
50% were considered significant for the presence of
coronary disease. Individual vessel correlation was also
determined comparing the angiographic results with those of perfusion
imaging by use of the segmental scores, in accordance with a previously
defined schema.20 If patients had a normal overall score,
they were treated as if there were no segmental abnormalities
present.
Statistics
Continuous data are expressed as mean±SD. Paired t
tests were used to compare differences in continuous data and
McNemar's tests were used to compare differences in paired discrete
data. All statistical tests were 2-tailed, and a value of
P<0.05 was considered significant. The sensitivity was
determined for whether any disease (
1-vessel disease) was present
or when multivessel disease (
2 vessels) was noted. The normalcy
rate21 was determined from low-likelihood subjects
who had a <5% likelihood of having coronary artery disease
based on age, sex, risk factors, symptoms, and ECG response to
exercise.17 The normalcy rate was defined as the ratio of
the number of subjects with definitely normal or probably normal scans
divided by the total number of subjects in the cohort (x100%). Data
from patients in the coronary artery disease cohort were used
to calculate sensitivity and specificity. ROC analyses were
based on overall diagnostic scan scores from all patients
in the study, both low-likelihood and coronary artery disease
cohorts.22 23 The areas under each pair of ROC curves and
the significance of the difference between the areas was
calculated with the use of CORROC2.24 Patients with
single-vessel disease were excluded from sensitivity, specificity, and
ROC analyses for comparisons in patients with multivessel
disease.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
50%. This latter group constituted the
angiographically confirmed coronary disease cohort and was used
for calculating the diagnostic sensitivity. Single-,
double-, and triple-vessel coronary disease were noted in 26,
38, and 32 patients, respectively. A significant (
50%)
stenosis was present in the left anterior descending
(n=72), left circumflex (n=66), and right (n=60) coronary
arteries. Of the 111 low-likelihood subjects, 23 with pharmacological
stress testing were excluded from the normalcy rate determination. The
demographic data for the 2 study groups are depicted in the
Table
|
Patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease had either treadmill exercise (58%) or pharmacological stress testing (45%; dipyridamole=18, adenosine=21, dobutamine=1). The coronary disease cohort developed ECG changes or chest pain in 32 and 26 patients, respectively. Imaging was performed with the dual isotope method25 in most cases.
Using the a priori definition of an abnormal SPECT study to
include images considered equivocal, probably abnormal, or definitely
abnormal, the sensitivity for the detection of coronary disease
was 76% by visual interpretation of uncorrected images (Figure 1
). The subsequent interpretation of the
corrected images yielded a similar sensitivity (75%; P=NS).
Examples of the effects of attenuation/scatter correction and
resolution recovery are shown in Figures 2
and 3
.
When quantitative data were used along with the visual assessment of
the corrected data, the combined interpretation demonstrated a
sensitivity of 78% (P=NS). Therefore there were no
significant differences in diagnostic sensitivity
attributable to the use of correction techniques. The
diagnostic scores (1 through 5) were also similar for the
visually assessed uncorrected (3.9±1.5) and corrected (3.9±1.6)
images and for the combined visual and quantitative analyses
(3.9±1.5; all values P=NS). An analysis of patients
without prior infarction (n=69) demonstrated no difference in
sensitivity between the corrected and uncorrected images (both 72%).
The summed stress score for the uncorrected images was higher that
after correction (12.7±11.0 vs 9.6±9.4, P<0.001). The
sensitivity and specificity for triple-vessel coronary disease
were similar for corrected (81% and 63%, respectively) and
uncorrected imaging (78% and 63%, respectively). However, the
identification of multivessel disease in patients with more than 1
stenotic coronary artery decreased from 70% to 47%
when correction methods were applied (P<0.01).
|
|
|
Only 16 patients were available for determination of specificity. This cohort demonstrated low specificity with or without correction techniques (44% vs 50%; P=NS). However, images with complete homogeneity of activity were noted in 7 patients with correction applied, in contrast to none in the usual SPECT images (P=0.008).
The diagnostic value of attenuation/scatter correction for
the visual interpretation of individual coronary arteries was
also determined (Figure 4
). Sensitivity
and specificity were similar in the left anterior descending and left
circumflex coronary artery territories. However, for the right
coronary artery, significantly improved specificity was noted
for the corrected images, but at the expense of a reduced sensitivity.
|
All low-likelihood patients had exercise testing performed, with 94%
of these subjects achieving at least 85% of their age-adjusted maximum
heart rate. No subject developed exercise-induced ECG changes, but 5
(6%) did experience noncardiac chest pain; the age and sex of the
subjects still permitted classification as a low-likelihood
subject.17 The normalcy rates for uncorrected,
corrected-visual, and corrected-combined are depicted in Figure 5
. Within the low-likelihood cohort,
significantly more studies were interpreted as normal or probably
normal with either visual only corrected (96% P=0.0114) or
combined visual/quantitative corrected interpretation (97%;
P=0.0067) than with uncorrected imaging (86%). However, if
the equivocal category was included in the normal group, no statistical
improvement in normalcy was noted with attenuation correction.
Automated quantitative analysis of the corrected images yielded
a normalcy rate of 92% (P=NS compared with the visual only
or combined readings). The overall diagnostic score was
significantly lower ("more normal") when attenuation correction was
used for the evaluation of these low-likelihood subjects: 1.3±0.6 for
corrected-visual and 1.3±0.6 for corrected-combined versus 1.7±0.9
for uncorrected (P<0.001). The summed stress score was
lower for the corrected data than with standard SPECT imaging (0.6±1.4
vs 1.6±2.0, P<0.001).
|
To assess overall diagnostic performance, ROC
curves were generated, with the addition of low-likelihood patients to
the coronary artery disease cohort as a measure of
"specificity." The curves for the detection of coronary
artery disease (
50% stenosis) are displayed in Figure 6A
. For the analysis of
multivessel disease, the ROC determinations were performed in 2 ways.
First, patients with 2 or more diseased vessels were compared with
patients without documented coronary artery disease and
demonstrated slight improvement of the ROC areas with correction (0.91
vs 0.85; P=0.04) (Figure 6B
). In the second
analysis, the ROC areas were compared in patients with 2 or
more diseased vessels with those with either single-vessel disease or
no disease and demonstrated only a minor trend for improvement of ROC
area with corrected imaging (0.85 vs 0.82; P=0.09).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Photon attenuation from overlying soft tissue constitutes a major problem for SPECT perfusion imaging. Although the true prevalence of soft tissue artifacts is unknown, estimates have ranged from 20 to 50%.26 27 A number of techniques have been shown to be useful in recognizing these artifacts, such as a review of the projection data,2 gated SPECT imaging,1 3 28 prone imaging,29 incorporation of clinical patient data,30 and quantitation.21 However, techniques incorporating attenuation and scatter correction have held the promise of depicting true coronary perfusion and theoretically improving the diagnostic value of modern perfusion imaging beyond any currently available method.
Attenuation Correction
Although methods for the uniform correction of attenuation were
initially promising,4 the thorax possesses significant
nonhomogeneity of soft tissue attenuation and negate the value of these
algorithms.6 15 To perform nonuniform attenuation
correction, the generation of a patient specific attenuation map is of
critical importance.11 Integrated SPECT systems
incorporating the use of an external transmission source in a variety
of configurations have been used with variable
success.5 6 12 16 The development of nonuniform
attenuation correction methods has been facilitated by improved
computer systems and provide the ability to successively approximate
true tracer distribution by iterative reconstruction
techniques.13 15
Current Trial
The system examined in this trial used a camera with 2 detectors
separated by 90 degrees and a shuttered Gd-153 line source positioned
180 degrees across from each detector. The Gd-153 rod moves across the
field of view during the acquisition of the emission data, providing
the transmission data required for the construction of the attenuation
map by use of a scanning, electronic photopeak window.7
This eliminates the need for additional imaging time and reduces the
potential for misregistration of the emission and transmission data
sets.11 31 As the entire field of view is utilized,
truncation, a potential source of error, is reduced. Promising clinical
results using a similar method for attenuation correction as in the
current trial, but without scatter correction or resolution
compensation, were reported for a small group of patients undergoing
99mTc tetrofosmin imaging.32
A unique aspect of this multicenter trial was the application of scatter correction and depth-dependent resolution compensation into the attenuation correction algorithm. As photons interact with tissue and have some reduction of energy, they may still be included in the counting as the result of the width of the energy window, potentially interfering with the accurate generation of the attenuation map. In fact, attenuation correction without scatter correction may even promote artifact production.5 33
Comparison With Other Attenuation-Correction Methodologies
Although attenuation correction has been under development for
more than 3 decades, a clinically applicable system has only recently
been developed. Some systems have been shown in preliminary reports to
be highly prone to artifacts34 or are simply ineffective.
One of the most encouraging methods was used by Ficaro and
colleagues,5 6 who reported the results of attenuation
correction in phantoms and patient cohorts with a custom designed
system. Using a unique 3-detector system and a transmission source of
241Am, these investigators showed a significant
improvement in the diagnostic accuracy of
99mTc sestamibi SPECT imaging.5
Although no significant increase was noted in sensitivity, as found in
the current study, marked improvement in specificity was noted.
Similarly, in a group of 59 low likelihood patients, an increase in the
normal rate from 88% to 98% was shown using visual assessment;
improvement of a similar magnitude was found in the current multicenter
trial.
Cost-Effectiveness
The value of these correction techniques is due to improved
normalcy determination, as traditional SPECT imaging is limited by the
frequent appearance of nonhomogenous tracer
distribution.1 2 The improved identification of
imaging artifacts will decrease the number of false-positive
interpretations and could lead to fewer inappropriate coronary
angiograms. However, the underestimation of disease extent and the
resultant failure to detect a high-risk patient may actually increase
costs. The modern era mandates that any technological advance requiring
additional expenditures be placed in a cost-effectiveness construct;
thus further examination of the economic impact of this new technology
appears prudent.
Limitations
Technical problems with the initial software were present
early in this study, accounting for a number of acquisition errors.
These were predominately caused by the difficulty in obtaining
transmission and emission data during a gated SPECT acquisition. These
problems were resolved, and no patients were excluded because of
software problems in the second half of the trial.
Our pilot studies demonstrated that "blinding" to whether or not attenuation correction was performed was virtually impossible because of the image characteristics associated with attenuation correction (ie, enhanced appearance of the right ventricle). Therefore, a potential but unavoidable and unintentional bias may be present in the interpretation of the images. An optimal design of a future study might include a larger number of patients, with both the uncorrected and corrected images being blindly interpreted during a single reading session.
The current trial used sex-specific populations for the derivation of the separate male and female normal databases. The reason for differences, even after attenuation and scatter correction, is not apparent and is different from the use of a single map as reported by Ficaro et al.5 6 The probable explanation is that residual attenuation and scatter may be present, accounting for sex differences.
This trial compared the traditional method of SPECT image reconstruction (filtered backprojection) directly to attenuation/scatter correction with resolution recovery with MLEM reconstruction. Thus no comparison of MLEM reconstruction with or without correction methods was performed as part of this trial. However, previously noted changes in image appearance from the use of MLEM did not affect diagnostic accuracy, as preliminary work revealed that changes in the normalcy value of imaging with attenuation correction were not attributable to the MLEM method.35
Regional differences appear to be present with the current attenuation correction algorithm. The reduction in sensitivity in the inferior wall may be due to the obscuring of this region in patients with prominent hepatic activity. Attenuation correction may exacerbate this problem in such patients.5 32 An additional concern is the apparent decrease in delineation of disease extent, as manifest by the reduction in the summed stress score and the lowered sensitivity for multivessel disease with attenuation/scatter correction. This may have important prognostic ramifications.
Gated SPECT also offers the opportunity for improved recognition of soft-tissue attenuation artifacts.3 28 Although gated SPECT is now feasible simultaneously with correction, only a subgroup of patients in this study were acquired with gated SPECT, and the trial design did not allow the determination of the added value of correction over gated SPECT or which technique may be more valuable.
Conclusions
The current multicenter trial demonstrates the potential value of
a new SPECT perfusion imaging modality incorporating attenuation and
scatter correction in conjunction with 99mTc
sestamibi perfusion imaging. Significant improvements in the normalcy
rate were noted without a decline in overall sensitivity. However,
there is underestimation of disease extent.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received August 18, 1998; revision received February 25, 1999; accepted March 23, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Wolak, P. J. Slomka, M. B. Fish, S. Lorenzo, D. S. Berman, and G. Germano Quantitative Diagnostic Performance of Myocardial Perfusion SPECT with Attenuation Correction in Women J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 915 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Schwitter, C. M. Wacker, A. C. van Rossum, M. Lombardi, N. Al-Saadi, H. Ahlstrom, T. Dill, H. B.W. Larsson, S. D. Flamm, M. Marquardt, et al. MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2008; 29(4): 480 - 489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S.H. Cheng, T. J. Pegg, T. D. Karamitsos, N. Searle, M. Jerosch-Herold, R. P. Choudhury, A. P. Banning, S. Neubauer, M. D. Robson, and J. B. Selvanayagam Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging at 3-Tesla for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease: A Comparison With 1.5-Tesla J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 26, 2007; 49(25): 2440 - 2449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Xiao, T. C. de Wit, W. Zbijewski, S. G. Staelens, and F. J. Beekman Evaluation of 3D Monte Carlo-Based Scatter Correction for 201Tl Cardiac Perfusion SPECT J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 637 - 644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Xiao, T. C. de Wit, S. G. Staelens, and F. J. Beekman Evaluation of 3D Monte Carlo-Based Scatter Correction for 99mTc Cardiac Perfusion SPECT J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2006; 47(10): 1662 - 1669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yoshinaga, B. J.W. Chow, K. Williams, L. Chen, R. A. deKemp, L. Garrard, A. Lok-Tin Szeto, M. Aung, R. A. Davies, T. D. Ruddy, et al. What is the Prognostic Value of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 5, 2006; 48(5): 1029 - 1039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Sakuma, N. Suzawa, Y. Ichikawa, K. Makino, T. Hirano, K. Kitagawa, and K. Takeda Diagnostic Accuracy of Stress First-Pass Contrast-Enhanced Myocardial Perfusion MRI Compared with Stress Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2005; 185(1): 95 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Fricke, H. Fricke, R. Weise, A. Kammeier, R. Hagedorn, N. Lotz, O. Lindner, D. Tschoepe, and W. Burchert Attenuation Correction of Myocardial SPECT Perfusion Images with Low-Dose CT: Evaluation of the Method by Comparison with Perfusion PET J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2005; 46(5): 736 - 744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Elkington, P. D. Gatehouse, T. M. Cannell, J. C. Moon, S. K. Prasad, D. N. Firmin, and D. J. Pennell Comparison of Hybrid Echo-planar Imaging and FLASH Myocardial Perfusion Cardiovascular MR Imaging Radiology, April 1, 2005; 235(1): 237 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Fricke, E. Fricke, R. Weise, A. Kammeier, O. Lindner, and W. Burchert A Method to Remove Artifacts in Attenuation-Corrected Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Introduced by Misalignment Between Emission Scan and CT-Derived Attenuation Maps J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2004; 45(10): 1619 - 1625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.H. Giang, D. Nanz, R. Coulden, M. Friedrich, M. Graves, N. Al-Saadi, T.F. Luscher, G.K. von Schulthess, and J. Schwitter Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: first european multi-centre experience Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2004; 25(18): 1657 - 1665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. S. Lee, D. Resnick, S. S. Tiu, J. J. Sanger, C. A. Nazzaro, G. M. Israel, and O. P. Simonetti MR Imaging Evaluation of Myocardial Viability in the Setting of Equivocal SPECT Results with 99mTc Sestamibi Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 191 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. V. Narayanan, M. A. King, P. H. Pretorius, S. T. Dahlberg, F. Spencer, E. Simon, E. Ewald, E. Healy, K. MacNaught, and J. A. Leppo Human-Observer Receiver-Operating-Characteristic Evaluation of Attenuation, Scatter, and Resolution Compensation Strategies for 99mTc Myocardial Perfusion Imaging J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 1725 - 1734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Hayes, A. De Lorenzo, R. Hachamovitch, S. C. Dhar, P. Hsu, I. Cohen, J. D. Friedman, X. Kang, and D. S. Berman Prognostic Implications of Combined Prone and Supine Acquisitions in Patients with Equivocal or Abnormal Supine Myocardial Perfusion SPECT J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2003; 44(10): 1633 - 1640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Lee, J. C. Paeng, and M. C. Lee Implication of Prognostically Significant Negative Results on Prone SPECT J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2003; 44(10): 1641 - 1643. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Van Laere, J. Warwick, J. Versijpt, I. Goethals, K. Audenaert, B. Van Heerden, and R. Dierckx Analysis of Clinical Brain SPECT Data Based on Anatomic Standardization and Reference to Normal Data: An ROC-Based Comparison of Visual, Semiquantitative, and Voxel-Based Methods J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2002; 43(4): 458 - 469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. B. Gibson, D. Demus, R. Noto, W. Hudson, and L. L. Johnson Low event rate for stress-only perfusion imaging in patients evaluated for chest pain J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 20, 2002; 39(6): 999 - 1004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Hendel, J. R. Corbett, S. J. Cullom, E. G. DePuey, E. V. Garcia, and T. M. Bateman The Value and Practice of Attenuation Correction for Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Imaging: A Joint Position Statement from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology and the Society of Nuclear Medicine J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2002; 43(2): 273 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Harel, R. Genin, D. Daou, R. Lebtahi, N. Delahaye, B. O. Helal, D. Le Guludec, and M. Faraggi Clinical Impact of Combination of Scatter, Attenuation Correction, and Depth-Dependent Resolution Recovery for 201Tl Studies J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2001; 42(10): 1451 - 1456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|