Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1999;99:2323-2333

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garrigue, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mazgalev, T. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garrigue, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mazgalev, T. N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology
Right arrow Arrythmias-basic studies

(Circulation. 1999;99:2323-2333.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Basic Science Reports

Atrioventricular Nodal Conduction During Atrial Fibrillation

Role of Atrial Input Modification

Stéphane Garrigue, MD; Kent A. Mowrey, MS; Gerard Fahy, MD; Patrick J. Tchou, MD; Todor N. Mazgalev, PhD

From the Department of Cardiology, the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

Correspondence to Todor N. Mazgalev, PhD, Department of Cardiology/Desk FF1-02, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195. E-mail mazgalt{at}cesmtp.ccf.org


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Posteroseptal ablation of the atrioventricular node (AVN) has been proposed as a means to slow the ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation (AF). The suggested mechanism is elimination of the AVN "slow pathway." On the basis of the unpredictable success of the procedure, we hypothesize that, in fact, the slow pathway is preserved. Therefore, the slowing of the ventricular rate results from reduced bombardment of the AVN.

Methods and Results—In 8 rabbit heart atrial-AVN preparations, cooling of the posterior and/or the anterior AVN approaches revealed nonspecific effects on the slow and fast pathway portions of the AVN conduction curve. In 13 other preparations, simulated AF during posterior cooling (n=6) prolonged the His-His (H-H) intervals but did not reveal specific slow pathway injury. In the remaining 7 preparations, AF was applied before and after posteroseptal surgical cuts. During AF with posterior origin, the cuts resulted in longer mean H-H along with slowing of the AVN bombardment rate. However, there was no change in the minimum observed H-H, suggesting an intact slow pathway. During AF with anterior origin, the mean and the shortest H-H remained unchanged before and after the cuts in all preparations. This was associated with the maintenance of high-rate AVN bombardment.

Conclusions—Posteroseptal ablation does not eliminate the slow pathway. Ventricular rate slowing can be obtained if the ablation procedure results in a posteroanterior intra-atrial block leading to a reduction of the rate of AV nodal bombardment.


Key Words: atrioventricular node • fibrillation • electrophysiology • ventricles


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The atrioventricular node (AVN) is the natural barrier limiting conduction of atrial impulses into the His-Purkinje system during atrial fibrillation (AF). Dependence of refractoriness on the impulse rate,1 2 concealed conduction,3 4 and annihilation and summation5 6 of wave fronts contribute to the complex pattern of impulse propagation within the AVN. It is well known that "slow pathway" (SP) ablation, which corresponds clinically to posterior atrial-AVN input ablation, suppresses the incidence of AV junctional reentrant tachycardia. Indeed, recent investigations7 8 9 10 11 suggest that posterior perinodal atrial tissues form a part of the reentrant circuit.

A similar ablative technique has been developed to slow and regularize the ventricular rate (VR) during AF.12 13 The presumed mechanism of this procedure is the elimination of the putative SP that has a short refractory period.14 15 16 This new technique for AVN modification showed encouraging clinical results, but with inconsistent success rates among different investigators.17 18 Recently, one study19 pointed out that such a technique could eliminate the SP but might also cause nonspecific injury of the AVN. To clarify the electrophysiological mechanisms involved in this particular ablative therapy for VR slowing, we examined the effect of posteroseptal ablation performed close to but away from the compact node in superfused rabbit preparations during simulated AF. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the involvement of the dual AVN pathway electrophysiology in the determination of the VR during AF and the feasibility of eliminating the SP with ablation of the posteroseptal AVN approach. For this purpose, we evaluated the contributions of both anterior and posterior AVN approaches by using reversible thermoelectric cooling and surgical dissociation of the AVN inputs during standard stimulation protocols with prematurity and during AF simulated by high-rate random atrial pacing.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Atrioventricular Nodal Preparation
The experiments were performed in vitro in 22 preparations obtained from the hearts of New Zealand rabbits of either sex weighing 2 to 2.2 kg and anesthetized by sodium pentobarbital injection (50 mg/kg) into an ear vein. After a midsternal incision, the heart was removed and placed in an oxygenated room-temperature Tyrode's solution (pH 7.30 to 7.35) previously described.20 After trimming, the final preparation contained right atrial tissues as shown in Figure 1ADown. The crista terminalis (CrT) divides this preparation into posterior (Figure 1ADown, left) and anterior (Figure 1ADown, right) sides. The preparations were pinned down on a thin silicon disk (endocardial surface up) and transferred into a thermostat-controlled glass chamber for superfusion at 35.5°C.



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of isolated rabbit heart atrial-AV nodal preparation. A, Intact preparation and major landmarks: musculae pectinatis, MP; crista terminalis, CrT; superior vena cava, SVC; inferior vena cava, IVC; tendon of Todaro, tT; atrioventricular node, AVN; fossa ovalis, FO; interatrial septum, IAS; bundle of His, His; high right atrium, HRA; mid right atrial appendage, MRA; coronary sinus, CS; posterior approach to the AV node (crista terminalis input), PA; high right atrial septum, HS; anterior approach to the AV node (interatrial septal input), AA; and tricuspid valve, TrV. Elliptical frames indicate 6 sites used for randomized pacing. {circ}, Bipolar recording electrodes. B, Dissociation of AVN from posterior approach by a through-cut from TrV to tT. C, Further modification of preparation from B to create a model of posteroanterior dissociation. See text for details.

Electrical Stimulation and Recordings
Bipolar stimulating and recording electrodes (0.5-mm interelectrode distance) were custom-made from 0.20-mm Teflon-insulated platinum-iridium wire. Electrical stimuli (2 ms, twice diastolic threshold) were applied at different sites of the preparation (ellipses in Figure 1AUp), as explained later. Bipolar electrodes for recording surface electrograms (small circles in Figure 1AUp) were placed at the CrT and the interatrial septal (IAS) input sites of the AVN and at the bundle of His (H). All electrodes were positioned with micromanipulators (WPI, M330). The stimulating electrodes were connected to optically isolated stimulator units (WPI, A360). An 8-channel programmable stimulator (AMPI, Master-8) determined the stimulation sequence. The recording electrodes were connected first to high-resistance, differential-input probes and then to an 8-channel, programmable amplifier (Axon Instruments, CyberAmp 380). Signals were monitored on a storage oscilloscope (Tektronix 2216). They were also digitally recorded on tape (Vetter Digital, 4000A) for offline computer analysis (AxoScope, Axon Instruments).

Stimulation Protocols
The spontaneous mean sinus cycle length at the start of the experiments was 361±23 ms. The basic paced cycle length was 300 ms in all preparations, and the mean basic conduction time (CrT-to-His) was 69±5 ms. The compact AVN was localized by use of anatomic and functional criteria. Specifically, the exact location of the compact node (within 1 mm) was determined by mapping the apex of the triangle of Koch with subthreshold postganglionic vagal stimulation.21 The site at which maximum depression of conduction was achieved in response to this stimulation was assumed to be the compact AVN. Care was taken to avoid any damage to this area during cooling and surgical procedures.

Three groups of experiments (A, B, and C) were performed as explained below.

Experiments A (n=8) were performed to evaluate the effect of cooling of the anterior and posterior AVN approaches on dual-pathway electrophysiology during prematurity pacing protocols. Two thermoelectric cooling probes that used the Peltier effect (Novoste Corp) with 3.75-mm2 tips were placed posteriorly at the isthmus between the tricuspid annulus and the coronary sinus (CS) ostium and at the low anterior IAS.

The stimulation protocol consisted of basic drive, followed by premature stimuli during control, followed by cooling. The basic drive consisted of 21 beats (S1) and was performed by simultaneous stimulation at the IAS and CrT at a cycle length of 300 ms. The test beat (S2) followed. The first S1S2 was 300 ms and was progressively decreased by 5 ms in each cycle until nodal or atrial refractoriness was encountered.

Experiments B (n=6 preparations) were used to independently assess the role of the anterior and posterior AVN inputs on the VR during random high-rate atrial pacing. Two different ranges of coupling intervals (125 to 300 ms and 90 to 300 ms) were used for the random pacing in each preparation. For each range, the same AF run was repeated in control and during reversible cooling (15°C) applied consecutively at the posterior, anterior, and both AVN inputs.

Experiments C (n=7 preparations) were used to evaluate the role of surgical modification of the posterior approaches for slowing of the VR. A computerized, random, high-rate atrial pacing simulated AF (range, 75 to 150 ms). The same stimulation sequence was applied in random order at 6 atrial-pacing sites (ellipses in Figure 1AUp): 3 on the posterior side (high right atrium, mid right atrial appendage, and posterior AVN [PA] approaches) and 3 on the anteroseptal side (high septum, above the CS, and anterior AVN approaches). Five hundred electrogram intervals measured at the bundle of His recording site (H-H) were analyzed in each episode.

Each of the 7 AVN preparations was studied in 3 morphological configurations. The intact AVN preparation represented the control (Figure 1AUp). In the second configuration, a surgical cut of the PA was performed (Figure 1BUp). This cut started at the septal leaflet of the tricuspid valve (TrV) and proceeded up to the ostium of the CS inside the triangle of Koch. The tendon of Todaro was kept intact. This configuration was called the CPA ("cut posterior approach"). In the third configuration (Figure 1CUp), a cut was initiated from the top of the preparation downward to the ostium of the inferior vena cava to separate the CrT and the septal part of the right atrium. In addition, the cut shown in Figure 1BUp was extended farther up to the ostium of the inferior vena cava so that only a narrow isthmus remained between the posterior and anterior sides of the preparation. The isthmus could be cooled down to 15°C by thermoelectric probe.

In addition to the 21 preparations reported above, 1 additional preparation was used for confirmation of the reproducibility of the simulated AF pacing protocol (see Results).

Data Acquisition
Activation times at the 2 atrial recording sites, the CrT and the IAS inputs, and the bundle of His were determined with 1-ms precision. These activation times were used to plot conduction curves as well as to determine electrogram intervals measured at the posterior crista terminalis input (CrT-CrT), the anterior interatrial septal input (IAS-IAS), and H-H intervals.

In experiments A, conduction curves S2H2 (S1S2) were generated in control and after cooling of the inputs. In addition, the effective refractory period (ERP) of the AVN was defined as the minimum S1S2 associated with AVN conduction.

In experiments B, the histogram distribution of the 500 recorded H-H intervals was analyzed in control and during 3 subsequent coolings in each preparation. A total of 48 episodes were analyzed by comparison of the H-H distributions between control and cooling.

In experiments C, for each simulated AF episode, CrT-CrT, IAS-IAS, and H-H intervals were measured and averaged. The ratio of the number of CrT-CrT intervals to the number of IAS-IAS intervals (N[CrT]/N[IAS]) and the ratio of the number of IAS-IAS intervals to the number of H-H intervals (N[IAS]/N[H]) were calculated before and after CPA. These parameters were used to quantify the degree of intra-atrial and AVN-His conduction, respectively.

In addition, the consecutive CrT-CrT, IAS-IAS, and H-H intervals were plotted as Lorenz plots, the abscissa representing the value of the nth interval and the ordinate representing the nth+1 interval. This method of presentation facilitated the visualization of the minimal observed intervals as well as the degree of interval dispersion. The latter was called a scattering index (S[{Pi}]) and was calculated as

where xi and yi are the current and next values of the intervals measured at the respective site {Pi} (ie, CrT, IAS, or bundle of His recording site, H), n is the number of measured intervals, and X and Y are the coordinates of the center of the scatterogram.

Statistical Analysis
In experiments A, the ERP and the maximum achieved AVN conduction time were compared between control and cooling by use of the nonparametric paired Wilcoxon test. In experiments B, the H-H intervals were compared between control and cooling by use of a 4-level repeated-measures within-factor analysis. In experiments C, 84 consecutive AF episodes were analyzed before and after the CPA. Multifactorial ANOVA for repeated-measures studies was performed to evaluate the influence of each of the 6 pacing sites on the measured intervals before and after the CPA. Polynomial and linear correlation analyses were performed to assess the relationship between the CrT-CrT, IAS-IAS, and H-H before and after the CPA. A value of P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Effect of Perinodal Input Cooling on the AVN Conduction Curve (Experiments A)
In all 8 preparations, "smooth" AVN conduction curves were generated in response to the baseline pacing protocol. Data are shown in Table 1Down. In 2 of the 8 preparations, posterior cooling away from the compact node resulted in AVN conduction time prolongation of short-coupled atrial beats only (Figure 2Down). In the remaining 6 preparations, the cooling probe had to be placed more anteriorly to observe S2H2 prolongation at short coupling intervals. This, however, was associated with a prolongation of S2H2 at long coupling intervals that was proportional to the temperature, suggesting some cooling of the compact node (Figure 3Down). In all preparations (Table 1Down), posterior cooling increased the AVN ERP (135±8 versus 103±4 ms) and decreased the maximum observed AVN conduction time (146±7 versus 180±14 ms).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of AV Nodal Conduction During Reversible Cooling of the Posterior and Anterior Approaches



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effect of posterior cooling to 15°C on AVN conduction curve. Note that most marked prolongation of conduction time S2H2 was seen at shortest S1S2 intervals.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Temperature-dependency of effects of posterior cooling. In this, as in 5 other preparations, increasing cooling produced some S2H2 prolongation also at long S1S2.

With the cooling probe located at the apex of the triangle of Koch, it was impossible to identify an anterior region that, when cooled, caused specific effects only at long coupling intervals (Figure 4Down). A variable effect on the AVN ERP was noted (Table 1Up), with an increase in 5 preparations, a decrease in 2, and no change in 1. This suggested that the area of the anterior AVN input was in close proximity to the compact node. Thus, it was difficult to avoid direct nodal cooling.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of anterior cooling to 15°C on AVN conduction curve. Note a nondifferential effect on conduction time at long and short coupling intervals.

These data showed that localized cooling of the AVN inputs did not produce effects compatible with the presence of 2 distinct pathways/channels outside the compact node, which had discrete atrial attachments. Specifically, the SP appeared to receive a broader input wave front, not limited to the posterior approaches alone. However, the inevitable probability of some remote cooling effect on the compact node did not permit a conclusive rejection of the hypothesis of discrete posterior attachment of the SP.

Reproducibility of Interval Measurements During Simulated AF
The mean data from the preparation used to evaluate the reproducibility of interval measurements during AF are shown in Table 2Down. Each of the CrT-CrT, IAS-IAS, and H-H intervals was measured in 2 consecutive trials performed from each of the 6 pacing sites. The differences between the mean intervals in trials 1 and 2 did not exceed 3 ms. The intraclass correlation coefficients for the mean intervals ranged from 0.97 to 0.99. Thus, repetitive AF episodes were associated with a high degree of reproducibility of all measured time intervals. This permitted multiple comparisons in the subsequent studies.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Intraclass Correlation of Repeated Intervals Measurements in 1 Rabbit Heart Preparation

H-H Histograms in AVN Preparations During AF and Selective Cooling of the Posterior and Anterior Inputs (Experiments B)
It has been hypothesized that a 2-peak H-H histogram could reveal the dual-pathway AVN electrophysiology during AF.22 The shorter H-H peak has been thought to represent the SP, whereas the longer H-H peak should correspond to the fast pathway. In our study, 10 of the 12 control AF episodes exhibited a 2-peak distribution (Table 3Down). We expected that, according to the above hypothesis, localized cooling of the AVN inputs would transform the 2-peak histograms into a single-peak (bell-shape) distribution.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Mean H-H Intervals and Their Distribution During Localized Cooling of the Posterior and Anterior AV Node Inputs

Data in Table 3Up illustrate that anterior input cooling did not change the mean H-H interval (262±22 versus 256±27 ms). In contrast, cooling of the posterior AVN input resulted in a significant mean H-H interval prolongation (327±29 ms). A similar effect was observed with cooling of both inputs (336±41 ms). However, transformation of the 2-peak histograms into a bell-shape distribution was seen in only 1 episode with posterior cooling and 3 episodes with simultaneous anterior and posterior cooling (Table 3Up). Figure 5Down shows an example of a 2-peak histogram in control that remained with 2 peaks after the input cooling. Notice that the peaks were shifted to the right with posterior cooling, whereas they remained similar to control during anterior cooling. In addition, the cooling procedures did not eliminate the occurrence of the shortest H-H intervals (in this case, {approx}150 ms, arrows). Figure 6Down illustrates the only case in which a control 2-peak H-H histogram was transformed into a histogram with 1 predominant peak after posterior cooling. However, there were 3 peaks after anterior cooling and 2 peaks after cooling of both inputs. There was no case in which cooling of a particular input resulted in elimination of 1 peak without influencing the other peak(s) of the histogram.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. A typical example of input cooling–induced changes in H-H histograms during AF. Note that 2-peak control histogram remained with 2 peaks (*) after cooling of inputs. Note also that shortest H-H intervals observed in control (H-H interval {approx}150 ms) were also present during cooling.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Rare example of 2-peak histogram in control, which was transformed into a single-peak histogram during posterior cooling. See text for discussion.

The above data did not exclude the possibility that bimodal H-H histograms during AF may result from dual-pathway electrophysiology. However, cooling of the proposed discrete atrial attachments of the pathways did not reveal a link between a particular peak and a pathway. This suggested that either the atrial connections of the pathways were not discrete or/and that each peak resulted from a complex participation of both pathways.

Observations During AF and Before and After the CPA (Experiments C)
The reasoning to choose the microsurgical cut procedure (instead of cooling) was to dissociate the posterior approach while minimizing any indirect damaging effect on the compact AVN. On the basis of the effect produced by the CPA on the VR, the preparations were split into group 1 and group 2.

One preparation from group 1 is illustrated in Figure 7Down. The data were obtained with a PA pacing site (Figure 1AUp). Short CrT-CrT (112±28 ms, A), short IAS-IAS (195±41 ms, C), and longer H-H (330±108 ms, E) intervals were observed before CPA. After CPA, the CrT-CrT intervals remained unchanged (112±31 ms, B), as expected, because the cut was distal to the recording site (see Figure 1BUp). In contrast, both the IAS-IAS (524±181 ms, D) and the H-H (523±183 ms, F) intervals increased substantially. Similar results were observed in 4 preparations.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Lorenz plot obtained in a preparation from group 1 during AF initiated from PA site. Note that surgical CPA procedure (B, D, and F) resulted in a dramatic increase of IAS-IAS and H-H intervals.

Different results were observed in the preparations from group 2, as shown in Figure 8Down. After CPA (B, D, and F), even though the CrT-CrT remained similar (112±28 versus 112±25 ms), the IAS-IAS increased (232±47 versus 189±31 ms), and the H-H shortened (235±75 versus 284±91 ms). Qualitatively similar results were observed in 3 preparations.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Lorenz plot obtained in a preparation from group 2 during AF initiated from PA site. Note that surgical CPA procedure (B, D, and F) resulted in a moderate increase of IAS-IAS intervals and a decrease of H-H intervals.

Data obtained with all pacing sites were summarized in Tables 4Down and 5Down. We will analyze first the data obtained with posterior pacing, then the observations obtained with anterior pacing.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Electrophysiological Data Before and After Cutting of the AV Nodal Posterior Approach With Pacing From Posterior Atrial Sites


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Electrophysiological Data Before and After Cutting of the AV Nodal Posterior Approach With Pacing From Anterior Atrial Sites

Effects of CPA During AF Initiated From the Posterior Sites
As shown in Figure 9ADown, the mean H-H in group 1 significantly increased after CPA independently of the posterior pacing site (352±26 versus 261±7 ms, P<0.01). In contrast, in group 2 preparations (Figure 9BDown), there was a significant H-H shortening after CPA (275±9 versus 298±7 ms, P<0.05). One may speculate that the above results indicated elimination of the SP in group 1. However, the shortest observed H-H intervals (representing the refractory properties of the SP) increased only slightly in group 1 and even decreased in group 2 (Table 4Up). This suggested that the surgical procedure did not result in a selective elimination of the SP AVN conduction.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. Contrasting effects of CPA on VR in group 1 (A) and group 2 (B) preparations when AF was initiated from 3 posterior sites (HRA, mid right atrial appendage, PA). See Table 4Up for detailed numerical values. Note prolongation of the mean H-H in A and shortening in B. *P<0.05.

An important difference was found between the 2 groups when the IAS-IAS intervals before and after CPA were compared (Figure 10Down). In group 1, the increase of this interval reached 151±78 ms, whereas in group 2, it was only 72±37 ms (P<0.01). We interpreted this as an indication of a better intra-atrial conduction in group 2 over the remaining posteroanterior connections after the CPA. To test this hypothesis, we modified the preparations in group 2 by creating an isthmus between the posterior and anterior atrial sides(see Figure 1CUp). This procedure did not change the mean intervals (data not shown). Consequently, we cooled the isthmus, and the result was a dramatic IAS-IAS increase (Figure 10BDown, dashed line) from 72±37 ms before the isthmus modification to 145±81 ms thereafter (P<0.01). The H-H increased from 275±9 ms after the CPA to 328±18 ms after the cooling of the isthmus (P<0.01, Figure 10BDown, dashed line). Thus, as in group 1, the slowing of the septal AVN bombardment resulted in slowing of the VR.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 10. CPA-induced changes in H-H, IAS-IAS, and CrT-CrT intervals in group 1 (A) and group 2 (B) with posterior pacing. In group 2, an additional surgical procedure was performed to channel posteroanterior conduction through a cooled narrow isthmus (B, dashed lines). Significant changes in the mean intervals are indicated by * (P<0.05).

The role of the CPA-induced changes in the IAS-IAS intervals for the subsequent changes in the H-H intervals is further illustrated in Figure 11Down by data combined from all preparations. There was a strong second-order polynomial correlation of 0.92 (P<0.001). Therefore, a small IAS-IAS increase (as in group 2 before the isthmus modification) induced H-H shortening, whereas an IAS-IAS increase beyond 150 ms (as in group 1) induced a significant H-H prolongation.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 11. Correlation between CPA-produced change in IAS-IAS intervals and subsequent changes in H-H intervals in all preparations studied with posterior pacing.

Detailed data obtained during pacing from all posterior sites in group 1 and group 2 preparations are summarized in Table 4Up. In control, for both groups, the blocking index N(CrT)/N(IAS) was always >1, indicating that anterior AVN input was less frequently bombarded than posterior input. This is not surprising, because the pacing was applied at posterior sites, and some impulses were blocked before reaching the anterior input. After CPA, the above N(CrT)/N(IAS) ratio increased significantly in both groups (2.44±0.25 versus 1.26±0.27 for group 1, P<0.01, and 1.69±0.17 versus 1.14±0.13 for group 2, P<0.05). Note, however, that the blocking index after CPA was significantly larger (P<0.01) in group 1, confirming the higher degree of functional posteroanterior atrial block produced by the CPA in this group.

The index N(IAS)/N(H), determined after the CPA, represents the degree of filtering between the remaining anterior input and the output of the AVN (note that the CPA disengaged the posterior approach to the AVN). It is important to stress that this index was similar in both groups (Table 4Up, 1.29±0.10 and 1.40±0.11). Thus, the longer H-H intervals in group 1 versus group 2 after CPA were not related to different filtering properties of the AVN. Rather, the slower input rate (longer IAS-IAS intervals) after CPA in group 1 was the likely explanation for the H-H prolongation in this group.

The above conclusion is further supported by the comparison of the scattering indexes between group 1 and group 2. S(CrT) remained unchanged after CPA in both groups (Table 4Up). In contrast, there was a highly significant increase of S(IAS) and S(H) in group 1, resulting from the higher degree of intra-atrial block and the consequent presence of long IAS-IAS and H-H intervals (see also Figure 7Up). The changes in the S(IAS) and S(H) observed after the CPA in group 2 were much smaller (Table 4Up, P<0.01).

Effects of CPA During AF Initiated From the Anterior Sites
The different effects produced by the CPA in groups 1 and 2 during pacing from the posterior sites (see above) were no longer present when AF was initiated from the anterior sites of the preparations. This correlated well with the preserved level of anterior AVN bombardment before and after the CPA.

As shown in Figure 12Down, in contrast to the observations in Figure 9Up, there was no increase in the mean H-H interval in group 1 for each of the 3 anterior pacing sites. In group 2, there was a small shortening of the H-H (280±14 versus 306±23 ms, P<0.05). In both groups, there was no increase of the minimal H-H. In fact, the CPA produced some shortening of the minimal observed H-H intervals (Table 5Up). These observations argued against the hypothesis that the surgical cut entirely eliminated the slow AVN pathway.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 12. CPA-induced changes in H-H intervals in group 1 (A) and group 2 (B) with 3 anterior pacing sites (CS, AA, and HS). Abbreviations as in Figure 1Up. See Table 5Up for detailed numerical values. Note that the mean H-H intervals did not increase and were even shortened in B. *P<0.05.

Figure 13Down summarizes the data for all mean intervals during anterior pacing before and after CPA. Importantly, the CPA did not result in a significant change of the mean IAS-IAS in both groups. Neither linear nor polynomial correlation was found (r=-0.18 and r=-0.22, respectively, P=NS) between the {Delta}IAS-IAS intervals and the {Delta}H-H intervals (Figure 14Down). Thus, the lack of change in the degree of anterior bombardment resulted in lack of change in the VR after the CPA.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 13. CPA-induced changes in H-H, IAS-IAS, and CrT-CrT intervals in group 1 (A) and group 2 (B) with anterior pacing. Note that, unlike cases with posterior pacing (Figure 10Up), here IAS-IAS intervals remained unchanged. Consequently, there was no prolongation of H-H intervals. Significant changes in the mean intervals are indicated by * (P<0.05).



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 14. Relationship between CPA-produced change in IAS-IAS intervals and subsequent change in H-H intervals in all preparations studied with anterior pacing.

As shown in Table 5Up, in contrast to the observations made during posterior site pacing (Table 4Up), the N(IAS)/N(CrT) ratio changed much less after the CPA. Similarly, the scattering index S(CrT) did not change significantly. This suggested that, although the CPA resulted in some intra-atrial block, the degree of the latter was much less in the anteroposterior direction.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present study was designed to evaluate what role modification of the atrial inputs to the AVN has on filtering during high atrial rates. In particular, we tested the hypothesis that posterior modification results in ablation (destruction) of the slow AVN pathway, which is considered the major conduction route for closely coupled atrial impulses. The results obtained in the present study demonstrate that a model based on the putative presence of channels (slow and fast pathways) providing discrete connections between the AVN and the atrium is not applicable during simulated AF. Surgical dissociation of the AVN from its posterior approach did not eliminate the shortest H-H intervals and did not guarantee slowing of the VR. Our data are compatible with the hypothesis that the slow and fast pathways are nodal structures that may remain intact even after ablative procedures. The VR during AF therefore depends on the complex interaction of wave fronts propagating via the slow and the fast pathways. Surgical or ablative procedures can modulate the VR by altering the pattern of atrial bombardment reaching the posterior and anterior AVN inputs.

Slow and Fast Pathways: Discrete Conduction Channels Versus Functional Nodal Entities
Despite the attractiveness of the hypothesis of pathways/channels with discrete atrial connections, convincing morphological evidence for their existence is missing. It has been demonstrated10 that the atrial fibers form a complex multidirectional structure at the AVN approaches. Interestingly, successful AVN reentrant tachycardia ablation procedures may not affect the compact AVN at all.10 Conversely, characteristic posterior extensions of the AVN have been reported,11 and successful slow-pathway ablation has been attributed to damage inflicted on these extensions.23 The electrophysiological evidence is also conflicting. Electrical signals recorded in the region of the posterior AVN approaches (the "slow" potentials) appear to have an extranodal origin.24 25 26 To make the whole picture even more complex, recent experimental work described a third AVN pathway.27

The observations in the present study, obtained with localized reversible cooling of the AVN inputs, did not reveal specific channel structures. Posterior cooling (Figures 2Up and 3Up) was partially successful in differentially affecting the conduction time of short-coupled atrial beats. This effect could have resulted from depressed conduction in the posterior AVN extensions11 and confirms the importance of this atrial input for conduction at short coupling intervals. Cooling of the anterior atrial approaches (Figure 4Up) failed to produce a specific effect on the conduction (ie, only at long coupling intervals). It should be realized, however, that both the cooling and the clinical radiofrequency ablations may affect not only the putative discrete insertion of the SP but also the compact node itself.

We also tested the hypothesis that the discrete duality of AVN electrophysiology can be evaluated during AF by examination of H-H interval distribution, which was shown to exhibit 2-peak histograms in limited clinical studies.22 28 Our results did not support such a hypothesis.

In view of the above, it becomes logical to investigate whether the "SP modification" used for VR control in AF results in elimination of the SP conduction or rather in elimination of just 1 important connection between the pathway and the atrium.

Alteration of the Filtering Role of the AVN During AF
The results from the present study illustrate 2 contrasting outcomes of the CPA procedure (Figure 1Up). The latter was used to mimic clinically performed SP modification for ventricular slowing during AF. As in clinical studies,12 13 14 15 16 18 discontinuation of the connection between the AVN and the posterior atrial approaches in the isthmus between the CS and TrV did not guarantee VR slowing in our preparations. Most importantly, however, the CPA had little effect on the shortest H-H intervals that are related to the SP (Figures 7Up and 8Up). That is, even in those cases in which the CPA resulted in a prolongation of the mean H-H interval, the shortest H-H intervals were similar to those observed in control (Tables 4Up and 5Up). Careful examination of the underlying mechanisms revealed that in the experimental model used in these studies, the CPA procedure resulted in dramatic changes of the atrial engagement of the AVN.

In group 1 preparations, the isthmus between the CS and the TrV was the major route through which the triangle of Koch was reached during pacing from the posterior sites. Cutting of this link proved to be critical because of the presence of substantial functional block across the CrT that prevented the high-rate AF to reach the node via the anterior approaches. The result was a substantial slowing of the VR (Figures 9Up and 10Up). The reason for this slowing was the marked prolongation of the mean IAS-IAS observed at the site of the remaining intact anterior input. This dramatic slowing of the atrial bombardment reaching the AVN permitted a virtual 1:1 conduction to the bundle of His (Figure 7Up). However, when the AF was initiated from the anterior sites, the CPA procedure had no effect on the filtering properties of the AVN in these preparations (Figures 12Up and 13Up). Thus, as long as the high-rate bombardment was present, the AVN produced H-H rates similar to those before the CPA procedure. This outcome would not be possible if the SP were eliminated after the CPA.

In group 2 preparations, the CPA did not slow the VR during posterior pacing (Figures 9Up and 10Up). In fact, a small acceleration was observed. In these preparations, accordingly, there was a much smaller degree of posteroanterior functional block. Further increase of the intra-atrial block in these preparations by cooling (Figure 1CUp) produced effects that were very similar to those described in group 1 (Figure 10Up).

Thus, the contrasting behavior observed in the 2 groups of preparations can be explained without assuming success or failure of the CPA procedure in eliminating the SP entirely. In fact, the experimental data suggest that SP conduction was intact in all preparations and that short H-H intervals continued to exist even after the CPA. The major difference between the 2 groups of preparations was in the degree of intra-atrial conduction block that was revealed after the CPA.

Although tempting, the results of the present study should be extended to clinical observations with caution. There are several reasons why the modification might result in successful or unsuccessful slowing of the VR during AF. First, like the mechanisms analyzed in the present study, the clinical modification may result in substantial altering of the effective rate of bombardment of the AVN. Second, because the radiofrequency ablation is not strictly confined in space, damage to the posterior extensions of the compact node and even to the compact node cannot be ruled out. This may result in successful VR slowing independent of the predominant source(s) of fibrillatory waves.

Limitations of the Study
The limitations of this study are determined by the experimental models and pacing protocols used. The high-rate random atrial pacing was used to simulate AF. Although it permitted us to initiate the same fibrillatory process multiple times and therefore allowed multiple comparisons, the real AF organization in the human heart may be different. The intra-atrial blocks observed in this study may not be a feature of the fibrillating human heart or may have different locations and therefore exert different effects. However, by illustrating the coexistence of cut posterior approaches and intact compact AVN, the present study strongly suggests that similar situations may be present during clinical AVN modification procedures.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This research was supported in part by grant 9807701 from the American Heart Association (Ohio Valley Affiliate). Dr Garrigue was a Visiting Research Fellow from Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France. The authors thank Dr D. Van Wagoner for his help with the final preparation of the manuscript.

Received September 24, 1998; revision received December 11, 1998; accepted December 30, 1998.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Fisher JD. Role of electrophysiologic testing in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with known and suspected bradycardias and tachycardias. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1981;24:25–90.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Toivonen L, Kadish A, Kou W, Morady F. Determinants of the ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:1194–1200.[Abstract]
  3. Langendorf R, Pick A, Katz LN. Ventricular response in atrial fibrillation: role of concealed conduction in the AV node. Circulation. 1965;32:69–75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Moore EN, Knoebel SB, Spear JF. Concealed conduction. Am J Cardiol. 1971;28:406–413.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Janse MJ. Influence of the direction of the atrial wave front on A-V nodal transmission in isolated hearts of rabbits. Circ Res. 1969;25:439–449.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Zipes DP, Mendez C, Moe GK. Evidence for summation and voltage dependency in rabbit atrioventricular nodal fibers. Circ Res. 1973;32:170–177.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Cox JL, Holman WL, Cain ME. Cryosurgical treatment of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. Circulation. 1987;76:1329–1336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. McGuire MA, Lau KC, Johnson DC, Richards DA, Uther JB, Ross DL. Patients with 2 types of atrioventricular junctional (AV nodal) reentrant tachycardia: evidence that a common pathway of nodal tissue is not present above the reentrant circuit. Circulation. 1991;83:1232–1246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Keim S, Werner P, Jazayeri M, Akhtar M, Tchou P. Localization of the fast and slow pathways in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia by intraoperative ice mapping. Circulation. 1992;86:919–925.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Sanchez-Quintana D, Wyn Davies D, Ho SY, Oslizlok P, Anderson RH. Architecture of the atrial musculature in and around the triangle of Koch: its potential relevance to atrioventricular nodal reentry. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997;8:1396–1407.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Inoue S, Becker AE. Posterior extensions of the human compact atrioventricular node: a neglected anatomic feature of potential clinical significance. Circulation. 1998;97:188–193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Williamson BD, Man KC, Daoud E, Niebauer M, Strickberger SA, Morady F. Radiofrequency catheter modification of atrioventricular conduction to control the ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:910–917.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Feld GK, Fleck RP, Fujimura O, Prothro DL, Bahnson TD, Ibarra M. Control of rapid ventricular response by radiofrequency catheter modification of the atrioventricular node in patients with medically refractory atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1994;90:2299–2307.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Chen SA, Lee SH, Chiang CE, Tai CT, Wu TJ, Cheng CC, Wen ZC, Chiou CW, Ueng KC, Chang MS. Electrophysiological mechanisms in successful radiofrequency catheter modification of atrioventricular junction for patients with medically refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1996;93:1690–1701.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Markowitz SM, Stein KM, Lerman BB. Mechanism of ventricular rate control after radiofrequency modification of atrioventricular conduction in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1996;94:2856–2864.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kreiner G, Heinz G, Siostrzonek P, Gossinger HD. Effect of slow pathway ablation on ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation: dependence on electrophysiological properties of the fast pathway. Circulation. 1996;93:277–283.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Morady F, Hasse C, Strickberger SA, Man KC, Daoud E, Bogun F, Goyal R, Harvey M, Knight BP, Weiss R, Bahu M. Long-term follow-up after radiofrequency modification of the atrioventricular node in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:113–121.[Abstract]
  18. Feld GK. Radiofrequency catheter ablation versus modification of the AV node for control of rapid ventricular response in atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1995;6:217–228.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Krahn AD, Klein GJ, Yee R, Basta MN, Lee JK. Progressive anterior ablation in the coronary sinus region: evidence to support the presence of a "slow pathway" input in normal patients? Circulation. 1997;96:3477–3483.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Tchou PJ, Cheng YN, Mowrey K, Efimov IR, Van Wagoner DR, Mazgalev TN. Relation of the atrial input sites to the dual atrioventricular nodal pathways: crossing of conduction curves generated with posterior and anterior pacing. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997;8:1133–1144.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Imaizumi S, Mazgalev T, Dreifus LS, Michelson EL, Miyagawa A, Bharati S, Lev M. Morphological and electrophysiological correlates of atrioventricular nodal response to increased vagal activity. Circulation. 1990;82:951–964.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Shenasa M, Shenasa H. Distinct "bimodal distribution" in R-R interval histograms during atrial fibrillation: implications for radiofrequency current modification of the A-V node. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995;18(part 2):II-189. Abstract.
  23. Inoue S, Becker AE, Gaita F. Interruption of the posterior extension of the compact atrioventricular node underlies successful radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998;21(part 2):II-25. Abstract.
  24. Jackman WM, Beckman KJ, McClelland JH, Wang X, Friday KJ, Roman CA, Moulton KP, Twidale N, Hazlitt HA, Prior MI, Oren J, Overholt ED, Lazzara R. Treatment of supraventricular tachycardia due to atrioventricular nodal reentry by radiofrequency catheter ablation of slow-pathway conduction. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:313–318.[Abstract]
  25. McGuire MA, de Bakker JM, Vermeulen JT, Opthof T, Becker AE, Janse MJ. Origin and significance of double potentials near the atrioventricular node: correlation of extracellular potentials, intracellular potentials, and histology. Circulation. 1994;89:2351–2360.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Haïssaguerre M, Shah DC, Jaïs P. Slow potentials and catheter ablation for AVNRT. Heart. 1997;78:1–2.[Free Full Text]
  27. Antz M, Scherlag BJ, Otomo K, Pitha J, Tondo C, Patterson E, Jackman WM, Lazzara R. Evidence for multiple atrio-AV nodal inputs in the normal dog heart. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998;9:395–408.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Olsson SB, Cai N, Dohnal M, Talwar KK. Noninvasive support for and characterization of multiple intranodal pathways in patients with mitral valve disease and atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 1986;7:320–333.We investigated whether posteroseptal ablation of the atrioventricular node (AVN) during atrial fibrillation (AF) requires elimination of the slow pathway for ventricular rate slowing. AF was simulated before and after posteroseptal surgical cut. After the cut, only AF with posterior origin resulted in ventricular rate slowing but without change in the minimum ventricular intervals. The rate of AVN bombardment was significantly reduced. Posteroseptal ablation does not eliminate the slow pathway. Ventricular rate slowing can be obtained if the ablation procedure results in a posteroanterior intra-atrial block, leading to a reduction of the rate of AVN bombardment.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
Y. Zhang, S. Bharati, K. A. Mowrey, and T. N. Mazgalev
His Electrogram Alternans Reveal Dual Atrioventricular Nodal Pathway Conduction During Atrial Fibrillation: The Role of Slow-Pathway Modification
Circulation, February 25, 2003; 107(7): 1059 - 1065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Y. Zhang, S. Bharati, K. A. Mowrey, S. Zhuang, P. J. Tchou, and T. N. Mazgalev
His Electrogram Alternans Reveal Dual-Wavefront Inputs Into and Longitudinal Dissociation Within the Bundle of His
Circulation, August 14, 2001; 104(7): 832 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
A. C Rankin and A. J Workman
Rate control in atrial fibrillation: role of atrial inputs to the AV node
Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 1999; 44(2): 249 - 251.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
S. Garrigue, P. J. Tchou, and T. N. Mazgalev
Role of the differential bombardment of atrial inputs to the atrioventricular node as a factor influencing ventricular rate during high atrial rate
Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 1999; 44(2): 344 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar