(Circulation. 1999;99:2132-2137.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Divisione di Cardiologia, Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, (P.S.); Istituto di Malattie dell'Apparato Cardiovascolare, Università di Bologna, Policlinico Sant'Orsola, Bologna (C.R.); Divisione di Cardiologia, Ospedale Santa Corona, Pietra Ligure (P. Bellone); II Faculta di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università di Napoli (S.B); Dipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari e Respiratorie, Università La Sapienza, Rome (C.A.); Divisione di Cardiologia, Ospedale degli Infermi, Rivoli, Torino (M.R.C.); Cattedra di Cardiologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Università degli Studi, Genoa (G.P.B.); and Servizio di Epidemiologia Clinica, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa (P. Bruzzi).
Correspondence to Paolo Spirito, MD, Divisione di Cardiologia, Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera, Via Volta 8, 16128 Genoa, Italy. E-mail p.spirito{at}galliera.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsWe assessed the occurrence of endocarditis in
810 HCM patients evaluated between 1970 and 1997. Endocarditis was
diagnosed in 10 patients, 2 of whom were excluded from analysis
of prevalence and incidence because they were referred for acute
endocarditis. At first evaluation, echocardiographic
features consistent with prior endocarditis were identified in
3 of 808 patients, a prevalence of 3.7 per 1000 patients (95% CI, 0.8
to 11). Of 681 patients who were followed, 5 developed endocarditis, an
incidence of 1.4 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 0.5 to 3.2); outflow
obstruction was present in each of these 5 patients and was
associated with the risk of endocarditis (P=0.006). In
the 224 obstructive patients, incidence of endocarditis was 3.8 per
1000 person-years (95% CI, 1.6 to 8.9) and probability of endocarditis
4.3% at 10 years. Left atrial size was also associated with the risk
of endocarditis (P=0.007). In patients with both
obstruction and atrial dilatation (
50 mm), incidence of
endocarditis increased to 9.2 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 2.5 to
23.5). Analysis of all 10 patients with endocarditis identified
outflow obstruction in each and atrial dilatation in 7.
ConclusionsEndocarditis in HCM is virtually confined to patients with outflow obstruction and is more common in those with both obstruction and atrial dilatation. These results indicate that antibiotic prophylaxis is required only in patients with obstructive HCM.
Key Words: hypertrophy cardiomyopathy echocardiography
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, we have investigated the occurrence of infective endocarditis in a population of more than 800 patients with HCM. Our observations provide an estimate of the prevalence and incidence of infective endocarditis in this disease. Our findings also identify the clinical features associated with an increased risk of developing this complication and lead to specific recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis in HCM.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
15 mm in adults or the equivalent in children) in the
absence of other cardiac or systemic diseases that could produce
comparable left ventricular
hypertrophy.6 7 8 12 13
Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis
The frequency of infective endocarditis in the overall study
population was assessed in terms of either evidence of prior
endocarditis at the first 2-dimensional
echocardiographic evaluation or occurrence of acute
endocarditis during follow-up.
Prior endocarditis was diagnosed by 2-dimensional
echocardiography as the presence of a mass that met
all the following criteria: (1) was attached to an endocardial surface;
(2) was visualized consistently throughout the cardiac cycle
and in multiple views; (3) showed motion independent of that of the
cardiac structures and/or echo-reflectivity distinct from that of the
valve or endocardium14 15 (Figure
). All the
echocardiograms of the patients suspected of having vegetations were
evaluated independently by 2 observers. In case of discordant
interpretations, the echocardiogram was evaluated by a third observer
and an agreement was reached regarding the final diagnosis.
|
Acute endocarditis was diagnosed on the basis of (1) 2 or more positive blood cultures in the presence of clinical features suggestive of endocarditis; or (2) bacteriologic evidence of active infection on valvular vegetations or embolic material obtained at surgery or necropsy.
Echocardiographic Evaluation of Left
Ventricular Morphology and Function
Two-dimensional echocardiographic images were
obtained in the parasternal long- and short-axis views and apical views
with the use of standard transducer positions. Magnitude of left
ventricular hypertrophy was assessed at
end-diastole by use of criteria previously described and
briefly summarized below.16 17 Left
ventricular wall thickness was assessed primarily from the
parasternal short-axis planes; the parasternal long axis and apical
views were also used to integrate the observations obtained from the
short-axis views. In the parasternal short-axis plane, the left
ventricle was divided into 4 segments that identified the anterior and
posterior portions of the ventricular septum and the
lateral and posterior left ventricular free walls. Wall
thickness was measured at the levels of both the mitral valve and the
papillary muscles in each of the 4 ventricular segments.
The segment of the wall with the greatest thickness was considered to
represent the maximal left ventricular wall
thickness.17 Left ventricular
end-diastolic cavity dimension and left atrial size were
assessed from the M-mode echocardiogram following the recommendations
of the American Society of
Echocardiography.18
Presence of dynamic obstruction to left ventricular outflow
under basal conditions was assessed by Doppler
echocardiography in 793 patients and by M-mode
echocardiography in the remaining 17 patients.
Outflow obstruction was considered present when a maximal
Doppler gradient
30 mm Hg and/or prolonged mitral-septal
contact during systole on the M-mode echocardiographic
tracing were identified.19 20 21
Statistical Methods
Data were expressed as mean±SD or median. Prevalence of
infective endocarditis was estimated as the ratio between patients with
a diagnosis of prior endocarditis at the initial 2-dimensional
echocardiographic evaluation and total number of study
patients. Incidence of infective endocarditis was estimated as the
number of patients who developed infective endocarditis during
follow-up divided by the total number of person-years of observation
accumulated during follow-up in the study population (or in each
patient subgroup). Incidence of infective endocarditis in different
patient subgroups was compared by use of the Fisher exact test. All
tests were 2-tailed. The 95% confidence limits of rates were
calculated using the Poisson distribution. Follow-up times were
calculated from the date of the first patient evaluation at 1 of the 6
participating institutions to the time of the most recent evaluation or
to the time of diagnosis of infective endocarditis, whichever was
first.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The remaining 808 study patients ranged in age from 1 to 89 years, mean 43; 520 (64%) were male. Of these patients, 738 (91%) were asymptomatic or had only mild symptoms (New York Heart Association functional class I or II) and 70 (9%) had severe symptoms (functional class III or IV); 262 patients (32%) had left ventricular outflow obstruction under basal conditions.
Prevalence of Infective Endocarditis
At the first 2-dimensional echocardiographic
evaluation, features consistent with the diagnosis of prior
endocarditis were identified in 3 of 808 patients. Therefore,
prevalence of prior endocarditis was 3.7 per 1000 patients (95% CI
0.8 to 11).
Incidence of Acute Infective Endocarditis
The 3 patients with evidence of prior endocarditis at the first
2-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation were
excluded from the analysis of the incidence of this
complication. Of the remaining 805 study patients without evidence of
prior endocarditis, 681 (85%) were subsequently followed at the
participating institutions. The period of follow-up ranged from 1 to
320 months (mean 55, median 46 months). At the initial evaluation,
these 681 patients ranged in age from 1 to 88 years, mean 42; 438
(64%) were male. Of these patients, 620 (91%) were
asymptomatic or had only mild symptoms (New York Heart
Association functional class I or II) and 61 (9%) had severe symptoms
(functional class III or IV); 224 of the 681 patients (33%) had left
ventricular outflow obstruction under basal conditions.
During follow-up, 5 patients developed acute infective endocarditis.
Therefore the incidence of endocarditis was 1.4 per 1000 person-years
(95% CI 0.5 to 3.2).
Variables Associated With Increased Risk of
Endocarditis
The morphological, functional, and clinical features at initial
evaluation in the 681 study patients who were followed, and the
relation between these features and the risk of developing endocarditis
are reported in Table 2
. In particular,
left ventricular outflow obstruction was present in
each of the 5 patients who developed acute infective endocarditis
during follow-up, and the association between outflow obstruction and
infective endocarditis was statistically significant
(P=0.006). In the 224 patients with outflow obstruction, the
incidence of endocarditis was 3.8 per 1000 person-years (95% CI 1.6 to
8.9) and the cumulative probability of developing endocarditis was
4.3% at 10 years.
|
Left atrial size was also significantly associated with the risk of
developing endocarditis (P=0.007), and 4 of the 5 patients
who developed endocarditis during follow-up had a markedly dilated left
atrium at initial evaluation (
50 mm). In patients with both
outflow obstruction and marked left atrial dilatation, incidence of
endocarditis increased to 9.2 per 1000 person-years (95% CI 2.5 to
23.5). Other clinical and morphological features, including age, sex,
functional class, left ventricular
end-diastolic cavity dimension, and wall thickness were not
significantly associated with the risk of developing endocarditis
(Table 2
).
Clinical Features of all the 10 Study Patients With
Endocarditis
The morphological, functional, and clinical features of the 2
patients primarily referred for acute endocarditis, the 3 patients with
diagnosis of prior endocarditis at the first 2-dimensional
echocardiographic evaluation, and the 5 patients who
developed acute endocarditis during follow-up are summarized in Table 1
. At the time of diagnosis of either prior or acute
endocarditis, age ranged from 16 to 62 years, mean 39. Left
ventricular outflow obstruction under basal conditions was
present in each of the 10 patients. The left atrium was markedly
dilated (
50 mm) in 7 of the 10 patients. Vegetations were
localized on the mitral valve in 7 patients and on both the mitral and
aortic valves in 3.
One of these 10 patients was a heroin addict. None had ever received antibiotic prophylaxis for endocarditis. Within the 3 months before the infection, 4 of the patients with acute infective endocarditis had undergone dental or other procedures considered to be a likely cause of endocarditis.
Clinical Course of the 10 Study Patients With Infective
Endocarditis
After identification of either prior or acute endocarditis, the 10
patients were followed for a period of 20 to 213 months (mean 88).
Severe symptoms of heart failure (functional class III or IV) developed
at the time of acute endocarditis in 5 patients; 2 of these 5 patients
underwent both mitral and aortic valve replacement, 1 underwent mitral
valve replacement, 1 mitral valvuloplasty with associated septal
myotomy-myectomy, and 1 showed gradual clinical improvement to
functional class II on medical treatment. The patient who was a heroin
addict had only mild symptoms of heart failure (functional class II)
after the first episode of endocarditis but experienced a second
episode of endocarditis that led to acute heart failure and death; at
necropsy, large vegetations on the mitral valve and a perforated
anterior mitral leaflet were found.
With regard to the clinical sequelae of endocarditis, systemic embolic events occurred in 1 of the 10 patients at the time of acute endocarditis. A second patient had an embolic event 5 years after the echocardiographic diagnosis of prior endocarditis. At the time of the embolic event, this patient was in normal sinus rhythm but had a markedly dilated left atrium (56 mm). Therefore, the embolus may not have originated from the valvular vegetations but from the left atrium.
At the most recent evaluation, 8 of the 9 surviving patients were asymptomatic or had mild symptoms (New York Heart Association functional class I or II), and 1 had severe symptoms (functional class III). This latter patient showed only moderate mitral valve incompetence but had evolved toward end-stage disease with left ventricular wall thinning, cavity dilatation, systolic dysfunction, and loss of dynamic outflow obstruction. Therefore, in this patient, the severity of symptoms was primarily due to the progression of the disease rather than the previous episode of endocarditis.
Review of the Literature
In view of our finding that each of the 10 study patients with
endocarditis had left ventricular outflow obstruction, we
also verified the frequency of outflow obstruction in the 33 HCM
patients with infective endocarditis reported in the English language
literature during the last 20 years3 4 5 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ; each had
outflow obstruction under basal conditions.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, we have assessed the occurrence of infective endocarditis in a large HCM population of >800 patients, and we have determined the morphological, functional, and clinical features of HCM associated with an increased risk of developing this complication. Antibiotic prophylaxis was not routinely recommended in the patients included in the present investigation because of the widespread perception that infective endocarditis is uncommon in this disease. Therefore the occurrence of endocarditis in the study population was virtually free from the potential influence of antibiotic prophylaxis.
Prevalence and Incidence of Infective Endocarditis
At the first 2-dimensional echocardiographic
evaluation, features consistent with a previous episode of
infective endocarditis were identified in 3 patients,
representing a prevalence of 3.7 per 1000 patients.
Incidence of endocarditis was assessed in almost 700 study patients who
were followed at the participating institutions. Acute infective
endocarditis occurred in 5 of these patients, an incidence of 1.4 per
1000 person-years. Two additional patients were primarily referred for
suspected acute endocarditis and the diagnosis was confirmed by
positive blood cultures. In all, either prior or acute endocarditis was
diagnosed in only 10 of more than 800 patients.
Patient Subgroups at Higher Risk for Infective
Endocarditis
Although our observations show that infective endocarditis is an
uncommon complication in the overall HCM population, our
analysis of the clinical features of the 10 study patients with
endocarditis clearly identifies an HCM subgroup at increased risk for
developing this complication. Each of the 10 patients with endocarditis
had left ventricular outflow obstruction under basal
conditions. In the patient subset with the obstructive form of the
disease, the incidence of endocarditis was 3.8 per 1000 person-years
and the likelihood of developing this complication was
4% at 10
years. These findings prompted us to verify the functional profile of
the HCM patients with infective endocarditis previously reported in the
literature. During the last 2 decades, 33 HCM patients with
endocarditis were reported in the English language
literature3 4 5 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ; each had the obstructive form of
the disease. Therefore, on the basis of our findings, as well as our
focused analysis of the literature, HCM patients with left
ventricular outflow obstruction under basal conditions
would appear to be the ones at significant risk for developing
endocarditis and thus the subgroup that requires antibiotic
prophylaxis. This higher risk of endocarditis may be due to damage of
the mitral and aortic valve endocardium caused by the high velocity and
turbulence of blood flow during ejection and by the mitral-septal
contact during systole, as well as by mitral valve
regurgitation, which is often present in patients
with outflow obstruction.
Our results also indicate that patients with the nonobstructive form of HCM, including those with an outflow gradient induced only under provocable conditions, are at negligible risk for endocarditis. Therefore these patients, who represent the great majority of the HCM population,6 7 8 do not require prophylaxis for endocarditis. This latter conclusion is reinforced by the fact that antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated only in cardiac patients known to be at either moderate or high risk for this complication, since the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of infective endocarditis has been demonstrated in animal models but has not been proved in humans.1 2 Patients with HCM and significant mitral valve regurgitation due to intrinsic abnormalities of the valve apparatus, such as prolapse, are candidates for endocarditis prophylaxis also in the absence of left ventricular outflow obstruction.
We also identified a significant correlation between left atrial size and the risk of developing endocarditis. In patients with both left ventricular outflow obstruction and marked left atrial dilatation, incidence of endocarditis increased to 9.2 per 1000 person-years. It is unclear why a markedly dilated left atrium should be associated with a higher risk of endocarditis. A possible explanation is that a dilated left atrial cavity may reflect more severe hemodynamic impairment, with a higher outflow gradient, more important mitral valve regurgitation, and thus, greater damage to the valve endocardium.
Other clinical and morphological variables, including age, sex, functional class, left ventricular end-diastolic cavity dimension, and wall thickness were not significantly associated with the risk of developing endocarditis. A recent dental or other procedure considered to be a potential cause of endocarditis was reported by approximately half of the patients with acute endocarditis. None of these patients was taking antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of the procedure.
Although infective endocarditis remains a potential cause of severe and acute congestive heart failure in HCM, this complication had a relatively benign clinical course in a significant proportion of our patients, with less than half requiring cardiac valve surgery for severe symptoms of heart failure due to valve regurgitation. The only patient who died was an intravenous drug user who had a second and fatal episode of endocarditis. These observations suggest that this complication is not invariably associated with an unfavorable short-term prognosis in HCM. Indeed, the degree of incompetence of the damaged valve, which is the principal determinant of clinical course in endocarditis, is not necessarily severe in all patients. The particularly high morbidity and mortality generally reported for endocarditis in HCM is probably due to the fact that the literature is based on case reports3 4 5 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 and thus is probably skewed toward those patients posing the most challenging clinical problems.
Conclusions
Our results show that infective endocarditis in HCM is virtually
confined to patients with left ventricular outflow
obstruction under basal conditions and that the risk of this
complication is highest in patients with both outflow obstruction and
marked left atrial dilatation. Therefore our observations indicate that
antibiotic prophylaxis for infective endocarditis is required only in
patients with the obstructive form of HCM and particularly in those
with a markedly dilated left atrium.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received August 28, 1998; revision received February 1, 1999; accepted February 1, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Louahabi, A. Drighil, R. Habbal, and L. Azzouzi Infective endocarditis complicating hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Eur J Echocardiogr, December 1, 2006; 7(6): 468 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P M Elliott, J R Gimeno, R Thaman, J Shah, D Ward, S Dickie, M T Tome Esteban, and W J McKenna Historical trends in reported survival rates in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Heart, June 1, 2006; 92(6): 785 - 791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Spirito and C. Autore Management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. BMJ, May 27, 2006; 332(7552): 1251 - 1255. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Autore, P. Bernabo, C. S. Barilla, P. Bruzzi, and P. Spirito The prognostic importance of left ventricular outflow obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy varies in relation to the severity of symptoms J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 5, 2005; 45(7): 1076 - 1080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Maron, W. J. McKenna, G. K. Danielson, L. J. Kappenberger, H. J. Kuhn, C. E. Seidman, P. M. Shah, W. H. Spencer III, P. Spirito, F. J. Ten Cate, et al. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 5, 2003; 42(9): 1687 - 1713. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Writing Committee Members, B. J. Maron, W. J. McKenna, G. K. Danielson, L. J. Kappenberger, H. J. Kuhn, C. E. Seidman, P. M. Shah, W. H. Spencer III, P. Spirito, et al. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2003; 24(21): 1965 - 1991. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Autore, M. R. Conte, M. Piccininno, P. Bernabo, G. Bonfiglio, P. Bruzzi, and P. Spirito Risk associated with pregnancy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 20, 2002; 40(10): 1864 - 1869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G Morgan-Hughes and J Motwani Mitral valve endocarditis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: case report and literature review Heart, June 1, 2002; 87(6): e8 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Maron Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review JAMA, March 13, 2002; 287(10): 1308 - 1320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Maron, I. Olivotto, P. Bellone, M. R. Conte, F. Cecchi, B. P. Flygenring, S. A. Casey, T. E. Gohman, S. Bongioanni, and P. Spirito Clinical profile of stroke in 900 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 16, 2002; 39(2): 301 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Maron, I. Olivotto, P. Spirito, S. A. Casey, P. Bellone, T. E. Gohman, K. J. Graham, D. A. Burton, and F. Cecchi Epidemiology of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy-Related Death : Revisited in a Large Non-Referral-Based Patient Population Circulation, August 22, 2000; 102(8): 858 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Spirito, P. Bellone, K. M. Harris, P. Bernabo, P. Bruzzi, and B. J. Maron Magnitude of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Risk of Sudden Death in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy N. Engl. J. Med., June 15, 2000; 342(24): 1778 - 1785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |