(Circulation. 1999;99:1822-1830.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine (M.Y.) and the First Department of Internal Medicine (M. Inagaki, H.I., R.I., K.N., T.S.), Nagoya University School of Medicine, and Nagoya University School of Health Science (M. Iwase), Nagoya; and the Department of Geriatric Research (Y.Y.), National Institute for Longevity Science, and National Chubu Hospital (M.K.), Obu, Japan.
Correspondence to Mitsuhiro Yokota, MD, Cardiovascular Section, Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8560, Japan. E-mail myokota{at}tsuru.med.nagoya-u.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsWe calculated the maximum first derivative of LV pressure (LV dP/dtmax) and the LV pressure half-time (T1/2) during pacing, exercise, and isoproterenol infusion in 17 patients with hypertensive LVH and 9 control subjects to investigate the influence of increases in heart rate (HR) and adrenergic stimulation on inotropic and lusitropic reserves. Group A consisted of 10 LVH patients who showed a progressive increase in the HR-LV dP/dtmax relation. Group B consisted of 7 LVH patients in whom the HR-dP/dtmax relation at physiological pacing rates was biphasic. The LV mass index was larger and the LV ejection fraction was smaller in group B than in group A (244±72 g/m2 versus 172±22 g/m2 and 55±18% versus 72±6%, respectively; both P<0.05). The increase in LV dP/dtmax was greater during exercise than pacing alone for similar increases in HR in all groups (P<0.05) (group A, 111±22% versus 25±14%; group B, 105±35% versus 14±10%; control, 111±24% versus 25±12%). T1/2 was shorter (P<0.05) during exercise than with pacing alone in all groups (group A, 41±6% versus 11±3%; group B, 38±9% versus 14±4%; control, 44±6% versus 12±5%). Isoproterenol infusion caused similar increases in LV dP/dtmax and similar decreases in T1/2 in all groups.
ConclusionsThe FFR was biphasic in patients with severe LVH irrespective of LV function but was preserved in patients with less severe LVH and control subjects. Importantly, the RFR and adrenergic control of both inotropic and lusitropic reserves were well preserved in all LVH patients. A biphasic FFR at physiological pacing rates may be one of the earliest markers of the transition from physiological adaptation to the pathological process in LVH patients.
Key Words: myocardial contraction hypertrophy hypertension
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Heart rate (HR) is an important determinant of myocardial performance, and several studies have confirmed the existence of chronotropic effects on myocardial contractility (the positive force-frequency relation, FFR) in normal human subjects.5 6 7 In addition, exercise and dobutamine infusion have been found to markedly enhance the positive FFR in normal dogs8 9 and in healthy humans.7 However, the HR-dependent changes in myocardial contractility and relaxation and the effects of adrenergic stimulation, such as dynamic exercise, have not been fully investigated in patients with hypertensive LVH in the presence or absence of depressed LV function. Liu et al10 have shown that the positive contraction response to rapid pacing at physiological rates is markedly diminished in patients with symptomatic LVH. Recently, studies from our laboratory demonstrated that exercise-induced enhancement of the relaxation-frequency relation (RFR) was attenuated in all patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), irrespective of the degree of LVH.7 11 The RFR and adrenergic control of lusitropic reserves are well preserved in patients with compensated hypertensive LVH as well as in normal control subjects.11 Furthermore, the exercise-induced enhancement of FFR was preserved in patients with moderate HCM but was blunted in patients with more severe HCM, even in the absence of LV dysfunction.7 Thus, both FFR and RFR and adrenergic control of both inotropic and lusitropic reserves may be related to the cause, as well as the severity, of LVH.
The goal of the present investigation was to characterize chronotropic and ß-adrenergic regulation of myocardial contraction and relaxation and to investigate a possible physiological marker of the transition from physiological to pathological LVH in patients with essential hypertension. We examined inotropic and lusitropic responsiveness to rapid atrial pacing, dynamic exercise, and isoproterenol infusion in patients with hypertensive LVH in the presence or absence of mildly depressed LV function.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Measurement of LV Mass
M-mode and 2-dimensional echocardiograms at rest were obtained
with a Hewlett-Packard Sonos 2500 system.
Echocardiographic measurements were made from
recordings of at least 10 consecutive cardiac cycles by 2
observers who were unaware of the patients' clinical status. The
interventricular septal thickness, posterior wall
thickness, and LV internal dimension were measured at the peak of the R
wave on the ECG and were determined according to the Penn convention.
The echocardiographic LV mass was calculated according
to the formula developed by Devereux and Reichek.13
Cardiac Catheterization Procedures
Right heart catheterization was performed with a
7F triple-lumen thermistor Swan-Ganz catheter (Baxter Health Care Co).
A 6F fluid-filled pigtail catheter with a high-fidelity
micromanometer (model SPC-464D, Millar Instruments)
was advanced into the LV through the right brachial artery for
measurement of LV pressure. The micromanometer
pressure was matched to the pressure of the fluid-filled lumen. A
20-gauge catheter was placed in the left brachial artery for
measurement of arterial pressure. A 6F bipolar pacing
catheter was introduced through the right subclavian vein and
positioned in the right atrium. After completion of the pacing study,
the isoproterenol study, and the exercise study, selective
coronary angiography and left ventriculography were performed.
Micromanometer pressure signals and bipolar
standard ECG leads were recorded simultaneously and
continuously with a multichannel recorder (MR-40, TEAC Co) during
the study.
Pacing Study
After catheters were in place and baseline
hemodynamic data had been collected, right atrial
pacing was initiated at 80 bpm and increased in increments of 10 bpm.
We defined the critical HR as the HR at which
dP/dtmax reached the maximum value during
progressive increases in HR. Thus, the value beyond which
dP/dtmax declined by 5% was the critical
HR14 for isovolumic contraction. This point occurred in 7
LVH patients at physiological pacing rates. The
peak pacing rate was defined as the HR at which either second-degree
atrioventricular block or pulsus alternans
occurred.
Isoproterenol Study
After the pacing study had been completed, 9 of 17 patients in
the LVH group and 5 of 9 control subjects were selected randomly to
receive continuous isoproterenol infusions (isoprenaline hydrochloride,
Nikken Kagaku). The dose of isoproterenol was gradually increased to
obtain an HR of
130 bpm. The maximal isoproterenol dose was similar
in the two groups (control, 0.018±0.002 µg ·
kg-1 · min-1; LVH,
0.014±0.001 µg · kg-1 ·
min-1).
Exercise Study
Exercise testing was performed with patients in the supine
position on a bicycle ergometer, as described
previously,15 at least 30 minutes after completion of the
pacing study or 1 hour after completion of the isoproterenol infusion
study. The workload was initiated at 25 W for 3 minutes and then
increased by 25 W at 3-minute intervals until the HR reached a level
similar to the peak pacing rate or the appearance of leg fatigue.
Data Analysis
LV pressure signals were digitized at 3-ms intervals and
analyzed with software developed in our laboratory with a
32-bit microcomputer system (PC-9821-ST20, NEC Co). We selected
steady-state LV pressure data at baseline, at each pacing rate, and at
7 to 10 points during exercise and isoproterenol infusion for
analysis. We used the ratio of LV dP/dt to developed LV
pressure at a developed LV pressure of 40 mm Hg [LV
(dP/dt)/DP40] as an index of
contractility.16 To evaluate LV isovolumic
relaxation,
(TD) was calculated in 2 ways. The pressure
half-time (T1/2) was computed directly, according
to the method of Mirsky.17 We also measured
on the
basis of a modification of the method described by Raff and
Glantz.18 The correlation coefficients (r) were
generally between 0.992 and 0.995. LV end-systolic and
end-diastolic volumes were determined by biplane
ventriculography and calculated by the area-length
method.19 Wall stress was calculated by the equation
wall stress
(g/cm2)=PD2/4WT(D+WT),
where P is LV peak systolic pressure, D is LV diameter measured
by echocardiography, and WT is LV wall
thickness.20
Plasma Concentrations of Catecholamines
Blood samples (5 mL) were collected from the brachial artery at
rest and at peak HR during pacing, isoproterenol infusion, and/or
exercise. The plasma levels of catecholamines were
analyzed by high-performance liquid
chromatography.7
Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as mean±SD. One-way factorial ANOVA was
used to compare baseline characteristics and
hemodynamic variables at peak HR during pacing,
exercise, and isoproterenol infusion among groups. Within-group
comparisons were performed for the hemodynamic changes
during pacing, exercise, and isoproterenol infusion by 2-way
repeated-measures ANOVA. When a significant difference was present,
intergroup comparisons were made by Scheffé's multiple
comparison test. The FFR and RFR were assessed by the nonlinear
least-squares fitting technique, as appropriate. Between-group
comparisons of the regression curves were determined by ANCOVA, with
individual differences analyzed by Scheffé's multiple
comparison test. A value of P<0.05 was considered
statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Subgroup Classification
We divided the LVH patients into 2 groups on the basis of the
analysis of FFRs during pacing. Group A consisted of 10
patients in whom LV dP/dtmax increased
progressively with increases in HR up to the peak pacing rate (the
positive FFR). Group B consisted of 7 patients in whom FFRs at
physiological pacing rates were biphasic, with an
initial positive slope (ascending limb) and a subsequent negative slope
(descending limb).
Baseline Data
The LV mass index was increased in both groups A and B, but the
increase was greater in group B. The LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was
significantly greater in group A and in the control group than in group
B. All 4 patients whose LVEF was
50% belonged to group B. LV peak
systolic pressure at baseline was significantly higher in
groups A and B than in the control group. LV end-diastolic
pressure (LVEDP) at baseline was significantly higher in group B than
in group A and in the control group. There was no difference in LV
dP/dtmax or LV (dP/dt)/DP40
at baseline among groups, but T1/2 and
TD were significantly prolonged in groups
A and B compared with the control group. LV peak systolic wall
stress was 47.1±11.3 g/m2 in the control group,
49.5±11.7 g/m2 in 13 LVH patients with normal
LVEF, and 118.5±41.6 g/m2 in 4 LVH patients with
impaired LVEF (
50%).
Responses to Pacing-Induced Tachycardia
There was no difference in peak pacing rate among groups.
Increases in the pacing rate induced progressive increases in LV
dP/dtmax in group A and in the control group
(Figure 2
). HR was significantly
correlated with LV dP/dtmax in group A
(r=0.93±0.13) and in the control group
(r=0.95±0.11). The slope of the regression curve for the
HRLV dP/dtmax relation was similar in the two
groups. Patients in group A and control subjects showed a similar
increase in LV dP/dtmax at the peak pacing rate.
The HRLV dP/dtmax relation was biphasic in
group B (Figure 3
). The critical HR
ranged from 100 to 130 bpm (mean, 114±10 bpm). At the critical HR, LV
dP/dtmax increased significantly, by 24%, and
then decreased by 10% at the peak pacing rate. HR was significantly
correlated with T1/2 (r=-0.94±0.13)
during pacing in all groups (Figure 2
). The slope of the
regression curve for the HR-T1/2 relation was
similar in all groups. The pacing-induced increase in HR to
130 bpm
reduced T1/2 in all groups. LVEDP at the peak
pacing rate decreased in all groups.
|
|
Responses to Dynamic Exercise
Exercise increased LV dP/dtmax and reduced
T1/2 in all groups. In group B, exercise
abolished the biphasic FFR. HR was significantly correlated with LV
dP/dtmax (r=0.94±0.18) and
T1/2 (r=-0.91±0.24) during exercise
in all subjects (Figure 2
). The slopes of the regression curve
for the HRLV dP/dtmax relation were steeper
during exercise than during atrial pacing in group A and the control
group (P<0.05, ANCOVA), and for the
HR-T1/2 relation they were steeper during
exercise than during atrial pacing in all groups (P<0.05,
ANCOVA). Exercise-induced changes in LVEDP were greater in groups A and
B than in the control group (P<0.05).
Responses to Isoproterenol Infusion
Isoproterenol infusion induced increases in HR similar to those
observed during exercise in all groups. Isoproterenol infusion
abolished the biphasic FFR in group B, significantly increased LV
dP/dtmax, and reduced LVEDP, LV peak
systolic pressure, and T1/2 in all
groups. Isoproterenol-induced changes in LV
dP/dtmax and T1/2 were
similar in all groups.
Changes in Plasma Levels of Catecholamines
Exercise increased the plasma level of norepinephrine
in all groups, but there were no significant differences among groups
in the plasma level of norepinephrine at rest (control,
230±73 pg/mL; group A, 235±91 pg/mL; group B, 235±128 pg/mL), at
peak pacing (control, 221±91 pg/mL; group A, 237±125 pg/mL; group B,
253±146 pg/mL), or at peak exercise (control, 625±149 pg/mL; group A,
805±380 pg/mL; group B, 881±423 pg/mL). The plasma level of
epinephrine was also similar in all groups.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present study presents a novel finding regarding the FFR at physiological pacing rates in patients with hypertensive LVH. The FFR was biphasic, with an initial positive slope (ascending limb) and a subsequent negative slope (descending limb), in patients with severe LVH in the presence or absence of mildly depressed LV function. However, the FFR was preserved during rapid pacing in patients with less severe LVH in the absence of depressed LV function, as well as in control subjects. Furthermore, the RFR was preserved at physiological pacing rates in all patients with LVH, irrespective of the presence of the biphasic FFR, as well as in control subjects. Importantly, adrenergic control of both inotropic and lusitropic reserves was well preserved in all subjects. A biphasic FFR at physiological pacing rates may be one of the earliest markers of the transition from physiological to pathological LVH in patients with hypertension.
Force-Frequency Relationship
HR is an important determinant of cardiac performance. The
present data indicate that HR has a significant positive effect on
myocardial contractility (positive FFR) in normal human
subjects. Incremental pacing produced a significant 25% increase in LV
dP/dtmax at a pacing rate of
130 bpm in normal
human subjects. Because LV dP/dtmax is
preload-dependent and because an increased HR resulted in variable
reduction in LV preload, it is likely that the magnitude of the
force-frequency effect was underestimated in the present
study.9 Khoury et al14 first reported that
the FFR in the sedated adult baboon was biphasic. In this regard,
Freeman et al25 demonstrated that neither LV
dP/dtmax nor the slope of the
end-systolic pressure-volume relation showed a biphasic
response to incremental atrial pacing up to 200 bpm in conscious dogs.
It should be noted that a descending limb of the FFR has never been
described in intact normal humans at physiological
pacing rates.
In the present study, LVH patients were divided into 2 groups on the basis of the differences in the FFR. In patients with more severe LVH or with LVH in the presence of mild LV dysfunction, the FFR was biphasic at physiological pacing rates. The critical HR was between 100 and 130 bpm. To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have observed a descending limb of the FFR at physiological pacing rates in patients with hypertensive LVH. The precise mechanisms involved in such an impaired FFR are not clear. However, it is possible that the descending limb of the FFR is related to altered sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ handling26 or to delayed mechanical restitution because of inadequate time for recovery of the Ca2+ release channel.27 Drake-Holland et al28 demonstrated that mechanical restitution was enhanced by ß-adrenergic stimulation in normal isolated papillary muscles. Furthermore, Ryu et al29 reported that dobutamine infusion corrected the descending limb in rabbits. In the present study, dynamic exercise and isoproterenol infusion corrected the descending limb at physiological HRs in patients with severe LVH. It is unlikely that the descending limb is due to myocardial ischemia, because exercise-induced and isoproterenol-induced increases in myocardial oxygen consumption should have the opposite effect on the critical HR (ie, an earlier onset of the descending limb).
Relaxation-Frequency Relationship
In the present study, the RFR was preserved during atrial
pacing in all patients with LVH, irrespective of the presence or
absence of mild LV dysfunction and even in the presence of impaired
FFR, as well as in control subjects. However, systolic and
diastolic deterioration have been found to occur
simultaneously in many LVH pacing studies.24
Gwathmey et al30 suggested that calcium overload in
isolated hypertrophied muscle strips simultaneously led to
systolic and diastolic dysfunction at rapid pacing
rates. However, Liu et al10 clearly demonstrated that
despite the presence of contractile abnormalities,
diastolic function did not deteriorate further in response
to rapid pacing and thus did not appear to be closely linked to
systolic changes in patients with symptomatic LVH.
Although significant diastolic abnormalities existed at
baseline, pacing caused no further significant decline in
diastolic function. In fact, T1/2,
which was prolonged at rest, shortened progressively and to a similar
degree in LVH patients and in control subjects. Indeed,
simultaneous increases in systolic and
diastolic Ca2+ levels with pacing
were not found in a recent study performed in isolated hypertrophied
myocytes.31
Adrenergic Control
LV dP/dtmax and T1/2
were enhanced during exercise-induced and isoproterenol-induced
tachycardia in both control subjects and LVH patients in
the present study. Even in LVH patients with impaired FFRs,
adrenergic control of both inotropic and lusitropic reserves was well
preserved. During exercise, LVEDP showed a significantly greater
increase in LVH groups than in the control group. LV
dP/dtmax is sensitive to LV
preload.16 Therefore, it is possible that the
exercise-induced increase in LV dP/dtmax was
preserved in patients with LVH because of an increase in LVEDP.
Isoproterenol infusion also increased LV dP/dtmax
in association with similar increases in HR during exercise in the LVH
group and in the control group, whereas LVEDP decreased similarly in
both groups. These observations suggest that ß-adrenergic stimulation
enhanced LV dP/dtmax independently of LV preload
in both groups. In addition, LV peak systolic pressure at peak
exercise increased similarly in both groups. This increase may have
affected LV relaxation.32 However, tachycardia
induced by rapid atrial pacing and isoproterenol infusion shortened
T1/2 in association with a similar fall in LV
peak systolic pressure. These results suggest that enhancement
of LV relaxation during exercise is due to an improvement in myocardial
relaxation properties.
The present findings are supported by several previous studies.33 34 Vatner et al34 reported that the in vivo response to isoproterenol and in vitro isoproterenol-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity were normal in dogs with severe but compensated LVH induced by aortic banding. In contrast to the present results, several previous reports regarding pressure-overload LVH have suggested that ß-adrenergic LV contractile responsiveness is impaired in the presence of hypertension.35 36 Most previous studies were conducted in rats in different models of hypertension. Accordingly, the discordance between prior studies and the present study may be due to species differences or methodological differences. The present study is the first to demonstrate that adrenergic control of the FFR and RFR is preserved in patients with hypertensive LVH in the presence or absence of mildly depressed LV function.
Conclusions
The FFR was biphasic, with an initial positive slope and a
subsequent negative slope, at physiological pacing
rates in patients with severe LVH in the presence or absence of mild LV
dysfunction. A biphasic FFR at physiological pacing
rates may be one of the earliest markers of the transition from
physiological adaptation to a pathological process
in patients with hypertensive LVH. Importantly, the RFR and adrenergic
control of both inotropic and lusitropic reserves were well preserved
in this disease state.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received June 18, 1998; revision received December 30, 1998; accepted January 11, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Feldman AM, Weinberg EO, Ray PE, Lorell BH. Selective changes in cardiac gene expression during compensated hypertrophy and the transition to cardiac decompensation in rats with chronic aortic banding. Circ Res. 1993;73:184192.[Abstract]
3. Ross J Jr, Braunwald E. Aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1968;38(suppl V):V-61V-67.
4.
Carabello BA, Green LH, Grossman W, Cohn LH, Koster
JK, Collins JJ. Hemodynamic determinants of
prognosis of aortic valve replacement in critical aortic
stenosis and advanced congestive heart failure.
Circulation. 1980;62:4248.
5. Glick G, Sonnenblick EH, Braunwald E. Myocardial force-velocity relations studied in intact unanesthetized man. J Clin Invest. 1965;44:978988.
6. Feldmann MD, Alderman JD, Aroesty JM, Royal HD, Ferguson JJ, Owen RM, Grossman W, Mckay RG. Depression of systolic and diastolic myocardial reserve during atrial pacing tachycardia in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Clin Invest. 1988;82:16611669.
7.
Izawa H, Yokota M, Takeichi Y, Inagaki M, Nagata K,
Iwase M, Sobue T. Adrenergic control of the force-frequency and
relaxation-frequency relations in patients with hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1997;96:29592968.
8.
Miura T, Miyazaki S, Guth BD, Kambayashi M, Ross J Jr.
Influence of the force-frequency relation on left
ventricular function during exercise in conscious dogs.
Circulation. 1992;86:563571.
9.
Kambayashi M, Miura T, Oh B-H, Rockman HA, Murata K,
Ross J Jr. Enhancement of the force-frequency effect on myocardial
contractility by adrenergic stimulation in conscious
dogs. Circulation. 1992;86:572580.
10.
Liu CP, Ting CT, Lawrence W, Maughan WL, Chang MS, Kass
DA. Diminished contractile response to increased heart rate in intact
human left ventricular hypertrophy:
systolic versus diastolic determinants.
Circulation. 1993;88:18931906.
11. Izawa H, Yokota M, Nagata K, Iwase M, Sobue T. Impaired response of left ventricular relaxation to exercise-induced adrenergic stimulation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:17381745.[Abstract]
12. Kannel WB, Gordon T, Castelli WP, Margolis JR. Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy and risk of coronary heart disease: the Framingham Study. Ann Intern Med. 1970;72:813822.
13.
Devereux RB, Reichek N.
Echocardiographic determination of left
ventricular mass in man: anatomic validation of the method.
Circulation. 1977;55:613618.
14.
Khoury SF, Hoit BD, Dave V, Pawloski-Dahm CM, Shao Y,
Gabel M, Periasamy M, Walsh RA. Effects of thyroid hormone on left
ventricular performance and regulation of
contractile and Ca2+-cycling proteins in the
baboon: implications for the force-frequency and relaxation-frequency
relationships. Circ Res. 1996;79:727735.
15.
Yokota M, Miyahara T, Iwase M, Watanabe M, Matsunami T,
Kamihara S, Koide M, Saito H, Takeuchi J.
Hemodynamic mechanism of antianginal action of calcium
channel blocker nisoldipine in dynamic exercise-induced angina.
Circulation. 1990;81:18871898.
16. Mahler F, Ross J Jr, O'Rourke RA, Covell JW. Effects of changes in preload, afterload and inotropic state on ejection and isovolumic phase measures of contractility in the conscious dog. Am J Cardiol. 1975;35:626634.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Mirsky I. Assessment of diastolic function:
suggested methods and future considerations. Circulation. 1984;69:836841.
18.
Raff GL, Glantz SA. Volume loading slows left
ventricular isovolumic relaxation rate: evidence of
load-dependent relaxation in the intact dog heart. Circ Res. 1981;48:813824.
19. Dodge HT, Sandler H, Baxley WA, Hawley RR. Usefulness and limitations of radiographic methods for determining left ventricular volume. Am J Cardiol. 1966;18:1024.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Takahashi M, Sasayama S, Kawai C, Kotoura H.
Contractile performance of the hypertrophied ventricle in
patients with systemic hypertension. Circulation. 1980;62:116126.
21. Grossman W, Jones D, McLaurin LP. Wall stress and patterns of hypertrophy in the human left ventricle. J Clin Invest. 1975;56:5664.
22.
Sasayama S, Ross J Jr, Franklin D, Bloor CM, Bishop S,
Dilley RB. Adaptations of the left ventricle to chronic pressure
overload. Circ Res. 1976;38:172178.
23.
Spann JF Jr, Buccino RA, Sonnenblick EH, Braunwald E.
Contractile state of cardiac muscle obtained from cats with
experimentally produced ventricular hypertrophy
and heart failure. Circ Res. 1967;21:341354.
24.
Fujii AM, Gelpi RJ, Mirsky I, Vatner SF.
Systolic and diastolic dysfunction during atrial
pacing in conscious dogs with left ventricular
hypertrophy. Circ Res. 1988;62:462470.
25.
Freeman GL, Little WC, O'Rourke RA. Influence of heart
rate on left ventricular performance in conscious
dogs. Circ Res. 1987;61:455464.
26. Morgan JP. Abnormal intracellular modulation of calcium as a major cause of cardiac contractile dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:625632.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Fabiato A. Time and calcium dependence of
activation and inactivation of calcium-induced release of calcium from
the sarcoplasmic reticulum of a skinned canine cardiac Purkinje cell.
J Gen Physiol. 1985;85:247290.
28.
Drake-Holland AJ, Sitsapesan R, Herbaczynska-Cedro K,
Seed WA, Noble MIM. Effect of adrenaline on cardiac force-interval
relationship. Cardiovasc Res. 1992;26:496501.
29. Ryu K-H, Tanaka N, Dalton N, Mao L, Rockman HA, Milano CA, Ross J Jr. Force-frequency relations in the failing rabbit heart and responses to adrenergic stimulation. J Cardiac Failure. 1997;3:2739.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Gwathmey JK, Warren SE, Briggs GM, Copelas L, Feldman MD, Phillips PJ, Callahan M Jr, Schoen FJ, Grossman W, Morgan JP. Diastolic dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Clin Invest. 1991;87:10231031.
31. Siri FM, Krueger J, Nordin C, Ming Z, Aronson RS. Depressed intracellular calcium transients and contraction in myocytes from hypertrophied and failing guinea pig hearts. Am J Physiol. 1991;261(Heart Circ Physiol 30):H514H530.
32.
Brutsaert DL, Rademakers FE, Sys SU. Triple control of
relaxation: implications in cardiac disease. Circulation. 1984;69:190196.
33. Broughton A, Korner PI. Basal and maximal inotropic state in renal hypertensive dogs with cardiac hypertrophy. Am J Physiol. 1983;245(Heart Circ Physiol 14):H33H41.
34. Vatner DE, Homcy CJ, Sit SP, Manders WT, Vatner SF. Effects of pressure overload, left ventricular hypertrophy on ß-adrenergic receptors, and responsiveness to catecholamines. J Clin Invest. 1984;73:14731482.
35.
Saragoca M, Tarazi RC. Impaired cardiac contractile
response to isoproterenol in the spontaneously hypertensive rat.
Hypertension. 1981;3:380385.
36.
Ayobe MH, Tarazi RC. Reversal of changes in
myocardial ß-receptors and inotropic responsiveness with
regression of cardiac hypertrophy in renal hypertensive
rats (RHR). Circ Res. 1984;54:125134.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Unno, S. Isobe, H. Izawa, X. W. Cheng, M. Kobayashi, A. Hirashiki, T. Yamada, K. Harada, S. Ohshima, A. Noda, et al. Relation of functional and morphological changes in mitochondria to myocardial contractile and relaxation reserves in asymptomatic to mildly symptomatic patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2009; 30(15): 1853 - 1862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Givertz, C. Andreou, C. H. Conrad, and W. S. Colucci Direct Myocardial Effects of Levosimendan in Humans With Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Alteration of Force-Frequency and Relaxation-Frequency Relationships Circulation, March 13, 2007; 115(10): 1218 - 1224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Senzaki, S. Masutani, H. Ishido, M. Taketazu, T. Kobayashi, N. Sasaki, H. Asano, T. Katogi, S. Kyo, and Y. Yokote Cardiac Rest and Reserve Function in Patients With Fontan Circulation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 20, 2006; 47(12): 2528 - 2535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ohshima, S. Isobe, H. Izawa, M. Nanasato, A. Ando, A. Yamada, K. Yamada, T. S. Kato, K. Obata, A. Noda, et al. Cardiac Sympathetic Dysfunction Correlates With Abnormal Myocardial Contractile Reserve in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Patients J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 6, 2005; 46(11): 2061 - 2068. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G Schmidt, J. Zhai, A. N Carr, M. J Gerst, J. N Lorenz, P. Pollesello, A. Annila, B. D Hoit, and E. G Kranias Structural and functional implications of the phospholamban hinge domain: impaired SR Ca2+ uptake as a primary cause of heart failure Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 2002; 56(2): 248 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. l S. Kim, H. Izawa, T. Sobue, H. Ishihara, F. Somura, T. Nishizawa, K. Nagata, M. Iwase, and M. Yokota Prognostic value of mechanical efficiency in ambulatory patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy in sinus rhythm J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 17, 2002; 39(8): 1264 - 1268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Somura, H. Izawa, M. Iwase, Y. Takeichi, R. Ishiki, T. Nishizawa, A. Noda, K. Nagata, Y. Yamada, and M. Yokota Reduced Myocardial Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Ca2+-ATPase mRNA Expression and Biphasic Force-Frequency Relations in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Circulation, August 7, 2001; 104(6): 658 - 663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Takeichi, M. Yokota, M. Iwase, H. Izawa, T. Nishizawa, R. Ishiki, F. Somura, K. Nagata, S. Isobe, and A. Noda Biphasic changes in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure during dynamic exercise in patients with nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2001; 38(2): 335 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |