(Circulation. 1999;99:1802-1809.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Zentrum Innere Medizin, Abteilung Kardiologie und Pneumologie, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany (B.P., B.B., K.S., L.S.M., G.H.); Preclinical Research, HoffmannLa Roche, Basel, Switzerland (V.B., B.M.L.); and Medizinische Klinik III, Abteilung Kardiologie und Angiologie, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg, Germany (S.S., H.J.).
Correspondence to Priv-Doz Dr Burkert Pieske, MD, Zentrum Innere Medizin, Abteilung Kardiologie und Pneumologie, Georg-August-Universität, Robert-Koch-Str 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsInotropic effects were characterized in isolated muscle strips (1 Hz; 37°C). ET-1 0.0001 to 0.3 µmol/L significantly (P<0.05) increased twitch force by maximally 59±10% in NF and by 36±11% in DCM (P<0.05 versus NF). Preincubation with propranolol 1 µmol/L and prazosin 0.1 µmol/L did not affect the response to ET-1, but the mixed ET receptor antagonist bosentan and the ETA receptor antagonist BQ-123 shifted the concentration-response curves for ET-1 rightward. The ETB receptor agonist sarafotoxin S6c 0.001 to 0.3 µmol/L had no functional effects. The inotropic response to ET-1 was not associated with increased intracellular Ca2+ transients, as assessed in aequorin-loaded muscle strips. ET receptor density (Bmax; radioligand binding) was 62.5±12.5 fmol/mg protein in NF and 122.4±24.3 fmol/mg protein in DCM (P<0.05 versus NF). The increase in Bmax in DCM resulted from an increase in ETA receptors without change in ETB receptors. ET-1 peptide concentration (radioimmunoassay) was higher in DCM than in NF (14 447±2232 versus 4541±1340 pg/mg protein, P<0.05).
ConclusionsET-1 exerts inotropic effects in human myocardium through ETA receptormediated increases in myofibrillar Ca2+ responsiveness. In DCM, functional effects of ET-1 are attenuated, but ETA receptor density and ET-1 peptide concentration are increased, indicating an activated local cardiac ET system and possibly a reduced postreceptor signaling efficiency.
Key Words: endothelin cardiomyopathy contractility receptors Ca2+ handling
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ET plasma levels are elevated in patients with chronic heart failure,11 12 and increased ET-1 levels participate in the maintenance of cardiac contractile function in rats with congestive heart failure.13 Endogenous ET-1 contributes to the maintenance of vascular tone in healthy men14 and to vasoconstriction in severe chronic heart failure.15 16 However, a possible functional role of ET-1 in the human heart remains to be elucidated. Despite controversial reports on the effects of ET-1 in mammalian myocardium, little is known about its direct actions in human myocardium. Qiu et al17 showed a Ca2+-sensitizing effect of ET-1 in myocytes from failing human hearts, and Schömisch-Moravec et al18 demonstrated a slight increase in force in muscle strips from failing hearts. However, both studies investigated only one concentration of ET-1 and made no comparison between nonfailing and failing myocardium. Autoradiographic studies have shown the existence of ET receptors in human atrial and ventricular myocardium but did not address the question of ET receptor regulation in heart failure.19 20 Recently, Pönicke et al21 demonstrated both ETA and ETB receptors in human cardiac tissue by radioligand binding studies. ET-1 peptide has been detected in human myocardium, but no comparison between nonfailing and failing tissue was made.22
Therefore, the goal of the present study was to characterize the inotropic effects of ET-1, the ET receptor subtype involved in this effect, and the subcellular mechanism of action of ET-1 in isolated myocardium from nonfailing and end-stage failing human hearts. Furthermore, possible alterations of ET receptors and ET-1 peptide concentrations in idiopathic dilative cardiomyopathy (DCM) were characterized.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Functional Measurements
Muscle Strip Preparation
Muscle strips were prepared as previously
described,23 mounted in an organ chamber, superfused with
modified Krebs-Ringer solution (37°C; pH 7.4), and attached to a
force transducer (F30; Hugo Sachs Electronics). The solution contained
(in mmol/L) Na+ 152,
K+ 3.6, Cl- 135,
HCO3- 25,
Mg2+ 0.6,
H2PO4-
1.3, SO42- 0.6,
Ca2+ 2.5, and glucose 11.2, and 10 IU/L insulin.
The muscle strips were electrically stimulated by field stimulation and
gradually stretched until maximum isometric twitch tension
(mN/mm2 cross-sectional area) was reached.
Cross-sectional area was determined as the ratio of blotted muscle
weight to length (average for nonfailing, 0.43±0.07
mm2 and for DCM, 0.48±0.05
mm2, P=NS).
Experimental Protocol
After complete mechanical stabilization, cumulative
concentration-response curves for ET-1 0.0001 to 0.3 µmol/L or
the specific ETB receptor agonist sarafotoxin S6c
0.001 to 0.3 µmol/L were established. Additional experiments
were performed after muscle strips had been preincubated for 30 minutes
with prazosin 0.1 µmol/L, propranolol 1
µmol/L, the mixed ET receptor antagonist bosentan 3 and
30 µmol/L, or the specific ETA receptor
antagonist BQ-123 0.03 and 0.3 µmol/L.
Aequorin Measurements
To assess the effects of ET-1 on intracellular
Ca2+ transients, muscle strips were loaded with
the photoprotein aequorin as described previously.23
Briefly, aequorin 1 to 3 µL was macroinjected through a fine-tipped
glass micropipette into the quiescent muscle. Changes in aequorin light
emission, reflecting changes in intracellular
Ca2+ transients, were detected by a
photomultiplier (XP 2802, Philipps). Light emission (mV photomultiplier
output) and isometric force (mN) were recorded
simultaneously on an oscilloscope with signal-averaging
function (Nicolet PRO 10C, Nicolet Instrument Corp) and on a chart
recorder (WR 3310, Graphtec). After complete stabilization of
aequorin light and force signals, cumulative concentration-response
curves for ET-1 0.0001 to 0.3 µmol/L or extracellular
Ca2+
([Ca2+]o) 1.25 to 4
mmol/L were performed in nonfailing and end-stage failing
myocardium.
Radioligand Binding
Membrane Preparation
Microsomal membrane preparations and radioligand
binding studies were performed as described in detail
elsewhere.24 Briefly, myocardial tissue was
homogenized by use of a Polytron
homogenizer PT-K (Brinkman Instruments) for 2 minutes
in ice-cold buffer of the following composition (in mmol/L):
Tris/HCl 5, MgCl2 1, and sucrose 250; pH 6.4.
After repeated centrifugation and
rehomogenization steps, the resulting microsomal
membrane homogenate was suspended in 1 mL incubation buffer
(Tris/HCl 75 mmol/L, MnCl2 25 mmol/L,
sucrose 250 mmol/L, chymostatin 2 mg/L, leupeptin 4 mg/L,
bacitracin 40 mg/L, pH 7.4), divided into aliquots, and stored at
80°C.
Competitive Radioligand Binding
Incubation suspensions were prepared by addition of 100 µL of
microsomal membrane homogenates (final protein
concentration, 200 µg/mL), 50 µL of radioactive
125I-labeled ET-1, and 100 µL of the
competitive cold ligand ET-1, ET-3, or BQ-123 at increasing
concentrations. The concentration of 125I-labeled
ET-1 was 32 pmol/L, equivalent to
30 000 cpm. For displacement of
the iodinated ligand, ET-1 was added in 15 different
concentrations, ranging from 10-13 to
10-6 mol/L. To assess the relative amount of
ETA and ETB receptors,
displacement experiments were performed with increasing concentrations
of ET-3 (showing a relative selectivity for the
ETB receptor) and the selective
ETA receptor antagonist BQ-123. All
experiments were performed in triplicate and started by adding the
membrane homogenate, followed by 180 minutes of incubation
at 25°C. Incubation was terminated by filtration of the suspension
through a Whatman GF/C glass filter. Filters were washed, and
membrane-bound radioactivity remaining in the filter was measured by
scintillation gamma counter. Specific binding was determined by
subtracting nonspecific binding, as assessed with ET-1 0.1
µmol/L, from total binding. The individual binding experiments were
analyzed for receptor distribution, receptor density
(Bmax), and ligand affinity
(KD) by use of the LIGAND program.
Endothelin-1 Peptide Expression
ET-1 peptide concentration in tissue homogenates was
measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) as described by Löffler and
Maire.25 Frozen tissue samples were thawed on ice and
homogenized in a 10-fold wet weight volume of 0.9% NaCl
solution and kept at 0°C to 4°C. Aliquots of 100 and 200 µL were
mixed with 1 mL methanol. Precipitated protein was sedimented at
3000g for 10 minutes. The methanol/water phase was
evaporated to dryness and redissolved in RIA buffer, and ET-1 was
determined as described.25 ET extraction efficacy, as
measured by spiking of homogenates with ET-1 10 to 100 pg,
was determined to be >90%.
Materials
ET-1 (porcine/human; Sigma Chemical Co) was dissolved in
deionized water in a concentration of 10 µmol/L and stored at
-80°C until use. BQ-123, sarafotoxin S6c, and isoproterenol
hydrochloride were also obtained from Sigma. Bosentan was obtained from
HoffmannLa Roche.
Statistical Analysis
Average values are given as mean±SEM. Comparison within one
group of myocardium was performed by use of paired
t test and Bonferroni-Holms equation. Comparisons between
different groups were performed by ANOVA followed by
Student-Newman-Keuls test. For analysis of binding data, the
average from triplicate experiments under each condition was used.
Differences were considered significant at P<0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The concentration-dependent inotropic response to ET-1 is shown in
Figure 2
. In nonfailing
myocardium, the effect started at a concentration of
0.001 µmol/L and was maximal at 0.1 µmol/L ET-1. At that
concentration, force had increased by 5.3±1.2
mN/mm2, or 52±11% (P<0.05; n=10).
In DCM, the effect of ET-1 was likewise maximal at 0.1 µmol/L.
However, ET-1 increased force only by 3.0±0.5
mN/mm2, or 36±11% (P<0.05 versus
baseline; n=14). At concentrations >0.01 µmol/L, the positive
inotropic effect was significantly more pronounced in nonfailing than
in failing myocardium. Despite the reduced effectiveness of
ET-1 in failing myocardium, its potency remained unchanged:
the EC50 was 4.28 nmol/L (CI, 1.25 to 14.67
nmol/L) in nonfailing and 3.42 nmol/L (CI, 1.52 to 7.66 nmol/L) in
failing myocardium (P=NS). ET-1 prolonged both
time to peak and relaxation time in a concentration-dependent manner
(Table 1
).
|
|
-Adrenergic receptor blockade with prazosin 0.1 µmol/L and
ß-adrenergic receptor blockade with propranolol 1
µmol/L did not affect the inotropic response to ET-1 in end-stage
failing myocardium (increase in force by 31.7±9.9%; n=8;
P=NS versus data without antagonists, not
shown). In contrast, the mixed ET receptor antagonist
bosentan 3 and 30 µmol/L shifted the concentration-response
curves for ET-1 to the right, and at 30 µmol/L bosentan, the
maximal inotropic response to ET-1 was attenuated at the concentrations
of ET-1 used (Figure 3
, left).
|
To test whether the inotropic effect of ET-1 is mediated via
ETA or ETB receptors,
experiments were performed after selective blocking of
ETA receptors with BQ-123. BQ-123 at 0.03 and
0.3 µmol/L shifted the concentration-response curve for ET-1 to
the right, and with 0.3 µmol/L BQ-123, the maximal inotropic
effect of ET-1 was reduced (Figure 3
, right). Furthermore, the
selective ETB receptor agonist sarafotoxin S6c
0.001 to 0.3 µmol/L did not elicit any inotropic effects in
nonfailing or failing myocardium (Figure 4
), whereas ET-1 at 0.1 µmol/L
applied after sarafotoxin S6c increased force to 181±20% and
139±18%, respectively (P<0.05 versus baseline for both
groups). These data indicate that the functional effects of ET-1 are
mediated exclusively via ETA receptors.
|
Aequorin Experiments
ET-1 increased twitch force with only slight changes in
aequorin light emission. This can be seen from superimposed original
tracings in aequorin-loaded muscle strips from a nonfailing (Figure 5
, left) and a failing heart (Figure 5
, middle). In contrast, a similar increase in twitch force in a
muscle strip from a nonfailing heart after
[Ca2+]o was raised to
4 mmol/L was associated with a substantial increase in aequorin
light emission (Figure 5
, right). Figure 6
shows concentration-response curves for
ET-1 in aequorin-loaded muscle strips from 5 nonfailing (left) and 7
DCM (right) hearts. In nonfailing myocardium, ET-1 resulted
in a pronounced increase in force but only slight increases in aequorin
light emission. In DCM, the maximal inotropic effect of ET-1 was
smaller, and there were only minor changes in aequorin light emission.
In contrast, [Ca2+]o
(1.25 to 4 mmol/L; data related to basal values at
[Ca2+]o=2.5 mmol/L)
concentration-dependently increased twitch force from 69±7% to
154±9% in nonfailing (n=6) and from 60±8% to 153±8% in failing
(n=6) myocardium, with parallel increases in aequorin light
emission (from 68±8% to 138±18% in nonfailing and from 70±8% to
160±13% in failing myocardium, respectively;
P<0.05 versus baseline; data not shown). Time to 50%
decline of the aequorin light transient (baseline versus 0.1
µmol/L ET-1) increased from 64±7 to 76±7 ms (P<0.05) in
nonfailing and from 91±6 to 98±12 ms in failing
myocardium (P=NS). Time to 90% decline
increased from 199±11 to 215±12 ms (P=NS) and from 194±16
to 213±22 ms (P=NS), respectively.
|
|
For comparing the subcellular mechanism of action of ET-1 and
[Ca2+]o, the relation
between the concentration-dependent change in twitch force and aequorin
light emission for both interventions is plotted in Figure 7
for nonfailing myocardium
(according to Reference 2727 ). It becomes obvious that the increase in
force after [Ca2+]o is
raised is associated with a proportional increase in aequorin light
emission, whereas similar changes in force after ET-1 are associated
with only minor increases in aequorin light emission.
|
Radioligand Binding Studies
ET receptors in human myocardium were
characterized by competitive radioligand binding using
125I-labeled ET-1 and unlabeled ET-1, which binds
with similar affinity to ETA and
ETB receptors, ET-3 with
100-fold higher
affinity for the ETB receptor, and the selective
ETA receptor antagonist BQ-123.
Figure 8
shows average values from
displacement experiments for increasing concentrations of ET-1, ET-3,
and BQ-123 in left ventricular myocardial membrane
preparations from 5 nonfailing and 7 DCM hearts. In DCM, compared with
nonfailing myocardium, the remaining
125I-labeled ET-1 binding in the presence of
BQ-123 is significantly decreased, from
40% to 25%. Accordingly,
the upper part of the ET-3 displacement curve is shifted rightward,
indicating a low affinity of the ETB-specific
ligand ET-3. LIGAND analysis of the individual experiments
revealed both ETA and ETB
receptors in human cardiac tissue, and the relative proportion of the
ETA receptor increased from 63±5% in nonfailing
to 73±3% in failing myocardium (Table 2
). This was the result of an increased
absolute number of ETA receptors.
ETA receptor density was 38.1±6.3 fmol/mg
protein in nonfailing and 88.3±17.4 fmol/mg protein in DCM hearts
(P<0.05 versus nonfailing). ETB
receptor density was lower than ETA receptor
density in both types of myocardium and was not altered in
DCM. Total ET receptor density (Bmax) was
62.5±12.5 fmol/mg protein in nonfailing myocardium and
increased to 122.4±24.3 fmol/mg protein in DCM (P<0.05
versus NF) because of the selective upregulation of
ETA receptors. There were no significant
differences in the KD values for ET-1,
ET-3, and BQ-123 between nonfailing and failing myocardium.
Bmax values and binding characteristics of both
ETA and ETB receptors are
summarized in Table 2
.
|
|
Endothelin-1 Peptide Tissue Concentration
ET-1 peptide concentration was measured in left
ventricular homogenates from 5 nonfailing and 5
end-stage failing hearts. ET-1 peptide concentration in nonfailing
myocardium was 4541±1340 pg/mg protein (1.8±0.5 fmol/mg).
ET-1 peptide concentration was significantly increased in DCM to
14 447±2232 pg/mg protein (5.8±0.9 fmol/mg; P<0.05
versus nonfailing).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Functional Effects of ET-1
Direct positive inotropic effects of ET-1 have been
described in rat, rabbit, and ferret3 4 5 6 7 but not in guinea
pig8 or dog6 myocardium.
Recently, a direct inotropic effect of ET-1 has been reported for human
atrial myocardium,26 and a single
concentration of ET-1 showed inotropic responses in muscle
strips18 and isolated myocytes17 from failing
human hearts. Furthermore, ETA and
ETB receptors were demonstrated in human
myocardium, and ETA receptor mRNA was
recently found in human cardiac myocytes.28 However, the
exact characterization of the functional effects of ET-1 in nonfailing
and failing human ventricles and the ET receptor subtype involved in
this effect remained to be determined.
From this study, it is evident that ET-1 exerts a
concentration-dependent inotropic response in nonfailing and failing
myocardium. This effect is comparable to
-adrenergic
receptor stimulation but is only 20% to 30% of the maximal inotropic
effect that can be obtained with ß-adrenergic receptor stimulation in
human cardiac muscle. As assessed by
- and ß-adrenergic receptor
blockade, the inotropic response to ET-1 is independent of activation
of these receptors. In contrast, the mixed ET receptor
antagonist bosentan as well as the selective
ETA receptor antagonist BQ-123
shifted the concentration-response curve for ET-1 to the right. In
contrast, selective ETB receptor stimulation with
sarafotoxin S6c did not elicit any inotropic response. These data
suggest that the inotropic effect of ET-1 is mediated specifically and
exclusively via ETA receptors located on
ventricular myocytes. This is in contrast to the rat heart,
in which ETB receptormediated inotropic effects
of ET-1 have been reported.29
Endothelin Receptor Densities
Elevated ET plasma levels in patients with congestive heart
failure11 12 15 might influence ET receptor regulation. In
contrast to observations in the ß-adrenergic receptor
system,30 but similar to
-adrenergic
receptors,31 the present study shows increased cardiac
ET receptor densities in DCM without changes in the affinity of the
receptors for their ligands. The upregulation of ET receptors was due
to a selective upregulation of ETA receptors with
no change in ETB receptor density.
In animal models of heart failure, both upregulation and downregulation of ET receptors were reported.32 33 ET receptor densities in this study in DCM are similar to results from autoradiographic studies by Molenaar et al19 in 4 failing human hearts. Corresponding to our data, a subtype distribution of 57% ETA and 43% ETB was observed.19 Furthermore, autoradiographic experiments by Bax et al20 in nonfailing human hearts revealed a subtype distribution of 53% ETA and 47% ETB receptors, but these data were not compared with failing myocardium.
In agreement with our binding data, Morawietz and Holtz (Department of Physiology, University of Halle, Germany) observed a significant upregulation of ETA-receptor mRNA in end-stage failing compared with nonfailing human myocardium (personal communication). However, our results seem to be in contrast to receptor binding data by Pönicke et al21 in human cardiac tissue. These authors found a total ET receptor density of 113±27 fmol/mg protein in nonfailing myocardium. Using pooled myocardium from end-stage failing hearts due to both idiopathic dilative and ischemic cardiomyopathy, the authors detected an increase in ET receptor density to 147.5±44 fmol/mg protein, which was not significant. Interestingly, in their study, separate analysis of ET receptors according to pathogenesis of cardiac disease revealed a decline of ET receptors in ischemic (81.9±12 fmol/mg protein; n=5) but a 2-fold increase in dilative cardiomyopathy (213±82 fmol/mg protein; n=5). We also found a decline of ET receptor expression in ischemic cardiomyopathy (43.2±5.7 fmol/mg protein; n=6; unpublished data). Therefore, it seems possible that ET receptor expression is differentially regulated in dilative versus ischemic cardiomyopathy, and pooling of myocardium with both diseases might contribute to the lack of significance for the ET receptor increase in the study by Pönicke et al.21
Because radioligand binding studies in myocardial homogenates do not allow us to discriminate between receptors on myocytes and on nonmyocytes, the possibility cannot be excluded that upregulation of ETA receptors on fibroblasts, smooth muscle cells, or endothelium mask a downregulation on cardiac myocytes. However, ETA receptors are not expressed on human coronary endothelium,34 ET receptor density is lower on fibroblasts than on myocytes,35 and ET receptor number on smooth muscle cells does not exceed ET receptor number on myocytes.36 Therefore, the observed marked upregulation of ETA receptors in DCM hearts most likely results from increased myocyte receptor density.
ET-1 Tissue Concentration
The existence of a local cardiac ET system has been
postulated on the basis of the expression of preproET-1
mRNA37 and peptide,22 but no information
about changes in peptide content in human failing
myocardium is available. ET-1 exerts its local action in a
paracrine and autocrine fashion37 through secretion from
endothelial cells toward their abluminal
borders38 and direct secretion from cardiac
myocytes.10 We detected a 3-fold increase in ET-1 peptide
concentration in DCM, possibly indicating the activation of a local
cardiac ET system. However, from our experiments in myocardial
homogenates, we cannot localize ET-1 peptide overexpression
to either endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, or
cardiac myocytes.
Subcellular Mechanism of Action of ET-1
It was previously reported that ET-1 induces
phosphoinositide breakdown,21 mediating
protein kinase C activation and subsequent stimulation of
Na+-H+
exchange.4 This results in intracellular alkalinization
and sensitization of the myofilaments for Ca2+.
Consistently, we did not detect significant increases in
intracellular Ca2+ after ET-1. Furthermore, we
demonstrated that inhibition of protein kinase C or
Na+/H+ exchange prevented
the inotropic response to ET-1 but not to isoproterenol in human atrial
trabeculae.28
Our findings of an ET-1induced positive inotropic effect with only minor changes in intracellular Ca2+ transients are in agreement with previous reports in animal experiments in ventricular tissue. ET-1 increases contractility but does not change intracellular Ca2+ transients in isolated adult ventricular myocytes from rats4 and rabbits.39 In contrast, using isolated ferret papillary muscle, Wang and Morgan40 demonstrated a slight, albeit significant, increase in [Ca2+]i after ET-1 associated with a 64% increase in twitch force. Furthermore, Qiu et al17 did not observe an increase in Indo-1 fluorescence associated with increased shortening after ET-1 in human myocytes. For human ventricular myocardium, our results suggest increased myofibrillar Ca2+ responsiveness as the major mechanism of action of ET-1. However, we recently found a slight increase in aequorin light emission in human atrial trabeculae,26 but different coupling of endothelin receptors in atrial compared with ventricular myocardium was described.41 Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that small increases in intracellular Ca2+, possibly related to increased transsarcolemmal Ca2+ influx42 or mobilization of Ca2+ from intracellular stores43 contributes to the positive inotropic effect of ET-1 in human ventricular tissue.
Possible Mechanisms Underlying the Reduced Functional Effect of
ET-1 in DCM
The present finding of a reduced inotropic effect
of ET-1 in failing human myocardium is in agreement with a
previous report in a rabbit heart failure model.44
Downregulation of the ETA receptor is unlikely to
contribute to reduced functional effects of ET-1, because we detected
an increased expression and unchanged affinities of the
ETA receptors in DCM. Accordingly, Pönicke
et al21 found unchanged inositol phosphate accumulation
after ET-1 stimulation in failing compared with nonfailing
myocardium. However, Freedman et al45 recently
described a rapid homologous ETA receptor
desensitization by ET-1induced activation of G proteincoupled
receptor kinases and phosphorylation of the receptor.
This process may be of importance in the light of increased ET-1 plasma
levels in heart failure. Furthermore, the effectiveness of ET-1 to
stimulate Na+/H+ exchange
activity was impaired in rat cardiac hypertrophy, resulting
in blunted functional effects of ET-1.46 This might
indicate that alterations in subcellular mechanisms mediating
functional responses of ET-1 could contribute to the reduced inotropic
effect in diseased myocardium. However, few data regarding
such defects were reported for human myocardium.
Furthermore, because binding data in myocardial homogenates
cannot provide final proof for an upregulation of
ETA receptors on cardiomyocytes, the
alterations underlying the reduced effectiveness of ET-1 in DCM deserve
further investigation.
Clinical Relevance of the Endothelin System in Heart
Failure
The relevance of an activated ET system for
maintaining cardiac function has recently been shown for a rat infarct
model of heart failure.13 However, this may not completely
translate into the situation of patients with chronic congestive heart
failure, for several reasons: (1) in addition to its positive inotropic
effects, ET-1 constricts coronary arteries and
peripheral resistance vessels, thereby reducing
coronary blood flow and increasing afterload, which might
impair contractility47 48 ; (2) the
inotropic effect of ET-1 is small and accounts for only 20% to 30% of
the maximal ß-adrenergic receptormediated inotropic effect in
nonfailing and failing myocardium; and (3) short-term
treatment of patients with severe congestive heart failure with the
nonselective ET receptor antagonist bosentan resulted in
favorable acute hemodynamic effects,15 and
long-term treatment with bosentan increased survival in a rat model of
chronic heart failure.49 Therefore, the beneficial effect
of ET-1 on contractile performance in the human heart may be
offset by increased load, reduced coronary blood flow, and
induction of cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling, and
treatment of heart failure patients with ET receptor
antagonists may be beneficial despite the loss of
ET-1related positive inotropy.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received October 23, 1998; revision received December 4, 1998; accepted December 30, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Ito H, Hirata Y, Hiroe M, Tsujino M, Adachi S,
Takamoto T, Nitta M, Taniguchi K, Marumo F. Endothelin-1 induces
hypertrophy with enhanced expression of muscle-specific
genes in cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. Circ
Res. 1991;69:209215.
3. Kelly RA, Eid H, Kramer BK, O'Neill M, Liang BT, Reers M, Smith TW. Endothelin enhances the contractile responsiveness of adult rat ventricular myocytes to calcium by a pertussis toxin-sensitive pathway. J Clin Invest. 1990;86:11641171.
4.
Krämer BK, Smith TW, Kelly RA. Endothelin
and increased contractility in adult rat
ventricular myocytes: role of intracellular alkalosis
induced by activation of the protein kinase Cdependent
Na+/H+ exchanger.
Circ Res. 1991;68:269279.
5.
Li K, Stewart DJ, Rouleau JL. Myocardial
contractile actions of endothelin-1 in rat and rabbit papillary
muscles: role of endocardial endothelium. Circ
Res. 1991;69:301312.
6.
Takanashi M, Endoh M. Characterization of
positive inotropic effect of endothelin on mammalian
ventricular myocardium. Am J
Physiol. 1991;261:H611H619.
7.
Wang JX, Paik G, Morgan JP. Endothelin-1
enhances myofilament Ca2+ responsiveness in
aequorin-loaded ferret myocardium. Circ Res. 1991;69:582589.
8. Volkmann R, Bokvist K, Wennmalm A. Endothelin has no positive inotropic effect in guinea-pig atria or papillary muscle. Acta Physiol Scand. 1990;138:345348.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Evans HG, Lewis MJ, Shah AM. Modulation of myocardial relaxation by basal release of endothelin from endocardial endothelium. Cardiovasc Res. 1994;28:16941699.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Suzuki T, Kumazaki T, Mitsui Y. Endothelin-1 is produced and secreted by neonatal rat cardiac myocytes in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;191:823830.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
McMurray JJ, Ray SG, Abdullah I, Dargie HJ,
Morton JJ. Plasma endothelin in chronic heart failure.
Circulation. 1992;85:13741379.
12.
Wei CM, Lerman A, Rodeheffer RJ, McGregor CG,
Brandt RR, Wright S, Heublein DM, Kao PC, Edwards WD, Burnett JC Jr.
Endothelin in human congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1994;89:15801586.
13.
Sakai S, Miyauchi T, Sakurai T, Kasuya Y, Ihara
M, Yamaguchi I, Goto K, Sugishita Y. Endogenous
endothelin-1 participates in the maintenance of cardiac
function in rats with congestive heart failure: marked increase in
endothelin-1 production in the failing heart.
Circulation. 1996;93:12141222.
14. Haynes WG, Ferro CE, Webb DJ. Physiological role of endothelin in maintenance of vascular tone in humans. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995;26(suppl 3):183185.
15. Kiowski W, Sütsch G, Hunziker P, Müller P, Kim J, Oechslin E, Schmitt R, Jones R, Bertel O. Evidence for endothelin-1-mediated vasoconstriction in severe chronic heart failure. Lancet. 1995;346:732736.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Webb DJ. Evidence for endothelin-1mediated
vasoconstriction in severe chronic heart failure: endothelin antagonism
in heart failure. Circulation. 1995;92:3372.
17. Qiu Z, Wang J, Perreault CL, Meuse AJ, Grossman W, Morgan JP. Effects of endothelin on intracellular Ca2+ and contractility in single ventricular myocytes from the ferret and human. Eur J Pharmacol. 1992;214:293296.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Schömisch-Moravec C, Reynolds E, Stewart R, Bond M. Endothelin is a positive inotropic agent in human and rat heart in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989;159:1418.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Molenaar P, O'Reilly G, Sharkey A, Kuc RE,
Harding DP, Plumpton C, Gresham GA, Davenport AP. Characterization and
localization of endothelin receptor subtypes in the human
atrioventricular conducting system and
myocardium. Circ Res. 1993;72:526538.
20. Bax WA, Bruinvels AT, van Sylen RJ, Saxena PR, Hoyer D. Endothelin receptors in the human coronary artery, ventricle and atrium: a quantitative autoradiographic analysis. Arch Pharmacol. 1993;348:403410.
21.
Pönicke K, Vogelsang M, Heinroth M, Becker
K, Zolk O, Böhm M, Zerkowski HR, Brodde OE. Endothelin receptors
in the failing and nonfailing human heart. Circulation. 1998;97:744751.
22. Plumpton C, Ashby MJ, Kuc RE, O'Reilly G, Davenport AP. Expression of endothelin peptides and mRNA in the human heart. Clin Sci. 1996;90:3746.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Pieske B, Sütterlin M, Schmidt-Schweda S, Minami K, Meyer M, Olschewski M, Holubarsch C, Just H, Hasenfuss G. Diminished post-rest potentiation of contractile force in human dilated cardiomyopathy. J Clin Invest. 1996;98:764776.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Fischli W, Clozel M, Guilly C. Specific receptors for endothelin on membranes from human placenta: characterization and use in a binding assay. Life Sci. 1989;44:14291436.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Löffler BM, Maire JP. Radioimmunological determination of endothelin peptides in human plasma: a methodological approach. Endothelium. 1994;1:273286.
26. Meyer M, Lehnart S, Pieske B, Schlotthauer K, Munk S, Holubarsch C, Just H, Hasenfuss G. Influence of endothelin-1 on human atrial myocardium: myocardial function and subcellular pathways. Basic Res Cardiol. 1996;91:8693.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Blinks JR, Endoh M. Modification of myofibrillar responsiveness to Ca2+ as an inotropic mechanism. Circulation 1986;73(suppl III):III-85III-98.
28.
Hasegawa K, Fujiwara H, Koshiji M, Inada T,
Ohtani S, Doyama K, Tanaka M, Matsumori A, Fujiwara T, Shirakami G,
Hosoda K, Nakao K, Sasayama S. Endothelin-1 and its receptor in
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Hypertension. 1996;27:259264.
29. Beyer ME, Nerz S, Kazmaier S, Hoffmeister HM. Effect of endothelin-1 and its combination with adenosine on myocardial contractility and myocardial energy metabolism in vivo. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1995;27:19891997.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Brodde OE. ß-Adrenoceptors in cardiac disease. Pharmacol Ther. 1993;60:405430.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Vago T, Bevilacqua M, Norbiato G, Baldi G, Chebat
E, Bertora P, Baroldi G, Accinni R. Identification of
1-adrenergic receptors on sarcolemma from
normal subjects and patients with idiopathic dilated
cardiomyopathy: characteristics and linkage to
GTP-binding protein. Circ Res. 1989;64:474481.
32. Löffler BM, Roux S, Kalina B, Clozel M, Clozel JP. Influence of congestive heart failure on endothelin levels and receptors in rabbits. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1993;25:407416.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Miyauchi T, Sakai S, Ihara M, Kasuya Y, Yamaguchi I, Goto K, Sugishita Y. Increased endothelin-1 binding sites in the cardiac membranes in rats with chronic heart failure. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995;26(suppl 1):S448S451.
34. Russell FD, Skepper JN, Davenport AP. Detection of endothelin receptors in human coronary artery vascular smooth muscle cells but not endothelial cells by using electron microscope autoradiography. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1997;29:820826.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Fareh J, Touyz RM, Schiffrin E, Thibault G.
Endothelin-1 and angiotensin receptors in cells from rat
hypertrophied heart: receptor regulation and intracellular
Ca2+ modulation. Circ Res. 1996;78:302311.
36. Dagassan PH, Breu V, Clozel M, Künzli A, Vogt P, Turina M, Kiowski W, Clozel JP. Upregulation of endothelin ETB receptors in atherosclerotic human coronary arteries. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1996;27:147153.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Ito H, Hirata Y, Adachi S, Tanaka M, Tsujino M, Koike A, Nogami A, Murumo F, Hiroe M. Endothelin-1 is an autocrine/paracrine factor in the mechanism of angiotensin II-induced hypertrophy in cultured rat cardiomyocytes. J Clin Invest. 1993;92:398403.
38. Yoshimoto S, Ishizaki Y, Kurihara H, Sasaki T, Yoshizumi M, Yanagisawa M, Yazaki Y, Masaki T, Takakura K, Murota S. Cerebral microvessel endothelium is producing endothelin. Brain Res. 1990;508:283285.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Fujita S, Endoh M. Effects of endothelin-1 on [Ca2+]i-shortening trajectory and Ca2+-sensitivity in rabbit single ventricular cardiomyocytes loaded with indo-1/AM: comparison with the effects of phenylephrine and angiotensin II. J Cardiac Failure. 1996;4S:4557.
40.
Wang J, Morgan JP. Endothelin reverses the
effects of acidosis on the intracellular Ca2+
transients and contractility in ferret
myocardium. Circ Res. 1992;71:631639.
41. Vogelsang M, Boede-Sitz A, Schäfer E, Zerkowski H-R, Brodde O-E. Endothelin ETA-receptors couple to inositol phosphate formation and inhibition of adenylate cyclase in human right atrium. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1994;23:344347.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42.
Lauer MR, Gunn MD, Clusin WT. Endothelin
activates voltage-dependent Ca2+ current
by a G-protein-dependent mechanism in rabbit cardiac myocytes.
J Physiol (Lond). 1992;448:729747.
43. Marsden PA, Danthuluri NR, Brenner BM, Ballermann BJ, Brock TA. Endothelin action on vascular smooth muscle involves inositol triphosphate and calcium mobilisation. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 1989;158:170176.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Kelso EJ, Geraghty RF, McDermott BJ, Trimble ER, Nicholls DP, Silke B. Mechanical effects of ET-1 in cardiomyocytes isolated from normal and heart-failed rabbits. Mol Cell Biochem. 1996;157:149155.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45.
Freedman NJ, Ament AS, Oppermann M, Stoffel RH,
Exum ST, Lefkowitz RJ. Phosphorylation and
desensitization of human endothelin A and B receptors. J
Biol Chem. 1997;272:1773417743.
46. Ito N, Kagaya Y, Weinberg EO, Barry WH, Lorell BH. Endothelin, and angiotensin II stimulation of Na+/H+ exchange is impaired in cardiac hypertrophy. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:125135.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Dagassan PH, Clozel M, Breu V, Clozel JP. Role of endothelin in spontaneous phasic contraction of human coronary arteries. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995;26(suppl 3):S200S203.
48.
Karwatowska-Prokopczuk E, Wennmalm A. Effects of
endothelin on coronary flow, mechanical performance,
oxygen uptake, and formation of purines and on outflow of prostacyclin
in the isolated rabbit heart. Circ Res. 1990;66:4654.
49.
Mulder P, Richard V, Derumeaux G, Hogie M, Henry
JP, Lallemand F, Compagnon P, Mace B, Comoy E, Letac B, Thuillez C.
Role of endogenous endothelin in chronic heart failure:
effect of long-term treatment with an endothelin antagonist
on survival, hemodynamics, and cardiac remodeling.
Circulation. 1997;96:19761982.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. R. Waggoner, K. S. Ginsburg, B. Mitton, K. Haghighi, J. Robbins, D. M. Bers, and E. G. Kranias Phospholamban overexpression in rabbit ventricular myocytes does not alter sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca transport Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2009; 296(3): H698 - H703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Y. Chung, M. Kang, and J. W. Walker Contractile regulation by overexpressed ETA requires intact T tubules in adult rat ventricular myocytes Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): H2391 - H2399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bossuyt, K. Helmstadter, X. Wu, H. Clements-Jewery, R. S. Haworth, M. Avkiran, J. L. Martin, S. M. Pogwizd, and D. M. Bers Ca2+/Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase II{delta} and Protein Kinase D Overexpression Reinforce the Histone Deacetylase 5 Redistribution in Heart Failure Circ. Res., March 28, 2008; 102(6): 695 - 702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Avkiran, A. J. Rowland, F. Cuello, and R. S. Haworth Protein Kinase D in the Cardiovascular System: Emerging Roles in Health and Disease Circ. Res., February 1, 2008; 102(2): 157 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kockskamper, L. Seidlmayer, S. Walther, K. Hellenkamp, L. S. Maier, and B. Pieske Endothelin-1 enhances nuclear Ca2+ transients in atrial myocytes through Ins(1,4,5)P3-dependent Ca2+ release from perinuclear Ca2+ stores J. Cell Sci., January 15, 2008; 121(2): 186 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bien, A. Riad, C. A. Ritter, M. Gratz, F. Olshausen, D. Westermann, M. Grube, T. Krieg, S. Ciecholewski, S. B. Felix, et al. The Endothelin Receptor Blocker Bosentan Inhibits Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiomyopathy Cancer Res., November 1, 2007; 67(21): 10428 - 10435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. K. Birkeland, F. Swift, N. Tovsrud, U. Enger, P. K. Lunde, E. Qvigstad, F. O. Levy, O. M. Sejersted, and I. Sjaastad Serotonin increases L-type Ca2+ current and SR Ca2+ content through 5-HT4 receptors in failing rat ventricular cardiomyocytes Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): H2367 - H2376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Yang and L. A. Barouch Leptin Signaling and Obesity: Cardiovascular Consequences Circ. Res., September 14, 2007; 101(6): 545 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Y. Chung and J. W. Walker Interaction and Inhibitory Cross-Talk between Endothelin and ErbB Receptors in the Adult Heart Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2007; 71(6): 1494 - 1502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Cuello, S. C. Bardswell, R. S. Haworth, X. Yin, S. Lutz, T. Wieland, M. Mayr, J. C. Kentish, and M. Avkiran Protein Kinase D Selectively Targets Cardiac Troponin I and Regulates Myofilament Ca2+ Sensitivity in Ventricular Myocytes Circ. Res., March 30, 2007; 100(6): 864 - 873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Vierimaa, J. Ronkainen, H. Ruskoaho, and O. Vuolteenaho Synergistic activation of salmon cardiac function by endothelin and beta-adrenergic stimulation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2006; 291(3): H1360 - H1370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Qvigstad, I. Sjaastad, T. Brattelid, C. Nunn, F. Swift, J. A. K. Birkeland, K. A. Krobert, G. O. Andersen, O. M. Sejersted, J.-B. Osnes, et al. Dual Serotonergic Regulation of Ventricular Contractile Force Through 5-HT2A and 5-HT4 Receptors Induced in the Acute Failing Heart Circ. Res., August 5, 2005; 97(3): 268 - 276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kruger, J. Graf, D. Kunz, T. Stickel, M. W. Merx, P. Hanrath, and U. Janssens Urotensin II in patients with chronic heart failure Eur J Heart Fail, June 1, 2005; 7(4): 475 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.-P. Xu, M.-S. Chen, Y.-Z. Wang, Q. Yi, S.-B. Lin, A. F. Chen, and J.-D. Luo Leptin Induces Hypertrophy via Endothelin-1-Reactive Oxygen Species Pathway in Cultured Neonatal Rat Cardiomyocytes Circulation, September 7, 2004; 110(10): 1269 - 1275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Parker and J. J. Thiessen Increased endothelin-1 production in patients with chronic heart failure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2004; 286(3): H1141 - H1145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Yang, R. Gros, M. G. Kabir, A. Sadi, A. I. Gotlieb, M. Husain, and D. J. Stewart Conditional Cardiac Overexpression of Endothelin-1 Induces Inflammation and Dilated Cardiomyopathy in Mice Circulation, January 20, 2004; 109(2): 255 - 261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Motte, R. van Beneden, J. Mottet, B. Rondelet, M. Mathieu, X. Havaux, P. Lause, C. Clercx, J.-M. Ketelslegers, R. Naeije, et al. Early activation of cardiac and renal endothelin systems in experimental heart failure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2003; 285(6): H2482 - H2491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Noguchi, Z. Chen, S. P. Bell, L. Nyland, and M. M. LeWinter Endothelin receptor blockade has an oxygen-saving effect in Dahl salt-sensitive rats with heart failure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2003; 285(4): H1428 - H1434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J van der Velden, Z Papp, R Zaremba, N.M Boontje, J.W de Jong, V.J Owen, P.B.J Burton, P Goldmann, K Jaquet, and G.J.M Stienen Increased Ca2+-sensitivity of the contractile apparatus in end-stage human heart failure results from altered phosphorylation of contractile proteins Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2003; 57(1): 37 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Mittmann, C. H. Chung, G. Hoppner, C. Michalek, M. Nose, C. Schuler, A. Schuh, T. Eschenhagen, J. Weil, B. Pieske, et al. Expression of ten RGS proteins in human myocardium: functional characterization of an upregulation of RGS4 in heart failure Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2002; 55(4): 778 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-M. Herrmann, K. Schmidt-Petersen, J. Pfeifer, A. Perrot, N. Bit-Avragim, C. Eichhorn, R. Dietz, R. Kreutz, M. Paul, and K.J. Osterziel A polymorphism in the endothelin-A receptor gene predicts survival in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2001; 22(20): 1948 - 1953. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Aleksic, Z. Szabo, U. Scheffel, H. T. Ravert, W. B. Mathews, L. Kerenyi, P. A. Rauseo, R. E. Gibson, H. D. Burns, and R. F. Dannals In Vivo Labeling of Endothelin Receptors with [11C]L-753,037: Studies in Mice and a Dog J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2001; 42(8): 1274 - 1280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Suzuki and T. Miyauchi A novel pharmacological action of ET-1 to prevent the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin in cardiomyocytes Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2001; 280(5): R1399 - R1406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Duru, M. Barton, T. F. Luscher, and R. Candinas Endothelin and cardiac arrhythmias: do endothelin antagonists have a therapeutic potential as antiarrhythmic drugs? Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2001; 49(2): 272 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Clark Perioperative Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, November 1, 2000; 4(4): 223 - 235. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Luchner, M. Jougasaki, E. Friedrich, D. D. Borgeson, T. L. Stevens, M. M. Redfield, G. A. J. Riegger, and J. C. Burnett Jr. Activation of cardiorenal and pulmonary tissue endothelin-1 in experimental heart failure Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2000; 279(3): R974 - R979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Zolk and M. Bohm The role of the cardiac endothelin system in heart failure Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2000; 15(6): 758 - 760. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. G. N. Serneri, I. Cecioni, S. Vanni, R. Paniccia, B. Bandinelli, A. Vetere, X. Janming, I. Bertolozzi, M. Boddi, G. F. Lisi, et al. Selective Upregulation of Cardiac Endothelin System in Patients With Ischemic but Not Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy : Endothelin-1 System in the Human Failing Heart Circ. Res., March 3, 2000; 86(4): 377 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. MacCarthy, R. Grocott-Mason, B. D. Prendergast, and A. M. Shah Contrasting Inotropic Effects of Endogenous Endothelin in the Normal and Failing Human Heart : Studies With an Intracoronary ETA Receptor Antagonist Circulation, January 18, 2000; 101(2): 142 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Burrell, P. Molenaar, P. J. Dawson, and A. J. Kaumann Contractile and Arrhythmic Effects of Endothelin Receptor Agonists in Human Heart In Vitro: Blockade with SB 209670 J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2000; 292(1): 449 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |