Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1999;99:1580-1586

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez, R.
Right arrow Articles by Macaya, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez, R.
Right arrow Articles by Macaya, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs

(Circulation. 1999;99:1580-1586.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Long-Term Clinical and Echocardiographic Follow-Up After Percutaneous Mitral Valvuloplasty With the Inoue Balloon

Rosa Hernandez, MD; Camino Bañuelos, MD; Fernando Alfonso, MD; Javier Goicolea, MD; Antonio Fernández-Ortiz, MD; Javier Escaned, MD; Luis Azcona, MD; Carlos Almeria, MD; Carlos Macaya, MD

From Unidad de Hemodinámica (R.H., C.B., F.A., J.G., A.F.-O., J.E., L.A., C.M.) and Servicio de Cardiologia (C.A.), Hospital Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

Correspondence to Dr R. Hernandez, Unidad de Hemodinámica, Hospital Universitario San Carlos, C/Prof Martin Lagos s/n, Madrid 28040, Spain.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—The objective of this study was to assess the long-term clinical outcome and valvular changes (area and regurgitation) after percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty (PMV).

Methods and Results—After PMV, 561 patients were followed up for 39 (±23) months and clinical/echocardiographic data obtained yearly. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to estimate event-free survival, its predictors, and the relative risks of several patient subgroups. There were several nonexclusive events: 19 (3.3%) cardiac deaths, 55 (9.8%) mitral replacements, 6 (1%) repeated PMVs, 56 (10%) cases of restenosis, and 108 (19%) cases of clinical impairment. Survival free of major events (cardiac death, mitral surgery, repeat PMV, or functional impairment) was 69% at 7 years, ranging from 88% to 40% in different subgroups of patients. Wilkins score was the best preprocedural predictor of mitral opening, but the procedural result (mitral area and regurgitation) was the only independent predictor of major event-free survival. Mitral area loss, though mild [0.13 (±0.21)cm2], increased with time and was >=0.3 cm2 in 12%, 22%, and 27% of patients at 3, 5, and 7 years, respectively. Regurgitation did not progress in 81% of patients, and when it occurred it was usually by 1 grade.

Conclusions—Seven years after PMV, more than two thirds of patients were in good clinical condition and free of any major event. The procedural result was the main determinant of long-term outcome, although a high score had also negative implications. Mitral area decreased progressively over time, whereas regurgitation did not tend to progress.


Key Words: mitral valve • valvuloplasty • follow-up studies • restenosis • survival


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Since its introduction in 1984 by Inoue,1 percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty (PMV) has emerged as a safe and effective procedure2 3 4 5 6 7 for the treatment of symptomatic mitral stenosis with immediate results that may be comparable to those of surgical commissurotomy. Although some series have provided long-term clinical data,8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 very little information is available concerning longitudinal changes in mitral valve area (MVA) and regurgitation (MR) long after the procedure. The aim of the present study was (1) to describe and analyze long-term clinical results after PMV and (2) to provide new data on longitudinal changes in MVA and MR, not only in patients with a good procedural result but also in those with poor valvular opening or significant regurgitation.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patients
From 1989 to 1995, we performed 620 PMV procedures; in 8 (1.2%) cases no balloon inflation was performed (in 4 because of tamponade), 8 (1.2%) patients required in-hospital mitral surgery, and 3 (0.4%) died. Of the 601 patients discharged after a complete procedure, 40 were lost of follow-up. The remaining 561 (93% of eligible) were indeed followed up for 39 (±23) months (range 6 to 87) and are the subject of this report.

Procedure
PMV was performed with the Inoue balloon. Balloon size was selected according to body surface area (26 mm if <1.5 m2, 28 mm if 1.5 to 1.7 m2, and 30 mm if >1.7 m2), modulated by anatomy (1 to 2 mm smaller in unfavorable cases), and reached after several stepwise inflations. Left ventriculography was performed before and after the last balloon inflation.

Preprocedural and Postprocedural Assessments
Clinical status was determined by New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification. All patients underwent an echo-Doppler study before and 24 hours after PMV. Evaluation included Wilkins scoring,16 MVA calculation (pressure half-time method17 ), and MR estimation (graded as none, mild, moderate, or severe by color-Doppler semiquantitative method).18 With the purpose that MVA and MR would be comparable over time, preprocedure, postprocedure, and follow-up data were analyzed on the basis of echo-Doppler studies. If a >=1 grade discrepancy on MR grading existed between left ventriculography and Doppler, both studies were reviewed, the color-Doppler study (transthoracic and transesophageal) was repeated, and a consensus finally was reached.

Follow-Up
Patients were scheduled for clinical and echocardiographic follow-up in a monographic outpatient clinic. The first visit was 6 months after PMV and yearly thereafter. If a patient failed to keep any programmed visit, he or she or his or her physician were encouraged to come back and/or send clinical/Echo-Doppler reports performed elsewhere.

Definitions
Immediate results were defined as "good opening" when post-PMV Doppler MVA was >=1.5 cm2 and regurgitation moderate or less; "insufficient opening" when MVA <1.5 cm2 and regurgitation moderate or less; and "severe regurgitation" (irrespective of postprocedural area). Clinical improvement after PMV was considered as >=1 NYHA class and class <=2. Follow-up functional impairment was considered as >=1 NYHA class and class >=3. Major cardiac events were cardiac death, surgery, repeat PMV, or functional impairment. Restenosis was defined as loss of >=50% of initial gain and MVA <1.5 cm2. Significant area loss was defined as MVA loss >=0.3 cm2.

Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean (±SD). A value of P<0.05 was considered significant. Discrete data were compared by {chi}2 analysis and continuous data with the Student's 2-tailed t test. The RR for non–time-related variables was determined by simple arithmetic calculations, and the 95% CI was determined on the basis of the normal distribution of the variable. A logistic regression model was adjusted to determine independent predictors of immediate result, and a linear regression model was used to predict MVA loss as a function of time. Event-free survival rate for several single and composite end points was estimated with the use of Kaplan-Meier analysis.19 When death was noncardiac, data on that patient were censored at the time of death. Survival curves for different patient subgroups were compared with the use of the Breslow exact statistic. With the assumption of proportional hazards, the adjusted RR and CI (95%) was calculated from a Cox regression model.20 To identify independent predictors of event-free survival, statistically significant variables in the Cox univariate analysis were selected and 2 models constructed, the first based on baseline variables and the second on preprocedural, intraprocedural, and postprocedural variables. Several subgroups were defined according to these predictors, and Kaplan-Meier curves were estimated in each subgroup. Adjusted RR was calculated from the Cox regression model.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Baseline characteristics and initial results are displayed in Table 1Down. The Inoue balloon diameter was 28.4±2.2 mm, the effective balloon dilation area/body surface area fraction was 3.9±0.2, and patients received a mean of 2.2±1.1 inflations. Global result was summarized as good results in 435 (78%), insufficient opening in 101 (18%), and severe regurgitation in 25 (4%). Patients with good results were younger (50 vs 55 years, P<0.05) and had a lower score (7.3 vs 8.6, P<0.05) than those with insufficient opening. By contrast, patients with severe regurgitation were similar in age (49 vs 50 years, NS) and score (7.4 vs 7.3, NS) than those with good results, but they had an smaller pre-PMV MVA (0.84 vs 1.0 cm2, P<0.05). RR of severe MR in subgroups of patients defined according to baseline MVA and score is shown in Table 2Down.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Baseline, Postprocedural, and Last Follow-Up Clinical and Echocardiographic Data


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Preprocedural Area and Incidence of Severe Mitral Regurgitation

Follow-Up Events
Follow-up events were: (1) Death: 29 patients died, 10 (1.7%) of noncardiac and 19 (3.3%) of cardiac causes (4 after mitral replacement, 1 of prosthetic endocarditis, 3 of persistent severe pulmonary hypertension after successful PMV, and 11 of heart failure; (2)Mitral replacement: 55 (9.8%) patients underwent surgery indicated by poor result in 13, MR in 21, a combination of both in 14, and restenosis in 7; (3) Repeat PMV: 6 procedures in 5 patients; (4)Restenosis: 56 (10%) patients met restenosis definition, but only 30 were in class >=3; (5) Functional impairment occurred in 108 patients; 60 underwent invasive procedures, and 48 did not, 11 because clinical condition was thought to be secondary to severe pulmonary hypertension and 37 because of surgical high risk; 10 of these 48 patients died. Event-free survival curves for several end points are presented in Figure 1Down.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Event-free survival curves for several end points after PMV.

Echocardiographic and Clinical Data During Follow-Up
Echocardiographic and clinical data during follow-up are displayed in Table 1Up.

MVA Loss During Follow-Up
For analysis of MVA loss, only patients with follow-up >=1 year (n=480) were included. Because Doppler MVA determined early after PMV is not accurate enough because of acute changes in left atrial compliance, we considered the Doppler MVA determined at 6 months (when hemodynamic conditions are already stable) as baseline. MVA loss was variable, with a mean of 0.13 (±0.21) cm2, and was remarkably similar in all score subgroups (Table 3Down). It was clearly time related (Figure 2Down) and consequently, the rate of patients with significant MVA loss (>=0.3 cm2) increased from 12% to 22% and 27% at 3, 5, and 7 years, respectively. None of the baseline characteristics were able to predict area loss, being that postprocedural MVA (larger area, larger loss, P=0.020) and follow-up duration (P=0.001) were the only independent predictors.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Mitral Area (in cm2) in 4 Subgroups of Patients Defined by Score



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. MVA loss as a function of time in patients followed up for >1 year (n=480).

MR During Follow-Up
MR did not change significantly during follow-up for the whole population, and if severe, it remained unchanged. When regurgitation was not severe, it increased by 1 grade in 114 (20%) and decreased in 77 (14%), usually from mild to moderate and vice versa. In 14 (3%) patients there was a well-documented >=2 grade increase in MR severity, usually progressive over time; surprisingly, 8 patients had a 2-grade decrease in MR.

Predictors of Event-Free Survival
Several variables (age, sex, cardiac rhythm, previous commissurotomy, score, balloon size, and postprocedural MVA and MR) were tested as potential predictors of event-free survival by continuous univariate Cox analysis, and significant variables were categorized (Table 4Down). On multivariate analysis and considering only baseline variables, score (P=0.0021) was found to have an independent value. When preprocedural, intraprocedural, and postprocedural variables were included in the multivariate analysis, only post-PMV MVA (P=0.0000) and MR (P=0.0000) were independent predictors. Several subgroups of patients were established according to independent predictors (MVA and MR) and the best preprocedural predictor (score) of event-free survival (Figure 3Down). A single cut-off point was established: 1.5 cm2 for MVA and 8 for score. In the case of MR, given that Kaplan-Meier curves for mild and moderate MR tended to converge after 3 years (Figure 4Down), subgroups were none/mild/moderate and severe MR.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Predictors of Event-Free Survival: Univariate Analysis



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier curves for any major event in 5 different subgroups of procedural results.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Kaplan-Meier curves for any major event in patients with none/mild, moderate, and severe MR.

To explore the impact of score in major event-free survival, curves for 4 score ranges were constructed (Figure 5Down). Each score component was also individually analyzed (1 to 2 vs 3 to 4). Kaplan-Meier curves were not different in the case of flexibility and subvalvular components of the score, whereas a high score for thickening (74% vs 68% at 7 years, P=0.020) and calcification (71% vs 54% at 7 years, P=0.001) had a significant impact on event-free survival.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Kaplan-Meier curves for any major event in 4 subgroups of patients defined according to echocardiographic score.

Predictors of Restenosis
Because restenosis was not considered a major event, we estimated the restenosis-free survival rate (Figure 1Up). Potential predictors were tested, but only score (P=0.0002) was found to have an independent value. Since postprocedural MVA was not a predictor of restenosis as a continuous variable, several cut-off points were explored, and an MVA >=1.8 cm2 was found to be a negative predictor of restenosis (P=0.0009) better than score <=8 (P=0.0018).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Our report involves PMV in a population with a majority of middle-age women with pliable valves, although patients with a less favorable profile were also present. This series of Inoue balloon procedures is large and homogeneous, and follow-up was universal regardless of procedural result. The information provided on longitudinal changes in MVA and regurgitation is new and may contribute to our current understanding of post-PMV mitral disease progression.

Immediate Results
Procedural result was summarized as good in 78% of cases, 18% had insufficient opening, and 5.7% (4.5% in these series plus 1.2% who required in-hospital surgery), had severe MR. Clinical improvement was the rule for patients with good results, frequent in those with insufficient opening, and still possible in some with severe regurgitation. As reported by others,3 5 6 7 8 9 10 mitral anatomy was the best predictor of mitral opening, though a good result could also be obtained in cases with high score.

Some increase in regurgitation was frequent, but severe MR was a rather unexpected complication21 22 23 24 of PMV, although Padial et al25 have recently reported that dissimilarities in valve thickening, commissural calcification, and severe subvalvular involvement were associated with a higher risk. We found that a very tight stenosis was also a risk factor, particularly when associated with a low score. Changes in procedural indication (earlier interventions while MVA is still >1.0 cm2) and performance (smaller balloons in patients at high risk) might contribute to a rate reduction of severe MR rate.

Progression of MR
Severe MR after PMV (usually caused by a leaflet tear23 ) persists unchanged during follow-up, and 60% of patients required mitral replacement. When MR was mild or moderate (originated at the split commissure26 ), it did not tend to progress in the population as a whole, although it appeared to increase by 1 grade in 20% and decrease in 14% of patients. We believe that many 1-grade variations in MR severity might be caused by interobserver variability of the method rather than in the regurgitation in itself because 1-grade variations either way were frequently observed. Interestingly, long-term outcome tended to be similar to that of patients with nonsignificant MR Clinical implications of truly stable, moderate regurgitation requires further investigation in long-term studies.

Longitudinal Changes in MVA
Disease progression in rheumatic mitral disease may be the result of low-grade subclinical rheumatic process and/or abnormal turbulences generated by the already deformed valve.27 Both mechanisms might contribute to further commissural fusion, thickening, and calcification of valvular and subvalvular structures both in natural and previously commissurotomized valves. In a study of native mitral valves, Sagie et al27 reported an MVA loss of 0.09 cm2/y and found that patients with aortic insufficiency experienced a more accelerated area loss probably related to the stress caused by the aortic regurgitation jet. In another study, Gordon et al28 reported a similar pace of MVA loss (0.09 cm2/y) that accelerated in valves with a high score. In a post-PMV series, Chen et al12 reported an MVA decrease of 0.2 cm2 at 5 years and Treviño et al10 reported 0.25 cm2 at 3 years. In our series, although scattering was wide, MVA decreased 0.2 cm2 at 7 years (smaller than that reported in untreated valves) and was not influenced by score; nevertheless, because patients with a high score obtained smaller areas, they might have been operated on before a large MVA loss had occurred.

Restenosis is an ambiguous term that includes a mixture of poor result, inaccuracies in MVA determination, very early (within days) area loss, true restenosis, and disease progression. Its definition can be made on a clinical basis or in terms of mitral area, absolute area loss, % of area loss, or loss of gain. With all these confounding factors, it is not surprising that restenosis rate after PMV has ranged from 3% to 70%9 10 at 1 to 3 years, and restenosis definition in itself may play a major role in restenosis rate. When restenosis is defined as a 50% loss of area gain, patients with a poor initial result meet restenosis criteria with only a mild area loss. This fact explains the apparent contradictory finding that patients with a high score had a smaller mitral area loss but a higher restenosis rate that those with a lower score. On the other hand, very early restenosis (within weeks), caused by a mixture of annular and/or valvular recoil and methodological aspects of MVA calculation, should be differentiate from late, true restenosis. Our data support the fact that restenosis is rare within 3 years of the procedure in patients with a good mitral opening, but it increased over time, reaching 39% at 7 years, although not always associated with clinical impairment. Whether restenosis rate at 3 to 10 years after PMV is similar to that reported after surgical commissurotomy remains unclear, but differences in baseline characteristics might justify a different pace of progression in valvular disease.

Event-Free Survival
Patients with good result have a good prognosis. An unsatisfactory late outcome might be due to a mixture of poor result, regurgitation, restenosis, pulmonary hypertension, polyvalvular disease, or left ventricular dysfunction. Cardiac death during follow-up was due to heart failure in nonoperated patients and to postoperative death in surgical ones. Mitral replacement was required by 15% of patients at 7 years, and its indication was more frequently a poor result rather than progression of mitral disease. Repeated PMV was an option in selected patients with mitral restenosis, but otherwise mitral replacement would be recommended. Long-term event-free survival has been reported by others investigators. Cohen et al11 found a 51% event-free survival at 6 years in 146 patients (mean age 59 years, score 7.7). Pavlides et al14 reported an event-free survival rate of 85% at 3 years in 128 patients (mean age 60 years, score 8.6). Dean et al15 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute registry (736 patients, mean age 54 years) described an event-free survival of 60% at 4 years, and Jung et al13 (528 patients with successful procedures, mean age 46 years) described a rate of 76% at 5 years. In our series, the event-free survival was 69% at 7 years and confirms the long-term beneficial effect of PMV. It is important to emphasize that patients with good results and low score (63% of the population undergoing PMV in our center) had a very high probability (88%) of being event free at 7 years. On the other hand, those with less favorable baseline characteristics or poorer results had an event-free survival rate between 55% and 72%, provided no severe MR had occurred. In such cases, 60% of patients will require mitral replacement within 3 years. That simple postprocedural assignment into 3 subgroups with good, intermediate, or poor prognosis may be useful.

Comparison With Surgical Series
Immediate results appear to be very similar29 30 31 32 to closed surgical commissurotomy as reported by Arora et al29 in a prospective randomized study of very young (mean age 19 years) patients and Raghaba et al30 in older patients. The only long-term though relatively small (30 patients in each group) randomized study comparing surgical closed, open, and percutaneous commissurotomy has been recently published by Farhat et al33 in a young population with pliable, noncalcified valves. The 7-year results were better for open and percutaneous procedures than for closed commissurotomy as assessed by a higher event-free survival (93%, 90%, and 50%, respectively), a better mitral area (1.8, 1.8, and 1.3 cm2 and a lower restenosis rate (6%, 6%, and 37%).

In long-term surgical series,34 35 36 37 38 Hickey et al34 reported on 103 patients with closed commissurotomy (mean age 38 years) a mitral replacement rate of 22% at 10 and 53% at 20 years; Rhial et al35 reported on 267 patients (mean age 43 years) a replacement rate of 43% and 76% at 10 and 20 years. In our series and others,39 even if patients have a poorer baseline clinical profile (many not even have been candidates for commissurotomy should open heart surgery be performed), mitral replacement rate was not worse than that of surgical series at least by the seventh year. Nevertheless, longer follow-up periods are needed for making such a conclusion.

Conclusions
PMV is a safe and effective procedure for patients with mitral stenosis. Patients with a good score obtain better initial and long-term results, but those with a less favorable profile may still have sustained hemodynamic and symptomatic relief. The decrease in MVA, although mild in most patients, was progressive over time, whereas regurgitation tend to be stable.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr Cristina Fernandez for statistical support.

Received July 30, 1998; revision received December 7, 1998; accepted December 18, 1998.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Inoue K, Okawi T, Nakamura T, Kitamura F, Miyamoto N. Clinical application of transvenous mitral commissurotomy by a new balloon catheter. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1984;87:394–402.[Abstract]
  2. Lock JE, Khalilullah M, Shrisvasta S, Bahl V, Keane JF. Percutaneous catheter commissurotomy in rheumatic mitral stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:1515–1518.[Abstract]
  3. Vahanian A, Michel PL, Comier B, Vitoux B, Michel X, Slama M, Enriquez L, Trabelsi S, Ismail MB, Acar J. Results of percutaneous mitral commissurotomy in 200 patients. Am J Cardiol. 1989;63:847–852.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Nobuyoshi M, Hamasaki N, Kimura T, Nosaka H, Yokoi H, Yasumoto H, Horiuchi H, Nakashima H, Shindo T, Mori T, Miyamoto AT, Inoue K. Indication, complications, and short-term clinical outcome of percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy. Circulation. 1989;80:782–792.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Abascal VM, Wilkins GT, O'Shea CY, Choong CY, Palacios IF, Thomas JD, Rosas E, Newell JB, Block PC, Weyman AE. Prediction of successful outcome in 130 patients undergoing percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy. Circulation. 1990;82:448–456.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Balloon Valvuloplasty Registry. Multicenter experience with balloon mitral commissurotomy: NHLBI balloon valvuloplasty registry report on immediate and 30-day follow-up results. Circulation. 1992;85:448–461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Hung JS, Chen MS, Wu JJ, Fu M, Yeh KH, Wu YC, Chen WJ, Chua S, Lee CB. Short and long-term results of catheter balloon percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy. Am J Cardiol. 1991;67:854–862.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Desideri A, Vanderperren O, Serra A, Barraud P, Petitclerc R, Lesperance J, Dyrda I, Crepeau, Bonan R. Long-term (9-33 months) echocardiographic follow-up after successful percutaneous mitral commissurotomy. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:1602–1606.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Palacios IF, Block PC, Wilkins GT, Weyman AE. Follow-up of patients undergoing percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy: analysis of factors determining restenosis. Circulation. 1989;79:573–579.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Treviño AJ, Ibarra M, Garcia A, Uribe A, de la Fuente F, Bonfil MA, Feldman T. Immediate and long-term results of balloon mitral commissurotomy for rheumatic mitral stenosis: comparison between Inoue and double balloon techniques. Am Heart J. 1996;131:530–536.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Cohen DJ, Kuntz RE, Gordon SPF, Piana RN, Safian RD, McKay RG, Baim D, Grossman W, Diver DJ. Predictors of long-term outcome after percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty. N Engl J Med.. 1992;327:1329–1335.[Abstract]
  12. Chen CR, Cheng TO, Chen JY, Zhou YL, Mei J, Ma TZ. Long-term results of percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty with Inoue balloon catheter. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:1445–1448.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Jung B, Comier B, Ducimetiere P, Porte JM, Nallet O, Michel PL, Acar J, Vahanian A. Functional result 5 years after successful percutaneous mitral commissurotomy in a series of 528 patients and analysis of predictive factors. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:407–414.[Abstract]
  14. Pavlides GS, Nahlas G, London J, Gangadharan C, Troszak E, Barth-Jones D, Puchrowicz-Ochocki S, O'Neill WW. Predictors of long-term event-free survival after percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1997;70:1370–1374.
  15. Dean LS, Mickel M, Bonan R, Holmes DR, O'Neill WW, Palacios IF, Rahimtoola S, Salter JN, Davis K, Kennedy JW. Four-year follow-up of patients undergoing percutaneous balloon mitral commissurotomy: a report from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute balloon valvuloplasty registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:1452–1457.[Abstract]
  16. Wilkins GT, Weyman AE, Abascal VM, Block PC, Palacios IF. Percutaneous balloon dilation of the mitral valve: an analysis of echocardiographic variables related to outcome and mechanisms of dilation. Br Heart J. 1988;60:229–308.
  17. Hatle L, Angelsen B, Tromsdal A. Noninvasive assessment of atrioventricular pressure half-time by Doppler ultrasound. Circulation. 1979;60:1096–1104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Helmcke F, Nanda NC, Hsiung MC, Soto B, Adey C, Goyal RG, Gatewood RP. Color Doppler assessment of mitral regurgitation with orthogonal planes. Circulation. 1987;75:175–183.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–481.
  20. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc. 1972;34:197–220.
  21. Rodriguez L, Monterroso VH, Abascal VM, King ME, O'Shea JP, Palacios IF, Weyman AE. Does asymmetric mitral valve disease predict an adverse outcome after percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy? An echocardiographic study. Am Heart J. 1992;123:1687–1692.
  22. Roth RB, Block PC, Palacios IF. Predictors of increase mitral regurgitation after percutaneous mitral valvotomy. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1990;20:17–21.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Hernández R, Macaya C, Bañuelos C, Alfonso F, Goicolea J, Iñiguez A, Fernández-Ortiz A, Castillo J, Aragoncillo P, Gil-Aguado M, Zarco P. Predictors, mechanisms and outcome of severe mitral regurgitation complicating percutaneous mitral valvotomy with the Inoue balloon. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:1169–1174.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Herrmann HC, Lima JA, Feldman T, Chisholm R, Isner J, O'Neill WW, Ramaswamy K, for the North American Inoue Balloon Investigators. Mechanisms and outcome of severe mitral regurgitation after Inoue balloon valvuloplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:783–789.[Abstract]
  25. Padial LR, Freitas N, Sagie A, Newell JB, Weyman AE, Levine RA, Palacios I. Echocardiography can predict which patients will develop severe mitral regurgitation after percutaneous mitral valvulotomy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:1225–1231.[Abstract]
  26. Essop MR, Wisenbugh T, Skoularigis J, Middlemost S, Sareli P. Mitral regurgitation following mitral balloon valvotomy: differing mechanisms for severe versus mild to moderate lesions. Circulation. 1991;84:1669–1679.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Sagie A, Freitas N, Padial LR, Leavitt M, Morris E, Weyman AE, Levine RA. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of long-term progression of mitral stenosis in 103 patients: valve area and right heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:482–489.
  28. Gordon SP, Douglas PS, Come PC, Manning WJ. Two dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic determinants of natural history of mitral valve narrowing in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis: implications for follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:968–973.[Abstract]
  29. Arora R, Nair M, Kalra GS, Nigam MS, Khalilullah M. Immediate and long-term results of balloon and surgical closed mitral valvotomy: a randomized comparative study. Am Heart J. 1993;125:1091–1094.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Raghaba PR, Zoltan C, Turi G, Raju S, Wynne J, Fromm B, Farkas SI, Farkas P. Percutaneous balloon versus closed mitral commissurotomy: 7 year follow-up of a randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;259A. Abstract.
  31. Patel JJ, Shama D, Mitha AS, Blyth D, Hassen F, Le Roux BT, Chetty S. Balloon valvuloplasty versus closed commissurotomy for pliable mitral stenosis: a prospective hemodynamic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:1318–1322.[Abstract]
  32. Reyes VP, Raju BS, Wynne J, Stiphenson LW, Raju R, Fromm BS, Rajagopal P, Metha P, Singh S, Rao P, Satyanarayana PV, Turi ZG. Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty compared with open surgical commissurotomy for mitral stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:961–967.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Farhat MB, Ayari M, Maatouk F, Betbout F, Gamra H, Jarrar M, Tiss M, Hammami S, Thaalbi R, Addad F. Percutaneous balloon versus surgical closed and open mitral commissurotomy: 7-year follow-up results of a randomized trial. Circulation. 1998;97:245–250.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Hickey MS, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW, Dean LS. Outcome probabilities and life history after surgical mitral commissurotomy: implications for balloon commissurotomy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:29–42.[Abstract]
  35. Rihal CS, Schaff HV, Frye RL, Bailey KR, Hammes LN, Holmes DR. Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing closed transventricular mitral commissurotomy: a useful surrogate for percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:781–786.[Abstract]
  36. Commerford PJ, Hastie T, Beck W. Closed mitral valvotomy: actuarial analysis of results in 654 patients over 12 years and analysis of preoperative predictors of long-term survival. Ann Thorac Surg. 1982;33:473–479.[Abstract]
  37. John S, Bashi VV, Jariraj PS, Muralidharan S, Ravikumar E, Rajarajeswami S, Sukumar IP, Rao S. Closed mitral valvotomy: early results and long-term follow-up of 3724 consecutive patients. Circulation. 1983;68:891–896.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Hegger JJ, Wann LS, Weyman AE, Dillon JCM, Feigenbaum H. Long-term changes in mitral area after successful mitral commissurotomy. Circulation. 1979;59:443–448.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Kotsuka Y, Furuse A, Yagyu K, Kawauchi M, Takeda M, Hirata K. Mitral valve replacement after percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;4:530–535.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
2006 WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, et al.
2008 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Circulation, October 7, 2008; 118(15): e523 - e661.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M.-J. Kim, J.-K. Song, J.-M. Song, D.-H. Kang, Y.-H. Kim, C. W. Lee, M.-K. Hong, J.-J. Kim, S.-W. Park, and S.-J. Park
Long-Term Outcomes of Significant Mitral Regurgitation After Percutaneous Mitral Valvuloplasty
Circulation, December 19, 2006; 114(25): 2815 - 2822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. D. Zimmet, A. A. Almeida, R. W. Harper, J. J. Smolich, J. Goldstein, G. C. Shardey, and J. A. Smith
Predictors of surgery after percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 82(3): 828 - 833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al.
ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): e1 - e148.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al.
ACC/AHA 2006 Practice Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): 598 - 675.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. E. Fawzy, H. Hegazy, M. Shoukri, F. El Shaer, A. ElDali, and M. Al-Amri
Long-term clinical and echocardiographic results after successful mitral balloon valvotomy and predictors of long-term outcome
Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2005; 26(16): 1647 - 1652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. A. Gomez-Hospital, A. Cequier, P. V. Romero, C. Canete, C. Ugartemendia, E. Iraculis, and E. Esplugas
Persistence of Lung Function Abnormalities Despite Sustained Success of Percutaneous Mitral Valvotomy: The Need for an Early Indication
Chest, January 1, 2005; 127(1): 40 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Vahanian and I. F. Palacios
Percutaneous Approaches to Valvular Disease
Circulation, April 6, 2004; 109(13): 1572 - 1579.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
H Gamra, F Betbout, K Ben Hamda, F Addad, F Maatouk, Z Dridi, S Hammami, M Abdellaoui, H Boughanmi, T Hendiri, et al.
Balloon mitral commissurotomy in juvenile rheumatic mitral stenosis: a ten-year clinical and echocardiographic actuarial results
Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2003; 24(14): 1349 - 1356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
B D Prendergast, T R D Shaw, B Iung, A Vahanian, and D B Northridge
Contemporary criteria for the selection of patients for percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty
Heart, May 1, 2002; 87(5): 401 - 404.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Wang, R. A. Krasuski, J. J. Warner, K. Pieper, K. B. Kisslo, T. M. Bashore, and J. K. Harrison
Serial echocardiographic evaluation of restenosis after successful percutaneous mitral commissurotomy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 16, 2002; 39(2): 328 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
E. Yetkin, S. Cehreli, M. ileri, K. Senen, R. Atak, A. Yanik, O. Yetkin, and H. Sasmaz
Comparison of Clinical Echocardiographic and Hemodynamic Characteristics of Male and Female Patients who Underwent Mitral Balloon Valvuloplasty
Angiology, December 1, 2001; 52(12): 835 - 839.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A. Vahanian
VALVE DISEASE: Balloon valvuloplasty
Heart, February 1, 2001; 85(2): 223 - 228.
[Full Text]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
B Iung, E Garbarz, P Michaud, O Fondard, S Helou, J Kamblock, P Berdah, P.-L Michel, P Lionet, B Cormier, et al.
Immediate and mid-term results of repeat percutaneous mitral commissurotomy for restenosis following earlier percutaneous mitral commissurotomy
Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2000; 21(20): 1683 - 1689.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. O. Cheng, R. Hernandez, C. Banuelos, F. Alfonso, J. Goicolea, A. Fernandez-Ortiz, J. Escaned, L. Azcona, C. Almeria, and C. Macaya
Long-Term Results of Percutaneous Balloon Mitral Valvuloplasty Using the Inoue Balloon Catheter Technique • Response
Circulation, February 29, 2000; 101 (8): e91 - e91.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
I. F. Palacios, P. L. Sanchez, L. C. Harrell, A. E. Weyman, and P. C. Block
Which Patients Benefit From Percutaneous Mitral Balloon Valvuloplasty?: Prevalvuloplasty and Postvalvuloplasty Variables That Predict Long-Term Outcome
Circulation, March 26, 2002; 105(12): 1465 - 1471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez, R.
Right arrow Articles by Macaya, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez, R.
Right arrow Articles by Macaya, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs