(Circulation. 1999;99:1422-1425.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Cardiovascular Division (E.L., P.D.M., D.D., J.L.S.), Department of Medicine (E.L., P.D.M., D.D., J.L.S., E.W.H.), and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (T.R.R.), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa.
Correspondence to Evan Loh, MD, Cardiovascular Division, 9 Founders Pavilion, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104. E-mail lohe{at}mail.med.upenn.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsAMPD1 genotype was determined
in 132 patients with advanced CHF and 91 control reference subjects by
use of a polymerase chain reactionbased, allele-specific
oligonucleotide detection assay. In patients with CHF,
those heterozygous (n=20) or homozygous (n=1) for the mutant AMPD1
allele (AMPD1 +/- or -/-, respectively) experienced a
significantly longer duration of heart failure symptoms before referral
for transplantation evaluation than CHF patients homozygous for the
wild-type allele (AMPD1 +/+; n=111; 7.6±6.5 versus 3.2±3.6 years;
P<0.001). The OR of surviving without cardiac
transplantation
5 years after initial hospitalization for CHF
symptoms was 8.6 times greater (95% CI: 3.05, 23.87) in those patients
carrying
1 mutant AMPD1 allele than in those carrying 2 wild-type
AMPD1 +/+ alleles.
ConclusionsAfter the onset of CHF symptoms, the mutant AMPD1 allele is associated with prolonged probability of survival without cardiac transplantation. The mechanism by which the presence of the mutant AMPD1 allele may modify the clinical phenotype of heart failure remains to be determined.
Key Words: heart failure genes survival
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The gene selected for evaluation in this congestive heart failure
(CHF) population was the adenosine monophosphate deaminase 1
(AMPD1) gene. A nonsense mutation in the AMPD1
gene is arguably one of the most common inherited defects in whites and
blacks. Approximately 20% of individuals in these ethnic groups are
heterozygous for a single mutant allele that leads to premature
peptide chain termination and production of a truncated,
catalytically inactive enzyme.6 7 The
AMPD1 gene is expressed at high levels in skeletal myocytes,
and individuals who are either homozygous or heterozygous for this
mutant allele have reduced AMPD activity in their skeletal
muscle.6 7 8 AMPD is located at a central position in
adenine nucleotide catabolism, and reduced activity of this
enzyme would be expected to enhance adenosine (a potent
cardioprotective agent) production in skeletal muscle after ATP
catabolism (Figure 1
). Increased skeletal
muscle adenosine production has been demonstrated in
individuals without known cardiovascular disease who
are homozygous for the AMPD1 mutant allele.9
|
We hypothesized that inheritance of the mutant AMPD1 allele might prove advantageous to patients with CHF and tested the hypothesis that inheritance of this mutant allele was associated with an increase in the probability of survival without cardiac transplantation after the onset of CHF symptoms.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Genetic Analysis
Genomic DNA was prepared from peripheral white blood
cells of each patient. AMPD1 genotype was determined by use of
a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)based, allele-specific
oligonucleotide detection assay as reported
previously6 (Figure 2
).
|
Statistical Analysis
The frequencies of the AMPD1 +/+, AMPD1 +/-, and AMPD1 -/-
genotypes in the control reference group and in patients with
CHF were compared by Fisher's exact test. Only 1 CHF subject was
homozygous for the mutant AMPD1 allele. For the purposes of this
study, this single AMPD1 -/- individual was included in the group
heterozygous for the mutant allele; exclusion of this individual
from the analysis did not alter the results of any statistical
analyses.
Mean and median durations of heart failure symptoms for the AMPD1 +/+
versus AMPD1 +/- and -/- genotypes were determined.
Analyses with survival analysis techniques were
performed to evaluate whether duration of disease differed between the
AMPD1 +/+ and AMPD1 +/- and -/- genotypes. Both Kaplan-Meier
and proportional hazards models were fitted by use of SAS version 6.1
software. The onset of heart failure symptoms was defined by the first
hospital admission for the diagnosis of CHF. This date was established
and verified by either retrospective chart review, direct patient
interviews, or discussion with the referring physician(s) by a single
investigator (P.D.M.) blinded to the genotype status of the
patients. Others who have studied end-stage CHF patients have adopted
similar criteria for dating the onset of CHF.10 Heart
failure symptom duration was defined as the duration of disease
symptoms from first hospital admission for CHF to time of the combined
end point of cardiac transplantation or death. As in other
studies,11 cardiac transplantation and death were
considered to be the combined end point of interest, and all others
(including those who were event-free at the end of the observation
period) were treated as censored observations. Proportional hazards
models were also fitted to obtain hazard ratio estimates and 95% CIs
for the effect of the AMPD1 genotype adjusted for potential
confounders. All continuous variables are presented as
mean±1 SD. Significance was established if the null hypothesis could
be rejected at a P value
0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
O2 max was 13.9±4.9
mL · kg-1 ·
min-1. Causes of CHF included coronary
artery disease (n=69), idiopathic cardiomyopathy
(n=48), and "other" (n=15; 4 valvular, 2 infiltrative, 3
congenital, 2 myocarditis, and 4 alcohol). (See Table 1
|
Clinical Characteristics of Heart Failure Across AMPD1
Genotype
Of the 132 patients enrolled in this study, 111 were
homozygous for the wild-type allele (+/+), 20 were heterozygous
(+/-), and 1 individual was homozygous for the mutant AMPD1 allele
(-/-). LVEF, cardiac index, pulmonary capillary wedge
pressure,
O2 max, and
pulmonary vascular resistance were not significantly different
between CHF patients with the +/+ versus +/- and -/-
genotypes (Table 1
).
AMPD1 Genotype and Clinical Outcome
The time from first hospital admission for CHF symptoms to the
clinical end point of evaluation for cardiac transplantation was
markedly different between AMPD1 +/- or -/- and AMPD1 +/+ patients
(7.6±6.5 years, AMPD1 +/- or -/- versus 3.2±3.6 years, AMPD1 +/+;
P<0.0001). There was a trend for patients with the mutant
AMPD1 allele (+/- or -/-) to be older than the AMPD1 +/+
homozygotes (56.8±7.1 versus 52.1±11.6 years; P=0.07;
t test assuming unequal variances) at the time of initial
referral for cardiac transplantation evaluation.
Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that individuals with 1 or 2
mutant AMPD1 alleles (+/- or -/-) had an increased probability
of survival without cardiac transplantation for a significantly longer
time after the first hospitalization for CHF symptoms than patients
homozygous for the wild-type allele (Figure 3
; P<0.001). In the
individuals with the mutant AMPD1 allele, there were 2 deaths (both
of progressive heart failure), and 3 heart transplants were performed
over the observation period after enrollment into the study. In the
individuals without the mutant AMPD1 allele, there were 11 deaths
(8 of progressive heart failure, 2 of sudden cardiac death, and 1 of
multisystem organ failure), and 40 heart transplants were performed.
The proportional hazards model indicates a risk ratio of 4.44 (95% CI:
1.59, 12.35) for age- and sex-adjusted heart failure symptom and
disease duration associated with the mutant AMPD1 genotype
(Table 2
).
|
|
To determine the relationship of AMPD1 genotype and other
clinical factors to the probability of survival without cardiac
transplantation (Table 3
), we fit
a multivariate proportional hazards model that
considered AMPD1 genotype in addition to race, cause of heart
failure (ischemic versus nonischemic), adjuvant medical
therapy (ACE inhibitor, digoxin, or diuretics),
O2 max, and LVEF. The
proportional hazards model indicates a hazard ratio of 4.65 (95% CI:
1.48, 14.66) for adjusted heart failure symptom and disease duration
associated with the mutant AMPD1 genotype. This result is
nearly identical to the unadjusted heart failure symptom and disease
duration associated with the mutant AMPD1 genotype (Table 2
), which suggests that these other factors did not modify the
hazard ratio point estimate of AMPD1 genotype as a predictor of
survival.
|
AMPD1 Genotype Frequency in Heart Failure Patients
The frequency of the AMPD1 +/- or -/- genotype in CHF
patients might be expected to vary depending on the elapsed time
between the onset of CHF symptoms and the performance of
genotyping. Among patients who presented <5 years from the
first hospitalization for CHF, 7 (16.7% genotype frequency) of
the 97 carried the mutant AMPD1 allele. In the group that
presented
5 years after the first hospitalization for CHF, 14
(43% genotype frequency) of the 35 carried the mutant AMPD1
allele (
2=20.66; P<0.001
compared with CHF patients with symptom duration <5 years). With the
Mantel-Haenszel method of analysis, a patient carrying the
mutant AMPD1 allele (+/- or -/-) had an 8.6 OR (relative to an
individual homozygous for the wild-type allele +/+) of living
5
years with CHF before dying or requiring cardiac transplantation.
When the AMPD1 genotype frequency of these 2 subgroups of
CHF patients was compared with a group of normal volunteers (n=91), the
CHF patients who presented <5 years after first
hospitalization for CHF were found to have a lower frequency of the
mutant allele than the control population (16.7% versus 25.3%;
P<0.001). In contrast, CHF patients who presented
5 years after initial hospitalization for CHF demonstrated a trend
toward a higher frequency of the mutant allele than the control
population (43% versus 25.3%; P=NS).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One possible mechanism that may underlie the association between
inheritance of the mutant AMPD1 allele and improved clinical
outcomes in patients with CHF could be a direct consequence of the
reduction in AMPD activity. As illustrated in Figure 1
, reduced
AMPD activity could lead to enhanced production of
adenosine in skeletal muscle and could accentuate the increased
circulating levels of adenosine observed in patients with
CHF.12 Adenosine has the potential to be a potent
cardioprotective agent, leading to increased regional coronary
blood flow,13 14 induction of the ischemic
preconditioning response,15 16 17 suppression of
arrhythmias,16 and suppression of cytokine
production.18 19 An additional cardioprotective
effect of adenosine, mediated via adenosine receptors,
is attenuation of release of catecholamines,
ß-adrenoreceptormediated myocardial
hypercontraction, and Ca2+
overload.20 21 22 Recently, other investigators have
observed myocardial protection provided for by ischemia in
noncardiac tissue, yielding the concept of "ischemic
preconditioning at a distance."23 24 Because the
population of inference for these current results are patients with
advanced CHF referred specifically for cardiac transplantation
evaluation, we cannot at this time extrapolate these observations to
patients with less-advanced New York Heart Association symptom
classifications of heart failure or asymptomatic patients
with milder degrees of left ventricular dysfunction.
Limitations of this study include the lack of genotype information at the time of first onset of CHF symptoms, the combined end-point outcome used, and its retrospective nature. Finally, there are no skeletal or circulating adenosine levels to determine whether heterozygosity at the AMPD1 allele is associated with clinically significant alterations in adenosine production.
Nevertheless, these observations will serve as the impetus for future prospective studies to examine these hypotheses and to determine the specific pathophysiological mechanisms that may explain these differences in clinical outcomes.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received August 13, 1998; revision received November 19, 1998; accepted November 28, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Berko BA, Swift EP. X-linked dilated cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:11861191.[Abstract]
3. Michels VV, Driscoll DJ, Miller FA. Familial aggregation of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1985;55:12321233.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Graber HL, Unverferth DV, Baker PB, Ryan JM, Baba N,
Wooley CF. Evolution of a hereditary cardiac conduction and muscle
disorder: a study involving a family with six generations affected.
Circulation. 1986;74:2135.
5. Mestroni L, Miani D, Di Lenarda A, Silvestri F, Bussani R, Filippi G, Camerini F. Clinical and pathologic study of familial dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1990;65:14491453.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Morisaki T, Gross M, Morisaki H, Pongtratz G, Zollner
N, Holmes EW. Molecular basis of AMP deaminase deficiency in skeletal
muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:64576461.
7. Sabina RL, Holmes EW. Myoadenylate deaminase deficiency. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, eds. The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Inc; 1995;II:17691780.
8. Sinkeler SPT, Joosten EMG, Wevers RA, Oei TL, Jacobs AE, Veerkamp JH, Hammel BC. Myoadenylate deaminase deficiency: a clinical, genetic, and biochemical study in nine families. Muscle Nerve. 1988;11:312317.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Sabina RL, Swain JL, Olanow CW, Bradley WG, Fishbein WN, DiMauro S, Holmes EW. Myoadenylate deaminase deficiency: functional and metabolic abnormalities associated with disruption of the purine nucleotide cycle. J Clin Invest. 1984;73:720730.
10.
Ghali JK, Cooper R, Ford E. Trends in hospitalization
rates for heart failure in the United States, 19731986. Arch
Intern Med. 1990;150:769773.
11.
Aaronson KD, Schwartz JS, Chen TM, Wong KL, Goin JE,
Mancini DM. Development and prospective validation of a clinical index
to predict survival in ambulatory patients referred for cardiac
transplant evaluation. Circulation. 1997;95:25972599.
12.
Funaya H, Kitakaze M, Node K, Minamino T, Komamura K,
Masatsugu H. Plasma adenosine levels increase in patients with
chronic heart failure. Circulation. 1997;95:13631365.
13. Fuller R, Maxwell D, Conradson T, Dixon C, Barnes P. Circulatory and respiratory effects of infused adenosine in conscious man. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1987;24:309317.
14.
Hori M, Kitakaze M. Adenosine, the heart, and
coronary circulation. Hypertension. 1991;18:565574.
15.
Downey JM, Liu GS, Thornton JD. Adenosine and
the anti-infarct effects of preconditioning. Cardiovasc Res. 1993;27:38.
16.
Whittaker P, Kloner RA, Przyklenk K. Intramyocardial
injections and protection against myocardial ischemia: an
attempt to examine the cardioprotective actions of adenosine.
Circulation. 1996;93:20432051.
17.
Toombs CF, McGee DS, Johnston WE, Vinten-Johansen J.
Myocardial protective effects of adenosine: infarct size
reduction with pretreatment and continued receptor stimulation during
ischemia. Circulation. 1992;86:986994.
18.
Cronstein BN. Adenosine, an
endogenous anti-inflammatory agent. J Appl
Physiol. 1994;76:513.
19. Bouma MG, Stad RK, van den Wildenberg FAJM, Burman WA. Differential regulatory effects of adenosine on cytokine release by activated human monocytes. J Immunol. 1994;133:41594168.
20. Kitakaze M, Hori M, Kamada T. The role of adenosine and its interaction with alpha-adrenoceptor activity in myocardial ischemic and reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res. 1993;27:1827.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Hori M, Kitakaze M. Adenosine, the heart, and coronary circulation. Hypertension. 1991;18:565574.
22. Kitakaze M, Hori M, Kamada T. The role of adenosine and its interaction with alpha-adrenoceptor activity in myocardial ischemic and reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res. 1993;27:1827.
23.
Gho BCG, Schoemaker RG, van den Doel MA, Duncker DJ,
Verdouw PD. Myocardial protection by brief ischemia in
noncardiac tissue. Circulation. 1996;94:21932200.
24.
Birnbaum Y, Hale SL, Kloner RA. Ischemic
preconditioning at a distance: reduction of myocardial infarct size by
partial reduction of blood supply combined with rapid stimulation of
gastrocnemius muscle in the rabbit. Circulation. 1997;96:16411646.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Xu, J. Fassett, X. Hu, G. Zhu, Z. Lu, Y. Li, J. Schnermann, R. J. Bache, and Y. Chen Ecto-5'-Nucleotidase Deficiency Exacerbates Pressure-Overload-Induced Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Dysfunction Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1557 - 1564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. P. Riksen, B. Franke, W. J.G. Oyen, G. F. Borm, P. van den Broek, O. C. Boerman, P. Smits, and G. A. Rongen Augmented hyperaemia and reduced tissue injury in response to ischaemia in subjects with the 34C > T variant of the AMPD1 gene Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2007; 28(9): 1085 - 1091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Funakoshi, L. C. Zacharia, Z. Tang, J. Zhang, L. L. Lee, J. C. Good, D. E. Herrmann, Y. Higuchi, W. J. Koch, E. K. Jackson, et al. A1 Adenosine Receptor Upregulation Accompanies Decreasing Myocardial Adenosine Levels in Mice With Left Ventricular Dysfunction Circulation, May 1, 2007; 115(17): 2307 - 2315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ashrafian and H. Watkins Reviews of Translational Medicine and Genomics in Cardiovascular Disease: New Disease Taxonomy and Therapeutic Implications: Cardiomyopathies: Therapeutics Based on Molecular Phenotype J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 27, 2007; 49(12): 1251 - 1264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Funakoshi, T. O. Chan, J. C. Good, J. R. Libonati, J. Piuhola, X. Chen, S. M. MacDonnell, L. L. Lee, D. E. Herrmann, J. Zhang, et al. Regulated Overexpression of the A1-Adenosine Receptor in Mice Results in Adverse but Reversible Changes in Cardiac Morphology and Function Circulation, November 21, 2006; 114(21): 2240 - 2250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Richard, E. Villard, P. Charron, and R. Isnard The Genetic Bases of Cardiomyopathies J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 27, 2006; 48(9_Suppl_A): A79 - A89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Donahue, D. A. Marchuk, and H. A. Rockman Redefining Heart Failure: The Utility of Genomics J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 3, 2006; 48(7): 1289 - 1298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Chen, S. Epperson, L. Makhsudova, B. Ito, J. Suarez, W. Dillmann, and F. Villarreal Functional effects of enhancing or silencing adenosine A2b receptors in cardiac fibroblasts Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): H2478 - H2486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Toyama, H Morisaki, Y Kitamura, M Gross, T Tamura, Y Nakahori, J M Vance, M Speer, N Kamatani, and T Morisaki Haplotype analysis of human AMPD1 gene: origin of common mutant allele J. Med. Genet., June 1, 2004; 41(6): e74 - e74. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Feldman The emerging role of pharmacogenomics in the treatment of patients with heart failure Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2003; 76(6): S2246 - 2253. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Le Corvoisier, H.-Y. Park, K. M. Carlson, D. A. Marchuk, and H. A. Rockman Multiple quantitative trait loci modify the heart failure phenotype in murine cardiomyopathy Hum. Mol. Genet., December 1, 2003; 12(23): 3097 - 3107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K Kalsi, A. H.Y Yuen, I. M Rybakowska, P. H Johnson, E. Slominska, E. J Birks, K. Kaletha, M. H Yacoub, and R. T Smolenski Decreased cardiac activity of AMP deaminase in subjects with the AMPD1 mutation--A potential mechanism of protection in heart failure Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2003; 59(3): 678 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Rico-Sanz, T. Rankinen, D. R. Joanisse, A. S. Leon, J. S. Skinner, J. H. Wilmore, D. C. Rao, and C. Bouchard Associations between cardiorespiratory responses to exercise and the C34T AMPD1 gene polymorphism in the HERITAGE Family study Physiol Genomics, July 7, 2003; 14(2): 161 - 166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P A Henriksen and D E Newby Therapeutic inhibition of tumour necrosis factor {alpha} in patients with heart failure: cooling an inflamed heart Heart, January 1, 2003; 89(1): 14 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Anderson, J. Habashi, J. F. Carlquist, J. B. Muhlestein, B. D. Horne, T. L. Bair, R. R. Pearson, and N. Hart A common variant of the AMPD1 gene predicts improved cardiovascular survival in patients with coronary artery disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2000; 36(4): 1248 - 1252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Francis TNF-{alpha} and Heart Failure : The Difference Between Proof of Principle and Hypothesis Testing Circulation, June 29, 1999; 99(25): 3213 - 3214. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Feldman, D. R. Wagner, and D. M. McNamara AMPD1 Gene Mutation in Congestive Heart Failure : New Insights Into the Pathobiology of Disease Progression Circulation, March 23, 1999; 99(11): 1397 - 1399. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Pucar, E. Janssen, P. P. Dzeja, N. Juranic, S. Macura, B. Wieringa, and A. Terzic Compromised Energetics in the Adenylate Kinase AK1 Gene Knockout Heart under Metabolic Stress J. Biol. Chem., December 22, 2000; 275(52): 41424 - 41429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Genetta, H. Morisaki, T. Morisaki, and E. W. Holmes A Novel Bipartite Intronic Splicing Enhancer Promotes the Inclusion of a Mini-exon in the AMP Deaminase 1 Gene J. Biol. Chem., June 29, 2001; 276(27): 25589 - 25597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Suzuki, K. M. Carlson, D. A. Marchuk, and H. A. Rockman Genetic Modifier Loci Affecting Survival and Cardiac Function in Murine Dilated Cardiomyopathy Circulation, April 16, 2002; 105(15): 1824 - 1829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |