Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1998;98:308-314

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Pavri, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Pavri, B.

(Circulation. 1998;98:308-314.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia After Myocardial Infarction

William G. Stevenson, MD; Peter L. Friedman, MD, PhD; Dusan Kocovic, MD; Philip T. Sager, MD; Leslie A. Saxon, MD; ; Behzad Pavri, MD

From the Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (W.G.S., P.L.F., L.A.S.); the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Wadsworth VA Medical Center, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, Calif (P.T.S); and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (D.K., B.P.). Dr Saxon is now at the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco.

Correspondence to William G. Stevenson, MD, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail wgstevenso{at}bics.bwh.harvard.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) after myocardial infarction often have multiple morphologies of inducible VT, which complicates mapping and is viewed by some as a relative contraindication to ablation. Attempting to identify and target a single "clinical" VT is often limited by inability to obtain 12-lead ECGs of VTs that are terminated emergently or by defibrillators. This study assesses the feasibility of ablation in patients selected without regard to the presence of multiple VTs by targeting all VTs that allow mapping.

Methods and Results—Radiofrequency catheter ablation targeting all inducible monomorphic VTs that allowed mapping was performed in 52 patients with prior myocardial infarction. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy had failed in 41 (79%) patients including amiodarone in 36 (69%) patients. An average of 3.6±2 morphologies of VT were induced per patient. More than 1 ablation session was required in 16 (31%) patients. Complications occurred in 5 (10%) patients, including 1 (2%) death caused by acute myocardial infarction. During follow-up 59% of patients continued to receive amiodarone; 23 (45%) had implantable defibrillators. During a mean follow-up of 18±15 months (range 0 to 51 months) 1 patient died suddenly, 2 died from uncontrollable VT, and 5 died from heart failure. Three-year survival rate was 70±10%, and rate for risk of VT recurrence was 33±7%.

Conclusions—Radiofrequency catheter ablation controls VT that is sufficiently stable to allow mapping in 67% of patients despite failure of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and multiple inducible VTs. However, ablation was largely adjunctive to amiodarone and defibrillators in this referral population.


Key Words: catheter ablation • tachycardia • myocardial infarction


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Catheter ablation of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) late after myocardial infarction has been challenging. These arrhythmias arise from reentry circuits that can be large and complex, with broad paths and narrow isthmuses, and that may traverse subendocardial, intramural, and epicardial regions of the myocardium.1 2 Mapping and ablation are further complicated by the frequent presence of multiple reentry circuits, giving rise to several morphologically different VTs.2 3 4 5 6 7 In some cases different reentry circuits form in the same abnormal region. In other cases reentry circuits form at disparate sites in the infarct. The presence of multiple morphologies of inducible or spontaneous VT has been associated with antiarrhythmic drug inefficacy5 and failure of surgical ablation.6

Several investigators have reported series of patients selected for having 1 predominant morphology of VT, who were treated with radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation.8 9 10 It is likely that this represents <10% of the total population of patients with VT.10 Ablation that focused on the "clinical tachycardia" but did not target other inducible VTs successfully abolished the "clinical" VT in 71% to 76% of cases. However, during follow-up, up to 31% of patients with acutely successful ablation of the "clinical" VT had arrhythmia recurrences, some of which were due to a VT different from that initially targeted for ablation.

There are several difficulties with selecting a dominant, "clinical" VT for ablation. Often it is not possible to determine which VT is in fact the one that has occurred spontaneously. Only a limited recording of 1 or a few ECG leads may be available. In patients with implantable defibrillators VT is typically terminated by the device before an ECG is obtained. Even if 1 VT is identified as predominant, other VTs that are inducible may subsequently occur spontaneously.

An alternative approach is not to consider the number of VT morphologies in determining eligibility for catheter ablation but rather to attempt ablation of all inducible VTs that are sufficiently tolerated to allow mapping. The purpose of this report is to assess the feasibility and summarize the initial experience with this approach.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
From February 1991 to December 1995 endocardial catheter mapping and RF ablation were performed in 52 patients with sustained monomorphic VT late after myocardial infarction referred to Brigham and Women's Hospital, in Boston, Mass, UCLA Medical Center or Wadsworth VA Medical Center in Los Angeles, Calif, and the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, in Philadelphia. Catheter ablation was offered to all patients who had sustained VT that was sufficiently tolerated hemodynamically to allow catheter mapping, provided that access to the left ventricle was possible and that there was no left ventricular pedunculated thrombus present on the transthoracic echocardiogram. Initially, catheter ablation was offered only if spontaneous VT recurred despite antiarrhythmic drug therapy. After the initial 21 patients, ablation was also offered to patients with spontaneous VT without cardiac arrest, who had not failed drug therapy (11 of the subsequent 21 patients). Patient characteristics are shown in the TableDown.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patient Characteristics and Comparison of Patients With and Without Arrhythmia Recurrences

Mapping and Radiofrequency Ablation
Our methods have been described previously.7 11 12 After obtaining informed consent, mapping and RF catheter ablation were performed according to a protocol approved by the human research committee of each respective institution. Left ventricular mapping was performed with 6F or 7F steerable catheters (EP Technologies or Webster Laboratories) that had a 4 mm distal tip electrode and 2 to 2.5 mm spacing between the distal 2 electrodes. Access to the left ventricle was achieved retrogradely across the aortic valve or, in 6 procedures, through transatrial septal puncture. Catheter position was assessed by fluoroscopy and in 5 patients also by transesophageal echocardiography.13 Systemic anticoagulation was achieved with heparin, 5000 U intravenously followed by 1000 U every hour or 2000 U every 2 hours. Sedation was achieved with intermittent doses of midazolam, diazepam, meperidine HCl, and/or fentanyl.

Mapping data from the first 37 patients have been previously reported.7 11 The general approach to mapping and ablation is shown in Figure 1Down. If VT was not incessant, fractionated electrograms were sought during sinus rhythm and pace mapping was performed at these sites to locate regions of slow conduction.12 VT was then initiated by programmed stimulation from the right ventricular apex. Unipolar pacing was performed at the mapping site during VT to reset or entrain the VT, followed immediately by RF current application at selected sites to determine whether or not heating would terminate VT. In the first 15 patients RF current was applied if the site had low amplitude, fractionated electrograms and if pacing from the site entrained VT. On the basis of analysis of the data in these initial 15 patients,7 priority for ablation sites in subsequent patients was given to exit, central, or proximal sites as defined by entrainment11 or if such sites could not be found, sites with isolated potentials or entrainment features suggesting an outer or inner loop,11 and finally if none of these were present at sites with abnormal, presystolic electrograms. If a previously tolerated VT did not allow mapping because of hemodynamic compromise despite adequate cardiac filling pressures, administration of dopamine for hemodynamic support and/or intravenous procainamide to slow the tachycardia was used.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the general approach to mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT). See text for discussion. RF indicates radiofrequency catheter ablation.

RF current (250 or 500 Hz) was applied between the distal electrode on the mapping catheter and a cutaneous adhesive electrode at 15 to 45 W for 20 to 40 seconds during VT. In the first 29 patients power was usually adjusted to produce a fall in impedance, which is an indication of heating.14 In the subsequent patients, temperature monitored from the electrode tip was adjusted to {approx}60°C or a maximum RF current output of 45 to 50 W. If VT terminated, the application was continued for a total of 60 to 120 seconds or until a rise in impedance or boiling at the electrode tip on transesophageal echocardiographic imaging was observed.13 At sites where RF current terminated VT, an attempt was made to enlarge the initial lesion by applying RF current for 60 to 120 seconds during sinus rhythm to sites within {approx}5 mm of the initial lesion. RF ablation at this region was considered adequate when unipolar pacing stimuli at the amplitude that had captured before ablation (usually 10 mA, 2 to 9 ms pulse width) failed to capture after ablation. If any hemodynamically tolerated sustained monomorphic VT was still inducible, the mapping procedure was continued. The procedure was ended when either no hemodynamically tolerated VTs were inducible or when no endocardial target sites critical to reentry, as assessed from entrainment and interruption of VT by RF current, could be found.

Management After Ablation
After ablation, patients were monitored on a cardiac step-down unit or intensive care unit. If amiodarone had been administered long term before the procedure, this medication was continued unless toxicity necessitated stopping. Other antiarrhythmic drugs were discontinued unless the ablation procedure had been clearly unsuccessful; that is, the same VTs that had predominated at the beginning of the procedure remained inducible at the end of the procedure. Aspirin (325 mg) was administered daily. Patients treated with warfarin before the procedure for known or presumed increased risk of systemic emboli received a continuous intravenous infusion of heparin until resumption of warfarin. If sustained VT recurred spontaneously in the hospital after an apparently successful ablation, a repeat ablation attempt was recommended.

If the patient remained free of VT for the following 3 to 7 days, a follow-up electrophysiology study was recommended with additional ablation attempts if VTs had been terminated at the previous session and hemodynamically tolerated VT was again inducible. This follow-up study was performed a mean of 7±14 days (range 3 to 57 days) after the last ablation in 41 of the 44 in whom VT did not recur spontaneously in hospital. In the remaining 3 patients the last electrophysiologic study was performed immediately after ablation. Programmed stimulation included 1, 2, and 3 extrastimuli during pacing at 100 and 150 bpm from the right ventricular apex and right ventricular outflow tract. In 5 patients with VT that had been repeatedly inducible from the right ventricular apex, noninvasive programmed stimulation from an implanted defibrillator was performed, with pacing at only 1 site. The end points for stimulation were reproducible initiation of a tolerated VT, initiation of VT producing syncope, or the third extrastimulus reaching refractoriness. Effects of ablation were defined as (1) no inducible VT: monomorphic VT with a duration of >=30 seconds or requiring earlier termination due to hemodynamic compromise is not inducible; (2) modified: a sustained monomorphic VT is inducible but is different in QRS morphology (frontal plane axis by >30 degrees or precordial transition zone >=1 lead or a different dominant deflection in >1 precordial lead) or cycle length (>100 ms for VTs with a similar morphology) than the VTs for which ablation could be attempted; and (3) inducible VT: a sustained monomorphic VT observed or induced before attempted ablation remains inducible.

If any sustained monomorphic VT remained inducible at the predischarge study, therapy with amiodarone and/or an implantable defibrillator was recommended. Prior amiodarone therapy was continued regardless of the results of electrophysiologic testing unless toxicity warranted stopping. If amiodarone was discontinued, we recommended a repeat electrophysiologic study after 6 to 12 weeks.

Statistics
Continuous data are expressed as mean±1 SD. Groups were compared with the Student's t test, {chi}2 tests, or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression was used to assess predictors of arrhythmia recurrence. Variables used were ejection fraction, failure of amiodarone, failure of any drug, slowest cycle length of induced VT, and number of inducible VTs. Variables with P<0.1 were entered stepwise into the model. Continuous variables were dichotomized at the median (BMDP statistical software, 1992). Survival and arrhythmia recurrences were determined from the date of last ablation with the Kaplan-Meier method (BMDP statistical software, 1992). Arrhythmia recurrences were spontaneous sustained VT or a VT termination by an implanted defibrillator. Patients undergoing cardiac transplantation were censored from the analysis on the day of surgery.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
RF catheter ablation was attempted in 52 patients (TableUp). Antiarrhythmic drug therapy had failed to prevent spontaneous, sustained VT in 41 (79%) patients. Long-term oral amiodarone therapy had failed to suppress spontaneous VT in 33 (63%) patients and had to be withdrawn because of toxicity in 3 (6%) patients. Two patients had only 1 spontaneous episode of sustained monomorphic VT and 50 had had multiple episodes. VT was incessant in 7 (13%) patients. An implantable defibrillator was present in 16 (31%) patients before referral.

Catheter Mapping and Ablation
The 52 patients underwent 69 catheter mapping and ablation sessions; 1 session in 36 patients, 2 sessions in 15 patients, and 3 sessions in 1 patient. At the initial session, 36 patients (69%) were not receiving antiarrhythmic medications. During ablation an average of 3.6±2 different morphologies of monomorphic VT were observed per patient (range 1 to 10). In 5 patients (10%) only 1 VT was induced during the procedure. The average VT cycle length was 423±108 ms (range 260 to 720 ms). Pacing was performed to attempt to entrain 132 VTs in the 52 patients. Reentry circuit exit, central, or proximal regions were identified for 67 VTs in 40 patients.14 RF current was applied during 124 VTs and acutely terminated 74 VTs in 48 patients. In 8 patients entrainment mapping and RF application during VT were limited because pacing or catheter manipulation in the target region terminated VT or hemodynamic intolerance developed during VT. The average number of RF applications per procedure, including those that failed to terminate VT was 23±18 (range 1 to 98, median 19). For all procedures, the average procedure time was 328±136 minutes (range 100 to 725 minutes) and the average fluoroscopy time was 60±32 minutes (range 5 to 135 minutes, median 56 minutes).

Procedure-related complications occurred in 5 (10%) patients. There was 1 (2%) procedure-related death from acute inferior wall myocardial infarction with cardiac rupture 12 hours after a second ablation procedure performed for in-hospital VT recurrence that has previously been reported in detail.15 This patient is included as a death and arrhythmia recurrence in the hospital for all follow-up analyses. This patient also had transient atrioventricular (AV) block observed during the first ablation procedure and developed Staphylococcus epidermidis sepsis from a temporary pacing catheter. One patient had a transient cerebral ischemic event 36 hours after ablation. This patient had a history of identical events before ablation attributed to carotid artery disease. Two patients who had chronic obstructive lung disease developed progressive hypoventilation and required assisted ventilation during the procedure. The remaining complication was a femoral artery pseudoaneurysm. Implantable defibrillators, present in 16 patients, were programmed off during the procedure, and all functioned normally afterward.

Early Effects of Ablation on Inducible and Spontaneous Ventricular Tachycardias
In 10 patients, repeat ablation procedures were performed for VT that recurred spontaneously in the hospital before follow-up study (5 patients) or that was inducible at the pre–hospital discharge study (5 patients). In addition, 5 patients had late repeat procedures. Two patients had a repeat ablation attempt after VT recurred 21 and 18 days, respectively, after hospital discharge, despite no VT inducible before hospital discharge. In 3 patients, amiodarone was discontinued after initial ablation. In 2 of these patients, programmed stimulation after 7 and 10 weeks, respectively, induced a new VT in 1 patient and a VT similar to 1 of 3 previously observed VTs in the other patient. Both underwent an additional ablation procedure with no VT inducible before discharge. The third patient who was seen with incessant VT and had VT modified at the initial ablation session had a new morphology of VT occur spontaneously 6 months after amiodarone withdrawal. After repeat ablation, this VT was no longer inducible, but other faster VTs that did not allow mapping remained inducible.

Early after the final ablation procedure, 21 patients (40%) had no spontaneous or inducible sustained monomorphic VT. These patients had a total of 70 monomorphic VTs previously inducible. In 16 (31%) patients VT was inducible but modified and did not recur spontaneously before hospital discharge. The cycle length of the slowest inducible VT had shortened by 97 ms, from 425±15 to 328±18 ms. A total of 60 VTs had been previously inducible in these patients. Further ablation attempts were not performed because VT was poorly tolerated in 11 patients and because no endocardial target sites could be identified in 5 patients.

In 15 patients (29%), ablation was judged to be ineffective. In 8 patients (15%) VT recurred in the hospital; 5 of these had persistently inducible VT at the end of the ablation procedure. In 7 patients (13%), VT did not recur in the hospital but a VT similar to that initiated before ablation remained inducible at the last electrophysiology study. Further ablation was not attempted in these 15 patients because inducible VTs were poorly tolerated in the electrophysiology laboratory in 6 patients, no target sites could be identified in 5 patients, previously frequent or incessant VT was now controlled with drug therapy in 3 patients, and 1 patient died, as noted above.

Survival and Ventricular Tachycardia Recurrences
After ablation, antiarrhythmic drugs continued to be administered to 32 (63%) of 51 patients; amiodarone in 30 (59%) patients and sotalol in 2 (4%) patients. Implantable defibrillators were present in 23 (45%) patients, 7 of which were implanted after ablation. Among the 23 patients with implantable defibrillators 14 also continued to be treated with antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation (2 patients) or inducible VT after ablation. The mean follow-up after the final ablation session was 18±15 months (range 0 to 59 months).

Ten patients died (19%): 1 was procedure related, 2 were in the hospital from VT that was not controlled by ablation, 5 died of heart failure, and 1 died of end-stage liver disease. One patient died suddenly after 15 months. This patient had no VT inducible before discharge; amiodarone (200 mg/d) had been started 6 months later for atrial fibrillation. Three patients underwent cardiac transplantation, all had severe ventricular dysfunction before ablation (left ventricular ejection fractions of 0.15, 0.18, and 0.27, respectively) and unsuccessful ablations with multiple VT recurrences afterward. Of the 5 patients who died of congestive heart failure, all had symptomatic heart failure before ablation. Left ventricular ejection fraction was <0.20 in 3 patients, 2 of whom had class IV symptoms before ablation. In the 2 patients with better left ventricular ejection fractions (0.3 and 0.4, respectively), death occurred after 4.2 and 2.4 years of follow-up and followed coronary artery bypass surgery and aneurysmectomy in 1 patient. Three-year survival for all 52 patients was 70±10% (Figure 2ADown).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Survival after catheter ablation (A) and cumulative arrhythmia recurrences (B), including 1 sudden death, are shown for all 52 patients. Number of patients at each point in time is shown above the abscissa. VT indicates ventricular tachycardia.

Sustained VT that was not fatal recurred in 16 (31%) patients either in the hospital before discharge (7 patients) or during follow-up (9 patients). For all 52 patients, the 3-year risk of recurrent ventricular arrhythmia, including the 1 sudden death, was 33±7% (Figure 2BUp). Thus 67% of patients remained free of VT during follow-up.

When ablation was not successful, it was evident soon after the procedures. In 76% of patients with recurrences, the first VT recurrence occurred within 4 weeks of ablation. For the patients who did not recur spontaneously in the hospital after ablation, predischarge electrophysiologic testing was predictive of outcome (TableUp). Arrhythmia recurrences (including 1 sudden death) occurred in 3 of 19 (16%) patients without inducible VT, 2 of 16 (13%) patients in whom inducible arrhythmias were modified, and 5 of 6 (83%) patients in whom inducible VT was not changed (P=0.001).

Patients with spontaneous arrhythmia recurrences (VT or sudden death) are compared with those remaining free of recurrences in the TableUp. Patients with recurrent arrhythmias had worse ventricular function. The number of morphologies of inducible VT was not significantly different between the groups. Prior antiarrhythmic drug failure was associated with a greater risk of arrhythmia recurrence (TableUp and Figure 3Down). Of the 11 patients who had not failed antiarrhythmic drugs, 10 (91%) were free of VT recurrences during follow-up. However, 3 were treated with amiodarone (2 patients) or sotalol (1 patient) for inducible modified VT at follow-up study (1 patient) or at the referring physician's request (2 patients). One of these patients received an implanted defibrillator for modified but inducible VT. Patients with recurrences had slower VTs inducible at initial study, probably because of frequent amiodarone use before ablation in this group. By multivariate logistic regression, failed therapy with amiodarone (odds ratio 5.9, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 33) and a slowest VT cycle length >405 ms (odds ratio 4.0, 95% confidence intervals 0.97 to 16.5) were independent predictors of arrhythmia recurrence. When failed amiodarone therapy was excluded from the model, left ventricular ejection fraction <0.34 was a predictor of recurrences with borderline statistical significance (odds ratio 3.3, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 13) independent of VT cycle length (odds ratio 5.14, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 21).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Arrhythmia recurrences are shown for the 41 patients who had previously failed antiarrhythmic therapy (dashed line) and 11 patients who had not previously failed antiarrhythmic drug therapy (solid line). Number of patients remaining at each point in time is shown below the curves.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Ablation of VT after myocardial infarction is often more difficult than ablation of supraventricular tachycardia. The presence of multiple morphologies of inducible monomorphic VT is a frequent complicating factor. Recent studies of RF catheter ablation for postinfarct VT have generally attempted to exclude patients with more than 1 morphology of VT, offering the procedure to a small minority of patients with sustained monomorphic VT.8 9 10 Our study, as well as a recent study by Rothman and coworkers16 suggests that RF catheter ablation that targets any stable VT may be useful even if multiple VTs are inducible. Initially all of our patients had failed antiarrhythmic drug therapy because of spontaneous recurrences of VT. Later in the study, for 11 patients, drug failure was not required. Despite the predominance of patients with drug-refractory VT and multiple morphologies of VT, two thirds were rendered free of recurrent VT during follow-up with a low incidence of complications. When ablation was not successful, 76% of patients had recurrent VT within 4 weeks. However, these procedures are technically challenging, the procedure times are relatively long, and many patients required multiple procedures.

This study, although not randomized or controlled, provides useful information regarding management of patients after ablation. Modification of the reentry substrate was a common outcome of ablation. Modification was defined as persistence of inducible VT that was clearly different than the previously inducible tachycardias. These VTs were usually faster and often not tolerated sufficiently to allow mapping. On average, the VT cycle length shortened by {approx}100 ms, which suggests that ablation damaged a portion of the slowly conducting tissue in the reentry circuit, such that the remaining circuits had faster revolution times. We cannot be certain that these faster VTs were absent before ablation, however, because slower tachycardias are usually induced more easily and earlier in the stimulation protocol. In any case, modification was associated with a favorable outcome and relatively low risk of arrhythmia recurrence. However, these patients generally continued to receive amiodarone or received an implantable defibrillator. Defibrillator implantation is a reasonable strategy, supported by the study of Rothman and coworkers, who observed VT recurrences in 9 of 19 patients who had a "clinical" VT ablated but other VTs still inducible.16

Management of the patient who is receiving amiodarone at the time of ablation is a particularly difficult issue. Even if VT is not inducible after ablation, amiodarone may be suppressing other VTs. Because of the long half-life of elimination of the drug, withdrawal exposes the patient to a risk of arrhythmia recurrence long after hospital discharge. Therefore we continued amiodarone unless an implantable defibrillator was present or amiodarone toxicity precluded continued therapy. Our experience in 3 patients in whom amiodarone was discontinued is instructive. All had inducible or spontaneous VT at follow-up electrophysiologic studies 7 to 42 weeks later. However, all had successful ablation of these VTs and remained free of VT during subsequent follow-up. For patients who had not previously failed antiarrhythmic drug therapy, catheter ablation was quite effective: 91% were free of arrhythmia recurrences during follow-up. This was a select group of patients, however, who had hemodynamically tolerated VT without cardiac arrest in the absence of antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

In targeting multiple VTs, we probably applied ablation to larger regions of the infarct, accounting for the greater number of RF applications compared with previous series. In prior reports, surgical ablation of VT removed 8 cm2 to >40 cm2 of subendocardial tissue.17 Saksena and coworkers18 observed that focal intraoperative laser ablation of 2 to 25 cm2 was required for interruption of VT. We performed ablation with conventional RF catheters, which create lesions that are typically 5 to 10 mm in diameter, and often substantially smaller because of vagaries of tissue contact, electrode-tissue orientation, and cooling from the surrounding blood pool.14 15 With present RF systems it is likely that multiple RF applications are required to remotely approach the effect achieved with surgery. This raises important safety concerns because damage to contracting myocardium could further depress ventricular function. We are careful to confine RF applications to regions that have abnormal electrograms, with the intention of avoiding damage to contractile muscle. In our single patient who died of myocardial infarction after ablation, the RF lesions were confined to the infarct region.15 Although we did not observe clinical exacerbations of heart failure after ablation, mild alterations may have been difficult to appreciate in patients with frequent episodes of VT. The 10% incidence of death from heart failure during follow-up is not unexpected in this patient population and is similar to that observed by Gonska and coworkers,9 who targeted 1 VT for ablation. Assessment of the impact of ablation on left ventricular function will be important in future studies.

Limitations
Antiarrhythmic drug management after ablation is a difficult issue, and many of our patients continued to receive amiodarone during follow-up. Continued amiodarone therapy is unlikely to explain the long-term success after ablation because this drug previously failed to prevent spontaneous VT. Our approach to mapping limited our ability to characterize all of the potential ventricular reentry circuits and to determine how frequently multiple VTs originated from common or separate regions. Ablation with enlargement of the initial lesion was performed at 1 of the initial reentry circuit sites identified, regardless of whether that VT had been previously identified as occurring spontaneously or whether other VTs had been mapped. Ablation at 1 region often appeared to abolish several VTs, as has been reported by others.19 20 For example, 1 patient had several episodes of VT with a right bundle-branch block configuration. Programmed electrical stimulation repeatedly induced a VT with a left bundle-branch block configuration. After ablation of this VT, only rapid "ventricular flutter" was provokable. During follow-up of 19 months there have been no arrhythmia recurrences. Thus it is likely that ablation at 1 region abolished more than 1 VT, as has been observed by others.19 20

We routinely used current strengths of up to 10 mA at 9 ms pulse width, for pacing to entrain VT and to assess capture after ablation as an indication that ablation had caused tissue damage. This current strength was arbitrarily selected; it is possible that greater mapping specificity would be observed by using lower stimulus strengths, but this is not known.

Clinical Implications
RF catheter ablation of VT after myocardial infarction abolishes spontaneous episodes of VT in two thirds of patients regardless of the presence of multiple morphologies of inducible VT. It provides excellent palliation for many patients who have repeated episodes of spontaneous VT. The procedure is, however, technically demanding. Further studies are justified to determine how catheter ablation should fit into the therapeutic strategy for patients with hemodynamically tolerated VT.


*    Footnotes
 
Presented in part at the 69th Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association, New Orleans, La, November 13–16, 1996, and previously published in abstract form (Circulation. 1994;94[suppl I]:I-22).

Received December 19, 1997; revision received March 20, 1998; accepted March 26, 1998.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. de Bakker JCT, van Capelle FJL, Janse MJ, van Hemel NM, Hauer RNW, Defauw J, Vermeulen F, de Wekker P. Macroreentry in the infarcted human heart: mechanism of ventricular tachycardias with a focal activation pattern. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:1005–1014.[Abstract]
  2. Kaltenbrunner W, Cardinal R, Dubuc M, Shenasa M, Nadeau R, Tremblay G, Vermeulen M, Savard P, Page PL. Epicardial and endocardial mapping of ventricular tachycardia in patients with myocardial infarction: is the origin of the tachycardia always subendocardially localized? Circulation. 1991;84:1058–1071.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Wilber DJ, Davis MJ, Rosenbaum M, Ruskin JN, Garan H. Incidence and determinants of multiple morphologically distinct sustained ventricular tachycardias. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;10:583–591.[Abstract]
  4. Waspe LE, Brodman R, Kim SG, Matos JA, Johnston DR, Scavin GM, Fisher JD. Activation mapping in patients with coronary artery disease with multiple ventricular tachycardia configurations: occurrence and therapeutic implications of widely separate apparent sites of origin. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985;5:1075–1086.[Abstract]
  5. Mitrani RD, Biblo LA, Carlson MD, Gatzoylis KA, Henthorn RW, Waldo AL. Multiple monomorphic ventricular tachycardia configurations predict failure of antiarrhythmic drug therapy guided by electrophysiologic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1117–1122.[Abstract]
  6. Miller JM, Kienzle M, Harken AH, Josephson ME. Subendocardial resection for ventricular tachycardia: predictors of surgical success. Circulation. 1984;70:624–631.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Stevenson WG, Khan H, Sager P, Saxon LA, Middlekauff HR, Natterson PD, Wiener I. Identification of reentry circuit sites during catheter mapping and radiofrequency ablation of ventricular tachycardia late after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1993;88:1647–1670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Morady F, Harvey M, Kalbfleisch SJ, El-Atassi R, Calkins H, Langberg JJ. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1993;87:363–372.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Gonska D-B, Cao K, Schaumann A, Dorszewski A, von zur Muhlen F, Kreuzer H. Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in 136 patients with coronary artery disease: results and long-term follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:1506–1514.[Abstract]
  10. Kim YH, Sosa-Suarez G, Trouton TG, O'Nunain SS, Osswald S, McGovern BA, Ruskin JN, Garan H. Treatment of ventricular tachycardia by transcatheter radiofrequency ablation in patients with ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 1994;89:1094–1102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Stevenson WG, Friedman PL, Sager PT, Saxon LA, Kocovic D, Harada T, Wiener I, Khan H. Exploring postinfarction reentrant ventricular tachycardia with entrainment mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:1180–1189.[Abstract]
  12. Stevenson WG, Sager PT, Natterson PD, Saxon LA, Middlekauff HR, Wiener I. Relation of pace mapping QRS configuration and conduction delay to ventricular tachycardia reentry circuits in human infarct scars. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:481–488.[Abstract]
  13. Saxon LA, Stevenson WG, Fonorow GC, Middlekauff HR, Yeatman LA, Sherman CT, Child JS. Transesophageal echocardiography during radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:658–661.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Harvey M, Kim YN, Cousa J, El-Atassi R, Morady F, Calkins H, Landgberg JJ. Impedance monitoring during radiofrequency catheter ablation in humans. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992;15:22–27.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Bartlett TG, Mitchell R, Friedman PL, Stevenson WG. Histologic evolution of radiofrequency lesions in an old human myocardial infarct causing ventricular tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1995;6:625–629.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Rothman SA, Hsia HH, Cossú SF, Chmielewski IL, Buxton AE, Miller JM. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of postinfarction ventricular tachycardia: long-term success and the significance of inducible nonclinical arrhythmias. Circulation. 1997;96:3499–3508.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Krafchek J, Lawrie GM, Roberts R, Magro SA, Wyndham CRC. Surgical ablation of ventricular tachycardia: improved results with a map-directed regional approach. Circulation. 1986;73:1239–1247.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Saksena S, Gielchinsky I, Tullo NG. Argon laser ablation of malignant ventricular tachycardia associated with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:1298–1304.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Fitzgerald DM, Friday KJ, Yeung-Lai-Wah JA, Bowman AJ, Lazzara R, Jackman WM. Myocardial regions of slow conduction participating in the reentrant circuit of multiple ventricular tachycardias: report on ten patients. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1991;2:193–206.
  20. Wilber DJ, Kopp DE, Glascock DN, Kinder CA, Kall JG. Catheter ablation of the mitral isthmus for ventricular tachycardia associated with inferior infarction. Circulation. 1995;92:3481–3489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
J. J. Blanc, J. Almendral, M. Brignole, M. Fatemi, K. Gjesdal, E. Gonzalez-Torrecilla, P. Kulakowski, G. Y.H. Lip, D. Shah, C. Wolpert, et al.
Consensus document on antithrombotic therapy in the setting of electrophysiological procedures
Europace, May 1, 2008; 10(5): 513 - 527.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
T. Dickfeld, P. Lei, V. Dilsizian, J. Jeudy, J. Dong, A. Voudouris, R. Peters, M. Saba, R. Shekhar, and S. Shorofsky
Integration of Three-Dimensional Scar Maps for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation With Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., January 1, 2008; 1(1): 73 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
H. Ashikaga, T. Sasano, J. Dong, M. M. Zviman, R. Evers, B. Hopenfeld, V. Castro, R. H. Helm, T. Dickfeld, S. Nazarian, et al.
Magnetic Resonance Based Anatomical Analysis of Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia: Implications for Catheter Ablation
Circ. Res., October 26, 2007; 101(9): 939 - 947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. J. Callans
Patients With Hemodynamically Tolerated Ventricular Tachycardia Require Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
Circulation, September 4, 2007; 116(10): 1196 - 1203.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Almendral and M. E. Josephson
All Patients With Hemodynamically Tolerated Postinfarction Ventricular Tachycardia Do Not Require an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator
Circulation, September 4, 2007; 116(10): 1204 - 1212.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. U. Klemm, R. Ventura, D. Steven, C. Johnsen, T. Rostock, B. Lutomsky, T. Risius, T. Meinertz, and S. Willems
Catheter Ablation of Multiple Ventricular Tachycardias After Myocardial Infarction Guided by Combined Contact and Noncontact Mapping
Circulation, May 29, 2007; 115(21): 2697 - 2704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
M C S Hall and D M Todd
Modern management of arrhythmias
Postgrad. Med. J., February 1, 2006; 82(964): 117 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. U. Klein and S. Reek
"The Older the Broader": Electrogram Characteristics Help Identify the Critical Isthmus During Catheter Ablation of Postinfarct Ventricular Tachycardia
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 16, 2005; 46(4): 675 - 677.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S.-m. Hwang, T. Y. Kim, and K. J. Lee
From The Cover: Complex-periodic spiral waves in confluent cardiac cell cultures induced by localized inhomogeneities
PNAS, July 19, 2005; 102(29): 10363 - 10368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
K. A. Gatzoulis, G. K. Andrikopoulos, T. Apostolopoulos, E. Sotiropoulos, G. Zervopoulos, J. Antoniou, S. Brili, and C. I. Stefanadis
Electrical storm is an independent predictor of adverse long-term outcome in the era of implantable defibrillator therapy
Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(2): 184 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. Szumowski, P. Sanders, F. Walczak, M. Hocini, P. Jais, R. Kepski, E. Szufladowicz, P. Urbanek, P. Derejko, R. Bodalski, et al.
Mapping and ablation of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 19, 2004; 44(8): 1700 - 1706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Della Bella, S. Riva, G. Fassini, F. Giraldi, M. Berti, C. Klersy, and N. Trevisi
Incidence and significance of pleomorphism in patients with postmyocardial infarction ventricular tachycardia: Acute and long-term outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2004; 25(13): 1127 - 1138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Berruezo, L. Mont, S. Nava, E. Chueca, E. Bartholomay, and J. Brugada
Electrocardiographic Recognition of the Epicardial Origin of Ventricular Tachycardias
Circulation, April 20, 2004; 109(15): 1842 - 1847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Tung, K. Soejima, W. H. Maisel, M. Suzuki, L. Epstein, and W. G. Stevenson
Recognition of far-field electrograms during entrainment mapping of ventricular tachycardia
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 2, 2003; 42(1): 110 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
V. Y. Reddy, P. Neuzil, M. Taborsky, and J. N. Ruskin
Short-term results of substrate mapping and radiofrequency ablation of ischemic ventricular tachycardia using a saline-irrigated catheter
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 18, 2003; 41(12): 2228 - 2236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Brugada, A. Berruezo, A. Cuesta, J. Osca, E. Chueca, X. Fosch, L. Wayar, and L. Mont
Nonsurgical transthoracic epicardial radiofrequency ablation: An alternative in incessant ventricular tachycardia
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 4, 2003; 41(11): 2036 - 2043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
M Zanobini, F. Rossi, A. Bertera, S. Sandano, C. Costa, R. Fabrizi, S. Viola, A. Annoni, F. Alamanni, and P. Biglioli
Cardiopulmonary support during electrophysiological procedures for ventricular tachycardias not haemodynamically tolerated
Perfusion, March 1, 2003; 18(2): 79 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Della Bella and N. Trevisi
Catheter ablation: is it good for all postinfarction ventricular tachycardias?
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2002; 23(21): 1645 - 1647.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
D. O'Donnell, J.P. Bourke, R. Anilkumar, E. Simeonidou, and S.S. Furniss
Radiofrequency ablation for post infarction ventricular tachycardia. Report of a single centre experience of 112 cases
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2002; 23(21): 1699 - 1705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
H. Kottkamp and G. Hindricks
Catheter ablation of untolerated ventricular tachycardia--a new front line
Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2002; 23(9): 697 - 699.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
R.J. Schilling
Can catheter ablation cure post-infarction ventricular tachycardia?
Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2002; 23(5): 352 - 354.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Della Bella, R. De Ponti, J.A.S. Uriarte, C. Tondo, C. Klersy, C. Carbucicchio, C. Storti, S. Riva, and M. Longobardi
Catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs for haemodynamically tolerated post-infarction ventricular tachycardia. Long-term outcome in relation to acute electrophysiological findings
Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2002; 23(5): 414 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. J. Ciaccio, C. Costeas, J. Coromilas, and A. L. Wit
Static Relationship of Cycle Length to Reentrant Circuit Geometry
Circulation, October 16, 2001; 104(16): 1946 - 1951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. Soejima, M. Suzuki, W. H. Maisel, C. B. Brunckhorst, E. Delacretaz, L. Blier, S. Tung, H. Khan, and W. G. Stevenson
Catheter Ablation in Patients With Multiple and Unstable Ventricular Tachycardias After Myocardial Infarction: Short Ablation Lines Guided by Reentry Circuit Isthmuses and Sinus Rhythm Mapping
Circulation, August 7, 2001; 104(6): 664 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. J. Ciaccio, A. C. Tosti, and M. M. Scheinman
Relationship Between Sinus Rhythm Activation and the Reentrant Ventricular Tachycardia Isthmus
Circulation, July 31, 2001; 104(5): 613 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]