| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 1998;98:2695-2701.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Deutsches Herzzentrum and 1. Medizinische Klinik der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Correspondence to Franz-Josef Neumann, MD, Deutsches Herzzentrum und 1. Medizinische Klinik der Technischen Universität, Lazarettstraße 36, 81636 München, Germany. E-mail neumann{at}dhm.mhn.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsIn a prospective randomized trial, patients undergoing stenting in acute myocardial infarction within 48 hours after onset of symptoms were randomly assigned to receive either standard-dose heparin or abciximab plus low-dose heparin. Immediately after the procedure and at 14-day angiographic follow-up, we assessed flow velocity in the recanalized vessel with the Doppler wire and regional wall motion by the centerline method. End points were changes in papaverine-induced peak flow velocities and in wall motion indices. We assigned 98 patients to standard heparin and 102 to abciximab. We obtained 152 paired flow measurements and 151 paired left ventricular function studies. Residual stenoses of the treated lesions did not differ between the 2 groups. Improvement of peak flow velocity (mean [95% CI]: 18.1 cm/s [13.6 to 22.6 cm/s], n=80, versus 10.4 cm/s [5.4 to 15.4 cm/s], n=72, P=0.024) and wall motion index (0.44 SD/chord [0.29 to 0.59 SD/chord], n=79 versus 0.15 SD/chord [0.00 to 0.30 SD/chord], n=72, P=0.007) was significantly greater in patients assigned to abciximab than in those on heparin alone. At follow-up, the abciximab group had a higher global left ventricular ejection fraction than the heparin group (62% [59% to 65%] versus 56% [53% to 59%], P=0.003).
ConclusionsAbciximab had important effects beyond the maintenance of large-vessel patency. It improved the recovery of microvascular perfusion and concomitantly enhanced the recovery of contractile function in the area at risk.
Key Words: myocardial infarction stents glycoproteins blood flow ventricles
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The adequacy of reperfusion in AMI, however, depends not only on persistent patency of the infarct-related artery but also on the integrity of the distal circulation. At the microcirculatory level, distal embolization of platelet aggregates formed at the treated plaque,5 release of vasoconstrictive platelet mediators,6 and/or vascular reperfusion injury due to cardiac inflammatory responses may compromise the recovery of perfusion.7 To this end, it has been shown that the pattern of reperfusion after recanalization of the infarct-related artery with stent placement varies considerably between patients.8 In most patients, coronary flow reserve improves within the next 2 weeks, whereas in others, maximal coronary flow falls below the level achieved initially.8 Perfusion patterns are closely linked to the recovery of contraction in the infarct region and may thus be a target for pharmacological modification.8 9
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade may not only maintain patency of the recanalized vessel but also prevent embolization of platelet aggregates into the distal circulation.10 11 In this prospective randomized trial on patients with AMI, we investigated microvascular and contractile recovery of the infarct region after revascularization with stent placement and compared the effect of peri-interventional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade by abciximab with that of standard heparin therapy. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that compared with conventional treatment, abciximab improves the recovery of papaverine-induced coronary peak flow velocity and of wall motion in the infarct area within 14 days after successful stent placement in the infarct-related artery.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 mm in
2 contiguous leads, (4) elevation in creatine
kinase to
3 times the upper limit of normal with a concomitant rise
in MB isoenzyme, and (5) coronary artery occlusion with
angiographic appearance of fresh thrombus. We recruited patients who
met criteria 1 and 2 plus at least 1 of criteria 3 through 5. Exclusion
criteria were inability to give informed consent, history of vasculitis
or chronic steroid treatment, and contraindications to 1 of the study
drugs. All eligible patients who gave written informed consent were
randomized by means of sealed envelopes. Patients, but not physicians,
were blinded to the assignment of treatment. The study was carried out
according to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by our
institutional ethics committee.
Study Protocol
Before catheterization, all patients received
heparin 5000 U and aspirin 500 mg IV. Once the decision was made for
stent placement, patients were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment regimens.
Patients assigned to treatment with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa
receptor blockade received a bolus of abciximab 0.25 mg/kg body wt,
followed by continuous infusion of 10 µg/min for 12 hours, plus an
additional dose of heparin 25 000 U intra-arterially. In
patients assigned to usual care, we administered heparin 10 000 U
intra-arterially, followed by intravenous
heparin infusion 1000 U/h for the first 12 hours after sheath removal.
Immediately after reestablishing antegrade flow, we gave an
intracoronary bolus dose of 0.2 mg
nitroglycerin in both groups. Stent placement was
performed as described previously.12 We used 5
different types of slotted-tube stents, which were evenly distributed
between the study groups (Palmaz-Schatz, Multilink, Nir, Pura A, and
InflowDynamics). If, after stent placement, residual thrombus remained
and caused impairment of flow (TIMI grade
2) or lumen narrowing of
>50%, operators were allowed to administer abciximab in the
usual-care group. In both groups, postinterventional antithrombotic
therapy consisted of ticlopidine 250 mg BID for 4 weeks and aspirin 100
mg BID throughout the study.
Immediately after completion of the intervention, coronary flow velocities in the stented segment were measured with the Doppler FloWire and analyzed by the FloMap system (Cardiometrics) as described previously.8 We positioned the tip of the Doppler wire at the proximal end of the stented segment to ensure a reproducible sampling site that is not subject to vasomotor changes. Doppler flow velocity spectra were analyzed on-line to determine time-averaged peak velocity. We determined basal and peak coronary flow velocities after intracoronary bolus doses of papaverine (10 mg for the right and 12 mg for the left coronary artery). Thereafter, we performed single-plane left ventriculography in the 30° right anterior oblique view. At 14±1 days after the initial intervention, coronary and left ventricular (LV) angiography and flow velocity measurements were repeated. When indicated, repeat PTCA was performed before the second flow velocity measurement.
Quantitative Angiography
We used nonionic contrast medium (ioversol) in all patients.
Images of coronary and LV angiograms (Hicor, Siemens) were
stored on compact disks and analyzed off-line (MEDIS Medical
Imaging Systems) by operators unaware of the study groups to which the
patients were assigned.8 12 Global LV ejection
fraction was determined by the area-length method. To quantify regional
LV wall motion, we used the centerline
method.8 13 Within the region of interest, the
mean wall motion of the abnormally contracting (
-1 SD from
normal) contiguous chords was determined to yield the wall motion index
of that region.8 13 This result was expressed in
SD (from normal) per chord (SD/chord). In addition, we determined the
number of chords within the region of interest showing hypokinesis
(
-1 SD).
Study End Points and Measures of Clinical Outcome
The differences in papaverine-induced coronary flow
velocity and in wall motion index between the initial study and 14-day
follow-up were primary end points. In addition, we analyzed
basal flow velocities, coronary flow reserve (ratio of peak
flow velocity and basal flow velocity), number of chords with
hypokinesis, and global LV ejection fraction. Secondary end point was
the clinical outcome during 30-day follow-up.
Statistical Analysis
All data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.
Discrete variables, expressed as counts, were tested by Fisher's
exact test. Results of continuous variables, reported as mean±SD
or as mean (95% CI), were tested by the t test for paired
and unpaired samples, as appropriate. The effect of treatment and of
other covariables on changes in coronary flow velocity or
wall motion index was also assessed by stepwise multiple linear
regression analysis. We used the SPSS 7.5 software package for
all statistical analyses. A value of P<0.05 in the
2-tailed test was regarded as significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
In 4 patients, the intervention was unsuccessful for technical reasons. These were failure to recanalize the infarct-related occlusion and inability to cover a large residual dissection in 1 patient of each group. After stent placement in the usual-care group, large residual thrombi remained in 10 patients and were associated with TIMI grade 2 flow in 4 patients. In all patients with large residual thrombi, we administered abciximab secondarily, which dissolved the clots in 8 patients. Substantial residual thrombi or TIMI grade 2 flow was not encountered in any of the patients with successful stent placement assigned to abciximab. In the 4 patients with unsuccessful procedures and in 13 patients with hemodynamic instability, we did not perform flow velocity measurements and LV angiography.
Twelve patients with successful stent placement did not undergo repeat angiography at 14 days. This was because of death in 6 patients (see below), coronary artery bypass graft surgery for left main stenosis after successful recanalization of an occluded right coronary artery in 1 patient assigned to abciximab, severe peripheral vascular disease in 1 patient, and patient refusal after an uneventful clinical course in 4 patients.
We obtained paired coronary flow velocity measurements in
152 patients and paired LV angiographies in 151 patients. The causes
for missing studies are summarized in Table 2
. Between the 2 groups, there were no
significant differences in the rate of paired flow velocity
measurements or LV angiograms (P>0.5), nor was the
distribution of causes for missing studies different between the 2
groups (P>0.6).
|
Coronary Flow Velocities in the Infarct-Related
Artery
At the initial study, both treatment groups had similar
basal and peak flow velocities in the recanalized coronary
artery (Table 3
). Within 14 days, peak
flow velocities increased significantly in both treatment groups and
basal flow velocity increased significantly in the abciximab group
(Figure 1
). The increase in peak flow
velocity in patients assigned to abciximab was significantly larger
than that in patients assigned to usual care (Figure 1
). Thus, at
follow-up, peak flow velocities in the abciximab group were
significantly higher than those in the usual-care group, and basal flow
velocities were higher by trend (Table 3
). In both treatment groups, we
found significant increases in coronary flow reserve in the
infarct-related artery (Table 3
). These were not affected by the
treatment regimen, however, and there were no significant differences
in coronary flow reserve between the abciximab group and the
usual-care group either at the initial study or at follow-up.
|
|
With regard to potential determinants of coronary flow
velocity, the 2 treatment groups were homogeneous with
respect to vessel size, minimal luminal diameter, and residual
stenosis of the treated segment both in the initial study and
at follow-up (Table 3
). The same held true for arterial
blood pressure and pulse rate during the flow velocity measurements as
well as LV end-diastolic pressures (Table 3
). Multiple
linear regression analysis revealed assignment to treatment
with abciximab as the single independent predictor (P=0.026)
for the increase in peak flow velocity. Apart from the assigned
treatment, the model included baseline demographic, clinical, and
angiographic characteristics (Table 1
) as well as
hemodynamic and quantitative angiographic data (Table 3
).
Regional and Global LV Function
Improvement of regional LV function within the first 2
weeks, assessed by wall motion index or number of chords with
hypokinesis, was significantly greater in patients assigned to
abciximab than in those assigned to usual care (Figure 2
). By multiple linear regression
analysis with the same independent variables as in the
model for peak flow velocity (see above), the assigned treatment was a
significant (P=0.017) independent predictor for the increase
in wall motion index. The only other independent predictor was TIMI
flow grade before the intervention (P=0.007).
|
Immediately after recanalization of the
infarct-related artery, global and regional LV function of the infarct
zone were similar in both treatment groups (Table 4
). At follow-up, the infarct-related
wall motion abnormalities were significantly less in the abciximab
group than in the usual-care group (Table 4
). Concordant changes were
found in global LV ejection fraction (Table 4
).
|
We found a significant correlation between changes in peak flow velocity and changes in wall motion index (r=0.20, P=0.022). A similar trend was observed for the relation of changes in peak flow velocity to changes in LV ejection fraction (r=0.15, P=0.09).
Clinical Outcome
Although angiography at 14 days did not detect any
stent vessel occlusions, target lesion reintervention with
additional stent placement had to be performed in 4 patients of
the control group. During 30-day follow-up, 2 patients of the abciximab
group and 9 patients of the control group had adverse cardiac events
(OR [95% CI]: OR, 0.20 [0.04 to 0.94], P=0.031),
including death (2 versus 4; OR, 0.47 [0.08 to 2.93],
P=0.44), nonlethal reinfarction (0 versus 1; OR, 0 [0 to
18.3], P=0.49), and target lesion reintervention (0 versus
4; OR, 0 [0 to 1.05], P=0.056). Three patients assigned to
abciximab and 6 patients assigned to usual-care treatment needed blood
transfusions for bleeding at the access site (OR, 0.47 [0.11 to
1.91], P=0.32). Otherwise, there were no major bleeding
complications.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recovery of Coronary Flow to the Area at Risk
In patients assigned to abciximab, the increase in peak flow
velocity at the site of recanalization during the
first 2 weeks after the intervention was almost twice that in patients
assigned to usual care. This differential effect of the 2 treatment
regimens could not be attributed to differences in patency of the
infarct-related vessel. The 2 groups were homogeneous with
respect to vessel diameter and residual stenosis of the treated
lesion. Similarly, there were no inequalities in
hemodynamic conditions. These findings strongly suggest
a microvascular mechanism for the larger increase in peak flow velocity
after administration of abciximab compared with usual care. We did not
directly measure myocardial blood flow in the infarct region. However,
the stent ensured exact positioning and constant vessel diameters at
the sample volume of the Doppler wire in both flow velocity
studies. The changes in peak flow velocity thus may be taken as a
reliable indicator of changes in maximal myocardial blood flow in the
infarct region.
In the abciximab group, we also found a significant increase in basal flow velocity at the site of revascularization that was not observed in the usual-care group. Accordingly, coronary flow reserves at follow-up were not significantly different between the 2 treatment groups. Previous studies have shown that an increase in the number of functional vascular segments contributes substantially to the recovery of myocardial blood flow during reperfusion in AMI.8 14 The differential effect of our 2 treatment regimens may thus be explained by an increased number of functional vascular segments after abciximab treatment compared with usual care, rather than by an increase in flow reserve of the individual segments.
The beneficial effect of abciximab on recovery of vascular function in the infarct area can be explained by blockade of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor, which prevents embolization of platelet aggregates as well as platelet adhesion to the injured endothelium.11 15 In addition, blockade of the vitronectin receptor, another ß3-integrin, and of ß2-integrins, such as Mac-1 on leukocytes, may contribute by inhibition of the interaction of leukocytes with the reperfused microvasculature.16 Such interaction induces procoagulant and cytotoxic inflammatory responses.17 18
Recovery of Contraction in the Area at Risk
Previous clinical studies revealed a close relation between
recovery of perfusion and recovery of contraction in the infarct
region.8 9 14 Supporting a functional impact of
our findings on coronary flow velocity, we obtained a
significant correlation between the recovery of peak flow velocity and
the improvement of wall motion index. Most importantly, both the wall
motion index and the number of chords with hypokinesis indicated
improved recovery of LV function in the infarct area in patients
assigned to abciximab compared with usual care. Notably, these changes
translate into a higher global LV ejection fraction at follow-up in the
abciximab group. These findings underscore the important impact that
peri-interventional treatment with abciximab has on the recovery of
wall motion in the infarct region.
Clinical Relevance
We investigated the effect of abciximab in a cohort that
comprised the entire spectrum of patients with AMI referred to a
tertiary-care hospital within 48 hours after onset of pain. Thus, apart
from patients with Q-wave AMI within the first 12 hours, our study
included patients with nonQ-wave AMI, those with persistent angina
for >12 hours, and those with failed thrombolysis.
Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that the beneficial
effect of abciximab was independent of these clinical covariables.
Abciximab thus improved the recovery of coronary flow and
regional LV function in a very broad spectrum of patients with AMI.
Although our study was not sufficiently powered to address the differential effect of the treatment regimens on clinical outcome, adverse cardiac events were significantly fewer in the abciximab group than in the usual-care group. This beneficial effect of abciximab is consistent with the results of the recently published EPISTENT study.19 In addition, our studies of contractile function strongly support the administration of abciximab in patients undergoing stent placement in AMI.
Methodological Considerations and Limitations of the Study
In accordance with our preceding study on recovery of
coronary flow in AMI, we used papaverine to assess
coronary vasodilator capacity.8
Papaverine has been extensively validated in the analysis of
coronary flow dynamics.20 21
Adenosine exerts a comparable vasodilator
effect,22 but it is preferred by some
investigators because of a lower risk of torsade de pointes
tachycardia. Nevertheless, we did not experience any
adverse event due to side effects of papaverine.
The fact that physicians were not blinded to the assignment of treatment represents a limitation of our study. Consequently, bias on the part of the investigators cannot be fully excluded as a factor influencing clinical treatment. However, flow velocities were ascertained by automated computerized evaluation, and the angiographic evaluations were performed by blinded operators. Bias in the assessment of the primary end points can thus be excluded. In 10 patients of the usual-care group, operators administered abciximab to deter a detrimental outcome of the intervention. These crossovers do not confound the principal trial results, because the functional and clinical outcome of the usual-care group most probably would have been even less favorable without them. In some patients, we could not obtain paired LV angiograms or flow wire measurements. This problem was similar in previous studies and affected both study groups to the same extent.13 Moreover, the distribution of the causes for missing studies was similar in both groups. Therefore, we cannot assume a relevant distortion of the trial results by missing studies.
Implications
Our study shows that in patients undergoing coronary
stent placement in AMI, peri-interventional administration of abciximab
has important beneficial effects beyond the maintenance of
large-vessel patency. Abciximab improves the recovery of
coronary perfusion at the level of the distal vascular bed and
concomitantly enhances the restoration of LV function in the infarct
area. Our findings support the concept that not only large-vessel
patency but also improvement of microvascular perfusion is an
achievable and rewarding goal in the treatment of patients with AMI.
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade offers a novel
strategy toward this goal.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received May 29, 1998; revision received August 28, 1998; accepted September 9, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Grines CL, Browne KF, Marco J, Rothbaum D, Stone GW,
O'Keefe J, Overlie P, Donohue B, Chelliah N, Timmis GC, Vlietstra RE,
Strezelecki M, Puchrowicz-Ochocki S, O'Neill WW, The Primary
Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. A comparison of
immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for
acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:673679.
3.
Zijlstra F, de Boer MJ, Hoorntje JC, Reiffers S,
Reiber JH, Suryapranata H. A comparison of immediate coronary
angioplasty with intravenous streptokinase in acute
myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:680684.
4.
Suryapranata H, van't Hof AW, Hoorntje JC, de Boer
MJ, Zijlstra F. Randomized comparison of coronary stenting with
balloon angioplasty in selected patients with acute myocardial
infarction. Circulation. 1998;97:25022505.
5. Davies MJ. A macro and micro view of coronary vascular insult in ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 1990;82(suppl II):II-38II-46.
6.
Golino P, Ashton JH, McNatt J, Glas-Greenwalt P, Yao
SK, O'Brien RA, Buja LM, Willerson JT. Simultaneous
administration of thromboxane A2- and serotonin
S2-receptor antagonists markedly enhances
thrombolysis and prevents or delays reocclusion after
tissue-type plasminogen activator in a canine
model of coronary thrombosis. Circulation. 1989;79:911919.
7.
Neumann FJ, Ott I, Gawaz M, Richardt G, Holzapfel H,
Jochum M, Schömig A. Cardiac release of cytokines and
inflammatory responses in acute myocardial infarction.
Circulation. 1995;92:748755.
8. Neumann FJ, Kosa I, Dickfeld T, Blasini R, Gawaz M, Hausleiter J, Schwaiger M, Schömig A. Recovery of myocardial perfusion in acute myocardial infarction after successful balloon angioplasty and stent placement in the infarct-related coronary artery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:12701276.[Abstract]
9.
Ito H, Maruyama A, Iwakura K, Takiuchi S, Masuyama T,
Hori M, Higashino Y, Fujii K, Minamino T. Clinical implications of the
"no reflow" phenomenon: a predictor of complications and left
ventricular remodeling in reperfused anterior wall
myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1996;93:223228.
10. Adgey AA. An overview of the results of clinical trials with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Eur Heart J. 1998;19(suppl D):D10D21.
11. Coller BS. GPIIb/IIIa antagonists: pathophysiologic and therapeutic insights from studies of c7E3 Fab. Thromb Haemost. 1997;78:730735.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Schömig A, Neumann FJ, Kastrati A, Schühlen
H, Blasini R, Hadamitzky M, Walter H, Zitzmann Roth EM, Richardt G, Alt
E, Schmitt C, Ulm K. A randomized comparison of antiplatelet and
anticoagulant therapy after the placement of coronary-artery
stents. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:10841089.
13.
Harrison JK, Califf RM, Woodlief LH, Kereiakes D,
George BS, Stack RS, Ellis SG, Lee KL, O'Neill W, Topol EJ, The TAMI
Study Group. Systolic left ventricular function
after reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction.
Analysis of determinants of improvement.
Circulation. 1993;87:15311541.
14.
Ito H, Iwakura K, Oh H, Masuyama T, Hori M, Higashino
Y, Fujii K, Minamino T, Ito H, Tomooka T, Sakai N, Yu H, Higashino Y,
Fujii K, Masuyama T, Kitabatake A, Minamino T. Temporal changes in
myocardial perfusion patterns in patients with reperfused anterior wall
myocardial infarction: their relation to myocardial viability.
Circulation. 1995;91:656662.
15.
Gawaz M, Neumann FJ, Dickfeld T, Reininger A,
Adelsberger H, Gebhardt A, Schömig A. Vitronectin
receptor (
vß3)
mediates platelet adhesion to the luminal aspect of
endothelial cells: implications for reperfusion in
acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1997;96:18091818.
16.
Simon DI, Xu H, Ortlepp S, Rogers C, Rao NK. 7E3
monoclonal antibody directed against the platelet
glycoprotein IIb/IIIa cross-reacts with the leukocyte
integrin Mac-1 and blocks adhesion to fibrinogen and ICAM-1.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:528535.
17. Fan ST, Edgington TS. Integrin regulation of leukocyte inflammatory functions: CD11b/CD18 enhancement of the tumor necrosis factor-alpha responses of monocytes. J Immunol. 1993;150:29722980.[Abstract]
18.
Murphy JF, Bordet JC, Wyler B, Rissoan MC, Chomarat P,
Defrance T, Miossec P, McGregor JL. The vitronectin
receptor (
vß3) is
implicated, in cooperation with P-selectin and platelet-activating
factor, in the adhesion of monocytes to activated
endothelial cells. Biochem J. 1994;304:537542.
19. EPISTENT Investigators. Randomised placebo-controlled and balloon-angioplasty-controlled trial to assess safety of coronary stenting with use of platelet glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa blockade. Lancet. 1998;352:8792.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Zijlstra F, Serruys PW, Hugenholtz PG. Papaverine: the ideal coronary vasodilator for investigating coronary flow reserve? A study of timing, magnitude, reproducibility, and safety of the coronary hyperemic response after intracoronary papaverine. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1986;12:298303.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Egashira K, Inou T, Hirooka Y, Yamada A, Urabe Y,
Takeshita A. Evidence of impaired endothelium-dependent
coronary vasodilatation in patients with angina pectoris and
normal coronary angiograms. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:16591664.
22. Zijlstra F, Juilliere Y, Serruys PW, Roelandt JR. Value and limitations of intracoronary adenosine for the assessment of coronary flow reserve. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1988;15:7680.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. De Luca, E. Navarese, and P. Marino Risk profile and benefits from Gp IIb-IIIa inhibitors among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty: a meta-regression analysis of randomized trials Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2009; 30(22): 2705 - 2713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Le May, G. A. Wells, C. A. Glover, D. Y. So, M. Froeschl, J.-F. Marquis, E. R. O'Brien, M. Turek, A. Thomas, M. Kass, et al. Primary Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty With and Without Eptifibatide in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Safety and Efficacy Study of Integrilin-Facilitated Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (ASSIST) Circ Cardiovasc Interv, August 1, 2009; 2(4): 330 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Mehilli, A. Kastrati, S. Schulz, S. Frungel, S. G. Nekolla, W. Moshage, F. Dotzer, K. Huber, J. Pache, J. Dirschinger, et al. Abciximab in Patients With Acute ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Clopidogrel Loading: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial Circulation, April 14, 2009; 119(14): 1933 - 1940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Fokkema, P. J. Vlaar, T. Svilaas, M. Vogelzang, D. Amo, G. F.H. Diercks, A. J.H. Suurmeijer, and F. Zijlstra Incidence and clinical consequences of distal embolization on the coronary angiogram after percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2009; 30(8): 908 - 915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ortolani, A. Marzocchi, C. Marrozzini, T. Palmerini, F. Saia, N. Taglieri, F. Baldazzi, G. Dall'Ara, P. Nardini, S. Gianstefani, et al. Long-term effectiveness of early administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa agents to real-world patients undergoing primary percutaneous interventions: results of a registry study in an ST-elevation myocardial infarction network Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2009; 30(1): 33 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Marzocchi, A. Manari, G. Piovaccari, C. Marrozzini, S. Marra, P. Magnavacchi, P. Sangiorgio, L. Marinucci, N. Taglieri, G. Gordini, et al. Randomized comparison between tirofiban and abciximab to promote complete ST-resolution in primary angioplasty: results of the facilitated angioplasty with tirofiban or abciximab (FATA) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction trial Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2008; 29(24): 2972 - 2980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. De Luca Adjunctive antithrombotic therapy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2008; 10(suppl_J): J2 - J14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Pries, H. Habazettl, G. Ambrosio, P. R. Hansen, J. C. Kaski, V. Schachinger, H. Tillmanns, G. Vassalli, I. Tritto, M. Weis, et al. A review of methods for assessment of coronary microvascular disease in both clinical and experimental settings Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 2008; 80(2): 165 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Pineda, X. Merino, S. Gispert, P. Mahia, B. Garcia, and R. Dominguez-Oronoz No-Reflow Phenomenon in Cardiac MRI: Diagnosis and Clinical Implications Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 73 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Thiele, K. Schindler, J. Friedenberger, I. Eitel, G. Furnau, E. Grebe, S. Erbs, A. Linke, S. Mobius-Winkler, D. Kivelitz, et al. Intracoronary Compared With Intravenous Bolus Abciximab Application in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Randomized Leipzig Immediate Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Abciximab IV Versus IC in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Trial Circulation, July 1, 2008; 118(1): 49 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. May, P. Seizer, and M. Gawaz Platelets: Inflammatory Firebugs of Vascular Walls Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, March 1, 2008; 28(3): s5 - s10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Svilaas, P. J. Vlaar, I. C. van der Horst, G. F.H. Diercks, B. J.G.L. de Smet, A. F.M. van den Heuvel, R. L. Anthonio, G. A. Jessurun, E.-S. Tan, A. J.H. Suurmeijer, et al. Thrombus Aspiration during Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention N. Engl. J. Med., February 7, 2008; 358(6): 557 - 567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Vetrovec Improving Reperfusion in Patients with Myocardial Infarction N. Engl. J. Med., February 7, 2008; 358(6): 634 - 637. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Maioli, F. Bellandi, M. Leoncini, A. Toso, and R. P. Dabizzi Randomized Early Versus Late Abciximab in Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Coronary Intervention (RELAx-AMI Trial) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 10, 2007; 49(14): 1517 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R J van der Schaaf, J R Timmer, J P Ottervanger, J C A Hoorntje, M-J de Boer, H Suryapranata, F Zijlstra, and J-H E Dambrink Long-term impact of multivessel disease on cause-specific mortality after ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with reperfusion therapy Heart, December 1, 2006; 92(12): 1760 - 1763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ndrepepa, A. Kastrati, J. Mehilli, F.-J. Neumann, J. ten Berg, O. Bruskina, F. Dotzer, M. Seyfarth, J. Pache, J. Dirschinger, et al. Age-Dependent Effect of Abciximab in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Circulation, November 7, 2006; 114(19): 2040 - 2046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Silva-Orrego, P. Colombo, R. Bigi, D. Gregori, A. Delgado, P. Salvade, J. Oreglia, P. Orrico, A. de Biase, G. Piccalo, et al. Thrombus Aspiration Before Primary Angioplasty Improves Myocardial Reperfusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The DEAR-MI (Dethrombosis to Enhance Acute Reperfusion in Myocardial Infarction) Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 17, 2006; 48(8): 1552 - 1559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Heer, U Zeymer, C Juenger, A K Gitt, H Wienbergen, R Zahn, M Gottwik, J Senges, and for the Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACOS) Registry I Beneficial effects of abciximab in patients with primary percutaneous intervention for acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in clinical practice Heart, October 1, 2006; 92(10): 1484 - 1489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ali, D. Cox, N. Dib, B. Brodie, D. Berman, N. Gupta, K. Browne, R. Iwaoka, M. Azrin, D. Stapleton, et al. Rheolytic Thrombectomy With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Infarct Size Reduction in Acute Myocardial Infarction: 30-Day Results From a Multicenter Randomized Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 18, 2006; 48(2): 244 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. T. Mangano, Y. Miao, I. C. Tudor, C. Dietzel, for the Investigators of the Multicenter Study of, and and the Ischemia Research and Education Foundation Post-Reperfusion Myocardial Infarction: Long-Term Survival Improvement Using Adenosine Regulation With Acadesine J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 4, 2006; 48(1): 206 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Bittl The Future of an Illusion J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 20, 2006; 47(12): 2380 - 2383. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J P S Henriques, F Zijlstra, A W J van 't Hof, M-J de Boer, J-H E Dambrink, A T M Gosselink, J C A Hoorntje, J P Ottervanger, and H Suryapranata Primary percutaneous coronary intervention versus thrombolytic treatment: long term follow up according to infarct location Heart, January 1, 2006; 92(1): 75 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E J Smith, A Mathur, and M T Rothman Recent advances in primary percutaneous intervention for acute myocardial infarction Heart, December 1, 2005; 91(12): 1533 - 1536. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ince, M. Petzsch, H. D. Kleine, H. Schmidt, T. Rehders, T. Korber, C. Schumichen, M. Freund, and C. A. Nienaber Preservation From Left Ventricular Remodeling by Front-Integrated Revascularization and Stem Cell Liberation in Evolving Acute Myocardial Infarction by Use of Granulocyte-Colony-Stimulating Factor (FIRSTLINE-AMI) Circulation, November 15, 2005; 112(20): 3097 - 3106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ndrepepa, A. Kastrati, M. Schwaiger, J. Mehilli, C. Markwardt, A. Dibra, J. Dirschinger, and A. Schomig Relationship Between Residual Blood Flow in the Infarct-Related Artery and Scintigraphic Infarct Size, Myocardial Salvage, and Functional Recovery in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2005; 46(11): 1782 - 1788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-L. Hang, C.-P. Wang, H.-K. Yip, C.-H. Yang, G. B.-F. Guo, C.-J. Wu, and S.-M. Chen Early Administration of Intracoronary Verapamil Improves Myocardial Perfusion During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Acute Myocardial Infarction Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2593 - 2598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Zeymer, R. Zahn, R. Schiele, W. Jansen, E. Girth, A. Gitt, K. Seidl, R. Schroder, S. Schneider, and J. Senges Early eptifibatide improves TIMI 3 patency before primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: results of the randomized integrilin in acute myocardial infarction (INTAMI) pilot trial Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2005; 26(19): 1971 - 1977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Thiele, L. Engelmann, K. Elsner, M. J. Kappl, W.-H. Storch, K. Rahimi, A. Hartmann, D. Pfeiffer, G. D. Kneissl, D. Schneider, et al. Comparison of pre-hospital combination-fibrinolysis plus conventional care with pre-hospital combination-fibrinolysis plus facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2005; 26(19): 1956 - 1963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ferenc and F.-J. Neumann Efficacy of primary PCI: the microvessel perspective Eur. Heart J. Suppl., October 1, 2005; 7(suppl_I): I4 - I9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Beygui and G. Montalescot The use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors into new perspectives: pre-catheterization laboratory administration Eur. Heart J. Suppl., October 1, 2005; 7(suppl_I): I10 - I14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Dudek, W. Mielecki, A. Dziewierz, J. Legutko, and J. S. Dubiel The role of thrombectomy and embolic protection devices Eur. Heart J. Suppl., October 1, 2005; 7(suppl_I): I15 - I20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Migliorini and D. Antoniucci Patient selection bias in primary percutaneous coronary intervention trials: a critical issue Eur. Heart J. Suppl., October 1, 2005; 7(suppl_I): I21 - I26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. B. Danzi, L. Mauri, and F. Sozzi Percutaneous coronary intervention and beyond for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J. Suppl., October 1, 2005; 7(suppl_K): K26 - K30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gick, N. Jander, H.-P. Bestehorn, R.-P. Kienzle, M. Ferenc, K. Werner, T. Comberg, K. Peitz, D. Zohlnhofer, V. Bassignana, et al. Randomized Evaluation of the Effects of Filter-Based Distal Protection on Myocardial Perfusion and Infarct Size After Primary Percutaneous Catheter Intervention in Myocardial Infarction With and Without ST-Segment Elevation Circulation, September 6, 2005; 112(10): 1462 - 1469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. De Luca, H. Suryapranata, R. Grimaldi, and M. Chiariello Coronary stenting and abciximab in primary angioplasty for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction QJM, September 1, 2005; 98(9): 633 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ince, M. Petzsch, H. D. Kleine, H. Eckard, T. Rehders, D. Burska, S. Kische, M. Freund, and C. A. Nienaber Prevention of Left Ventricular Remodeling With Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Final 1-year Results of the Front-Integrated Revascularization and Stem Cell Liberation in Evolving Acute Myocardial Infarction by Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (FIRSTLINE-AMI) Trial Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9_suppl): I-73 - I-80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Lefevre, E. Garcia, B. Reimers, I. Lang, C. di Mario, A. Colombo, F.-J. Neumann, M. V. Chavarri, P. Brunel, E. Grube, et al. X-Sizer for Thrombectomy in Acute Myocardial Infarction Improves ST-Segment Resolution: Results of the X-Sizer in AMI for Negligible Embolization and Optimal ST Resolution (X AMINE ST) Trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 19, 2005; 46(2): 246 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Schomig, J. Mehilli, D. Antoniucci, G. Ndrepepa, C. Markwardt, F. Di Pede, S. G. Nekolla, K. Schlotterbeck, H. Schuhlen, J. Pache, et al. Mechanical Reperfusion in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Presenting More Than 12 Hours From Symptom Onset: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, June 15, 2005; 293(23): 2865 - 2872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Sciagra, G. Parodi, A. Pupi, A. Migliorini, R. Valenti, G. Moschi, G. M. Santoro, G. Memisha, and D. Antoniucci Gated SPECT Evaluation of Outcome After Abciximab-Supported Primary Infarct Artery Stenting for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Scintigraphic Data of the Abciximab and Carbostent Evaluation (ACE) Randomized Trial J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2005; 46(5): 722 - 727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. De Luca, H. Suryapranata, G. W. Stone, D. Antoniucci, J. E. Tcheng, F.-J. Neumann, F. Van de Werf, E. M. Antman, and E. J. Topol Abciximab as Adjunctive Therapy to Reperfusion in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials JAMA, April 13, 2005; 293(14): 1759 - 1765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Iglesias-Garriz, F. Fernandez-Vazquez, A. Perez, J. Jimenez-Bonilla, C. Garrote, P. Uriarte, and C. DelaFuente Preinfarction Angina Limits Myocardial Infarction Size in Nondiabetic Patients Treated With Primary Coronary Angioplasty Chest, April 1, 2005; 127(4): 1116 - 1121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Schomig and A. Kastrati Distal Embolic Protection in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Attractive Concept But No Evidence of Benefit JAMA, March 2, 2005; 293(9): 1116 - 1118. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Barrabes, D. Garcia-Dorado, M. Mirabet, J. Inserte, L. Agullo, B. Soriano, A. Massaguer, F. Padilla, R.-M. Lidon, and J. Soler-Soler Antagonism of selectin function attenuates microvascular platelet deposition and platelet-mediated myocardial injury after transient ischemia J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 18, 2005; 45(2): 293 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gyongyosi, H. Domanovits, W. Benzer, M. Haugk, B. Heinisch, G. Sodeck, R. Hodl, G. Gaul, G. Bonner, J. Wojta, et al. Use of abciximab prior to primary angioplasty in STEMI results in early recanalization of the infarct-related artery and improved myocardial tissue reperfusion - results of the Austrian multi-centre randomized ReoPro-BRIDGING Study Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2004; 25(23): 2125 - 2133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G S Werner, U Emig, P Bahrmann, M Ferrari, and H R Figulla Recovery of impaired microvascular function in collateral dependent myocardium after recanalisation of a chronic total coronary occlusion Heart, November 1, 2004; 90(11): 1303 - 1309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ndrepepa, A. Kastrati, F.-J. Neumann, C. Schmitt, J. Mehilli, and A. Schomig Five-year outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction enrolled in a randomised trial assessing the value of abciximab during coronary artery stenting Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2004; 25(18): 1635 - 1640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Kloner and S. H. Rezkalla Cardiac protection during acute myocardial infarction: Where do we stand in 2004? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 276 - 286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Chaitman and M. J. Lim No reflow and the quest to achieve optimal perfusion during the acute phase of myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 313 - 315. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R Timmer, J. P. Ottervanger, K. Thomas, J. C.A Hoorntje, M.-J. de Boer, H. Suryapranata, F. Zijlstra, and on behalf of the Zwolle myocardial infarction stud Long-term, cause-specific mortality after myocardial infarction in diabetes Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2004; 25(11): 926 - 931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G Montalescot, H R Andersen, D Antoniucci, A Betriu, M J de Boer, L Grip, F J Neumann, and M T Rothman Recommendations on percutaneous coronary intervention for the reperfusion of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction Heart, June 1, 2004; 90(6): e37 - e37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Buttner and F.-J. Neumann Tirofiban for catheter intervention in acute myocardial infarction? Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2004; 25(10): 807 - 809. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Leoncini, F. Bellandi, R. Sciagra, M. Maioli, A. Toso, A. Coppola, S. Sestini, A. Mennuti, R. P. Dabizzi, and A. Pupi Gated SPECT Evaluation of the Relationship Between Admission Troponin I, Myocardial Salvage, and Functional Recovery in Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated by Abciximab and Early Primary Angioplasty J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2004; 45(5): 739 - 744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kastrati, J. Mehilli, S. Nekolla, H. Bollwein, S. Martinoff, J. Pache, H. Schuhlen, M. Seyfarth, M. Gawaz, F.-J. Neumann, et al. A randomized trial comparing myocardial salvage achieved by coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction considered ineligible for reperfusion therapy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 3, 2004; 43(5): 734 - 741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kastrati, J. Mehilli, K. Schlotterbeck, F. Dotzer, J. Dirschinger, C. Schmitt, S. G. Nekolla, M. Seyfarth, S. Martinoff, C. Markwardt, et al. Early Administration of Reteplase Plus Abciximab vs Abciximab Alone in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Referred for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, February 25, 2004; 291(8): 947 - 954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gawaz Role of platelets in coronary thrombosis and reperfusion of ischemic myocardium Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2004; 61(3): 498 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Galiuto Optimal therapeutic strategies in the setting of post-infarct no reflow: the need for a pathogenetic classification Heart, February 1, 2004; 90(2): 123 - 125. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Sezer, Y Nisanci, B Umman, E Yilmaz, A Olcay, F Erzengin, and O Ozsaruhan New support for clarifying the relation between ST segment resolution and microvascular function: degree of ST segment resolution correlates with the pressure derived collateral flow index Heart, February 1, 2004; 90(2): 146 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kunichika, O. Ben-Yehuda, S. Lafitte, N. Kunichika, B. Peters, and A. N. DeMaria Effects of glycoprotein iib/iiia inhibition on microvascular flow after coronary reperfusion: A quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 21, 2004; 43(2): 276 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Kloner and W. Dai Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and no-reflow J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 21, 2004; 43(2): 284 - 286. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Antoniucci, A. Rodriguez, A. Hempel, R. Valenti, A. Migliorini, F. Vigo, G. Parodi, C. Fernandez-Pereira, G. Moschi, A. Bartorelli, et al. A randomized trial comparing primary infarct artery stenting with or without abciximab in acute myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 3, 2003; 42(11): 1879 - 1885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Herrmann Optimizing outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 15, 2003; 42(8): 1357 - 1359. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Napodano, G. Pasquetto, S. Sacca, C. Cernetti, V. Scarabeo, P. Pascotto, and B. Reimers Intracoronary thrombectomy improves myocardial reperfusion in patients undergoing direct angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 15, 2003; 42(8): 1395 - 1402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P Dobesh, S. L Lanfear, J. R Abu-Shanab, J. E Lakamp, S. Gowda, and M. Y Haikal Outcomes with Changes in Prescribing of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in PCI Ann. Pharmacother., October 1, 2003; 37(10): 1375 - 1380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Tcheng, D. E. Kandzari, C. L. Grines, D. A. Cox, M. B. Effron, E. Garcia, J. J. Griffin, G. Guagliumi, T. Stuckey, M. Turco, et al. Benefits and Risks of Abciximab Use in Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) Trial Circulation, September 16, 2003; 108(11): 1316 - 1323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Heitzer, I. Ollmann, K. Koke, T. Meinertz, and T. Munzel Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Blockade Improves Vascular Nitric Oxide Bioavailability in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Circulation, August 5, 2003; 108(5): 536 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Feldman, P. Coste, A. Furber, P. Dupouy, M. S. Slama, J.-P. Monassier, C. Tron, A. Lafont, M. Faraggi, D. Le Guludec, et al. Incomplete Resolution of ST-Segment Elevation Is a Marker of Transient Microcirculatory Dysfunction After Stenting for Acute Myocardial Infarction Circulation, June 3, 2003; 107(21): 2684 - 2689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A Crouch, J. M Nappi, and K. I Cheang Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibitors in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Acute Coronary Syndrome Ann. Pharmacother., June 1, 2003; 37(6): 860 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Grines, P. Serruys, and W. W. O'Neill Fibrinolytic Therapy: Is It A Treatment of the Past? Circulation, May 27, 2003; 107(20): 2538 - 2542. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Brener, S. G. Ellis, J. Schneider, C. Apperson-Hansen, and E. J. Topol Abciximab-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention and long-term survival--a prospective single-center registry Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2003; 24(7): 630 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Dibra, J. Mehilli, J. Dirschinger, J.u. Pache, J. Neverve, M. Schwaiger, A. Schomig, and A. Kastrati Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction myocardial perfusion grade in angiography correlates with myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with stenting or thrombolysis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 19, 2003; 41(6): 925 - 929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. K. Haager, P. Christott, N. Heussen, W. Lepper, P. Hanrath, and R. Hoffmann Prediction of clinical outcome after mechanical revascularization in acute myocardial infarction by markers of myocardial reperfusion J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 19, 2003; 41(4): 532 - 538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.M.J. Marques and C.A. Visser Myocardial contrast echocardiography in the assessment of pharmacologic intervention of the reperfusion injury Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2003; 24(1): 19 - 20. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.S Petronio, D Rovai, G Musumeci, R Baglini, C Nardi, U Limbruno, C Palagi, D Volterrani, and M Mariani Effects of abciximab on microvascular integrity and left ventricular functional recovery in patients with acute infarction treated by primary coronary angioplasty Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2003; 24(1): 67 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Marzilli, G. Sambuceti, R. Testa, and S. Fedele Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and coronary resistance in unstable angina J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 18, 2002; 40(12): 2102 - 2109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Dalby and G Montalescot Transfer for primary angioplasty: who and how? Heart, December 1, 2002; 88(6): 570 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.-J. Neumann and N. Jander How to best counteract the enemies? By ensuring adequate oxygen delivery Eur. Heart J. Suppl., November 1, 2002; 4(suppl_G): G35 - G42. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Kern Patterns of Left Ventricular Dilatation With an Opened Artery After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Missing Links to Long-Term Prognosis Circulation, October 29, 2002; 106(18): 2294 - 2295. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Kupatt, R. Wichels, J. Horstkotte, F. Krombach, H. Habazettl, and P. Boekstegers Molecular mechanisms of platelet-mediated leukocyte recruitment during myocardial reperfusion J. Leukoc. Biol., September 1, 2002; 72(3): 455 - 461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Herrmann, G. W. Stone, C. L. Grines, and J. E. Tcheng Comparison of Angioplasty with Stenting in Acute Myocardial Infarction N. Engl. J. Med., August 1, 2002; 347(5): 367 - 368. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Palmerini, M. A. Nedelman, L. E. Scudder, M. T. Nakada, R. E. Jordan, S. Smyth, R. E. Gordon, J. T. Fallon, and B. S. Coller Effects of abciximab on the acute pathology of blood vessels after arterial stenting in nonhuman primates J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 17, 2002; 40(2): 360 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.P.S. Henriques, F. Zijlstra, J.P. Ottervanger, M.-J. de Boer, A.W.J. van 't Hof, J.C.A. Hoorntje, and H. Suryapranata Incidence and clinical significance of distal embolization during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2002; 23(14): 1112 - 1117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. D. Aymong, M. J. Curtis, M. Youssef, M. M. Graham, L. Shewchuk, W. Leschuk, and T. J. Anderson Abciximab Attenuates Coronary Microvascular Endothelial Dysfunction After Coronary Stenting Circulation, June 25, 2002; 105(25): 2981 - 2985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Constantinides, T S N Lo, M Been, and M F Shiu Early experience with a helical coronary thrombectomy device in patients with acute coronary thrombosis. Heart, May 1, 2002; 87(5): 455 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Ambrose and E. E. Martinez A New Paradigm for Plaque Stabilization Circulation, April 23, 2002; 105(16): 2000 - 2004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Andrassy, M Zielinska, R Busch, A Schomig, and C Firschke Myocardial blood volume and the amount of viable myocardium early after mechanical reperfusion of acute myocardial infarction: prospective study using venous contrast echocardiography Heart, April 1, 2002; 87(4): 350 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Stone, C. L. Grines, D. A. Cox, E. Garcia, J. E. Tcheng, J. J. Griffin, G. Guagliumi, T. Stuckey, M. Turco, J. D. Carroll, et al. Comparison of Angioplasty with Stenting, with or without Abciximab, in Acute Myocardial Infarction N. Engl. J. Med., March 28, 2002; 346(13): 957 - 966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B R Brodie and T D Stuckey Mechanical reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction: Stent PAMI, ADMIRAL, CADILLAC and beyond Heart, March 1, 2002; 87(3): 191 - 192. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Stone, M. A. Peterson, A. J. Lansky, G. Dangas, R. Mehran, and M. B. Leon Impact of normalized myocardial perfusion after successful angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 20, 2002; 39(4): 591 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Rezkalla and R. A. Kloner No-Reflow Phenomenon Circulation, February 5, 2002; 105(5): 656 - 662. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Mehilli, A. Kastrati, J. Dirschinger, J. Pache, M. Seyfarth, R. Blasini, D. Hall, F.-J. Neumann, and A. Schomig Sex-Based Analysis of Outcome in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated Predominantly With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention JAMA, January 9, 2002; 287(2): 210 - 215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Loubeyre, M.-C. Morice, T. Lefevre, J.-F. Piechaud, Y. Louvard, and P. Dumas A randomized comparison of direct stenting with conventional stent implantation in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 2, 2002; 39(1): 15 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |