Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1998;98:2527-2533

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoffmeister, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Seipel, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoffmeister, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Seipel, L.

(Circulation. 1998;98:2527-2533.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Comparison of Procoagulant Effects of Streptokinase and Alteplase Regimens With Focus on the Kallikrein System and Plasmin

Hans Martin Hoffmeister, MD; Sebastian Szabo, MD; Christof Kastner, BSc; Martin E. Beyer, MD; Uwe Helber, MD; Silke Kazmaier; Hans Peter Wendel, PhD; Wolfgang Heller, PhD; Ludger Seipel, MD

From Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Abt Innere Medizin III, Tübingen, Germany.

Correspondence to Prof Dr Hans Martin Hoffmeister, FACC, FESC, Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Abt Innere Medizin III, Otfried-Müller-Straße 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is hampered by procoagulant effects. In vitro studies have indicated that plasmin stimulation activates the kallikrein–contact-phase system, resulting in thrombin activation. This prospective comparative study was designed to examine the procoagulant effects of streptokinase or alteplase in AMI.

Methods and Results—Sixty-one patients with AMI received 1.5 million U of streptokinase or front-loaded alteplase (up to 100 mg) and systemic heparin. Twenty-four patients with AMI and no thrombolytic therapy and 30 control subjects were examined for comparison. Molecular markers of thrombin, plasmin activation, and coagulation activities were determined before therapy and serially for up to 10 days. Moderate thrombin (initial thrombin-antithrombin [TAT] complex 18±5 versus 4±0.3 µg/L, P<0.05) and kallikrein (up to 45±4 versus 30±1 U/L at 3 hours, P<0.01) activation occurs in patients with AMI. D-Dimers are increased (P<0.01), and plasmin is stimulated (P<0.01). Streptokinase and alteplase increase TAT to 50±17 and 51±18 µg/L at 3 hours and to 50±17 and 33±14 µg/L at 6 hours, respectively (P<0.01). Kallikrein activity is elevated (P<0.01) to 76±5 and 71±7 U/L at 3 hours and 64±6 and 47±5 U/L by streptokinase and alteplase, respectively, at 6 hours. Reductions in fibrinogen and increases in D-dimers and plasmin-antiplasmin complexes are more marked (P<0.05 and 0.01) after streptokinase versus alteplase. Correlations were found among TAT, kallikrein activity, and plasmin activation (P<0.01).

Conclusions—The data indicate a more marked procoagulant action of the streptokinase regimen compared with front-loaded alteplase, thus supporting the hypothesis of a plasmin-mediated kallikrein activation with consecutive procoagulant action in vivo.


Key Words: streptokinase • alteplase • infarction • thrombolysis • coagulation


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
In acute myocardial infarction (AMI), streptokinase and front-loaded alteplase regimens are commonly used for thrombolysis.1 Unfortunately, reperfusion is not always achieved, and the success of the therapy is limited by reocclusion.2 3 The balance between prothrombotic and thrombolytic processes can be shifted toward thrombolysis by administration of plasminogen activators; however, procoagulant effects of such drugs have been reported.4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 These side effects are important because of a procoagulant state in acute coronary syndromes.12 13 14 15 16 17 In patients with AMI and thrombolytic therapy, markedly increased thrombin activation was associated with failure to open the occluded coronary artery and with a high reocclusion rate.18

As one pathway of thrombin stimulation of thrombolytics, activation of the contact phase of the coagulation by plasmin has been found in vitro.19 A recent clinical study measuring indirect plasmin markers proved the activation of the kallikrein–contact-phase system after streptokinase in patients with AMI,13 but no direct data on plasmin activation are available. Another pathway of activation of the kallikrein system may be the complement cascade.20 For the more "clot-specific" thrombolytic alteplase, no comparable data on the contact phase are available.

In a prospective, randomized clinical study, we compared the usual regimen with streptokinase and front-loaded alteplase on the kallikrein–contact-phase system and on molecular plasma markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis to examine (1) whether plasmin-mediated activation of the contact phase is related to thrombin generation and (2) whether differences in extent or duration of thrombin and plasmin stimulation exist after administration of these thrombolytic regimens in AMI.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patients and Protocol
Sixty-one patients with AMI who were eligible for thrombolytic therapy were included. All patients were referred to the intensive care unit for treatment of AMI. The patients fulfilled standard criteria of diagnosis of AMI: ST-segment elevation >0.1 mV in 2 limb leads or >0.2 mV in 2 chest leads, chest pain for >=30 minutes, and start of symptoms within 8 hours before admission. Diagnosis was confirmed by serial documentation of 12-lead ECG and by serial creatine kinase level determination.

Thirty percent of the patients were on aspirin, and 3% were on ACE inhibitors. All patients received aspirin (300 mg) and systemic heparin to prolong the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) to double the upper normal value (bolus of 5000 IU followed by 1000 heparin IU/h adjusted according to repeated aPTT determinations). Patients were randomized for thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase (Behring; 1.5 million U IV within 1 hour) or with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA; Thomae) with a front-loaded and weight-adjusted regimen (up to 100 mg over 90 minutes).1 Randomization was done monthly for all patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Data are listed in Table 1Down and indicate the absence of any significant difference between the 2 groups after randomization. Intravenous heparin was continued for >=48 hours. With this protocol, plasma heparin levels were <0.5 U/mL.12 Antianginal drugs were administered on an individual basis and included nitrates and ß-blockers. ACE inhibitor therapy was not initiated within the first 24 hours. After systemic heparinization, patients were switched to 7500 IU heparin SC BID until complete mobilization. In 41% of patients, coronary angiography was performed during the hospital stay, and coronary artery disease was proved.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Demographic and Angiographic Data of Patients With AMI

All patients gave informed consent to the protocol after verbal information. The protocol for the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Tübingen.

An additional group of 24 consecutive patients with AMI but without thrombolytic therapy was investigated for comparison. These patients fulfilled the same diagnostic criteria as the patients receiving thrombolytic therapy, except the time from the start of symptoms until admission of some patients was >8 hours (<24 hours). This group included patients with an unfavorable benefit/risk assessment for bleeding, delayed-admittance patients, and patients with direct coronary angioplasty. Therefore, this group was more inhomogeneous. Demographic and other data are also listed in Table 1Up, proving that this group did not differ (except the prolonged interval until admission) from the groups receiving thrombolytic therapy.

As control, 30 volunteers of comparable age (32 to 84 years) without any clinical signs of coronary heart disease were examined. Persons with a history of smoking, diabetes, or arterial hypertension were not included. During a 2-year follow-up of this group, there was no evidence of cardiovascular disease in any of the volunteers.

Blood Sampling and Measurements
Blood sampling was performed at admission and 3 hours, 6 hours, 24 hours, 2 days, 5 days, and 10 days later. The measurements were performed at all sampling time points if not otherwise indicated. The initial sampling was performed before administration of the thrombolytic drug and heparin. Except for initial samplings, the follow-up samplings were done between 7 and 8 AM to minimize diurnal variation. Details of the processing are published elsewhere.12

Determination of the thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) complex was done with a commercially available ELISA (Behring Werke). Plasmin/{alpha}2-antiplasmin (PAP) complex was measured with a sandwich immunoassay (Behring Werke).

tPA was measured with an ELISA (Chromogenix). For determination of plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI) activity, a chromogenic substrate test (S-2403) was used (Chromogenix). To avoid interference with residual thrombolytics, PAI was not measured 3 hours after the start of drug infusion. It was also not measured at 24 hours and 10 days. D-Dimers were determined by use of a capture ELISA technique (Boehringer). Plasma kallikreinlike activity and factor XII were determined by use of the chromogenic substrate S-2302 or S-2222 (Chromogenix/Unicorn Ltd). Both tests were performed initially, at 3 and 6 hours, and at 2 and 5 days. Fibrinogen (with the method of Clauss), antithrombin III (ATIII), and aPTT were determined in the routine laboratory for clinical chemistry of our institution.

Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean±SE. Data were analyzed with the statistical software package JMP (SAS Institute Inc). Data that were not normally distributed were converted to a logarithmic scale before analysis. Data of patients with AMI were compared (during the first 2 days) with the control subjects and among the groups of patients with an ANOVA and Tuckey-Kramer highest-significant-difference test with additional Bonferroni-Holmes adjustment for multiple comparisons. For comparison of follow-up data, a repetitive ANOVA was performed. We regarded P<0.05 as significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Coagulation
Initially, a slight activation of thrombin was observed in patients with AMI compared with control subjects (Figure 1Down and Tables 2Down and 3Down). In most of these patients, this activation soon reached normal levels and within 2 days showed no more significance (Table 2Down). A similar time course of activation was found for kallikrein activity (Figure 2Down). During the first day, activity rose to 45.2±3.8 U/L in AMI patients (P<0.01) and returned to normal during follow-up (Figure 2Down and Table 2Down). Factor XII was already activated at admission and remained activated during follow-up (P<0.01; Table 2Down). D-Dimers were elevated in patients with AMI at admission (P<0.01; Figure 3Down) and stayed increased (Table 2Down).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Levels of TAT complexes as marker of thrombin generation in patients with AMI and streptokinase, alteplase, or no thrombolytic therapy compared with control subjects (contr). Data indicate differences in paradoxical activation of coagulation in addition to hypercoagulative state in patients with AMI. *P<0.05 vs control subjects; #P<0.01 vs control subjects (mean±SEM).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Markers of Coagulation and Fibrinolysis at Admission and Different Follow-Up Times in Patients With Streptokinase or Alteplase Therapy or Without Thrombolytic Therapy


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Measures of Coagulation and Fibrinolysis of Control Subjects for Comparison



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Kallikrein plasma activity in patients with AMI and streptokinase, alteplase, or no thrombolytic therapy compared with control subjects (contr). Plots indicate differences in increases in plasma kallikreinlike activity in patients after thrombolytic therapy with more prolonged activation after streptokinase compared with front-loaded alteplase. *P<0.05 vs control subjects; #P<0.01 vs control subjects; {dagger}P<0.01 vs AMI patients without thrombolysis (mean±SEM).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. D-Dimer plasma levels in patients with AMI and streptokinase, alteplase, or no thrombolytic therapy compared with control subjects (contr). After streptokinase, levels are elevated longer compared with those in patients receiving front-loaded alteplase. *P<0.05 vs control subjects; #P<0.01 vs control subjects; {dagger}P<0.01 vs AMI patients without thrombolysis (mean±SEM).

After streptokinase application, a marked and prolonged elevation of the TAT complexes was found (P<0.01). Thrombin activation 2 days after streptokinase did not differ from that of patients without thrombolysis (Figure 1Up). The TAT increase after alteplase was similar to that after streptokinase, but levels 6 hours after admission were already lower after alteplase compared with streptokinase (Figure 1Up). TAT levels within the initial phase were correlated with PAP complexes in patients who received thrombolytic therapy (r=0.41; P<0.01; y=0.61x+2.84). During follow-up, TAT levels were moderately elevated (P<0.05 by repetitive ANOVA) in patients with thrombolysis (Table 2Up).

ATIII tended to be reduced initially in all groups of patients with AMI (P=NS) and became further reduced in all groups during follow-up without any significant difference among the patient groups (P<0.01; Table 2Up).

Streptokinase increased kallikrein activity to 76.1±4.8 U/L. The elevated activity persisted for 1 day (P<0.01 versus control subjects; Figure 2Up). Activity was also higher as in AMI patients without thrombolytic therapy (P<0.01; Figure 2Up). After alteplase, kallikrein activity rose to 71.1±7.0 U/L (P<0.01), but the increase in activity was not as prolonged as after streptokinase (P<0.05 by repetitive ANOVA between time courses of both groups; Figure 2Up and Table 2Up). Six hours after alteplase, the kallikrein activity was no higher than that of patients without thrombolysis (47.3±4.9 versus 35.9±2.7 U/L; P=NS) but was still different from that of control subjects (29.6±1.3 U/L; P<0.05; Figure 2Up). After 2 days, no difference in kallikrein activity between the 3 groups could be found (Figure 2Up). Kallikrein activity in patients who received thrombolysis was correlated to PAP levels (admission until 3 hours after thrombolysis: r=0.60; P<0.01; y=2.32x-0.45) and to TAT levels (r=0.42; P<0.01; y=0.86x-17.47). These correlations (r=0.3 to 0.45) were also significant (as well as the correlation of TAT and PAP) if later time points and patients without thrombolysis were included.

Factor XII consumption was present during AMI (Table 2Up); the reductions after streptokinase (63.3±8.9%) and after alteplase (68.8±6.7%) were not different (P=NS for differences between groups by repetitive ANOVA).

After thrombolysis, a significant increase in D-dimer levels occurred for 2 days with streptokinase versus control subjects and patients without thrombolytic therapy (P<0.01; Figure 3Up and Table 2Up). D-Dimers were markedly higher after alteplase versus streptokinase after the initial 6 hours (P<0.01). Alteplase caused a significant increase in D-dimer levels for 48 hours (Table 2Up), with peak values below those of the streptokinase group (P<0.05 by repetitive ANOVA; Figure 3Up and Table 2Up). After 6 hours, the levels did not differ from the slightly elevated levels observed in patients with AMI without thrombolytic therapy (Table 2Up).

Fibrinogen and Fibrinolytic System
In patients with AMI, initial fibrinogen levels were elevated compared with those of control subjects (P<0.01; Table 2Up). After streptokinase application, fibrinogen decreased to 59±9 mg/dL (P<0.01). Fibrinogen, which recovered after 48 hours, rose further and was markedly elevated until the 10th day (Table 2Up). In patients with AMI and no thrombolytic therapy, fibrinogen similarly increased to values >600 mg/dL beginning on the second day (Table 2Up). After alteplase, fibrinogen decreased to 208±23 mg/dL (P<0.01) at 6 hours after the start of thrombolysis and thus was not as markedly reduced as after streptokinase (P<0.05 by repetitive ANOVA). Fibrinogen recovered after 1 day and increased further (Table 2Up).

PAI levels at admission did not differ significantly in patients with AMI and no thrombolytic therapy and in control subjects. At 6 and 24 hours after admission, an upward trend was observed (P<0.05 for the whole follow-up by repetitive ANOVA). After streptokinase therapy, no significant difference from patients without thrombolytic therapy was detectable. Slightly higher PAI activity, which was statistically not different from data of other patients with AMI (Table 2Up), was already observed at admission in patients who received alteplase (P<0.01 versus control subjects).

tPA mass concentration was persistently increased in AMI patients; it was twice as high as in control subjects (P<0.01; Table 2Up). Streptokinase therapy did not alter these levels; 127.7±32.0 ng/mL was measured after alteplase infusion (P<0.01 versus all other groups), and the levels were equal to those of the other patients 3 hours later (Table 2Up).

In patients with AMI who did not receive thrombolysis (and who entered the intensive care unit later), a stimulated fibrinolysis was already present and persisted for the whole observation period (P<0.01; Table 2Up). Streptokinase caused a significant increase in PAP complexes (P<0.01; Figure 4Down). PAP levels remained elevated for the first 24 hours compared with those of patients without thrombolytic therapy (P<0.01; Figure 4Down and Table 2Up). After alteplase, PAP complexes also increased markedly during the first day (Figure 4Down; P<0.01 versus patients without thrombolytic therapy) without statistical difference from the patients with streptokinase treatment (P=NS by repetitive ANOVA).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. PAP complexes demonstrating systemic plasmin stimulation by both regimens. PAP complexes were more marked after streptokinase compared with front-loaded alteplase therapy (compared with control subjects [contr] and patients without thrombolytic therapy). *P<0.05 vs control subjects; #P<0.01 vs control subjects; {dagger}P<0.01 vs AMI patients without thrombolysis (mean±SEM).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present prospective study compared the changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis caused by the currently used regimen with streptokinase or front-loaded alteplase.1 Both drugs have a procoagulant action, which was more pronounced (and longer lasting) with streptokinase. The latter regimen also tended to activate the systemic fibrinolysis more markedly compared with the more clot-specific alteplase.

Comparison of Data on Coagulation and Fibrinolysis With the Literature
In patients with AMI, a moderate hypercoagulative state is observed similar to that in unstable angina pectoris.12 13 15 Levels of PAI, tPA mass concentration, thrombin activation markers, fibrinogen, and other markers are changed, indicating activation14 16 17 because it was also found in patients without thrombolytic therapy in the present study. Application of thrombolytics causes marked effects in addition to the preexisting changes.

Streptokinase infusion increases thrombin activation more than 3-fold. This increase is still detectable 6 hours after the beginning of therapy, as reported by others,10 whereas the later measurements of TAT complexes are at the level of those in patients with AMI but without thrombolytic therapy.13 21 The effect of streptokinase is confirmed by measuring fibrinopeptide A as a marker of thrombin action.11 22 23 Detection of marked activation of thrombin after streptokinase was reported to be associated with failure of thrombolysis or early reocclusion.3 23 Thrombin activation is followed by a slight reduction in ATIII corresponding to that in patients without thrombolysis. A reduction in fibrinogen and increases in the fibrin split product D-dimer are detectable for 2 days. Activation of plasmin judged as PAP complexes was about 20-fold compared with that in patients without thrombolytic therapy.

The use of alteplase reveals similar findings: Levels of TAT complexes, prothrombin fragment 1+2, and fibrinopeptide A3 6 8 10 11 18 are higher, along with a reduction in fibrinogen and an increase in D-dimers. High thrombin activation markers are reported to be associated with failure of lysis18 but not with worse clinical outcome.8 Elevated PAI activity after alteplase was also observed by others.24 Thus, PAI does not seem to be related to thrombin or to platelet activity (ß-thromboglobulin was decreased24 ). In contrast, other authors observed prolonged platelet activation after alteplase.25 Prolonged stimulated fibrinolysis compared with the duration of elevated tPA mass concentration was found for alteplase, which could be explained by enhanced binding of alteplase to fibrin.26 27

Comparison of Both Drugs
Comparison of thrombolytic drugs in vivo may result in very different findings compared with investigations in vitro because of dynamic changes in various activators and inhibitors. Differences in dose and mode of administration limit direct drug comparison. Only the whole thrombolytic regimen, including heparinization, can be compared. No data on the kallikrein system in relation to plasmin and thrombin activation are available for comparison of the currently used streptokinase and front-loaded alteplase regimens with identical intravenous heparin. Prior studies10 11 do not provide data on the present front-loaded rtPA regimen, which is regarded as the reference in many studies.28 29

The extent of activation of coagulation is not significantly different between both regimens, but after streptokinase, the procoagulant effect measured as thrombin activation lasts longer. Similarly, the levels of D-dimers and PAP complexes are elevated for a longer time after streptokinase. Cleavage products of kininogen were detected at higher levels after streptokinase versus alteplase up to 24 hours after thrombolysis.20 Enhanced levels after 24 hours are probably not due to the differences in the plasma half-life of the drugs but rather to paradox activation by split products and to action in bound states.27 The local thrombolytic efficacy cannot be directly derived from systemic data, as, for example, the GUSTO I data1 imply a greater beneficial net effect of the alteplase regimen despite less systemically measurable plasmin activation. It may be speculated that the longer procoagulant action of the streptokinase regimen is of greater importance for coronary reocclusion or failure of reperfusion therapy compared with the less marked systemic activation of the fibrinolysis by the more clot-specific alteplase.

Mechanisms of the Procoagulant Action
Exposure of thrombin during thrombin dissolution was discussed as the source of the procoagulant activity,11 but quantitatively this hypothesis seems to be very unlikely as derived from clinical data.26 Recently, an in vitro investigation by Ewald and Eisenberg19 reported evidence of plasmin-induced thrombin activation via positive feedback on the kallikrein–factor XII system. They demonstrated the key role of plasmin in activation of the kallikrein–factor XII pathway in response to pharmacological thrombolysis using an in vitro test with or without a plasmin inhibitor. Their experimental findings support the present study. Plasmin-mediated bradykinin release from high-molecular-weight kininogen caused by increased kallikrein activity was also observed in vitro.20 30 Increased kallikrein activity, activated factor XII, consumption of inhibitors (including the C1-esterase inhibitor), and generation of bradykinin after streptokinase were proved in a recent study in vivo.13 Similarly, cleavage of kininogen and complement was found to be more marked after streptokinase.20 The correlations among PAP, kallikrein activity, and TAT support the meaning of this activation pathway. However, correlations are not proof of only one causal relationship, as an in vitro study described a plasmin-independent activation of thrombin by thrombolytic agents.31 In a limited number of patients with AMI, an association between TAT and markers of fibrinolytic activity independent of the thrombolytic regimen was described.6 Our data indicate that both streptokinase and alteplase activate the kallikrein-kinin system in accordance with the difference in procoagulant action (thrombin activation) of both regimens. It supports the in vitro findings with respect to kallikrein stimulation with plasmin.19 Alteplase may also activate thrombin mainly by a plasmin-associated pathway.32 It can be supposed that the plasmin-mediated activation of the kallikrein-kinin system with consecutive thrombin activation also occurs after alteplase application in vivo, as a systemic stimulation of the fibrinolysis is seen. This pathway, which is activated despite intravenous heparin therapy, does not seem to be specific for streptokinase but also is important for other thrombolytics. Interestingly, a recent investigation33 reported that staphylokinase, which does not significantly activate the systemic plasmin, has no procoagulant effect. This finding supports the present results and the role of plasmin activation for the paradoxical procoagulation.

Study Strengths and Limitations
The present study was prospective and randomized but not double-blinded. Measurements were done by technicians who were not aware of the clinical data. Both intervention groups agreed very well in demographic and initial blood test data. Because a control group with AMI without specific therapy cannot be obtained for ethical reasons, we included consecutive patients with AMI who did not qualify for thrombolytic therapy. Most of the changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis13 are known to persist for a prolonged time12 34 with few exceptions. Therefore, the delayed admission of this kind of patients may affect only the initial blood test but not the later data.

The steady-state plasma heparin levels with our regimen were <0.5 U/mL12 and did not affect the measurements.12 35 36 After the first blood sampling, all 3 groups had an identical heparin regimen; therefore, differences among the groups cannot be attributed to heparinization. The extent of thrombin activation without heparin therapy might even be higher.7 8 37

Conclusions
The results of the this study demonstrate in a prospective, randomized comparison a more marked paradoxical activation of the coagulation system, including the kallikrein system, after streptokinase versus front-loaded alteplase thrombolysis. This effect has to be seen in addition to the preexisting hypercoagulative state in AMI. Because all patients already had a systemic heparin therapy, a more effective antithrombotic supportive therapy should be developed to push the balance between coagulation and fibrinolysis toward thrombolysis. More detailed knowledge of the involved pathways, eg, the plasmin-mediated kallikrein activation, will be a prerequisite to cope with this task.

Received April 15, 1998; revision received August 10, 1998; accepted August 13, 1998.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. The GUSTO Investigators. An international randomized trial and comparing thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:673–682.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Grines CL, Browne KF, Marco J, Rothbaum D, Stone GW, O'Keefe J, Overlie P. Comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:673–679.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Scharfstein JS, Abendschein DR, Eisenberg PR, George D, Cannon CP, Becker RC,. Sobel B, Cupples LA, Braunwald E. Usefulness of fibrinogenolytic and procoagulant markers during thrombolytic therapy in predicting clinical outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:503–510.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Rapold HJ. Promotion of thrombin activity by thrombolytic therapy without simultaneous anticoagulation. Lancet. 1990;1:481–482.

5. Eisenberg PR, Miletich JP, Sobel BE. Factors responsible for the differential procoagulant effects of diverse plasminogen activators in plasma. Fibrinolysis. 1991;5:217–224.

6. Goto S, Kawai Y, Abe S, Takahashi E, Handa S, Ogawa S, Watanabe K, Hori S, Ikeda. Y. Serial changes in coagulant activities after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Angiology. 1994;45:273–281.

7. Eisenberg PR, Sobel BE, Jaffe AS. Activation of prothrombin accompanying thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:1065–1069.[Abstract]

8. Rapold HJ, de Bono D, Arnold AER, Arnout J, de Cock F, Collen D, Verstraete M. Plasma fibrinopeptide A levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with alteplase. Circulation. 1992;85:928–934.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Baglin TP, Luddington R, Jennings I, Richards EM. Thrombin generation and myocardial infarction during infusion of tissue-plasminogen activator. Lancet. 1993;341:505. Abstract.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Merlini PA, Bauer KA, Oltrona L, Ardissino D, Spinola A, Cattaneo M, Broccolino M, Mannucci PM, Rosenberg RD. Thrombin generation and activity during thrombolysis and concomitant heparin therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:203–209.[Abstract]

11. Owen J, Friedman KD, Grossman BA, Wilkins C, Berke AD, Powers ER. Thrombolytic therapy with tissue plasminogen activator or streptokinase induces transient thrombin activity. Blood. 1988;72:616–620.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Hoffmeister HM, Jur M, Wendel HP, Heller W, Seipel L. Alterations of the coagulation, the fibrinolytic, and the kallikrein-kinin system in the acute and postacute phase in patients with unstable angina pectoris. Circulation. 1995;91:2520–2527.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Hoffmeister HM, Ruf M, Wendel HP, Heller W, Seipel L. Streptokinase-induced activation of the kallikrein-kinin system and of the contact phase in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1998;31:764–772.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Huber K, Rose D, Resch I. Circadian fluctuations of plasminogen activator inhibitor and tissue plasminogen activator levels in plasma of patients with unstable coronary artery disease and acute myocardial infarction. Thromb Haemost. 1988;60:372–376.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Gram J, Kluft C, Jespersen J. Depression of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) activity and rise of t-PA inhibition and acute phase reactants in blood of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Thromb Haemost. 1987;58:817–821.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Rennie JA, Ogston D. Changes in coagulation factors following acute myocardial infarction in man. Haemostasis. 1976;5:258–264.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Gidron E, Margalit R, Oliven A, Shalitin Y. Effect of myocardial infarction on components of fibrinolytic system. Br Heart J. 1977;39:19–24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Gulba DC, Westhoff-Bleck M, Jost S, Rafflenbeul W, Daniel WG, Hecker H, Lichtlen PR. Increased thrombin levels during thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1991;83:937–944.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Ewald GA, Eisenberg PR. Plasmin-mediated activation of contact system in response to pharmacological thrombolysis. Circulation. 1995;91:28–36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Agostoni A, Gardinali Frangi D, Cafaro C, Conciato L, Sponzilli C, Salvioni A, Cugno M, Ciardi M. Activation of complement and kinin-systems after thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1994;90:2666–2670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Szczeklik A, Dropinski J, Radwan J, Krzanowski M. Persistent generation of thrombin after acute myocardial infarction. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992;12:548–553.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Eisenberg PR, Sherman L, Rich M, Schwartz D, Schechtman K, Geltman EM, Sobel BE, Jaffe AS. Importance of continued activation of thrombin reflected by fibrinopeptide A to the efficacy of thrombolysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;7:1255–1262.[Abstract]

23. Eisenberg PR, Sherman LA, Jaffe AS. Paradoxic elevation of fibrinopeptide A after streptokinase: evidence for continued thrombosis despite intense fibrinolysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;10:527–529.[Abstract]

24. Rapold HJ, Grimaudo V, Declerck PJ, Kruithof EKO, Bachmann F. Plasma levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1, ß-thromboglobulin, and fibrinopeptide A before, during, and after treatment of acute myocardial infarction with alteplase. Blood. 1991;78:1490–1495.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Kerins DM, Roy L, Fitzgerald GA, Fitzgerald DJ. Platelet and vascular function during coronary thrombolysis with tissue-type plasminogen activator. Circulation. 1989;80:1718–1725.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Ring ME, Butman SM, Bruck DC, Feinberg WM, Corrigan JJ. Fibrin metabolism in patients with acute myocardial infarction during and after treatment with tissue-type plasminogen activator. Thromb Haemost. 1988;60:428–433.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Eisenberg PR, Sherman LA, Perez J, Jaffe AS. Relationship between elevated plasma levels of cross-linked fibrin degradation products (XL-FDP) and the clinical presentation of patients with myocardial infarction. Thromb Res. 1987;46:109–120.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. The GUSTO III Investigators. A comparison of reteplase with alteplase for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1118–1123.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists' (FTT) Collaborative Group. Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients. Lancet. 1994;343:322–331.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Kleniewsky J, Blankenship DT, Cardin AD, Donaldson V. Mechanism of enhanced kinin release from high molecular weight kininogen by plasma kallikrein after its exposure to plasmin. J Lab Clin Med. 1992;120:129–139.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Brommer EJP, Meijer P. Thrombin generation induced by the intrinsic or extrinsic coagulation pathway is accelerated by streptokinase, independently of plasminogen. Thromb Haemost. 1993;70:995–997.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Mirshahi M, Soria J, Soria C, Samama M, Caen JP. Degradation of fibrinogen by tissue plasminogen activator: consequences for fibrin polymerization. Thromb Res. 1990;52(suppl X):21–26.

33. Okada K, Lijnen HR, Moreau H, Vanderschueren S, Collen D. Procoagulant properties of intravenous staphylokinase versus tissue-type plasminogen activator. Thromb Haemost. 1996;76:857–859.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Munkvad S, Jespersen J, Gram J, Kluft C. Depression of factor-XII-dependent fibrinolytic activity characterizes patients with early myocardial reinfarction after recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:454–458.[Abstract]

35. Pixley RA, Cassello A, De La Cadena RA, Kaufman N, Colman RW. Effect of heparin on the activation of factor XII and the contact system in plasma. Thromb Haemost. 1991;66:540–547.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Heller W, Fuhrer G, Gallimore MJ, Hoffmeister HE. Prekallikrein and kallikrein-like activity determination in heparinized plasma samples. Haemostasis. 1985;15:64–65.

37. Melandri G, Branzi A, Semprini F, Cervi V, Galiè N, Magnani B. Enhanced thrombolytic efficacy and reduction of infarct size by simultaneous infusion of streptokinase and heparin. Br Heart J. 1990;64:118–120.The procoagulant effects of the 2 currently used streptokinase and alteplase regimens in relation to kallikrein and plasmin stimulation were examined in acute myocardial infarction. Thrombolysis has an additional effect on the preexisting hypercoagulative state of these patients. After 1.5 million U of streptokinase, the procoagulant effect has been slightly more pronounced compared with that in patients who received front-loaded alteplase.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJ Case ReportsHome page
D. A Gorog, S. Saraf, and V. Markides
Coronary thrombosis: In vivo, ex vivo and in vitro
BMJ Case Reports, April 14, 2009; 2009(apr07_2): bcr0920080983 - bcr0920080983.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
S. Steiner-Boker, M. Cejna, C. Nasel, E. Minar, and C. W. Kopp
Successful Revascularization of Acute Carotid Stent Thrombosis by Facilitated Thrombolysis
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2004; 25(8): 1411 - 1413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN APPL THROMB HEMOSTHome page
W. F. Baker Jr
Thrombolytic Therapy
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, October 1, 2002; 8(4): 291 - 314.
[PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
F.J. Van de Werf, E.M. Antman, and M.L. Simoons
Managing ST elevation myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., May 1, 2002; 4(suppl_E): E15 - E23.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoffmeister, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Seipel, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoffmeister, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Seipel, L.