| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From Ahmanson Biological Imaging Clinic/Nuclear Medicine, Department of
Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and Department of Physiology (F.D.M.), UCLA
School of Medicine and Laboratory of Structural Biology & Molecular
Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Correspondence to Johannes Czernin, MD, Ahmanson Biological Imaging Clinic/Nuclear Medicine, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA School of Medicine, AR-259 CHS, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6948. E-mail jczernin{at}mail.nuc.ucla.edu
Methods and ResultsMyocardial blood flow (MBF) was quantified
with [13N]ammonia and positron emission tomography (PET)
at rest, during cold pressor testing
(endothelium-dependent vasomotion), and during
dipyridamole-induced hyperemia in 16 long-term
smokers and 17 nonsmokers. MBF at rest did not differ between the 2
groups. Cold induced similar increases in rate-pressure product
(RPP) in smokers and nonsmokers. However, MBF increased only in
nonsmokers and was, during cold, higher than in smokers (0.91±0.18
versus 0.78±0.14 mL · g-1 ·
min-1, P<0.05). MBF normalized to the RPP
(derived from the ratio of MBF ([milliliters per gram per minute] to
RPP [beats per minute times millimeters of mercury] times 10 000)
declined in smokers but remained unchanged in nonsmokers (0.86±0.10
versus 0.72±0.11, P=0.0006, and 0.99±0.25 versus
0.96±0.27, P=NS). The hyperemic response to
dipyridamole and the myocardial flow reserve did not
differ between the 2 groups. In a multiple regression model adjusted
for age, sex, serum lipid levels, years of smoking, and pack-years,
years of smoking was the strongest predictor of the normalized blood
flow response to cold (P<0.001), followed by the
HDL/LDL ratio.
ConclusionsThe normal hyperemic response to
dipyridamole in long-term smokers indicates a preserved
endothelium-independent coronary vascular
smooth muscle relaxation, whereas the abnormal response to cold
suggests a defect in coronary vasomotion likely located at the
level of the coronary endothelium. Its severity
depends on the total exposure time to smoking.
Until recently, assessment of coronary
endothelial function in humans required
intracoronary administration of acetylcholine. However, Zeiher
et al5 reported a significant correlation between
the vasomotor responses to intracoronary acetylcholine and cold
pressor testing in patients with mild atherosclerosis,
suggesting that cold pressor testing might be useful for probing
endothelium-dependent coronary
vasomotion.6 Dynamic, high spatial and temporal
resolution positron emission tomography (PET) imaging permits the
noninvasive quantification of myocardial blood flow. Thus, the effects
of interventions such as cold pressor testing or
intravenous dipyridamole as probes of
coronary vasomotor function can be evaluated noninvasively. The
myocardial blood flow responses to these interventions might serve as
indexes of endothelium-dependent and -independent
coronary vasomotion.
Therefore, the aim of the current study was to determine noninvasively
with [13N]ammonia PET imaging whether long-term
smoking affects coronary vasomotion and vasodilator capacity in
smokers without evidence of epicardial coronary artery
disease.
All individuals refrained from intake of caffeine-containing food or
beverages for at least 24 hours before the PET
study.7 The smokers abstained from smoking for at
least 4 hours before the PET study.8 Each
participant signed an informed consent form approved by the Human
Subject Protection Committee of the University of California, Los
Angeles.
Positron Emission Tomography
Heart rate, arterial blood pressure, and 12-lead ECG were
recorded continuously throughout the study. Heart rate and the
arterial blood pressure obtained during the first 2 minutes
of each dynamic image acquisition sequence were averaged and used to
calculate the rate-pressure product as an index of cardiac
work.
Semiquantitative Analysis
Normal myocardial perfusion was defined as an
[13N]ammonia uptake within 2 SD of the normal
mean for both rest and dipyridamole images. To rule out
blood flow defects and thus significant coronary artery disease
in the study participants, the polar maps were compared with a database
of 20 normal individuals previously established at our institution.
Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow
A single time-activity curve was obtained for each vascular territory
by averaging the time activity data from the 3 short-axis planes.
Because myocardial blood flow did not differ between vascular
territories, a single measurement of myocardial blood flow was obtained
by averaging the territorial time activity
data.10 12 13
Partial volume effects were corrected by use of a recovery coefficient
that assumes a uniform left ventricular wall thickness of 1
cm.14 Both the blood pool and myocardial
time-activity curves were corrected for physical decay and were fitted
to a previously validated two-compartment tracer kinetic model that
corrects for spillover of activity from the blood pool into the
left ventricular
myocardium.15
Serum Lipid Measurements
Statistical Analysis
Discriminant and logistic regression analyses were performed to
assess relationships between cigarette smoking and myocardial blood
flow at rest, resting blood flow normalized to the rate-pressure
product, myocardial blood flow during cold pressor, cold pressor
blood flow normalized to the rate-pressure product, and myocardial
blood flow during dipyridamole-induced
hyperemia.19 This analysis
revealed that the normalized myocardial blood flow response to cold was
the only variable that discriminated between smokers and
nonsmokers. Therefore, a stepwise and all-possible-subset multiple
regression was used to evaluate the relationship between normalized
blood flow response during cold (the dependent variable) and
independent variables such as age, sex, total
cholesterol, HDL or HDL/LDL, years of smoking, or
pack-years in all 33 participants. Of note, when HDL was included as a
variable in a subset, the HDL/LDL ratio was not present and
vice versa. Also, when pack-years was present in a subset, years of
smoking was not included and vice versa. Thus, our mathematical model
accounted for the possibility of covariance of these factors.
From these subsets, the one with the independent variables that
yielded the highest multiple R was selected for the multiple
regression equation. Values of P<0.05 were considered
significant.
Semiquantitative Analysis of PET Images
Myocardial Blood Flow and Coronary Vasomotion
The magnitude of the blood flow response to cold varied between
participants (from a 20% decrease to a 103% increase). Resting
myocardial blood flow is correlated linearly to the rate-pressure
product as an index of cardiac work.10,22
Cold-induced increases in rate-pressure product also remained
significantly correlated to changes in blood flow in nonsmokers
(y=15.54+0.53xx; r=0.63;
P<0.008). To account for interindividual differences in the
flow response to cold, myocardial blood flow was therefore normalized
to the rate-pressure product at rest and during cold pressor
testing in both groups. Normalized myocardial blood flow was derived
from the ratio of blood flow (milliliters per gram per minute) to the
rate-pressure product (beats per minute times millimeters of
mercury) times 10 000. Despite similar rate-pressure products at
rest and during cold in smokers and nonsmokers, normalized myocardial
blood flow declined in smokers but remained unchanged in nonsmokers
(0.86±0.10 versus 0.72±0.11, P=0.0006, and 0.99±0.25
versus 0.96±0.27, P=NS; the Figure
Hyperemic Blood Flow and Flow Reserve
Coronary Vascular Resistance
To relate the hyperemic blood flow to one of its major
determinants (the coronary driving pressure), the minimal
coronary vascular resistance was calculated. The minimal
coronary resistance during dipyridamole
infusion did not differ between the 2 groups (52±12 versus 46±12
mm Hg · mL · g-1 ·
min-1, P=0.2).
Serum Lipid Measurements
The average levels of total and LDL cholesterol did not
differ between smokers and nonsmokers (187±40 versus 188±35 and
120±36 versus 117±33 mg/dL, P=NS, respectively). HDL
tended to be lower in smokers (36±10 versus 44±14 mg/dL,
P=0.07), whereas the HDL/LDL ratio did not differ between
the 2 groups (0.34±0.15 versus 0.41±0.21, P=NS).
Discriminant and Multivariate Analyses
None of the other variables such as age (F value, 0.35;
P=0.63), sex (F value, 0.95; P=0.60), total
cholesterol (F value, 4.05; P=0.46), HDL (F
value, 4.30; P=0.78), and pack-years (F value, 8.46;
P=0.67) was predictive of the normalized myocardial blood
flow response to cold.
Effects of Smoking on Endothelium-Dependent
Coronary Vasomotion
Cold pressor testing evokes a mixed nervous response via stimulation of
coronary vasoconstrictor adrenergic
Several mechanisms might account for the smoking-induced alterations in
coronary endothelial function. Smoking is
associated with a direct toxic effect on human
endothelial cells,26 27 reduces
endothelial prostacyclin
production,28 and increases leukocyte
adhesion to endothelial cells,29
which is an early event in the atherosclerotic process. Cigarette smoke
contains a large number of oxidants, and recent observations described
a role of oxygen-derived free radicals in mediating
endothelial dysfunction,30 31
which can be modulated by the potent antioxidant vitamin
C.32 Alternatively, smoking increases
endothelial angiotensin II
production, which reduces nitric oxide activity that might
contribute to endothelial dysfunction in
smokers.33 Increased platelet
aggregation26 and serum
fibrinogen,34 as well as decreased serum
plasminogen levels35 known to occur
in smokers, might also impair endothelial function in
smokers.
In the present study, systolic and mean
arterial blood pressures were higher in smokers than in
nonsmokers at baseline and during cold pressor testing. However, the
rate-pressure product, as an index of cardiac work, did not differ
between the 2 groups. Cold failed to increase myocardial blood flow in
long-term smokers despite similar increases in rate-pressure
product in smokers and nonsmokers. Thus, the different blood flow
responses to cold cannot be accounted for by differences in the
hemodynamic responses between the groups.
Differences in lifestyle between the 2 study groups might have affected
our observations. As demonstrated previously, short-term
cardiovascular conditioning lowers the resting
rate-pressure product, serum cholesterol, and LDL
cholesterol in healthy individuals. Furthermore,
cardiovascular conditioning improves myocardial flow
reserve by lowering resting blood flow and increasing the
coronary vasodilator capacity.36 In the
present study, no differences in cardiac work at rest or in serum
lipid levels were found between smokers and nonsmokers. In addition,
myocardial flow reserve was similar in both groups. Thus, the abnormal
coronary vasomotion in response to cold observed in long-term
smokers is unlikely to be attributable to differences in lifestyles
between the 2 study groups.
Estrogen also might affect coronary vasomotor function and thus
flow responses to cold pressor testing. However, the current study
population consisted of 16 smokers (13 men and 3 women) and 17
nonsmokers (10 men and 7 women). The relative proportion of women was
similar for the 2 groups (P=0.26). In the smoking group, 2
women were postmenopausal and 1 women was premenopausal. In the
nonsmoking group, 4 women were postmenopausal and 3 were premenopausal.
Of note, none of the women enrolled was under estrogen-replacement
therapy or contraceptive medication. Thus, only 4 of 33 participants
might have exhibited some effect of estrogen on myocardial blood flow.
In addition, the multivariate analysis failed
to identify an effect of sex on the myocardial blood flow response to
cold.
In the absence of any significant intergroup differences and together
with previous observations (as described above), the abnormal blood
flow response to cold in the long-term smokers observed in the current
study most likely resulted from coronary
endothelial dysfunction.
The current investigation expands the findings of previous clinical
studies that reported that the degree of abnormalities in
peripheral arterial vasomotion was correlated
with the duration of cigarette smoking.1 This
implies a progressive impairment in coronary
endothelial function as a consequence of smoking;
whether it indicates progression of preclinical coronary artery
disease has yet to be determined.
Effect of Serum Cholesterol on the Myocardial Blood
Flow Response to Cold
Effects of Smoking on Endothelium-Independent
Coronary Vasomotion
Study Limitations
Second, the uptake of [13N]ammonia during the
cold pressor test was homogeneous in smokers and nonsmokers
by visual analysis. Polar maps of the relative
[13N]ammonia tracer distribution were generated
for the myocardial blood flow study during cold pressor testing.
However, because no normal database for the relative
[13N]ammonia distribution during cold pressor
testing was available, these polar maps were normalized to the peak 5%
of activity within each map as described
previously.48 This analysis revealed
homogeneous tracer distribution throughout all 3 vascular
territories during cold in both groups. Thus, smokers did not exhibit a
greater degree of heterogeneity in relative myocardial
perfusion than nonsmokers. Absolute flow values during cold pressor
testing were similar in the 3 vascular territories in smokers and
nonsmokers.
Third, flow-limiting coronary artery disease might have
affected the blood flow response to cold in long-term smokers.
Coronary artery disease could have been ruled out with
certainty only through coronary arteriography, which seemed
unjustified in these asymptomatic individuals. However,
dipyridamole stress testing did not reveal any
perfusion defects, a finding that argues against flow-limiting
coronary artery disease in both the smokers and nonsmokers
enrolled in the present study.20 21
Finally, the correction for partial volume effects, which assumes a
uniform myocardial wall thickness of 1 cm, might have introduced a
systematic error in the blood flow
measurements.14 On the basis of phantom studies,
partial volume effects were corrected for by use of a recovery
coefficient of 0.73. Assuming that wall thickness remained constant
between studies, a systematic error in correcting for partial volume
would have equally affected all 3 blood flow measurements.
Conclusions
Received January 7, 1998;
revision received March 2, 1998;
accepted March 17, 1998.
2.
Kiowski W, Linder L, Stoschitsky K, Pfisterer M,
Burckhardt D, Burkart F, Bühler FR. Diminished vascular response
to inhibition of endothelium-derived nitric oxide and
enhanced vasoconstriction to exogenously administered endothelin-1 in
clinically healthy smokers. Circulation. 1994;90:2734.
3.
Vita JA, Treasure CB, Nabel EG, McLenachan JM, Fish
RD, Yeung AC, Vekshtein VI, Selwyn AP, Ganz P. Coronary
vasomotor response to acetylcholine relates to risk factors for
coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1990;81:491497.
4.
Zeiher AM, Schaechinger V, Minners J. Long-term
cigarette smoking impairs endothelium-dependent
coronary arterial vasodilator function.
Circulation. 1995;92:10941100.
5.
Zeiher A, Drexler H, Wollschlaeger H, Saurbier B, Just
H. Coronary vasomotion in response to sympathetic stimulation
in humans: importance of the functional integrity of the
endothelium. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14:11811190.[Abstract]
6.
Nabel EG. Biology of the impaired
endothelium. Am J Cardiol. 1991;68:6C8C.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Böttcher M, Czernin J, Sun KT, Phelps ME,
Schelbert HR. Effect of caffeine on myocardial blood flow at rest and
during pharmacological vasodilation. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:20162021.
8.
Benowitz NL. Drug therapy: pharmacologic aspects of
cigarette smoking and nicotine addition. N Engl J
Med. 1988;319:13181330.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Wienhard K, Dahlbom M, Eriksson L, Michel C,
Bruckbauer T, Pietrzyk U, Heiss WD. The ECAT EXACT HR:
performance of a new high resolution positron scanner.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1994;18:110118.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Czernin J, Müller P, Chan S, Brunken RC, Porenta
G, Krivokapich J, Chen K, Chan A, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Influence of
age and hemodynamics on myocardial blood flow and flow
reserve. Circulation. 1993;88:6269.
11.
Weinberg IN, Huang SC, Hoffman EJ, Araujo L, Nienaber
C, Grover-McKay M, Dahlbom M, Schelbert H. Validation of PET-acquired
functions for cardiac studies. J Nucl Med. 1988;29:241247.
12.
Kofoed KF, Czernin J, Johnson J, Kobashigawa J, Phelps
M, Laks H, Schelbert HR. Effects of cardiac allograft vasculopathy on
myocardial blood flow, vasodilatory capacity, and coronary
vasomotion. Circulation. 1997;95:600606.
13.
Di Carli MF, Tobes MC, Mangner T, Levine AB, Muzik O,
Chakroborty P, Levine TB. Effects of cardiac sympathetic innervation on
coronary blood flow. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:12081215.
14.
Hoffman EJ, Huang SC, Phelps ME. Quantitation in
positron emission computed tomography. J Comput Assist
Tomogr. 1979;3:299308.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Kuhle WG, Porenta G, Huang S-C, Buxton D, Gambhir SS,
Hansen H, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Quantification of regional
myocardial blood flow using 13N-ammonia and reoriented dynamic positron
emission tomographic imaging. Circulation. 1992;86:10041017.
16.
Kaplan LA, Pesce AJ. Clinical Chemistry: Theory,
Analysis and Correlation. 1st ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby;
1984:11951209.
17.
Farmer JA, Gotto AM. Risk Factors for
Coronary Artery Disease in Heart Disease. Philadelphia,
Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1992:11251160.
18.
National Cholesterol Education Program.
Second report of the Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and
Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult
Treatment Panel II). Circulation. 1994;89:13291445.
19.
Morrison DF. Multivariate
Statistical Methods. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1990.
20.
Demer LL, Gould KL, Goldstein RA, Kirkeeide RL, Mullani
NA, Smalling RW, Nishikawa A, Merhige ME. Assessment of
coronary artery disease severity by positron emission
tomography: comparison with quantitative arteriography in 193 patients.
Circulation. 1989;79:825835.
21.
Go RT, Marwick TH, MacIntyre WJ, Saha GB, Neumann DR,
Underwood DA, Simpfendorfer CC. A prospective comparison of rubidium-82
PET and thallium-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging utilizing a
single dipyridamole stress in the diagnosis of
coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med. 1990;31:18991905.
22.
Klocke FJ, Mates RE, Canty JM Jr, Ellis AK.
Coronary pressure-flow relationship: controversial issues and
probable implications. Circ Res. 1985;56:310323.
23.
Selwyn AP, Kinlay S, Creager M, Libby P, Ganz P. Cell
dysfunction in atherosclerosis and the ischemic
manifestations of coronary artery disease. Am J
Cardiol. 1997;79:1723.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Nabel EG, Ganz P, Gordon JB, Alexander RW, Selwyn AP.
Dilation of normal and constriction of atherosclerotic coronary
arteries caused by the cold pressor test. Circulation. 1988;77:4352.
25.
Zeiher AM, Drexler H. Coronary
hemodynamic determinants of epicardial artery vasomotor
responses during sympathetic stimulation in humans. Basic Res
Cardiol. 1991;86(suppl 2):203213.
26.
Davis JW, Shelton L, Eigenberg DA, Hignite CE, Watanabe
IS. Effects of tobacco and non-tobacco cigarette smoking on
endothelium and platelets. Clin Pharmacol
Ther. 1985;37:529533.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Kugiyama K, Yasue H, Ohgushi M, Motoyama T, Kawano H,
Inobe Y, Hirashima O, Sugiyama S. Deficiency in nitric oxide
bioactivity in epicardial coronary arteries of cigarette
smokers. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:11611167.[Abstract]
28.
Reinders JH, Brinkman HJ, van Mourik JA, de Groot PG.
Cigarette smoke impairs endothelial cell prostacyclin
production. Arteriosclerosis. 1986;6:1523.
29.
Adams MR, Jessup W, Celermajer DS. Cigarette smoking is
associated with increased human monocyte adhesion to
endothelial cells: reversibility with oral
L-arginine but not vitamin C. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 1997;29:491497.[Abstract]
30.
Morrow JD, Frei B, Longmire AW, Gaziano JM, Lynch SM,
Shyr Y, Strauss WE, Oates JA, Roberts LJ. Increase in circulating
products of lipid peroxidation (F2-isoprostanes) in smokers.
N Engl J Med. 1995;332:11981203.
31.
Murohara T, Kugiyama K, Ohgushi M, Sugiyama S, Yasue H.
Cigarette smoke extract contracts isolated porcine coronary
arteries by superoxide anion-mediated degradation. Am J
Physiol. 1994;266:H874H880.
32.
Heitzer T, Just H, Münzel T. Antioxidant vitamin
C improves endothelial dysfunction in chronic smokers.
Circulation. 1996;94:69.
33.
Gibbons GH. Endothelial function as a
determinant of vascular function and structure: a new therapeutic
target. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:38.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Meade TW, Vickers MV, Thompson SG, Stirling Y, Haines
AP, Miller GJ. Epidemiological characteristics of platelet
aggregability. BMJ. 1986;290:428432.
35.
Wilhelmsen L, Svardsudd K, Korsan-Bengtsen K, Larsson
B, Welin L, Tibblin G. Fibrinogen as a risk factor for stroke and
myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:501505.[Abstract]
36.
Czernin J, Barnard RJ, Sun KT, Krivokapich J, Nitzsche
E, Dorsey D, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Effect of short-term
cardiovascular conditioning and low-fat diet on
myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. Circulation. 1995;92:197204.
37.
Chappell SP, Lewis MJ, Henderson AH. Effect of lipid
feeding on endothelium dependent relaxation in rabbit
aortic preparations. Cardiovasc Res. 1987;21:3438.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Sellke FW, Armstrong ML, Harrison DG.
Endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation is abnormal
in the coronary microcirculation of atherosclerotic primates.
Circulation. 1990;81:15861593.
39.
Zeiher AM, Drexler H, Saurbier B, Just H.
Endothelium-mediated coronary blood flow
modulation in humans: effects of age, atherosclerosis,
hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension.
J Clin Invest. 1993;92:652662.
40.
O'Driscoll G, Green D, Taylor R.
Simvastatin, an HMG-coenzyme A reductase
inhibitor, improves endothelial function
within 1 month. Circulation. 1997;95:11261131.
41.
Creager MA, Cooke JP, Mendelsohn ME, Gallagher SJ,
Coleman SM, Loscalzo J, Dzau VJ. Impaired vasodilation of forearm
resistance vessels in hypercholesterolemic humans.
J Clin Invest. 1990;86:228234.
42.
Minor RLJ, Myers OR, Guerra RJ, Bates JN, Harrison DG.
Diet-induced atherosclerosis increases the release of
nitrogen oxides from rabbit aorta. J Clin Invest. 1990;86:21092116.
43.
Ohara Y, Peterson TE, Harrison DG.
Hypercholesterolemia increases
endothelial superoxide anion production.
J Clin Invest. 1993; 91:25462551.
44.
Darley-Usmar VM, Hogg N, O'Leary VJ, Wilson MT,
Moncada S. The simultaneous generation of superoxide and
nitric oxide can initiate lipid peroxidation in human low density
lipoprotein. Free Radic Res. 1992;17:920.
45.
Belardinelli L, Linden J, Berne RM. The cardiac effects
of adenosine. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1989;32:7397.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
46.
Czernin J, Sun K, Brunken R, Böttcher M, Phelps
ME, Schelbert HR. Effect of acute and long-term smoking on myocardial
blood flow and flow reserve. Circulation. 1995;91:28912897.
47.
Benowitz NL, Kuyt F, Jacob P III. Circadian blood
nicotine concentrations during cigarette smoking. Clin Pharmacol
Ther. 1982;32:758764.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
48.
Porenta G, Kuhle W, Czernin J, Ratib O, Brunken R,
Phelps M, Schelbert H. Semiquantitative assessment of myocardial
viability and perfusion utilizing polar map displays of cardiac PET
images. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:16281636.
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports
Effects of Long-term Smoking on Myocardial Blood Flow, Coronary Vasomotion, and Vasodilator Capacity
![]()
Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
BackgroundThe effect of long-term
smoking on coronary vasomotion and vasodilator capacity in
healthy smokers is unknown.
Key Words: blood flow smoking tomography cold pressor test
![]()
Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Long-term smoking
alters the peripheral vascular endothelial
function.1 2 However, the effects of long-term
smoking on the coronary endothelial function
remain controversial.3 4 Cigarette smoking
increases the risk for obstructive coronary artery disease.
Coronary endothelial dysfunction might precede
epicardial, obstructive atherosclerosis in long-term
smokers and other individuals at risk for coronary artery
disease.4
![]()
Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Study Population
Thirty-three individuals (16 healthy long-term smokers and 17
nonsmokers) were enrolled in this study. The group of smokers consisted
of 13 men and 3 women with a mean age of 46±10 years (range, 36 to 68
years) who had been smoking cigarettes for 23±8 years (range, 11 to 39
years; 27±13 pack-years). None of the study participants had a history
of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or familial
hyperlipidemia or was on any medication. All had normal
ECGs at rest and during pharmacological stress. All had a normal
stress/rest myocardial perfusion by PET polar map analysis. The
group of 17 healthy lifelong nonsmokers (10 men, 7 women; age, 49±9
years; range, 37 to 64 years) had no known risk factors for
coronary artery disease and served as control subjects.
Myocardial blood flow was quantified at rest, during cold
pressor testing, and during dipyridamole-induced
hyperemia using [13N]ammonia and
dynamic PET imaging. The Siemens/CTI ECAT EXACT HR positron emission
tomograph, which acquires 47 transaxial planes, was used in this
study.9 A 20-minute transmission scan was
acquired first for correction of photon
attenuation.10 After the first
intravenous injection of
[13N]ammonia (15 to 20 mCi), resting serial
transaxial images were acquired in a sequence consisting of 12 image
frames of 10 seconds, 2 frames of 30 seconds, and 1 frame of 900
seconds. The cold pressor test was performed 45 minutes later as
follows: The patient's left hand was immersed in ice water for 45
seconds before a second dose of [13N]ammonia
(15 to 20 mCi) was injected. The same image acquisition sequence used
for the baseline study was started at the time of the tracer injection.
The cold pressor test was maintained for another minute to permit
trapping of [13N]ammonia in the
myocardium. Finally, for determining the coronary
vasodilator capacity, 0.56 mg/kg dipyridamole IV was
infused over 4 minutes. [13N]ammonia (15 to 20
mCi) was injected 4 minutes after the end of the
dipyridamole infusion, and serial images were
recorded in the same sequence.
The transaxially acquired image sets were reoriented into 12
short-axis images of the left ventricle (progressing from the apex to
the base), which were assembled into polar maps of the relative
distribution of myocardial blood flow. The entire left
ventricular myocardium and the territories of
the 3 major coronary arteries (left anterior descending, left
circumflex, and right coronary arteries) were analyzed
in each participant at rest and during dipyridamole
hyperemia.
Regional myocardial blood flow was quantified in the 3 vascular
territories (left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right
coronary arteries) as described
previously.10 Then, 70° to 90° sectorial
regions of interest were placed in the 3 major coronary
vascular territories on a basal, midventricular, and apical
cross-sectional image. A small (25-mm2) region of
interest was centered in the left ventricular blood pool to
derive the arterial input function.11
The regions of interest were copied to the first 120 seconds of the
dynamic imaging sequence to obtain blood pool and myocardial
time-activity curves.
Total serum cholesterol and HDL
cholesterol were measured with enzymatic
methods.16 LDL cholesterol was
calculated mathematically.17 Total
cholesterol levels <200 mg/dL were considered normal;
cholesterol levels between 200 and 239 mg/dL were defined
as borderline; and levels >240 mg/dL were considered elevated. HDL
cholesterol
35 mg/dL was defined as normal. LDL
cholesterol values <130 mg/dL were considered normal;
values between 130 and 159 mg/dL were considered borderline; and levels
160 mg/dL were considered elevated.18
Descriptive statistics are expressed as mean±SD.
Hemodynamic measurements and myocardial blood flow at
rest, during cold pressor test, and during
dipyridamole-induced hyperemia were compared by
use of one-way ANOVA. Comparisons between groups were made by use of
the unpaired t test. The difference in the relative
proportion of women between smokers and nonsmokers was tested by
Fisher's exact test.
![]()
Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Hemodynamic Findings
Heart rate and blood pressure at baseline, during cold pressor
testing, and during dipyridamole-induced
hyperemia are listed in Table 1
.
At baseline, systolic, diastolic, and mean
arterial blood pressures were higher in smokers than in
nonsmokers (P<0.02). However, the rate-pressure product
was similar for both groups. Smokers and nonsmokers responded to cold
with significant increases in systolic and mean
arterial blood pressure and rate-pressure product,
whereas heart rate increased only in smokers. Heart rate and
rate-pressure product increased to similar degrees during
dipyridamole-induced hyperemia in the 2
groups.
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 1. Hemodynamic Responses to Cold
Pressor Test and Dipyridamole Infusion
Visual inspection and polar map analysis of the myocardial
[13N]ammonia distribution at rest and during
dipyridamole hyperemia revealed
homogeneous tracer uptake in smokers and nonsmokers. No
perfusion defects were identified. The absence of other risk factors
(except for smoking in the smoking group), together with the normal
[13N]ammonia stress and rest perfusion images,
indicated a low likelihood for coronary artery disease in all
participants.20 21
Myocardial blood flow at baseline did not differ between the 2
groups (0.68±0.14 versus 0.68±0.13 mL ·
g-1 · min-1,
P=NS). However, myocardial blood flow increased during cold
pressor testing only in nonsmokers (0.91±0.18 mL ·
g-1 · min-1,
P<0.05) but not in smokers (0.78±0.14 mL ·
g-1 · min-1,
P=NS; Table 2
). Thus,
myocardial blood flow during cold pressor testing was about 16% lower
in smokers than in nonsmokers (P<0.05).
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 2. Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements
).

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Figure 1. Normalized myocardial blood flow response to cold in smokers
(left) and nonsmokers (right). The normalized myocardial blood flow
response to cold remained unchanged in nonsmokers but significantly
declined in smokers. MBF indicates myocardial blood flow; RPP,
rate-pressure product; and CPT, cold pressor testing.
The hyperemic blood flow response to
dipyridamole (1.92±0.38 versus 2.04±0.47 mL ·
g-1 · min-1,
P=NS; Table 2
) was similar in smokers and nonsmokers.
Myocardial flow reserve defined as the ratio of hyperemic to
resting blood flow (2.88±0.61 versus 3.06±0.58, P=NS) did
not differ between the 2 groups. Because dipyridamole
uncouples flow from cardiac work, the hyperemic flows were not
corrected for rate-pressure product.
An index of coronary vascular resistance was calculated as
the ratio of mean arterial blood pressure (millimeters of
mercury) to myocardial blood flow (milliliters per gram per minute). At
rest, this index did not differ between smokers and nonsmokers. The
coronary vascular resistance remained unchanged during cold in
smokers and nonsmokers (141±23 versus 147±23 and 128±26 versus
115±27 mm Hg · mL ·
g-1 · min-1,
P=NS, respectively). However, the coronary vascular
resistance during cold was higher in smokers than in nonsmokers,
(147±23 versus 115±27 mm Hg · mL ·
g-1 · min-1,
P=0.0009).
None of the participants enrolled in the nonsmoking group
had elevated total cholesterol levels (12 were considered
to have normal and 5 to have borderline measurements), 4 had HDL <35
mg/dL, 3 had borderline LDL values, and 2 had elevated LDL
measurements. In the smoking group, 11 had normal total
cholesterol levels, 3 had borderline levels, and 2 had
elevated levels. Eight smokers had HDL values <35 mg/dL, 1 had
borderline LDL levels, and 3 had elevated LDL values.
The discriminant analysis revealed that the normalized
blood flow response to cold was the variable with the strongest
relationship to cigarette smoking (discriminant equation: Z
equals 5.839 times normalized blood flow response to cold minus 4.953;
P<0.001). Therefore, to determine the relationship between
the normalized blood flow response to cold and independent
variables such as age, sex, total cholesterol, HDL or
HDL/LDL ratio, years of smoking, or pack-years, a stepwise multiple
regression analysis was performed. This analysis
included all 33 participants and revealed a negative correlation
between the normalized blood flow during cold and years of smoking
(normalized blood flow during cold equals 0.7386 minus 0.00792 times
years of smoking; P<0.001). In addition, it uncovered a
positive correlation between normalized blood flow during cold and the
HDL/LDL ratio (normalized blood flow during cold equals 0.7386 plus
0.5285 times HDL/LDL; multiple R=0.65; P<0.001).
The strongest predictor for the normalized blood flow response to cold
was the years of smoking (F value, 11.37), followed by the HDL/LDL
ratio (F value, 7.40).
![]()
Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
The current study demonstrates that the myocardial blood flow
response to cold is impaired in "healthy" long-term smokers and
that the degree of this impairment correlates best with the number of
years of smoking. Interestingly, low HDL/LDL ratios were also
independently correlated with an abnormal blood flow response to cold.
These findings imply that long-term smoking and mild alterations in
serum lipid levels affect coronary vasomotion in otherwise
apparently healthy individuals.
Abnormalities in coronary vasomotion in response to
coronary risk factors such as smoking, hypertension,
hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and age are thought
to precede coronary
atherosclerosis.23 A significant
correlation between the coronary vasomotor response to
intracoronary acetylcholine and that to cold pressor testing
has been demonstrated in patients with mild
atherosclerosis.5 Therefore, cold
pressor testing has been proposed as a noninvasive tool to probe
endothelium-dependent coronary
vasomotion.6
1
and
2, myocardial ß1
(indirect vasodilation), coronary ß2
(direct vasodilation), and endothelial adrenergic
2-receptors (indirect coronary
vasodilation).24 In individuals with preserved
endothelial function, the smooth muscle cell
2-receptormediated vasoconstriction is
presumably opposed by endothelial
2-receptormediated release of nitric oxide,
causing smooth muscle relaxation. Together with stimulation of
coronary and myocardial ß-receptors, the net result is an
increase in coronary blood flow. This complex balance between
vasoconstrictor and vasodilator effects appears to be altered in
endothelial dysfunction, in which coronary
vasoconstriction occurs in response to cold pressor
testing.3 25
The HDL/LDL ratio was the only other risk factor for
coronary artery disease that independently predicted the
normalized blood flow response to cold. In particular, the normalized
flow response to cold was impaired in the presence of low HDL/LDL
ratios. A close correlation between abnormal serum lipid levels and
endothelial dysfunction has been demonstrated in animal
experimental37 38 and clinical
studies.39 40 41 Decreased activity of
endothelial derived nitric
oxide,42 excessive free radical
production,43 or increased oxidation of
LDL44 might explain the
endothelial dysfunction in
hypercholesterolemic patients. Our study supports the
concept that even mild alterations in serum cholesterol
profiles induce coronary endothelial
dysfunction independent of other risk factors for coronary
artery disease such as age, male sex, or cigarette
smoking.23
Dipyridamole induces coronary vasodilation
by increases in the interstitial concentration of
adenosine, a potent endogenous coronary
vasodilator.45 This mechanism is generally
considered endothelium independent. The myocardial
blood flow response to dipyridamole was preserved in
healthy adult long-term smokers in the present study. This is
consistent with a previous report from our laboratory that
demonstrated a normal hyperemic response to
dipyridamole in healthy young volunteers with
relatively short histories of smoking.46 Thus,
endothelium-independent coronary vasodilator
capacity is preserved in long-term smokers.
First, the blood flow measurements in long-term smokers could have
been affected by short-term nicotine effects. Nicotine evokes the
release of catecholamines with subsequent adrenergically
mediated increases in cardiac work and coronary blood flow.
However, the smokers abstained from smoking for at least 4 hours before
the PET study. This time interval is sufficient to reduce serum
nicotine levels to nearly unmeasurable levels.8
Moreover, we ascertained that the smokers had indeed refrained from
smoking by randomly measuring serum nicotine levels in 7 of the 16
smokers before the PET study. Five had unmeasurable levels, and 2 had
levels of 10 and 15 ng/mL. These levels are substantially lower than
those reported by Benowitz et al,47 who described
that peak nicotine concentrations while smoking the usual brand of
cigarette ranged from 18.4 to 55.1 ng/mL. In addition, Czernin et
al46 previously demonstrated that short-term
smoking increases the baseline myocardial blood flow and attenuates the
hyperemic response to dipyridamole. Yet in the
current study, both resting and hyperemic blood flows did not
differ between long-term smokers and nonsmokers. Both observations
confirm that smokers in fact refrained from smoking for some time
before the PET study and argue against as an explanation for the
abnormal blood flow response to cold in the present study.
Smoking and, to a lesser degree, reduced HDL/LDL ratios predict
abnormalities in the myocardial blood flow response to cold, suggesting
a defect located at the level of the coronary
endothelium. The severity of
endothelial dysfunction is associated with the total
duration of smoking. The abnormalities in coronary function as
detected by quantitative PET imaging might represent an early
stage of coronary artery disease in long-term smokers.
![]()
Acknowledgments
The UCLA Laboratory of Structural Biology & Molecular Medicine
is operated for the US Department of Energy by the University of
California under contract DE-FC0387ER60615. This work was supported
in part by the Director of the Office of Energy Research, Office of
Health and Environmental Research, Washington, DC, by research grant;
by grant HL-33177, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md; and by
an Investigative Group Award by the Greater Los Angeles (Calif)
Affiliate of the American Heart Association. Dr Schöder is
supported in part by the German Academic Exchange Service, document
number D/94/20528, and the German Academy of Nature Scientists
Leopoldina. We thank Ron Sumida, Larry Pang, Francine Aguilar, Der-Jenn
Liu, Priscilla Contreras, and Sumon Wongpiya for their excellent
technical assistance in performing the PET studies and Dr N.
Satyamurthy and his cyclotron staff for production of the
[13N]ammonia. We also thank Deborah Dorsey, RN,
for her assistance; Diane Martin for preparing the artwork; and Eileen
Rosenfeld for preparing this manuscript.
![]()
References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
1.
Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Georgakopoulos D, Bull
C, Thomas O, Robinson J, Deanfield JE. Cigarette smoking is
associated with dose-related and potentially reversible impairment of
endothelium-dependent dilation in healthy young adults.
Circulation. 1993;88:21492155.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. M. Bengel, T. Higuchi, M. S. Javadi, and R. Lautamaki Cardiac positron emission tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 30, 2009; 54(1): 1 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. T. Range, M. Paul, K. P. Schafers, T. Acil, P. Kies, S. Hermann, O. Schober, G. Breithardt, T. Wichter, and M. A. Schafers Myocardial Perfusion in Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy With and Without Atrial Fibrillation J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2009; 50(3): 390 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Mendes, G. Horvath, P. Rebolledo, M. E. Monzon, S. M. Casalino-Matsuda, and A. Wanner Effect of an inhaled glucocorticoid on endothelial function in healthy smokers J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2008; 105(1): 54 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S. Bowman, J. M. Gaziano, J. E. Buring, and H. D. Sesso A Prospective Study of Cigarette Smoking and Risk of Incident Hypertension in Women J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 20, 2007; 50(21): 2085 - 2092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. T. Range, M. Schafers, T. Acil, K. P. Schafers, P. Kies, M. Paul, S. Hermann, B. Brisse, G. Breithardt, O. Schober, et al. Impaired myocardial perfusion and perfusion reserve associated with increased coronary resistance in persistent idiopathic atrial fibrillation Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2007; 28(18): 2223 - 2230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Morita, T. Tsukamoto, M. Naya, K. Noriyasu, M. Inubushi, T. Shiga, C. Katoh, Y. Kuge, H. Tsutsui, and N. Tamaki Smoking Cessation Normalizes Coronary Endothelial Vasomotor Response Assessed with 15O-Water and PET in Healthy Young Smokers J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2006; 47(12): 1914 - 1920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. T. Siegrist, O. Gaemperli, P. Koepfli, T. Schepis, M. Namdar, I. Valenta, F. Aiello, S. Fleischmann, H. Alkadhi, and P. A. Kaufmann Repeatability of Cold Pressor Test-Induced Flow Increase Assessed with H215O and PET J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 1420 - 1426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wang, M. Jerosch-Herold, D. R. Jacobs Jr, E. Shahar, and A. R. Folsom Coronary Risk Factors and Myocardial Perfusion in Asymptomatic Adults: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 7, 2006; 47(3): 565 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. O. Prior, M. J. Quinones, M. Hernandez-Pampaloni, A. D. Facta, T. H. Schindler, J. W. Sayre, W. A. Hsueh, and H. R. Schelbert Coronary Circulatory Dysfunction in Insulin Resistance, Impaired Glucose Tolerance, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Circulation, May 10, 2005; 111(18): 2291 - 2298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Voci, F. Pizzuto, and F. Romeo Coronary flow: a new asset for the echo lab? Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2004; 25(21): 1867 - 1879. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Quinones, M. Hernandez-Pampaloni, H. Schelbert, I. Bulnes-Enriquez, X. Jimenez, G. Hernandez, R. De La Rosa, Y. Chon, H. Yang, S. B. Nicholas, et al. Coronary Vasomotor Abnormalities in Insulin-Resistant Individuals Ann Intern Med, May 4, 2004; 140(9): 700 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gellman, J. M. Hare, C. J. Lowenstein, G. Gerstenblith, V. Coombs, P. Langenberg, J. A. Brinker, and J. R. Resar L-Arginine Ameliorates the Abnormal Sympathetic Response of the Dysfunctional Human Coronary Microvasculature Angiology, January 1, 2004; 55(1): 1 - 8. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Bazzano, J. He, P. Muntner, S. Vupputuri, and P. K. Whelton Relationship between Cigarette Smoking and Novel Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease in the United States Ann Intern Med, June 3, 2003; 138(11): 891 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Schmidt, A. Chakrabarti, Q. Shamim-Uzzaman, N. Kaciroti, R. A. Koeppe, and S. Rajagopalan Calf Flow Reserve with H215O PET as a Quantifiable Index of Lower Extremity Flow J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2003; 44(6): 915 - 919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Bartel, Y. a Yang, S. Muller, R. R. Wenzel, D. Baumgart, T. Philipp, and R. Erbel Noninvasive assessment of microvascular function in arterial hypertension by transthoracic doppler harmonic echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 19, 2002; 39(12): 2012 - 2018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Furuyama, Y. Odagawa, C. Katoh, Y. Iwado, K. Yoshinaga, Y. Ito, K. Noriyasu, M. Mabuchi, Y. Kuge, K. Kobayashi, et al. Assessment of Coronary Function in Children With a History of Kawasaki Disease Using 15O-Water Positron Emission Tomography Circulation, June 18, 2002; 105(24): 2878 - 2884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hernandez-Pampaloni, F. Y.J. Keng, T. Kudo, J. S. Sayre, and H. R. Schelbert Abnormal Longitudinal, Base-to-Apex Myocardial Perfusion Gradient by Quantitative Blood Flow Measurements in Patients With Coronary Risk Factors Circulation, July 31, 2001; 104(5): 527 - 532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nitenberg, S. Ledoux, P. Valensi, R. Sachs, J.-R. Attali, and I. Antony Impairment of Coronary Microvascular Dilation in Response to Cold Pressor-Induced Sympathetic Stimulation in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Abnormal Stress Thallium Imaging Diabetes, May 1, 2001; 50(5): 1180 - 1185. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Taira, T. B. Seto, K. K. L. Ho, H. M. Krumholz, D. E. Cutlip, R. Berezin, R. E. Kuntz, and D. J. Cohen Impact of Smoking on Health-Related Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization Circulation, September 19, 2000; 102(12): 1369 - 1374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wieneke, M. Haude, J. Ge, C. Altmann, S. Kaiser, D. Baumgart, C. von Birgelen, D. Welge, and R. Erbel Corrected coronary flow velocity reserve: a new concept for assessing coronary perfusion J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 2000; 35(7): 1713 - 1720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Schoder, D. H. Silverman, R. Campisi, J. W. Sayre, M. E. Phelps, H. R. Schelbert, and J. Czernin Regulation of myocardial blood flow response to mental stress in healthy individuals Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2000; 278(2): H360 - H366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bottcher, H. E. Botker, H. Sonne, T. T. Nielsen, and J. Czernin Endothelium-Dependent and -Independent Perfusion Reserve and the Effect of L-arginine on Myocardial Perfusion in Patients With Syndrome X Circulation, April 13, 1999; 99(14): 1795 - 1801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Campisi, J. Czernin, H. Schoder, J. W. Sayre, and H. R. Schelbert L-Arginine Normalizes Coronary Vasomotion in Long-Term Smokers Circulation, February 2, 1999; 99(4): 491 - 497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |