Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1998;98:119-125

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Campisi, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schelbert, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Campisi, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schelbert, H. R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Smoking

(Circulation. 1998;98:119-125.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Effects of Long-term Smoking on Myocardial Blood Flow, Coronary Vasomotion, and Vasodilator Capacity

Roxana Campisi, MD; Johannes Czernin, MD; Heiko Schöder, MD; James W. Sayre, PhD; Fernando D. Marengo, PhD; Michael E. Phelps, PhD; ; Heinrich R. Schelbert, MD

From Ahmanson Biological Imaging Clinic/Nuclear Medicine, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology and Department of Physiology (F.D.M.), UCLA School of Medicine and Laboratory of Structural Biology & Molecular Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.

Correspondence to Johannes Czernin, MD, Ahmanson Biological Imaging Clinic/Nuclear Medicine, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA School of Medicine, AR-259 CHS, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6948. E-mail jczernin{at}mail.nuc.ucla.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—The effect of long-term smoking on coronary vasomotion and vasodilator capacity in healthy smokers is unknown.

Methods and Results—Myocardial blood flow (MBF) was quantified with [13N]ammonia and positron emission tomography (PET) at rest, during cold pressor testing (endothelium-dependent vasomotion), and during dipyridamole-induced hyperemia in 16 long-term smokers and 17 nonsmokers. MBF at rest did not differ between the 2 groups. Cold induced similar increases in rate-pressure product (RPP) in smokers and nonsmokers. However, MBF increased only in nonsmokers and was, during cold, higher than in smokers (0.91±0.18 versus 0.78±0.14 mL · g-1 · min-1, P<0.05). MBF normalized to the RPP (derived from the ratio of MBF ([milliliters per gram per minute] to RPP [beats per minute times millimeters of mercury] times 10 000) declined in smokers but remained unchanged in nonsmokers (0.86±0.10 versus 0.72±0.11, P=0.0006, and 0.99±0.25 versus 0.96±0.27, P=NS). The hyperemic response to dipyridamole and the myocardial flow reserve did not differ between the 2 groups. In a multiple regression model adjusted for age, sex, serum lipid levels, years of smoking, and pack-years, years of smoking was the strongest predictor of the normalized blood flow response to cold (P<0.001), followed by the HDL/LDL ratio.

Conclusions—The normal hyperemic response to dipyridamole in long-term smokers indicates a preserved endothelium-independent coronary vascular smooth muscle relaxation, whereas the abnormal response to cold suggests a defect in coronary vasomotion likely located at the level of the coronary endothelium. Its severity depends on the total exposure time to smoking.


Key Words: blood flow • smoking • tomography • cold pressor test


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Long-term smoking alters the peripheral vascular endothelial function.1 2 However, the effects of long-term smoking on the coronary endothelial function remain controversial.3 4 Cigarette smoking increases the risk for obstructive coronary artery disease. Coronary endothelial dysfunction might precede epicardial, obstructive atherosclerosis in long-term smokers and other individuals at risk for coronary artery disease.4

Until recently, assessment of coronary endothelial function in humans required intracoronary administration of acetylcholine. However, Zeiher et al5 reported a significant correlation between the vasomotor responses to intracoronary acetylcholine and cold pressor testing in patients with mild atherosclerosis, suggesting that cold pressor testing might be useful for probing endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotion.6 Dynamic, high spatial and temporal resolution positron emission tomography (PET) imaging permits the noninvasive quantification of myocardial blood flow. Thus, the effects of interventions such as cold pressor testing or intravenous dipyridamole as probes of coronary vasomotor function can be evaluated noninvasively. The myocardial blood flow responses to these interventions might serve as indexes of endothelium-dependent and -independent coronary vasomotion.

Therefore, the aim of the current study was to determine noninvasively with [13N]ammonia PET imaging whether long-term smoking affects coronary vasomotion and vasodilator capacity in smokers without evidence of epicardial coronary artery disease.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Study Population
Thirty-three individuals (16 healthy long-term smokers and 17 nonsmokers) were enrolled in this study. The group of smokers consisted of 13 men and 3 women with a mean age of 46±10 years (range, 36 to 68 years) who had been smoking cigarettes for 23±8 years (range, 11 to 39 years; 27±13 pack-years). None of the study participants had a history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or familial hyperlipidemia or was on any medication. All had normal ECGs at rest and during pharmacological stress. All had a normal stress/rest myocardial perfusion by PET polar map analysis. The group of 17 healthy lifelong nonsmokers (10 men, 7 women; age, 49±9 years; range, 37 to 64 years) had no known risk factors for coronary artery disease and served as control subjects.

All individuals refrained from intake of caffeine-containing food or beverages for at least 24 hours before the PET study.7 The smokers abstained from smoking for at least 4 hours before the PET study.8 Each participant signed an informed consent form approved by the Human Subject Protection Committee of the University of California, Los Angeles.

Positron Emission Tomography
Myocardial blood flow was quantified at rest, during cold pressor testing, and during dipyridamole-induced hyperemia using [13N]ammonia and dynamic PET imaging. The Siemens/CTI ECAT EXACT HR positron emission tomograph, which acquires 47 transaxial planes, was used in this study.9 A 20-minute transmission scan was acquired first for correction of photon attenuation.10 After the first intravenous injection of [13N]ammonia (15 to 20 mCi), resting serial transaxial images were acquired in a sequence consisting of 12 image frames of 10 seconds, 2 frames of 30 seconds, and 1 frame of 900 seconds. The cold pressor test was performed 45 minutes later as follows: The patient's left hand was immersed in ice water for 45 seconds before a second dose of [13N]ammonia (15 to 20 mCi) was injected. The same image acquisition sequence used for the baseline study was started at the time of the tracer injection. The cold pressor test was maintained for another minute to permit trapping of [13N]ammonia in the myocardium. Finally, for determining the coronary vasodilator capacity, 0.56 mg/kg dipyridamole IV was infused over 4 minutes. [13N]ammonia (15 to 20 mCi) was injected 4 minutes after the end of the dipyridamole infusion, and serial images were recorded in the same sequence.

Heart rate, arterial blood pressure, and 12-lead ECG were recorded continuously throughout the study. Heart rate and the arterial blood pressure obtained during the first 2 minutes of each dynamic image acquisition sequence were averaged and used to calculate the rate-pressure product as an index of cardiac work.

Semiquantitative Analysis
The transaxially acquired image sets were reoriented into 12 short-axis images of the left ventricle (progressing from the apex to the base), which were assembled into polar maps of the relative distribution of myocardial blood flow. The entire left ventricular myocardium and the territories of the 3 major coronary arteries (left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries) were analyzed in each participant at rest and during dipyridamole hyperemia.

Normal myocardial perfusion was defined as an [13N]ammonia uptake within 2 SD of the normal mean for both rest and dipyridamole images. To rule out blood flow defects and thus significant coronary artery disease in the study participants, the polar maps were compared with a database of 20 normal individuals previously established at our institution.

Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow
Regional myocardial blood flow was quantified in the 3 vascular territories (left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries) as described previously.10 Then, 70° to 90° sectorial regions of interest were placed in the 3 major coronary vascular territories on a basal, midventricular, and apical cross-sectional image. A small (25-mm2) region of interest was centered in the left ventricular blood pool to derive the arterial input function.11 The regions of interest were copied to the first 120 seconds of the dynamic imaging sequence to obtain blood pool and myocardial time-activity curves.

A single time-activity curve was obtained for each vascular territory by averaging the time activity data from the 3 short-axis planes. Because myocardial blood flow did not differ between vascular territories, a single measurement of myocardial blood flow was obtained by averaging the territorial time activity data.10 12 13

Partial volume effects were corrected by use of a recovery coefficient that assumes a uniform left ventricular wall thickness of 1 cm.14 Both the blood pool and myocardial time-activity curves were corrected for physical decay and were fitted to a previously validated two-compartment tracer kinetic model that corrects for spillover of activity from the blood pool into the left ventricular myocardium.15

Serum Lipid Measurements
Total serum cholesterol and HDL cholesterol were measured with enzymatic methods.16 LDL cholesterol was calculated mathematically.17 Total cholesterol levels <200 mg/dL were considered normal; cholesterol levels between 200 and 239 mg/dL were defined as borderline; and levels >240 mg/dL were considered elevated. HDL cholesterol >=35 mg/dL was defined as normal. LDL cholesterol values <130 mg/dL were considered normal; values between 130 and 159 mg/dL were considered borderline; and levels >=160 mg/dL were considered elevated.18

Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics are expressed as mean±SD. Hemodynamic measurements and myocardial blood flow at rest, during cold pressor test, and during dipyridamole-induced hyperemia were compared by use of one-way ANOVA. Comparisons between groups were made by use of the unpaired t test. The difference in the relative proportion of women between smokers and nonsmokers was tested by Fisher's exact test.

Discriminant and logistic regression analyses were performed to assess relationships between cigarette smoking and myocardial blood flow at rest, resting blood flow normalized to the rate-pressure product, myocardial blood flow during cold pressor, cold pressor blood flow normalized to the rate-pressure product, and myocardial blood flow during dipyridamole-induced hyperemia.19 This analysis revealed that the normalized myocardial blood flow response to cold was the only variable that discriminated between smokers and nonsmokers. Therefore, a stepwise and all-possible-subset multiple regression was used to evaluate the relationship between normalized blood flow response during cold (the dependent variable) and independent variables such as age, sex, total cholesterol, HDL or HDL/LDL, years of smoking, or pack-years in all 33 participants. Of note, when HDL was included as a variable in a subset, the HDL/LDL ratio was not present and vice versa. Also, when pack-years was present in a subset, years of smoking was not included and vice versa. Thus, our mathematical model accounted for the possibility of covariance of these factors. From these subsets, the one with the independent variables that yielded the highest multiple R was selected for the multiple regression equation. Values of P<0.05 were considered significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Hemodynamic Findings
Heart rate and blood pressure at baseline, during cold pressor testing, and during dipyridamole-induced hyperemia are listed in Table 1Down. At baseline, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressures were higher in smokers than in nonsmokers (P<0.02). However, the rate-pressure product was similar for both groups. Smokers and nonsmokers responded to cold with significant increases in systolic and mean arterial blood pressure and rate-pressure product, whereas heart rate increased only in smokers. Heart rate and rate-pressure product increased to similar degrees during dipyridamole-induced hyperemia in the 2 groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Hemodynamic Responses to Cold Pressor Test and Dipyridamole Infusion

Semiquantitative Analysis of PET Images
Visual inspection and polar map analysis of the myocardial [13N]ammonia distribution at rest and during dipyridamole hyperemia revealed homogeneous tracer uptake in smokers and nonsmokers. No perfusion defects were identified. The absence of other risk factors (except for smoking in the smoking group), together with the normal [13N]ammonia stress and rest perfusion images, indicated a low likelihood for coronary artery disease in all participants.20 21

Myocardial Blood Flow and Coronary Vasomotion
Myocardial blood flow at baseline did not differ between the 2 groups (0.68±0.14 versus 0.68±0.13 mL · g-1 · min-1, P=NS). However, myocardial blood flow increased during cold pressor testing only in nonsmokers (0.91±0.18 mL · g-1 · min-1, P<0.05) but not in smokers (0.78±0.14 mL · g-1 · min-1, P=NS; Table 2Down). Thus, myocardial blood flow during cold pressor testing was about 16% lower in smokers than in nonsmokers (P<0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements

The magnitude of the blood flow response to cold varied between participants (from a 20% decrease to a 103% increase). Resting myocardial blood flow is correlated linearly to the rate-pressure product as an index of cardiac work.10,22 Cold-induced increases in rate-pressure product also remained significantly correlated to changes in blood flow in nonsmokers (y=15.54+0.53xx; r=0.63; P<0.008). To account for interindividual differences in the flow response to cold, myocardial blood flow was therefore normalized to the rate-pressure product at rest and during cold pressor testing in both groups. Normalized myocardial blood flow was derived from the ratio of blood flow (milliliters per gram per minute) to the rate-pressure product (beats per minute times millimeters of mercury) times 10 000. Despite similar rate-pressure products at rest and during cold in smokers and nonsmokers, normalized myocardial blood flow declined in smokers but remained unchanged in nonsmokers (0.86±0.10 versus 0.72±0.11, P=0.0006, and 0.99±0.25 versus 0.96±0.27, P=NS; the FigureDown).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Normalized myocardial blood flow response to cold in smokers (left) and nonsmokers (right). The normalized myocardial blood flow response to cold remained unchanged in nonsmokers but significantly declined in smokers. MBF indicates myocardial blood flow; RPP, rate-pressure product; and CPT, cold pressor testing.

Hyperemic Blood Flow and Flow Reserve
The hyperemic blood flow response to dipyridamole (1.92±0.38 versus 2.04±0.47 mL · g-1 · min-1, P=NS; Table 2Up) was similar in smokers and nonsmokers. Myocardial flow reserve defined as the ratio of hyperemic to resting blood flow (2.88±0.61 versus 3.06±0.58, P=NS) did not differ between the 2 groups. Because dipyridamole uncouples flow from cardiac work, the hyperemic flows were not corrected for rate-pressure product.

Coronary Vascular Resistance
An index of coronary vascular resistance was calculated as the ratio of mean arterial blood pressure (millimeters of mercury) to myocardial blood flow (milliliters per gram per minute). At rest, this index did not differ between smokers and nonsmokers. The coronary vascular resistance remained unchanged during cold in smokers and nonsmokers (141±23 versus 147±23 and 128±26 versus 115±27 mm Hg · mL · g-1 · min-1, P=NS, respectively). However, the coronary vascular resistance during cold was higher in smokers than in nonsmokers, (147±23 versus 115±27 mm Hg · mL · g-1 · min-1, P=0.0009).

To relate the hyperemic blood flow to one of its major determinants (the coronary driving pressure), the minimal coronary vascular resistance was calculated. The minimal coronary resistance during dipyridamole infusion did not differ between the 2 groups (52±12 versus 46±12 mm Hg · mL · g-1 · min-1, P=0.2).

Serum Lipid Measurements
None of the participants enrolled in the nonsmoking group had elevated total cholesterol levels (12 were considered to have normal and 5 to have borderline measurements), 4 had HDL <35 mg/dL, 3 had borderline LDL values, and 2 had elevated LDL measurements. In the smoking group, 11 had normal total cholesterol levels, 3 had borderline levels, and 2 had elevated levels. Eight smokers had HDL values <35 mg/dL, 1 had borderline LDL levels, and 3 had elevated LDL values.

The average levels of total and LDL cholesterol did not differ between smokers and nonsmokers (187±40 versus 188±35 and 120±36 versus 117±33 mg/dL, P=NS, respectively). HDL tended to be lower in smokers (36±10 versus 44±14 mg/dL, P=0.07), whereas the HDL/LDL ratio did not differ between the 2 groups (0.34±0.15 versus 0.41±0.21, P=NS).

Discriminant and Multivariate Analyses
The discriminant analysis revealed that the normalized blood flow response to cold was the variable with the strongest relationship to cigarette smoking (discriminant equation: Z equals 5.839 times normalized blood flow response to cold minus 4.953; P<0.001). Therefore, to determine the relationship between the normalized blood flow response to cold and independent variables such as age, sex, total cholesterol, HDL or HDL/LDL ratio, years of smoking, or pack-years, a stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed. This analysis included all 33 participants and revealed a negative correlation between the normalized blood flow during cold and years of smoking (normalized blood flow during cold equals 0.7386 minus 0.00792 times years of smoking; P<0.001). In addition, it uncovered a positive correlation between normalized blood flow during cold and the HDL/LDL ratio (normalized blood flow during cold equals 0.7386 plus 0.5285 times HDL/LDL; multiple R=0.65; P<0.001). The strongest predictor for the normalized blood flow response to cold was the years of smoking (F value, 11.37), followed by the HDL/LDL ratio (F value, 7.40).

None of the other variables such as age (F value, 0.35; P=0.63), sex (F value, 0.95; P=0.60), total cholesterol (F value, 4.05; P=0.46), HDL (F value, 4.30; P=0.78), and pack-years (F value, 8.46; P=0.67) was predictive of the normalized myocardial blood flow response to cold.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The current study demonstrates that the myocardial blood flow response to cold is impaired in "healthy" long-term smokers and that the degree of this impairment correlates best with the number of years of smoking. Interestingly, low HDL/LDL ratios were also independently correlated with an abnormal blood flow response to cold. These findings imply that long-term smoking and mild alterations in serum lipid levels affect coronary vasomotion in otherwise apparently healthy individuals.

Effects of Smoking on Endothelium-Dependent Coronary Vasomotion
Abnormalities in coronary vasomotion in response to coronary risk factors such as smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and age are thought to precede coronary atherosclerosis.23 A significant correlation between the coronary vasomotor response to intracoronary acetylcholine and that to cold pressor testing has been demonstrated in patients with mild atherosclerosis.5 Therefore, cold pressor testing has been proposed as a noninvasive tool to probe endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotion.6

Cold pressor testing evokes a mixed nervous response via stimulation of coronary vasoconstrictor adrenergic {alpha}1 and {alpha}2, myocardial ß1 (indirect vasodilation), coronary ß2 (direct vasodilation), and endothelial adrenergic {alpha}2-receptors (indirect coronary vasodilation).24 In individuals with preserved endothelial function, the smooth muscle cell {alpha}2-receptor–mediated vasoconstriction is presumably opposed by endothelial {alpha}2-receptor–mediated release of nitric oxide, causing smooth muscle relaxation. Together with stimulation of coronary and myocardial ß-receptors, the net result is an increase in coronary blood flow. This complex balance between vasoconstrictor and vasodilator effects appears to be altered in endothelial dysfunction, in which coronary vasoconstriction occurs in response to cold pressor testing.3 25

Several mechanisms might account for the smoking-induced alterations in coronary endothelial function. Smoking is associated with a direct toxic effect on human endothelial cells,26 27 reduces endothelial prostacyclin production,28 and increases leukocyte adhesion to endothelial cells,29 which is an early event in the atherosclerotic process. Cigarette smoke contains a large number of oxidants, and recent observations described a role of oxygen-derived free radicals in mediating endothelial dysfunction,30 31 which can be modulated by the potent antioxidant vitamin C.32 Alternatively, smoking increases endothelial angiotensin II production, which reduces nitric oxide activity that might contribute to endothelial dysfunction in smokers.33 Increased platelet aggregation26 and serum fibrinogen,34 as well as decreased serum plasminogen levels35 known to occur in smokers, might also impair endothelial function in smokers.

In the present study, systolic and mean arterial blood pressures were higher in smokers than in nonsmokers at baseline and during cold pressor testing. However, the rate-pressure product, as an index of cardiac work, did not differ between the 2 groups. Cold failed to increase myocardial blood flow in long-term smokers despite similar increases in rate-pressure product in smokers and nonsmokers. Thus, the different blood flow responses to cold cannot be accounted for by differences in the hemodynamic responses between the groups.

Differences in lifestyle between the 2 study groups might have affected our observations. As demonstrated previously, short-term cardiovascular conditioning lowers the resting rate-pressure product, serum cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol in healthy individuals. Furthermore, cardiovascular conditioning improves myocardial flow reserve by lowering resting blood flow and increasing the coronary vasodilator capacity.36 In the present study, no differences in cardiac work at rest or in serum lipid levels were found between smokers and nonsmokers. In addition, myocardial flow reserve was similar in both groups. Thus, the abnormal coronary vasomotion in response to cold observed in long-term smokers is unlikely to be attributable to differences in lifestyles between the 2 study groups.

Estrogen also might affect coronary vasomotor function and thus flow responses to cold pressor testing. However, the current study population consisted of 16 smokers (13 men and 3 women) and 17 nonsmokers (10 men and 7 women). The relative proportion of women was similar for the 2 groups (P=0.26). In the smoking group, 2 women were postmenopausal and 1 women was premenopausal. In the nonsmoking group, 4 women were postmenopausal and 3 were premenopausal. Of note, none of the women enrolled was under estrogen-replacement therapy or contraceptive medication. Thus, only 4 of 33 participants might have exhibited some effect of estrogen on myocardial blood flow. In addition, the multivariate analysis failed to identify an effect of sex on the myocardial blood flow response to cold.

In the absence of any significant intergroup differences and together with previous observations (as described above), the abnormal blood flow response to cold in the long-term smokers observed in the current study most likely resulted from coronary endothelial dysfunction.

The current investigation expands the findings of previous clinical studies that reported that the degree of abnormalities in peripheral arterial vasomotion was correlated with the duration of cigarette smoking.1 This implies a progressive impairment in coronary endothelial function as a consequence of smoking; whether it indicates progression of preclinical coronary artery disease has yet to be determined.

Effect of Serum Cholesterol on the Myocardial Blood Flow Response to Cold
The HDL/LDL ratio was the only other risk factor for coronary artery disease that independently predicted the normalized blood flow response to cold. In particular, the normalized flow response to cold was impaired in the presence of low HDL/LDL ratios. A close correlation between abnormal serum lipid levels and endothelial dysfunction has been demonstrated in animal experimental37 38 and clinical studies.39 40 41 Decreased activity of endothelial derived nitric oxide,42 excessive free radical production,43 or increased oxidation of LDL44 might explain the endothelial dysfunction in hypercholesterolemic patients. Our study supports the concept that even mild alterations in serum cholesterol profiles induce coronary endothelial dysfunction independent of other risk factors for coronary artery disease such as age, male sex, or cigarette smoking.23

Effects of Smoking on Endothelium-Independent Coronary Vasomotion
Dipyridamole induces coronary vasodilation by increases in the interstitial concentration of adenosine, a potent endogenous coronary vasodilator.45 This mechanism is generally considered endothelium independent. The myocardial blood flow response to dipyridamole was preserved in healthy adult long-term smokers in the present study. This is consistent with a previous report from our laboratory that demonstrated a normal hyperemic response to dipyridamole in healthy young volunteers with relatively short histories of smoking.46 Thus, endothelium-independent coronary vasodilator capacity is preserved in long-term smokers.

Study Limitations
First, the blood flow measurements in long-term smokers could have been affected by short-term nicotine effects. Nicotine evokes the release of catecholamines with subsequent adrenergically mediated increases in cardiac work and coronary blood flow. However, the smokers abstained from smoking for at least 4 hours before the PET study. This time interval is sufficient to reduce serum nicotine levels to nearly unmeasurable levels.8 Moreover, we ascertained that the smokers had indeed refrained from smoking by randomly measuring serum nicotine levels in 7 of the 16 smokers before the PET study. Five had unmeasurable levels, and 2 had levels of 10 and 15 ng/mL. These levels are substantially lower than those reported by Benowitz et al,47 who described that peak nicotine concentrations while smoking the usual brand of cigarette ranged from 18.4 to 55.1 ng/mL. In addition, Czernin et al46 previously demonstrated that short-term smoking increases the baseline myocardial blood flow and attenuates the hyperemic response to dipyridamole. Yet in the current study, both resting and hyperemic blood flows did not differ between long-term smokers and nonsmokers. Both observations confirm that smokers in fact refrained from smoking for some time before the PET study and argue against as an explanation for the abnormal blood flow response to cold in the present study.

Second, the uptake of [13N]ammonia during the cold pressor test was homogeneous in smokers and nonsmokers by visual analysis. Polar maps of the relative [13N]ammonia tracer distribution were generated for the myocardial blood flow study during cold pressor testing. However, because no normal database for the relative [13N]ammonia distribution during cold pressor testing was available, these polar maps were normalized to the peak 5% of activity within each map as described previously.48 This analysis revealed homogeneous tracer distribution throughout all 3 vascular territories during cold in both groups. Thus, smokers did not exhibit a greater degree of heterogeneity in relative myocardial perfusion than nonsmokers. Absolute flow values during cold pressor testing were similar in the 3 vascular territories in smokers and nonsmokers.

Third, flow-limiting coronary artery disease might have affected the blood flow response to cold in long-term smokers. Coronary artery disease could have been ruled out with certainty only through coronary arteriography, which seemed unjustified in these asymptomatic individuals. However, dipyridamole stress testing did not reveal any perfusion defects, a finding that argues against flow-limiting coronary artery disease in both the smokers and nonsmokers enrolled in the present study.20 21

Finally, the correction for partial volume effects, which assumes a uniform myocardial wall thickness of 1 cm, might have introduced a systematic error in the blood flow measurements.14 On the basis of phantom studies, partial volume effects were corrected for by use of a recovery coefficient of 0.73. Assuming that wall thickness remained constant between studies, a systematic error in correcting for partial volume would have equally affected all 3 blood flow measurements.

Conclusions
Smoking and, to a lesser degree, reduced HDL/LDL ratios predict abnormalities in the myocardial blood flow response to cold, suggesting a defect located at the level of the coronary endothelium. The severity of endothelial dysfunction is associated with the total duration of smoking. The abnormalities in coronary function as detected by quantitative PET imaging might represent an early stage of coronary artery disease in long-term smokers.


*    Acknowledgments
 
The UCLA Laboratory of Structural Biology & Molecular Medicine is operated for the US Department of Energy by the University of California under contract DE-FC03–87ER60615. This work was supported in part by the Director of the Office of Energy Research, Office of Health and Environmental Research, Washington, DC, by research grant; by grant HL-33177, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md; and by an Investigative Group Award by the Greater Los Angeles (Calif) Affiliate of the American Heart Association. Dr Schöder is supported in part by the German Academic Exchange Service, document number D/94/20528, and the German Academy of Nature Scientists Leopoldina. We thank Ron Sumida, Larry Pang, Francine Aguilar, Der-Jenn Liu, Priscilla Contreras, and Sumon Wongpiya for their excellent technical assistance in performing the PET studies and Dr N. Satyamurthy and his cyclotron staff for production of the [13N]ammonia. We also thank Deborah Dorsey, RN, for her assistance; Diane Martin for preparing the artwork; and Eileen Rosenfeld for preparing this manuscript.

Received January 7, 1998; revision received March 2, 1998; accepted March 17, 1998.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Georgakopoulos D, Bull C, Thomas O, Robinson J, Deanfield JE. Cigarette smoking is associated with dose-related and potentially reversible impairment of endothelium-dependent dilation in healthy young adults. Circulation. 1993;88:2149–2155.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Kiowski W, Linder L, Stoschitsky K, Pfisterer M, Burckhardt D, Burkart F, Bühler FR. Diminished vascular response to inhibition of endothelium-derived nitric oxide and enhanced vasoconstriction to exogenously administered endothelin-1 in clinically healthy smokers. Circulation. 1994;90:27–34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Vita JA, Treasure CB, Nabel EG, McLenachan JM, Fish RD, Yeung AC, Vekshtein VI, Selwyn AP, Ganz P. Coronary vasomotor response to acetylcholine relates to risk factors for coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1990;81:491–497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Zeiher AM, Schaechinger V, Minners J. Long-term cigarette smoking impairs endothelium-dependent coronary arterial vasodilator function. Circulation. 1995;92:1094–1100.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Zeiher A, Drexler H, Wollschlaeger H, Saurbier B, Just H. Coronary vasomotion in response to sympathetic stimulation in humans: importance of the functional integrity of the endothelium. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14:1181–1190.[Abstract]

6. Nabel EG. Biology of the impaired endothelium. Am J Cardiol. 1991;68:6C–8C.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Böttcher M, Czernin J, Sun KT, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Effect of caffeine on myocardial blood flow at rest and during pharmacological vasodilation. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:2016–2021.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Benowitz NL. Drug therapy: pharmacologic aspects of cigarette smoking and nicotine addition. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:1318–1330.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Wienhard K, Dahlbom M, Eriksson L, Michel C, Bruckbauer T, Pietrzyk U, Heiss WD. The ECAT EXACT HR: performance of a new high resolution positron scanner. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1994;18:110–118.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Czernin J, Müller P, Chan S, Brunken RC, Porenta G, Krivokapich J, Chen K, Chan A, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Influence of age and hemodynamics on myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. Circulation. 1993;88:62–69.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Weinberg IN, Huang SC, Hoffman EJ, Araujo L, Nienaber C, Grover-McKay M, Dahlbom M, Schelbert H. Validation of PET-acquired functions for cardiac studies. J Nucl Med. 1988;29:241–247.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Kofoed KF, Czernin J, Johnson J, Kobashigawa J, Phelps M, Laks H, Schelbert HR. Effects of cardiac allograft vasculopathy on myocardial blood flow, vasodilatory capacity, and coronary vasomotion. Circulation. 1997;95:600–606.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Di Carli MF, Tobes MC, Mangner T, Levine AB, Muzik O, Chakroborty P, Levine TB. Effects of cardiac sympathetic innervation on coronary blood flow. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1208–1215.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Hoffman EJ, Huang SC, Phelps ME. Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1979;3:299–308.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Kuhle WG, Porenta G, Huang S-C, Buxton D, Gambhir SS, Hansen H, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow using 13N-ammonia and reoriented dynamic positron emission tomographic imaging. Circulation. 1992;86:1004–1017.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Kaplan LA, Pesce AJ. Clinical Chemistry: Theory, Analysis and Correlation. 1st ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1984:1195–1209.

17. Farmer JA, Gotto AM. Risk Factors for Coronary Artery Disease in Heart Disease. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1992:1125–1160.

18. National Cholesterol Education Program. Second report of the Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II). Circulation. 1994;89:1329–1445.

19. Morrison DF. Multivariate Statistical Methods. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1990.

20. Demer LL, Gould KL, Goldstein RA, Kirkeeide RL, Mullani NA, Smalling RW, Nishikawa A, Merhige ME. Assessment of coronary artery disease severity by positron emission tomography: comparison with quantitative arteriography in 193 patients. Circulation. 1989;79:825–835.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Go RT, Marwick TH, MacIntyre WJ, Saha GB, Neumann DR, Underwood DA, Simpfendorfer CC. A prospective comparison of rubidium-82 PET and thallium-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging utilizing a single dipyridamole stress in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med. 1990;31:1899–1905.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Klocke FJ, Mates RE, Canty JM Jr, Ellis AK. Coronary pressure-flow relationship: controversial issues and probable implications. Circ Res. 1985;56:310–323.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Selwyn AP, Kinlay S, Creager M, Libby P, Ganz P. Cell dysfunction in atherosclerosis and the ischemic manifestations of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:17–23.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Nabel EG, Ganz P, Gordon JB, Alexander RW, Selwyn AP. Dilation of normal and constriction of atherosclerotic coronary arteries caused by the cold pressor test. Circulation. 1988;77:43–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Zeiher AM, Drexler H. Coronary hemodynamic determinants of epicardial artery vasomotor responses during sympathetic stimulation in humans. Basic Res Cardiol. 1991;86(suppl 2):203–213.

26. Davis JW, Shelton L, Eigenberg DA, Hignite CE, Watanabe IS. Effects of tobacco and non-tobacco cigarette smoking on endothelium and platelets. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1985;37:529–533.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Kugiyama K, Yasue H, Ohgushi M, Motoyama T, Kawano H, Inobe Y, Hirashima O, Sugiyama S. Deficiency in nitric oxide bioactivity in epicardial coronary arteries of cigarette smokers. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:1161–1167.[Abstract]

28. Reinders JH, Brinkman HJ, van Mourik JA, de Groot PG. Cigarette smoke impairs endothelial cell prostacyclin production. Arteriosclerosis. 1986;6:15–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Adams MR, Jessup W, Celermajer DS. Cigarette smoking is associated with increased human monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells: reversibility with oral L-arginine but not vitamin C. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:491–497.[Abstract]

30. Morrow JD, Frei B, Longmire AW, Gaziano JM, Lynch SM, Shyr Y, Strauss WE, Oates JA, Roberts LJ. Increase in circulating products of lipid peroxidation (F2-isoprostanes) in smokers. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:1198–1203.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Murohara T, Kugiyama K, Ohgushi M, Sugiyama S, Yasue H. Cigarette smoke extract contracts isolated porcine coronary arteries by superoxide anion-mediated degradation. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:H874–H880.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Heitzer T, Just H, Münzel T. Antioxidant vitamin C improves endothelial dysfunction in chronic smokers. Circulation. 1996;94:6–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Gibbons GH. Endothelial function as a determinant of vascular function and structure: a new therapeutic target. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:3–8.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Meade TW, Vickers MV, Thompson SG, Stirling Y, Haines AP, Miller GJ. Epidemiological characteristics of platelet aggregability. BMJ. 1986;290:428–432.

35. Wilhelmsen L, Svardsudd K, Korsan-Bengtsen K, Larsson B, Welin L, Tibblin G. Fibrinogen as a risk factor for stroke and myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:501–505.[Abstract]

36. Czernin J, Barnard RJ, Sun KT, Krivokapich J, Nitzsche E, Dorsey D, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Effect of short-term cardiovascular conditioning and low-fat diet on myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. Circulation. 1995;92:197–204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Chappell SP, Lewis MJ, Henderson AH. Effect of lipid feeding on endothelium dependent relaxation in rabbit aortic preparations. Cardiovasc Res. 1987;21:34–38.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Sellke FW, Armstrong ML, Harrison DG. Endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation is abnormal in the coronary microcirculation of atherosclerotic primates. Circulation. 1990;81:1586–1593.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Zeiher AM, Drexler H, Saurbier B, Just H. Endothelium-mediated coronary blood flow modulation in humans: effects of age, atherosclerosis, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension. J Clin Invest. 1993;92:652–662.

40. O'Driscoll G, Green D, Taylor R. Simvastatin, an HMG-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, improves endothelial function within 1 month. Circulation. 1997;95:1126–1131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Creager MA, Cooke JP, Mendelsohn ME, Gallagher SJ, Coleman SM, Loscalzo J, Dzau VJ. Impaired vasodilation of forearm resistance vessels in hypercholesterolemic humans. J Clin Invest. 1990;86:228–234.

42. Minor RLJ, Myers OR, Guerra RJ, Bates JN, Harrison DG. Diet-induced atherosclerosis increases the release of nitrogen oxides from rabbit aorta. J Clin Invest. 1990;86:2109–2116.

43. Ohara Y, Peterson TE, Harrison DG. Hypercholesterolemia increases endothelial superoxide anion production. J Clin Invest. 1993; 91:2546–2551.

44. Darley-Usmar VM, Hogg N, O'Leary VJ, Wilson MT, Moncada S. The simultaneous generation of superoxide and nitric oxide can initiate lipid peroxidation in human low density lipoprotein. Free Radic Res. 1992;17:9–20.

45. Belardinelli L, Linden J, Berne RM. The cardiac effects of adenosine. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1989;32:73–97.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

46. Czernin J, Sun K, Brunken R, Böttcher M, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Effect of acute and long-term smoking on myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. Circulation. 1995;91:2891–2897.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

47. Benowitz NL, Kuyt F, Jacob P III. Circadian blood nicotine concentrations during cigarette smoking. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1982;32:758–764.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

48. Porenta G, Kuhle W, Czernin J, Ratib O, Brunken R, Phelps M, Schelbert H. Semiquantitative assessment of myocardial viability and perfusion utilizing polar map displays of cardiac PET images. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:1628–1636.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
F. M. Bengel, T. Higuchi, M. S. Javadi, and R. Lautamaki
Cardiac positron emission tomography.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 30, 2009; 54(1): 1 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
F. T. Range, M. Paul, K. P. Schafers, T. Acil, P. Kies, S. Hermann, O. Schober, G. Breithardt, T. Wichter, and M. A. Schafers
Myocardial Perfusion in Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy With and Without Atrial Fibrillation
J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2009; 50(3): 390 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
E. S. Mendes, G. Horvath, P. Rebolledo, M. E. Monzon, S. M. Casalino-Matsuda, and A. Wanner
Effect of an inhaled glucocorticoid on endothelial function in healthy smokers
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2008; 105(1): 54 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. S. Bowman, J. M. Gaziano, J. E. Buring, and H. D. Sesso
A Prospective Study of Cigarette Smoking and Risk of Incident Hypertension in Women
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 20, 2007; 50(21): 2085 - 2092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
F. T. Range, M. Schafers, T. Acil, K. P. Schafers, P. Kies, M. Paul, S. Hermann, B. Brisse, G. Breithardt, O. Schober, et al.
Impaired myocardial perfusion and perfusion reserve associated with increased coronary resistance in persistent idiopathic atrial fibrillation
Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2007; 28(18): 2223 - 2230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
K. Morita, T. Tsukamoto, M. Naya, K. Noriyasu, M. Inubushi, T. Shiga, C. Katoh, Y. Kuge, H. Tsutsui, and N. Tamaki
Smoking Cessation Normalizes Coronary Endothelial Vasomotor Response Assessed with 15O-Water and PET in Healthy Young Smokers
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2006; 47(12): 1914 - 1920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
P. T. Siegrist, O. Gaemperli, P. Koepfli, T. Schepis, M. Namdar, I. Valenta, F. Aiello, S. Fleischmann, H. Alkadhi, and P. A. Kaufmann
Repeatability of Cold Pressor Test-Induced Flow Increase Assessed with H215O and PET
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 1420 - 1426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. Wang, M. Jerosch-Herold, D. R. Jacobs Jr, E. Shahar, and A. R. Folsom
Coronary Risk Factors and Myocardial Perfusion in Asymptomatic Adults: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 7, 2006; 47(3): 565 - 572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. O. Prior, M. J. Quinones, M. Hernandez-Pampaloni, A. D. Facta, T. H. Schindler, J. W. Sayre, W. A. Hsueh, and H. R. Schelbert
Coronary Circulatory Dysfunction in Insulin Resistance, Impaired Glucose Tolerance, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Circulation, May 10, 2005; 111(18): 2291 - 2298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Voci, F. Pizzuto, and F. Romeo
Coronary flow: a new asset for the echo lab?
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2004; 25(21): 1867 - 1879.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. J. Quinones, M. Hernandez-Pampaloni, H. Schelbert, I. Bulnes-Enriquez, X. Jimenez, G. Hernandez, R. De La Rosa, Y. Chon, H. Yang, S. B. Nicholas, et al.
Coronary Vasomotor Abnormalities in Insulin-Resistant Individuals
Ann Intern Med, May 4, 2004; 140(9): 700 - 708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
J. Gellman, J. M. Hare, C. J. Lowenstein, G. Gerstenblith, V. Coombs, P. Langenberg, J. A. Brinker, and J. R. Resar
L-Arginine Ameliorates the Abnormal Sympathetic Response of the Dysfunctional Human Coronary Microvasculature
Angiology, January 1, 2004; 55(1): 1 - 8.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
L. A. Bazzano, J. He, P. Muntner, S. Vupputuri, and P. K. Whelton
Relationship between Cigarette Smoking and Novel Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease in the United States
Ann Intern Med, June 3, 2003; 138(11): 891 - 897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. A. Schmidt, A. Chakrabarti, Q. Shamim-Uzzaman, N. Kaciroti, R. A. Koeppe, and S. Rajagopalan
Calf Flow Reserve with H215O PET as a Quantifiable Index of Lower Extremity Flow
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2003; 44(6): 915 - 919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. Bartel, Y. a Yang, S. Muller, R. R. Wenzel, D. Baumgart, T. Philipp, and R. Erbel
Noninvasive assessment of microvascular function in arterial hypertension by transthoracic doppler harmonic echocardiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 19, 2002; 39(12): 2012 - 2018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Furuyama, Y. Odagawa, C. Katoh, Y. Iwado, K. Yoshinaga, Y. Ito, K. Noriyasu, M. Mabuchi, Y. Kuge, K. Kobayashi, et al.
Assessment of Coronary Function in Children With a History of Kawasaki Disease Using 15O-Water Positron Emission Tomography
Circulation, June 18, 2002; 105(24): 2878 - 2884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Hernandez-Pampaloni, F. Y.J. Keng, T. Kudo, J. S. Sayre, and H. R. Schelbert
Abnormal Longitudinal, Base-to-Apex Myocardial Perfusion Gradient by Quantitative Blood Flow Measurements in Patients With Coronary Risk Factors
Circulation, July 31, 2001; 104(5): 527 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
A. Nitenberg, S. Ledoux, P. Valensi, R. Sachs, J.-R. Attali, and I. Antony
Impairment of Coronary Microvascular Dilation in Response to Cold Pressor-Induced Sympathetic Stimulation in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Abnormal Stress Thallium Imaging
Diabetes, May 1, 2001; 50(5): 1180 - 1185.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. A. Taira, T. B. Seto, K. K. L. Ho, H. M. Krumholz, D. E. Cutlip, R. Berezin, R. E. Kuntz, and D. J. Cohen
Impact of Smoking on Health-Related Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization
Circulation, September 19, 2000; 102(12): 1369 - 1374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. Wieneke, M. Haude, J. Ge, C. Altmann, S. Kaiser, D. Baumgart, C. von Birgelen, D. Welge, and R. Erbel
Corrected coronary flow velocity reserve: a new concept for assessing coronary perfusion
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 2000; 35(7): 1713 - 1720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
H. Schoder, D. H. Silverman, R. Campisi, J. W. Sayre, M. E. Phelps, H. R. Schelbert, and J. Czernin
Regulation of myocardial blood flow response to mental stress in healthy individuals
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2000; 278(2): H360 - H366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Bottcher, H. E. Botker, H. Sonne, T. T. Nielsen, and J. Czernin
Endothelium-Dependent and -Independent Perfusion Reserve and the Effect of L-arginine on Myocardial Perfusion in Patients With Syndrome X
Circulation, April 13, 1999; 99(14): 1795 - 1801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. Campisi, J. Czernin, H. Schoder, J. W. Sayre, and H. R. Schelbert
L-Arginine Normalizes Coronary Vasomotion in Long-Term Smokers
Circulation, February 2, 1999; 99(4): 491 - 497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Campisi, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schelbert, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Campisi, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schelbert, H. R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Smoking