| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cardiology
Section, Houston, Tex.
Methods and ResultsWe enrolled 33 symptomatic
patients with HOCM and obstruction (
ConclusionsEchocardiography-guided ethanol
septal reduction in patients with HOCM is a safe, minimally invasive
procedure that provides symptomatic relief with improved
hemodynamic and left ventricular
parameters.
Recently, infusion of ethanol into the septal branches of the left
anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) to specifically
induce necrosis of the hypertrophied septum has been reported as an
ameliorative measure for HOCM.7 In this study, we
report the results of echocardiography-guided,
catheter procedurebased ethanol septal reduction in 33 patients with
HOCM and severe, refractory symptoms. This therapeutic modality is
potentially a new landmark in the treatment of this disease.
Procedure
Patients were examined by the principal investigator at 6 weeks (33
patients) and 6 months (11 patients). Echocardiographic
evaluation with Doppler and dobutamine provocation and
myocardial perfusion tomography with treadmill exercise or
pharmacological stress were also done with the previously described
methods.
Data Analysis
Radionuclide Imaging
Statistical Analysis
Effect of Septal Reduction on Symptoms
Twenty-three patients were able and agreed to undergo a baseline
treadmill exercise test (Bruce protocol). The mean exercise time in
this selected group of patients was 286±193 seconds. At 6 weeks, the
mean exercise time increased in the same group of patients to 422±181
seconds (P=0.03).
ECG Findings
Plasma CK Profile Due to Septal Injury
Effects of Septal Reduction on Hemodynamics
The baseline dobutamine-provoked gradient was 96±34
mm Hg. It decreased to 24±31 mm Hg at 6 weeks (n=33) and
40±43 mm Hg (n=11) at 6 months (P<0.001 for both).
All patients showed a reduction of the dobutamine-provoked
gradient.
Effect of Septal Reduction on Left Ventricular
Parameters
Quantitative Assessment of Septal Reduction by SPECT
Untoward Effects of Ethanol
In this study, we evaluated the effect of
echocardiography-guided, catheter-based ethanol
septal reduction in 33 patients with symptomatic HOCM.
Echocardiography provided a uniform method to
measure the gradient before, during, and after the procedure. In
addition, selective injections of Albunex into the septal artery before
ethanol therapy provided direct echocardiographic
visualization and localization of the area to be infarcted and allowed
precise selection of the correct septal branch(es) with the greatest
blood supply to the hypertrophied septal segment. This approach
resulted in limiting both the number of arteries injected and the
volume of ethanol used per patient without compromising the efficacy of
our therapy.
Patients had marked resolution of their symptoms at discharge and on
follow-up at 6 weeks and 6 months (11 patients). Associated with
symptomatic improvement, we observed a major reduction in
the LVOT gradient at rest and after dobutamine provocation
coupled with a significant improvement in duration of exercise. These
results are extremely encouraging; however, one cannot rule out a
possible placebo effect, because we did not have a placebo treatment
arm for comparison.
Our study demonstrates for the first time that ethanol septal reduction
results in significant left ventricular changes that
explain the symptomatic improvement and the reduction of
the pressure gradients. Using echocardiographic
measurements, we found a 28% reduction in septal thickness and an
associated 17% reduction in left ventricular mass (as
determined by the area-length method, which erroneously assumes the
presence of uniform ventricular hypertrophy in
patients with HOCM). These changes resulted in
ventricular remodeling, with an increase in the left
ventricular end-diastolic minor diameter
measured in the parasternal views and a similar increase in
end-diastolic volume.
Using nuclear studies, we demonstrated that the induced infarct
resulted in a scar localized to the upper and middle septal areas, as
planned, with no residual ischemia. The defect size was small
and was sharply localized to the septal regions. This finding is
consistent with the concept that it is important to localize
the particular septal branch that serves the area of the septum
responsible for the obstruction. This localization was greatly
facilitated by use of contrast echocardiography to
identify the segment of the septum supplied by the catheterized septal
artery.
In this study, a surprisingly high percentage of our patients initially
had persistent heart block for >3 days after the procedure, requiring
placement of permanent pacemakers. Seggewiss et
al24 reported this complication 10 minutes
to 5 days after the procedure in 12 of 24 of their patients. Complete
heart block persisted in only 4 of their patients. In comparison,
Knight et al25 reported only transient complete
heart block in 4 of their 18 patients, and none required permanent
pacemaker placement. One possible explanation for the initial high
incidence of this complication could be that our patients had more
conduction abnormalities at baseline, and they may have progressed to
complete heart block more readily by the ethanol-induced infarct. In
addition, a more extensive infarct may have resulted in damaging the
vital blood supply to the septal branches supplying the bundle of His
and/or the bundle branches. However, after modifying our technique by
using contrast echocardiography and injecting
alcohol at a slower rate (1 mL/min) into the septal arteries, we
achieved the same reduction in LVOT gradient with less AV block.
Interestingly, we found that permanent dual-chamber pacing does not
confer any additional therapeutic effects to ethanol septal reduction,
especially if complete ablation could be achieved.
Conclusions
Guest editor for this article was Eugene Braunwald, MD, Partners HealthCare System, Inc, Boston, Mass.
Received December 29, 1997;
revision received June 25, 1998;
accepted June 26, 1998.
2.
Spirito P, Seidman C, McKenna W, Maron B. The
management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
N Engl J Med. 1997;336:775785.
3.
Frank MJ, Abdullah AM, Canedo MI, Saylors RE. Longterm
medical management of hypertrophic obstructive
cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1978;42:9931001.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Robbins RC, Stinson EB, Daily PO. Long-term results of
myotomy and myectomy for hypertrophic obstructive
cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc
Surg. 1996;111:586594.
5.
Kappenberger L, Linde C, McKenna W, Meisel E, Aliot A,
Chajnouska L, Guize M, Jeanrenaud X, Gras D. Pacing in hypertrophic
obstructive cardiomyopathy (PIC): a randomized
crossover study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;29(suppl
A):387A. Abstract.
6.
Fananapazir L, Canon RO III, Tripodi D, Panza JA.
Impact of dual chamber permanent pacing in patients with obstructive
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with symptoms
refractory to verapamil and ß-adrenergic blocker
therapy. Circulation. 1992;85:21492161.
7.
Sigwart U. Nonsurgical myocardial reduction for
hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
Lancet. 1995;346:211214.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Puleo PR, Meyer D, Wathen C, Roberts R. Use of rapid
assay of subforms of creatine kinase MB to diagnose or rule out acute
myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:561566.
9.
Tortoledo FA, Quinones MA, Fernandez GC, Waggoner AD,
Winters WL Jr. Quantitation of left ventricular volumes by
two-dimensional echocardiography: a simplified and
accurate approach. Circulation. 1983;67:579584.
10.
Quinones MA, Waggoner AD, Reduto L. A new, simplified
and accurate method for determining ejection fraction with
two-dimensional echocardiography.
Circulation. 1981;64:744749.
11.
Reicheck N, Plappert T, Sutton MS, Weber KT. Anatomic
validation of left ventricular mass estimates from clinical
two-dimensional echocardiography: initial results.
Circulation. 1983;67:348352.
12.
Sasson Z, Yock PG, Hatle LK, Alderman EL, Popp RL.
Doppler echocardiographic determination of the
pressure gradient in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:752756.[Abstract]
13.
Mahmarian JJ, Boyce TM, Goldberg RK, Roberts R, Verani
MS. Quantitative exercise thallium-201 single photon emission
tomography for the enhanced diagnosis of ischemic heart
disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:318329.[Abstract]
14.
Maron BJ, Bonow RO, Cannon RO III, Leon MB, Epstein SE.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: interrelations of
clinical manifestations, pathophysiology and therapy. N Engl
J Med. 1987;316:780789, 844852.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Maron BJ, Spirito P, Wesley Y, Arce J. Development and
progression of left ventricular hypertrophy in
children with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
N Engl J Med. 1986;315:610614.[Abstract]
16.
Wigle ED, Rakowski H, Kimball BP, Williams WG.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: clinical spectrum and
treatment. Circulation. 1995;92:16801692.
17.
McCully RB, Nishimura RA, Tajik AJ. Extent of surgical
improvement after surgical treatment of hypertrophic obstructive
cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1996;94:467471.
18.
Morrow AG, Reitz BA, Epstein SE, Henry WL, Conkle DM,
Itscoitz SB, Redwood DR. Operative treatment in hypertrophic subaortic
stenosis: techniques, and the results of pre- and
post-operative assessment in 83 patients. Circulation. 1975;52:88102.
19.
Mohr R, Schaff HV, Danielson GK, Puga FJ, Pluth JR,
Tajik AJ. The outcome of surgical treatment of hypertrophic obstructive
cardiomyopathy: experience over 15 years.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;97:666674.[Abstract]
20.
Cooper MM, McIntosh CL, Tucker E, Clark RE. Operation
for hypertrophic subaortic stenosis in the aged. Am
Thorac Surg. 1978;44:370378.[Abstract]
21.
Nishimura RA, Trusty JM, Hayes DL. Dual chamber pacing
for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: a
randomized, double blind, crossover study. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 1997;29:435441.[Abstract]
22.
Sigwart U, Grbie M, Essinger A, Rivier JL. L'effet
aigu d'une occlusion coronarienne par ballonet de la dilatation
transluminale. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1982;45:1631.
Abstract.
23.
Geitzen F, Lenner C, Gerenkamp T, Kuhn H. Relief of
obstruction in hypertrophic obstructive
cardiomyopathy by transient occlusion of the first
septal branch of the left anterior coronary artery. Eur
Heart J. 1994;15:125. Abstract.
24.
Seggewiss H, Gleichmann U, Faber L, Fassbender D,
Schmidt HK, Strick S. Catheter treatment of hypertrophic obstructive
cardiomyopathy: acute and mid-term results.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:387A. Abstract.
25.
Knight C, Kurbaan AS, Seggewiss H, Sigwart U.
Non-surgical septal reduction for hypertrophic obstructive
cardiomyopathy: outcome in the first series of
patients. Circulation. 1997;95:20752081.
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports
Echocardiography-Guided Ethanol Septal Reduction for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy
![]()
Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
BackgroundLeft
ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction is frequently
responsible for symptoms in hypertrophic obstructive
cardiomyopathy (HOCM). Medical therapy is often not
sufficient to control these symptoms, and surgical myotomy-myomectomy
is required.
40 mm Hg gradient at rest
or
60 mm Hg dobutamine-provoked). By contrast
echocardiography, the bulging septum was localized
and infarcted by injection of 2 to 5 mL of absolute ethanol into the
septal artery(ies) supplying the hypertrophied area. Baseline
echocardiograms with Doppler, myocardial perfusion tomograms, and
treadmill exercise or pharmacological testing were compared with those
at 6 weeks and 6 months. The mean rise in creatine kinase was 1964±796
U. All patients experienced symptomatic relief; NYHA class
decreased from 3.0±0.5 to 0.9±0.6 (P<0.001). Exercise
time increased from 286±193 to 421±181 seconds
(P=0.03). The resting and
dobutamine-provoked gradient decreased from 49±33 and
96±34 mm Hg to 9±19 (P<0.001) and 24±31
mm Hg (P<0.001), respectively. Echocardiograms
repeated at 6 weeks after the procedure showed a 28% reduction in
septal thickness and 17% reduction in left ventricular
mass. Myocardial perfusion imaging showed a "septal amputation
pattern," with scarring in the upper and middle septal areas.
Complete heart block developed in 11 patients, who then required
permanent pacemaker implantation.
Key Words: hypertrophy cardiomyopathy ethanol contrast media echocardiography
![]()
Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Hypertrophic obstructive
cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is a relatively common
genetic malformation of the heart, with an estimated prevalence
approaching 1 in 500 of the population.1 2 As a
result of asymmetric septal hypertrophy, left
ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction may develop
and may contribute to symptoms such as dyspnea, angina, and syncope.
Treatment to relieve the obstruction consists of medications such as
ß-blockers and calcium channel blockers3 or
surgical myotomy-myomectomy of the septum for patients with refractory
symptoms.4 Although the surgical approach results
in resolution of symptoms in most cases, it is associated with
significant morbidity and mortality. Dual-chamber pacemakers have been
reported to reduce the gradient and improve the symptoms in these
patients; however, the results of the currently published studies
continue to be inconclusive.5 6
![]()
Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Evaluation
Patients were evaluated by the primary investigator (W.H.S.)
before the procedure. Only patients with severe, drug-resistant
symptoms of congestive heart failure (NYHA class III or IV), angina
(Canadian Cardiovascular Society class III or
IV), or syncope were considered. After clinical evaluation, all
candidate patients underwent echocardiographic
evaluation with Doppler studies. Images were taken with the patient
in the left lateral position with a 2.5/3.5-MHz transducer of a
Hewlett-Packard Sonos 2000 or an Accuson XP-128 ultrasound system.
Parasternal long-axis and short-axis views were acquired first and were
followed by the apical views. All enrolled patients had a septal to
posterior wall ratio of
1.3. With the guidance of color Doppler,
LVOT gradient was recorded with continuous-wave Doppler. Care
was taken to avoid contamination by any mitral
regurgitation jet. Patients with a resting gradient of
40 mm Hg were enrolled. When the resting LVOT gradient was
<40 mm Hg, intravenous dobutamine was
started at 5 µg · kg-1 ·
min-1 and increased stepwise to a maximum of 40
µg · kg-1 ·
min-1 as necessary. Patients were enrolled in
the study if their dobutamine-provoked gradient was
60 mm Hg. Images were recorded on VHS videotape for
subsequent playback and analysis. Exercise or pharmacological
stress with myocardial perfusion was also performed before and at 6
weeks after septal infarction.
Informed consent was obtained from each patient before
enrollment in the study, according to a protocol approved by the
institutional review board at Baylor College of Medicine. On the day of
the study, a baseline ECG was performed. Blood was collected for
creatine kinase (CK) enzyme and MB isoforms both before and at 4-hour
intervals up to 36 hours after the procedure. The total CK and the
CK-MB activity were assayed according to a method developed at our
institution.8 All patients underwent
coronary angiography. Patients with significant
coronary artery disease (>50% stenosis in the LAD)
were excluded. A temporary pacemaker was placed in the apex of the
right ventricle in all except 7 patients who already had a permanent
dual-chamber pacemaker in place. A multipurpose catheter was advanced
through the aortic valve into the apex of the left ventricle, and the
intraventricular gradient was measured by the
pull-back technique (Figure 1
). An 8F
guiding catheter was then engaged in the ostium of the left main
coronary artery. Initial angiography was done to localize the
origin of the septal arteries (Figure 2
).
All patients were then sedated with benzodiazepines and analgesics. A
2.0x10.0-mm balloon catheter was introduced over a 0.014-in standard
wire into the septal perforator and inflated. With the balloon
inflated, the LVOT gradient was measured by Doppler
echocardiography, as previously described in the
text. Contrast (Omnipaque, Winthrop) was injected through the
balloon lumen to delineate the area supplied by the septal branch and
to ensure that balloon inflation prevented spillage into the LAD
(Figure 2
). The procedure was modified after the 10th patient: for
contrast echocardiography, 1.5 mL Albunex
(Mallinckrodt) diluted in an equal volume of saline was injected to
delineate the area to be infarcted (Figure 3
). Depending on the septal artery size
and the septal thickness, 2 to 5 mL of absolute ethanol was instilled
through the lumen of the inflated balloon catheter and left in place
for 5 minutes. Ethanol injections were given as a bolus in the first 17
patients; however, the technique was later modified, and in the
remainder of the patients, ethanol was injected at 1 mL/min. After
balloon deflation and removal, angiography was performed to confirm the
patency of the LAD and the occlusion of the target septal branch.
Measurement of the LVOT gradient was again performed by
echocardiography. Other septal branches were
injected in a similar manner if the gradient did not decrease to
<16 mm Hg with the first ablation. A 6F multipurpose catheter
was then advanced to the left ventricle to measure the final residual
gradient (Figure 1
). The temporary pacemaker was sutured in place.
Patients were observed in the coronary care unit for at least
24 hours. The pacemaker lead was then removed, and if there was no
high-degree atrioventricular (AV) block, the patients
were transferred to an ECG telemetry unit for the remainder of their
stay (usually 24 hours).

View larger version (92K):
[in a new window]
Figure 1. Example from patient with LVOT gradient of 70
mm Hg and classic aortic "spike-and-dome" configuration before
septal infarction (top), with complete resolution of gradient and
normalization of aortic tracing after septal infarction (bottom).

View larger version (84K):
[in a new window]
Figure 2. Coronary angiography before alcohol
therapy showing target septal arteries (A) and contrast injection
during balloon occlusion (B) showing smaller branches of septal artery
and verifying no spillage to LAD.

View larger version (71K):
[in a new window]
Figure 3. Apical 4-chamber view of heart showing
hypertrophied septum before (left) and after (right) Albunex injection
into target septal branch delineating area to be infarcted. SW
indicates septal wall; LW, lateral wall; RV, right ventricle;
LV, left ventricle; RA, right atrium; and LA, left atrium.
Echocardiographic Studies
The left ventricular minor dimension (D) was
measured in the parasternal long-axis view at both end
diastole and end systole. The long-axis dimension (L) was
taken from the apical views. For both measurements, care was taken to
avoid beats with foreshortening of the left ventricle.
End-diastolic volume was calculated from the equation
EDV=(3.42xDxL)-6, which has been previously validated in our
laboratory,9 and the ejection fraction was
derived with the multiple-diameter method.10
Basal septal and posterior wall thicknesses were also measured from the
parasternal views, and the left ventricular mass was
calculated with the area-length method.11 LVOT
gradient was derived with the modified Bernoulli equation:
gradient=4V2, where V is the maximum velocity
recorded in the LVOT.12
Stress myocardial single photon emission CT (SPECT) was
performed according to previously described methods at our
institution.13 Quantification of
myocardial perfusion defect size was performed with computer-generated
polar maps. The raw polar maps for each patient were compared with a
corresponding normal data bank to determine the size of the left
ventricular perfusion defect and the extent of scar and
ischemia. Myocardial SPECT images were quantitatively and
qualitatively interpreted by an expert nuclear cardiologist. Abnormal
myocardial tomograms were defined by visually abnormal slices in the
short-axis, horizontal long-axis, or vertical long-axis views, and
3% focal perfusion defect on polar maps was compared with normal
data banks.
Continuous data are presented as mean±SD. For
continuous variables, changes from before to after the procedure
were evaluated by paired Student's t test. A value of
P
0.05 was considered statistically significant. The
correlation coefficient was used to evaluate correlations between the
left ventricular mass reduction and LVOT reduction and also
the relation between the volume of ethanol injected and the peak CK
released. All measurements performed comparing preprocedure and
postprocedure studies were done in a blinded fashion.
![]()
Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Baseline Characteristics
The baseline characteristics of the enrolled patients (16 women
and 17 men) are reported below. The mean age was 52±15 years (range,
32 to 83 years). Three patients had class IV CHF symptoms, 25 patients
had class III symptoms, and 5 patients had class II symptoms.
Twenty-eight, 23, and 18 patients reported severe dyspnea, angina, and
presyncope/syncope, respectively. All patients were on
2 medications,
which included ß-blockers (29 patients), calcium
antagonists (24 patients), or antiarrhythmic drugs such as
sotalol, amiodarone, and disopyramide (10
patients). Seven patients had a permanent pacemaker placed before
enrollment in the study, and 1 patient had an implantable defibrillator
for inducible ventricular tachycardia.
All patients reported a significant improvement in symptoms before
hospital discharge. The mean duration of stay in the hospital was
3.6±1.7 days. At 6 weeks, 22 patients had NYHA class I symptoms, 5
patients had NYHA class II symptoms, and 6 patients were completely
asymptomatic. The mean NYHA class decreased from 3.0±0.5
to 0.9±0.6 (P<0.001) at 6 weeks. All patients reported
subjective improvement in exercise tolerance. Only 7 patients continued
to take medications on follow-up. At 6 months, 5 of 11 patients were
completely asymptomatic, and the rest had class I
symptoms.
Twenty-five patients had baseline left ventricular
hypertrophy, 9 patients had right bundle-branch block
(RBBB), 5 patients had left bundle-branch block (LBBB), and 4 patients
had left-axis deviation. Eleven patients (33%) developed complete
heart block, with junctional or ventricular escape rhythms
requiring permanent pacemaker implantation after the procedure. Six
(55%) of these had a baseline RBBB (n=3) or LBBB (n=3) in the initial
12-lead ECG. Two patients developed ST-segment elevation in leads
V1 and V2 in the setting of
acquired RBBB after alcohol injection that persisted for
24 hours.
Of the patients who did not require pacing, 8 had new RBBB, and 3
developed left anterior fascicular block.
The number of arteries injected with ethanol per patient was
1.7±0.4. The mean volume of ethanol injected per patient was 4.2±1.6
mL. The mean peak CK rise was modified 1964±796 U (range, 599 to 4230
U). The mean time to peak CK rise was 9.4±4.6 hours. The peak CK rise
correlated with the volume of ethanol injected (r=0.59,
P=0.04).
The resting LVOT gradient measured by Doppler
echocardiography was reduced (29 patients) or
abolished (4 patients) in all patients immediately after the procedure.
The resting gradient decreased from 49±33 to 12±12 mm Hg
(P<0.001) after the procedure (similar results were
obtained by catheter pullback immediately after the procedure) and
9±19 mm Hg (P<0.001) at 6 weeks. In 14 patients with
a minimal residual gradient immediately after the procedure, the
gradient was no longer present at 6 weeks. Six-month follow-up in
11 patients showed a resting residual gradient of only 3±11
mm Hg. No differences were noted in baseline or follow-up LVOT
gradients measured in patients who had a pacemaker in place before the
procedure, those who required permanent pacing for complete heart block
after the procedure, and those without pacemakers.
The left ventricular ejection fraction did not
decrease after septal reduction (Table
).
Basal septal thickness decreased by 28% (2.1±0.7 to 1.5±0.6 cm,
P<0.001) at 6 weeks, accompanied by a 17% reduction in
left ventricular mass (271±75 to 224±72 g,
P<0.001). As expected, the posterior wall thickness was
unchanged. Figure 4
shows a parasternal
long-axis view of the left ventricle showing the reduction in septal
thickness at 6 weeks. These findings correlated with an increase in
end-diastolic left ventricular diameter as
measured in the short axis (4.1±0.3 versus 4.5±0.5 cm,
P<0.01) and end-diastolic volumes (118±17
versus 129±23 mL, P<0.001), suggesting a
ventricular remodeling effect. The reduction in left
ventricular mass correlated with the reduction in LVOT
gradient (r=0.49, P<0.01). Six-month follow-up
showed persistence of these findings in 11 patients studied to
date.
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 1. Echocardiographic LV Parameters Before the Procedure and at
6 Weeks

View larger version (53K):
[in a new window]
Figure 4. Parasternal long-axis view of left ventricle
showing reduction of septal thickness after ethanol septal infarction.
Septal basal thickness decreased from 2.1 cm (left) to 1.2 cm at 6
weeks (right). PW indicates posterior wall; other abbreviations as in
Figure 3
.
At 6 weeks, 29 patients had a follow-up stress (exercise, n=23;
pharmacological, n=6) myocardial perfusion SPECT. All patients had a
fixed perfusion defect. These defects involved the upper or the upper
and middle septal area. Perfusion defects were characterized by the
unique appearance of "septal amputation," as a result of sharp
demarcation between normally and abnormally perfused
myocardium. The tracer reduction in the perfusion defect
was moderate to severe in 17 patients and mild in 12 patients. The
extent of the perfusion defect, measured by computerized polar plots,
involved 10±6% of the left ventricular mass (range, 3%
to 16%). Figure 5
demonstrates an
example of a new septal scar 6 weeks after the procedure.

View larger version (106K):
[in a new window]
Figure 5. Myocardial perfusion SPECT showing normal
perfusion at baseline (top panels in A, B, and C). A fixed defect
developed after procedure, localized to upper and middle septal areas,
as shown in short axis (A), horizontal long axis (B), and polar map (C)
during both exercise (middle) and rest (bottom).
All patients had transient chest pain with multiple premature
ventricular beats during alcohol injection. Only 3 patients
had persistent chest pain that required multiple injections of
analgesics. One patient had a 3-beat run of ventricular
tachycardia. Complete heart block occurred immediately with
alcohol injection and persisted for 3 days after the procedure in 11
patients, who then required implantation of permanent pacemakers. Eight
of these cases occurred in the first 17 patients before we modified our
technique, using contrast echocardiography to
delineate the hypertrophied area and also injecting ethanol at a slower
rate, as mentioned in the Methods section. Three patients had transient
heart block that resolved within 24 hours. Only 8 patients continue to
be pacemaker-dependent at 6 weeks. No patient died during the procedure
or to date.
![]()
Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
HOCM is a complex disease with diverse genetic, morphological,
functional, and clinical manifestations.14
Hypertrophy, the hallmark of this disease, usually develops
after puberty; although in most patients, hypertrophy is
initially restricted to the septum, it often progresses with age to
involve the whole ventricle. LVOT obstruction due to the enlarged
septum occurs in 20% to 30% of patients, and it stimulates more
hypertrophy, resulting in angina, dyspnea, syncope, and
sudden death.15 A considerable number of patients
continue to be symptomatic despite maximal drug
therapy,16 and ventricular septal
myotomy-myomyectomy is usually recommended for these
patients.17 Surgery reduces or eliminates the
obstruction in most individuals, and the effects are long-lasting.
Major complications of surgery include complete heart block,
ventricular septal defect, severe aortic insufficiency, and
death.18 The reported postoperative mortality as
a result of this operation varies from 1% in young patients to 17% in
patients >65 years old, especially in the presence of coronary
artery disease or other concomitant surgical
procedures.19 20 Recently, dual-chamber pacing
has been reported to result in a substantial decrease in the LVOT
gradient, with symptomatic improvement. However, randomized
studies suggest that a placebo effect may play an important role in the
short-term symptomatic improvement reported by
patients.6 7 21 The idea of inducing a septal
infarction by catheter techniques was suggested by the observations
that systolic and diastolic myocardial function of
selected areas of the left ventricle can be suppressed by balloon
occlusion of the supplying artery during coronary
angioplasty22 and that intracavitary pressure
gradients in HOCM decrease significantly when the first septal artery
is temporarily occluded by an angioplasty balloon
catheter.23
In summary, ethanol septal reduction is a minimally invasive
procedure that provides patients with immediate symptomatic
and hemodynamic relief. Follow-up data available on all
patients at the time of this writing show persistence of these results,
with septal thinning and increased diastolic dimensions.
There are no intermediate-term complications, such as septal wall
perforations, worsening ejection fraction, or ventricular
arrhythmias. However, it is not yet known whether this new
therapeutic modality will change the natural history of patients with
HOCM.
![]()
Acknowledgments
This study was supported in part by grants from the T.L.L.
Temple Foundation, Lufkin, Tex, and the Methodist Hospital, Houston,
Tex. We acknowledge Dr Ulrich Sigwart for his help and guidance in
starting this project at Baylor College of Medicine.
![]()
Footnotes
Reprint requests to William H. Spencer III, MD, 6550 Fannin, SM#1025, Houston, TX 77030.
![]()
References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
1.
Maron BJ, Gardin JM, Flack JM, Kurosaki TT, Bild
TE. Prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a
general population of young adults: echocardiographic
analysis of 4111 subjects in the CARDIA study.
Circulation. 1995;92:785789.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Keshishian, T. Addona, M. Burgess, D. R. Mani, X. Shi, E. Kuhn, M. S. Sabatine, R. E. Gerszten, and S. A. Carr Quantification of Cardiovascular Biomarkers in Patient Plasma by Targeted Mass Spectrometry and Stable Isotope Dilution Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2009; 8(10): 2339 - 2349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Alam, H. Dokainish, and N. M. Lakkis Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy-alcohol septal ablation vs. myectomy: a meta-analysis Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2009; 30(9): 1080 - 1087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. A. Cuoco, W. H. Spencer III, V. L. Fernandes, C. D. Nielsen, S. Nagueh, J. L. Sturdivant, R. B. Leman, J. M. Wharton, and M. R. Gold Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy for Primary Prevention of Sudden Death After Alcohol Septal Ablation of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 18, 2008; 52(21): 1718 - 1723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. L. Fernandes, C. Nielsen, S. F. Nagueh, A. E. Herrin, C. Slifka, J. Franklin, and W. H. Spencer III Follow-Up of Alcohol Septal Ablation for Symptomatic Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy: The Baylor and Medical University of South Carolina Experience 1996 to 2007 J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., October 1, 2008; 1(5): 561 - 570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S R Ommen, P M Shah, and A J Tajik Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: past, present and future Heart, October 1, 2008; 94(10): 1276 - 1281. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Fifer and G. J. Vlahakes Management of Symptoms in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Circulation, January 22, 2008; 117(3): 429 - 439. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Maron Surgical Myectomy Remains the Primary Treatment Option for Severely Symptomatic Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Circulation, July 10, 2007; 116(2): 196 - 206. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Fifer Most Fully Informed Patients Choose Septal Ablation Over Septal Myectomy Circulation, July 10, 2007; 116(2): 207 - 216. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. King III, T. Aversano, W. L. Ballard, R. H. Beekman III, M. J. Cowley, S. G. Ellis, D. P. Faxon, E. L. Hannan, J. W. Hirshfeld Jr, A. K. Jacobs, et al. ACCF/AHA/SCAI 2007 Update of the Clinical Competence Statement on Cardiac Interventional Procedures: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training (Writing Committee to Update the 1998 Clinical Competence Statement on Recommendations for the Assessment and Maintenance of Proficiency in Coronary Interventional Procedures) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 3, 2007; 50(1): 82 - 108. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Jassal, T. G. Neilan, M. A. Fifer, I. F. Palacios, P. A. Lowry, G. J. Vlahakes, M. H. Picard, and D. M. Yoerger Sustained improvement in left ventricular diastolic function after alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2006; 27(15): 1805 - 1810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Dokainish and N. Lakkis Alcohol relaxes the stiff heart Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2006; 27(15): 1769 - 1770. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Ibanez, J. Benezet-Mazuecos, F. Navarro, and J. Farre Takotsubo Syndrome: A Bayesian Approach to Interpreting Its Pathogenesis Mayo Clin. Proc., June 1, 2006; 81(6): 732 - 735. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. G. van Dockum, A. M. Beek, F. J. ten Cate, J. M. ten Berg, O. Bondarenko, M. J.W. Gotte, J. W.R. Twisk, M. B.M. Hofman, C. A. Visser, and A. C. van Rossum Early Onset and Progression of Left Ventricular Remodeling After Alcohol Septal Ablation in Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy Circulation, May 17, 2005; 111(19): 2503 - 2508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Woo, W. G. Williams, R. Choi, E. D. Wigle, E. Rozenblyum, K. Fedwick, S. Siu, A. Ralph-Edwards, and H. Rakowski Clinical and Echocardiographic Determinants of Long-Term Survival After Surgical Myectomy in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Circulation, April 26, 2005; 111(16): 2033 - 2041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Faber, H. Seggewiss, D. Welge, D. Fassbender, H. K. Schmidt, U. Gleichmann, and D. Horstkotte Echo-guided percutaneous septal ablation for symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: 7 years of experience Eur J Echocardiogr, October 1, 2004; 5(5): 347 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. O. Cheng, C. D. Kimmelstiel, and B. J. Maron In Percutaneous Transluminal Septal Myocardial Ablation for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy, It Is Not the Speed of Intracoronary Alcohol Injection But the Amount of Alcohol Injected That Determines the Resultant Infarct Size * Response Circulation, July 20, 2004; 110(3): e23 - e23. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F H Gietzen, C J Leuner, L Obergassel, C Strunk-Mueller, and H Kuhn Transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: feasibility, clinical benefit, and short term results in elderly patients Heart, June 1, 2004; 90(6): 638 - 644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Chang, N. M. Lakkis, J. Franklin, W. H. Spencer III, and S. F. Nagueh Predictors of Outcome After Alcohol Septal Ablation Therapy in Patients With Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy Circulation, February 24, 2004; 109(7): 824 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. G. van Dockum, F. J. ten Cate, J. M. ten Berg, A. M. Beek, J. W. R. Twisk, J. Vos, M. B. M. Hofman, C. A. Visser, and A. C. van Rossum Myocardial infarction after percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: evaluation by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 7, 2004; 43(1): 27 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Chang, S. F. Nagueh, W. H. Spencer III, and N. M. Lakkis Complete heart block: determinants and clinical impact in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy undergoing nonsurgical septal reduction therapy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 16, 2003; 42(2): 296 - 300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. V. Sherrid, F. A. Chaudhry, and D. G. Swistel Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: echocardiography, pathophysiology, and the continuing evolution of surgery for obstruction Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2003; 75(2): 620 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. H. Gietzen, C. J. Leuner, L. Obergassel, C. Strunk-Mueller, and H. Kuhn Role of Transcoronary Ablation of Septal Hypertrophy in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, New York Heart Association Functional Class III or IV, and Outflow Obstruction Only Under Provocable Conditions Circulation, July 23, 2002; 106(4): 454 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Maron Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review JAMA, March 13, 2002; 287(10): 1308 - 1320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Xin, T. Shiota, H. M. Lever, S. R. Kapadia, M. Sitges, D. N. Rubin, F. Bauer, N. L. Greenberg, D. A. Agler, J. K. Drinko, et al. Outcome of patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy after percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation and septal myectomy surgery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2001; 38(7): 1994 - 2000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. F. Nagueh, S. R. Ommen, N. M. Lakkis, D. Killip, W. A. Zoghbi, H. V. Schaff, G. K. Danielson, M. A. Quinones, A. J. Tajik, and W. H. Spencer III Comparison of ethanol septal reduction therapy with surgical myectomy for the treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2001; 38(6): 1701 - 1706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Boekstegers, P. Steinbigler, A. Molnar, M. Schwaiblmair, A. Becker, A. Knez, R. Haberl, and G. Steinbeck Pressure-guided nonsurgical myocardial reduction induced by small septal infarctions in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2001; 38(3): 846 - 853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. F. Nagueh, S. J. Stetson, N. M. Lakkis, D. Killip, A. Perez-Verdia, M. L. Entman, W. H. Spencer III, and G. Torre-Amione Decreased Expression of Tumor Necrosis Factor-{{alpha}} and Regression of Hypertrophy After Nonsurgical Septal Reduction Therapy for Patients With Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy Circulation, April 10, 2001; 103(14): 1844 - 1850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Mazur, S. F. Nagueh, N. M. Lakkis, K. J. Middleton, D. Killip, R. Roberts, and W. H. Spencer III Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy After Nonsurgical Septal Reduction Therapy for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy Circulation, March 20, 2001; 103(11): 1492 - 1496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.P. Dimitrow, D. Dudek, and J.S. Dubeil The risk of alcohol leakage into the left anterior descending coronary artery during non-surgical myocardial reduction in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2001; 22(5): 437 - 437. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Flores-Ramirez, N. M. Lakkis, K. J. Middleton, D. Killip, W. H. Spencer III, and S. F. Nagueh Echocardiographic insights into the mechanisms of relief of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction after nonsurgical septal reduction therapy in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2001; 37(1): 208 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Lakkis, S. F. Nagueh, J. K. Dunn, D. Killip, and W. H. Spencer III Nonsurgical septal reduction therapy for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: one-year follow-up J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2000; 36(3): 852 - 855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. H. Spencer III and R. Roberts Alcohol Septal Ablation in Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy : The Need for a Registry Circulation, August 8, 2000; 102(6): 600 - 601. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.H. Gietzen, CH.J. Leuner, J. Hegselmann, C. Strunk-Mueller, and H. Khun A reply Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2000; 21(7): 591 - 593. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J KNIGHT Five years of percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation Heart, March 1, 2000; 83(3): 255 - 256. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. Bhargava and R. Agarwal Can We Predict Complete Heart Block After Alcohol Ablation For Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy? Circulation, December 21, 1999; 100 (25): e144 - e144. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kuhn, F.H. Gietzen, M. Schafers, M. Freick, B. Gockel, C. Strunk-Muller, E. Jachmann, and O. Schober Changes in the left ventricular outflow tract after transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy (TASH) for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy as assessed by transoesophageal echocardiography and by measuring myocardial glucose utilization and perfusion Eur. Heart J., December 2, 1999; 20(24): 1808 - 1817. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Y. Henein, C. A. O'Sullivan, I. S. Ramzy, U. Sigwart, and D. G. Gibson Electromechanical left ventricular behavior after nonsurgical septal reduction in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1117 - 1122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. F. Nagueh, N. M. Lakkis, K. J. Middleton, D. Killip, W. A. Zoghbi, M. A. Quinones, and W. H. Spencer III Changes in left ventricular filling and left atrial function six months after nonsurgical septal reduction therapy for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1123 - 1128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. O. Cheng, W. H. Spencer III, N. M. Lakkis, S. F. Nagueh, N. S. Kleiman, D. Killip, Z.-X. He, M. S. Verani, and R. Roberts Transcatheter Alcohol Septal Ablation for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy • Response Circulation, September 14, 1999; 100 (11): 1250 - 1252. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B.J. Maron New interventions for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: promise and prudence Eur. Heart J., September 2, 1999; 20(18): 1292 - 1294. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Ommen, R. A. Nishimura, R. W. Squires, H. V. Schaff, G. K. Danielson, and A. J. Tajik Comparison of dual-chamber pacing versus septal myectomy for the treatment of patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: A comparison of objective hemodynamic and exercise end points J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 1999; 34(1): 191 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Fananapazir Advances in Molecular Genetics and Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy JAMA, May 12, 1999; 281(18): 1746 - 1752. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. F. Nagueh, N. M. Lakkis, K. J. Middleton, D. Killip, W. A. Zoghbi, M. A. Quinones, and W. H. Spencer Changes in Left Ventricular Diastolic Function 6 Months After Nonsurgical Septal Reduction Therapy for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy Circulation, January 26, 1999; 99(3): 344 - 347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. F. Nagueh, N. M. Lakkis, K. J. Middleton, W. H. Spencer III, W. A. Zoghbi, and M. A. Quinones Doppler Estimation of Left Ventricular Filling Pressures in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Circulation, January 19, 1999; 99(2): 254 - 261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Ethanol Septal Reduction for HOCM Journal Watch Cardiology, November 13, 1998; 1998(1113): 5 - 5. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Echo-Guided Ethanol Injections for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Journal Watch (General), November 3, 1998; 1998(1103): 6 - 6. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. P. Abraham, R. A. Nishimura, D. R. Holmes Jr, M. Belohlavek, and J. B. Seward Strain Rate Imaging for Assessment of Regional Myocardial Function: Results From a Clinical Model of Septal Ablation Circulation, March 26, 2002; 105(12): 1403 - 1406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |