From the Division of Cardiology, Kobe (Japan) General Hospital.
Correspondence to Takeshi Hozumi, MD, Division of Cardiology, Kobe General Hospital, 46 Minatojima-nakamachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650, Japan. E-mail jse{at}warp.or.jp
Methods and ResultsWe studied 36 patients who underwent
coronary angiography for the assessment of coronary
artery disease. The study population consisted of 12 patients with
significant LAD stenosis (group A) and 24 patients without
significant LAD stenosis (group B). With TTDE, coronary
flow velocities in the distal LAD were recorded at rest and during
hyperemia induced by intravenous infusion of
adenosine (0.14 mg · kg-1 ·
min-1) under the guidance of color Doppler flow
mapping. Adequate spectral Doppler recordings of
coronary flow in the distal LAD for the assessment of CFVR were
obtained in 34 of 36 study patients (94%). The peak and mean
diastolic coronary flow velocities at baseline did
not differ between groups A and B (23.6±10.3 versus 22.9±6.6 cm/s and
16.4±8.6 versus 14.5±4.0 cm/s, respectively). However, the peak and
mean coronary flow velocities during hyperemia in group
A were significantly smaller than those in group B (35.6±16.3 versus
54.2±16.3 cm/s and 24.7±13.1 versus 37.9±13.0 cm/s, respectively;
P<.01). There were significant differences in CFVR
obtained from peak and mean diastolic velocity between
groups A and B (1.5±0.2 versus 2.4±0.4 and 1.5±0.2 versus 2.6±0.4,
respectively; P<.001). A CFVR from peak
diastolic velocity <2.0 had a sensitivity of 92% and a
specificity of 82% for the presence of significant LAD
stenosis. A CFVR from mean diastolic velocity <2.0
had a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 86% for the presence of
significant LAD stenosis.
ConclusionsCFVR determined by TTDE is useful in the noninvasive
assessment of significant stenotic lesion in the LAD.
Several studies have reported that the epicardial coronary
blood flow velocity can be measured by TTDE, which is noninvasive and
widely used in the clinical setting.24 25 26 27 28 To the
best of our knowledge, however, no report has evaluated the usefulness
of CFVR measured by this noninvasive method. Recent technological
advancement in color Doppler echocardiography
may provide high success rate in measuring coronary flow
velocity and noninvasive CFVR assessment. The purpose of this study was
to evaluate the value of CFVR determined by TTDE for the assessment of
significant LAD stenosis.
Doppler Echocardiographic Studies
CFVR Measurements by TTDE
Each study was analyzed by one experienced investigator who was
unaware of the other patient data. Measurements were performed off-line
by tracing the contour of the spectral Doppler signal using the
computer incorporated in the ultrasound system. MDV and PDV were
measured at baseline and peak hyperemic conditions. An average
of the measurements was obtained in three cardiac cycles. CFVR was
defined as the ratio of hyperemic to basal peak
diastolic coronary flow velocity (CFVR PDV) and the
ratio of hyperemic to basal mean diastolic
coronary flow velocity (CFVR MDV). Normal CFVR was defined as
>2.0 on the basis of previous studies that evaluated flow velocities
in the distal LAD.16 19
Two-dimensional Echocardiographic Measurements of
LV Function at Baseline
Coronary Angiography
Data Analysis
Interobserver and intraobserver variabilities were assessed for
velocity measurements in 15 recordings in seven randomly
selected patients. Interobserver variability was calculated as the SD
of the differences between the measurements of two independent
observers who were unaware of the other patient data and expressed as a
percent of the average value. Intraobserver variability was calculated
as the SD of the differences between the first and second determination
(3-week interval) for a single observer and expressed as a percent of
the average value.
LV Function at Baseline
Hemodynamics
CFVR Measurement by TTDE
Observer Variabilities
CFVR Measurements by Conventional Methods
TTDE is noninvasive, relatively inexpensive, and widely used in
the clinical setting and can be used for serial studies in
echocardiographic laboratories.
Fusejima24 reported that it was possible to
measure coronary flow velocity in the midportion of the LAD
with two-dimensional Doppler echocardiography.
However, the measurement of coronary flow velocity was possible
in 35% of the normal subjects and 50% of the patients with
cardiovascular disease because it was performed without
the guidance of color Doppler flow mapping. Ross et
al25 reported that coronary flow velocity
in the distal LAD was measured in 33% of the study patients, although
the distal LAD was visualized with high-frequency (7.5 MHz),
two-dimensional ultrasound in 85% of the study patients. In their
study, color Doppler flow mapping was not used to detect
coronary flow signal in the LAD. The success rate in the
measurement of coronary flow velocity in the middle to distal
LAD by the conventional transthoracic approach without the
guidance of color Doppler flow mapping is not sufficient for the
assessment of CFVR. Thus, there has been no report to date of
evaluating CFVR by the transthoracic approach.
CFVR Measurements by TTDE
Study Limitations
Second, we measured CFVR from only diastolic mean
velocities, not mean velocities throughout the entire cardiac cycle. It
was difficult to obtain complete Doppler spectral envelopes
throughout the entire cardiac cycle because of cyclic cardiac motion in
6 of the 36 patients (17%). However, diastolic component
of the spectral Doppler signal of the LAD flow could be clearly
obtained by positioning the sample volume in the LAD during the
diastolic phase under the guidance of color Doppler
flow mapping in 34 of the 36 patients. In the previous studies using
transesophageal Doppler
echocardiography, the ratio of hyperemic to
basal MDV and PDV was useful in the evaluation of functional
coronary stenosis.18 19 20
Third, in the present study, there was only a small number of
patients with significant coronary stenosis in the LAD.
In future investigations, more patients should be studied by the
present method.
In the present study, we excluded several factors influencing CFVR
measurement such as LV hypertrophy and myocardial
infarction. However, other potential determinants of CFVR that were not
measured and were not excluded in this study may affect the sensitivity
and specificity for the presence of significant LAD stenosis in
the present method.
Finally, in the present study, only CFVR in the LAD was assessed by
TTDE. Further investigation is necessary so that CFVR of the other
coronary vessels can be assessed by this noninvasive
method.
Conclusions
Received October 16, 1997;
revision received December 9, 1997;
accepted December 19, 1997.
2.
Gould KL, Lipscomb K. Effects of coronary
stenoses on coronary flow reserve and resistance.
Am J Cardiol. 1974;34:4855.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Marcus ML, Wright C, Doty D, Eastham C, Laughlin
D, Krumm P, Fastenow C, Brody M. Measurements of coronary
velocity and reactive hyperemia in the coronary
circulation of humans. Circ Res. 1981;49:877890.
4.
Hoffman JIE. Maximal coronary flow and the
concept of coronary vascular reserve. Circulation. 1984;70:153159.
5.
Marcus ML, Wilson RF, White CW. Methods of
measurement of myocardial blood flow in patients: a critical review.
Circulation. 1987;76:245253.
6.
Klocke FJ. Measurements of coronary flow
reserve: defining pathology versus making decisions about patient care.
Circulation. 1987;76:11831189.
7.
Wilson RF, Laughlin DE, Ackell PH, Chilian WA, Holida
MD, Hartely CJ, Armstrong ML, Marcus ML, White CW. Transluminal
subselective measurement of coronary artery blood flow velocity
and vasodilator reserve in man. Circulation. 1985;72:8292.
8.
Wilson RF, White CW. Intracoronary papaverine:
an ideal coronary vasodilator for studies of the
coronary circulation in conscious humans.
Circulation. 1985;73:444451.
9.
Wilson RF, Marcus ML, White CW. Prediction of
the physiologic significance of coronary arterial
lesions by quantitative lesion geometry in patients with limited
coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1987;75:723732.
10.
Wilson R, Wyche K, Christiansen B. Effects of
adenosine on human coronary circulation.
Circulation. 1990;82:15951606.
11.
Rossen JD, Quillen JE, Lopez AG, Stenberg RG, Talman
CL, Winniford MD. Comparison of coronary vasodilation with
intravenous dipyridamole and
adenosine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:485491.[Abstract]
12.
Kern MJ, Deligonul U, Tatineni S, Serota H,
Aguirre F, Hilton TC. Intravenous adenosine:
continuous infusion and low dose bolus administration for determination
of coronary vasodilator reserve in patients with and without
coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:718729.[Abstract]
13.
Segal J, Kern MJ, Scott NA, King SB III, Doucette
JW, Heuser RR, Ofili E, Siegel R. Alterations or phasic
coronary artery flow velocity in humans during
percutaneous coronary angioplasty. J
Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:276286.[Abstract]
14.
Doucette JW, Corl D, Payne GM, Flynn AE, Goto M, Nassi
M, Segal J. Validation of a Doppler guide wire for intravascular
measurement of coronary artery flow velocity.
Circulation. 1992;85:18991911.
15.
Ofili EO, Kern MJ, Lavovitz AJ, St Vrain JA, Segal J,
Aguirre FV, Castello R. Analysis of coronary blood flow
velocity dynamics in angiographically normal and stenosed arteries
before and after endolumen enlargement by angioplasty. J Am
Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:308316.[Abstract]
16.
Miller DD, Donohue TJ, Younis LT, Bach RG, Aguirre FV,
Wittry MD, Goodgold HM, Chaittman BR, Kern MJ. Correlation of
pharmacological 99mTc-Sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging with
poststenotic coronary flow reserve in patients with
angiographically intermediate coronary artery stenoses.
Circulation. 1994;89:21502160.
17.
Joye JD, Schulman DS, Lasorda D, Farah T, Donohue BC,
Reichek N. Intracoronary Doppler guide wire versus stress
single-photon emission computed tomographic thallium-201 imaging in
assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:940947.[Abstract]
18.
Akasaka T, Yoshikawa J, Yoshida K, Maeda K,
Hozumi T, Nasu M, Shomura T. Flow capacity of internal mammary artery
grafts: early restriction and later improvement assessed by Doppler
guide wire: comparison with saphenous vein grafts. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 1995;25:640647.[Abstract]
19.
Voudris V, Manginas A, Vassilikos V, Koutelou M,
Kantzis J, Cokkinos DV. Coronary flow velocity changes after
intravenous dipyridamole infusion:
measurements using intravascular Doppler guide wire: a
documentation of flow inhomogeneity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:11481155.[Abstract]
20.
Clayes MJ, Vrints CJ, Bosmans J, Krug B, Blockx PP,
Snoeck JP. Coronary flow reserve during coronary
angioplasty in patients with a recent myocardial infarction: relation
to stenosis and myocardial viability. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 1996;28:17121719.[Abstract]
21.
Iliceto S, Marangelli V, Memmola C, Rizzon P.
Transesophageal Doppler
echocardiography evaluation of coronary
blood flow in baseline conditions and during
dipyridamole-induced coronary vasodilation.
Circulation. 1991;83:6169.
22.
Redberg RF, Sobol Y, Chou TM, Malloy M, Kumar S,
Botvinick E, Kane J. Adenosine-induced coronary
vasodilatation during transesophageal Doppler
echocardiography: rapid and safe measurement of
coronary flow reserve ration can predict significant left
anterior descending coronary stenosis.
Circulation. 1995;92:190196.
23.
Stoddard MF, Prince CR, Moriis GT. Coronary
flow reserve assessment by dobutamine
transesophageal Doppler
echocardiography. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 1995;25:325332.[Abstract]
24.
Fusejima K. Noninvasive measurement of coronary
artery blood flow using combined two-dimensional and Doppler
echocardiography. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 1987;10:10241031.[Abstract]
25.
Ross JJ Jr, Mintz RG, Chandrasekaran K.
Transthoracic two-dimensional high frequency (7.5 MHz)
ultrasonic visualization of the distal left anterior coronary
artery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:373377.[Abstract]
26.
Kenny A, Shapiro LM. Transthoracic
high-frequency two-dimensional echocardiography,
Doppler and color flow mapping to determine anatomy and
blood flow patterns in the distal left anterior descending
coronary artery. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:12651268.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Kenny A, Wisbey CR, Shapiro LM. Measurement of left
anterior descending coronary artery flow velocities by
transthoracic Doppler ultrasound. Am J
Cardiol. 1994;73:1202112022.
28.
Kenny A, Wisbey CR, Shapiro LM. Profiles of
coronary blood flow velocity in patients with aortic
stenosis and the effect of valve replacement: a
transthoracic echocardiographic study.
Br Heart J. 1994;71:5762.
29.
Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, DeMaria A,
Devereux R, Feigenbaum H, Gutgesell H, Reichek N, Sahn D, Schnittger I,
Silverman NH, Tajik AJ. Recommendations for quantitation of the left
ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989;2:358367.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Hasse J, van der Linden MM, Di Mario C, van der Giessen
WJ, Foley DP, Serruys PW. Can the same edge-detection algorithm be
applied to on-line analysis systems? Am Heart
J. 1993;126:312321.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Lesperance J, Waters D. Measuring progression and
regression of coronary atherosclerosis in
clinical trials: problems and progress. Int J Card
Imaging. 1992;8:165173.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Koning G, van der Zwet PM, von Land CD, Reiber JH.
Angiographic assessment of dimensions of 6F and 7F Mallinckrodt
Softouch coronary contrast catheters from digital and cine
arteriograms. Int J Card Imaging. 1992;8:153161.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Gould K, Goldstein R, Mullani N. Noninvasive
assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial perfusion
imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilation, VII:
clinical feasibility of positron cardiac imaging without a cyclotron
using generator-produced rubidium-82. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 1986;7:775789.[Abstract]
34.
Isada L, Marwick TH, MacIntyre WJ. Physiologic
evaluation of coronary flow: the role of positron emission
tomography. Cleve Clin J Med. 1993;60:1924.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Uren NG, Melin JA, Bruyne BD, Wijns W, Baudhuin T,
Camici PG. Relation between myocardial blood flow and the severity of
coronary artery stenosis. N Engl J
Med. 1994;330:17821788.
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports
Noninvasive Assessment of Significant Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Stenosis by Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve With Transthoracic Color Doppler Echocardiography
![]()
Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
BackgroundCoronary
flow reserve has been considered an important diagnostic
index of the functional significance of coronary artery
stenosis. With Doppler technique, it has been assessed as
the ratio of hyperemic to basal coronary flow velocity
(coronary flow velocity reserve [CFVR]) by invasive or
semiinvasive methods with a Doppler catheter, a Doppler guide
wire, and a transesophageal Doppler
echocardiographic probe. Recent technological
advancement in transthoracic Doppler
echocardiography (TTDE) provides measurement of
coronary flow velocity in the distal portion of the left
anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and may be useful in
the noninvasive CFVR measurement. The purpose of this study was to
evaluate the value of CFVR determined by TTDE for the assessment of
significant LAD stenosis.
Key Words: blood flow coronary disease echocardiography
![]()
Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Coronary flow
reserve estimated by drug-induced coronary vasodilation has
been considered an important diagnostic index of functional
significant coronary artery
stenosis.1 2 3 4 5 6 With Doppler technique,
it has been alternatively assessed as the ratio of hyperemic to
basal coronary flow velocity (CFVR) after drug-induced
coronary vasodilation by invasive techniques with a Doppler
catheter7 8 9 10 11 12 or a Doppler guide
wire.13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Although these methods have already
been established as useful techniques, they are available only during
cardiac catheterization and limit the clinical
application of CFVR in the assessment of coronary artery
disease. Recent several reports have shown that CFVR measured by
transesophageal Doppler
echocardiography is useful in the assessment of
significant LAD stenosis.21 22 23 However,
the transesophageal approach is not noninvasive but
semiinvasive.
![]()
Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Study Patients
We prospectively examined 36 consecutive patients (27 men, 9
women; mean age, 59±15 years) who underwent coronary
angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease.
Patients with unstable angina, decompensative congestive heart failure,
atrial fibrillation, previous coronary bypass graft surgery,
diabetes mellitus, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease, or bronchospasm were not enrolled. None had a clinical history
or ECG signs of a previous myocardial infarction, history of systemic
hypertension, or evidence of primary myocardial or valvular
heart disease. No patient had evidence of LV hypertrophy
(septal or posterior wall thickness at diastole >12
mm) on echocardiographic examination. Reason for
coronary angiography was evaluation for coronary artery
disease. Of the 36 patients, 12 had a significant stenotic
lesion in the proximal or middle portion of the LAD (group A; diameter
stenosis >70%; 9 men, 3 women; mean age, 69±6 years); the
remainder did not have a significant stenotic lesion in the LAD
(group B; 18 men, 6 women; mean age, 54±15 years). In all the study
patients, there was no significant stenosis (diameter
stenosis >70%) in the other coronary arteries besides
the LAD. All participants gave informed consent to the protocol
approved by the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects in
Research at Kobe General Hospital.
Echocardiographic examinations were performed
with an ATL HDI-3000CV digital ultrasound system with a frequency of 4
to 7 MHz (Doppler frequency, 4 MHz; (Advanced Technology
Laboratory), and a Toshiba SSA-380A digital ultrasound system with a
frequency of 7.5 MHz (Doppler frequency; 5 MHz). In color
Doppler flow mapping, velocity range was set at ±24.0 or ±19.2
cm/s in ATL system and ±17.4 or ±16.1 cm/s in the Toshiba system. The
color gain was adjusted to provide optimal images. The acoustic window
was around the midclavicular line in the fourth and fifth intercostal
spaces in the left lateral decubitus position. The ultrasound beam was
transmitted toward the heart to visualize coronary blood flow
in the LAD by color Doppler echocardiography
(Fig 1
). First, the left ventricle was
imaged in the long-axis cross section, and then the ultrasound beam was
inclined laterally. Next, coronary blood flow in the distal
portion of the LAD was searched under the guidance of color Doppler
flow mapping (Fig 2
). With a sample
volume (1.5 or 2.0 mm wide) positioned on the color signal in the
LAD, Doppler spectral tracings of flow velocity in the LAD were
recorded by fast Fourier transformation analysis (Fig
3). The spectral Doppler
of the LAD flow showed a characteristic biphasic flow pattern with a
larger diastolic component and a small systolic
one. All studies were continuously recorded on 1/2 inch super-VHS
videotape for off-line analysis.

View larger version (140K):
[in a new window]
Figure 1. Coronary angiogram demonstrating the
relative relation of the transthoracic probe to the
LAD.

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Figure 2. Transthoracic color Doppler
echocardiogram (left) and schematic representation (right)
showing coronary blood flow (red signal) in the distal
LAD.

View larger version (113K):
[in a new window]
Figure 3. Pulsed Doppler placement of sample volume in
the distal LAD (right) to measure coronary flow velocity in the
LAD (left).
We first recorded baseline spectral Doppler signals in
the distal portion of the LAD. Adenosine was administered (140
µg · kg-1 ·
min-1 IV) for 2 minutes to record spectral
Doppler signals during hyperemic conditions. All patients
had continuous heart rate and ECG monitoring. Blood pressure was
recorded at baseline, every minute during adenosine
infusion, and at recovery.
Before CFVR measurements by TTDE, we measured LV wall (septal
and posterior wall thickness) at end diastole by
two-dimensional echocardiography. LV volume
measurements were performed according to the recommendation of the
American Society of
Echocardiography.29 Apical
two- and four-chamber views were obtained at baseline.
End-diastolic and end-systolic LV volumes were
computed by use of modified Simpson's method (method of disks). When
only one apical view was of adequate quality for assessment, modified
Simpson's method was used in either the four- or two-chamber view to
calculate LV volumes. Ejection fraction was calculated as follows:
(end-diastolic LV volume)-(end-systolic LV
volume)/(end-diastolic LV volume)x100. Furthermore, we
assessed regional wall motion at rest on the basis of 16 segments of
the LV as recommended by the American Society of
Echocardiography.29
Coronary angiography was performed by the Judkins
technique after injection of 4000 IU IV heparin. Coronary
stenosis was evaluated by use of multiple projections by an
experienced investigator unaware of the
echocardiographic data. Quantitative analysis
was done with a MEDIS (Medical Imaging Systems CMS analysis
software).30 31 32 A stenosis was
considered significant if there was >70% lumen diameter narrowing in
at least one projection.
Mean and SD are expressed for the parametric data. The
differences between the two groups for the parametric data were
tested by use of an unpaired two-tailed t test. Differences
between baseline and hyperemic data within the two groups were
tested by use of a paired two-tailed Student's t test.
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative
predictive value for CFVR as a predictor of significant LAD
stenosis were calculated in the traditional manner.
![]()
Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Under the guidance of color Doppler flow mapping, adequate
spectral Doppler recordings of coronary flow in the
distal portion of the LAD for the assessment of CFVR were obtained 34
of 36 study patients (94%). No patient noted AV block, chest pain,
flushing, or palpitations during the vasodilator infusion in the TTDE
studies.
For the measurement of LV wall thickness (septal and posterior
wall), there were no significant differences between groups A and B
(9.7±1.2 versus 9.8±1.4 mm and 10.0±1.0 versus 9.9±1.1
mm, respectively). Both end-diastolic and
end-systolic LV volumes did not differ between groups A and B
(93.4±10.9 versus 97.2±6.6 mL and 36.9±10.2 versus 40.3±6.0 mL,
respectively) at baseline. There was no significant difference in
ejection fraction measurement between groups A and B (60.9±6.9%
versus 58.7±4.7%). In each case in both groups, segmental wall motion
abnormality was not found by two-dimensional
echocardiography at baseline.
During drug administration, heart rate increased from 68±10 to
78±12 bpm (P<.001) in the study patients. Systolic
arterial pressure decreased from 120±12 to 110±10
mm Hg (P<.05), and diastolic
arterial pressure decreased from 72±10 to 60±6
mm Hg (P<.001). An increase in coronary flow
velocity was obtained within 50 seconds of the start of the vasodilator
infusion. Flow velocity remained stable throughout the infusion period
and returned to baseline within 30 seconds of discontinuation of the
drug.
PDV and MDV at baseline did not differ between groups A and B
(23.6±10.3 versus 22.9±6.6 cm/s and 16.4±8.6 versus 14.5±4.0 cm/s,
respectively; see the Table
). However, PDV and MDV
during hyperemia in group A were significantly smaller than
those in group B (35.6±16.3 versus 54.2±16.3 cm/s and 24.7±13.1
versus 37.9±13.0 cm/s, respectively; P<.01; the Table
).
There were significant differences in CFVR PDV and CFVR MDV measured in
groups A and B (1.5±0.2 versus 2.4±0.4 and 1.5±0.2 versus 2.6±0.4,
respectively; P<.001; the Table
and Figs 4
and 5
). A
CFVR (PDV) < 2.0 had a sensitivity of 92%, a specificity of 82%,
positive predictive value of 73%, and a negative predictive value of
95% for the presence of significant LAD stenosis (Fig 6
). A CFVR MDV <2.0 had a sensitivity of
92%, a specificity of 86%, positive predictive value of 79%, and a
negative predictive value of 95% for the presence of significant LAD
stenosis (Fig 7
).
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 1. CFVR in Patients With and Without Significant LAD
Stenosis

View larger version (57K):
[in a new window]
Figure 4. Spectral Doppler flows at rest (left) and
during hyperemia (right) in a patient without significant LAD
stenosis.

View larger version (56K):
[in a new window]
Figure 5. Spectral Doppler flows at rest (left) and
during hyperemia (right) in a patient with significant LAD
stenosis.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Figure 6. Relation between CFVR obtained from CFVR PDV and
percent diameter stenosis of the LAD. A peak CFVR <2.0
predicts significant LAD stenosis (>70% diameter
stenosis) with a sensitivity and specificity of 92% and 82%,
respectively.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Figure 7. Relation between mean CFVR obtained from
CFVR MDV and percent diameter stenosis of the LAD. A mean CFVR
<2.0 predicts significant LAD stenosis (>70% diameter
stenosis) with a sensitivity and specificity of 92% and 86%,
respectively.
Interobserver and intraobserver variabilities for the measurements
of Doppler velocity recordings were 4.8% and 4.0%,
respectively.
![]()
Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
In the present study, we evaluated the value of CFVR
determined by TTDE for the assessment of significant LAD
stenosis after drug-induced coronary vasodilation. TTDE
was shown to be a feasible method for the noninvasive measurement of
CFVR and detection of significant LAD stenosis.
It has been reported that assessment of coronary
flow reserve by administration of coronary vasodilators
provides an important diagnostic index of the functional
significant coronary artery
stenosis.1 2 3 4 5 6 With Doppler technique,
coronary flow reserve has been alternatively assessed as the
ratio of hyperemic to basal coronary flow velocity
after drug-induced coronary vasodilation by invasive techniques
with a Doppler catheter7 8 9 10 11 12 or a Doppler
guide wire13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 because changes in
coronary flow velocities induced by coronary
vasodilation closely reflect changes in coronary blood
flow.7 Although these invasive methods have
already been established as useful techniques, they are available only
in the catheterization laboratories and limit the
clinical application of CFVR in the assessment of coronary
artery disease. Positron emission tomography has been used to measure
coronary flow reserve
noninvasively.33 34 35 However, this method is
expensive and not generally available. Several studies have reported
that transesophageal Doppler
echocardiography is useful in the assessment of
significant LAD stenosis by measuring hyperemic to
basal coronary flow velocity in the proximal
LAD.21 22 23 However, strictly speaking, the
transesophageal approach is not noninvasive, but
semi-invasive.
In the present study, the success rate of the
measurement of coronary flow velocity in the distal LAD for the
assessment of CFVR was much higher (94%) compared with the previous
reports using conventional TTDE. The high success rate in this study
was due to the following reasons: reduction of the velocity range in
color Doppler flow mapping and modified method to position the
sample volume in the distal LAD under the guidance of color Doppler
flow mapping. First, the reduction in the velocity range enhanced the
visualization of the low-velocity signal in the distal LAD by lowering
the cutoff limit of the wall motion filter. The velocity range in
conventional color Doppler flow mapping is usually set in the range
of
60 to 70 cm/s in routine echocardiographic
examinations. It is possible that use of conventional ultrasound
systems that incorporate color Doppler flow mapping set only in the
high velocity range leads to difficulty in visualization of the
low-velocity signals usually seen in the LAD flow. In our present
study, we lowered the setting of the velocity range in color
Doppler flow mapping. Application of this newly modified velocity
range in color Doppler flow mapping provided improved visualization
of coronary flow signal in the distal LAD. Second, our method
combined color Doppler flow mapping and the conventional pulsed
Doppler technique. This modification facilitated the positioning of
the sample volume in the distal LAD flow. Our study demonstrated that
color Doppler flow mapping enables a more efficient guidance of the
sample volume in the distal LAD compared with previous studies that
used only two-dimensional imaging. Although the previous studies
reported that successful detection of the middle to distal LAD flow was
33% to 50%,24 25 26 we were able to significantly
improve the success rate to 94%. With the
transesophageal approach, the success rate of the
detection of coronary flow velocity in the proximal LAD has
been reported to be from 69% to 89%.21 22 23 The
success rate with the present transthoracic approach is
higher than with the transesophageal studies.
Furthermore, the transthoracic approach is completely
noninvasive. The higher success rate in the assessment of CFVR and the
fact that it is a noninvasive procedure should be important advantages
in the present transthoracic method.
We measured changes in coronary flow velocity, not
changes in coronary blood flow. However, it has been reported
that changes in coronary flow velocities induced by
coronary vasodilation closely reflect changes in
coronary blood flow.7 Previous studies
with Doppler catheter, Doppler guide wire, and
transesophageal Doppler
echocardiography have shown that these techniques
are useful in the prediction of significant coronary artery
stenosis by the assessment of changes in coronary flow
velocity.15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
CFVR determined by TTDE is useful in the noninvasive assessment of
significant LAD stenosis.
![]()
Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
CFVR
=
coronary flow velocity reserve
LAD
=
left anterior descending coronary artery
LV
=
left ventricle/left ventricular
MDV
=
mean diastolic velocity
PDV
=
peak diastolic velocity
TTDE
=
transthoracic Doppler
echocardiography
![]()
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance of Toshikazu
Yagi, the sonographer, in the present study, and the assistance of
Phillip C. Yang, MD, in the preparation of the manuscript.
![]()
References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
1.
Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton GW. Physiologic
basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis:
instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during
coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow
reserve. Am J Cardiol. 1974;33:8794.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Turiel, F. Atzeni, L. Tomasoni, S. de Portu, L. Delfino, B. D. Bodini, M. Longhi, S. Sitia, M. Bianchi, P. Ferrario, et al. Non-invasive assessment of coronary flow reserve and ADMA levels: a case-control study of early rheumatoid arthritis patients Rheumatology, July 1, 2009; 48(7): 834 - 839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Garcia, P. G. Camici, L.-G. Durand, K. Rajappan, E. Gaillard, O. E. Rimoldi, and P. Pibarot Impairment of coronary flow reserve in aortic stenosis J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2009; 106(1): 113 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Niizuma, S. Takiuchi, S. Okada, T. Horio, K. Kamide, H. Nakata, F. Yoshihara, S. Nakamura, Y. Kawano, H. Nakahama, et al. Decreased coronary flow reserve in haemodialysis patients Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 2324 - 2328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Turkmen, H. Oflaz, B. Uslu, A. O. Cimen, A. Elitok, E. Kasikcioglu, S. Alisir, F. Tufan, S. Namli, M. Uysal, et al. Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve and Carotid Intima Media Thickness in Patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: From Impaired Tubules to Impaired Carotid and Coronary Arteries Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2008; 3(4): 986 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Meimoun and C. Tribouilloy Non-invasive assessment of coronary flow and coronary flow reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: a magic tool for the real world Eur J Echocardiogr, July 1, 2008; 9(4): 449 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Stangl, V. Witzel, G. Baumann, and K. Stangl Current diagnostic concepts to detect coronary artery disease in women Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2008; 29(6): 707 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H Oe, T Hozumi, E Murata, H Matsuura, K Negishi, Y Matsumura, S Iwata, K Ogawa, K Sugioka, Y Takemoto, et al. Arachidonic acid and docosahexaenoic acid supplementation increases coronary flow velocity reserve in Japanese elderly individuals Heart, March 1, 2008; 94(3): 316 - 321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H. Aburawi, A. Berg, P. Liuba, and E. Pesonen Effects of cardiopulmonary bypass surgery on coronary flow in children assessed with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): H1138 - H1143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. Camici and F. Crea Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction N. Engl. J. Med., February 22, 2007; 356(8): 830 - 840. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Hozumi, K Sugioka, K Shimada, S H Kim, M Y Kuo, Y Miyake, K Fujimoto, R Otsuka, H Watanabe, K Hosoda, et al. Beneficial effect of short term intake of red wine polyphenols on coronary microcirculation in patients with coronary artery disease. Heart, May 1, 2006; 92(5): 681 - 682. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gronros, J. Wikstrom, U. Hagg, B. Wandt, and L.-m. Gan Proximal to Middle Left Coronary Artery Flow Velocity Ratio, As Assessed Using Color Doppler Echocardiography, Predicts Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis in Mice Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, May 1, 2006; 26(5): 1126 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A.L. Ahmari, K. Modesto, J. Bunch, V. Stussy, A. Dichak, J. Seward, P. Pellikka, and K. Chandrasekaran Doppler derived coronary flow reserve during dobutamine stress echocardiography further improves detection of myocardial ischemia Eur J Echocardiogr, March 1, 2006; 7(2): 134 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H Yoshitani, M Takeuchi, K Sakamoto, T Akasaka, K Yoshida, and J Yoshikawa Effect of one or more co-morbid conditions on diagnostic accuracy of coronary flow velocity reserve for detecting significant left anterior descending coronary stenosis Heart, October 1, 2005; 91(10): 1294 - 1298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Hagg, B. Wandt, G. Bergstrom, R. Volkmann, and L.-m. Gan Physical exercise capacity is associated with coronary and peripheral vascular function in healthy young adults Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2005; 289(4): H1627 - H1634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wikstrom, J. Gronros, G. Bergstrom, and L.-m. Gan Functional and Morphologic Imaging of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Living Mice Using High-Resolution Color Doppler Echocardiography and Ultrasound Biomicroscopy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 16, 2005; 46(4): 720 - 727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Florenciano-Sanchez, G. de la Morena-Valenzuela, M. Villegas-Garcia, F. Soria-Arcos, R. Rubio-Paton, F. Teruel-Carrillo, J. Hurtado, and M. Valdes-Chavarri Noninvasive assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve in left anterior descending artery adds diagnostic value to both clinical variables and dobutamine echocardiography: a study based on clinical practice Eur J Echocardiogr, August 1, 2005; 6(4): 251 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Pizzuto, P. Voci, E. Mariano, P. E. Puddu, A. Aprile, and F. Romeo Evaluation of flow in the left anterior descending coronary artery but not in the left internal mammary artery graft predicts significant stenosis of the arterial conduit J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 2005; 45(3): 424 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Voci, F. Pizzuto, and F. Romeo Coronary flow: a new asset for the echo lab? Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2004; 25(21): 1867 - 1879. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Iwakura, H. Ito, S. Kawano, A. Okamura, K. Tanaka, Y. Nishida, Y. Maekawa, and K. Fujii Assessing myocardial perfusion with the transthoracic Doppler technique in patients with reperfused anterior myocardial infarction: comparison with angiographic, enzymatic and electrocardiographic indices Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2004; 25(17): 1526 - 1533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Coppola, C. Astarita, M. Oliviero, D. Fontana, G. Picardi, K. Esposito, R. Marfella, L. Coppola, and D. Giugliano Impairment of Coronary Circulation by Acute Hyperhomocysteinemia in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Diabetes Care, August 1, 2004; 27(8): 2055 - 2056. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. O. Kiviniemi, M. Saraste, J. W. Koskenvuo, K. E. J. Airaksinen, J. O. Toikka, A. Saraste, J. P. Parkka, and J. J. Hartiala Coronary artery diameter can be assessed reliably with transthoracic echocardiography Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2004; 286(4): H1515 - H1520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Takeuchi, Y. Nohtomi, H. Yoshitani, C. Miyazaki, K. Sakamoto, and J. Yoshikawa Enhanced coronary flow velocity during intra-aortic balloon pumping assessed by transthoracic doppler echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 4, 2004; 43(3): 368 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Lethen and H. Lambertz Doppler echocardiographic assessment of coronary artery disease: a challenge becomes reality Eur J Echocardiogr, January 1, 2004; 5(1): 5 - 7. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Krzanowski, W. Bodzon, D. Dudek, G. Heba, M. Rzeszutko, R. Nizankowski, J. Dubiel, and A. Szczeklik Transthoracic, harmonic mode, contrast enhanced color Doppler echocardiography in detection of restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions. Prospective evaluation verified by coronary angiography Eur J Echocardiogr, January 1, 2004; 5(1): 51 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lee, Y. Otsuji, S. Minagoe, S. Hamasaki, K. Toyonaga, M. Negishi, M. Tsurugida, H. Toda, and C. Tei Noninvasive Evaluation of Coronary Reperfusion by Transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography in Patients With Anterior Acute Myocardial Infarction Before Coronary Intervention Circulation, December 2, 2003; 108(22): 2763 - 2768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yoshitatsu, Y. Miyamoto, M. Mitsuno, K. Toda, M. Yoshikawa, S. Fukui, F. Nomura, N. Hirata, and K. Onishi Changes in left anterior descending coronary artery flow profiles after coronary artery bypass grafting examined by means of transthoracic Doppler echocardiography J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2003; 126(5): 1531 - 1536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hirata, N. Asaoka, A. Amemiya, S. Hatsuoka, T. Ueno, and Y. Kosakai Noninvasive evaluation of internal thoracic artery and left anterior descending coronary artery anastomotic sites using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: comparison with coronary arteriography J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2003; 126(4): 1080 - 1086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Hozumi, Y Kanzaki, Y Ueda, A Yamamuro, T Takagi, T Akasaka, S Homma, K Yoshida, and J Yoshikawa Coronary flow velocity analysis during short term follow up after coronary reperfusion: use of transthoracic Doppler echocardiography to predict regional wall motion recovery in patients with acute myocardial infarction Heart, October 1, 2003; 89(10): 1163 - 1168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ruscazio, R. Montisci, and S. Iliceto Expanding the noninvasive coronary physiology assessment with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography Eur J Echocardiogr, September 1, 2003; 4(3): 159 - 161. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Auriti, C Cianfrocca, C Pristipino, S Greco, M Galeazzi, V Guido, and M Santini Improving feasibility of posterior descending coronary artery flow recording by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography Eur J Echocardiogr, September 1, 2003; 4(3): 214 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Garot, O Pascal, M Simon, J L Monin, E Teiger, J Garot, P Gueret, and J L Dubois-Rande Impact of microvascular integrity and local viability on left ventricular remodelling after reperfused acute myocardial infarction Heart, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 393 - 397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hiraishi, H. Hirota, Y. Horiguchi, N. Takeda, N. Fujino, N. Ogawa, and Y. Nakahata Transthoracic Doppler assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve in children with Kawasaki disease: Comparison with coronary angiography and thallium-201 imaging J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 20, 2002; 40(10): 1816 - 1824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Voci, E. Mariano, F. Pizzuto, P. E. Puddu, and F. Romeo Coronary recanalization in anterior myocardial infarction: The open perforator hypothesis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 2, 2002; 40(7): 1205 - 1213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ruscazio, R. Montisci, P. Colonna, C. Caiati, L. Chen, G. Lai, M. Cadeddu, R. Pirisi, and S. Iliceto Detection of coronary restenosis aftercoronary angioplasty by contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiographic Doppler assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 4, 2002; 40(5): 896 - 903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Teragaki, I Toda, M Takagi, S Fukuda, K Ujino, K Takeuchi, and J Yoshikawa New applications of intracardiac echocardiography: assessment of coronary blood flow by colour and pulsed Doppler imaging in dogs Heart, September 1, 2002; 88(3): 283 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y Ueno, Y Nakamura, M Kinoshita, T Fujita, T Sakamoto, and H Okamura Can coronary flow velocity reserve determined by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography predict the recovery of regional left ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction? Heart, August 1, 2002; 88(2): 137 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Noto, K Karasawa, H Kanamaru, M Ayusawa, N Sumitomo, T Okada, and K Harada Non-invasive measurement of coronary flow reserve in children with Kawasaki disease Heart, June 1, 2002; 87(6): 559 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hozumi, M. Eisenberg, K. Sugioka, A. R. Kokkirala, H. Watanabe, M. Teragaki, J. Yoshikawa, and S. Homma Change in Coronary Flow Reserve on Transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography after a Single High-Fat Meal in Young Healthy Men Ann Intern Med, April 2, 2002; 136(7): 523 - 528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Hirata, K. Shimada, H. Watanabe, T. Muro, M. Yoshiyama, K. Takeuchi, T. Hozumi, and J. Yoshikawa Modulation of coronary flow velocity reserve by gender, menstrual cycle and hormone replacement therapy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2001; 38(7): 1879 - 1884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Watanabe, T. Akasaka, Y. Yamaura, M. Akiyama, Y. Koyama, N. Kamiyama, Y. Neishi, S. Kaji, Y. Saito, and K. Yoshida Noninvasive detection of total occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2001; 38(5): 1328 - 1332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Otsuka, H. Watanabe, K. Hirata, K. Tokai, T. Muro, M. Yoshiyama, K. Takeuchi, and J. Yoshikawa Acute Effects of Passive Smoking on the Coronary Circulation in Healthy Young Adults JAMA, July 25, 2001; 286(4): 436 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Takeuchi, C. Miyazaki, H. Yoshitani, S. Otani, K. Sakamoto, and J. Yoshikawa Assessment of coronary flow velocity with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography during dobutamine stress echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 2001; 38(1): 117 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Pizzuto, P. Voci, E. Mariano, P. Emilio Puddu, G. Sardella, and A. Nigri Assessment of flow velocity reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography and venous adenosine infusion before and after left anterior descending coronary artery stenting J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 2001; 38(1): 155 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Daimon, H. Watanabe, H. Yamagishi, T. Muro, K. Akioka, K. Hirata, K. Takeuchi, and J. Yoshikawa Physiologic assessment of coronary artery stenosis by coronary flow reserve measurements with transthoracic doppler echocardiography: comparison with exercise thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2001; 37(5): 1310 - 1315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Ruehm, C. Corot, P. Vogt, S. Kolb, and J. F. Debatin Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaque With Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Particles of Iron Oxide in Hyperlipidemic Rabbits Circulation, January 23, 2001; 103(3): 415 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Napoli and W. Palinski Maternal hypercholesterolemia during pregnancy influences the later devolopment of atherosclerosis: clinical and pathogenic implications Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2001; 22(1): 4 - 9. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. R. Hildick-Smith and L. M. Shapiro Coronary flow reserve improves after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: an adenosine transthoracic echocardiography study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2000; 36(6): 1889 - 1896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D J R Hildick-Smith, P J Johnson, C R Wisbey, E M Winter, and L M Shapiro Coronary flow reserve is supranormal in endurance athletes: an adenosine transthoracic echocardiographic study Heart, October 1, 2000; 84(4): 383 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hozumi, K. Yoshida, T. Akasaka, Y. Asami, Y. Kanzaki, Y. Ueda, A. Yamamuro, T. Takagi, and J. Yoshikawa Value of acceleration flow and the prestenotic to stenotic coronary flow velocity ratio by transthoracic color doppler echocardiography in noninvasive diagnosis of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2000; 35(1): 164 - 168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hata, M. Shiono, Y. Orime, S. Yagi, T. Yamamoto, H. Okumura, S.-i. Kimura, A. Sezai, S. Kashiwazaki, S. Choh, et al. CLINICAL RESULTS OF CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING WITH USE OF THE INTERNAL THORACIC ARTERY UNDER LOW FREE FLOW CONDITIONS J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2000; 119(1): 125 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Voci, G. Testa, G. Plaustro, and Q. Caretta Coronary Doppler intensity changes during handgrip: a new method to detect coronary vasomotor tone in coronary artery disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 1999; 34(2): 428 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Achenbach, W. Moshage, D. Ropers, J. Nossen, and W. G. Daniel Value of Electron-Beam Computed Tomography for the Noninvasive Detection of High-Grade Coronary-Artery Stenoses and Occlusions N. Engl. J. Med., December 31, 1998; 339(27): 1964 - 1971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hozumi, K. Yoshida, T. Akasaka, Y. Asami, Y. Ogata, T. Takagi, S. Kaji, T. Kawamoto, Y. Ueda, and S. Morioka Noninvasive assessment of coronary flow velocity and coronary flow velocity reserve in the left anterior descending coronary artery by Doppler echocardiography: Comparison with invasive technique J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1998; 32(5): 1251 - 1259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |