(Circulation. 1997;96:2992-2996.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Effects of Different Atrial Pacing Modes on Atrial Electrophysiology
Implicating the Mechanism of Biatrial Pacing in Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, and Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Correspondence to Shih-Ann Chen, MD, Division of Cardiology, Veterans General Hospital-Taipei, 201 Sec 2, Shih-Pai Road, Taipei, Taiwan. E-mail sachen{at}vghtpe.gov.tw
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Background Multiple-site atrial pacing has been shown to prevent recurrence of atrial fibrillation. However, information about the mechanisms of different atrial pacing modes in prevention of atrial fibrillation was not clear.
Methods and Results Forty-two patients without structural heart disease were classified into group 1 and group 2 according to absence or presence of clinical atrial fibrillation, respectively. Atrial conduction time and electrogram width of the right posterior interatrial septum (RPS) were measured during drive-train stimulation (S1) and early extrastimulation (S2). The locations of S1 were the high right atrium (HRA), distal coronary sinus (DCS), or both sites simultaneously. Effective refractory periods (ERPs) of the HRA and DCS were also determined during S1 stimulation at each site and during biatrial pacing. The ERPs were not different between single-site atrial pacing and biatrial pacing. In contrast, early S2 stimulation at the HRA caused greater atrial conduction delay and greater increment of electrogram width of the RPS in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation. Biatrial pacing significantly reduced the conduction delay and electrogram width of the RPS caused by HRA extrastimulation. In addition, in 17 group 2 patients, atrial fibrillation was induced by an early HRA S2 coupled to HRA pacing. However, with the same coupling interval of S2 at HRA, only 6 of them had the arrhythmia induced during biatrial pacing. Furthermore, conduction delay and increase of electrogram width caused by early S2 at the HRA were reduced by biatrial pacing only in patients whose arrhythmia induction was successfully prevented by biatrial pacing.
Conclusions Biatrial pacing reduced both the atrial conduction delay and increase of electrogram width at the RPS caused by early S2 at HRA, and these effects could prevent induction of atrial fibrillation.
Key Words: fibrillation • electrophysiology • pacing
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Atrial fibrillation is a common cardiac arrhythmia. It impairs synchronized atrioventricular contraction and increases the risk of systemic thromboembolism, which causes significant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.1,2 Maintenance of sinus rhythm can restore atrial contraction, improve hemodynamic performance of the heart, and reduce the risk of systemic embolism. Class IA, IC, or III antiarrhythmic drugs were used to convert atrial fibrillation and maintain sinus rhythm, but up to 50% of patients experienced recurrence in the long-term treatment.3 In addition, the proarrhythmic effects of these agents limited their widespread use, especially in patients with poor ventricular function.4-7 Nonpharmacological therapies such as maze operation, catheter ablation, atrial pacing, and defibrillation were investigated as alternative treatments.8-12 Atrial pacing has been shown to be associated with a lower incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with sick sinus syndrome.11-15 Recently, chronic atrial pacing has been shown to prevent recurrence of atrial fibrillation, and multiple-site atrial pacing offered more benefits than single-site atrial pacing.11,12 Site-dependent atrial conduction delay was suggested to play a crucial role in the induction of atrial fibrillation; furthermore, inhomogeneous conduction and dispersion of refractoriness were implicated as two major substrates for sustenance of atrial fibrillation.16-18 However, information about the electrophysiological characteristics during multiple-site atrial pacing in patients with and without atrial fibrillation and the mechanism of different atrial pacing modes in prevention of atrial fibrillation were not clear. This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of different atrial pacing modes on atrial electrophysiology and their possible mechanisms in prevention of atrial fibrillation.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Patient Population
This study population consisted of 26 men and 16 women with a mean age of 54±14 years (range, 25 to 72 years). All patients were free of structural heart disease assessed with echocardiography, coronary angiography, and contrast ventriculography. They were divided into two groups according to absence or presence of clinically documented atrial fibrillation. Group 1 included 17 patients, 9 men and 8 women, with a mean age of 49±14 years, with clinically documented supraventricular tachycardia (9 with manifest Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and 8 with a concealed accessory pathway located in the free wall), and none of these patients had a history of atrial fibrillation or flutter. Group 2 included 25 patients with clinically documented paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (3 with manifest Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, 8 with a concealed accessory pathway, and 14 with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation). There was no significant difference in age between the two groups (49±14 versus 54±14 years, P>.05).
Atrial ERP and Conduction Time Determination at
Different Atrial Pacing Modes
The study protocol was approved by the Committee on Human
Subject Research at this institution. As described previously, all
patients were studied in the postabsorptive, nonsedated state after
giving a written, informed consent, and all antiarrhythmic drugs were
discontinued for >5 half-lives.19-21 Three
quadripolar electrode catheters (2–5-2 configuration, Mansfield
Scientific Corp) were introduced from the right and left femoral veins
and positioned in the HRA, the His bundle area, and the RPS near the
coronary sinus ostium. The location of the CS ostium was
demarcated as in a previous report.22 A steerable
decapolar 7F catheter (Daig Corp) was inserted via the right internal
jugular vein into the CS as distal as possible. The five pairs of
electrodes had 2-mm interelectrode spacing within each pair and 5-mm
spacing between each pair (2-5-2-5-2-5-2-5-2 configuration).
Bipolar stimulation with a pulse width of 2 ms and output of twice diastolic threshold was performed at the distal electrode pairs of the HRA and CS catheter. Surface ECG leads I, II, and V1 and eight intracardiac electrograms (one each from the HRA, His bundle area, and RPS and five from the CS) were displayed on an oscilloscope and recorded at a paper speed of 200 mm/s, as needed (PPG, MIDAS 2500). Intracardiac electrograms were filtered from 30 to 500 Hz.
ERPs of the HRA were determined with a drive cycle length of 600 ms delivered at the HRA alone and at both the HRA and DCS simultaneously. Similarly, ERPs of the DCS were determined with a drive cycle length of 600 ms delivered at the DCS alone and at both the DCS and HRA simultaneously. Each ERP determination was performed after continuous atrial pacing at a 600-ms cycle length for 2 minutes. An extrastimulus (S2) was initially delivered at a coupling interval less than the atrial refractory period, and it was incremented by 2 ms every fourth beat until atrial capture. The atrial ERP was defined as the longest S1-S2 interval that consistently failed to evoke an atrial depolarization.
Conduction times from HRA to RPS, HRA to His bundle area, and HRA to DCS were measured at baseline drive-train stimulation (S1), the earliest premature capture beat during S1 pacing at the HRA alone. Conduction times from the HRA to the other atrial sites were also measured at the earliest premature capture beat during S1 pacing at both the HRA and DCS simultaneously. Similarly, conduction times from DCS to RPS, DCS to His bundle area, and DCS to HRA were measured at baseline drive-train stimulation, the earliest premature capture beat during S1 pacing at the CS alone. Conduction times from DCS to the other atrial sites were also measured at the earliest premature capture beat during S1 pacing at both the HRA and DCS simultaneously
The induction of atrial fibrillation by early premature extrastimulation (up to 10 ms above the ERP) was repeated twice during HRA or biatrial pacing. To avoid the interference of atrial fibrillation with subsequent conduction time and ERP determination, the sequence of stimulation was from the DCS, biatria, and HRA. If atrial fibrillation was induced by extrastimulation, it was allowed to convert to sinus rhythm spontaneously. The ERP and conduction time determinations were restarted at least 15 minutes after an atrial fibrillation episode.
Conduction Characteristics of the Posterior
Interatrial Septum
The electrogram of the width of the RPS was used to reflect the
local anisotropic factor that underlie the pattern of conduction
change.16 The electrogram width of the RPS
(recorded from the distal pair of RPS electrodes) was measured from
the beginning of the first deflection from the isoelectric line to the
end of the last deflection from the isoelectric line.
Statistical Analysis
All data are presented as mean±SD. The differences
between groups were analyzed with two-factor ANOVA with
Duncan's multiple-range test for multiple comparisons. Student's
t test was used to compare all paired data in the same
group. A value of P<.05 was considered statistically
significant.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
ERP and Conduction Time at Drive-train Stimulation
The diastolic threshold of the DCS was higher than that of HRA (0.69±0.18 versus 0.59±0.21 mA, P=.04). Also, the ERP of the HRA was significantly shorter than the ERP of the DCS (207±27 versus 241±22 ms, P<.001). The ERPs at each site were similar during single-site or biatrial drive (HRA: 207±27 versus 206±28 ms, P>.05; DCS: 241±22 versus 241±23 ms, P>.05). The intra-atrial and interatrial conduction times during HRA and DCS pacing with a cycle length of 600 ms were summarized in the Table
. To eliminate the influence
of local latency at the stimulation site, all the measured conduction
time was normalized with latency at the stimulation site. Comparing
these data revealed that conduction time from the HRA pacing site to
the RPS was significantly longer than that from the DCS pacing site to
the RPS (Table). However, conduction time from the HRA to the DCS was
similar to that from the DCS to the HRA, and conduction time from the
HRA to the His bundle area was similar to that from the DCS to the His
bundle area. Furthermore, comparison between group 1 and group 2 showed
that group 2 patients had a longer conduction time from the HRA or DCS
to other atrial sites.
|
Effect of Early Extrastimulation on the Atrial
Conduction Time
In both group 1 and group 2 patients, we compared the
conduction delay (difference of conduction time between baseline drive
and extrastimulation) induced by early extrastimuli from the HRA and
DCS. Atrial premature stimulation at the HRA caused greater conduction
delay to the His bundle area, RPS, and DCS than atrial premature
stimulation at DCS (Fig 1). Furthermore,
intergroup analysis showed that the conduction delay caused by
early premature atrial stimulation at the HRA was significantly greater
in the group 2 patients, whereas that caused by early premature atrial
stimulation at the DCS was similar between group 1 and group 2 (Fig 1).
|
Effects of Biatrial Pacing on Conduction Time
When the HRA and DCS were driven simultaneously, the
conduction delay caused by premature atrial stimulation at the HRA was
significantly reduced, whereas the conduction delay caused by premature
atrial stimulation at the DCS did not significantly change in either
group 1 or group 2 patients (Fig 1
). We further analyzed the
coupling interval from the RPS atrial electrogram (of the last S1
pacing beat) to the HRA extrastimulus; the coupling interval during
biatrial pacing was significantly longer than that during HRA pacing
alone (160±33 versus 127±34 ms, P<.001).
Then, we analyzed the induction of atrial fibrillation in
group 2 patients. Atrial fibrillation could be induced with one
extrastimulation in 18 patients; 17 patients were induced with
extrastimulation from the HRA and 1 patient with extrastimulation from
the DCS. The duration of atrial fibrillation ranged from 56 seconds to
12 minutes in the 16 patients whose atrial fibrillation converted to
sinus rhythm spontaneously. In 2 patients, atrial fibrillation was
sustained for >15 minutes; these patients were converted to sinus
rhythm with DC shock. Among the 18 patients with inducible atrial
fibrillation, 12 (group 2A) had atrial fibrillation induced with
extrastimulation at HRA when the drive-train stimulation was applied at
the HRA alone, but it became noninducible when the HRA and DCS were
driven simultaneously; in the other 6 patients (group 2B),
atrial fibrillation was induced when S1 drive-train was either from the
HRA alone or from the HRA and DCS simultaneously. The
resting sinus rate and atrial ERP were not different between groups 2A
and 2B (759±175 versus 747±124 ms, P>.05; 198±33 versus
192±16 ms, P>.05). Comparing the change of
electrophysiological characteristics during
biatrial pacing in groups 2A and 2B, we found that group 2A had less
conduction delay caused by early premature HRA stimulation than group
2B during biatrial pacing (Fig 2).
|
Effects of Biatrial Pacing on the Conduction at the
Posterior Interatrial Septum
During drive-train stimulation at the HRA, the electrogram
width of the RPS area was similar between group 1 and group 2 (Fig 3). In group 1 patients, the electrogram
width of the RPS was similar between early HRA and early DCS
extrastimuli (47±13 versus 44±13 ms, P>.05). However, the
electrogram width of the RPS during early HRA extrastimulation was
significantly longer than that during early DCS extrastimulation
(47±14 versus 40±10 ms, P=.02) in group 2 patients. Thus,
early premature HRA extrastimulation caused a greater increment of
electrogram width than did early premature DCS extrastimulation in the
group 2 but not group 1 patients (Fig 3).
|
In group 2A, increase of the electrogram width by the early HRA
extrastimulation was significantly reduced when the HRA and DCS were
simultaneously stimulated as drive-train (Fig 4). However, this result was not found in
group 2B (Fig 4).
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Major Findings
Pacing from the HRA led to greater atrial conduction delay than did that from the DCS. This conduction delay was more pronounced in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation than those without this arrhythmia. Furthermore, early premature depolarization at the HRA caused greater atrial conduction delay and increased the electrogram width of the RPS in patients with atrial fibrillation. This phenomenon might be associated with the high possibility of inducing atrial fibrillation at the HRA. Conversely, biatrial pacing was associated with a lower probability of inducing atrial fibrillation than single-site atrial pacing; it did not change the ERP of atrial tissue. Analysis of the changes of electrophysiological characteristics caused by biatrial pacing showed that successful prevention of atrial fibrillation was associated with less atrial conduction delay and less increase of electrogram width of the RPS caused by early premature HRA extrastimulation.
Conduction Delay and Initiation of Atrial Fibrillation
or Flutter
Earlier works observed that the onset of spontaneous atrial
fibrillation was preceded by early premature atrial depolarization and
was usually induced with atrial premature stimulation delivered at the
atrial vulnerable period in the electrophysiology
laboratory.23,24 In this study, we demonstrated
that patients with a clinical history of atrial fibrillation had more
atrial conduction delay than those without atrial fibrillation at
baseline drive-train stimulation. An early extrastimulation at either
the HRA or DCS resulted in further conduction delay because the
stimulation was applied at the relative refractory period of atrial
tissue. Furthermore, conduction delay caused by HRA extrastimulation
was more pronounced than that by CS extrastimulation in patients with
or without atrial fibrillation. With respect to the location of
extrastimulation, it has been shown that extrastimulation delivered at
the HRA was more likely to induce atrial fibrillation than
extrastimulation at the CS.16,25,26 In the
present study, atrial conduction delay caused by HRA
extrastimulation was exaggerated, and the possible anisotropic factor
of the RPS (presented as electrogram width of the RPS) was
significantly increased by early premature extrastimulation at the HRA
but not at the DCS in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation.
These findings suggest that atrial conduction delay and the possible
anisotropic factor of the RPS, if critical, might serve as a milieu for
reentry and initiation of atrial fibrillation.
Effects of Biatrial Pacing
Interatrial conduction block with retrograde activation of
the left atrium was reported to be associated with a high incidence of
atrial tachyarrhythmia.27 Daubert
et al28 demonstrated that biatrial pacing
prevented atrial arrhythmia in patients with advanced
interatrial block. Saksena et al11 and Prakash et
al12 also demonstrated that multiple-site atrial
pacing was more effective in prevention of recurrence of
refractory atrial fibrillation than single-site pacing. Previous
studies have demonstrated that dispersion of refractoriness and
anisotropic conduction were two essential elements for sustaining of
atrial arrhythmia.17,18 Biatrial pacing
might change the dispersion of refractoriness or anisotropic
conduction; thus, it could prevent recurrence of atrial
fibrillation. In the present study, we demonstrated that biatrial
pacing did not change the ERP; however, biatrial pacing reduced the
conduction delay and electrogram width of the RPS caused by early
premature depolarization. Prakash and
colleagues29 also reported that conduction delay
of the early HRA premature beat was less pronounced during dual-site
atrial pacing. Furthermore, biatrial pacing provided early activation
of the RPS area, which might give this area a longer interval for
recovery before the impulse of HRA extrastimulus arrived. This
suggestion was supported by our data; the coupling interval from RPS
atrial electrogram (the last S1 pacing beat) to HRA extrastimulation
was longer during biatrial pacing than that of single HRA pacing.
Lehmann et al30 demonstrated that
anterograde atrioventricular nodal conduction
was enhanced by simultaneous pacing of the atrium and
ventricle, possibly from the collision effect. This might provide
another explanation why the conduction of the early HRA depolarization
was improved during biatrial pacing. Although Wood et
al31 showed that dispersion of atrial
repolarization could be minimized by left atrial pacing only or by
biatrial pacing in the isolated rabbit heart, the difference between
repolarization and ERP and the difference between human and in vitro
animal studies required more verification.
This study demonstrated that only 6 of the 17 patients with atrial fibrillation induced by early HRA extrastimulation still had atrial fibrillation induced by the same HRA extrastimulation when drive-train stimulations were from the HRA and DCS simultaneously. Furthermore, the conduction delay caused by early HRA extrastimulation could not be reduced by biatrial pacing in the 6 patients whose atrial fibrillation could not be prevented by biatrial pacing. These findings suggested that biatrial pacing prevents the initiation of atrial fibrillation by reducing the conduction delay and increase of electrogram width of the RPS caused by early premature atrial extrastimulation.
Study Limitations
First, the patients in group 1 served as normal control
subjects, but all of them had an accessory AV pathway. This might
produce some bias. However, they all had structurally normal hearts and
no clinically documented atrial fibrillation. Second, we could not rule
out the effect of biatrial pacing on dispersion of refractoriness.
However, it was unlikely to have marked change of dispersion of
refractoriness during biatrial pacing, because the ERP of the HRA and
DCS was not changed during biatrial pacing. Third, although we did not
randomize the mode of atrial pacing, we induced atrial fibrillation
repeatedly, thus decreasing the bias. Fourth, we used the local
electrogram width of the RPS to reflect the local conduction delay.
Direct measurement of conduction velocity at the RPS may provide more
solid data. However, it is limited by the complex anatomy of
the RPS. Finally, whether the result of short-duration pacing could be
extrapolated to long-term prevention needs further investigation.
Conclusions
Patients with a history of atrial fibrillation had exaggeration of
atrial conduction delay and increasing electrogram width of the RPS by
early HRA extrastimulation. Most of the patients with atrial
fibrillation had the arrhythmia induced with extrastimulation
at the HRA. By reduction of the atrial conduction delay and electrogram
width of the RPS caused by HRA extrastimulation, biatrial pacing made
atrial fibrillation less inducible.
|
Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported in part by grants from the National Science Council (NSC-86-2314-B-010-030, 86-2314-B075-034, and 86-2314-B-075-098) and Tzou's Foundation (VGHYM-S4-30 and VGHYM-S4-31), Taipei, Taiwan.
Received April 24, 1997; revision received July 24, 1997; accepted August 13, 1997.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Kopecky SL, Gersh BJ, McGoon MD, Whisnant JP, Holmes DR Jr, Ilstrup DM, Frye RL. The natural history of lone atrial fibrillation: a population-based study over three decades. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:669-674.[Abstract]
2.
Brand FN, Abbott RD, Kannel WB, Wolf PA.
Characteristics and prognosis of lone atrial fibrillation: 30-year
follow-up in the Framingham Study. JAMA. 1985;254:3449-3453.
3. Fuchs T, Podrid PJ. Pharmacologic therapy for revision of atrial fibrillation and maintenance of sinus rhythm. In: Falk RH, Podrid PJ, ed. Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanisms and Management. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1992:253-254.
4.
Coplen SE, Antman EM, Berlin JA, Hewitt P, Chalmers
TC. Efficacy and safety of quinidine therapy for maintenance of
sinus rhythm after cardioversion: a meta-analysis of randomized
control trials. Circulation. 1990;82:1106-1116.
5. Flaker GC, Blackshear JL, McBride R, Kronmal RA, Halperin JL, Hart RG. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy and cardiac mortality in atrial fibrillation: the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:527-532.[Abstract]
6. Echt DS, Liebson PR, Mitchell LB, Peters RW, Obias-Manno D, Barker AH, Arensberg D, Baker A, Friedman L, Greene HL, and the CAST Investigators. Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo: the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:781-788.[Abstract]
7. Feld GK, Chen PS, Nicod P, Fleck RP, Meyer D. Possible atrial proarrhythmic effects of class IC antiarrhythmic drugs. Am J Cardiol. 1990;66:378-383.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Cox JL. The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation, IV: surgical technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;101:584-592.[Abstract]
9. Haissaguerre M, Gencel L, Fischer B, Le Metayer P, Poquet F, Marcus FI, Clementy J. Successful catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1994;5:1045-1052.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah CD, Gencel L, Pradeau V, Garrigues S, Chouari S, Hocini M, Metayer PL, Roudaut R, Clementy J. Right and left atrial radiofrequency catheter therapy of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996;7:1132-1144.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Saksena S, Prakash A, Hill M, Krol RB, Munsif AN, Mathew PP, Mehra R. Prevention of recurrent atrial fibrillation with chronic dual-site right atrial pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:687-694.[Abstract]
12. Prakash A, Vardas P, Delfaut P, Simantirakis EN, Krol R, Munsif A, Lewis C, Saksena S. Multicenter experience with single and dual site atrial pacing in refractory atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997;20(suppl):1074. Abstract.
13. Attuel P, Pellerin D, Mugica J, Coumel PH. DDD pacing: an effective treatment modality for recurrent atrial arrhythmias. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1988;11:1647-1654.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Maloney JD, Simmons TW,
Wilkoff BL, Castle LW, Trohman RG. Chronic atrial fibrillation and
stroke in paced patients with sick sinus syndrome: relevance of
clinical characteristics and pacing modalities. Circulation. 1993;88:1045-1053.
15. Andersen HR, Thuesen L, Bagger JP, Vesterlund T, Thomsen PEB. Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet. 1994;344:1523-1528.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Papageorgiou P, Monahan K, Boyle NG, Seifert MJ,
Beswick P, Zebede J, Epstein LM, Josephson ME. Site-dependent
intra-atrial conduction delay: relationship to initiation of atrial
fibrillation. Circulation. 1996;94:384-389.
17.
Spach MS, Dolber PC, Heidlage JF. Influence of the
passive anisotropic properties on directional differences in
propagation following modification of the sodium conductance in human
atrial muscle: a model of reentry based on anisotropic discontinuous
propagation. Circ Res. 1988;62:811-832.
18.
Allessie MA, Bonke FIM, Schopman FJG. Circus
movement in rabbit atrial muscle as a mechanism of
tachycardia, II: the role of nonuniform recovery of
excitability in the occurrence of unidirectional block, as studied with
multiple microelectrodes. Circ Res. 1976;39:168-177.
19.
Chen SA, Lee SH, Chiang CE, Tai CT, Wu TJ, Cheng CC,
Wen ZC, Chiou CW, Ueng KC, Chang MS.
Electrophysiological mechanisms in successful
radiofrequency catheter modification of
atrioventricular junction for patients with medically
refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1996;93:1690-1701.
20. Yu WC, Chen SA, Chiang CE, Tai CT, Lee SH, Chiou CW, Ueng KC, Wen ZC, Chen YJ, Huang JL, Feng AN, Chang MS. Effect of high intensity drive train stimulation on dispersion of atrial refractoriness: role of autonomic nervous system. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:1000-1006.[Abstract]
21.
Chen SA, Chiang CE, Tai CT, Lee SH, Chiou CW, Ueng KC,
Wen ZC, Cheng CC, Chang MS. Longitudinal clinical and
electrophysiological assessment of patients
with symptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and
atrioventricular nodal reentrant
tachycardia. Circulation. 1996;93:2023-2032.
22.
Chiang CE, Chen SA, Tai CT, Wu TJ, Lee SH, Cheng CC,
Chiou CW, Ueng KC, Wen ZC, Chang MS. Predication of successful ablation
site of concealed posteroseptal accessory pathways by a
novel algorithm using baseline
electrophysiological
parameters: implication for an abbreviated ablation
procedure. Circulation. 1996;93:982-991.
23. Killip T, Gault JH. Mode of onset of atrial fibrillation in man. Am Heart J. 1965;70:173-179.
24.
Haft J, Lau SH, Stein E, Kosowsky BD, Damato AN. Atrial
fibrillation produced by atrial stimulation. Circulation. 1968;37:70-74.
25. Watson RM, Josephson ME. Atrial flutter, I: electrophysiologic substrates and modes of initiation and termination. Am J Cardiol.. 1980;45:732-741.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Josephson ME. Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: Techniques and Interpretation. Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febiger; 1993;275-310.
27.
Luna ABL, Cladellas M, Oter R, Torner P, Guindo J, Mari
V, Rivera K, Iturralde P. Interatrial conduction block and retrograde
activation of the left atrium and paroxysmal
supraventricular tachyarrhythmia. Eur
Heart J. 1988;9:1112-1118.
28. Daubert C, Gras D, Berder V, Leclerq C, Mabo P. Permanent atrial resynchronization by synchronous bi-atrial pacing in the preventive treatment of atrial flutter associated with high degree interatrial block (in French). Arch Mal Coeur Vaisseaux. 1994;87(suppl):1535-1546.
29. Prakash A, Munsif A, Krol R, Mill M, Delfaut P, Mathew P, Giorgberidze I, Mehra R, Saksena S. Regional atrial conduction delays vary for short coupled premature beats during single and dual site atrial pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29(suppl):253A. Abstract.
30.
Lehmann MH, Mahmud R, Denker S, Soni J, Akhtar M.
Retrograde concealed conduction in the atrioventricular
node: differential manifestations related to level of intranodal
penetration. Circulation. 1984;70:392-401.
31.
Wood MA, Mangano RA, Schieken RM, Baumgarten CM,
Simpson PM, Ellenbogen KA. Modulation of atrial repolarization by site
of pacing in the isolated rabbit heart. Circulation. 1996;94:1465-70.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  T. Szili-Torok, L. Jordaens, and R. Sutton Alternative pacing sites at the atrial level Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2007; 9(suppl_I): I33 - I36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Ryu, R. N. Ghanem, C. M. Khrestian, N. Matsumoto, R. N. Goldstein, J. Sahadevan, P. C. Dorostkar, and A. L. Waldo Comparative effects of single- and linear triple-site rapid bipolar pacing on atrial activation in canine models Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2005; 289(1): H374 - H384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M Takagi, A Doi, N Shirai, K Hirata, Y Takemoto, K Takeuchi, and J Yoshikawa Acute improvement of atrial mechanical stunning after electrical cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation: comparison between biatrial and single atrial pacing Heart, January 1, 2005; 91(1): 58 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Doi, M Takagi, I Toda, M Yoshiyama, K Takeuchi, and J Yoshikawa Acute haemodynamic benefits of biatrial atrioventricular sequential pacing: comparison with single atrial atrioventricular sequential pacing Heart, April 1, 2004; 90(4): 411 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W.-K. Au, S.-W. Chiu, M.-P. Sun, L.-C. Cheung, and L.-C. Cheng Biatrial Pacing to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 2003; 11(3): 222 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. L. Creswell and R. J. Damiano Jr Postoperative atrial fibrillation: An old problem crying for new solutions J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2003; 125(90030): S20 - 23. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.-P. Lau Pacing for atrial fibrillation Heart, January 1, 2003; 89(1): 106 - 112. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Szili-Torok, G.-J. P. Kimman, M. F. Scholten, J. Ligthart, N. Bruining, D. A. M. J. Theuns, P. J. Klootwijk, J. R. T. C. Roelandt, and L. J. Jordaens Interatrial septum pacing guided bythree-dimensional intracardiac echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 18, 2002; 40(12): 2139 - 2143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Saksena, A. Prakash, P. Ziegler, J. D. Hummel, P. Friedman, V. J. Plumb, D. G. Wyse, E. Johnson, S. Fitts, R. Mehra, et al. Improved suppression of recurrent atrial fibrillation with dual-site right atrial pacing and antiarrhythmic drug therapy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 18, 2002; 40(6): 1140 - 1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Padeletti, P. Pieragnoli, C. Ciapetti, A. Colefa, N. Musilli, M.C. Porciani, A. Michelucci, and G.F. Gensini Prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by permanent septal atrial pacing: long-term follow up Eur. Heart J. Suppl., November 1, 2001; 3(suppl_P): P2 - P6. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. L. Creswell and R. J. Damiano Jr Postoperative atrial fibrillation: An old problem crying for new solutions J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2001; 121(4): 638 - 641. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T Levy, S Walker, S Rex, J Rochelle, and V Paul No incremental benefit of multisite atrial pacing compared with right atrial pacing in patients with drug refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation Heart, January 1, 2001; 85(1): 48 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Fan, K. L. Lee, C. S.W. Chiu, J. W.T. Lee, G.-W. He, D. Cheung, M. P. Sun, and C.-P. Lau Effects of Biatrial Pacing in Prevention of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Circulation, August 15, 2000; 102(7): 755 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. G. Daoud, R. Dabir, M. Archambeau, F. Morady, and S. A. Strickberger Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Simultaneous Right and Left Atrial Epicardial Pacing for Prevention of Post-Open Heart Surgery Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, August 15, 2000; 102(7): 761 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D H Bennett Comparison of the acute effects of pacing the atrial septum, right atrial appendage, coronary sinus os, and the latter two sites simultaneously on the duration of atrial activation Heart, August 1, 2000; 84(2): 193 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H.-F. Tse, C.-P. Lau, and G.M. Ayers Atrial pacing for suppression of early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversion Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2000; 21(14): 1167 - 1176. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Becker, R. Klinkott, A. Bauer, J. C. Senges, K. D. Schreiner, F. Voss, W. Kuebler, and W. Schoels Multisite pacing for prevention of atrial tachyarrhythmias: potential mechanisms J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 2000; 35(7): 1939 - 1946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. C. Daubert and P. Mabo Atrial pacing for the prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation: how and where to pace? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2000; 35(6): 1423 - 1427. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. X. Roithinger, J. Cheng, A. SippensGroenewegen, R. J. Lee, L. A. Saxon, M. M. Scheinman, and M. D. Lesh Use of Electroanatomic Mapping to Delineate Transseptal Atrial Conduction in Humans Circulation, October 26, 1999; 100(17): 1791 - 1797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.-H. Lee, F.-Y. Lin, W.-C. Yu, J.-J. Cheng, P. Kuan, C.-R. Hung, M.-S. Chang, and S.-A. Chen Regional Differences in the Recovery Course of Tachycardia-Induced Changes of Atrial Electrophysiological Properties Circulation, March 9, 1999; 99(9): 1255 - 1264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||