(Circulation. 1997;96:2842-2848.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Effect of a Heart Failure Program on Hospitalization Frequency and Exercise Tolerance
From the Division of Cardiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn.
Correspondence to John R Wilson MD, Division of Cardiology, 315 MRB II, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232-6300.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Background Most patients with heart failure are currently managed by physicians with little specific expertise in heart failure. This management system has been associated with evidence of suboptimal care, such as high rates of hospital readmission and underuse of ACE inhibitors. The current study was undertaken to determine whether hospitalization rates and functional outcomes are improved when patients are managed by physicians with special expertise in heart failure working in a dedicated heart failure program.
Methods and Results All patients with heart failure
referred to the Vanderbilt Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation
Program between July 1994 and June 1995 were identified. Annual
hospitalization rates, medications, and peak exercise capacity before
and after referral were compared in patients followed for >30 days. A
total of 187 patients were referred during the index time period, of
whom 134 (72%) were followed for >30 days. During the year before
referral, 94% of the patients were hospitalized (210
cardiovascular hospitalizations) versus 44% of the
patients during the year after referral (104 hospitalizations) (53%
reduction) (P<.01). Hospitalizations for heart failure
decreased from 164 to 60 for all patients regardless of follow-up
duration and decreased from 97 to 30 (69% reduction) for patients
followed at least 1 year after referral. Eighty-eight of the patients
were able to exercise at the time of referral. Peak exercise
O2 in this group increased from
12.8±4.7 to 15.7±4.8 mL · min-1 · kg-1
(P<.01) by 6 months after referral. Loop diuretic
doses were on averaged doubled during the first 6 months after
referral.
Conclusions These findings suggest that patients with heart failure have fewer hospitalizations for heart failure and are significantly more functional when managed by heart failure specialists working in a dedicated heart failure program rather than by physicians with limited expertise in heart failure.
Key Words: heart failure • outcomes • exercise
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Heart failure is a chronic disease associated with frequent hospitalizations, widespread functional impairment, and a high mortality rate.1 2 3 Despite these serious outcomes, the vast majority of patients with heart failure are currently managed by physicians with limited expertise in heart failure. Most of these physicians are primary care physicians and internists. Approximately 20% of the patients are managed by cardiologists.3 However, few of these cardiologists have special training in heart failure.
Under this system, the cost of caring for patients with heart failure has reached crisis proportions while the quality of care has been suboptimal. Each year, patients with heart failure are hospitalized >2 million times and generate >11 million outpatient visits, resulting in annual costs in excess of $38 billion.2 Readmission rates remain high, while utilization rates of ACE inhibitors, a class of medication clearly indicated in heart failure, remain low.3 4 5 6
Recently, it has been suggested that centers specializing in the management of patients with heart failure may be able to improve these outcomes.7 8 However, to date, there is limited evidence to support this presumption. The present study was undertaken to investigate this hypothesis by comparing hospitalization rates, medication use, and exercise capacity of patients with heart failure before and after referral to the Vanderbilt Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation Program.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
All patients with heart failure referred to the Vanderbilt Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation Program between July 1994 and June 1995 were identified (Table 1
). A total
of 187 patients were referred, 138 as ambulatory outpatients.
Cardiologists were involved in the referral of all patients. Forty-nine
patients were transferred to Vanderbilt Hospital from other hospitals.
Fifty-four patients were women and 133 were men. The average age of the
patients was 52±12 years. Heart failure was due to coronary
artery disease in 81 patients, nonischemic
cardiomyopathy in 97 patients, and other causes in
the remaining patients.
|
A total of 134 of the 187 patients were followed on a long-term basis (>30 days) as outpatients by the Heart Failure and Heart Transplant Program and were the focus of this study. Fifty-three patients were excluded from analysis. Nine patients were listed for heart transplantation, made United Network of Organ Sharing status 1 within 30 days of referral, and subsequently underwent transplantation. Twelve patients died within 30 days of referral. Twenty-nine patients were referred back to their local physician primarily because of minimal or no left ventricular dysfunction. Three patients were transferred to other health care systems due to insurance issues.
Program Description
Patients were followed on a long-term basis by three physicians
who work exclusively with heart failure and heart transplantation
patients. Two nurse coordinators assisted with the management of
patients both during hospitalizations and as outpatients. Home health
agencies were involved in the care of 
10% of the patients.
All patients referred to the program undergo echocardiographic evaluation and, whenever possible, cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Exercise testing is typically repeated at 3 to 6 months to monitor patient status, if the patient is able to exercise. Exercise testing with concurrent hemodynamic monitoring is used extensively in the evaluation and management of patients, as described previously.9 10
Program offices are based in a single area in the Vanderbilt outpatient office building. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and exercise hemodynamic testing are performed by program staff in an outpatient laboratory adjacent to the office area. Patient information and outcomes are maintained in a Microsoft Access database. Periodic meetings are held with Vanderbilt Home Health Agency and local hospice care programs to integrate patient care.
Hospitalization
Hospitalization frequency in the 134 ambulatory patients
followed for >30 days was compared before and after referral. The
number of hospitalizations during the year before referral was
determined by patient history and review of previous medical
records. Hospitalizations after referral both at Vanderbilt Medical
Center and at other hospitals was compiled in an Access
database.
Not all patients were followed a full year after referral due to, for example, deaths and heart transplantation; therefore, annualized hospitalization rates were calculated using life-table analysis. Patients who were lost to follow-up, underwent heart transplantation, or died were treated as censored events.
Medications
The use of digoxin, ACE inhibitors, and
diuretics at the time of patient referral was compared with
utilization rates at 6 months after referral. Loop diuretic
doses were calculated as furosemide equivalent doses by multiplying the
bumetanide dose by 40 and the torsemide dose by 2. Doses of ACE
inhibitors were converted to captopril equivalent doses by
multiplying the total daily dose by the following correction factors:
enalapril (3.75), captopril (1.0), lisinopril (3.75),
quinapril (1.88), and ramipril (7.5).
Exercise Capacity
Maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing was
routinely performed on all stable ambulatory patients at the time of
referral and at 3 to 6 months after referral. Eighty-eight patients
underwent such testing. The exercise test performed at the time of
referral was considered a reflection of the patient's exercise
performance before referral and was compared with the test
performed at 3 to 6 months. Patients who were initially hospitalized,
stabilized, and then followed as outpatients also underwent exercise
testing at 3 to 6 months. These patients were excluded from exercise
analysis because a baseline measurement was not available.
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing was performed after a 3-hour fast with the use of a Marquette treadmill and a MedGraphics CardioO2 System. After 3 minutes of resting data acquisition, symptom-limited exercise testing was performed using a 3 minute/stage Naughton protocol. All patients discontinued exercise due to a combination of dyspnea and fatigue. Arterial hemoglobin O2 saturation was monitored continuously via a pulse oximeter.
Peak exercise O2 was defined as
the highest O2 achieved at peak
exercise. The anaerobic threshold was defined using three
criteria: the point after which the respiratory gas exchange ratio
(CO2/O2)
consistently exceeded the resting ratio, the point at which the
ventilatory equivalent for oxygen
(VE/O2) was minimal followed
by a progressive increase in
VE/O2, and the
O2 after which a nonlinear rise in
VE occurred relative to
O2.11 12 If these three
criteria identified different anaerobic thresholds,
threshold values were averaged.
At the time of exercise testing, a subgroup of patients completed the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire.13 14 The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire consists of 21 questions, each of which assesses the patient's perception of how his or her emotional and physical state is impaired by heart failure. The answer to each question ranges from a score of 0 (No impairment) to 5 (Very much impaired), so the total score can range from 0 to 105. The higher the score, the more severe is the impairment.
Data Analysis
All data are expressed as mean±SD. Differences between
groups were evaluated by ANOVA or 
2
analysis. Differences within groups were compared using
Student's t test. Probability of survival and probability
of survival without hospital admission were analyzed by the
life-table method. Curves were compared using the log-rank test and
Wilcoxon analysis. Outcomes were defined as sudden
death if the event occurred out of hospital without
symptomatic deterioration within the preceding 24 hours or
as progressive heart failure in patients with progressive
symptomatic or hemodynamic deterioration.
Cardiac transplantation was treated as a censored observation (ie,
withdrawn at the time of transplantation). Patients lost to follow-up
were also treated as a censored event. A value of P<.05 was
considered statistically significant.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Hospitalizations
A total of 187 patients were referred during the index time period, of whom 134 (72%) were followed for >30 days. During the year before referral, 88% of the patients were hospitalized. The calculated annualized rate of first hospitalization for these patients was 94% at 1 year (Fig 1
). The incidence of first
hospitalization increased during the 2 months before referral; often,
such hospitalizations precipitated referral.
|
During the year after referral, the annual rate of
hospitalization was reduced to 44% (53% reduction)
(P<.001) (Fig 1
). Total cardiovascular
hospitalizations decreased from 210 to 104 (P<.01),
primarily due to a decrease in hospitalizations for decompensated heart
failure from 164 to 60 (Table 2).
|
Ninety patients were followed for an entire year after referral.
In these patients, total cardiovascular
hospitalizations decreased from 131 during the year before referral
(1.46 hospitalizations/year) to 62 (0.69 hospitalizations/year) during
the year after referral. This reduction was primarily due to a decrease
in hospitalizations for heart failure from 97 to 30 occurrences (both
P<.01). There were 34 non–heart failure hospitalizations
in the year before referral versus 32 after referral (P=NS).
Reductions in hospitalization for heart failure was observed in these
patients regardless of how many hospitalizations were noted during the
year before referral (Fig 2).
|
To determine whether the use of heart transplantation influenced
this reduction in hospitalization rates, hospitalization frequency was
analyzed with all patients listed for heart transplantation
during the year after referral excluded from the analysis.
Removal of patients listed for transplantation had little affect on the
results. Ninety-four percent of patients were hospitalized during the
year before referral versus 41% during the year after referral
(P<.015) (Fig 3).
|
Survival
Fifteen of the 134 patients followed for >30 days died during the
subsequent year: 12 from sudden death and 3 from low output heart
failure. Eight patients underwent heart transplantation, 9 returned to
their local medical physician due to improvement, and 9 were lost to
follow-up. One-year survival for the entire group was 87% (Fig 4).
|
Maximal Exercise Capacity
Changes in maximal exercise capacity were compared in 88
patients who were ambulatory at the time of referral and underwent
maximal exercise testing at that time (Fig 5). On repeat exercise testing at 3 to 6
months, peak exercise O2 had increased
from 12.8±4.7 to 15.7±4.8 mL ·
min-1 · kg-1
(P<.001). The anaerobic threshold increased
from 10.4±2.4 to 11.4±2.7 mL ·
min-1 · kg-1
(P<.002). Thirty-four of these patients also completed the
Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire at baseline and at 3 to 6
months; composite scores improved from 57±27 to 35±26
(P<.01).
|
Medications
At the time of referral, 76% of the patients were receiving
ACE inhibitors. Forty-three percent were receiving
captopril, 56% enalapril, and 1% other agents. By 6 months, 74% were
receiving ACE inhibitors: 37% captopril, 61% enalapril,
and 2% other agents. Eighty-eight percent were receiving digoxin on
referral; 7 additional patients (5%) were placed on digoxin after
referral. Average doses were not changed (Table 3).
|
One-hundred twenty-four patients (93%) were receiving loop
diuretics, 4 thiazide diuretics, and 6 no
diuretics. Five were also receiving metolazone on referral. By
6 months, the average loop diuretic dose had been increased
from 94±84 to 181±165 mg (P<.001), and 6 additional
patients had been placed on metolazone therapy (Table 3).
At baseline, 14 patients were receiving antiarrhythmic agents. Six patients were receiving amiodarone and 1 sotalol for atrial fibrillation or sustained ventricular tachycardia. These medications were maintained. Seven patients were receiving agents for nonsustained, asymptomatic ventricular tachycardia (mexiletine, 5; quinidine, 1; tocainide, 1). All of these agents were stopped except for mexiletine in 1 patient.
At baseline, 3 patients were receiving amlodipine. This agent was stopped in all 3 patients. One patient was receiving vesnarinone as part of a study initiated at another center; this agent was maintained during the study.
Eleven patients were receiving a ß-blocker at the time of referral. The ß-blocker was continued in 8 of these patients and stopped in 3. Eight patients were begun on a ß-blocker during the year after referral, 1 on metoprolol, and 7 on carvedilol.
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
At present, most patients with heart failure are managed by primary care physicians and internists with little special expertise in heart failure.3 It is becoming clear that this system results in excessive costs and relatively poor outcomes.1 2 3 4 5 6 Consequently, multiple groups have been trying to develop new management systems for heart failure that will provide better outcomes at lower cost.
One approach that has received considerable recent attention has been the development of core resources to help generalists manage patients with heart failure. These core resources were recently summarized in a Cardiology Preeminence Roundtable publication assembled by the Advisory Board Company.5 Proposed core resources included outpatient heart failure clinics staffed by specialized nurses, home health care cardiac specialists, community-based case managers, patient "telemanagement," hospital-sponsored cardiac rehabilitation, short-stay observation units for patients with decompensated heart failure, and inpatient heart failure subacute care facilities.
To date, most evidence suggests that development of such core resources can reduce hospitalization frequency6 15 16 ; however, there is some evidence that core resources can sometimes increase the cost of care. For example, investigators at Veterans Administration Hospitals recently completed a multicenter trial in which 504 patients hospitalized with heart failure were randomly assigned to either usual care or intensive follow-up and intervention by a nurse and primary care physician.17 The patients subjected to intensive follow-up had a higher readmission rate per month than the control group, possibly because patients were more able to express complaints when seen more frequently.
Another model for managing patients with heart failure is the development of heart failure centers staffed by physicians who exclusively manage patients with heart failure. Theoretically, this system should produce better outcomes than systems managed by generalists. However, to date there is limited evidence to support this conclusion aside from a recent preliminary report by Fonarow et al7 describing a dramatic decrease in hospitalization rates and improvement in exercise capacity in 214 patients listed for heart transplantation at the University of California Los Angeles Medical Center.
The present study was undertaken to examine outcomes in patients managed by the Vanderbilt Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation Program. This program is staffed by physicians and nurses who exclusively manage patients with heart failure. In addition, program physicians routinely use cardiopulmonary exercise testing and hemodynamic monitoring at rest and during exercise to manage patients, based on evidence that such testing provides prognostic and therapeutic information.9 10 18 19 20
Outcomes were examined in all patients referred over a 1-year period and who were subsequently followed as an outpatient for >30 days. Patients who were followed for <30 days due to death, immediate listing for heart transplantation as United Network for Organ Sharing status 1 patients, and referral back to their local physician were not included in the analysis. These patients were excluded based on the premise that outcomes in this groups largely reflected management of the patients before referral. All patients were managed exclusively by physicians in the Vanderbilt Heart Failure and Heart Transplant Program.
After referral, patients exhibited a 50% reduction in
hospitalization frequency. This reduction was primarily due to a
decrease in hospitalizations for heart failure, not to a reduction in
hospitalizations for other problems such as arrhythmias,
angina, and myocardial infarction. This is not particularly surprising,
since it is unlikely that management of the patients over only 1 year
would decrease ischemic burdens or propensity for
arrhythmias.
Fonarow et al7 reported a much more striking reduction in hospitalization frequency in their preliminary report. The reason for this difference is not entirely clear, but it may be due to patient selection. All of their patients were listed for heart transplantation, whereas most patients in the present study were not listed for transplantation. It is not uncommon for listed patients who decompensate to be hospitalized as status 1 patients until the time of transplantation, thereby avoiding further hospitalizations. Frequent use of this strategy by Fonarow et al could explain the dramatic reduction in hospitalization frequency.
To determine whether the availability of heart transplantation at
our center was responsible for the reduction in hospitalization
frequency, we examined annual hospitalization rates in patients not
listed for heart transplantation (Fig 3). Hospitalization rates were
reduced by >50% even when patients listed for transplantation were
excluded.
In any event, our results and the preliminary results of Fonarow et al suggest that heart failure programs directed by specialists in heart failure can markedly reduce hospitalization rates in heart failure. In contrast, two recent randomized studies suggest that management systems directed by nurses or primary care physicians may have less of an affect on patient outcomes. Rich et al6 examined the affect of a nurse-directed multidisciplinary approach on readmission rates in 282 elderly patients with heart failure and a high risk of readmission. Patients were randomized to standard treatment by their primary physician or to a treatment regimen consisting of intensive education, social-service consultation, an analysis of medications by a geriatric cardiologist, and intensive follow-up after discharge through home care services. Survival for 90 days without readmission, the primary end point of the study, was not significantly different between the two groups. When the analysis was restricted to survivors of the initial hospitalization, a modest but significant decrease in survival for 90 days without readmission was noted (controls, 67%; treatment, 54%; 19% reduction). The total number of readmissions was 94 in the control group versus 53 in the treatment group, reflecting a decrease of 44% (P<.02). However, this decrease appeared to be primarily due to a marked reduction in the number of readmissions by a small subgroup of patients readmitted at least two times.
As noted previously, investigators at Veterans Administration hospitals compared rehospitalization rates in 504 Veterans Administration patients with heart failure randomized to standard care versus close follow-up by a nurse and primary care physician.17 The patients subjected to intensive follow-up had a higher readmission rate/month and a 70% increase in days of rehospitalization compared with the control group.
It is important to emphasize, however, that patient selection and the methodology used by these randomized trials differed from the approach used both in the present study and by Fonarow et al.7 Our study and that of Fonarow et al compared changes in outcomes over time within a somewhat younger population. To clearly establish whether management by heart failure specialists produces better outcomes than management by nurses or primary care physicians, patients should be randomly assigned to these different systems, and outcomes should then be compared.
The decrease in heart failure admissions observed in the present study may have been due at least in part to more aggressive use of diuretic therapy. On average, loop diuretic doses were doubled after referral to treat obvious fluid overloading detected at the time of referral or documented at the time of Swan-Ganz catheterization. We and others have noted that a large number of patients with heart failure appear by physical examination to be in optimal fluid balance but, when evaluated with Swan-Ganz catheters, are found to have markedly elevated intracardiac pressures.18 19 20 Recently, we reported that these patients respond to aggressive diuresis with improved exertional symptoms.18 Stevenson et al19 20 also noted the utility of hemodynamic monitoring in managing patients with heart failure. At the time of referral, most patients were already receiving ACE inhibitors and digoxin.
The reduction in hospitalization frequency was accompanied by an
increase in peak exercise O2 and the
anaerobic threshold. In a subgroup of unselected patients,
Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire composite scores also improved.
These findings suggest that patients were symptomatically
improved after referral. This improvement may have been due to
increased diuretic doses. In addition, patients were frequently
encouraged to be inactive by referring physicians. After referral,
patients were usually encouraged to become more active, an intervention
that likely also improved exercise performance.
Survival at 1 year in our population was surprisingly good: 83%.
A number of prior studies have demonstrated a relationship between peak
exercise O2 and
survival21 22 23 and have suggested annual mortality rates of
>25% in patients with peak O2 levels
similar to levels noted in our study population. The majority of deaths
was due to sudden death rather than to progressive heart failure,
whereas in large studies such as the SOLVD trial, the majority of
deaths are usually due to heart failure.24 Stevenson et
al23 also noted more sudden deaths than deaths due to
heart failure in their population. The aggressive use of
hemodynamic monitoring and correction of high
intracardiac pressures both in our program and in that of Stevenson et
al may decrease the frequency of death due to heart failure. However,
it should be noted that the aggressive use of diuretics can
increase activation of the renin-angiotensin system and
produce electrolyte imbalances, changes that could decrease long-term
survival and increase the incidence of sudden death.
Another factor that may have influenced survival and hospitalization outcomes was more appropriate use of antiarrhythmic agents and ß-blockers. Antiarrhythmic agents were discontinued in patients being treated for nonsustained, asymptomatic ventricular tachycardia based on the lack of evidence that this therapy improves survival. Amlodipine was discontinued in 3 patients based on the lack of clear evidence that this intervention is beneficial. Finally, 8 patients were placed on ß-blocker therapy, an intervention that may have improved survival.25 These changes are consistent with the suggestion of Ayanian et al26 that specialist physicians aware of key advances in a field generally use medications more appropriately than do generalists. Unfortunately, only a small number of patients had changes in their medication, so multivariate analysis could not be reliably used to determine the impact of such changes on outcomes.
In summary, our findings suggest that patients with heart failure have fewer hospitalizations and demonstrate functional improvement when their care is transferred from generalists to cardiologists and a support staff who specialize in the management of such patients.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid from the National American Heart Association. We would like to thank Lori Miller, RN, and Ann Bishop, RN, for their assistance in data acquisition and analysis.
Received April 7, 1997; revision received June 5, 1997; accepted June 19, 1997.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Schocken DD, Arrieta MI, Leaverton PE, Ross EA. Prevalence and mortality rate of congestive heart failure in the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:301-306.[Abstract]
2. O'Connell JB, Bristow MR. Economic impact of heart failure in the United States: time for a different approach. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1994;13:S107-S112.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Bourassa MG, Gurne O, Bangdiwala SI, Ghali JK, Young JB, Rousseau M, Johnstone, DE, Yusuf, S. Natural history and patterns of current practice in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22(suppl A):14A-19A.
4.
Krumholz HM, Parent EM, Tu N, Vaccarino V, Wang Y,
Radford MJ, Hennen J. Readmission after hospitalization for
congestive heart failure among Medicare beneficiaries.
Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:99-104.
5. Beyond Four Walls: Cost-Effective Management of Chronic Congestive Heart Failure. Washington, DC: Advisory Board Company; 1994.
6.
Rich MW, Beckham V, Wittenberg C, Leven CL, Freedland
KE, Carney RM. A multidisciplinary intervention to prevent the
readmission of elderly patients with congestive heart failure.
N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1190-1195.
7. Fonarow GC, Stevenson LW, Walden JA, Stevenson LW, Walden JA, Hamilton MA, Natterson BJ, Steimle AE, Moriguchi Jaime D, Middlekauff, HR. Impact of a comprehensive management program on the hospitalization rate for patients with advanced heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995(suppl):25:264A. Abstract.
8. Stevenson LW, Steimle AE, Fonarow G, Kermani M, Hamilton, MA, Moriguchi JD, Walden J, Tillisch JH, Drinkwater DC. Improvement in exercise capacity of candidates awaiting heart transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:163-170.[Abstract]
9.
Wilson JR, Groves J, Rayos G. Circulatory
status and response to cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart
failure. Circulation. 1996;94:1567-1572.
10.
Chomsky DB, Lang CC, Rayos GH, Shyr Y, Yeoh TK, Pierson
RN, Davis SF, Wilson JR. Hemodynamic exercise
testing: a valuable tool in the selection of cardiac transplantation
candidates. Circulation. 1996;94:3176-3183.
11.
Wasserman K, Whipp BJ, Koyal SN, Beaver WL.
Anaerobic threshold and respiratory gas exchange during
exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1973;35:236-243.
12. Wilson JR, Fink LI, Ferraro N, Dunkman WB, Jones RA. Use of maximal bicycle exercise testing with respiratory gas analysis to assess exercise performance in patients with congestive heart failure secondary to coronary artery disease or to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1986;58:601-606.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Rector TS, Kubo SH, Cohn JN. Patients self-assessment of their congestive heart failure: content, reliability and validity of a new measure, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire. Heart Failure. 1987;3:198-209.
14. Rector TS, Cohn JN. Assessment of patient outcome with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire: reliability and validity during a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pimobendan. Am Heart J. 1992;124:1017-1025.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Wasson J, Gaudette C, Whaley F, Sauvigne A, Baribeau P,
Welch HG. Telephone care as a substitute for routine clinic
follow-up. JAMA. 1992;267:1788-1793.
16. Singh P. Managing chronic congestive heart failure in the home. Home Healthcare Nurse. 1995;13:11-13.
17.
Weinberger M, Oddone EZ, Henderson WG. Does
increased access to primary care reduce hospital readmissions?
N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1441-1447.
18. Chomsky DB, Lang CC, Rayos G, Wilson JR. Treatment of subclinical fluid retention in patients with symptomatic heart failure: effect on exercise performance. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1997;16:846-853.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Stevenson LW, Dracup KA, Tillisch JH. Efficacy of medical therapy tailored for severe congestive heart failure in patients transferred for urgent cardiac transplantation. Am J Cardiol. 1989;63:461-464.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Stevenson LW. Tailored therapy before transplantation for treatment of advanced heart failure: effective use of vasodilators and diuretics. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1991;10:468-476.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Cohn JN, Johnson G, Shabetai R, Loeb H, Tristani F, Rector T, Smith R, Fletcher R, for the V-HeFT VA Cooperative Studies Group. Ejection fraction, peak exercise oxygen consumption, cardiothoracic ratio, ventricular arrhythmias, and plasma norepinephrine as determinants of prognosis in heart failure. Circulation. 1993;87(suppl VI):VI-5-VI-16.
22.
Mancini DM, Eisen H, Kussmaul W, Mull R, Edmunds Jr.
LH, Wilson JR. Value of peak exercise oxygen consumption for
optimal timing of cardiac transplantation in ambulatory patients with
heart failure. Circulation. 1991;83:778-786.
23. Saxon LA, Stevenson WG, Middlekauff HR, Fonarow G, Woo M, Moser D, Stevenson LW. Predicting death from progressive heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:62-65.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:293-302.[Abstract]
25.
Packer M, Bristow MR, Cohn JN, Colucci WS, Fowler MB,
Gilbert EM, Shusterman NH. The effect of carvedilol on morbidity
and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1349-1355.
26.
Ayanian JZ, Hauptman PJ, Guadagnoli E, Antman EM,
Pashos CL, McNeil BJ. Knowledge and practices of generalist and
specialist physicians regarding drug therapy for acute myocardial
infarction. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1136-1142.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  F.D. R. Hobbs, A. K. Roalfe, R. C. Davis, M. K. Davies, R. Hare, and and the Midlands Research Practices Consortium (Mi Prognosis of all-cause heart failure and borderline left ventricular systolic dysfunction: 5 year mortality follow-up of the Echocardiographic Heart of England Screening Study (ECHOES) Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2007; 28(9): 1128 - 1134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J Grange The role of nurses in the management of heart failure Heart, May 1, 2005; 91(suppl_2): ii39 - ii42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Jain, P. Mills, L. M. Nunn, J. Butler, L. Luddington, V. Ross, P. Cliffe, K. Ranjadayalan, and A. D. Timmis Success of a multidisciplinary heart failure clinic for initiation and up-titration of key therapeutic agents Eur J Heart Fail, March 16, 2005; 7(3): 405 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. M. Koelling, M. L. Johnson, R. J. Cody, and K. D. Aaronson Discharge Education Improves Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure Circulation, January 18, 2005; 111(2): 179 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. C. Fonarow Heart Failure Disease Management Programs: Not a Class Effect Circulation, December 7, 2004; 110(23): 3506 - 3508. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. D. Galbreath, R. A. Krasuski, B. Smith, K. C. Stajduhar, M. D. Kwan, R. Ellis, and G. L. Freeman Long-Term Healthcare and Cost Outcomes of Disease Management in a Large, Randomized, Community-Based Population With Heart Failure Circulation, December 7, 2004; 110(23): 3518 - 3526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Capomolla, G. Pinna, M. T. La Rovere, R. Maestri, M. Ceresa, M. Ferrari, O. Febo, A. Caporotondi, G. Guazzotti, F. Lenta, et al. Heart failure case disease management program: a pilot study of home telemonitoring versus usual care Eur. Heart J. Suppl., November 1, 2004; 6(suppl_F): F91 - F98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. B. Adamson, A. L. Smith, W. T. Abraham, K. J. Kleckner, R. W. Stadler, A. Shih, M. M. Rhodes, and on behalf of the InSync III Model 8042 and Attain Continuous Autonomic Assessment in Patients With Symptomatic Heart Failure: Prognostic Value of Heart Rate Variability Measured by an Implanted Cardiac Resynchronization Device Circulation, October 19, 2004; 110(16): 2389 - 2394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. B. Adamson, W. T. Abraham, C. Love, and D. Reynolds The evolving challenge of chronic heart failure management: A call for a new curriculum for training heart failure specialists J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 6, 2004; 44(7): 1354 - 1357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Gonseth, P. Guallar-Castillon, J. R. Banegas, and F. Rodriguez-Artalejo The effectiveness of disease management programmes in reducing hospital re-admission in older patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published reports Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2004; 25(18): 1570 - 1595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Gustafsson and J. M. O. Arnold Heart failure clinics and outpatient management: review of the evidence and call for quality assurance Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2004; 25(18): 1596 - 1604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. De Geest, L. Scheurweghs, I. Reynders, W. Pelemans, W. Droogne, J. Van Cleemput, M. Leventhal, and J. Vanhaecke Differences in psychosocial and behavioral profiles between heart failure patients admitted to cardiology and geriatric wards Eur J Heart Fail, August 1, 2003; 5(4): 557 - 567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Capomolla, O. Febo, M. Ceresa, A. Caporotondi, G. Guazzotti, M. T. La Rovere, M. Ferrari, F. Lenta, S. Baldin, C. Vaccarini, et al. Cost/utility ratio in chronic heart failure: comparison between heart failure management program delivered by day-hospital and usual care J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 2, 2002; 40(7): 1259 - 1266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Azevedo, J. Pimenta, P. Dias, P. Bettencourt, A. Ferreira, and M. Cerqueira-Gomes Effect of a heart failure clinic on survival and hospital readmission in patients discharged from acute hospital care Eur J Heart Fail, June 1, 2002; 4(3): 353 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Nohria, E. Lewis, and L. W. Stevenson Medical Management of Advanced Heart Failure JAMA, February 6, 2002; 287(5): 628 - 640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Pinamonti, A. Perkan, A. Di Lenarda, D. Gregori, and G. Sinagra Dobutamine echocardiography in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: clinical and prognostic implications Eur J Heart Fail, January 1, 2002; 4(1): 49 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Grigioni, V. Carinci, L. Favero, L. B. Reggiani, G. Magnani, L. Potena, A. Barbieri, C. Magelli, A. Branzi, and B. Magnani Hospitalization for congestive heart failure: is it still a cardiology business? Eur J Heart Fail, January 1, 2002; 4(1): 99 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. J. Whellan, L. Gaulden, W. A. Gattis, B. Granger, S. D. Russell, M. A. Blazing, M. S. Cuffe, and C. M. O'Connor The Benefit of Implementing a Heart Failure Disease Management Program Arch Intern Med, October 8, 2001; 161(18): 2223 - 2228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. P. Holst, D. Kaye, M. Richardson, H. Krum, D. Prior, A. Aggarwal, R. Wolfe, and P. Bergin Improved outcomes from a comprehensive management system for heart failure Eur J Heart Fail, October 1, 2001; 3(5): 619 - 625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. McDonald, M. Ledwidge, J. Cahill, J. Kelly, P. Quigley, B. Maurer, F. Begley, M. Ryder, B. Travers, L. Timmons, et al. Elimination of early rehospitalization in a randomized, controlled trial of multidisciplinary care in a high-risk, elderly heart failure population: the potential contributions of specialist care, clinical stability and optimal angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor dose at discharge Eur J Heart Fail, March 1, 2001; 3(2): 209 - 215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. C. Atkinson and K. Branum Home-Based Disease Management in Congestive Heart Failure Home Health Care Management Practice, February 1, 2001; 13(2): 106 - 113. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. L. Grady, K. Dracup, G. Kennedy, D. K. Moser, M. Piano, L. W. Stevenson, and J. B. Young Team Management of Patients With Heart Failure : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Cardiovascular Nursing Council of the American Heart Association Circulation, November 7, 2000; 102(19): 2443 - 2456. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.D. Horowitz Home-based intervention: the next step in treatment of chronic heart failure? Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2000; 21(22): 1807 - 1809. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. M. Krumholz, D. W. Baker, C. M. Ashton, S. B. Dunbar, G. C. Friesinger, E. P. Havranek, M. A. Hlatky, M. Konstam, D. L. Ordin, I. L. Pina, et al. Evaluating Quality of Care for Patients With Heart Failure Circulation, March 28, 2000; 101 (12): e122 - e140. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. A. Gattis, V. Hasselblad, D. J. Whellan, and C. M. O'Connor Reduction in Heart Failure Events by the Addition of a Clinical Pharmacist to the Heart Failure Management Team: Results of the Pharmacist in Heart Failure Assessment Recommendation and Monitoring (PHARM) Study Arch Intern Med, September 13, 1999; 159(16): 1939 - 1945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. J M BROADLEY and A. J MARSHALL Self administration of metolazone reduces readmissions with decompensated congestive cardiac failure Heart, September 1, 1999; 82(3): 397a - 397. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. W. Stevenson Tailored therapy to hemodynamic goals for advanced heart failure Eur J Heart Fail, August 31, 1999; 1(3): 251 - 257. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. F. Philbin, H. F. C. Weil, T. A. Erb, and P. L. Jenkins Cardiology or Primary Care for Heart Failure in the Community Setting: Process of Care and Clinical Outcomes Chest, August 1, 1999; 116(2): 346 - 354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Ni, D. Nauman, D. Burgess, K. Wise, K. Crispell, and R. E. Hershberger Factors Influencing Knowledge of and Adherence to Self-care Among Patients With Heart Failure Arch Intern Med, July 26, 1999; 159(14): 1613 - 1619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Di Lenarda, G. Sabbadini, L. Salvatore, G. Sinagra, L. Mestroni, B. Pinamonti, D. Gregori, F. Ciani, A. Muzzi, S. Klugmann, et al. Long-term effects of carvedilol in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy with persistent left ventricular dysfunction despite chronic metoprolol J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 1999; 33(7): 1926 - 1934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. I BURGESS; and T. K KHONG The use of statins following AMI Postgrad. Med. J., June 1, 1999; 75(884): 382a - 382. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Jaarsma, R. Halfens, H. Huijer Abu-Saad, K. Dracup, T. Gorgels, J. van Ree, and J. Stappers Effects of education and support on self-care and resource utilization in patients with heart failure Eur. Heart J., May 1, 1999; 20(9): 673 - 682. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. F. Philbin and T. G. DiSalvo Prediction of hospital readmission for heart failure: development of a simple risk score based on administrative data J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 1999; 33(6): 1560 - 1566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. H. Taylor, D. J. Whellan, and F. A. Sloan Effects of Admission to a Teaching Hospital on the Cost and Quality of Care for Medicare Beneficiaries N. Engl. J. Med., January 28, 1999; 340(4): 293 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. ERHARDT and C. CLINE Heart failure clinics: a possible means of improving care Heart, November 1, 1998; 80(5): 428 - 429. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J J V MCMURRAY and S STEWART Nurse led, multidisciplinary intervention in chronic heart failure Heart, November 1, 1998; 80(5): 430 - 431. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 HEART FAILURE PROGRAMS IMPROVE OUTCOMES, SAVE COSTS Journal Watch (General), November 21, 1997; 1997(1121): 3 - 3. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. T. Abraham and M. R. Bristow Specialized Centers for Heart Failure Management Circulation, November 4, 1997; 96(9): 2755 - 2757. [Full Text]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||