| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 1997;96:2520-2525.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Division of Preventive Medicine (J.M.G., C.H.H., J.E.B.) and the Cardiovascular Division (J.M.G.), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention (J.E.B., C.H.H.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Department of Epidemiology (C.H.H., J.E.B.), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass; Department of Medicine (J.M.G.), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Brockton/West Roxbury, Mass; Laboratory of Biochemical Genetics and Metabolism (J.L.B.), Rockefeller University, New York, NY; and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (C.J.O.), Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, Mass.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results We examined the interrelationships of fasting triglycerides, other lipid parameters, and nonlipid risk factors with risk of myocardial infarction among 340 cases and an equal number of age-, sex-, and community-matched control subjects. Cases were men or women of <76 years of age with no prior history of coronary disease who were discharged from one of six Boston area hospitals with the diagnosis of a confirmed myocardial infarction. In crude analyses, we observed a significant association of elevated fasting triglycerides with risk of myocardial infarction (relative risk [RR] in the highest compared with the lowest quartile=6.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]=3.8 to 12.1; P for trend <.001). Results were not materially altered after control for nonlipid coronary risk factors. As expected, the relationship was attenuated after adjustment for HDL but remained statistically significant (RR in the highest quartile=2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.4 to 5.5; P for trend=.016). Furthermore, the ratio of triglycerides to HDL was a strong predictor of myocardial infarction (RR in the highest compared with the lowest quartile=16.0; 95% CI=7.7 to 33.1; P for trend <.001).
Conclusions Our data indicate that fasting triglycerides, as a marker for triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, may provide valuable information about the atherogenic potential of the lipoprotein profile, particularly when considered in context of HDL levels.
Key Words: triglycerides lipoproteins infarction coronary disease
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite extensive research over the past few decades, it remains unclear whether plasma TG, as a marker for the TG-rich lipoproteins, have independent value in predicting risk of cardiovascular disease. A recent National Institutes of Health consensus conference concluded that the data to support a judgment of a causal relationship of elevated TG with cardiovascular disease are "mixed."6 Most case-control and prospective cohort studies that have examined the relationship of fasting TG on risk of cardiovascular disease have reported strong crude associations.7 8 There appear to be complex metabolic relationships between cholesterol esterand triglyceride-rich lipoproteins1 9 and control for other lipid parameters can substantially attenuate the TG association.7 8 9 In particular, control for HDL cholesterol, which is inversely correlated with TG, tends to substantially attenuate the association of TG with CHD.10
As previously outlined by Austin et al8 and Crique et al,11 the assessment of any relationship of TG with risks of cardiovascular disease is complicated by several methodological issues. First, there is considerable within-individual variability in measured TG levels.12 Second, the distribution of TG levels in the population is not normal.13 Third, TG are strongly correlated with other lipid parameters.14 15 Fourth, there are complex metabolic relationships between the TG- and cholesterol esterrich lipoproteins that may interact to increase risks of cardiovascular disease.1 9 16 In an attempt to better understand the complex interactions of TG- and cholesterol esterrich lipoproteins, we examined the interrelationships of the fasting TG level, other lipid parameters, and nonlipid risk factors with risk of MI in a study of 340 cases and an equal number of control subjects matched on age, sex, and neighborhood of residence.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For each case, a control subject was chosen at random from the list of residents of the town in which the patient lived. Specifically, the name of the patient was located in the appropriate residence list of the town in which the case patient lived, and the next resident listed of the same sex and age (within 5 years) with a listed telephone number was selected as a control. Potentially eligible subjects were sent letters of invitation and then contacted by telephone. Of the eligible subjects contacted, 84% of cases and 60% of control subjects were enrolled, yielding a total of 340 case-control pairs.
All cases and control subjects were interviewed in their homes. Case
patients were interviewed
8 weeks after their MI. Information was
collected on a wide variety of potential coronary risk factors
related to the time period before the MI for the case patients and
before the interview for the control subjects. This information
included age, sex, hypertension (defined as reported treatment for
hypertension), diabetes mellitus, cigarette smoking, body mass index,
family history of premature (<60 years of age) MI, dietary intake,
psychological indicators, socioeconomic status, level of physical
activity, and alcohol consumption. Information on diet and alcohol
consumption was gathered using a semiquantitative food-frequency
questionnaire.19 20 Psychological indicators were measured
using 18 questions from the Framingham Heart Study (10 assessing type A
behavior, 7 assessing anger, and 1 regarding the number of promotions
gained over the past 10 years).21 Information on
socioeconomic status included usual occupation and highest educational
level attained.
Fasting venous blood samples were obtained and analyzed for lipids. Venous blood was drawn into 0.1% EDTA, and plasma was obtained by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 30 minutes at 4°C. Fresh plasma was used to determine TG level, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, VLDL cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol using Lipid Research Clinics methods.22 23 Cholesterol determinations were standardized by the Lipid Standardization Program of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga. Lipid determinations were made on a total of 605 subjects (306 cases and 299 control subjects) who provided an adequate venous blood sample. HDL subfractions were determined on fresh unfrozen plasma by the dextran sulfate method of Gidez on a subsample of 558 subjects (283 cases and 275 control subjects).24
Matched pair and crude unmatched relative risks were calculated.25 Because these were virtually identical, we judged that the matching could safely be disregarded and thereafter performed unmatched analyses. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to estimate relative risks while simultaneously controlling for a number of coronary risk factors.26 Tests for trend were conducted using logistic regression. Logistic regression models were compared using the likelihood ratio test. Because of the skewed nature of the raw TG distribution, we normalized the variable by taking the natural log of TG (logTG). Parallel models were run using both raw TG and logTG when TG were added to multivariate models as a continuous variable. To examine the interrelationships between fasting TG and other lipoprotein levels, total cholesterol, LDL, VLDL, HDL, HDL2, and HDL3 cholesterol were added to the risk factor model with TG one at a time. In addition, we used stepwise logistic regression to determine which lipid parameters, including ratios of total cholesterol, LDL, and TG to HDL, had the greatest predictive value. Relative risks were calculated for those in the second, third, and fourth quartiles of TG level and of the ratio of triglyceride to HDL compared with those in the first. Because of prior reports of a stronger association of TG with CHD27 28 among women compared with men, separate analyses stratified by sex were conducted.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Age- and sex-adjusted levels of other plasma lipid
parameters by quartile of TG level among control subjects
are presented in Table 3
. There
were strong positive associations of TG with total
cholesterol and VLDL cholesterol level as well
as strong inverse associations of TG with HDL level and both of its
subfractions, although the association appeared to be stronger for
HDL2 compared with that for HDL3. There also
was a weak association with LDL cholesterol level. Mean LDL
particle diameter was inversely related to TG levels.
|
The relative risk of MI among those in the higher compared to those in
the lowest quartile of TG are presented in Table 4
. Age- and sex-adjusted relative risks
in the second, third, and fourth quartiles were 3.2, 4.5, and 6.8,
respectively (P for trend <.001). Adjustment for available
coronary risk factors did not materially alter the results. As
expected, adjustment for HDL attenuated the relative risks, although
they remained significantly elevated in each of the higher categories
(P for trend=.016). The attenuation was more
pronounced in the highest quartile. Further adjustment for LDL did not
materially alter the results.
|
Based on prior reports that the interrelationship of
triglyceride-rich apoprotein C-IIIcontaining lipoprotein
particles (largely VLDL) and cholesterol esterrich
apoprotein C-IIIcontaining particles (largely HDL) predicts
angiographic progression of
atherosclerosis,2 29 we defined a ratio
that likely captures similar information: TG level (which roughly
approximates VLDL) divided by HDL (TG/HDL). TG levels were log
transformed to normalize distribution. Data on the risk of MI by
quartile of TG/HDL are presented in Table 5
. Compared with those in the lowest,
those in the highest quartile had a 16.0-fold increased risk of MI
(95% CI=7.7 to 33.1; P for trend across quartiles <.001)
after multivariate adjustment. Stepwise logistic
regression was also used to assess the predictive value of the TG/HDL
ratio compared with LDL/HDL (previously the strongest lipid predictor
of risk of MI in this data set) and total
cholesterol/HDL. Although all three remained highly
significant independent predictors, triglyceride/HDL
entered first (data not shown).
|
LDL subclass was previously determined in a subset of 197 of the 680 cases and control subjects (101 cases and 96 control subjects) in the current study.30 Compared with those with pattern A subjects (predominance of large buoyant LDL), pattern B subjects (predominance of small dense LDL) had significantly higher TG (232.0 versus 124.7 mg/dL; P<.0001) and lower HDL (32.3 versus 43.4 mg/dL; P<.001) levels. There was a 3.3-fold (95% CI=1.6 to 6.8) increased risk of MI among those with pattern B; however, this relationship was substantially attenuated after control for TG (RR=1.9; 95% CI=0.8 to 4.5) and HDL (RR=2.1; 95% CI=1.0 to 4.8).
There were apparent quantitative although not qualitative differences in the relationship of TG and HDL by sex. The association of TG with risk of MI appeared to be stronger for women than men, although the association of HDL appeared to be stronger for men than women. For men, there was a 2.6-fold (95% CI=1.7 to 3.9)increased risk of MI for each unit change in logTG after multivariate adjustment compared with 4.5-fold (95% CI=1.7 to 12.1) for women. However, there were no apparent sex differences in the association of TG/HDL with risk of MI (data not shown). There were no qualitative differences in the predictive value of TG or TG/HDL among those with high compared with low LDL cholesterol.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although fasting TG generally represent a strong predictor of CHD after control for nonlipid factors, adjustment for other lipid parameters substantially attenuates the association. Control for total cholesterol attenuates the relationship to nonsignificance in some but not all prior studies; however, adjustment for total cholesterol may not be appropriate.9 11 A proportion of the total cholesterol will be carried by TG-rich VLDL particles. Therefore, adjustment for total cholesterol may represent overadjustment. Similarly, adjustment for the TG-rich VLDL levels would not be appropriate. Adjustment for HDL substantially attenuates the association of TG with risk of CHD,7 8 9 10 11 consistent with our findings. Although there is significant attenuation after control for HDL cholesterol, our data suggest that fasting TG remain an independent predictor of MI even after control for HDL.
The attenuation of the TG effect after control for HDL cholesterol may be due to true confounding or more likely is the result of metabolic interactions. Recent data suggest that there are complex metabolic interrelationships between the TG- and cholesterol esterrich lipoproteins.1 2 31 The relationship of TG levels with other lipid parameters is likely to be metabolic in nature. TG levels are elevated in the setting of decreased lipoprotein lipase activity. This leads to higher chylomicron remnant and VLDL levels (both of which may be atherogenic) and lower HDL levels (which clearly promote atherogenesis). Thus, the ratio of TG/HDL may be a valuable marker for abnormal TG metabolism. In addition, lower lipoprotein lipase activity could prolong circulation time of VLDL and may result in increased density of VLDL particles. The subclass patterns of LDL may be dependent in part on VLDL density. A predominance of small dense LDL particles (LDL subclass pattern B), which appear to be more atherogenic, is strongly associated with elevated TG levels and lower HDL levels. Smaller LDL diameter may be the result of smaller more dense VLDL precursors resulting from abnormal TG metabolism. This possible mechanistic explanation of the current findings remains somewhat speculative and warrants further basic and epidemiological investigation.
Ratios of cholesterol esterrich lipoprotein levels (total cholesterol/HDL and LDL/HDL) are well-established predictors of CHD,6 32 and a high ratio may be a good indicator of abnormal cholesterol metabolism. In the Physicians' Health Study, a 1-unit increase in the LDL/HDL ratio was associated with a 53% increase in risk of MI.32 Similarly, in our study both ratios were strong independent predictors with a 1-unit increase in the TC/HDL and LDL/HDL associated with 49% and 75% increases in risk of MI, respectively. Our data suggest that TG/HDL ratio may be an important, albeit crude, marker of abnormal TG metabolism, which may provide valuable additional information about the atherogenic potential of a lipid profile. Although there may be some quantitative sex differences in the relationship of TG and HDL with risk of MI, there are no apparent sex differences for the relationship the TG/HDL with risk of MI.
Several limitations should be considered in the interpretation of these
results. First, results are based on a single measurement of fasting
lipids. The considerable within-individual variability in TG
measurements would result in substantial regression dilution bias,
which would tend to underestimate any true association between elevated
TG and MI. Second, only survivors of MI were included in this study
because of the need to assess adequately risk factor information on a
large number of lifestyle variables as well as to allow transient
lipoprotein alterations to return to normal before plasma samples are
obtained. The result of this process is likely to underestimate the
impact of many coronary risk factors due to the selection of
the healthiest patients of MI. Third, the timing of the blood drawing
could affect lipid levels because MI is known to acutely affect lipid
metabolism. For this reason, we used blood specimens
collected
10 weeks after hospital discharge, rather than those drawn
in-hospital. Several interventions after MI may have altered lipid
levels, including dietary modifications, exercise, and treatment for
elevated cholesterol. Thus confounding by intervention
after MI cannot be ruled out. The overall impact of these interventions
would likely have resulted in only modest changes in TG and HDL levels
among cases. Risk factor modifications, in general, could lower or
raise TG and HDL levels. We could not control for drug treatment after
MI because only limited information on medication use after the MI was
available. However, adjustment for prior treatment for elevated
cholesterol, as well as ß-blocker and thiazide use, did
not materially alter the results. Furthermore, our findings are
consistent with those reported in previous prospective studies.
Finally, this study was underpowered to detect modest differences in
effect between men and women given the fact that only 32% of the study
population was female. Furthermore, the sample was composed primarily
of white participants; therefore, generalizability to minorities may be
limited.
In conclusion, although imprecision in TG measurements, within-individual variability, and complex interactions between TG and lipoprotein levels may obscure the impact of TG in the development of CHD, our data indicate that elevated fasting TG represent a useful marker for risk of CHD, particularly when HDL levels are considered. The strong association of the ratio of TG/HDL with risk of CHD suggests a metabolic interaction between the TG- and cholesterol esterrich lipoproteins in increasing risk of MI, although further basic and epidemiological studies are warranted to explore mechanistic explanations for these findings. Although other laboratory measures, such as chylomicron remnants and LDL subclass, may provide additional information about the atherogenicity of the lipoprotein profile beyond the standard lipoprotein profile, a simple TG measure may provide a great deal of information in this regard. If these findings are confirmed in other studies, trials testing interventional strategies specifically designed to correct abnormalities in TG metabolism may be warranted. Ultimately, screening and treatment guidelines may require modification to allow greater attention to be paid to fasting TG levels.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received January 8, 1997; revision received May 5, 1997; accepted May 19, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Miller, C. P. Cannon, S. A. Murphy, J. Qin, K. K. Ray, E. Braunwald, and for the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 Investigators Impact of Triglyceride Levels Beyond Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol After Acute Coronary Syndrome in the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 Trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 19, 2008; 51(7): 724 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Fernandez and D. Webb The LDL to HDL Cholesterol Ratio as a Valuable Tool to Evaluate Coronary Heart Disease Risk J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2008; 27(1): 1 - 5. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-J. Zhang, K. E. Bird, T. S. McMillen, R. C. LeBoeuf, T. M. Hagen, and B. Frei Dietary {alpha}-Lipoic Acid Supplementation Inhibits Atherosclerotic Lesion Development in Apolipoprotein E Deficient and Apolipoprotein E/Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor Deficient Mice Circulation, January 22, 2008; 117(3): 421 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bansal, J. E. Buring, N. Rifai, S. Mora, F. M. Sacks, and P. M Ridker Fasting Compared With Nonfasting Triglycerides and Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Women JAMA, July 18, 2007; 298(3): 309 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Jenkins, C. W. Kendall, D. A Faulkner, T. Nguyen, T. Kemp, A. Marchie, J. M. Wong, R. de Souza, A. Emam, E. Vidgen, et al. Assessment of the longer-term effects of a dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods in hypercholesterolemia Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2006; 83(3): 582 - 591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Koh, S. H. Han, M.-S. Shin, J. Y. Ahn, Y. Lee, and E. K. Shin Significant differential effects of lower doses of hormone therapy or tibolone on markers of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2005; 26(14): 1362 - 1368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Dokras, M. Bochner, E. Hollinrake, S. Markham, B. VanVoorhis, and D. H. Jagasia Screening Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome for Metabolic Syndrome Obstet. Gynecol., July 1, 2005; 106(1): 131 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Karelis, M. Faraj, J.-P. Bastard, D. H. St-Pierre, M. Brochu, D. Prud'homme, and R. Rabasa-Lhoret The Metabolically Healthy but Obese Individual Presents a Favorable Inflammation Profile J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2005; 90(7): 4145 - 4150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Reaven The Metabolic Syndrome: Requiescat in Pace Clin. Chem., June 1, 2005; 51(6): 931 - 938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B Siripaitoon, M Osiri, V Vongthavaravat, S Akkasilpa, and U Deesomchok The prevalence of dyslipoproteinemia in Thai patients with systemic lupus erythematosus Lupus, December 1, 2004; 13(12): 961 - 968. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Brehm, G. Pfeiler, G. Pacini, H. Vierhapper, and M. Roden Relationship between Serum Lipoprotein Ratios and Insulin Resistance in Obesity Clin. Chem., December 1, 2004; 50(12): 2316 - 2322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Asia Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration Serum Triglycerides as a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Diseases in the Asia-Pacific Region Circulation, October 26, 2004; 110(17): 2678 - 2686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Dobiasova Atherogenic Index of Plasma [Log(Triglycerides/HDL-Cholesterol)]: Theoretical and Practical Implications Clin. Chem., July 1, 2004; 50(7): 1113 - 1115. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Tan, D. Johns, and N. B. Glazer Pioglitazone Reduces Atherogenic Index of Plasma in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Clin. Chem., July 1, 2004; 50(7): 1184 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D Stark and B. J Holub Differential eicosapentaenoic acid elevations and altered cardiovascular disease risk factor responses after supplementation with docosahexaenoic acid in postmenopausal women receiving and not receiving hormone replacement therapy Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2004; 79(5): 765 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Djousse, S. C Hunt, D. K Arnett, M. A Province, J. H Eckfeldt, and R C. Ellison Dietary linolenic acid is inversely associated with plasma triacylglycerol: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2003; 78(6): 1098 - 1102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. McLaughlin, F. Abbasi, K. Cheal, J. Chu, C. Lamendola, and G. Reaven Use of Metabolic Markers To Identify Overweight Individuals Who Are Insulin Resistant Ann Intern Med, November 18, 2003; 139(10): 802 - 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Koh, J. Y. Ahn, D. K. Jin, B.-K. Yoon, H. S. Kim, D. S. Kim, W. C. Kang, S. H. Han, I. S. Choi, and E. K. Shin Significant Differential Effects of Hormone Therapy or Tibolone on Markers of Cardiovascular Disease in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2003; 23(10): 1889 - 1894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Johansson, L. Wilhelmsen, G. Lappas, and A. Rosengren High lipid levels and coronary disease in women in Goteborg--outcome and secular trends: a prospective 19 year follow-up in the BEDAstudy Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2003; 24(8): 704 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. T. Bloomgarden American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Consensus Conference on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome: 25-26 August 2002, Washington, DC Diabetes Care, April 1, 2003; 26(4): 1297 - 1303. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Reaven Importance of Identifying the Overweight Patient Who Will Benefit the Most by Losing Weight Ann Intern Med, March 4, 2003; 138(5): 420 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Laidlaw and B. J Holub Effects of supplementation with fish oil-derived n-3 fatty acids and {gamma}-linolenic acid on circulating plasma lipids and fatty acid profiles in women Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2003; 77(1): 37 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Reaven Metabolic Syndrome: Pathophysiology and Implications for Management of Cardiovascular Disease Circulation, July 16, 2002; 106(3): 286 - 288. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Corella, M. Guillen, C. Saiz, O. Portoles, A. Sabater, J. Folch, and J. M. Ordovas Associations of LPL and APOC3 gene polymorphisms on plasma lipids in a Mediterranean population: interaction with tobacco smoking and the APOE locus J. Lipid Res., March 1, 2002; 43(3): 416 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E Roeters van Lennep, H.T. Westerveld, D.W. Erkelens, and E. E van der Wall Risk factors for coronary heart disease: implications of gender Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2002; 53(3): 538 - 549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Dewailly, C. Blanchet, S. Lemieux, L. Sauve, S. Gingras, P. Ayotte, and B. J. Holub n-3 Fatty acids and cardiovascular disease risk factors among the Inuit of Nunavik Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2001; 74(4): 464 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Haidar, S. Mott, B. Boucher, C. Y. Lee, M. Marcil, and J. Genest , Jr. Cellular cholesterol efflux is modulated by phospholipid-derived signaling molecules in familial HDL deficiency/Tangier disease fibroblasts J. Lipid Res., February 1, 2001; 42(2): 249 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. P. Kastelein, J. W. Jukema, A. H. Zwinderman, S. Clee, A. J. van Boven, H. Jansen, T. J. Rabelink, R. J. G. Peters, K. I. Lie, G. Liu, et al. Lipoprotein Lipase Activity Is Associated With Severity of Angina Pectoris Circulation, October 3, 2000; 102(14): 1629 - 1633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||