Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1997;96:2520-2525

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaziano, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Buring, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaziano, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Buring, J. E.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CHOLESTEROL
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Attack

(Circulation. 1997;96:2520-2525.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Fasting Triglycerides, High-Density Lipoprotein, and Risk of Myocardial Infarction

J. Michael Gaziano, MD, MPH; Charles H. Hennekens, MD, DrPH; Christopher J. O'Donnell, MD, MPH; Jan L. Breslow, MD; ; Julie E. Buring, ScD

From the Division of Preventive Medicine (J.M.G., C.H.H., J.E.B.) and the Cardiovascular Division (J.M.G.), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention (J.E.B., C.H.H.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Department of Epidemiology (C.H.H., J.E.B.), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass; Department of Medicine (J.M.G.), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Brockton/West Roxbury, Mass; Laboratory of Biochemical Genetics and Metabolism (J.L.B.), Rockefeller University, New York, NY; and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (C.J.O.), Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, Mass.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background Recent data suggest that triglyceride-rich lipoproteins may play a role in atherogenesis. However, whether triglycerides, as a marker for these lipoproteins, represent an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease remains unclear, despite extensive research. Several methodological issues have limited the interpretability of the existing data.

Methods and Results We examined the interrelationships of fasting triglycerides, other lipid parameters, and nonlipid risk factors with risk of myocardial infarction among 340 cases and an equal number of age-, sex-, and community-matched control subjects. Cases were men or women of <76 years of age with no prior history of coronary disease who were discharged from one of six Boston area hospitals with the diagnosis of a confirmed myocardial infarction. In crude analyses, we observed a significant association of elevated fasting triglycerides with risk of myocardial infarction (relative risk [RR] in the highest compared with the lowest quartile=6.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]=3.8 to 12.1; P for trend <.001). Results were not materially altered after control for nonlipid coronary risk factors. As expected, the relationship was attenuated after adjustment for HDL but remained statistically significant (RR in the highest quartile=2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.4 to 5.5; P for trend=.016). Furthermore, the ratio of triglycerides to HDL was a strong predictor of myocardial infarction (RR in the highest compared with the lowest quartile=16.0; 95% CI=7.7 to 33.1; P for trend <.001).

Conclusions Our data indicate that fasting triglycerides, as a marker for triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, may provide valuable information about the atherogenic potential of the lipoprotein profile, particularly when considered in context of HDL levels.


Key Words: triglycerides • lipoproteins • infarction • coronary disease


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Over the past four decades since serum cholesterol levels were first linked to atherosclerotic disease, a number of additional markers have been identified in an attempt to better characterize the atherogenic potential of the lipid profile. Relationships of cholesterol ester–rich lipoproteins (LDL and HDL) with atherosclerosis have been clearly established. Recent data suggest that TG-rich lipoproteins (chylomicrons, chylomicron remnants, and VLDL) may also play a role in atherogenesis.1 2 3 4 5

Despite extensive research over the past few decades, it remains unclear whether plasma TG, as a marker for the TG-rich lipoproteins, have independent value in predicting risk of cardiovascular disease. A recent National Institutes of Health consensus conference concluded that the data to support a judgment of a causal relationship of elevated TG with cardiovascular disease are "mixed."6 Most case-control and prospective cohort studies that have examined the relationship of fasting TG on risk of cardiovascular disease have reported strong crude associations.7 8 There appear to be complex metabolic relationships between cholesterol ester–and triglyceride-rich lipoproteins1 9 and control for other lipid parameters can substantially attenuate the TG association.7 8 9 In particular, control for HDL cholesterol, which is inversely correlated with TG, tends to substantially attenuate the association of TG with CHD.10

As previously outlined by Austin et al8 and Crique et al,11 the assessment of any relationship of TG with risks of cardiovascular disease is complicated by several methodological issues. First, there is considerable within-individual variability in measured TG levels.12 Second, the distribution of TG levels in the population is not normal.13 Third, TG are strongly correlated with other lipid parameters.14 15 Fourth, there are complex metabolic relationships between the TG- and cholesterol ester–rich lipoproteins that may interact to increase risks of cardiovascular disease.1 9 16 In an attempt to better understand the complex interactions of TG- and cholesterol ester–rich lipoproteins, we examined the interrelationships of the fasting TG level, other lipid parameters, and nonlipid risk factors with risk of MI in a study of 340 cases and an equal number of control subjects matched on age, sex, and neighborhood of residence.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The methods of the Boston Area Health Study have been previously described.17 18 Briefly, we reviewed all admissions between January 1, 1982, and December 31, 1983, to the coronary care and other intensive care units of six suburban Boston hospitals (Emerson, Framingham Union, Leonard Morse, Mount Auburn, Newton-Wellesley, and Waltham-Weston) to identify eligible cases. Those eligible for inclusion were white men or women <76 years of age who lived in the Boston area and had no history of previous MI or angina pectoris, in whom symptoms of MI had begun within 24 hours of admission. Patients with the diagnosis of confirmed MI, based on clinical history, who had an increase in creatine kinase and were discharged alive were enrolled in the study if they were willing and able to participate and if informed consent could be obtained from the patient and the admitting physician. The research protocol was approved by institutional human subjects committees of all participating hospitals.

For each case, a control subject was chosen at random from the list of residents of the town in which the patient lived. Specifically, the name of the patient was located in the appropriate residence list of the town in which the case patient lived, and the next resident listed of the same sex and age (within 5 years) with a listed telephone number was selected as a control. Potentially eligible subjects were sent letters of invitation and then contacted by telephone. Of the eligible subjects contacted, 84% of cases and 60% of control subjects were enrolled, yielding a total of 340 case-control pairs.

All cases and control subjects were interviewed in their homes. Case patients were interviewed {approx}8 weeks after their MI. Information was collected on a wide variety of potential coronary risk factors related to the time period before the MI for the case patients and before the interview for the control subjects. This information included age, sex, hypertension (defined as reported treatment for hypertension), diabetes mellitus, cigarette smoking, body mass index, family history of premature (<60 years of age) MI, dietary intake, psychological indicators, socioeconomic status, level of physical activity, and alcohol consumption. Information on diet and alcohol consumption was gathered using a semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire.19 20 Psychological indicators were measured using 18 questions from the Framingham Heart Study (10 assessing type A behavior, 7 assessing anger, and 1 regarding the number of promotions gained over the past 10 years).21 Information on socioeconomic status included usual occupation and highest educational level attained.

Fasting venous blood samples were obtained and analyzed for lipids. Venous blood was drawn into 0.1% EDTA, and plasma was obtained by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 30 minutes at 4°C. Fresh plasma was used to determine TG level, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, VLDL cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol using Lipid Research Clinics methods.22 23 Cholesterol determinations were standardized by the Lipid Standardization Program of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga. Lipid determinations were made on a total of 605 subjects (306 cases and 299 control subjects) who provided an adequate venous blood sample. HDL subfractions were determined on fresh unfrozen plasma by the dextran sulfate method of Gidez on a subsample of 558 subjects (283 cases and 275 control subjects).24

Matched pair and crude unmatched relative risks were calculated.25 Because these were virtually identical, we judged that the matching could safely be disregarded and thereafter performed unmatched analyses. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to estimate relative risks while simultaneously controlling for a number of coronary risk factors.26 Tests for trend were conducted using logistic regression. Logistic regression models were compared using the likelihood ratio test. Because of the skewed nature of the raw TG distribution, we normalized the variable by taking the natural log of TG (logTG). Parallel models were run using both raw TG and logTG when TG were added to multivariate models as a continuous variable. To examine the interrelationships between fasting TG and other lipoprotein levels, total cholesterol, LDL, VLDL, HDL, HDL2, and HDL3 cholesterol were added to the risk factor model with TG one at a time. In addition, we used stepwise logistic regression to determine which lipid parameters, including ratios of total cholesterol, LDL, and TG to HDL, had the greatest predictive value. Relative risks were calculated for those in the second, third, and fourth quartiles of TG level and of the ratio of triglyceride to HDL compared with those in the first. Because of prior reports of a stronger association of TG with CHD27 28 among women compared with men, separate analyses stratified by sex were conducted.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Baseline characteristics of cases and control subjects are presented in Table 1Down. As expected, major coronary risk factors were more prevalent among cases than control subjects. Coronary risk factors by each quartile of TG level among control subjects are presented in Table 2Down. Those in the higher TG categories were more likely to be male, have hypertension, have diabetes mellitus, and have higher body mass index. In addition, they tended to be more active and consume more alcohol.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of Cases and Controls


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Coronary Risk Factors by Quartile of Triglyceride Level Among Controls

Age- and sex-adjusted levels of other plasma lipid parameters by quartile of TG level among control subjects are presented in Table 3Down. There were strong positive associations of TG with total cholesterol and VLDL cholesterol level as well as strong inverse associations of TG with HDL level and both of its subfractions, although the association appeared to be stronger for HDL2 compared with that for HDL3. There also was a weak association with LDL cholesterol level. Mean LDL particle diameter was inversely related to TG levels.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Age- and Sex-Adjusted Mean Plasma Lipid Level by Quartile of Triglyceride Level Among Controls

The relative risk of MI among those in the higher compared to those in the lowest quartile of TG are presented in Table 4Down. Age- and sex-adjusted relative risks in the second, third, and fourth quartiles were 3.2, 4.5, and 6.8, respectively (P for trend <.001). Adjustment for available coronary risk factors did not materially alter the results. As expected, adjustment for HDL attenuated the relative risks, although they remained significantly elevated in each of the higher categories (P for trend=.016). The attenuation was more pronounced in the highest quartile. Further adjustment for LDL did not materially alter the results.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Relative Risk of Myocardial Infarction by Quartile of Triglyceride Level

Based on prior reports that the interrelationship of triglyceride-rich apoprotein C-III–containing lipoprotein particles (largely VLDL) and cholesterol ester–rich apoprotein C-III–containing particles (largely HDL) predicts angiographic progression of atherosclerosis,2 29 we defined a ratio that likely captures similar information: TG level (which roughly approximates VLDL) divided by HDL (TG/HDL). TG levels were log transformed to normalize distribution. Data on the risk of MI by quartile of TG/HDL are presented in Table 5Down. Compared with those in the lowest, those in the highest quartile had a 16.0-fold increased risk of MI (95% CI=7.7 to 33.1; P for trend across quartiles <.001) after multivariate adjustment. Stepwise logistic regression was also used to assess the predictive value of the TG/HDL ratio compared with LDL/HDL (previously the strongest lipid predictor of risk of MI in this data set) and total cholesterol/HDL. Although all three remained highly significant independent predictors, triglyceride/HDL entered first (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Relative Risk of Myocardial Infarction Quartile of Log Triglyceride Level/HDL level

LDL subclass was previously determined in a subset of 197 of the 680 cases and control subjects (101 cases and 96 control subjects) in the current study.30 Compared with those with pattern A subjects (predominance of large buoyant LDL), pattern B subjects (predominance of small dense LDL) had significantly higher TG (232.0 versus 124.7 mg/dL; P<.0001) and lower HDL (32.3 versus 43.4 mg/dL; P<.001) levels. There was a 3.3-fold (95% CI=1.6 to 6.8) increased risk of MI among those with pattern B; however, this relationship was substantially attenuated after control for TG (RR=1.9; 95% CI=0.8 to 4.5) and HDL (RR=2.1; 95% CI=1.0 to 4.8).

There were apparent quantitative although not qualitative differences in the relationship of TG and HDL by sex. The association of TG with risk of MI appeared to be stronger for women than men, although the association of HDL appeared to be stronger for men than women. For men, there was a 2.6-fold (95% CI=1.7 to 3.9)–increased risk of MI for each unit change in logTG after multivariate adjustment compared with 4.5-fold (95% CI=1.7 to 12.1) for women. However, there were no apparent sex differences in the association of TG/HDL with risk of MI (data not shown). There were no qualitative differences in the predictive value of TG or TG/HDL among those with high compared with low LDL cholesterol.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Our data are consistent with earlier reports that elevated fasting TG levels are strongly associated with risk of MI.10 Although elevated TG were associated with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, physical activity, increased alcohol intake and male sex, adjustment for these and other nonlipid risk factors did not materially alter the crude estimates.

Although fasting TG generally represent a strong predictor of CHD after control for nonlipid factors, adjustment for other lipid parameters substantially attenuates the association. Control for total cholesterol attenuates the relationship to nonsignificance in some but not all prior studies; however, adjustment for total cholesterol may not be appropriate.9 11 A proportion of the total cholesterol will be carried by TG-rich VLDL particles. Therefore, adjustment for total cholesterol may represent overadjustment. Similarly, adjustment for the TG-rich VLDL levels would not be appropriate. Adjustment for HDL substantially attenuates the association of TG with risk of CHD,7 8 9 10 11 consistent with our findings. Although there is significant attenuation after control for HDL cholesterol, our data suggest that fasting TG remain an independent predictor of MI even after control for HDL.

The attenuation of the TG effect after control for HDL cholesterol may be due to true confounding or more likely is the result of metabolic interactions. Recent data suggest that there are complex metabolic interrelationships between the TG- and cholesterol ester–rich lipoproteins.1 2 31 The relationship of TG levels with other lipid parameters is likely to be metabolic in nature. TG levels are elevated in the setting of decreased lipoprotein lipase activity. This leads to higher chylomicron remnant and VLDL levels (both of which may be atherogenic) and lower HDL levels (which clearly promote atherogenesis). Thus, the ratio of TG/HDL may be a valuable marker for abnormal TG metabolism. In addition, lower lipoprotein lipase activity could prolong circulation time of VLDL and may result in increased density of VLDL particles. The subclass patterns of LDL may be dependent in part on VLDL density. A predominance of small dense LDL particles (LDL subclass pattern B), which appear to be more atherogenic, is strongly associated with elevated TG levels and lower HDL levels. Smaller LDL diameter may be the result of smaller more dense VLDL precursors resulting from abnormal TG metabolism. This possible mechanistic explanation of the current findings remains somewhat speculative and warrants further basic and epidemiological investigation.

Ratios of cholesterol ester–rich lipoprotein levels (total cholesterol/HDL and LDL/HDL) are well-established predictors of CHD,6 32 and a high ratio may be a good indicator of abnormal cholesterol metabolism. In the Physicians' Health Study, a 1-unit increase in the LDL/HDL ratio was associated with a 53% increase in risk of MI.32 Similarly, in our study both ratios were strong independent predictors with a 1-unit increase in the TC/HDL and LDL/HDL associated with 49% and 75% increases in risk of MI, respectively. Our data suggest that TG/HDL ratio may be an important, albeit crude, marker of abnormal TG metabolism, which may provide valuable additional information about the atherogenic potential of a lipid profile. Although there may be some quantitative sex differences in the relationship of TG and HDL with risk of MI, there are no apparent sex differences for the relationship the TG/HDL with risk of MI.

Several limitations should be considered in the interpretation of these results. First, results are based on a single measurement of fasting lipids. The considerable within-individual variability in TG measurements would result in substantial regression dilution bias, which would tend to underestimate any true association between elevated TG and MI. Second, only survivors of MI were included in this study because of the need to assess adequately risk factor information on a large number of lifestyle variables as well as to allow transient lipoprotein alterations to return to normal before plasma samples are obtained. The result of this process is likely to underestimate the impact of many coronary risk factors due to the selection of the healthiest patients of MI. Third, the timing of the blood drawing could affect lipid levels because MI is known to acutely affect lipid metabolism. For this reason, we used blood specimens collected {approx}10 weeks after hospital discharge, rather than those drawn in-hospital. Several interventions after MI may have altered lipid levels, including dietary modifications, exercise, and treatment for elevated cholesterol. Thus confounding by intervention after MI cannot be ruled out. The overall impact of these interventions would likely have resulted in only modest changes in TG and HDL levels among cases. Risk factor modifications, in general, could lower or raise TG and HDL levels. We could not control for drug treatment after MI because only limited information on medication use after the MI was available. However, adjustment for prior treatment for elevated cholesterol, as well as ß-blocker and thiazide use, did not materially alter the results. Furthermore, our findings are consistent with those reported in previous prospective studies. Finally, this study was underpowered to detect modest differences in effect between men and women given the fact that only 32% of the study population was female. Furthermore, the sample was composed primarily of white participants; therefore, generalizability to minorities may be limited.

In conclusion, although imprecision in TG measurements, within-individual variability, and complex interactions between TG and lipoprotein levels may obscure the impact of TG in the development of CHD, our data indicate that elevated fasting TG represent a useful marker for risk of CHD, particularly when HDL levels are considered. The strong association of the ratio of TG/HDL with risk of CHD suggests a metabolic interaction between the TG- and cholesterol ester–rich lipoproteins in increasing risk of MI, although further basic and epidemiological studies are warranted to explore mechanistic explanations for these findings. Although other laboratory measures, such as chylomicron remnants and LDL subclass, may provide additional information about the atherogenicity of the lipoprotein profile beyond the standard lipoprotein profile, a simple TG measure may provide a great deal of information in this regard. If these findings are confirmed in other studies, trials testing interventional strategies specifically designed to correct abnormalities in TG metabolism may be warranted. Ultimately, screening and treatment guidelines may require modification to allow greater attention to be paid to fasting TG levels.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
CHD = coronary heart disease
CI = confidence interval
MI = myocardial infarction
RR = relative risk
TG = triglycerides


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by research grants HL-24423 and HL-21006 and institutional training grant HL-07575 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md. We would like to thank the six Boston-area hospitals that participated in this study: Emerson Hospital (Marvin H. Kendrick, MD), Framingham Union Hospital (Marvin Adner, MD, and Gerald Evans, MD), Leonard Morse Hospital (L. Frederick Kaplan, MD), Mount Auburn Hospital (Leonard Zir, MD), Newton-Wellesley Hospital (James Sidd, MD), and Waltham-Weston Hospital (Solomon Gabbay, MD). We would like to thank Anne T. Cadigan for help in preparation of this manuscript and Marty Van Denburgh for his computer expertise.


*    Footnotes
 
Reprint requests to Dr J. Michael Gaziano, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 900 Commonwealth Ave E, Boston MA 02215-1204.

Received January 8, 1997; revision received May 5, 1997; accepted May 19, 1997.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Gotto AM. Interrelationship of triglycerides with lipoproteins and High-density lipoproteins. Am J Cardiol. 1990;66:20A–23A.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Hodis HN, Mack WJ, Azen SP, Alaupovic P, Pagoda JM, Labree L, Hemphill LC, Kramsch DM, Blankenhorn DH. Triglyceride- and cholesterol-rich lipoproteins have a differential effect on mild/moderate and severe lesion progression as assessed by quantitative coronary angiography in a controlled trial of lovastatin. Circulation. 1994;90:42-49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Hodis HN, Mock WJ. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and progression of coronary artery disease. Curr Opin Lipid. 1995;6:209-214.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Bissett JK, Wyeth RP, Matts JP, Johnson JW, the POSCH Group. Plasma lipid concentrations and subsequent coronary occlusion after a first myocardial infarction. Am J Med Sci. 1993;305:139-144.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Krauss RM, Williams PT, Brensike J, Detre KM, Lindgren FT, Kelsey SF, Vranizan K, Levy RI. Intermediate-density lipoproteins and progression of coronary artery disease in hypercholesterolemic men. Lancet. 1987;62-66.
  6. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Triglyceride, High-Density Lipoprotein, and Coronary Heart Disease. NIH Consensus Conference: Triglyceride, High-Density Lipoprotein, and Coronary Heart Disease. JAMA. 1993;269:505-510.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Hulley SB, Roseman RH, Bawol RD, Brand RJ. Epidemiology as a guide to clinical decisions: the association between triglyceride and coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1980;302:1383-1389.[Abstract]
  8. Austin MA. Plasma triglyceride as a risk factor for coronary artery disease: the epidemiologic evidence and beyond. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129:249-259.[Free Full Text]
  9. Reaven GM. Are triglycerides important as a risk factor for coronary disease? Heart Dis Stroke. 1993;2:44-48.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Hokanson JE, Austin MA. Plasma triglyceride level is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease independent of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level: a meta-analysis of population-based prospective studies. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1996;3:213-219.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Crique MH, Heiss G, Cohn R, Cowan LD, Suchindran CM, Bangdiwala S, Kritchevsky S, Jacobs DR, O'Grady HK, Davis CE. Plasma triglyceride level and mortality from coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1220-1225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Jacobs DR, Barrett-Connor E. Retest reliability of plasma cholesterol and triglyceride: the Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1982;116:878-885.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Cowan LD, Wilcosky T, Crique MH, Barrett-Conner E, Suchindran CM, Wallace R, Laskarzewski P, Walden C. Demographic, behavioral, biochemical, and dietary correlates of plasma triglycerides: the Lipid Research Clinics Program Prevalence Study. Arteriosclerosis. 1985;5:466-480.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Albrink MJ, Krauss RM, Lindgren FT, Von der Groeben J, Pan S, Wood PD. Intercorrelations among plasma high density lipoprotein, obesity, and triglycerides in a normal population. Lipids. 1980;140:668-676.
  15. Davis CE, Gordon D, LaRosa J, Wood PD, Halperin M. Correlations of plasma high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with other plasma lipid and lipoprotein concentrations. Circulation. 1980;62(suppl IV):IV-24-IV-30.
  16. West KM, Ahuja MMS, Bennett PH, Czyzyk A, DeAcosta OM, Fuller JH, Grab B, Grabauskas V, Jarrett RJ, Kosaka K, Keen H, Kroleski AS, Miki E, Schliack, Teuscher A, Watkins PJ, Stober JA. The role of circulating glucose and triglyceride concentrations and their interactions with other `risk factors' as determinants of arterial disease in nine diabetic population samples from the WHO multinational study. Diabetes Care. 1983;15:15-19.[Abstract]
  17. Buring JE, O'Connor GT, Goldhaber SZ, Rosner B, Herbert PN, Blum CB, Breslow JL, Hennekens CH. Decreased HDL2 and HDL3 cholesterol, apo A-I and apo-II, and increased risk of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1992;85:22-29.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Gaziano JM, Buring JE, Breslow JL, Goldhaber SZ, Rosner B, VanDenburgh M, Willett W, Hennekens CH. Moderate alcohol intake, increased levels of high-density lipoprotein and its subfractions, and risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993:329:1829-1834.
  19. Willett WC, Sampson L, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Bain C, Witschi J, Hennekens CH, Speizer FE. Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;122:51-65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Giovannucci E, Colditz G, Stampfer MJ, Rimm ER, Littin L, Sampson L, Willett WC. The assessment of alcohol consumption by a single self administered questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;133:810-817.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Haynes SG, Levin S, Scotch N, Feinleib M, Kannel WB. The relationship of psychosocial factors to coronary heart disease in the Framingham Study, I: methods and risk factors. Am J Epidemiol. 1978;107:362-383.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lipid Research Clinics Program. Lipid Research Clinics Population Studies Data Book. Vol 1. The Prevalence Study. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health; 1980:28-81, NIH publication No. 80-1527.
  23. Lipid Research Clinics Program. Manual of Operations. Vol. 1. Lipid and Lipoprotein Analysis. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 1975:51-59, DHEW publication No. 75-628.
  24. Gidez LI, Liller GO, Burstein M, Slagle S, Elder HA. Separation and quantification of subclasses of human plasma high density lipoprotein by a simple precipitation procedure. J Lipid Res. 1982;23:1206-1223.[Abstract]
  25. Schlesselman JJ. Case-Control Studies. New York, NJ: Oxford University Press, 1982.
  26. Cornfield J, Gordon T, Smith WW. Quantal response curves for experimentally uncontrolled variables. Bull Intern Stat. 1961;38:97-115.
  27. Heyden S, Heiss G, Hames G, Bartel AG. Fasting triglycerides as predictors of total and CHD mortality in Evans County, Georgia. J Chronic Dis. 1980;33:275-282.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Castelli WP. The triglyceride issue: a view from Framingham. Am Heart J. 1986;112:432-437.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Blankenhorn DH, Alaupovic P, Wickham E, Chin HP, Azen SP. Prediction of angiographic change in native human coronary arteries and aortocoronary bypass grafts: lipid and non-lipid factors. Circulation. 1990;81:470-476.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Austin MA, Breslow JL, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Willett WC, Krauss RM. Low-density lipoprotein patterns and risk of myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1988;260:1917-1922.[Abstract]
  31. Eisenberg S, Gavish D, Oschury Y, Fainaru M, Deckelbaum RJ. Abnormalities in very low, low, and high density lipoproteins in hypertriglyceridemia: reversal toward normal with bezafibrate treatment. J Clin Invest. 1984;74:470-482.
  32. Stampfer MJ, Sacks FM, Salvini S, Willett WC, Hennekens CH. A prospective study of cholesterol apolipoproteins and the risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:373-381.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Miller, C. P. Cannon, S. A. Murphy, J. Qin, K. K. Ray, E. Braunwald, and for the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 Investigators
Impact of Triglyceride Levels Beyond Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol After Acute Coronary Syndrome in the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 Trial.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 19, 2008; 51(7): 724 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
M. L. Fernandez and D. Webb
The LDL to HDL Cholesterol Ratio as a Valuable Tool to Evaluate Coronary Heart Disease Risk
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2008; 27(1): 1 - 5.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
W.-J. Zhang, K. E. Bird, T. S. McMillen, R. C. LeBoeuf, T. M. Hagen, and B. Frei
Dietary {alpha}-Lipoic Acid Supplementation Inhibits Atherosclerotic Lesion Development in Apolipoprotein E Deficient and Apolipoprotein E/Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor Deficient Mice
Circulation, January 22, 2008; 117(3): 421 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. Bansal, J. E. Buring, N. Rifai, S. Mora, F. M. Sacks, and P. M Ridker
Fasting Compared With Nonfasting Triglycerides and Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Women
JAMA, July 18, 2007; 298(3): 309 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
D. J. Jenkins, C. W. Kendall, D. A Faulkner, T. Nguyen, T. Kemp, A. Marchie, J. M. Wong, R. de Souza, A. Emam, E. Vidgen, et al.
Assessment of the longer-term effects of a dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods in hypercholesterolemia
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2006; 83(3): 582 - 591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
K. K. Koh, S. H. Han, M.-S. Shin, J. Y. Ahn, Y. Lee, and E. K. Shin
Significant differential effects of lower doses of hormone therapy or tibolone on markers of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study
Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2005; 26(14): 1362 - 1368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
A. Dokras, M. Bochner, E. Hollinrake, S. Markham, B. VanVoorhis, and D. H. Jagasia
Screening Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome for Metabolic Syndrome
Obstet. Gynecol., July 1, 2005; 106(1): 131 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. D. Karelis, M. Faraj, J.-P. Bastard, D. H. St-Pierre, M. Brochu, D. Prud'homme, and R. Rabasa-Lhoret
The Metabolically Healthy but Obese Individual Presents a Favorable Inflammation Profile
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2005; 90(7): 4145 - 4150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
G. M. Reaven
The Metabolic Syndrome: Requiescat in Pace
Clin. Chem., June 1, 2005; 51(6): 931 - 938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
B Siripaitoon, M Osiri, V Vongthavaravat, S Akkasilpa, and U Deesomchok
The prevalence of dyslipoproteinemia in Thai patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
Lupus, December 1, 2004; 13(12): 961 - 968.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. Brehm, G. Pfeiler, G. Pacini, H. Vierhapper, and M. Roden
Relationship between Serum Lipoprotein Ratios and Insulin Resistance in Obesity
Clin. Chem., December 1, 2004; 50(12): 2316 - 2322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Asia Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration
Serum Triglycerides as a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Diseases in the Asia-Pacific Region
Circulation, October 26, 2004; 110(17): 2678 - 2686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. Dobiasova
Atherogenic Index of Plasma [Log(Triglycerides/HDL-Cholesterol)]: Theoretical and Practical Implications
Clin. Chem., July 1, 2004; 50(7): 1113 - 1115.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. H. Tan, D. Johns, and N. B. Glazer
Pioglitazone Reduces Atherogenic Index of Plasma in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
Clin. Chem., July 1, 2004; 50(7): 1184 - 1188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
K. D Stark and B. J Holub
Differential eicosapentaenoic acid elevations and altered cardiovascular disease risk factor responses after supplementation with docosahexaenoic acid in postmenopausal women receiving and not receiving hormone replacement therapy
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2004; 79(5): 765 - 773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
L. Djousse, S. C Hunt, D. K Arnett, M. A Province, J. H Eckfeldt, and R C. Ellison
Dietary linolenic acid is inversely associated with plasma triacylglycerol: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2003; 78(6): 1098 - 1102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
T. McLaughlin, F. Abbasi, K. Cheal, J. Chu, C. Lamendola, and G. Reaven
Use of Metabolic Markers To Identify Overweight Individuals Who Are Insulin Resistant
Ann Intern Med, November 18, 2003; 139(10): 802 - 809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
K. K. Koh, J. Y. Ahn, D. K. Jin, B.-K. Yoon, H. S. Kim, D. S. Kim, W. C. Kang, S. H. Han, I. S. Choi, and E. K. Shin
Significant Differential Effects of Hormone Therapy or Tibolone on Markers of Cardiovascular Disease in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2003; 23(10): 1889 - 1894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S. Johansson, L. Wilhelmsen, G. Lappas, and A. Rosengren
High lipid levels and coronary disease in women in Goteborg--outcome and secular trends: a prospective 19 year follow-up in the BEDAstudy
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2003; 24(8): 704 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
Z. T. Bloomgarden
American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Consensus Conference on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome: 25-26 August 2002, Washington, DC
Diabetes Care, April 1, 2003; 26(4): 1297 - 1303.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
G. M. Reaven
Importance of Identifying the Overweight Patient Who Will Benefit the Most by Losing Weight
Ann Intern Med, March 4, 2003; 138(5): 420 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. Laidlaw and B. J Holub
Effects of supplementation with fish oil-derived n-3 fatty acids and {gamma}-linolenic acid on circulating plasma lipids and fatty acid profiles in women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2003; 77(1): 37 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. Reaven
Metabolic Syndrome: Pathophysiology and Implications for Management of Cardiovascular Disease
Circulation, July 16, 2002; 106(3): 286 - 288.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
D. Corella, M. Guillen, C. Saiz, O. Portoles, A. Sabater, J. Folch, and J. M. Ordovas
Associations of LPL and APOC3 gene polymorphisms on plasma lipids in a Mediterranean population: interaction with tobacco smoking and the APOE locus
J. Lipid Res., March 1, 2002; 43(3): 416 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
J. E Roeters van Lennep, H.T. Westerveld, D.W. Erkelens, and E. E van der Wall
Risk factors for coronary heart disease: implications of gender
Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2002; 53(3): 538 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
E. Dewailly, C. Blanchet, S. Lemieux, L. Sauve, S. Gingras, P. Ayotte, and B. J. Holub
n-3 Fatty acids and cardiovascular disease risk factors among the Inuit of Nunavik
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2001; 74(4): 464 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
B. Haidar, S. Mott, B. Boucher, C. Y. Lee, M. Marcil, and J. Genest , Jr.
Cellular cholesterol efflux is modulated by phospholipid-derived signaling molecules in familial HDL deficiency/Tangier disease fibroblasts
J. Lipid Res., February 1, 2001; 42(2): 249 - 257.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. J. P. Kastelein, J. W. Jukema, A. H. Zwinderman, S. Clee, A. J. van Boven, H. Jansen, T. J. Rabelink, R. J. G. Peters, K. I. Lie, G. Liu, et al.
Lipoprotein Lipase Activity Is Associated With Severity of Angina Pectoris
Circulation, October 3, 2000; 102(14): 1629 - 1633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]