(Circulation. 1997;96:1970-1975.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Comparative Medicine Clinical Research Center and the Department of Comparative Medicine, Bowman Gray School of Medicine of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC. Dr Honoré's present address is Department of Medicine and Physiology, Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research, San Antonio, Tex.
Correspondence to J. Koudy Williams, DVM, Department of Comparative Medicine, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1040. E-mail kwilliams{at}cpm.bgsm.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Fifty ovariectomized cynomolgus monkeys were fed an atherogenic diet for 34 months. During this time, monkeys were assigned to one of three treatment groups: (1) control, no hormone replacement (n=15); (2) CEEs mixed in the diet at a dose of 0.043 mg · kg-1 · d-1 (n=14); or (3) tamoxifen mixed in the diet at a dose of 1.3 mg · kg-1 · d-1 (n=21). Quantitative angiography was used to measure coronary artery dilator responses to intracoronary infusions of acetylcholine (10-8, 10-7, and 10-6 mol/L) and nitroglycerin (15 µg/min). Coronary arteries of the tamoxifen-treated group constricted in response to high-dose acetylcholine (-5.4± 2.3%, P<.05 versus control), whereas those of the CEE group did not (P>.05 versus control). Conversely, arteries from the CEE group dilated in response to nitroglycerin (9.1±2.1%, P<.05 versus control), whereas those from the tamoxifen group did not (P>.05 versus control). Statistical adjustments for variations in plaque extent (determined subsequently after necropsy) and plasma lipoproteins did not alter the results.
Conclusions Tamoxifen has primarily estrogen-antagonistic effects on epicardial coronary artery dilator responses in atherosclerotic monkeys. Results implicate the estrogen receptor as a modulator of coronary artery dilator responses in ovariectomized, atherosclerotic monkeys.
Key Words: atherosclerosis arteries hormones tamoxifen vasculature
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cardiovascular disease remains the most common cause of death in postmenopausal women.6 Therefore, it is essential that the potential effect of tamoxifen therapy on cardiovascular disease risk factors be elucidated. Several studies of women with breast cancer have shown that tamoxifen has beneficial effects on plasma lipids and lipoproteins.7 8 9 10 11 However, the data are still inconclusive. A recent study of surgically postmenopausal female nonhuman primates showed no effect of tamoxifen on plasma cholesterol concentrations but significant reductions in arterial LDL degradation and in the progression of coronary artery atherosclerosis.12 Investigators also report that tamoxifen prevents LDL oxidation in postmenopausal women.13
One of the manifestations of coronary artery disease is an impairment of normal vasodilation.14 15 16 17 These alterations in endothelium-mediated vascular reactivity appear very early in the progression of atherosclerosis18 19 and may contribute to the pathogenesis of coronary vasospasm, angina, and myocardial infarction. Estrogen replacement therapy improves dilator responses of large epicardial coronary arteries among postmenopausal women20 21 22 23 and nonhuman primates.24 25 26 Whether tamoxifen has estrogen-agonist or estrogen-antagonist effects on coronary artery reactivity is undetermined.
In this study, we used a well-established nonhuman primate model of diet-induced atherosclerosis and surgical menopause to compare the vasodilator effects of tamoxifen with CEEs in atherosclerotic coronary arteries.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Blood samples for TPC,30 HDL-C,31 and triglycerides32 were taken from sedated monkeys (ketamine hydrochloride 10 mg/kg IM) at 3-month intervals for a concurrent study. Plasma concentrations of TPC and triglycerides reported here were taken after 27 months of treatment, because these have the most relevance to the condition of the animal at the time of coronary angiography. Plasma lipoprotein fractions (HDL, LDL, and IDL+VLDL) were obtained after 24 months of treatment (the last date of sampling).33 34
Animals were housed in 4- to 6-member social groups during the experiment. All experimental procedures were conducted in compliance with the "Principles of Laboratory Animal Care" and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Bowman Gray School of Medicine.
Measurement of Coronary Artery Vascular Responses
Monkeys were anesthetized with ketamine
hydrochloride (10 to 15 mg/kg IM) and butorphanol tartrate
(0.025 mg/kg IM). Doses of both agents were repeated as needed
to maintain light anesthesia. Anesthetized monkeys
were placed on a circulating-warm-water blanket pad and allowed to
breathe spontaneously. ECG monitoring (Aloka 118, Johnson and Johnson
Ultrasound) was performed throughout the period of
anesthesia. Heparin was administered at the start of
surgery (100 mg/kg IV). A custom-designed 3F (tapered to 1.8F)
catheter was inserted into the left femoral artery and advanced into
the left main coronary artery under fluoroscopic guidance. An
infusion pump (Harvard Apparatus) was used to make serial
2-minute infusions of (1) 5% dextrose in water (control 1); (2)
acetylcholine (10-8,
10-7, and 10-6
mol/L estimated final concentration in the coronary
artery); (3) 5% dextrose in water (control 2); and (4)
nitroglycerin (15 µg/min). It has been shown
previously that these doses of agonists, when infused into the
coronary artery, have minimal effects on blood pressure and
heart rate.24 25 Data were not used if heart rate was
significantly elevated or decreased (>20%) during infusion of the
agonist. Cineangiographic images were taken in the 30° right
anterior oblique projection at 60 frames per second immediately
after each infusion, during a hand injection of 2 mL of nonionic
contrast solution (Omnipaque, Squibb) into the left main
coronary artery.
The catheter was removed after the last infusion, and the monkey was allowed to recover from anesthesia. Postoperative care was provided in accordance with state and federal regulations.
Angiographic Measurements
QCA was done in the Bowman Gray Cardiology Image
Analysis Laboratory. A single frame after each infusion was
selected for analysis on the basis of clarity of the image of
the proximal 2 to 3 cm of the left circumflex coronary artery.
Criteria for clarity included maximal opacification, no overlapping
structures, and minimal motion artifact. Care was taken to select all
frames from a single monkey at the same time in the cardiac cycle (end
diastole). Each frame was optimally magnified with a
cine-video projector (SME-3500, Sony Corp of America) and digitized
to a 480x384x10-bit gray-scale image with a frame grabber (4
megabytes, Epix Inc) installed in a 486 personal computer. The mean
diameter of the segment of interest was measured by previously
validated QCA (QCA Plus, Sanders Data Systems). Specific anatomic
landmarks were used to ensure that the same portion of the vessel was
analyzed after each infusion. Each film was analyzed by
an operator who was unaware of the subject's treatment group. Although
each film was analyzed only once, previous QCA studies in our
laboratory have shown a high degree of correlation between two repeated
measurements of the same artery (r=.98). Each digitized
analysis was examined for accuracy of measurement by personnel
blinded to treatment groups. To further ensure accuracy and precision
of the QCA methods used, images of a Plexiglas phantom with five
precision-drilled holes ranging from 0.73 to 4.79 mm were obtained
under radiographic conditions similar to those for the
angiographic images. The correlation coefficient of these images was
0.99, with an SEM of 0.05 mm.
Measurement of Atherosclerotic Plaque Size
On completion of the angiographic studies, the monkeys were
transported immediately to the necropsy room, where sodium
pentobarbital (30 mg/kg IV) was administered to attain surgical
anesthesia. An infusion of Ringer's solution was initiated
via an 18-gauge needle inserted into the left ventricle. The monkeys
were then euthanized with an injection of sodium pentobarbital (80
mg/kg IV). A 1-cm longitudinal incision was made in the
abdominal vena cava for drainage of blood from the
cardiovascular system. The heart was removed and
perfusion-fixed for 1 hour at 100 mm Hg with 10% neutral
buffered formalin. The left circumflex coronary artery (the
artery measured angiographically) was cut en bloc at 5-mm intervals for
a total of five blocks. The tissue blocks were dehydrated through
increasing concentrations of ethanol and embedded in paraffin. Two
5-µm sections were cut from each block and stained with Verhoeffvan
Gieson's stain. The sections then were projected onto a digitizer
plate. The component parts of the artery were traced with a hand-held
stylus and computer-assisted digitizer. The intimal area was used as
the measurement of atherosclerosis extent and was
expressed as square millimeters.
Statistical Analysis
All values shown are mean±SEM unless otherwise stated. ANOVA
was used to compare body weight, lipoprotein concentrations, and
vascular reactivity to acetylcholine and nitroglycerin
between treatment groups. The percent change in coronary artery
diameter in response to each dose of acetylcholine or
nitroglycerin was calculated by comparison of
arterial diameter after each drug infusion with its
diameter during the preceding control infusion. Vascular reactivity
data also were analyzed by ANCOVA, with plaque size or plasma
lipid concentrations as the covariates. Differences were considered
statistically significant when P<.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
12 years) or body
weight (
3 kg) at the end of the experiment
(Table
|
Baseline TPC and HDL-C concentrations in groups of animals before
treatment were
11.0 and 1.4 mmol/L, respectively.
Treatment effects on plasma lipids and coronary vascular
reactivity are presented in the Table
. Treatment with CEEs or
tamoxifen increased plasma triglyceride concentrations and
reduced LDL molecular weight (P<.05, Table
). Tamoxifen
treatment had no effect on TPC, HDL, IDL+VLDL, or LDL compared with
control animals (P>.05, Table
).
Arteries from control animals and tamoxifen-treated animals constricted
in response to the two higher doses of acetylcholine, whereas arteries
from animals treated with CEEs dilated in response to all
concentrations of acetylcholine (P<.05, CEE versus control
or tamoxifen, Table
). Although plaque extent was less in the CEE group
(P<.05 versus control) and somewhat less (P=.57
versus control) in tamoxifen-treated monkeys (Table
), statistical
adjustments for variation in atherosclerotic plaque size or plasma
lipids had no influence on this outcome. The effect of treatment on
coronary vascular responses to the highest concentration of
acetylcholine (10-6 mol/L) is shown
graphically in the Figure
.
|
Arteries from animals in all groups dilated in response to
nitroglycerin, although the magnitude of response was
significantly higher in the CEE group (P<.05 versus control
and tamoxifen; Table
). The response to nitroglycerin of
the tamoxifen group was increased only marginally over that of the
control group (P=.08, Table
). Statistical adjustment for
variation in atherosclerotic plaque size or plasma lipids did not
affect these results.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Vascular Reactivity
The finding that CEEs improved large epicardial coronary
artery responses to acetylcholine is consistent with our
previous results.26 The current findings confirm that,
like short-term CEE treatment (1 month),26 longer
treatment (2 years) resulted in the amelioration of constrictor
responses of atherosclerotic coronary arteries to
acetylcholine. Interestingly, in the present study CEEs also
improved dilator responses to nitroglycerin, suggesting
that CEEs may have affected both endothelium- and
smooth musclemediated dilation of these atherosclerotic
coronary arteries. These results are consistent with
those of other studies, which suggest an effect of estrogens on
endothelium-independent rather than
endothelium-dependent dilation.36 37
Unfortunately, our data do not resolve the issue of whether estrogens
affect vascular reactivity through endothelium- or
smooth musclemediated mechanisms, but this study was not designed to
do so. It does seem, however, that both cell types may be affected,
resulting in overall improvement in coronary dilator
capability.
We report in this study that unlike estrogens, tamoxifen does not
improve epicardial coronary dilator responses to acetylcholine
(Figure
). Furthermore, tamoxifen does not improve dilator responses to
nitroglycerin (Table
). To our knowledge, this is the
first report of the effects of tamoxifen on epicardial coronary
artery reactivity in atherosclerotic subjects. Since tamoxifen is both
an estrogen receptor blocker and an estrogen agonist, our results
suggest that under these experimental conditions, tamoxifen acts as an
estrogen antagonist on the vessel wall. There is also the
suggestion that estrogen receptors (which are blocked by tamoxifen) may
play a role in the improved vascular reactivity reported with pure
estrogens. Estrogen receptors have been implicated previously as
important modulators of vascular physiological and
pathological events,38 39 40 41 although no studies to date have
directly examined the role of the estrogen receptor in modulating the
pathophysiological characteristics of the vessel
wall in vivo. Although suggestive, the results presented here
also do not directly implicate the estrogen receptor in modulating
vascular reactivity. Additional groups, such as a combined estrogen+
tamoxifen group, and careful examination of estrogen-receptor binding
and activity would be required to test that hypothesis. Such
measurements were beyond the scope of the present study. Use of
tamoxifen has been associated with increased hot flushes in women,
suggesting an effect of tamoxifen on small-artery reactivity. However,
the current experiment was not designed to examine resistance-size
vessel reactivity.
Animals in the CEE group showed a reduction in the amount of coronary artery atherosclerosis as well as an improvement in coronary vasodilation. This comparison might suggest that hormone effects on acetylcholine responses and extent of atherosclerosis may be related. We do not believe this to be the case, however. We have shown previously that the effects of estrogen (both CEEs and ethinyl estradiol) on vascular reactivity are independent of extent of atherosclerosis and plasma lipids.24 25 Furthermore, statistical adjustments for variation in extent of atherosclerosis did not alter the results. The lack of correlation between plaque size and vascular response is further emphasized in the tamoxifen-treated group, which showed a reduction in atherosclerosis progression but no improvement in dilator responses.
These data suggest that tamoxifen may act as both an estrogen agonist (ie, to inhibit atherogenesis) and an estrogen antagonist (ie, to inhibit dilator responses) in the same artery. Unfortunately, it was beyond the scope of this study to examine this apparent paradox. However, it could be speculated that the mechanisms by which estrogen agonists and antagonists modulate atherogenesis and vascular reactivity are different, with the classic estrogen receptor being a more important modulator of vascular reactivity.
It also seems unlikely that vascular reactivity was significantly related to treatment effects on plasma lipids or lipoproteins. Statistical adjustment for variations in LDL molecular weight and plasma triglycerides did not alter the results. Furthermore, short-term treatment with CEEs does not alter plasma lipoprotein concentrations but does affect vascular reactivity.26 Resistance of LDL to oxidation was not measured in this study but has been identified as a factor that may affect vascular reactivity.16
Tamoxifen and Coronary Heart Disease
It is estimated that several hundred thousand women in this
country take tamoxifen for treatment and/or prevention of estrogen
receptorpositive breast cancer.42 However, tamoxifen has
been reported to increase the risk of endometrial
cancer,43 44 45 suggesting that it has estrogenic activity in
some tissues. Since cardiovascular disease
represents a serious health threat to women, the impact of
tamoxifen on cardiovascular disease risk has been of
concern. The results of studies exploring the effects of tamoxifen on
coronary heart disease have been varied and are confounded in
large part by the fact that the studies have been done on women with
breast cancer.
Most of the current data from human and animal studies suggest that tamoxifen either has no deleterious effects or may even be protective against cardiovascular disease.7 8 9 10 11 This conclusion is based primarily on the association of tamoxifen with reductions in known risk factors such as plasma LDL concentrations and on the results of the Scottish trial of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy, which show a 67% reduced risk of myocardial infarction.5 Rutqvist and Mattson,46 for the Stockholm Breast Cancer Study Group, report a 32% reduction in risk of all cardiac disease. There is also evidence that tamoxifen may have antioxidant properties.13 In our study, tamoxifen had modest effects on plasma lipid concentrations. There was a trend toward lower TPC, higher HDL-C, and lower LDL-C concentrations, as well as lower LDL molecular weights, in the tamoxifen-treated animals.12 These results are roughly comparable to those reported in women7 8 9 10 11 and might have been amplified if more subjects had been included in each experimental group. However, our results in monkeys will not necessarily translate directly to those in women.
To summarize, tamoxifen appears to have both estrogenic (atherosclerosis extent, plasma lipids) and antiestrogenic (vascular reactivity) effects on the cardiovascular system in nonhuman primates. However, if one considers the results of all studies (both human and nonhuman primates), it appears that the net effect of tamoxifen is a lowering of the risk of cardiovascular disease, despite a lack of improvement in coronary vascular reactivity.
Experimental Considerations
Several experimental procedures must be considered in the
interpretation of these data. Acetylcholine and
nitroglycerin are test substances only, and any
alteration of dilation in response to either agent can be interpreted
only as an index of epicardial coronary artery function.
Acetylcholine stimulates the release of vasodilator substances from
normally functioning endothelial
cells.15 23 Disruption of the endothelium
causes acetylcholine to act directly on the smooth muscle cells,
resulting in vasoconstriction. Therefore, acetylcholine is widely used
as an indicator of endothelial function.
Coronary artery responses to acetylcholine are similar to those
reported in test subjects in response to normal daily stimuli such as
anxiety or exercise.23 Nitroglycerin
causes vasodilation by acting directly on smooth muscle cells and thus
is a good measure of endothelium-independent dilator
capacity. The control group of animals in this study did not show a
strong vasodilator response to nitroglycerin, but the
arteries did recover from constriction and returned to slightly greater
than their initial control diameter. The greatest degree of
vasodilation was seen in the CEE group. It is possible that the
arteries from animals in all other treatment groups, which had
constricted during the acetylcholine infusions, had not fully recovered
their ability to dilate.
The anesthetics used in this experiment (ketamine and butorphanol) were chosen because they are relatively short-lived and do not significantly reduce autonomic reflexes. We cannot rule out the possibility that these agents may have had anticholinergic actions; however, they did not increase heart rate.
We chose not to preconstrict arteries in this experiment. Rather, baseline (control) measurements were made before each drug infusion. Baseline diameters were similar among groups. Therefore, we believe that any effects of anesthesia on coronary artery diameter were similar among treatment groups.
The doses of CEEs and tamoxifen used were calculated to mimic the doses taken by women. A major assumption is that the monkeys received the correct dose and metabolized the drugs in a manner similar to women. Plasma samples were taken 4 hours after consumption of the drugs. Certainly, the plasma concentrations of these three compounds were similar to those of women taking these compounds. However, it cannot be ruled out that the overall kinetics of metabolism are different between species. It is unclear whether or to what extent different kinetics would alter the experimental results.
In female cynomolgus monkeys, diameters of the left circumflex coronary artery average 1 mm. This small diameter pushes the limits of QCA sensitivity. We have previously published26 data on the reproducibility and sensitivity of QCA in monkeys and believe that we can reliably measure the percent differences in diameter presented in this report. Furthermore, we cannot rule out that small changes in heart rate and blood pressure during infusion of agonist may have affected results.
A larger question is whether the modest percent changes in diameter are significant physiologically. In the context of risk of vasospasm, they probably are not. However, one could interpret these changes as a barometer of overall vascular (endothelial?) function. If so, there are numerous ways in which vascular function, especially as it relates to endothelial function, may contribute to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and plaque rupture.
Results of the present study indicate that, unlike estrogen, tamoxifen (a mixed estrogen agonist/antagonist) does not improve impaired dilator responses of large epicardial coronary arteries to acetylcholine in atherosclerotic primates. Therefore, under these conditions, tamoxifen has estrogen-antagonist properties. This contrasts with the estrogen-agonist effects of tamoxifen on atherogenesis. Thus, the effect of tamoxifen on vascular reactivity appears to be unrelated to its effects on atherogenesis and may suggest two modes of action (both agonist and antagonist) on the vessel wall. Although not conclusive, these data imply that the estrogen receptor may play a role in modulating the effect of estrogen agonists on vascular reactivity.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received July 15, 1996; revision received November 25, 1996; accepted December 16, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Bonadonna G, Valagussa P, Brambilla C, Moliterni A, Zambitti M, Ferrari LS. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancers with chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. Semin Oncol. 1991;18:515-524.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Powles TJ. The case for clinical trials of tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer. Lancet. 1992;340:1145-1147.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Fugh-Berman A, Epstein S. Tamoxifen: disease prevention or disease substitution? Lancet. 1992;340:1143-1145.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. McDonald CC, Stewart HJ. Fatal myocardial infarction in the Scottish adjuvant tamoxifen trial: the Scottish Breast Cancer Committee. Br Med J. 1993;303:435-437.
6.
Barrett-Connor E, Bush TL. Estrogen and
coronary heart disease in women. JAMA. 1991;265:1861-1867.
7. Rossner S, Wallgren A. Serum lipoproteins and proteins after breast cancer surgery and effects of tamoxifen. Atherosclerosis. 1984;53:339-346.
8. Bruning PF, Bonfrer JMG, Hart AAM, de Jong-Bakker M, Linders D, van Loon J, Nooyen WJ. Tamoxifen, serum lipoproteins and cardiovascular risk. Br J Cancer. 1988;58:497-499.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Love RR, Newcomb PA, Wiebe DA, Surawicz TS, Jordan VC,
Carbone PP, DeMets DL. Effects of tamoxifen therapy on lipid and
lipoprotein levels in postmenopausal patients with node-negative breast
cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990;82:1327-1332.
10.
Bagdade JD, Wolter J, Subbaiah PV, Ryan W.
Effects of tamoxifen treatment on plasma lipids and lipoprotein
composition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990;70:1132-1135.
11. Ingram D. Tamoxifen use, oestrogen binding and serum lipids of postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Austr N Z J Surg. 1990;60:673-675.
12.
Williams JK, Wagner JD, Li Z, Golden DL, Adams
MR. Tamoxifen inhibits arterial accumulation of LDL
degradation products and progression of coronary artery
atherosclerosis in monkeys. Arterioscler
Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:403-408.
13. Guetta V, Lush RM, Figg WD, Waclawiw MA, Cannon RO. Effects of the antiestrogen tamoxifen on low-density lipoprotein concentrations and oxidation in postmenopausal women. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:1072-1073.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Heistad DD, Armstrong ML, Marcus ML, Piegors DJ, Mark
AL. Augmented responses to vasoconstrictor stimuli in
hypercholesterolemic and atherosclerotic
monkeys. Circ Res. 1984;54:711-718.
15. Ludmer PL, Selwyn AP, Shook THL, Wayne RR, Mudge GH, Alexander RW, Ganz P. Paradoxical vasoconstriction induced by acetylcholine in atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:1046-1051.[Abstract]
16. Harrison DG, Freiman PC, Armstrong ML, Marcus ML, Heistad DD. Alterations of vascular reactivity in atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 1987;61(suppl II):II-74-II-80.
17.
Zeiher AM, Drexler H, Wollschläger H, Just
H. Modulation of coronary vasomotor tone in humans:
progressive endothelial dysfunction with different
early stages of atherosclerosis.
Circulation. 1991;83:391-401.
18.
Vita JA, Treasure CB, Nabel EG, McLenachan JM, Fish RD,
Yeung AC, Vekshtein VI, Selwyn AP, Ganz P. The coronary
vasomotor response to acetylcholine relates to risk factors for
coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1989;81:491-497.
19. Reddy KG, Nair R, Sheehan HM, Hodgson JM. Evidence that selective endothelial dysfunction may occur in the absence of angiographic or ultrasound atherosclerosis in patients with risk factors for atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:833-843.[Abstract]
20. Herrington DM, Braden GA, Downes TR, Williams JK. Estrogen modulates coronary vasomotor responses in postmenopausal women with early atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:951-952.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Gilligan DM, Badar DM, Panza JA, Quyyumi AA, Cannon RO
III. Acute vascular effects of estrogen in postmenopausal
women. Circulation. 1994;90:786-791.
22.
Gilligan DM, Quyyumi AA, Cannon RO III. Effects
of physiological levels of estrogen on
coronary vasomotor function in postmenopausal women.
Circulation. 1994;89:2545-2551.
23.
Reis SE, Gloth ST, Blumenthal RS, Resar JR, Zacur HA,
Gerstenblith G, Brinker JA. Ethinyl estradiol acutely
attenuates abnormal coronary vasomotor responses to
acetylcholine in postmenopausal women. Circulation. 1994;89:52-60.
24.
Williams JK, Adams MR, Klopfenstein HS. Estrogen
modulates responses of atherosclerotic coronary
arteries. Circulation. 1990;81:1680-1687.
25. Williams JK, Adams MR, Herrington DM, Clarkson TB. Short-term administration of estrogen and vascular responses of atherosclerotic coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:452-457.[Abstract]
26. Williams JK, Honoré EK, Washburn SA, Clarkson TB. Effects of hormone replacement therapy on reactivity of atherosclerotic coronary arteries in cynomolgus monkeys. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:1757-1761.[Abstract]
27.
Adams MR, Kaplan JR, Manuck SB, Koritnik DR, Parks JS,
Wolfe MS, Clarkson TB. Inhibition of coronary
atherosclerosis: lack of an effect of added
progesterone. Arteriosclerosis. 1990;10:1051-1057.
28. Adams MR, Clarkson TB, Koritnik DR, Nash HA. Contraceptive steroids and coronary artery atherosclerosis in cynomolgus monkeys. Fertil Steril. 1987;47:1010-1018.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Clarkson TB, Shively CA, Morgan TM, Koritnik DR, Adams MR, Kaplan JR. Oral contraceptives and coronary artery atherosclerosis of cynomolgus monkeys. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75:217-222.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Allain CC, Poon LS, Chan CSG, Richmond W, Fu PC. Enzymatic determination of total serum cholesterol. Clin Chem. 1974;20:470-475.[Abstract]
31. Lipid Research Clinics Program. Manual of Laboratory Operations: Lipid and Lipoprotein Analysis (revised 1982). Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health; 1984. US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare publication NIH 75-628.
32.
Fossati P, Principe L. Serum
triglycerides determined colorimetrically
with an enzyme that produces hydrogen peroxide. Clin
Chem. 1982;28:2077-2080.
33. Carroll RM, Rudel LL. Lipoprotein separations and low density lipoprotein molecular weight determination using high performance gel-filtration chromatography. J Lipid Res. 1983;24:200-207.[Abstract]
34. Auerbach BJ, Parks JS, Applebaum-Bowden D. A rapid and sensitive micro-assay for the enzymatic determination of plasma and lipoprotein cholesterol. J Lipid Res. 1990;31:738-742.[Abstract]
35.
Nayfield SG, Karp JE, Ford LG, Dorr FA, Kramer
BS. Potential role of tamoxifen in prevention of breast
cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991;83:1450-1459.
36.
Jiang C, Sarrel PM, Poole-Wilson PA, Collins P.
Acute effect of 17ß-estradiol on rabbit coronary artery
contractile responses to endothelin-1. Am J
Physiol. 1992;263:H271-H275.
37. Jiang C, Sarrel PM, Lindsay DC, Poole-Wilson PA, Collins P. Endothelium-independent relaxation of rabbit coronary artery by 17ß-oestradiol in vitro. Br J Pharmacol. 1991;104:1033-1037.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Fischer GM, Bashey RI, Rosenbaum H, Lyttle CR. A possible mechanism in arterial wall for mediation of sex difference in atherosclerosis. Exp Mol Pathol. 1985;43:288-296.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
McGill HC, Sheridan PJ. Nuclear uptake of sex
steroid hormones in the cardiovascular system of the
baboon. Circ Res. 1981;48:238-244.
40.
Lin AL, McGill HC, Shain SA. Hormone receptors
of the baboon cardiovascular system.
Arteriosclerosis. 1981;1:257-264.
41.
Losordo DW, Kearney M, Kim EA, Jekanowski J, Isner
JM. Variable expression of the estrogen receptor in normal
and atherosclerotic coronary arteries of premenopausal
women. Circulation. 1994;89:1501-1510.
42.
Prentice RL. Tamoxifen as a potential preventive
agent in healthy postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer
Inst. 1990;82:1310-1311.
43. Hardell L. Tamoxifen as a risk factor for carcinoma of corpus uteri. Lancet. 1988;2:563.
44. Malfetano JH. Tamoxifen-associated endometrial carcinoma in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol. 1990;39:82-84.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Atlante G, Pozzi M, Vincenzoni C, Vocaturo G. Four case reports presenting new acquisitions on the association between breast and endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1989;37:378-380.
46.
Rutqvist LE, Mattsson A, for the Stockholm Breast
Cancer Study Group. Cardiac and thromboembolic morbidity among
postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer in a randomized
trial of adjuvant tamoxifen. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:1398-1406.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Ouyang, E. D. Michos, and R. H. Karas Hormone Replacement Therapy and the Cardiovascular System: Lessons Learned and Unanswered Questions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 2, 2006; 47(9): 1741 - 1753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S Mikkola and T. B Clarkson Estrogen replacement therapy, atherosclerosis, and vascular function Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2002; 53(3): 605 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Dubey, S. Oparil, B. Imthurn, and E. K. Jackson Sex hormones and hypertension Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2002; 53(3): 688 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Campisi, L. Nathan, M. H. Pampaloni, H. Schoder, J. W. Sayre, G. Chaudhuri, and H. R. Schelbert Noninvasive Assessment of Coronary Microcirculatory Function in Postmenopausal Women and Effects of Short-Term and Long-Term Estrogen Administration Circulation, January 29, 2002; 105(4): 425 - 430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. N. Chan, R. J. MacAllister, H. M. Colhoun, P. Vallance, and A. D. Hingorani Changes in Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilatation and {{alpha}}-Adrenergic Responses in Resistance Vessels during the Menstrual Cycle in Healthy Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2001; 86(6): 2499 - 2504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Dubey and E. K. Jackson Estrogen-induced cardiorenal protection: potential cellular, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 2001; 280(3): F365 - F388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Reis, J. P. Costantino, D. L. Wickerham, E. Tan-Chiu, J. Wang, and M. Kavanah Cardiovascular Effects of Tamoxifen in Women With and Without Heart Disease: Breast Cancer Prevention Trial J Natl Cancer Inst, January 3, 2001; 93(1): 16 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Mendelsohn and R. H. Karas The Protective Effects of Estrogen on the Cardiovascular System N. Engl. J. Med., June 10, 1999; 340(23): 1801 - 1811. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Somjen, F. Kohen, A. Jaffe, Y. Amir-Zaltsman, E. Knoll, and N. Stern Effects of Gonadal Steroids and Their Antagonists on DNA Synthesis in Human Vascular Cells Hypertension, July 1, 1998; 32(1): 39 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |