Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1997;96:1461-1469

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmermund, A.
Right arrow Articles by Erbel, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmermund, A.
Right arrow Articles by Erbel, R.

(Circulation. 1997;96:1461-1469.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Coronary Artery Calcium in Acute Coronary Syndromes

A Comparative Study of Electron-Beam Computed Tomography, Coronary Angiography, and Intracoronary Ultrasound in Survivors of Acute Myocardial Infarction and Unstable Angina

Axel Schmermund, MD; Dietrich Baumgart, MD; Günter Görge, MD; Rainer Seibel, MD; Dietrich Grönemeyer, MD; Junbo Ge, MD; Michael Haude, MD; John Rumberger, MD, PhD; ; Raimund Erbel, MD

From the Department of Cardiology, University Clinic Essen (Germany) (A.S., D.B., G.G., J.G., M.H., R.E.); the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minn (A.S., J.R.); the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Witten/Herdecke, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany (R.S.); and the Institute for Development and Research of Microtechnology, University of Bochum (Germany) (D.G.).

Correspondence to Axel Schmermund, MD, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Cardiovascular Diseases, E 16-B Mayo, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail schmermund.axel{at}mayo.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background Quantification of coronary artery calcified plaques by electron-beam CT (EBCT) may predict cardiovascular events. However, whereas advanced coronary atherosclerotic plaques can be identified, mildly stenotic lipid-rich (soft) plaques may be difficult to detect. The value of EBCT in a subgroup of patients has therefore been questioned. To investigate this, we evaluated patients with acute coronary syndromes by EBCT and compared the results with coronary angiography and, in patients with an indeterminate angiogram, intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS).

Methods and Results EBCT was performed in 118 consecutive patients (57±11 years of age) with previous myocardial infarction (n=101) or unstable angina (n=17). A standard protocol requiring a CT density >130 Hounsfield units in an area >=1.03 mm2 was used for the definition of coronary artery calcium. We found that 110 patients had moderate to severe coronary artery disease by coronary angiography, and 8 had either mildly stenotic plaques at a single site (4 patients, confirmed by ICUS) or nonatherosclerotic causes of the unstable coronary syndrome (4 patients). One hundred and five of the 110 patients (96%) with moderate to severe angiographic disease but only 1 of the 8 other patients (13%) had a positive EBCT. Patients with acute coronary syndromes and negative EBCTs were significantly younger than patients with positive EBCTs (46±12 versus 58±10 years, P<.001), and a higher percentage was actively smoking (100% of the smokers versus 46%, P<.05).

Conclusions The vast majority of patients with acute coronary syndromes and at least moderate angiographic disease have identifiable coronary calcium by EBCT. Those patients with negative EBCTs have minimal or no atherosclerotic plaque formation. They are younger and tend to be active cigarette smokers.


Key Words: angina • calcium • coronary disease • imaging • myocardial infarction


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Coronary artery calcium is almost invariably associated with coronary atherosclerotic plaque formation.1 EBCT allows accurate quantification of coronary artery calcium2 3 and has therefore been investigated as a tool for noninvasive detection of CAD.4 5

Coronary artery calcium area has been demonstrated to be linearly related to histological plaque area and to quantify overall coronary plaque volume.6 The anatomic extent of angiographic disease is clearly an important determinant of prognosis.7 In most patients, a mixture of fibrous (presumably advanced, more mineralized, and stable) and lipid-rich (potentially unstable) plaques is observed.8 Thus, the more often the fibrous plaques are seen that can be detected by EBCT, the more often soft, vulnerable plaques may be associated.8 9 The prognostic value of EBCT calcium scanning in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects has been pointed out in two recently published studies.10 11 Specifically, subjects with little or no coronary artery calcium detected by EBCT were reported to have a very small chance of developing clinically manifest coronary syndromes over the course of 1 to 2 years compared with subjects with high calcium burdens.

Although unstable angina and MI usually result from extensive atherosclerotic disease, the individual lesions causing the event are often only mildly stenotic,12 and in some young survivors of MI, focal disease with a small overall coronary plaque burden can be observed.13 Yet only a certain "threshold" of atherosclerotic plaque volume seems to be associated with coronary artery calcium detected by EBCT.6 Endothelial dysfunction may contribute to lesion vulnerability even in early plaque formation, and oxidative stress induces an enhanced inflammatory response and monocyte infiltration that further renders lesions unstable.14 Additionally, arterial thrombosis and coronary spasm represent mechanisms not specifically linked to atherosclerosis that may nevertheless cause acute coronary syndromes.

Because of the above-noted points, a serious question has arisen as to the absence of coronary artery calcium in a subgroup of patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes.15 However, this has not been specifically examined. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the detection of calcified atherosclerotic plaques by EBCT in patients with acute coronary syndromes. We compared EBCT to coronary angiography in survivors of acute MI or unstable angina. ICUS was used to corroborate our findings in patients with indeterminate angiograms.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patients
Between April 1994 and August 1996, 118 consecutive patients (97 men, 21 women; mean age, 57±11 years), all of whom underwent coronary angiography, gave informed consent to undergo an EBCT examination for the assessment of coronary artery calcium. One hundred one patients had a previous index MI (84 men, 17 women; mean age, 57±11 years), and 17 patients had a previous first episode of unstable angina (13 men, 4 women; mean age, 55±10 years). Most of these patients were referred by their physicians or other medical centers for further diagnosis and/or treatment at the University Clinic Essen.

MI was diagnosed according to World Health Organization criteria.16 Q-wave MI was present in 72 of the 101 patients with MI (71%). Patients with coronary atherectomy, rotablation, stent implantation, or coronary artery bypass surgery before the EBCT examination were excluded from the study. For the purposes of this study, unstable angina was defined as definite angina at rest or new-onset angina within a week of presentation.17 In addition to the history and symptoms reported by the patient, documentation of ST-T changes in the ECG and a creatine kinase elevation less than twice the upper normal limit was obtained. In all patients, coronary angiography was performed for the clinical evaluation of CAD. In 13 patients with indeterminate angiograms, an additional ICUS examination was undertaken for further classification of the patient.18 EBCT scans were performed within 18 months (176±90 days) after the acute coronary syndrome.

Electron-Beam Computed Tomography
Nonenhanced EBCT scans were performed with an Evolution scanner (Siemens) in the high-resolution single-slice mode with an image acquisition time of 100 milliseconds and a section thickness of 3 mm. The use of a 26-cm2 field of view and a 512x512 reconstruction matrix yielded a pixel area of 0.258 mm2. Patients were positioned supine, and after localization of the main pulmonary artery, contiguous slices down to the apex of the heart were obtained with ECG-gated triggering at 80% of the RR interval.

Coronary foci with a CT density >=130 HU and an area of four or more adjacent pixels (>=1.03 mm2) were determined to represent coronary artery calcium. This protocol is widely used.5 The tomograms of all patients without coronary artery calcium detected with this protocol were also analyzed for the presence of coronary foci with a lower minimum lesion area of two or more adjacent pixels (>=0.52 mm2).

In the presence of EBCT coronary artery calcium, a lesion score was calculated by multiplying the area of the hyperattenuating focus in square millimeters by a "density factor" as described by Agatston et al.19 The density factor was determined from the peak density within the hyperattenuating focus. The threshold was set at 130 HU: 1=130 to 199 HU, 2=200 to 299 HU, 3=300 to 399 HU, 4>=400 HU. Calcific lesions were assigned to the distribution of the major coronary arteries, and a total calcium score was calculated as the sum of all lesion scores.

Coronary Angiography
Selective coronary angiography was performed by the Judkins technique in each patient with a minimum of two biplane projections for the left coronary artery system and one biplane projection for the right coronary artery by use of a HICOR System (Siemens). For lumen opacification only non-ionic contrast medium was used. Luminal narrowing of equal or more than 50% was defined as significant stenosis. Off-line quantitative coronary angiography (MEDIS, Reiber) was used to confirm categorization of lesions and to characterize the culprit lesion in the event-related coronary artery in patients with no detectable coronary artery calcium.20 Patients with significant stenoses (>50% diameter reduction) in one or at least two major vessels were defined as having one-vessel or multivessel coronary artery disease, respectively. Patients with significant stenoses and those with intermediate (>=30% to 50% luminal diameter) stenoses at more than one site in the coronary system were classified as having moderate to severe atherosclerotic disease. Two patients, one with occlusive arterial thrombosis and one with spontaneous coronary dissection, were considered not to have significant angiographic disease because there were no stenoses. However, the cause of acute MI was clearly visualized by coronary angiography, so the angiogram was considered positive for the sensitivity calculations.

Intracoronary Ultrasound
ICUS was performed after the coronary angiogram in 13 patients with no apparent or only mild angiographic disease. Catheters with 20- to 30-MHz transducers (Boston Scientific Corp) guided by a 0.014-in floppy guide wire (ACS) and connected to a console (Hewlett Packard) were used. The imaging catheter was positioned under fluoroscopic guidance into the distal segment of the respective coronary artery. The catheter was then pulled back manually to the proximal part of the respective coronary artery in 3- to 4-mm steps. Each position of the ultrasound catheter was marked separately, and a short fluoroscopic sequence was filmed concomitantly. All segments with signs of arteriosclerosis were marked. Finally, the ultrasound catheter was reinserted to the distal position, and a slow, continuous pullback registration (1 mm/s) was obtained. All data were stored continuously on a videotape system (Super VHS, Sony) for playback and off-line analysis.

Coronary artery sections were considered normal when the criteria proposed by Nissen et al21 and Ge et al22 were met. Plaques were defined as echo-dense structures with a sharp demarcation within the vessel lumen separated by an echo-lucent zone from the adjacent structures. Plaques were categorized as eccentric only if an arc of disease-free arterial wall was seen within the lesion.23 The presence of calcium was diagnosed when echoes brighter than the reference adventitia with acoustic shadowing of deeper arterial structures were observed.24 The minimal luminal diameter, corresponding vessel diameter, and external and internal elastic membrane cross-sectional areas were measured at end diastole.22 The plaque cross-sectional area was calculated by subtracting the internal elastic membrane (lumen) from the external elastic membrane cross-sectional area. Luminal diameter stenosis and area stenosis were calculated.

Statistical Analysis
Values are reported as mean±SD if not indicated otherwise. Characteristics of patients with and without coronary artery calcium detected by EBCT were compared by use of an unpaired t test for age distribution and {chi}2 and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to establish the relationship between the definition of calcium quantities by EBCT and the angiographic definition of significant disease. Sensitivity as the dependent y variable was plotted as a function of 1-specificity as the x variable (equivalent to the false-positive rate) to determine individual {x,y} pairs with different calcium scores. A value of P<.05 was considered significant for all statistical evaluations. The analyses were performed with the SigmaStat for Windows 1.0 (Jandel Corp) and True Epistat 5.10 (Epistat Services) software systems.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Of the 118 patients with acute coronary syndromes, 106 (90%) had positive EBCTs, ie, a calcium score >0. No coronary artery calcium was seen in 12 patients (10%), 9 patients with MI who were 46±12 years (23 to 67 years) of age, and 3 patients with unstable angina who were 46±15 years (32 to 61 years) of age (Table 1Down). The mean total EBCT score in the 106 patients with positive EBCTs was 427.0±516.2 (2.58 to 3099.3). It was significantly higher in 92 patients with MI than in 14 patients with unstable angina: 460.2±528.7 versus 197.0±248.2 (P<.01). When an altered scoring protocol with a minimum lesion area of two pixels (0.52 mm2) instead of four pixels (1.03 mm2) was used to define coronary artery calcium, a score >0 was seen in 5 of 12 patients (42%) who had negative EBCTs with the standard protocol.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Documentation of Acute Coronary Syndromes and the Sequence of Diagnostic and Interventional Measures in 12 Patients With Negative EBCTs

Coronary Anatomy as Defined by Arteriography
Of the 118 patients with acute coronary syndromes, 105 (89.0%) had significant angiographic disease: 103 patients (87%) with significant stenoses and 2 patients (2%) with no stenoses but arterial thrombotic occlusion (1 patient) and coronary dissection (1 patient). Nine patients (8%) had intermediate 30% to 50% diameter stenoses, 2 of whom had a single intermediate stenosis in an otherwise normal-appearing coronary system (confirmed by ICUS). Normal coronary angiograms or only minor wall irregularities were observed in 4 of 118 patients (3%). Of these patients, 2 had focal plaque formation visualized only by ICUS, whereas the other 2 had no plaques as determined by ICUS but had myocardial bridging (1 patient) and arterial spasm (1 patient). Thus, angiographically moderate to severe coronary atherosclerosis was found in 110 patients. In 8 patients, mild plaque formation at a single site (4 patients) or nonatherosclerotic mechanisms of acute ischemia (4 patients) were seen.

EBCT With Respect to Coronary Anatomy
Positive EBCTs were observed in 105 of the 110 patients (96%) with moderate to severe coronary atherosclerosis and in 1 of the other 8 patients (13%; P<.001). With regard to the detection of plaques in the whole patient population, the presence of calcium by EBCT showed a sensitivity comparable to the presence of significant angiographic stenoses: 90% and 87%, respectively. Using a calcium score >0 as the cutoff point, sensitivity and specificity of EBCT to diagnose significant angiographic stenoses or any angiographic stenoses >= 30% were 95% and 47% (significant stenoses) or 95% and 100% (stenoses >=30%), respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 93% and 58% (significant stenoses) or 100% and 50% (stenoses >=30%), respectively. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis of coronary calcium scores for the detection of significant angiographic CAD yielded an area under the curve of 0.90±0.03 (mean±SEM; P<.0001). The best values for sensitivity and specificity, 91% and 73%, respectively, were obtained at a cutoff score of 10.30 (Fig 1Down).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Receiver-operating characteristic curve comparing EBCT calcium scores to the standard, coronary angiography (ie, significant angiographic stenoses). The sensitivity of EBCT calcium scores with reference to coronary angiography is plotted as a function of (1-specificity) (equivalent to the false-positive rate) to determine individual {x,y} pairs with different calcium scores. The arrow indicates the calcium cutoff score with the best values for sensitivity and false-positive rate, 10.30 (see text for details).

Table 2Down gives the distribution of significant angiographic CAD and angiographic multivessel disease in patients with positive and negative EBCTs. Mild or no angiographic stenoses were seen in 1 of 106 patients (1%) with positive EBCTs but in 7 of 12 patients (58%) with negative EBCTs (including 1 patient with arterial thrombotic occlusion and 1 with coronary dissection; P<.001). Table 3Down describes the angiographic findings in the 12 patients with negative EBCTs. Fig 2Down shows three angiograms of patients with negative EBCTs.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Characteristics of Patients With Positive and Negative EBCTs


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Coronary Angiography Findings in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes and Negative EBCTs



View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Coronary angiographic findings in 3 patients with a negative EBCT calcium scan. a, A 47-year-old female patient (patient 5) with single intermediate stenosis of the right coronary artery and unstable angina; b, 43-year-old male patient (patient 7) with thrombus formation in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery and acute anterior MI (note the large vessel lumen with reference to the 8F catheter); and c, 67-year-old female patient (patient 12) with proximal occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery after anterior MI. Arrows indicate lesions.

Characteristics of Patients With Negative EBCTs
Patients with negative EBCTs were 12 years younger than patients with positive EBCTs (P<.001; Table 2Up). Mean and median ages were 46 and 44 years, respectively, and 8 of the 12 patients (67%) were <50 years of age, whereas only 22 of 106 patients (21%) with positive EBCTs were <50 years of age. The distribution of sex and most coronary risk factors was comparable in both groups (Table 2Up). However, although there was no difference in the overall percentage of past or present smokers, all 7 smokers with negative EBCTs were active smokers at the time of the unstable event, whereas this was true for only 31 of the 67 smokers (46%) with positive EBCTs (P<.05).

The percentage of patients with unstable angina rather than MI did not differ in patients with positive and negative EBCTs: 13% (14 of 106 patients) versus 25% (3 of 12 patients; P=NS). Furthermore, the prevalence of Q-wave MI among patients with MI did not differ in patients with positive and negative EBCTs: 72% (66 of 92 patients) versus 67% (6 of 9 patients; P=NS). At the time of the EBCT examination, 2 of 12 patients (17%) with negative EBCTs had developed small left ventricular aneurysms with well-preserved overall left ventricular function after MI (Table 1Up).

ICUS Characteristics of Patients With Negative EBCTs
ICUS was performed in 8 of 12 patients (67%) with negative EBCTs and in 5 of 106 patients (5%) with positive EBCTs. Except for one lesion with a diameter stenosis slightly >50% (54.5%), there were no significant stenoses in these patients. In 1 of the 8 patients with negative EBCTs, ICUS was performed only after directional coronary atherectomy. In 4 of these 8 patients (50%), eccentric plaques of a soft texture were documented (Fig 3cDown). The typical ultrasonic pattern of calcification was not seen in patients with negative EBCTs, but in 4 of 5 patients with positive EBCTs (Fig 3aDown). All plaques observed in patients with negative EBCTs had an arc of disease-free arterial wall within the lesion (ie, eccentric lesion; Fig 3cDown), whereas some degree of concentricity was seen in all plaques in the 5 patients with positive EBCTs (Fig 3aDown). Plaque area in the 4 patients with negative EBCTs who had plaques and were examined before any intervention was 6.6±2.5 mm2 (3.2 to 9.3 mm2), and area stenosis was 51.8±11.2 mm2 (39.9 to 65.5 mm2). In 1 of these patients, a tear in the middle of a plaque with an echo-lucent core indicated plaque rupture (Fig 3dDown1 and 3d2). Systolic and diastolic movement of the fibrous cap could be observed (Table 4Down).



View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. ICUS findings in patients with acute coronary syndromes. a, Positive EBCT; b through d, negative EBCT. a, A 56-year-old male patient with anterior MI. Concentric, partially calcified plaque in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. b, A 32-year-old male patient with anterior MI (patient 2). Smooth vessel walls in the mid–left anterior descending coronary artery in a segment with myocardial bridging. b1, Diastolic frame. b2, Systolic frame. The vessel walls are pressed against the ICUS catheter. c, A 47-year-old female patient with unstable angina (patient 5). Eccentric, soft plaque with echo-lucent inclusions in the mid–right coronary artery. d, A 44-year-old male patient with unstable angina and stunned anterior myocardium (patient 4). d1, Eccentric plaque with echo-lucent core and thin fibrous cap. The lesion is unstable. d2, Rupture of the fibrous cap is visualized (arrow).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. ICUS Findings in Patients With Documented Coronary Event and Negative EBCTs

In 3 patients with a negative EBCT, small intima lesions with an area <=1 mm2 and otherwise normal vessel walls were seen using ICUS. One patient had acute thrombotic occlusion of the proximal LAD. This occurred in a very large vessel segment with stasis of blood. Another of these patients showed catheter-induced coronary spasm directly distal to myocardial bridging in the mid LAD. In this and in another patient with myocardial bridging (Fig. 3bUp1 and 3b2), the intimal lesions were identified just proximal to the intramyocardial vessel segment (Table 4Up).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present study is the first investigation of EBCT calcium scans with regard to coronary artery anatomy in patients with unstable coronary syndromes. EBCT reliably identified coronary calcific plaques in those patients with moderate to severe coronary atherosclerotic disease. Negative calcium scans were seen in 10% of the patients. These patients were characterized by several attributes.

Low Atherosclerotic Plaque Burden in Patients With Negative EBCTs
In most patients with negative EBCTs, the acute coronary syndrome was considered to be caused either by mechanisms other than atherosclerosis (4 patients) or by focal atherosclerotic plaque formation (3 patients). Whereas patients with a positive EBCT had mostly significant angiographic and multivessel disease, significant angiographic stenoses were observed in only 5 of 12 patients with negative EBCTs, and only 1 patient had multivessel disease. ICUS in 8 patients with negative EBCTs revealed either no apparent atherosclerotic disease or soft plaques with a disease-free arc of the arterial wall and no ultrasonic calcification, characteristics that are found in early and angiographically silent coronary atherosclerosis.18 22 The percentage of patients with negative EBCTs reflects the difficulty to detect plaques in these patients rather than in those with more extensive angiographic disease. One patient had an isolated unstable plaque with ruptured fibrous cap. Interestingly, a follow-up EBCT examination 9 months later still did not detect any coronary artery calcium, although plaque healing had been demonstrated with ICUS 2 months after the unstable coronary event in this patient.25

Histopathological ex vivo2 6 and ICUS in vivo studies26 have shown that coronary artery segments with little atherosclerotic plaque burden may not be detected by EBCT. Although frequently only mildly to moderately stenotic lipid-rich plaques cause unstable coronary syndromes,12 most patients with acute coronary syndromes have angiographic multivessel disease.13 Autopsy examination of patients with fatal acute coronary events usually reveals extensive coronary atherosclerosis.27 In this regard, the population examined in the present study may not have been representative of a broader general population with acute coronary syndromes. It was a referral population, and some patients were explicitly referred to our department for further evaluation of angiographically indeterminate or minimal lesions by intracoronary two-dimensional and Doppler ultrasound techniques.18

Generally, plaque rupture and, as blood components are exposed to tissue factors in the lesion, thrombus deposition are considered the most common mechanisms of unstable coronary syndromes.28 The severity and duration of ischemia depend on the extent of thrombus formation in the diseased vessel. Although endothelial dysfunction, vasospasm, thrombosis, and atherosclerosis are all interrelated, it is now well established that coronary vasospasm and arterial thrombosis occasionally occur in the absence of atherosclerotic lesions.29 A variety of physical and chemical toxins may lead to a loss of endothelial vasodilatory and antithrombotic properties.28 Endothelial integrity is compromised not only in advanced atherosclerosis30 but also in apparently normal coronary arteries in the presence of risk factors.31

Younger Age in Patients With Negative EBCTs
In the present study, patients with negative EBCTs were significantly younger than patients with positive EBCTs, and 8 of 12 patients (67%) were <50 years of age. The appearance of calcium deposits is related to the natural history of atherosclerotic lesions, representing an active rather than a degenerative process.32 In lesions seen in adolescents, calcium is first detected intracellularly.33 Extracellular calcium appears in preatheromatous lesions usually found in middle-aged adults. Concerning lesion morphology, calcium deposits are more often observed in type Vb/VII lesions than in type III and IV lesions and thus are less often found in early stages of coronary atherosclerosis.33 34 Plaques of <50% area stenosis are frequently not calcified.2 As coronary plaque burden increases with age, the amount of calcification also increases.35 In general, the sensitivity of EBCT calcium scanning for the detection of significant CAD is best in patients >50 years of age.5

Smoking in Patients With Negative EBCTs
Of the 12 patients with negative EBCTs in the present study, 7 were active smokers at the time of the coronary event. Smoking was, together with hypercholesterolemia, the most common coronary risk factor in this group. In two studies evaluating risk factor correlates of EBCT coronary artery calcium, smoking was reported to be associated with an increased prevalence and extent of coronary calcification.36 37 However, these studies comprised heterogeneous groups of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients and did not differentiate between past and active smoking.

Smoking is a well-known risk factor for cardiovascular events. It exerts a deleterious effect on the vascular endothelium and causes direct vasoconstriction of both coronary epicardial and resistance vessels.38 39 Platelet aggregation and fibrinogen levels are increased, resulting in an enhanced risk of thrombosis even in the absence of severe atherosclerotic disease.40 In an ICUS study of target lesions in patients with stable and unstable angina, plaques in 37 of 52 smokers (71%) and in 46 of 94 nonsmokers (49%) were classified as soft rather than hard plaques (P=.01, univariate analysis).41 However, this difference was not significant in a multivariate analysis. In a pathological study of carotid plaques obtained at endarterectomy, smoking was found to be associated with a significantly increased frequency of mural plaque thrombosis.42

Study Limitations
The issue of repeatability and variability of EBCT scans was not addressed in the present study, although it plays an important role, especially in the range of CT density values in proximity to the threshold of 130 HU. Variation of scores may depend on breathing, improper ECG gating, imaging artifacts, and the size and localization of calcific deposits in the arterial tree.43 However, the EBCT protocol in the present study (CT density threshold=130 HU in an area >=1.03 mm2)19 is the one most widely used,5 and it was our intention to evaluate the EBCT protocol of most laboratories for the assessment of coronary artery calcium. In the present study, a minimum pixel area that was decreased from 1.03 to 0.52 mm2 identified coronary calcium in only 5 of 12 patients (42%) with negative standard EBCTs, and only 1 of the 8 patients <50 years was among them.

There is no generally accepted exact definition of moderate or severe coronary atherosclerosis in a coronary angiogram. There is no typical angiographic pattern of vulnerable plaques,44 and accordingly angiography does not allow the identification of individual plaques at risk. Yet despite its well-known limitations, coronary angiography is considered the standard method of evaluating coronary anatomy. We classified patients as having moderate to severe atherosclerosis in the presence of one or more angiographically significant stenosis or two or more intermediate stenoses in an otherwise normal-appearing arteriogram. Patients with only wall irregularities or a single intermediate stenosis were considered to have mild atherosclerotic disease, and this is certainly not inconsequential.

ICUS was performed to obtain additional information in patients with indeterminate arteriograms. Thus, few patients underwent an ICUS examination, and our data do not allow us to make general conclusions concerning the dominant plaque morphology in our patients. This did not, however, compromise the outcome of our study with respect to its purpose, which was to evaluate the detection of calcified plaques by EBCT in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Clinical Implications
The identification of patients at risk for atherosclerotic coronary events is of paramount importance because aggressive treatment of risk factors allows physicians to substantially lower the rate of events in these patients.45 In this setting, EBCT is a diagnostic modality of great interest because it is noninvasive, can be performed easily, and allows direct visualization of the coronary arteries. The present study demonstrates that EBCT identifies calcified plaques in the vast majority of patients with vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques. The excellent results reported in the first prognostic studies using EBCT10 11 are thus confirmed and further elucidated. On the other hand, patients with low coronary plaque burden or mechanisms of unstable events that are not specifically related to atherosclerosis may be missed by EBCT calcium scanning. This may be of concern, particularly in younger age groups and active smokers. The prognostic implication of negative EBCTs in these patients remains to be established. In two patients with negative EBCTs in the present study who had left ventricular aneurysms, overall left ventricular size and function were well preserved. Currently, EBCT seems a very promising method to identify patients at risk for future atherosclerosis-related coronary unstable events.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
CAD = coronary artery disease
EBCT = electron-beam computed tomography
HU = Hounsfield units
ICUS = intracoronary ultrasound


*    Acknowledgments
 
Dr Schmermund was supported in part by a grant from the German Research Association (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Schm 1233/1-1).

Received February 18, 1997; accepted March 30, 1997.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. McCarthy JH, Palmer FJ. Incidence and significance of coronary artery calcification. Br Heart J. 1974;36:499-506.[Free Full Text]
  2. Mautner GC, Mautner SL, Froehlich J, Feuerstein IM, Proschan MA, Roberts WC, Doppman JL. Coronary artery calcification: assessment with electron beam CT and histomorphometric correlation. Radiology. 1994;192:619-623.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Detrano R, Tang W, Kang X, Mahaisavariya P, McCrae M, Garner D, Peng SK, Measham C, Molloi S, Gutfinger D, Nickerson S, Brundage B. Accurate coronary calcium phosphate mass measurements from electron beam computed tomograms. Am J Card Imag. 1995;9:167-173.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Rumberger JA, Sheedy PF, Breen JR, Schwartz RS. Coronary calcium, as determined by electron beam computed tomography, and coronary disease on arteriogram: effect of patient's sex on diagnosis. Circulation. 1995;91:1363-1367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Budoff, MJ, Georgiou D, Brody A, Agatston AS, Kennedy J, Wolfkiel C, Stanford W, Shields P, Lewis RJ, Janowitz WR, Rich S, Brundage BH. Ultrafast computed tomography as a diagnostic modality in the detection of coronary artery disease: a multicenter study. Circulation. 1996;93:898-904.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Rumberger JA, Simons DB, Fitzpatrick LA, Sheedy PF, Schwartz RS. Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area: a histopathological correlative study. Circulation. 1995;92:2157-2162.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Emond M, Mock MB, Davis KB, Fisher LD, Holmes DR Jr, Chaitman BR, Kaiser GC, Alderman E, Killip T III. Long-term survival of medically treated patients in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry. Circulation. 1995;90:2645-2657.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Hangartner JR, Charleston AJ, Davies MJ, Thomas AC. Morphological characteristics of clinically significant coronary artery stenosis in stable angina. Br Heart J. 1986;56:501-508.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Wexler L, Brundage B, Crouse J, Detrano R, Fuster V, Maddahi J, Rumberger J, Stanford W, White R, Taubert K. Coronary artery calcification: pathophysiology, epidemiology, imaging methods, and clinical implications: a statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 1996;94:1175-1192.[Free Full Text]
  10. Detrano R, Hsiai T, Wang S, Puentes G, Fallavollita J, Shields P, Stanford W, Wolfkiel C, Georgiou D, Budoff M, Reed J. Prognostic value of coronary calcification and angiographic stenoses in patients undergoing coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:285-290.[Abstract]
  11. Arad Y, Sparado LA, Goodman K, Lledo-Perez A, Sherman S, Lerner G, Guerci A. Predictive value of electron beam computed tomography of the coronary arteries: 19-month follow-up of 1173 asymptomatic subjects. Circulation. 1996;93:1951-1953.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Little WC, Constantinescu M, Applegate RJ, Kutcher MA, Burrows MT, Kahl FR, Santamore WP. Can coronary angiography predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease? Circulation. 1988;78:1157-1166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Zimmerman FH, Cameron A, Fisher LD, Ng G. Myocardial infarction in young adults: angiographic characterization, risk factors and prognosis (Coronary Artery Surgery Study Registry). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:654-661.[Abstract]
  14. Falk E, Shah PK, Fuster V. Coronary plaque disruption. Circulation. 1995;92:657-671.[Free Full Text]
  15. Wong ND, Detrano RC, Abrahamson D, Tobis JM, Gardin JM. Coronary artery screening by electron beam computed tomography: facts, controversy, and future. Circulation. 1995;92:632-636.[Free Full Text]
  16. Nomenclature and criteria for diagnosis of ischemic heart disease: report of the Joint International Society of Cardiology/World Health Organization Task Force on Standardization of Clinical Nomenclature. Circulation. 1979;59:607-609.[Free Full Text]
  17. Mark DB, Jones RH. The national clinical practice guidelines for unstable angina. In: Califf RM, Mark DB, Wagner GS, eds. Acute Coronary Care. 2nd ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Yearbook Inc; 1995:503-523.
  18. Erbel R, Ge J, Bockisch A, Kearney P, Görge G, Haude M, Schümann D, Zamorano J, Rupprecht HJ, Meyer J. Value of intracoronary ultrasound and Doppler in the differentiation of angiographically normal coronary arteries: a prospective study in patients with angina pectoris. Eur Heart J. 1996;17:880-889.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:827-832.[Abstract]
  20. Haude M, Erbel R, Issa H, Meyer J. Quantitative analysis of elastic recoil after balloon angioplasty and after intracoronary implantation of balloon-expandable Palmaz-Schatz stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:26-34.[Abstract]
  21. Nissen SE, Gurley JC, Grines CL, Booth DC, McClure R, Berk M, Fischer C, DeMaria AN. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of lumen size and wall morphology in normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1991;84:1087-1099.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Ge J, Erbel R, Gerber T, Görge G, Koch L, Haude M, Meyer J. Intravascular ultrasound imaging of angiographically normal coronary arteries: a prospective study in vivo. Br Heart J. 1994;71:572-578.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF, Chuang YC, DeFalco RA, Leon MB. Limitations of angiography in the assessment of plaque distribution in coronary artery disease: a systematic study of target lesion eccentricity in 1446 lesions. Circulation. 1996;93:924-931.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Gerber T, Erbel R, Görge G, Ge J, Rupprecht HJ, Meyer J. Classification of morphologic effects of percutaneous tranluminal coronary angioplasty assessed by intracoronary ultrasound. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:1546-1554.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Baumgart D, Liu F, Haude M, Görge G, Ge J, Erbel R. Acute plaque rupture and myocardial stunning in patient with normal coronary arteriography. Lancet. 1995;346:193-194.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Baumgart D, Schmermund A, Görge G, Haude M, Ge J, Adamzik M, Sehnert C, Altmaier K, Grönemeyer D, Seibel R, Erbel R. Comparison of electron beam computed tomography with intracoronary ultrasound and coronary angiography for the detection of coronary atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. In press.
  27. Roberts WC, Kragel AH, Gertz SD, Roberts CS. Coronary arteries in unstable angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction, and sudden coronary death. Am Heart J. 1994;127:1588-1593.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Fuster V. Mechanisms leading to myocardial infarction: insights from studies of vascular biology. Circulation. 1994;90:2126-2146. Lewis A. Conner Memorial Lecture.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Yasue H, Omote S, Takizawa A, Nagao M. Coronary arterial spasm in ischemic heart disease and its pathogenesis. A review. Circ Res. 1983;52(suppl I):I-147-I-152.
  30. Bogaty P, Hackett D, Davies G, Maseri A. Vasoreactivity of the culprit lesion in unstable angina. Circulation. 1994;90:5-11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Reddy KG, Nair RN, Sheehan HM, Hodgson JMB. Evidence that selective endothelial dysfunction may occur in the absence of angiographic or ultrasound atherosclerosis in patients with risk factors for atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:833-843.[Abstract]
  32. Doherty TM, Detrano RC. Coronary arterial calcification as an active process: a new perspective on an old problem. Calcif Tissue Int. 1994;54:224-230.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Stary HC. The sequence of cell and matrix changes in atherosclerotic lesions of coronary arteries in the first forty years of life. Eur Heart J. 1990;11(suppl E):3-19.
  34. Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, Fuster V, Glagov S, Insull W, Rosenfeld ME, Schwartz CJ, Wagner WD, Wissler RW. A definition of advanced types of atherosclerosic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis: a report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1995;92:1355-1374.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Janowitz WR, Agatston AS, Kaplan G, Viamonte M. Differences in prevalence and extent of coronary artery calcium detected by ultrafast computed tomography in asymptomatic men and women. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:247-254.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Goel M, Wong ND, Eisenberg H, Hagar J, Kelly K, Tobis JM. Risk factor correlates of coronary calcium as evaluated by ultrafast computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:977-980.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Schmermund A, Lange S, Sehnert C, Altmaier K, Baumgart D, Görge G, Erbel R, Seibel R, Grönemeyer D. Elektronenstrahltomographie bei koronarer Herzkrankheit: Prävalenz und Verteilung von Koronarkalk und Assoziation mit koronaren Risikofaktoren bei 650 Patienten. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1995;120:1229-1235.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Benowitz HL. Pharmacologic aspects of cigarette smoking and nicotine addiction. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:1318-1330.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Quillen JE, Rossen JD, Oskarsson HJ, Minor RL, Lopez AG, Winniford MD. Acute effect of cigarette smoking in the coronary circulation: constriction of epicardial and resistance vessels. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:642-647.[Abstract]
  40. Fitzgerald GA, Oates JA, Nowak J. Cigarette smoking and hemostatic function. Am Heart J. 1988;115:267-271.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Rasheed Q, Nair R, Sheehan H, Hodgson JMB. Correlation of intracoronary ultrasound plaque characteristics in atherosclerotic coronary artery disease patients with clinical variables. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:753-758.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Spagnoli LG, Mauriello A, Palmieri G, Santeusanio G, Amante A, Taurino M. Relationships between risk factors and morphological patterns of human carotid atherosclerotic plaques: a multivariate discriminate analysis. Atherosclerosis. 1994;108:39-60.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Wang S, Detrano RC, Secci A, Tang W, Doherty TM, Puentes G, Wong N, Brundage BH. Detection of coronary calcification with electron-beam computed tomography: evaluation of interexamination reproducibility and comparison of three image-acquisition protocols. Am Heart J. 1996;132:550-558.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Mann JM, Davies MJ. Vulnerable plaque: relation of characteristics to degree of stenosis in human coronary arteries. Circulation. 1996;94:928-931.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. National Cholesterol Education Program. Second report of the expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel II). Circulation. 1993;89:1329-1445.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. S. White and D. Kuo
Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: Role of Multidetector CT
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 672 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. J. Budoff, S. Achenbach, R. S. Blumenthal, J. J. Carr, J. G. Goldin, P. Greenland, A. D. Guerci, J. A.C. Lima, D. J. Rader, G. D. Rubin, et al.
Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease by Cardiac Computed Tomography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology
Circulation, October 17, 2006; 114(16): 1761 - 1791.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
D. S. Berman, R. Hachamovitch, L. J. Shaw, J. D. Friedman, S. W. Hayes, L. E.J. Thomson, D. S. Fieno, G. Germano, N. D. Wong, X. Kang, et al.
Roles of Nuclear Cardiology, Cardiac Computed Tomography, and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Noninvasive Risk Stratification and a Conceptual Framework for the Selection of Noninvasive Imaging Tests in Patients with Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2006; 47(7): 1107 - 1118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
P.-H. Huang, L.-C. Chen, H.-B. Leu, P. Y.-A. Ding, J.-W. Chen, T.-C. Wu, and S.-J. Lin
Enhanced Coronary Calcification Determined by Electron Beam CT Is Strongly Related to Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2): 810 - 815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
S.E. Nissen
Identifying patients at risk: novel diagnostic techniques
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., July 1, 2004; 6(suppl_C): C15 - C20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. E. Hokanson, T. MacKenzie, G. Kinney, J. K. Snell-Bergeon, D. Dabelea, J. Ehrlich, R. H. Eckel, and M. Rewers
Evaluating Changes in Coronary Artery Calcium: An Analytic Method That Accounts for Interscan Variability
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1327 - 1332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Herzog, S. Dogan, T. Diebold, M. F. Khan, H. Ackermann, S. Schaller, T. G. Flohr, G. Wimmer-Greinecker, A. Moritz, and T. J. Vogl
Multi-Detector Row CT versus Coronary Angiography: Preoperative Evaluation before Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Radiology, October 1, 2003; 229(1): 200 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
K Pohle, D Ropers, R Maffert, P Geitner, W Moshage, M Regenfus, M Kusus, W G Daniel, and S Achenbach
Coronary calcifications in young patients with first, unheralded myocardial infarction: a risk factor matched analysis by electron beam tomography
Heart, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 625 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. G. O'Malley, I. M. Feuerstein, and A. J. Taylor
Impact of Electron Beam Tomography, With or Without Case Management, on Motivation, Behavioral Change, and Cardiovascular Risk Profile: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, May 7, 2003; 289(17): 2215 - 2223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Shemesh, S. Apter, Y. Itzchak, and M. Motro
Coronary Calcification Compared in Patients with Acute versus in Those with Chronic Coronary Events by Using Dual-Sector Spiral CT
Radiology, February 1, 2003; 226(2): 483 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
R. Erbell, T. Budde, G. Kerkhoff, S. Mohlenkamp, and A. Schmermund
Understanding the pathophysiology of the arterial wall: which method should we choose? Electron beam computed tomography
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., September 1, 2002; 4(suppl_F): F47 - F53.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
J. E. Hokanson, S. Cheng, J. K. Snell-Bergeon, B. A. Fijal, M. A. Grow, C. Hung, H. A. Erlich, J. Ehrlich, R. H. Eckel, and M. Rewers
A Common Promoter Polymorphism in the Hepatic Lipase Gene (LIPC-480C>T) Is Associated With an Increase in Coronary Calcification in Type 1 Diabetes
Diabetes, April 1, 2002; 51(4): 1208 - 1213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. Wayhs, A. Zelinger, and P. Raggi
High coronary artery calcium scores pose an extremely elevated risk for hard events
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 16, 2002; 39(2): 225 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Schmermund and R. Erbel
Unstable Coronary Plaque and Its Relation to Coronary Calcium
Circulation, October 2, 2001; 104(14): 1682 - 1687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
R. M. Weiss
Another Calcium Paradox?
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2001; 21(10): 1561 - 1562.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. C. Keelan, L. F. Bielak, K. Ashai, L. S. Jamjoum, A. E. Denktas, J. A. Rumberger, P. F. Sheedy, II, P. A. Peyser, and R. S. Schwartz
Long-Term Prognostic Value of Coronary Calcification Detected by Electron-Beam