(Circulation. 1997;96:475-483.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan (T.K., S.K., T.T., H.Y., Y.N., H.Y., N.H., H.N., M.N.), and the Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging Laboratory, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (G.S.M., J.J.P, M.B.L).
Correspondence to Takeshi Kimura, MD, 1-1 Kifune-machi, Kokurakita-ku, Kitakyushu, 802, Japan.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results To understand remodeling of human coronary arteries undergoing coronary angioplasty or atherectomy, serial intravascular ultrasonographic examinations were performed at preintervention and postintervention examinations and at 24 hours, 1 month, and 6 months. Complete serial data were obtained in 61 lesions (balloon angioplasty, 35 lesions; directional atherectomy, 26 lesions). Lumen area improved from 6.81±2.24 mm2 after intervention to 8.22±2.79 mm2 at 1 month (P=.0001) and decreased to 4.88±2.86 mm2 at 6 months (P=.0001). Vessel area enlarged from 17.32±5.35 mm2 after intervention to 19.39±5.33 mm2 at 1 month (P=.0001) and decreased to 16.33±5.54 mm2 at 6 months (P=.0001). Plaque+media area increased significantly from postintervention examination to 24 hours (10.51±4.38 versus 10.96±4.49 mm2, P=.0008) and from 24 hours to 6 months (10.96±4.49 versus 11.45±4.45 mm2, P=.03). Changes in lumen area in each study interval correlated more closely with changes in vessel area than with changes in plaque+media area. Restenotic lesions compared with nonrestenotic lesions had a greater decrease in the vessel area between 1 month and 6 months (-4.33±2.73 versus -2.49±2.15 mm2, P=.006) and greater increase in the plaque+media area both within 24 hours (0.84±1.22 versus 0.27±0.38 mm2, P=.04) and between 24 hours and 6 months (1.19±2.19 versus 0.18±1.46 mm2, P=.04).
Conclusions Remodeling after coronary angioplasty or atherectomy was characterized by early adaptive enlargement and late constriction of the vessel.
Key Words: remodeling angioplasty vessels
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Angiographic Analysis
Quantitative angiographic analysis was performed with
the Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System
II.19 Minimal luminal diameter, interpolated reference
diameter, and diameter stenosis were calculated by the
computer. The measurement was performed in two angiographic views and
the average values were calculated in each study.
Initial and follow-up studies were performed in the same angiographic
projections using the same cineangiographic machines.
Intracoronary injection of 5 mg of isosorbide dinitrate was
performed before each study. 8F guiding catheters free of contrast
medium were filmed at the center of the image and were used for
calibration. The diameter of the catheter tip used in each study was
measured by a caliper. Reproducibility of quantitative angiographic
analysis in our laboratory was detailed
elsewhere.20 Restenosis was defined as
stenosis of
50% observed at 6-month follow-up.
Intravascular Ultrasonographic Analysis
The intravascular ultrasonographic imaging system used in this
study incorporated a single-element, 30-MHz beveled transducer within
either a 2.9F or a 3.2F imaging catheter
(Cardiovascular Imaging Systems Inc). In all studies
the transducer was withdrawn at 0.5 mm · s with the use of
a motorized pullback device. A complete ultrasonographic imaging run
was performed from beyond the target lesion to the aortoostial
junction. Studies were recorded on [1/2]-in high-resolution s-VHS
videoptape for off-line analysis.
Measurements of cross-sectional area by intravascular ultrasonography have been validated previously.21 With the use of computerized planimetry, the vessel area and lumen area were measured. The plaque+media area was calculated as vessel area minus lumen area. The vessel area was defined as the area within the border between the hypoechoic media and the echoreflective adventitia. When atherosclerotic tissue encompassed the ultrasound catheter, the lumen was assumed to be the same physical size as the catheter. To minimize the influence of vessel size, relative (vessel, lumen, and plaque+media) areas were calculated as (absolute areas-1 · vessel area at preintervention examination)x100. Quantitative measurements were performed independently at both Washington Hospital Center and Kokura Memorial Hospital. The anatomic slices selected for serial analysis of the lesion site had an axial location within the target lesion at the smallest lumen area at 6-month follow-up (in the Washington analysis) and at the smallest lumen area at preintervention study (in the Kokura analysis). Average values of the two centers were calculated and considered to represent the geometry of the lesion. The reference segment (selected from the preintervention study) was the most normal-looking cross section within 10 mm proximal to the lesion but distal to any major side branch.
Identification of the same anatomic slices throughout the serial studies was performed as follows. The anatomic slice with the smallest lumen was identified first; the distance from this slice to the closest axial landmark then was measured using seconds or frames of videotape. In general, the axial landmarks were within 10 mm of the image slice. Finally, this distance was used to identify the corresponding anatomic slices throughout the serial studies. Vascular and perivascular markings such as small side branches, venous structures, and calcific and fibrotic deposits were used to confirm proper identification of the image slices. The accuracy and reproducibility of intravascular ultrasound length measurements with the use of a motorized transducer pullback device were previously validated in human coronary arteries.22 The reproducibility of sequential intravascular ultrasonographic measurements was also previously validated.15
Statistical Analysis
Values are expressed as mean±SD. Paired numerical data obtained
by serial study were compared by the paired t test and other
continuous variables by the unpaired t test. Linear
regression analysis was used to assess the interobserver
variability of quantitative ultrasonographic measurements and
correlation among vessel area, lumen area, and plaque+media area. All
tests of significance were two tailed, and probability values of <.05
were considered to indicate statistical
significance.23
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
180° was noted in only 12% of lesions. Furthermore, by an effort
to avoid calcification for cross-sectional measurements, only one
lesion had calcific arc of
180° in the analyzed cross
sections.
|
In 35 lesions treated by balloon angioplasty, the mean balloon size was 3.19±0.29 mm for vessels 2.77±0.41 mm in diameter. In 26 lesions treated by directional atherectomy, adjunctive balloon angioplasty was performed in 12 lesions. In all lesions, a 7F device was used, resulting in retrieval of 16.3±8.3 mg of tissue.
Serial Angiographic Result
Minimal luminal diameter improved from 1.02±0.27 mm
before intervention to 2.16±0.43 mm after intervention
(P=.0001) and did not change at 24 hours (2.15±0.47
mm, P=.71 versus after intervention) (Table 2
). Significant improvement of
minimal luminal diameter was noted between 24 hours and 1 month
(2.15±0.47 mm at 24 hours; 2.29±0.48 mm at 1 month;
P=.0008). A marked decrease of minimal luminal diameter was
observed between 1 and 6 months (2.29±0.48 mm at 1 month;
1.65±0.56 mm at 6 months; P=.0001). Minimal luminal
diameter measured by angiography and lumen area by ultrasonography
revealed a consistent time course (Fig 1
). At 6 months,
restenosis was documented in 19 lesions (31.1%), with target
lesion revascularization in 15 lesions
(24.6%).
|
|
Serial Intravascular Ultrasonographic Result
Vessel area increased from 15.45±5.24 mm2
before intervention to 17.32±5.35 mm2 after
intervention (P=.0001) and plaque+media area decreased from
13.37±5.04 mm2 before intervention to
10.51±4.38 mm2 after intervention
(P=.0001) (Table 3
). At 24 hours, both vessel
area (17.32±5.35 mm2 after intervention;
17.89±5.38 mm2 at 24 hours; P=.002) and
plaque+media area (10.51±4.38 mm2 after intervention;
10.96±4.49 mm2 at 24 hours; P=.0008)
increased significantly, with no change in lumen area (6.81±2.24
mm2 after intervention; 6.93±2.53 mm2 at
24 hours; P=.37). Between 24 hours and 1 month, vessel area
increased significantly (17.89±5.38 mm2 at 24 hours;
19.39±5.33 mm2 at 1 month; P=.0001).
Enlargement of the vessel resulted in significant improvement of lumen
area in this interval (6.93±2.53 mm2 at 24 hours;
8.22±2.79 mm2 at 1 month; P=.0001).
Between 1 and 6 months, vessel area decreased significantly
(19.39±5.33 mm2 at 1 month; 16.33±5.54
mm2 at 6 months; P=.0001). Constriction of
the vessel resulted in marked lumen loss in this interval
(8.22±2.79 mm2 at 1 month; 4.88±2.86
mm2 at 6 months; P=.0001). Plaque+media area
increased significantly from 24 hours to 6 months (10.96±4.49
mm2 at 24 hours; 11.45±4.45 mm2 at 6
months; P=.03). These observations were also true after
correction for vessel size (Table 3
). A case showing typical biphasic
remodeling after directional coronary atherectomy is
illustrated in Fig 2
.
|
|
Serial changes in the lumen area closely paralleled changes in the
vessel area (Fig 3
). Changes
in the lumen area in each interval correlated closely with changes in
the vessel area (Fig 4
).
Changes in the lumen area did not correlate with changes in the
plaque+media area in the intervals between postintervention study and
24 hours (r=.07, P=.58) and between 24 hours and
1 month (r=.04, P=.76). Between 1 and 6 months, a
decrease in the lumen area correlated only weakly with an increase in
the plaque+media area (r=.26, P=.04).
|
|
Reference segment measurements paralleled lesion site measurements
(Table 3
). Angiographic reference diameter also showed early
enlargement and late constriction (Table 2
).
Quantitative analysis of intravascular ultrasonography,
independently performed at two centers, revealed excellent agreement
(Table 2
). The differences in the measurements were 0.09±1.71
mm2 for the vessel area, 0.21±0.98 mm2
for the lumen area, and 0.13±1.73 mm2 for the
plaque+media area. Correlation coefficients were .95 for the vessel
area, .95 for the lumen area, and .93 for the plaque+media area. Most
importantly, the time course of the changes in the vessel, lumen, and
plaque+media area was consistent by both analyses.
Balloon Angioplasty Versus Directional Coronary
Atherectomy
Since significantly larger vessels were treated by directional
atherectomy, serial changes were analyzed by indexing to
relative vessel, lumen, and plaque+media area. Early increase and late
decrease of relative vessel area were similarly observed in both groups
(Table 4
). Although we could
not find any differences in interval changes of relative vessel, lumen,
and plaque+media area between the two groups, our samples are obviously
underpowered to make this kind of subgroup analysis.
|
Restenotic Lesions Versus Nonrestenotic Lesions
Increase in the vessel area at 1 month was similar between 19
lesions with restenosis and 42 lesions without
restenosis (Table 5
).
However, decrease in the vessel area between 1 and 6 months was
significantly greater in the restenotic lesions
(-4.33±2.73 mm2 in the restenotic lesions;
-2.49±2.15 mm2 in the nonrestenotic lesions;
P=.006), resulting in greater lumen loss in this interval
(-5.04±1.72 mm2 in the restenotic lesions;
-2.57±2.23 mm2 in the nonrestenotic lesions;
P=.0001).
|
Regarding the changes in the plaque+media area, greater increase was observed in the restenotic lesions within 24 hours (0.84±1.22 mm2 in the restenotic lesions; 0.27±0.38 mm2 in the nonrestenotic lesions; P=.04) and between 24 hours and 6 months (1.19±2.19 mm2 in the restenotic lesions; 0.18±1.46 mm2 in the nonrestenotic lesions; P=.04).
Net Changes During 6 Months of Follow-up
The lumen area decreased from 6.81±2.24 mm2
after intervention to 4.88±2.86 mm2 at 6 months.
Decrease in the vessel area (-0.99±2.58 mm2) and
increase in the plaque+media area (0.94±1.91 mm2)
almost equally contributed to late lumen loss. However, the change in
the lumen area correlated more strongly with the change in the vessel
area (r=.72, P=.0001) than with the change in the
plaque+media area (r=.34, P=.0008). The change in
the vessel area and change in the plaque+media area also were
significantly correlated (r=.42, P=.0008) (Fig 5
).
|
In 19 lesions (31.1%), there was a net increase in total vessel area from postintervention study to 6-month follow-up. Restenosis rate was not different between the two groups with or without vessel enlargement (26.3% versus 33.3%, P=.58). However, late lumen loss assessed by quantitative coronary angiography was significantly less in lesions with vessel enlargement (-0.29±0.63 versus -0.61±0.55 mm, P=.05).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Using serial intravascular ultrasonography, Mintz et al15 suggested that the predominant mechanism responsible for late lumen loss is constrictive remodeling rather than tissue growth. Di Mario et al26 reported that constrictive remodeling was the main operative mechanism of lumen dimension after balloon angioplasty but not after directional atherectomy. In an analysis of 36 restenotic lesions, Braden et al27 concluded that the predominant mechanism of late lumen loss was an increase in plaque area rather than constrictive remodeling. We could not explain the reason why results from intravascular ultrasonographic studies were not consistent regarding the role of constrictive remodeling. However, considering the bidirectional nature of arterial remodeling, the small sample size in these two studies might be misleading.
In this study, remodeling after coronary angioplasty or atherectomy was characterized by early (within 24 hours, and 24 hours to 1 month) enlargement of the vessel and late (1 month to 6 months) constriction of the vessel. In addition, significant increase in the plaque+media area was observed both within 24 hours and from 24 hours to 6 months.
The early increase in plaque+media area could be explained by
thrombosis.28 Alternatively, if one of the mechanisms of
balloon angioplasty is axial redistribution of plaque,29
partial reversal of this phenomenon might explain early increase in
plaque+media area observed in a single-slice analysis. We
previously reported that a significant decrease in stenosis
diameter within 24 hours occurs in
16% of patients.4
Also in the current study, we observed significant decrease in minimal
luminal diameter within 24 hours after balloon angioplasty but not
after directional atherectomy. Rodriguez et al30 reported
that coronary stenting decreased restenosis in lesions
with early lumen loss within 24 hours after coronary
angioplasty. Considering the efficacy of stents in preventing
restenosis in this group of patients, partial reversal of axial
plaque redistribution rather than thrombosis might be a major mechanism
of early increase in the plaque+media area. On the other hand, early
enlargement of the vessel observed at 24 hours could be partly
explained by release of vasospasm. Even after intracoronary
administration of nitrates, prolonged vasospasm could persist,
especially after use of bulky (eg, atherectomy) devices.
Further enlargement of the vessel at 1 month could be explained by the increase in the wall shear stress resulting from the augmented local flow after angioplasty.17 31 32 Release of the cicatrizing effects of the noncompliant plaque by angioplasty might increase coronary distensibility, allowing the vessel to distend in response to arterial pressure.33 This adaptive remodeling could also result from the response to early growth of neointimal tissue analogous to the original observation by Glagov et al.24 Adaptive remodeling explains why most patients are stable up to 1 or 2 months after coronary angioplasty even in the presence of extensive dissection and/or overtly suboptimal result.
The increase in the plaque+media area between 24 hours and 6 months, which would be an ultrasonographic index of intimal proliferation, was significantly greater in the restenotic lesions compared with the nonrestenotic lesions. Numerous reports of human necropsy studies demonstrating intimal hyperplasia as a mechanism of restenosis could not be dismissed easily.9 10 11 However, this study demonstrated that late constriction of the vessel is an additional important mechanism of restenosis. Between 1 and 6 months, when luminal renarrowing was most prevalent, constriction of the vessel contributed to lumen loss much more than the increase in plaque+media area. This late constriction of the vessel was significantly more prominent in restenotic lesions compared with nonrestenotic lesions.
Several mechanisms could be proposed to explain constriction of the vessel. This study clearly demonstrated that constriction of the vessel is a late event, that it follows early enlargement of the vessel, and therefore is distinct from early passive elastic recoil. Adventitial fibrosis could play an important role in constricting the vessel. Andersen et al34 reported impressive neoadventitial formation 3 weeks after angioplasty in a porcine coronary model. Scar contracture of the plaque could be another important mechanism of late constriction of the vessel. O'Brien et al35 demonstrated that transforming growth factor-ß, which is known to be a key mediator of tissue fibrois,36 was overexpressed in the fibrous connective tissue of restenotic coronary lesions. In this and other studies15 using serial intravascular ultrasonography, extreme decrease in the vessel area was often associated with a decrease in the plaque+media area, suggesting the presence of plaque retraction and/or apoptosis.37
In this study, remodeling of the reference segment was demonstrated to parallel the response of the lesion site. The reference segment was selected within 10 mm of the center of the lesion and therefore was inevitably influenced by the injury of interventional procedures. Results from this and a previous angiographic study4 as well as an animal study34 were consistent with the idea that remodeling has some axial length. Actually, we did measure two different sites at two different centers because we were not sure which anatomic slices should be measured; by measuring two different slices and averaging them, we were able to obtain a sense of overall lesion geometry.
This study has several important limitations. Accurate identification of the same anatomic cross section on serial studies is still a challenge for current methods of analysis of intravascular ultrasonography. Second, the number of restenotic lesions were relatively small. However, prospective enrollment of patients and a high rate of follow-up afforded enough statistical power to evaluate time course of arterial remodeling.
This study demonstrated that mechanisms of late lumen loss after coronary angioplasty were heterogeneous, with variable contribution of each mechanism depending on the time after the procedure. Intracoronary stents could reduce the rate of restenosis38 39 by eliminating early increase in the plaque+media area and late constriction of the vessel as well as by obtaining a larger lumen immediately after the procedure. However, this is at the expense of early compensatory enlargement and more prominent intimal hyperplasia. Future strategies to reduce restenosis should target prevention of late constrictive remodeling and enhancement of adaptive remodeling as well as suppression of intimal hyperplasia.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received November 18, 1996; revision received February 5, 1997; accepted February 11, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Detre K, Holubkov R, Kelsey S, Cowley M, Kent K, Williams D, Myler R, Faxon D, Holmes D Jr, Bourassa M, Block P, Gosselin A, Bentivoglio L, Leatherman L, Dorros G, King S III, Galichia J, Al-Bassam M, Leon M, Robertson T, Passamani E, for the Coinvestigators of the NHLBI PTCA Registry. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in 1985-1986 and 1977-1984: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Registry. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:265-270.[Abstract]
3. Califf RM, Fortin DF, Frid DJ, Harlan WR III, Ohman EM, Bengston JR, Nelson CL, Tcheng JE, Mark DB, Stack RS. Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: an overview. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:2B-13B.
4. Nobuyoshi M, Kimura T, Nosaka H, Mioka S, Ueno K, Yokoi H, Hamasaki N, Horiuchi H, Ohishi H. Restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: serial angiographic follow-up of 229 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:616-623.[Abstract]
5.
Serruys PW, Luijten HE, Beatt KJ, Geuskens R, de
Feyter PJ, Van den Brand M, Reiber JHC, Ten Katen HJ, Van Es GA,
Hugenholtz PG. Incidence of restenosis after successful
coronary angioplasty: a time-related phenomenon.
Circulation. 1988;77:361-371.
6.
Steele PM, Chesebro JH, Stanson AW, Holmes DR,
Dewanjee MK, Badimon L. Balloon angioplasty: natural history of
the pathophysiological response to injury in a pig
model. Circ Res. 1985;57:105-112.
7. Schwartz RS, Huber KC, Murphy JG, Edwards WD, Camrud AR, Vlietstra RE, Holmes DR. Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:267-274.[Abstract]
8. Muller DWM, Ellis SG, Topol EJ. Experimental models of coronary artery restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:418-432.[Abstract]
9.
Essed CE, Van Den Brand M, Becker AE.
Transluminal coronary angioplasty and early restenosis:
fibrocellular occlusion after wall laceration. Br
Heart J. 1983;49:393-396.
10. Austin GE, Ratliff NB, Hollman J, Tabei S, Phillips DF. Intimal proliferation of smooth muscle cells as an explanation for recurrent coronary artery stenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985;6:369-375.[Abstract]
11. Nobuyoshi M, Kimura T, Ohishi H, Horiuchi H, Nosaka H, Hamasaki H, Yokoi H, Kim K. Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: pathologic observations in 20 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:433-439.[Abstract]
12.
Post MJ, Borst C, Kuntz RE. The relative
importance of arterial remodeling compared with intimal
hyperplasia in lumen renarrowing after balloon angioplasty: a study in
the normal rabbit and the hypercholesterolemic Yucatan
micropig. Circulation. 1994;89:2816-2821.
13.
Kakuta T, Currier JW, Haudenschild CC, Ryan T, Faxon
DP. Differences in compensatory vessel enlargement, not intimal
formation, account for restenosis after angioplasty in the
hypercholesterolemic rabbit model.
Circulation. 1994;89:2809-2815.
14.
Lafont A, Guzman LA, Whitlow PL, Goormastic M, Cornhill
JF, Chisolm GM. Restenosis after experimental
angioplasty: intimal, medial, and adventitial changes associated with
constrictive remodeling. Circ Res. 1995;76:996-1002.
15.
Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF,
Wong SC, Hong MK, Kovach JA, Leon MB. Arterial
remodeling after coronary angioplasty: a serial intravascular
ultrasound study. Circulation. 1996;94:35-43.
16. Currier JW, Faxon DP. Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: have we been aiming at the wrong target? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:516-520.[Abstract]
17.
Glagov S. Intimal hyperplasia, vascular
modeling, and the restenosis problem.
Circulation. 1994;89:2888-2891.
18.
Isner JM. Vascular remodeling: honey, I think I
shrunk the artery. Circulation. 1994;89:2937-2941.
19. Serruys PW, Foley DP, de Feyter PJ, eds. Quantitative Coronary Angiography in Clinical Practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic; 1994.
20.
Kimura T, Yokoi H, Nakagawa Y, Tamura T, Kaburagi S,
Sawada Y, Sato Y, Yokoi H, Hamasaki N, Nosaka H, Nobuyoshi M.
Three-year follow-up after implantation of metallic
coronary-artery stents. N Engl J
Med. 1996;334:561-566.
21. Nishimura RA, Edwards WD, Warnes CA, Reeder GS, Hokmes DR Jr, Tajik AJ, Yock PG. Intravascular ultrasound imaging: in vitro validation and pathologic correlation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:145-154.[Abstract]
22. Fuessl RT, Mintz GS, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF, Popma JJ, Leon MB. In vivo validation of intravascular ultrasound length measurements using a motorized transducer pullback system. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:1115-1118.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Matthews DE, Farewell VT. Using and Understanding Medical Statistics. 2nd ed. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 1988.
24. Glagov S, Weisenberg E, Zarins CK, Stankunavicius R, Kolettis GJ. Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1371-1375.[Abstract]
25.
Gertz SD, Gimple LW, Banai S, Ragosta M, Powers ER,
Roberts WC, Perez LS, Sarembock IJ. Geometric remodeling is not
the principal pathogenetic process in restenosis after balloon
angioplasty. Circulation. 1994;90:3001-3008.
26. Di Mario C, Gil R, Camenzind E, Ozaki Y, von Birgelen C, Umans V, de Jaegere P, de Feyter PJ, Roelandt JRTC, Serruys PW. Quantitative assessment with intracoronary ultrasound of the mechanisms of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and directional coronary atherectomy. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:772-777.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Braden GA, Young TM, Utley L, Kutcher MA, Appelegate J, Herrington DM. Fibrointimal hyperplasia is the predominant mechanism of late lumen loss in symptomatic patients with coronary restenosis. Circulation. 1995;92(suppl I):I-148. Abstract.
28. Schwartz RS, Holmes DR Jr, Topol EJ. The restenosis paradigm revisited: an alternative proposal for cellular mechanisms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:1284-1293.[Abstract]
29. Mintz GS, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF, Popma JJ, Leon MB. Axial plaque redistribution as a mechanism of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:427-430.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Rodriguez AE, Santaera O, Larribau M, Fernandez M,
Sarmiento R, Baliño NP, Newell JB, Rouibn GS, Palacios IF.
Coronary stenting decreases restenosis in lesions with
early loss in luminal diameter 24 hours after successful PTCA.
Circulation. 1995;91:1397-1402.
31. Kamiya A, Togawa T. Adaptive regulation of wall shear stress to flow change in the canine carotid artery. Am J Physiol. 1990;239:H14-H21.
32. Zarins CK, Zatina MA, Giddens DP, Ku DN, Glagov S. Shear stress regulation of artery lumen diameter in experimental atherogenesis. J Vasc Surg. 1987;5:413-420.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Botas J, Clark DA, Pinto F, Chenzbraun A, Fischell TA. Balloon angioplasty results in increased segmental coronary distensibility: a likely mechanism of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:1043-1052.[Abstract]
34.
Andersen HR, Maeng M, Thorwest M, Falk E.
Remodeling rather than neointimal formation explains
luminal narrowing after deep vessel wall injury: insights from a
porcine coronary (re)stenosis model.
Circulation. 1996;93:1716-1724.
35.
O'Brien ER, Bunnett KL, Garvin MR, Zedric TX, Hinohara
T, Simpson JB, Kimura T, Nobuyoshi M, Mizgala H, Purchio A, Schwartz
SM. ßig-h3, a transforming growth factor-ßinducible gene,
is overexpressed in atherosclerotic and restenotic human
vascular lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16:576-584.
36.
Border WA, Nobel NA. Transforming growth
factor-ß in tissue fibrosis. N Engl J
Med. 1994;331:1286-1292.
37.
Isner JM, Kearney M, Bortman S, Passeri J.
Apoptosis in human atherosclerosis and
restenosis. Circulation. 1995;91:2703-2711.
38.
Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, Schatz RA, Penn I, Detre
K, Savage MP, Veltri L, Ricci D, Nobuyoshi M, Cleman M, Heuser R,
Almond D, Teirstein P, Fish D, Colombo A, Brinker J, Moses J, Hirshfeld
J, Bailey S, Ellis S, Rake R, Goldberg S. A randomized
comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty
in the treatment of coronary artery disease.
N Engl J Med. 1994;331:496-501.
39.
Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch
W, Heyndrickx G, Emanuelsson H, Marco J, Legrand V, Materne P, Belardi
J, Sigwart U, Colombo A, Goy J-J, van den Heuvel P, Delcan J, Morel MA,
for the Benestent Study Group. A comparison of balloon expandable stent
placement and balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary
artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:489-495.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. A. Ormiston and P. W.S. Serruys Bioabsorbable Coronary Stents Circ Cardiovasc Interv, June 1, 2009; 2(3): 255 - 260. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. J. Hong, G. S. Mintz, S. W. Kim, S. Y. Lee, S. Y. Kim, T. Okabe, A. D. Pichard, L. F. Satler, R. Waksman, K. M. Kent, et al. Disease progression in nonintervened saphenous vein graft segments a serial intravascular ultrasound analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 14, 2009; 53(15): 1257 - 1264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Matter, L. Ma, T. von Lukowicz, P. Meier, C. Lohmann, D. Zhang, U. Kilic, E. Hofmann, S.-W. Ha, M. Hersberger, et al. Increased Balloon-Induced Inflammation, Proliferation, and Neointima Formation in Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) Knockout Mice Stroke, October 1, 2006; 37(10): 2625 - 2632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. D. Defawe, R. D. Kenagy, C. Choi, S. Y.C. Wan, C. Deroanne, B. Nusgens, N. Sakalihasan, A. Colige, and A. W. Clowes MMP-9 regulates both positively and negatively collagen gel contraction: A nonproteolytic function of MMP-9 Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2005; 66(2): 402 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Liu, Z.-Q. Chen, G. C. Bobustuc, J. M. McNatt, H. Segall, S. Pan, J. T. Willerson, and P. Zoldhelyi Local Gene Transduction of Cyclooxygenase-1 Increases Blood Flow in Injured Atherosclerotic Rabbit Arteries Circulation, April 12, 2005; 111(14): 1833 - 1840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Koch, J. Mehilli, A. Pfeufer, A. Schomig, and A. Kastrati Apolipoprotein E gene polymorphisms and thrombosis and restenosis after coronary artery stenting J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2004; 45(12): 2221 - 2226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C-K Wong, C J K Hammett, R The, J K French, W Gao, B J Webber, J M Elliott, A W Hamer, J A Ormiston, M W I Webster, et al. Lack of association between baseline plasma homocysteine concentrations and restenosis rates after a first elective percutaneous coronary intervention without stenting Heart, November 1, 2004; 90(11): 1299 - 1302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Hoppmann, W. Koch, A. Schomig, and A. Kastrati The 5A/6A polymorphism of the stromelysin-1 gene and restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2004; 25(4): 335 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. V. Dee and H. Samady Evolving Strategies for the Prevention and Treatment of Coronary Restenosis Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2003; 7(3): 281 - 293. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Leidenfrost, M. F. Khan, K. P. Boc, B. R. Villa, E. T. Collins, W. C. Parks, D. R. Abendschein, and E. T. Choi A Model of Primary Atherosclerosis and Post-Angioplasty Restenosis in Mice Am. J. Pathol., August 1, 2003; 163(2): 773 - 778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Faxon Restenosis: do we need to understand it to treat it? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 18, 2002; 40(12): 2090 - 2091. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mochizuki, B. Brassart, and A. Hinek Signaling Pathways Transduced through the Elastin Receptor Facilitate Proliferation of Arterial Smooth Muscle Cells J. Biol. Chem., November 15, 2002; 277(47): 44854 - 44863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. DeFranco Understanding the pathophysiology of the arterial wall: which method should we choose? Intra-vascular ultrasound Eur. Heart J. Suppl., September 1, 2002; 4(suppl_F): F29 - F40. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yoshitomi, S. Kojima, M. Yano, Y. Matsumoto, T. Sugi, M. Saotome, K.-e Tanaka, M. Endo, and M. Kuramochi Peristent Tissue Proliferation of Multilink Stents Is Dependent on Preprocedural Plaque Area: A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis Angiology, May 1, 2002; 53(3): 303 - 311. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. S. Galis and J. J. Khatri Matrix Metalloproteinases in Vascular Remodeling and Atherogenesis: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Circ. Res., February 22, 2002; 90(3): 251 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Sasseen, B. D. Gray, D. Gal, R. Lorinc, D. C. Carpenter, B. D. Klugherz, and R. L. Wilensky Local Delivery of a Hydrophobic Heparin Reduces Neointimal Hyperplasia After Balloon Injury in Rat Carotid but not Pig Coronary Arteries Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, December 1, 2001; 6(4): 377 - 383. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Okura, M. Hayase, S. Shimodozono, H. N. Bonneau, P. G. Yock, and P. J. Fitzgerald Impact of pre-interventional arterial remodeling on subsequent vessel behavior after balloon angioplasty: a serial intravascular ultrasound study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2001; 38(7): 2001 - 2005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Schoenhagen, K. M. Ziada, D. G. Vince, S. E. Nissen, and E. M. Tuzcu Arterial remodeling and coronary artery disease: the concept of "dilated" versus "obstructive" coronary atherosclerosis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2001; 38(2): 297 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Ward, P. Kanellakis, D. Ramsey, J. Funder, and A. Bobik Eplerenone Suppresses Constrictive Remodeling and Collagen Accumulation After Angioplasty in Porcine Coronary Arteries Circulation, July 24, 2001; 104(4): 467 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Mintz, S. E. Nissen, W. D. Anderson, S. R. Bailey, R. Erbel, P. J. Fitzgerald, F. J. Pinto, K. Rosenfield, R. J. Siegel, E. M. Tuzcu, et al. American College of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (ivus): A report of the american college of cardiology task force on clinical expert consensus documents developed in collaboration with the european society of cardiology endorsed by the society of cardiac angiography and interventions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2001; 37(5): 1478 - 1492. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Okura, Y. Morino, A. Oshima, M. Hayase, M. R. Ward, J. J. Popma, R. E. Kuntz, H. N. Bonneau, P. G. Yock, and P. J. Fitzgerald Preintervention arterial remodeling affects clinical outcome following stenting: an intravascular ultrasound study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 15, 2001; 37(4): 1031 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F Schiele, M K Batur, M F Seronde, N Meneveau, P Sewoke, A Bassignot, G Couetdic, F Caulfield, and J-P Bassand Cytomegalovirus, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Helicobacter pylori IgG antibodies and restenosis after stent implantation: an angiographic and intravascular ultrasound study Heart, March 1, 2001; 85(3): 304 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Ward, P. S. Tsao, A. Agrotis, R. J. Dilley, G. L. Jennings, and A. Bobik Low Blood Flow After Angioplasty Augments Mechanisms of Restenosis : Inward Vessel Remodeling, Cell Migration, and Activity of Genes Regulating Migration Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, February 1, 2001; 21(2): 208 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Nissen and P. Yock Intravascular Ultrasound : Novel Pathophysiological Insights and Current Clinical Applications Circulation, January 30, 2001; 103(4): 604 - 616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Sierevogel, G. Pasterkamp, E. Velema, P. P. T. de Jaegere, B. J. G. L. de Smet, J. H. Verheijen, D. P. V. de Kleijn, and C. Borst Oral Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibition and Arterial Remodeling After Balloon Dilation : An Intravascular Ultrasound Study in the Pig Circulation, January 16, 2001; 103(2): 302 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M A Costa, K Kozuma, A L Gaster, W J van der Giessen, M Sabaté, D P Foley, I P Kay, J M R Ligthart, P Thayssen, M J van den Brand, et al. Three dimensional intravascular ultrasonic assessment of the local mechanism of restenosis after balloon angioplasty Heart, January 1, 2001; 85(1): 73 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sabate, M. A. Costa, K. Kozuma, I. P. Kay, C. J. van der Wiel, V. Verin, W. Wijns, P. W. Serruys, and on behalf of the Dose Finding Study Group Methodological and clinical implications of the relocation of the minimal luminal diameter after intracoronary radiation therapy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2000; 36(5): 1536 - 1541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Ward, G. Pasterkamp, A. C. Yeung, and C. Borst Arterial Remodeling : Mechanisms and Clinical Implications Circulation, September 5, 2000; 102(10): 1186 - 1191. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Takagi, K. Yoshida, T. Akasaka, S. Kaji, T. Kawamoto, Y. Honda, A. Yamamuro, T. Hozumi, and S. Morioka Hyperinsulinemia during oral glucose tolerance test is associated with increased neointimal tissue proliferation after coronary stent implantation in nondiabetic patients: A serial intravascular ultrasound study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2000; 36(3): 731 - 738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. G. L. de Smet, D. de Kleijn, R. Hanemaaijer, J. H. Verheijen, L. Robertus, Y. J. M. van der Helm, C. Borst, and M. J. Post Metalloproteinase Inhibition Reduces Constrictive Arterial Remodeling After Balloon Angioplasty : A Study in the Atherosclerotic Yucatan Micropig Circulation, June 27, 2000; 101(25): 2962 - 2967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Ahmed, G. S. Mintz, R. Waksman, N. J. Weissman, R. Mehran, A. D. Pichard, L. F. Satler, K. M. Kent, and M. B. Leon Safety of Intracoronary {gamma}-Radiation on Uninjured Reference Segments During the First 6 Months After Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis : A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Study Circulation, May 16, 2000; 101(19): 2227 - 2230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Serruys, D. P. Foley, B. Hofling, J. Puel, H. D. Glogar, R. Seabra-Gomes, J. Goicolea, P. Coste, W. Rutsch, H. Katus, et al. Carvedilol for Prevention of Restenosis After Directional Coronary Atherectomy : Final Results of the European Carvedilol Atherectomy Restenosis (EUROCARE) Trial Circulation, April 4, 2000; 101(13): 1512 - 1518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. G. Lehmann, J. J. Popma, J. A. Werner, A. J. Lansky, and R. L. Wilensky Vascular remodeling and the local delivery of cytochalasin B after coronary angioplasty in humans J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 1, 2000; 35(3): 583 - 591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Pasterkamp, D. P.V de Kleijn, and C. Borst Arterial remodeling in atherosclerosis, restenosis and after alteration of blood flow: potential mechanisms and clinical implications Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 2000; 45(4): 843 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Schoenhagen, K. M. Ziada, S. R. Kapadia, T. D. Crowe, S. E. Nissen, and E. M. Tuzcu Extent and Direction of Arterial Remodeling in Stable Versus Unstable Coronary Syndromes : An Intravascular Ultrasound Study Circulation, February 15, 2000; 101(6): 598 - 603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lindsay Jr., E. E. Pinnow, and A. D. Pichard Frequency of major adverse cardiac events within one month of coronary angioplasty: a useful measure of operator performance J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 1999; 34(7): 1916 - 1923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mehran, G. Dangas, A. S. Abizaid, G. S. Mintz, A. J. Lansky, L. F. Satler, A. D. Pichard, K. M. Kent, G. W. Stone, and M. B. Leon Angiographic Patterns of In-Stent Restenosis : Classification and Implications for Long-Term Outcome Circulation, November 2, 1999; 100(18): 1872 - 1878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.J. de Feyter Editorials: Lipids and coronary restenosis: an elusive link Eur. Heart J., October 1, 1999; 20(19): 1371 - 1374. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sabate, P. W. Serruys, W. J. van der Giessen, J. M.R. Ligthart, V. L.M.A. Coen, I. P. Kay, A. L. Gijzel, A. J. Wardeh, A. den Boer, and P. C. Levendag Geometric Vascular Remodeling After Balloon Angioplasty and {beta}-Radiation Therapy : A Three-Dimensional Intravascular Ultrasound Study Circulation, September 14, 1999; 100(11): 1182 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Gyongyosi, P Yang, A Hassan, F Weidinger, H Domanovits, A Laggner, and D Glogar Arterial remodelling of native human coronary arteries in patients with unstable angina pectoris: a prospective intravascular ultrasound study Heart, July 1, 1999; 82(1): 68 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Dangas, G. S. Mintz, R. Mehran, A. J. Lansky, R. Kornowski, A. D. Pichard, L. F. Satler, K. M. Kent, G. W. Stone, and M. B. Leon Preintervention Arterial Remodeling as an Independent Predictor of Target-Lesion Revascularization After Nonstent Coronary Intervention : An Analysis of 777 Lesions With Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging Circulation, June 22, 1999; 99(24): 3149 - 3154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. W. Bech, N. H. J. Pijls, B. De Bruyne, K. H. Peels, H. R. Michels, H. J. R. M. Bonnier, and J. J. Koolen Usefulness of Fractional Flow Reserve to Predict Clinical Outcome After Balloon Angioplasty Circulation, February 23, 1999; 99(7): 883 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Frimerman, P. J. Welch, X. Jin, N. Eigler, S. Yei, J. Forrester, H. Honda, R. Makkar, J. Barber, and F. Litvack Chimeric DNA-RNA Hammerhead Ribozyme to Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Reduces Stent-Induced Stenosis in a Porcine Coronary Model Circulation, February 9, 1999; 99(5): 697 - 703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Bates and J. I. Weitz Prevention of activation of blood coagulation during acute coronary ischemic syndromes: beyond aspirin and heparin Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 1999; 41(2): 418 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Cote, J.-C. Tardif, J. Lesperance, J. Lambert, M. Bourassa, R. Bonan, G. Gosselin, M. Joyal, J.-F. Tanguay, S. Nattel, et al. Effects of Probucol on Vascular Remodeling After Coronary Angioplasty Circulation, January 12, 1999; 99(1): 30 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. de Vrey, G. S. Mintz, C. von Birgelen, T. Kimura, M. Noboyoshi, J. J. Popma, P. W. Serruys, and M. B. Leon Serial volumetric (three-dimensional) intravascular ultrasound analysis of restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 1998; 32(7): 1874 - 1880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Thome, L. W. Gimple, B. G. Bachhuber, C. A. McNamara, M. Ragosta, S. D. Gertz, E. R. Powers, G. K. Owens, J. E. Humphries, and I. J. Sarembock Early Plus Delayed Hirudin Reduces Restenosis in the Atherosclerotic Rabbit More Than Early Administration Alone : Potential Implications for Dosing of Antithrombin Agents Circulation, November 24, 1998; 98(21): 2301 - 2306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Oshima, D. Itchhaporia, and P. Fitzgerald New developments in intravascular ultrasound Vascular Medicine, November 1, 1998; 3(4): 281 - 290. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Sharma, S. Duvvuri, G. Dangas, A. Kini, R. Vidhun, K. Venu, J. A. Ambrose, and J. D. Marmur Rotational atherectomy for in-stent restenosis: acute and long-term results of the first 100 cases J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1998; 32(5): 1358 - 1365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Lansky, G. S. Mintz, J. J. Popma, A. D. Pichard, K. M. Kent, L. F. Satler, D. S. Baim, R. E. Kuntz, C. Simonton, R. M. Bersin, et al. Remodeling after directional coronary atherectomy (with and without adjunct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty): a serial angiographic and intravascular ultrasound analysis from the optimal atherectomy restenosis study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 1998; 32(2): 329 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B.J.G.L de Smet, J van der Zande, Y.J.M van der Helm, R.E Kuntz, C Borst, and M.J Post The atherosclerotic Yucatan animal model to study the arterial response after balloon angioplasty: the natural history of remodeling Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 1998; 39(1): 224 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kakuta, M. Usui, W. D. Coats Jr, J. W. Currier, F. Numano, and D. P. Faxon Arterial Remodeling at the Reference Site After Angioplasty in the Atherosclerotic Rabbit Model Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, January 1, 1998; 18(1): 47 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Sierevogel, E. Velema, P. P. de Jaegere, D. P. de Kleijn, C. Borst, and G. Pasterkamp Minimal Duration of Oral Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibition to Prevent Constrictive Arterial Remodeling after Balloon Dilation in the Pig Radiology, February 1, 2002; 222(2): 468 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |