(Circulation. 1997;96:448-453.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Fourth Department of Internal Medicine (T.A., K.T., K.O., H.Y., K.N., Y.M., K.S., T.S., S.M.) and the Emergency Unit (R.M.), Shimane Medical University, Izumo, Japan; and Osaka University School of Medicine (S.B.), Suita, Japan.
Correspondence to Kazuaki Tanabe, MD, The Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Shimane Medical University, 89-1 Enya-cho, Izumo 693, Japan.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results The study population consisted of 24 patients with anterior AMI. All patients underwent MCE shortly after reflow and in the chronic stage (a mean of 31 days after reflow). Wall motion score (WMS) was determined as the sum of 16 segmental scores (dyskinetic/akinetic=3 to normal=0) at days 1 and 31. Gradient-echo acquisition and gadolinium-DTPAenhanced spin-echo MRI were performed within 10 days after reflow. In MCE shortly after reflow, 16 patients (67%) showed contrast enhancement and the other 8 patients (33%) showed a sizable contrast defect. In the chronic stage, a persistent contrast defect was observed in 7 of 8 patients with a contrast defect shortly after reflow. Consistent contrast enhancement was observed in 12 of 16 patients (75%) with contrast enhancement shortly after reflow, indicating that a contrast defect newly appeared in 4 patients (25%). Intramyocardial hemorrhage was detected in 9 patients (38%): 5 of 7 patients with a persistent contrast defect and in all 4 patients with a new appearance of a contrast defect during the chronic stage. The patients without hemorrhage showed a significant improvement in WMS compared with patients with hemorrhage at day 31 (5±5 versus 19±6, P<.0005).
Conclusions These results suggest that irreversible microvascular damage to the ischemic myocardium may cause intramyocardial hemorrhage after reflow, associated with impaired recovery of left ventricular function. Contrast enhancement within the risk area shortly after reflow does not necessarily indicate long-term microvascular salvage.
Key Words: myocardial infarction microcirculation magnetic resonance imaging
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Intramyocardial hemorrhage is a phenomenon that reflects severe microvascular injury, resulting in extravasation of erythrocytes into reperfused myocardium.18 19 20 Regardless of whether hemorrhage occurs only in the area of the myocardium already irreversibly injured and predisposed to necrosis, the presence of hemorrhage can be used as a marker for reperfusion injury. Shishido et al21 demonstrated in a canine experiment that intramyocardial hemorrhage caused by reperfusion expands gradually after reperfusion, suggesting that the coronary microvascular damage may progress for several hours after coronary reflow. However, the relationship between microvascular damage and intramyocardial hemorrhage has not yet been established in clinical settings. Recent studies have demonstrated the usefulness of MRI for detecting and quantifying the postreperfusion intramyocardial hemorrhage.22 23 24 25
In this study, we examined the relationship between temporal changes in myocardial perfusion patterns detected by MCE (shortly after coronary reflow and about 1 month after reflow) and intramyocardial hemorrhage detected by MRI in patients with anterior AMI.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 flow); (2) no
significant stenosis in the other coronary arteries
(single-vessel disease); (3) adequate two-dimensional
echocardiographic images; (4) coronary balloon
angioplasty performed within 24 hours after the onset of chest pain;
and (5) patency of the infarct-related artery (TIMI grade 3 flow) on
coronary angiograms taken shortly after coronary reflow
and in the chronic stage (
1 month after reflow). Patients with late
reperfusion (
6 hours after the onset) were included in the study
population. The diagnosis of AMI was based on chest pain lasting
30
minutes, ST-segment elevation
2 mm in two contiguous ECG leads,
and a greater than threefold increase in serum creatine kinase.
Informed consent was obtained from each patient by one of the
investigators.
Protocol
Catheterization was performed via the femoral
approach in the acute stage of myocardial infarction. Each patient
rested in the supine position. After completion of
diagnostic coronary angiography, two-dimensional
echocardiography was performed to assess the
regional wall motion abnormalities before coronary reflow.
Two-dimensional echocardiographic images were obtained
with a commercially available phased-array system (EUB-555, Hitachi)
with a 3.5-MHz transducer. Images were recorded on 1.25-cm
videotape with an S-VHS recorder (AG-7355, Panasonic).
Intracoronary nitroglycerin was given to reverse epicardial vasospasm. Coronary balloon angioplasty was performed after the administration of heparin (10 000 to 13 000 units). We did not use thrombolytic agents such as urokinase or tissue plasminogen activator. All patients were given aspirin (81 mg/d) and low-dose heparin (5000 to 10 000 units/d).
MCE was performed about 20 minutes after successful coronary
reflow confirmed by coronary angiogram. Two milliliters of
sonicated albumin containing microbubbles was injected into the
left coronary artery for MCE. Imaging of the apical long-axis
view was recorded on videotape, starting at
5 seconds before
injection of the contrast agent and lasting until the contrast
enhancement was no longer evident with a constant gain setting. After
completion of contrast injection into the left coronary artery,
the contrast injection was performed into the right coronary
artery and the apical long-axis view was recorded. MCE was repeated
at least twice on the same view to assess reproducibility. The lead II
ECG was continuously monitored during and after MCE.
In all patients, MRI was performed between day 2 and day 10 (mean, day 6) after coronary reflow with a SIGNA 1.5-Tesla system (General Electric). ECG-gated gradient-echo acquisition (flip angle=30 degrees) and Gd-DTPAenhanced spin-echo MRI were applied for imaging of the heart with the multislice technique (echo time=15 ms, repetition time=RR interval of the ECG). Short-axis images were obtained from apex to base with 7-mm thickness and 3-mm gap. A matrix of 256x192 was used for acquisition, and images were displayed with a 256x256 matrix. The field of view was 320 mm. The fat suppression technique was performed with the use of frequency-selective presaturation. After gradient-echo acquisition and baseline spin-echo MRI scans were performed, a bolus of 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA was injected intravenously. The images were obtained 10 minutes after Gd-DTPA injection.
Coronary angiography and MCE were repeated at a mean of 31 days (21 to 50 days) after reflow. MCE was performed in the same fashion as in the acute stage. All patients underwent two-dimensional echocardiographic examination at days 1 and 31 after coronary reflow; echocardiographic images were recorded on videotape. Left ventricular regional wall motion was identified either with three longitudinal views (parasternal long-axis, apical four-chamber, apical two-chamber) or three short-axis views (mitral valve level, papillary muscle level, apical level). The left ventricle was divided into 16 segments according to the definition of the American Society of Echocardiography, and wall motion in each segment was evaluated as follows: 3, dyskinetic/akinetic; 2, severe hypokinetic; 1, hypokinetic; and 0, normal. The wall motion score, determined by two independent observers, was represented as the total of scores for each of the 16 segments. In cases of disagreement, a consensus was established with the third observer.
Analysis of MCE Data
Images recorded on videotape were analyzed with the
use of an off-line computer system. Abnormal regional wall motion area
(dyskinetic, akinetic, severely hypokinetic, and hypokinetic) on the
apical long-axis view of the left ventricle was defined as the risk
area in echocardiography before coronary
reflow. The patients were divided into two groups on the basis of the
presence or absence of regional contrast defects within the risk area
by MCE performed shortly after reflow and during the chronic stage,
respectively. A patchy contrast opacification was not considered a
contrast defect in this study.
Analysis of MRI
The patient classification of the presence or absence of
intramyocardial hemorrhage was based on the results of the MRI.
We considered a low signal intensity area within the risk area by
gradient-echo acquisition MRI and a low signal intensity area within a
high signal intensity zone by Gd-DTPAenhanced spin-echo MRI as a
marker of intramyocardial hemorrhage (Fig 1
). Because gradient-echo acquisition MRI was
not performed in 4 of 24 patients, only the results of
Gd-DTPAenhanced spin-echo MRI were used in the 4 patients. In
contrast, 1 patient was examined only by gradient-echo acquisition MRI
because of an allergy to Gd-DTPA.
|
Statistical Analysis
All data are expressed as mean±SD. Parameters were
compared with the use of commercially available statistical software
(StatView, Abacus Concepts). Comparisons between two groups were made
with the use of a Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact
probability test. Comparisons between results of the initial and
delayed studies were made with the use of a Wilcoxon signed
rank test. Analysis of the relationship between contrast defect
and intramyocardial hemorrhage was performed with the use of
Fisher's exact probability test. Differences were considered
significant at P<.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Intramyocardial Hemorrhage Detected by MRI
In this study, there was no discrepancy between the findings of
gradient-echo acquisition imaging and Gd-DTPAenhanced spin-echo
imaging in 19 patients who were examined by both methods.
Intramyocardial hemorrhage within the risk area was detected by
MRI in 9 of the 24 patients (38%). The Table
summarizes
characteristics of patients with and without intramyocardial
hemorrhage. There were no differences
in age, time from onset to reperfusion, or angiographic collateral
grade between patients with and without intramyocardial
hemorrhage except for peak serum creatinine
phosphokinase and the incidence of Q-wave infarction. All
intramyocardial hemorrhage was observed in patients with
Q-wave infarction and not observed in patients with nonQ-wave
infarction.
|
Changes in the wall motion score between the initial and follow-up
echocardiographic studies are summarized in Fig 2
. There was no difference in the wall motion
score between patients with and those without intramyocardial
hemorrhage (21±4 versus 20±5, NS) at day 1 after
coronary reflow. The patients without intramyocardial
hemorrhage showed a significantly greater improvement in the
wall motion score compared with those with intramyocardial
hemorrhage at day 31 after coronary reflow (5±5 versus
19±6, P<.0005).
|
Microvascular Damage Detected by MCE
Before coronary reflow, the risk area in the anterior
interventricular septum, anterior free wall, and apex was
clearly defined as an abnormal regional wall motion area in all study
patients. The area of a residual contrast defect was always clearly
defined and reproducible.
Significant contrast enhancement was observed within the predetermined
risk area shortly after coronary reflow in 16 of the 24
patients (67%). In comparison, a sizable contrast defect was noted in
8 patients (33%) shortly after coronary reflow. In the chronic
stage, MCE revealed a persistent contrast defect in 7 of the 8 patients
who had the contrast defect shortly after coronary reflow. The
contrast defect disappeared in the 1 remaining patient at the later
examination. In the chronic stage, consistent contrast
enhancement was observed in only 12 of the 16 patients with contrast
enhancement shortly after coronary reflow, indicating that the
contrast defect newly appeared in 4 patients (Fig 3
). Fig 4
shows temporal changes of
myocardial contrast echocardiograms in a patient with progressive
microvascular damage. The contrast defect was
observed in 10 of the 15 patients with Q-wave infarction and in only 1
of the 9 patients with nonQ-wave infarction in the chronic stage. The
contrast defect was observed in 43% of patients reperfused within 3
hours and in 47% of patients reperfused >3 hours in the chronic
stage.
|
|
Microvascular Damage and Intramyocardial Hemorrhage
Fig 3
also shows the relationship between temporal changes in
contrast defects detected by MCE and intramyocardial hemorrhage
detected by MRI after coronary reflow. Intramyocardial
hemorrhage was detected in 5 of the 7 patients with a
persistent contrast defect and in all patients with a new appearance of
a contrast defect during the chronic stage. On the other hand,
intramyocardial hemorrhage was not found in the patients
without a contrast defect during the chronic stage. Therefore, the
presence of a contrast defect during the chronic stage was closely
related to the presence of intramyocardial hemorrhage.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Intramyocardial Hemorrhage After Coronary Reflow
MRI can characterize the tissue on the basis of changes in
relaxation times T1 and T2, which are reflected as changes in image
signal intensity. It is well known that MRI is useful for detecting
intracranial hemorrhage.26 27 28 Gradient-echo
acquisition MRI depicts hemorrhage as a low signal intensity
area caused by paramagnetic susceptibility effect of
deoxyhemoglobin.
Recently, it was reported that MRI may provide a noninvasive method for detecting and quantifying intramyocardial hemorrhage.22 23 24 25 Gd-DTPAenhanced MRI depicts intramyocardial hemorrhage as a low signal intensity area within a high signal intensity zone. Therefore, we used gradient-echo acquisition MRI and Gd-DTPAenhanced spin-echo MRI to detect intramyocardial hemorrhage in this study. Fujiwara et al29 studied 30 autopsied hearts after thrombolytic therapy. They found that intramyocardial hemorrhage increased gradually after thrombolysis, became moderately or markedly diffuse after 4 hours, and was replaced by fibrosis after 3 to 4 weeks in humans. Therefore, we performed MRI between day 2 and day 10 after coronary reflow.
Although the incidence of intramyocardial hemorrhage after reperfusion was reported in animal preparations19 30 31 and autopsy hearts,29 32 its incidence in the surviving patients with reperfused AMI remains unclear. Our data revealed that 38% of the patients with anterior AMI after coronary reflow had intramyocardial hemorrhage. However, Waller et al33 demonstrated that necropsy patients who were treated with angioplasty alone had nonhemorrhagic infarction. The reason for this discrepancy may be related to the time differences in coronary reflow after symptoms became apparent.
Microvascular Damage After Coronary Reflow
Contrast enhancement after coronary reflow reflects the
degree of impairment in microvascular function. Coronary reflow
as assessed by angiography is not necessarily associated with
myocardial contrast enhancement. This condition has been characterized
as the no-reflow phenomenon.12 In our study, 8 of the 24
patients had no-reflow shortly after coronary reflow. Although
the mechanism of this phenomenon is not clear,34 35 36 37 it has
been associated with extensive myocardial necrosis and microvascular
damage. However, in 1 of the 8 patients with a contrast defect shortly
after coronary reflow, the contrast defect disappeared during
the acute to late stage, indicating the improvement of microvascular
function. In canine experiments, Bolli et al38 and Triana
and Bolli39 documented that the reversible
ischemic insult causes prolonged microvascular dysfunction
associated with an increase in resting vascular resistance and
impairment in vasodilator response. This phenomenon was characterized
as microvascular stunning. In our study, 5 of the 7 patients with a
persistent contrast defect had intramyocardial hemorrhage,
whereas 1 patient in whom the contrast defect disappeared showed no
intramyocardial hemorrhage and achieved left
ventricular function recovery. This suggests that
microvascular stunning may partially explain the reversibility of
microvascular function in humans.
Ito et al16 demonstrated that 7 of 30 patients (23%) with MCE reflow showed a decrease in contrast intensity during the acute to late stage. Lim et al17 also demonstrated that 4 of 20 patients (20%) with MCE reflow had a late reappearance of a contrast defect. The exact mechanism for the late reappearance of the contrast defect could not be explained. Ambrosio et al14 showed that the no-reflow area could expand late and that the phenomenon was associated with neutrophil accumulation and capillary plugging late in the course of reperfusion. Kloner et al40 also showed the progressive deterioration in coronary vascular reserve, which may be related to neutrophil influx. Recently, Shishido et al21 demonstrated in a canine experiment that intramyocardial hemorrhage caused by reperfusion gradually expands from endocardium to epicardium after reperfusion and was almost consistent with the contrast defect area by MCE. In our study, 4 of the 16 patients (25%) without a contrast defect shortly after coronary reflow showed the late appearance of the contrast defect. These patients had intramyocardial hemorrhage, and left ventricular function recovery was worse compared with patients who had contrast enhancement throughout the convalescent stage. Therefore, it is possible that microvascular damage that leads to intramyocardial hemorrhage may progress after coronary reflow.
Limitations of Our Study
The definition of intramyocardial hemorrhage was based on
the MRI findings without the histological data. The
sensitivity and specificity of our MRI technique to diagnose
intramyocardial hemorrhage is not strictly examined because of
the small number of autopsies. Lotan et al24 reported that
MRI was able to detect intramyocardial hemorrhage as zones of
decreased signal intensity in 13 of the 14 dogs (93%) with macroscopic
hemorrhage. In 1 dog with macroscopic hemorrhage in
which MRI failed to detect reduced signal intensity zones, only a small
hemorrhage was observed. Therefore, we believe that our MRI
technique has almost the same sensitivity and specificity to diagnose
intramyocardial hemorrhage.
Contrast enhancement can be influenced by several factors, including the size and number of microbubbles injected, the injection volume of the contrast medium, and factors affecting ultrasonic reflection such as gain setting, depth of penetration, incident angle, axial and lateral resolution, gray scale compression, and nonlinearity of echo amplitude. The timing of MCE immediately after coronary reflow is another factor that affects the size of the contrast defect.41 In this study, the same echo plane and same intracoronary injection volume of the sonicated albumin were used to determine the presence or absence of a contrast defect. We could not predict the appearance of intramyocardial hemorrhage after reperfusion because of the small size of the study population. Further studies are necessary to determine the factors that may predict the ultimate outcome of coronary revascularization in the acute stage.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received November 18, 1996; revision received January 24, 1997; accepted February 2, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Kawamoto, H. Iwasaki, K. Kusano, T. Murayama, A. Oyamada, M. Silver, C. Hulbert, M. Gavin, A. Hanley, H. Ma, et al. CD34-Positive Cells Exhibit Increased Potency and Safety for Therapeutic Neovascularization After Myocardial Infarction Compared With Total Mononuclear Cells Circulation, November 14, 2006; 114(20): 2163 - 2169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. van den Bos, T. Baks, A. D. Moelker, W. Kerver, R.-J. van Geuns, W. J. van der Giessen, D. J. Duncker, and P. A. Wielopolski Magnetic resonance imaging of haemorrhage within reperfused myocardial infarcts: possible interference with iron oxide-labelled cell tracking? Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2006; 27(13): 1620 - 1626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gick, N. Jander, H.-P. Bestehorn, R.-P. Kienzle, M. Ferenc, K. Werner, T. Comberg, K. Peitz, D. Zohlnhofer, V. Bassignana, et al. Randomized Evaluation of the Effects of Filter-Based Distal Protection on Myocardial Perfusion and Infarct Size After Primary Percutaneous Catheter Intervention in Myocardial Infarction With and Without ST-Segment Elevation Circulation, September 6, 2005; 112(10): 1462 - 1469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Krombach, C. B. Higgins, M. Chujo, and M. Saeed Gadomer-enhanced MR Imaging in the Detection of Microvascular Obstruction: Alleviation with Nicorandil Therapy Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 510 - 518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. R. Edelman Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging of the Heart: Overview of the Literature Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 653 - 668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kaul and H. Ito Microvasculature in Acute Myocardial Ischemia: Part II: Evolving Concepts in Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment Circulation, January 27, 2004; 109(3): 310 - 315. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Reffelmann, S. L. Hale, J. S. Dow, and R. A. Kloner No-Reflow Phenomenon Persists Long-Term After Ischemia/Reperfusion in the Rat and Predicts Infarct Expansion Circulation, December 9, 2003; 108(23): 2911 - 2917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nishino, H.-J. Youn, D. Gheorghevici, C. Zellner, T. M. Chou, K. Sudhir, and R. F. Redberg Effect of Intracoronary Estradiol on Postischemic Microvascular Damage in a Porcine Model: A Myocardial Contrast Echocardiographic Study Angiology, November 1, 2003; 54(6): 701 - 709. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L A Pierard Assessing perfusion and function in acute myocardial infarction: how and when? Heart, July 1, 2003; 89(7): 701 - 703. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Galiuto, A Lombardo, A Maseri, L Santoro, I Porto, D Cianflone, A G Rebuzzi, and F Crea Temporal evolution and functional outcome of no reflow: sustained and spontaneously reversible patterns following successful coronary recanalisation Heart, July 1, 2003; 89(7): 731 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Genda, T. Miura, T. Miki, Y. Ichikawa, and K. Shimamoto KATP channel opening is an endogenous mechanism of protection against the no-reflow phenomenon but its function is compromised by hypercholesterolemia J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 2, 2002; 40(7): 1339 - 1346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Reffelmann and R. A. Kloner Microvascular reperfusion injury: rapid expansion of anatomic no reflow during reperfusion in the rabbit Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2002; 283(3): H1099 - H1107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E Eeckhout and M.J Kern The coronary no-reflow phenomenon: a review of mechanisms and therapies Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2001; 22(9): 729 - 739. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Saeed New Concepts in Characterization of Ischemically Injured Myocardium by MRI Experimental Biology and Medicine, May 1, 2001; 226(5): 367 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. Brochet, D. Czitrom, D. Karila-Cohen, P. Seknadji, M. Faraggi, H. Benamer, P. Aubry, P. G. Steg, and P. Assayag Early changes in myocardial perfusion patterns after myocardial infarction: relation with contractile reserve and functional recovery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 1998; 32(7): 2011 - 2017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |