(Circulation. 1997;96:4095-4103.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (P.L.), and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (D.E., S.S.).
Correspondence to Peter Libby, MD, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 221 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail plibby{at}bustoff.bwh.harvard.edu
Key Words: endothelium leukocytes muscle, smooth risk factors viruses
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At a recent Special Emphasis Panel convened by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, a number of experts reviewed the evidence for links between infectious processes and atherosclerosis and restenosis. This report will summarize and examine critically the evidence for involvement of infectious agents in arterial diseases based on the deliberations of this expert panel. It will also highlight some of the unanswered questions in this area that may warrant further investigation.
Many reports of associations between a wide variety of infectious agents and atherosclerosis have recently appeared. An exhaustive evaluation of each of these purported associations lies beyond the scope of this survey. Rather, we will concentrate particularly on two particular infectious agents, one viral and one bacterial, currently linked with atherogenesis and supported by emerging evidence. Specifically, this report will focus primarily on herpesviruses, particularly cytomegalovirus (CMV), as an example of a viral agent and Chlamydia pneumoniae (C pneumoniae, also known as the TWAR strain on the basis of its original laboratory designation) as an example of a bacterial pathogen. Although the preponderance of recent studies have examined CMV and Chlamydia, the focus of this report on these more fully developed examples in no way excludes the possibility that similar principles may apply to other infectious agents.
| Evidence Supporting Involvement of Infectious Agents in Atherosclerosis and Restenosis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
In the realm of restenosis after coronary interventional therapy, recent evidence suggests an association between previous CMV infection and restenosis. Quantitative coronary arteriography documented a greater reduction in minimum luminal diameter at the sites of coronary atherectomy in patients seropositive for CMV than in seronegative patients.5 According to the criteria established by these investigators, 43% of seropositive versus 8% of seronegative patients developed angiographically definable restenosis (P<.002). Interestingly, the risk for restenosis correlated with IgG antibody rather than IgM antibody, and IgG levels did not vary between the primary intervention and follow-up angiogram, indicating prior infection rather than acute CMV infection as the risk factor for restenosis.
In the special case of accelerated arteriosclerosis
developing in the coronary arteries of transplanted hearts,
some seroepidemiological evidence also suggests an association with CMV
infection. In the Stanford experience, cardiac transplant recipients
who developed CMV infection, determined by a fourfold rise in IgG
antibody, more frequently developed angiographically detectable graft
arteriosclerosis than did patients without
serological evidence of CMV infection.6 At 6 years after
transplantation, the actuarial rate of development of >70% luminal
narrowing was <10% in the patients without evidence for CMV infection
versus
30% for those with evidence for CMV infection
(P<.05). Independent studies from other centers have also
linked CMV infection with transplantation
arteriosclerosis.79
The foregoing examples provide evidence for a potential association between CMV infection and arterial disease. However, not all such studies support an association between CMV and allograft arteriosclerosis.10 Such discrepancies point to some of the challenges of interpreting such seroepidemiological studies. Because infections with Herpesviridae, including CMV, are very common, many individuals in the general population will exhibit antibody titers suggestive of prior infection with these agents, including CMV. Conversely, many patients with documented arterial diseases will lack high titers of antibodies directed against these viruses. Thus, these data do not prove a causal relationship between infection with these viruses and arterial diseases.
Other limitations of these seroepidemiological studies include the relatively small numbers of patients enrolled in studies at any one center. Issues regarding the specificity and sensitivity of the antibody techniques used apply in such surveys. Often, the agents and methods used vary from center to center, making it difficult to compile the results obtained in various studies to increase the power of the analysis. Moreover, a bias exists against publication of negative studies, which may favor appearance in the literature of positive reports.
| Chlamydia |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The various seroepidemiological studies correlating various serological indexes of chlamydial infection with atherosclerosis have been for the most part descriptive (eg, cross-sectional) rather than analytical (eg, with a prospective cohort or case-control design). For this reason, the literature to date suffices to suggest hypotheses but cannot establish a causal relationship. A publication bias favoring positive studies must be taken into account when the existing database is evaluated. Moreover, descriptive studies generally do not control for certain confounding variables. For example, smoking, a risk factor for coronary heart disease events, may predispose to C pneumoniae infection and contribute to elevated titers of antibody to this organism.15
Studies Localizing Infectious Agents to Human Arterial
Lesions (Table
)
Herpesviridae, Including CMV
Despite attempts over many decades, it has been difficult to
culture Herpesviridae from human atheroma.2
However, failure to culture infectious virus particles from the lesions
does not preclude their involvement in aspects of the pathogenesis of
the disease. There are well-documented instances of "hit-and-run"
mechanisms of herpes-mediated disease in which the viruses trigger the
disease without persisting in an infectious form in the affected
tissue.16 Indeed, a variety of subsequent studies from many
centers have documented the presence of CMV or herpes simplex virus,
nucleic acid, and/or antigen in human atheroma (reviewed in
Reference 22 ). Landmark studies along these lines include demonstration
of herpes simplex virus nucleic acid sequences in human intimal lesions
by Benditt et al17 and work from Bruggeman's laboratory
that showed more frequent detection of CMV genomic DNA by polymerase
chain reaction amplification in atherosclerotic specimens than in
nonatherosclerotic arteries.18 Interestingly, the
prevalence of detection of CMV genome by this technique exceeded 50%
in the uninvolved arteries, compared with 90% in
atheromatous vessels, showing considerable overlap in
nonatherosclerotic and atherosclerotic specimens. Direct DNA blotting
analysis of these same specimens showed CMV DNA in
50% of
either atherosclerotic or uninvolved arteries. CMV nucleic acids have
also been localized in coronary
arteriosclerotic lesions in transplanted
hearts.19 Attempts to recover CMV RNA transcripts from
human atherosclerotic specimens, however, have proved
unsuccessful.20 In contrast, CMV DNA is commonly found in
the human arterial tree.21,22
| Chlamydia |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4%).29 The recovery of these organisms by culture,
however, has been much less successful.30
Evidence for Presence of Other Infectious Agents in Human
Arterial Lesions
As noted above, over the years many individual potential pathogens
have been implicated in the pathogenesis of
atherosclerosis. Sporadic reports of the presence of
such organisms in atheroma exist. A notable recent addition
to the list of potential pathogens includes Helicobacter
species.31
Animal Studies Implicating Infectious Agents in
Atherosclerosis
|
Herpesviridae, Including CMV (Table |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CMV infection enhances the neointimal response to balloon injury in rats. Moreover, in experimental heart transplantation in rats, infection with rat CMV causes subendothelial inflammation, endothelial activation (defined by class II major histocompatibility antigen expression), and increased intimal thickening and promotes the development of allograft arteriosclerosis.35,36
Animal Evidence Linking Chlamydia With
Arterial Disease (Table
)
The published literature contains only minimal data supporting a
role for C pneumoniae infection in animal models of
atherosclerosis. Repeated inoculation of genetically
hyperlipidemic rabbits (the Watanabe strain) has
resulted in lung abnormalities but no alteration in the aortic
atherosclerosis that develops in this
strain.37 Moreover, attempts to isolate C
pneumoniae and immunocytochemical detection of chlamydial antigen
or polymerase chain reaction evidence for chlamydial nucleic acid in
the aorta were unrevealing. After intranasal infection of mice with
C pneumoniae, detection of organisms was much more frequent
in the atheromatous aortas of
atherosclerosis-susceptible apolipoprotein Edeficient
mice than in the aortas of wild type strains.38
Possible Pathophysiological Mechanisms of
Infectious Agents in Atherosclerosis and
Restenosis Based on In Vitro Observations
| Direct Infection of Cultured Cells |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chlamydial infection of cells involved in atherogenesis.C pneumoniae, an obligate intracellular parasite, commonly infects mononuclear phagocytes. Macrophages, derived from monocytes, characteristically localize in human atherosclerotic plaques. Data regarding the biology of Chlamydia infection of vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells are scant.44 However, Chlamydia species can infect epithelial cells persistently under certain conditions. Under normal circumstances, the life cycle of Chlamydia involves two developmental forms, the elementary body and the replicative form, the reticulate body. Treatment of the continuous cell line HeLa 229 with the cytokine gamma interferon renders these cells susceptible to a persistent infection with C trachomatis.4547 Thus, infection with Chlamydia need not result in a lethal infection but may cause a chronic persistent and nonlytic infection of cells. The susceptibility of macrophages and vascular wall cells to persistent infection by C pneumoniae remains unknown.
| Effects of Infection and Microbial Products on Vascular Cell Functions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Effects on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis. Numerous studies have addressed changes in procoagulant and anticoagulant functions of endothelial cells infected by viruses.4853 For example, herpes simplex virus infection of endothelial cells augments the surface expression of tissue factor, a potent procoagulant.54 This and other effects of herpesvirus do not require a productive infection. CMV infection likewise induces endothelial cell procoagulant activity.41,49,55 Infections with viruses can alter other aspects of the ability of endothelial cells to maintain blood in an unclotted state. These effects include inhibition of plasminogen activator, reduced levels of endothelial thrombomodulin, and loss of heparin sulfate proteoglycan, among other factors that regulate thrombosis.56 Little information exists regarding the effects of Chlamydia infection on the regulation of endothelial cell functions related to blood clotting. Like other Gram-negative bacteria, Chlamydia species release a lipopolysaccharide endotoxin. The ability of C pneumoniaderived lipopolysaccharide to activate endothelial functions that promote blood clotting, as in the case of Escherichia coliderived endotoxin, remains unknown.
Ability of infectious agents to alter growth of vascular smooth muscle cells. The quest for Herpesviridae in human atheroma emerged from the concept that proliferation of a single virally transformed smooth muscle cell could account for the apparently monoclonal expansion of these cells in arteriosclerotic lesions.57,58 Indeed, herpesvirus can transform rabbit aortic smooth muscle cells. Such cell lines can become "immortalized," in the cell biologist's parlance, and thus escape usual growth control mechanisms.59
Recent evidence has suggested another specific manner in which CMV might influence arterial lesions. CMV infection can result in cytoplasmic sequestration of the tumor suppressor p53, perhaps because of complex formation with the viral immediate early gene product IE84.60 Infection with human CMV protects human endothelial cells from apoptosis resulting from serum lack.61 In this manner, CMV-infected vascular cells might evade a usual check on proliferation.
Few or no data in the literature support a role for bacterial infection, including C pneumoniae, in the modulation of vascular cell growth or transformation.
Effects of infectious agents on lipid metabolism. Infection of chickens with Marek's disease virus promotes cholesterol accumulation in the arterial wall. Herpes simplex virus infection decreases lysosomal hydrolysis of cholesterol esters by the acidic cholesteryl ester hydrolase in vascular smooth muscle cells.39,62,63 Herpesvirus infection also decreases the production of prostacyclin and other arachidonic acid metabolites. The consequent reduction in adenyl cyclase activity and cAMP concentration lowers the activity of protein kinase A, decreases the activity of the cytoplasmic cholesteryl ester hydrolase, and promotes accumulation of intracellular cholesteryl esters.63 Little evidence supports a role for infection by bacteria, including C pneumoniae, in the modulation of lipid metabolism in vascular cells.
Alteration of cytokine and other mediator
production by infectious agents. Vascular cells, including
smooth muscle, endothelium, and leukocytes, commonly
found in atherosclerotic lesions can produce as well as respond to
cytokines.64 These protein mediators of
inflammation and immunity can alter many vascular functions related to
atherosclerosis and restenosis. CMV infection
in vitro can augment macrophage production of messenger
RNAs encoding the cytokines interleukin-1ß, tumor necrosis
factor-
, and macrophage-colonystimulating
factor.65 Likewise, infection of mononuclear cells by
Herpes simplex or Epstein-Barr virus augments cytokine
production.66 CMV can induce tumor necrosis
factor-
expression in human monocytes.67 CMV infection
can also alter cytokine production by
endothelial cells.68
Bacterial lipopolysaccharides are classic activators of cytokine production from mononuclear phagocytes as well as intrinsic vascular wall cells. Ample evidence supports the role of bacterial endotoxins as regulators of production of such cytokines as interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor from human vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells.6971 Most of these studies have used endotoxins derived from various strains of E coli. The effects of lipopolysaccharides derived from Chlamydia species has not been tested in this regard. This is an important issue, because the potent effects of E coliderived endotoxins on cellular activation cannot necessarily be extrapolated to lipopolysaccharides derived from other bacterial species.72
Induction of leukocyte adhesion molecules by infectious agents and their products. Interactions between leukocytes and the vascular endothelium participate in many forms of vascular disease, including aspects of atherogenesis. E coli endotoxin and cytokines typically released from endotoxin-stimulated cells augment the expression by endothelial cells of many of the adhesion molecules implicated in atherogenesis, including vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, and P-selectin. Similarly, infection of endothelial cells with CMV can induce the expression of endothelial-leukocyte adhesion molecules such as intercellular adhesion molecule-1.73 Endothelial cells infected with herpesvirus hominis express a monocyte receptor.74 By augmenting the expression of such leukocyte adhesion molecules, bacterial and viral infection could influence this crucial aspect of atherogenesis.
Systemic and Indirect Effects of Infectious Agents in Arterial
Diseases
In addition to the direct effects of infection and microbial
products on vascular functions, various systemic effects of
infection may influence atherogenesis and its manifestations (Fig 2
).
|
Potential effects of infections on atherogenesis mediated by the acute-phase response. The host response to infectious agents usually involves a change in the program of hepatic protein synthesis. The cytokine interleukin 6 may mediate much of this switch from production of "housekeeping" proteins, such as albumin, to greater synthesis of proteins collectively known as "acute-phase reactants," some of which may influence atherogenesis. Augmented production of fibrinogen and plasminogen activator inhibitor during the acute-phase response could promote thrombosis. Increased production of serum amyloid A protein can alter the potential function of HDL in cholesterol export from atheromatous lesions and in coronary risk.75 Also, systemic infections can decrease HDL cholesterol concentrations.76
Systemic infection and triggering of acute coronary events. An ample literature links infectious processes and acute myocardial infarction.77 The foregoing section examined ways in which the acute-phase response to such infections might promote atherogenesis or thrombosis. This section will examine how other aspects of the pathophysiology of acute infection might trigger acute coronary events. Physical disruption of atherosclerotic plaques commonly precipitates the acute coronary syndromes.78 Plaque disruption in turn depends on a balance of the anatomic substrate (the so-called "vulnerable" plaque) and the biomechanical forces brought to bear on the atheroma. Acute infections might alter these biomechanical variables. For example, the tachycardia and increased cardiac output that accompany many acute infections and febrile illnesses could increase the wall stress experienced by an atheromatous plaque. This could trigger coronary events by promoting disruption of vulnerable plaques.
Systemic endotoxemia and atherogenesis and acute coronary events. Bacterial endotoxins profoundly influence local functions of vascular wall cells. During Gram-negative bacterial sepsis, circulating endotoxin provokes profound alterations in physiology. In addition to hypotension and decreased systemic vascular resistance, endotoxemia diffusely activates the endothelium, promoting the development of the disseminated intravascular coagulation that commonly accompanies Gram-negative sepsis.79,80 Reduced cardiac perfusion due to the hypotension associated with sepsis and/or an augmented susceptibility to clot formation due to endothelial activation could also precipitate acute coronary events.80
Even if episodes of endotoxemia or systemic infection do not provoke acute coronary events, they may influence local vascular functions related to atheroma formation and evolution. We hypothesized that local "echos" of systemic endotoxemia or cytokinemia may evoke a wave of heightened local cytokine production in the atheroma by resident cells and macrophages.81,82 Experimental support for this notion derives from studies in which systemic administration of endotoxin to rabbits with diet-induced atheroma yielded increased cytokine gene expression in the aorta in relation to the amount of preexisting atheroma.81 In this manner, episodes of infectious illness could lead to a crisis in the evolution of atheroma-enhancing lesion development.
Indeed, serial angiographic studies indicate that human
atheromas do not progress linearly in time.83
Rather, these lesions appear to undergo periodic spurts of growth, as
determined by luminal encroachment on angiograms. Many of these
transient episodes of plaque enlargement may result from disruption and
healing. In some cases, systemic infections might promote these
episodes of plaque disruption by inflammatory or infectious activation
of vascular wall cells or lesional leukocytes (Figs 1
and 2
). In other
cases, the locally induced burst of cytokine production
due to infection might promote plaque growth even in the absence of
physical disruption.
| The Weight of the Evidence: Are Koch's Postulates Fulfilled? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Causative Organism Can Be Isolated From the Affected
Host
Attempts to culture infectious viruses from atheroma
have generally failed. Likewise, the propagation of C
pneumoniae from human atherosclerotic lesions is anecdotal. The
presence of antigens associated with these infectious agents and/or
nucleic acid characteristic of these agents is not an explicit
criterion of Koch's postulates. Although human atheromas
often contain such evidence of the presence of infectious agents, many
cases lack these indirect indications of the presence of the agents.
Moreover, even if infectious particles are present within the
lesions, a pathogenic role is far from established.
The Infectious Agent Can Be Identified by Culture or Directly
by Microscopy
In the case of CMV and Chlamydia, the agents are
extremely well characterized with a good deal of information about
their biology. This criterion is met not only in vitro but often in
situ within lesions, as noted above.
| On Transfer to a Susceptible Host, the Infectious Agent Must Produce the Disease |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It could be argued that Koch's postulates are irrelevant to a chronic disease that usually develops over decades. For example, previous infection with CMV or another virus could alter the function of cells permanently without persistence of the agents. Such a hit-and-run mechanism seems to apply to certain experimental tumors associated with herpesvirus infection. In contrast with the clarity of the epidemiological links between traditional risk factors for coronary heart disease (eg, hypercholesterolemia and hypertension), however, the evidence regarding involvement of Chlamydia and Herpesviridae in atherosclerosis remains rudimentary at present.
A possible instance in which an infectious agent could cause a disease without meeting Koch's postulates would be if it induced an immune response by antigenic mimicry. Another complexity not envisaged by Koch would be the dependence of the histocompatibility haplotype of an individual for susceptibility to infection. Particularly with viral agents, it is conceivable that only a subgroup of the population at large that had certain HLA haplotypes would be susceptible to the viral infection. This could explain lack of disease in some individuals exposed to the putative pathogen. Conversely, an equally vigorous argument to the contrary could be made. One could hold that herpesviruses, including CMV, are virtually ubiquitous. Their presence in atherosclerotic lesions may have no relationship whatsoever to disease production. Likewise, one could conceive that Chlamydia localizes more commonly in atherosclerotic lesions than in uninvolved arteries merely because of the presence of macrophages, which could harbor an innocent persistence of this common microbial pathogen.
Indeed, some combination of these contrasting situations could pertain to human atherosclerosis. In some cases, a viral arteritis could furnish the substrate for an atheroma, decisively setting the stage for its subsequent development, perhaps in combination with traditional risk factors such as hypercholesterolemia. The potentiating effect of an atherogenic diet from the development of arterial disease in chickens infected with the Marek's disease virus provides an example of such a mechanism. In the case of Chlamydia, persistent infection of lesional macrophages might potentiate atherogenesis by heightening cytokine and growth factor release from the phagocytic cells within the atheroma. Thus, the Chlamydia infection, although not a primary pathogenic stimulus, could hasten development of atheroma.
Although we must conclude that no infectious agent meets Koch's original postulates at present, we need not therefore discard the notion that infectious agents play a pivotal role in atherogenesis in some situations in which infections, when present, may promote the atherogenic process.84 Indeed, H pylori does not meet Koch's postulates as a causative organism for duodenal ulcer.85 Various workers have argued persuasively that Koch's postulates may lack sufficient sensitivity to reject a causal link between an infectious agent and a given disease.86
| Unanswered Questions and Areas for Future Research |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Laboratory Investigations of the Vascular Biology of Infectious
Agents in Relation to Atherogenesis and Restenosis
A great deal of in vitro work has probed potential mechanisms
whereby Herpesviridae, including herpesvirus hominis and CMV, can alter
the functions of vascular wall cells in ways that may promote
atherosclerosis or restenosis. Yet a number of
fundamental issues remain relatively unexplored. It is unknown how
herpesviruses enter the arterial wall. A potential
mechanism could involve entry into the artery wall, with blood
monocytes known to accumulate in these lesions. Under ordinary
circumstances, monocytes are minimally permissive for herpesvirus
infection. However, differentiation of mononuclear phagocytes toward
the macrophage phenotype by such agents as vitamin
D3 can augment virus yield from infected cells. The general
inability to culture herpesvirus from atheromatous
lesions may result from limited permissivity of vascular cells for
virus replication. However, in some otherwise nonpermissive cell types,
exposure to growth factors, such as fibroblast growth factor, can
enhance viral gene expression. Smooth muscle cells in atherosclerotic
lesions and in injured arteries may encounter fibroblast growth
factors. The interactions between growth factors and smooth muscle
cells might thus influence their interaction with herpesviruses in ways
that might be important to the evolution of vascular lesions. Systemic
factors might also influence the activity of latent herpesviruses in
atherosclerotic lesions. For example, glucocorticoids, hormones
released during stress, can enhance transcription of herpesvirus latent
in cells.87 Thus, a quiescent herpesvirus infection might
be reactivated by such a mechanism, much as glucocorticoids or
stress can reactivate latent Herpes zoster.
Although the interaction of herpesviruses, including CMV, in the artery wall has received much attention in the past, study of the vascular effects of Chlamydia has barely begun. Just as in the case of viruses, it is important to know how Chlamydia enter the artery wall. Could these agents enter in mononuclear phagocytes? Does the degree of differentiation of the mononuclear phagocyte or the stimuli that it may encounter in the vessel wall influence the latency of productivity of the infection? Specifically, would gamma interferon, a cytokine found within atheroma, favor a persistent infection of macrophages as in the case of certain transformed cell lines? What effects do the lipopolysaccharides produced by Chlamydia have on vessel wall cells and macrophages? Could major chlamydial proteins, such as the major outer membrane protein or heat shock protein, serve as antigens for a cellular or humoral immune response and thus add to the chronic immune response ongoing in atherosclerotic lesions?
Need for In Vivo Animal Models to Study the Interaction Between
Infectious Agents and Atherosclerosis
As described above, the scientific foundation of the relationship
between infection and atherosclerosis rests on the
convincing data emerging from the avian herpesvirus infection, Marek's
disease in chickens. Short of satisfying Koch's postulates in humans,
the notion that infectious agents can provoke or potentiate
arterial disease could benefit enormously from development
of further animal models, particularly in mammalian species.
The advent of genetically modified mice susceptible to atherosclerosis, such as those lacking apolipoprotein E or the low-density lipoprotein receptor, has ushered in a new era of animal investigation of atherosclerosis. These new animal models provide lesions that share many more features of human atherosclerosis than previously achievable in rodents. Although differences in species permissivity require consideration, attempts to study the interaction of infectious agents with atheroma formation in these novel animal preparations seems worthy. The ability to infect apolipoprotein Edeficient mice with C pneumoniae provides support for this particular avenue toward development of relevant animal models.38 Doubtless, other species would be appropriate for testing various hypotheses regarding the interaction of infectious agents and atherosclerosis and restenosis, including rabbits, swine, and nonhuman primates.
Clinical Studies Regarding Infectious Causes of
Atherosclerosis and Restenosis
A large database of seroepidemiological studies, reviewed above,
has established grounds for a clinically relevant link between
Chlamydia and CMV with atherosclerosis and,
in the case of CMV, with restenosis after angioplasty. In the
realm of seroepidemiological studies, increasing the number of surveys
of relatively small numbers of patients at a single center is not
likely to provide further illumination. Retrospective studies are
subject to well-known biases. Moreover, it is difficult to compare
results across various seroepidemiological studies because of
differences in reagents and assay protocols and in patient selection. A
standardized set of reagents, protocols, and perhaps a core testing
laboratory would facilitate future seroepidemiological studies. In
particular, studies of geographically diverse populations with
differing risks for atherosclerosis could provide new
insight in testing of the relationship between infectious diseases and
atherosclerosis. Ultimately, a well-designed and
sufficiently powered prospective cohort study relating evidence for
infection to future risk of cardiovascular disease and
controlling for confounding variables (eg, smoking) would help to
strengthen the seroepidemiological evidence for a causal role of
infectious agents in aggravating atherosclerotic disease. Use of stored
samples from previous clinical studies provides another potential
source of materials for further study in this context.
Some have proposed consideration of a clinical trial of antibiotic therapy after coronary events as end points. Such studies would test the hypothesis that bacterial agents such as Chlamydia, for which effective antibiotic therapies exist, contribute to coronary events. A number of outstanding issues require resolution before we embark on such therapeutic trials. Criteria for defining a subset of patients with evidence of Chlamydia infection would prove helpful in targeting individuals who enter into a secondary prevention trial. Questions regarding the dose, duration, and choice of antibiotic agent would require considerable deliberation. Likewise, vaccination might provide a way to limit infection with microbial or viral agents implicated in atherogenesis.
However, a therapeutic trial of antibiotics still would not establish a causal relationship between any particular infectious agent, eg, Chlamydia, and atherosclerosis. Nonspecific effects of the antibiotic agent used in such a trial might influence the outcome. For example, tetracyclines can inhibit metalloproteinases, which may contribute to acute coronary syndromes. Other unexpected or unknown effects of antibiotics might confound conclusions regarding causality even in a successful therapeutic trial. Moreover, most antibiotics target a number of microorganisms, rendering conclusions about the causal contribution of any one susceptible organism difficult. Yet, if antibiotic treatment or vaccination could reduce atherosclerotic events, the public health implications could be enormous; hence the need to keep an open mind and seek further information through continued research focused on the relationship between infectious agents and vascular diseases. Certainly, increased understanding of the basic vascular biology of infection in relation to arterial diseases and creation of relevant animal models would facilitate resolution of these issues.
| Summary and Assessment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The pressing question that remains unanswered is whether infections are a cause, a cofactor, or a commensal of no pathological import in the context of atheroma.88 Only further basic science and clinical research can shed light on this issue and promote a better understanding of the roles of infection in arterial disease. Perhaps such efforts will aid in the identification of a population appropriate for particular surveillance or a specific intervention such as antibiotic therapy.
Note added in proof
Since acceptance of this manuscript, Danesh et al published a
related review,89 and two intriguing preliminary studies
showing reduction in recurrent coronary events in patients treated with
macrolide antibiotics have appeared.90,91
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|