| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 1997;96:3766-3773.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
New Look to an Old Symptom: Angina Pectoris
From the Istituto di Cardiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (F.C.), and the Divisione di Cardiochirurgia, Università Tor Vergata (A.G.), Rome, Italy.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract Causes of Ischemic Cardiac...Angina Pectoris and Myocardial...Lack of Angina During...References |
|---|
Abstract At the turn of this century, it was proposed that ischemic cardiac pain might be related to distension of the ventricular wall ("mechanical hypothesis"). Three decades later, it was hypothesized that ischemic pain might be elicited by the intramyocardial release of pain-producing substances induced by ischemia ("chemical hypothesis"). Studies carried out in the past 10 years have given strong support to the chemical hypothesis, because they have consistently shown that adenosine is a mediator of ischemic cardiac pain. Adenosine-induced ischemic cardiac pain is mediated primarily by stimulation of A1 receptors located in cardiac nerve endings and is potentiated by substance P. Conversely, the magnitude and rate of left ventricular dilation during ischemia do not predict the severity of angina. It is worth noting, however, that stretching of epicardial coronary arteries appears to potentiate the severity of angina caused by myocardial ischemia. The nervous activity generated by myocardial ischemia is modulated in intrinsic cardiac, mediastinal, and thoracic ganglia. Then it is further modulated in the central nervous system and projects bilaterally to the cortex, as demonstrated in humans by positron emission tomography, where it is decoded as a painful sensation. The causes responsible for the lack of angina during myocardial ischemia are probably different in patients who present both pain-free and painful myocardial ischemia, in patients with predominantly painless ischemia, and in diabetic patients.
Key Words: adenosine • angina • coronary disease • receptors
|
Causes of Ischemic Cardiac Pain |
|---|
|
TopAbstractCauses of Ischemic Cardiac...Angina Pectoris and Myocardial...Lack of Angina During...References |
|---|
At the turn of this century, Colbeck1 proposed that ischemic cardiac pain might be related to distension of the ventricular wall ("mechanical hypothesis"). Three decades later, Lewis2 hypothesized that ischemic pain might be elicited by the intramyocardial release of pain-producing substances induced by ischemia ("chemical hypothesis"). In the past few years, however, only a few clinical investigations have contributed to clarifying the causes of ischemic cardiac pain.
Mechanical Hypothesis
Davies et al3 showed that dilation of the ventricle
is unlikely to be responsible for angina, because the rate and the
magnitude of left ventricular dilation during
ergonovine-induced or spontaneous transient ischemic episodes
were found to be similar during painful and painless episodes. The
negligible importance of mechanical distortion and distension of
ventricular fibers in the genesis of ischemic
cardiac pain is further supported by the observation that
ventricular dilation, as it occurs during acute
ventricular failure, myocardial biopsy, or valvuloplasty,
does not cause any painful sensation.
Mechanical factors, however, may play a role in the activation of sensory receptors localized at the periarterial level.4 5 Indeed, Tomai et al6 recently found that during coronary angioplasty, for a similar degree of myocardial ischemia on the intracoronary ECG, pain severity was similar when two sequential balloon inflations were carried out at the same pressure, whereas it was greater during the second inflation when the latter was carried out at a higher pressure, thus suggesting that the mechanical distension of the coronary arterial wall can cause pain. This mechanism of cardiac pain may explain the localized chest pain frequently experienced by patients after successful stent implantation in the absence of myocardial ischemia.
Chemical Hypothesis: The Central Role of Adenosine
In the mid 1980s, the intravenous administration of
adenosine was introduced for the detection of coronary
artery disease during perfusion scintigraphy or during
two-dimensional echocardiography and for the
treatment of supraventricular reentry
tachycardia. Sylven et al7 observed that
during adenosine infusion, patients without evidence of
coronary artery disease often complained of a short-lasting
chest pain with features similar to those of ischemic cardiac
pain. Because adenosine is rapidly formed during myocardial
ischemia and released into the vascular bed,8 they
hypothesized that adenosine could be a mediator of
ischemic cardiac pain and tested this hypothesis by assessing
the effects of intravenous boluses of increasing doses of
adenosine in healthy volunteers. Adenosine
administration caused dose-dependent chest pain in all subjects;
furthermore, adenosine-induced pain was increased by
dipyridamole, which reduces adenosine cellular
uptake, and reduced by theophylline, which is a nonspecific
adenosine antagonist. Crea et al9
showed subsequently that in patients with chronic stable angina,
intracoronary infusion of adenosine
consistently caused pain with features identical to those
experienced during daily life episodes of transient myocardial
ischemia but without detectable signs of myocardial
ischemia. Infusion of a similar dose of adenosine into
the right atrium failed to elicit pain, thus proving that the pain
elicited by the intracoronary infusion of adenosine
originated from the heart.
Adenosine-induced cardiac pain is not secondary to myocardial ischemia, because it typically occurs in the absence of ischemialike ECG changes and can be elicited by adenosine infused into angiographically normal coronary branches and vascular beds, such as those supplied by the brachial or the femoral arteries, in which steal-induced ischemia cannot occur.9 10 11 12 Of note, the pain caused by adenosine does not appear to be related to the mechanical distension of periarteriolar nerve endings, because the infusion of nifedipine or papaverine, which produce a comparable degree of vasodilation, do not cause pain.13 Furthermore, adenosine causes pain at doses larger than those that provoke maximal vasodilation.9 In patients with exercise-induced angina, the severity of ischemic cardiac pain is significantly reduced by pretreatment with theophylline, a potent nonselective antagonist of adenosine P1 receptors, in the presence of a similar degree of myocardial ischemia, thus suggesting that endogenous adenosine is at least partially responsible for angina.9 Furthermore, theophylline reduces forearm ischemic pain,14 an effect that cannot be mediated by improvement of an adenosine-induced steal phenomenon.15 Taken together, these observations support the hypothesis that adenosine is an adequate stimulus for cardiac sensory receptors and that endogenous adenosine is a mediator, the first hitherto identified in humans, of cardiac and muscular ischemic pain.
Adenosine-induced pain does not appear to be influenced by ß-blockade, atropine, naloxone, nitroglycerin, nifedipine, clonidine, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, or steroids, whereas it is increased by systemic pretreatment with nicotine, probably because of a central modulation of pain perception.16 17 18 19 Recently, Gaspardone et al20 showed that in humans, the intra-arterial and intracoronary infusion of substance P, a polypeptide present in perivascular nerves and involved in the generation of neurogenic inflammation and in the mechanism of hyperalgesia, does not cause muscular or cardiac pain, yet it enhances adenosine-induced pain. This may help explain the extreme severity of cardiac ischemic pain frequently experienced by patients during myocardial infarction, when a large amount of substance P is probably released into the myocardium because of myocardial necrosis.
Receptors Responsible for Adenosine-Induced Pain
The cardiac effects of adenosine are due to the
stimulation of at least two subtypes (A1 and
A2) of surface membrane P1
receptors.21 22 23 The stimulation of A1
receptors, present in cardiomyocytes and perivascular
sympathetic nerves,23 24 causes
electrophysiological effects25
and inhibits the neuronal release of
catecholamines.23 The stimulation of
A2 receptors, present in endothelial
and vascular smooth muscle cells, causes coronary
vasodilation.26 27 28 29 Although adenosine-induced pain
might be mediated by both theophylline-sensitive A1 and
A2 receptors, early studies suggested that the effects of
adenosine on vascular tone and on pain generation are likely to
be mediated by different receptors. Indeed, monitoring of
coronary sinus blood oxygen saturation during
intracoronary infusion of adenosine revealed that the
doses that cause chest pain are higher than those that cause maximal
coronary dilation.9 13
The identification of the receptor subtype involved in the genesis of adenosine-induced pain has recently been tackled with bamiphylline. This analogue of theophylline has been successfully used to treat bronchial asthma and lung anaphylaxis in young children and infants and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adults with an efficacy comparable to that of theophylline but with substantially fewer side effects.30 31 32 33 34 In crude synaptic membranes prepared from rat brain, bamiphylline displaces radioligands from A1 adenosine receptors with a potency similar to that of 8-phenyltheophylline, whereas it shows a negligible potency on A2 adenosine receptors. This results in a high degree of A1 receptor selectivity, indicated by an A2/A1 Ki ratio of 596.35 In humans, Pappagallo et al36 reported that bamiphylline reduces the pain induced by intradermal injection of adenosine but not the A2 receptor–mediated adenosine-induced cutaneous hyperemia, thus suggesting that A1 receptors are involved in cutaneous nociception. Accordingly, Gaspardone et al37 recently found that the intravenous infusion of bamiphylline reduces adenosine-induced muscular and cardiac pain, yet it does not affect adenosine-induced coronary vasodilation. Similarly, it has recently been confirmed that N-0861 (N-6-endonorboran-2-yl-9-methyladenine), a selective A1 adenosine antagonist, at a dose that blocks A1-mediated electrophysiological but not A2-mediated vasodilatory adenosine effects, reduces the pain caused by intravenous administration of adenosine.38 Finally, in patients with exercise-induced angina, bamiphylline reduces the severity of angina normalized for the maximal ST-segment depression, thus suggesting that in humans, the effects of endogenous adenosine on pain generation are mediated primarily by A1 receptors.39
Electrophysiological Demonstration of
the Excitatory Effects of Adenosine on Afferent Nerves
The excitatory effects of adenosine on cardiac
afferent nerves first reported by Uchida et al40 have also
been demonstrated in cultured sensory neurons,41 in the
kidney,42 in the carotid sinus,43 44 and in
muscle.45 More recently, Montano et al46
found that the epicardial application of adenosine results in a
consistent activation of cardiac sympathetic afferent nerves
when their activity is recorded in the third thoracic ramus
communicans of the left sympathetic chain. Moreover, Dibner-Dunlap et
al47 showed that the A1 adenosine
agonist N-5-cyclopentyladenosine elicits a
dose-dependent sympathoexcitatory response
similar to that caused by adenosine, whereas the A2
adenosine agonist
5'-(N-cyclopropyl)carboxamidoadenosine fails to
elicit a sympathoexcitatory response, thus
suggesting that adenosine activates cardiac sympathetic
afferent fibers and leads to a
sympathoexcitatory response because of
activation of A1 adenosine receptors. These
observations are consistent with the early demonstration of
A1 receptors on cardiac afferent
neurons.48
Afferent Code for Ischemic Cardiac Pain
Recording of the electrical activity from cardiac afferent
nerves has shed some light on the nature of the receptors involved in
the production of cardiac pain. According to the "intensity
hypothesis,"49 pain is the result of excessive
stimulation of nonspecific sensory receptors, which also function as
chemoreceptors, mechanoreceptors, or polymodal receptors. According to
the "specificity hypothesis," pain is a result of the excitation
of a specific type of receptor that is stimulated only by noxious
stimuli (hence nociceptor).50 It is well known, for
instance, that on the somatic side there are receptors that appear to
be true nociceptors, because they exhibit no background discharge and
discharge only when stimulated by strong mechanical or thermal
stimuli.51 52 Conversely, on the visceral side, several
experimental studies, based on the recording of the electrical
activity from single-myelinated and
nonmyelinated cardiac sympathetic fibers under normal
hemodynamic conditions, have consistently shown
the presence of a background discharge. The background activity
increases during hemodynamic stress and often also
after chemical stimulation.53 54 55 The consistent
failure to identify fibers without background discharge is considered
an argument against the presence of specific visceral nociceptor
fibers.56 In fact, because nociceptors would serve only to
alert the body to a threat to tissue integrity, they should not have
background activity and should discharge only during potentially
damaging situations. Alternatively, it can be hypothesized that
specific pain receptors are so sparse that they have not been
identified in the experimental models used so far.
A modified version of the intensity hypothesis proposes that cardiac
pain would result from the extreme excitation of a spatially restricted
population of afferent fibers. By contrast, when the activation of the
afferent fibers is widely distributed, some central
inhibitory mechanisms may reduce or prevent
pain.56 57 58 However, the results of a recent study in
patients with chronic stable angina do not support this hypothesis. In
fact, increasing doses of adenosine were randomly infused into
the left anterior descending coronary artery both proximal to
the first diagonal branch and distal to the last diagonal branch. The
infusion of adenosine at the proximal coronary site
consistently caused pain that occurred earlier and was
significantly more severe than that experienced when adenosine
was infused at the distal coronary site.59 These
results indicate that the severity of adenosine-induced pain is
determined primarily by the number of pain receptors stimulated rather
than by the intensity of their stimulation above a certain threshold.
On the basis of present knowledge, it can be hypothesized that
cardiac pain is generated when tonically activated afferent
fibers are stimulated by substances capable of generating a specific
pattern of activation that is decoded by the central nervous system as
pain. Accordingly, in power spectral analysis of activity
generated by dorsal root ganglia cardiac neurons, at least one
adenosine-specific peak occurs at 
40 Hz.60
|
Angina Pectoris and Myocardial Ischemia |
|---|
|
TopAbstractCauses of Ischemic Cardiac...Angina Pectoris and Myocardial...Lack of Angina During...References |
|---|
Relations Between Angina and Severity, Duration, and Causes of Ischemia
Myocardial ischemia can manifest as a discomfort having various features or can remain totally silent.61 Painful ischemia is more easily recognized clinically when the pain has all the typical features initially described by Heberden.62 Painless ischemia has been described in all coronary syndromes, including stable angina,63 64 65 unstable and vasospastic angina,66 67 68 69 70 71 72 syndrome X,73 and myocardial infarction.74
The results obtained in patients with angina at rest during continuous ECG and hemodynamic monitoring led to the following conclusions: (1) Transient ischemic episodes lasting <3 minutes and causing an increase of left ventricular pressure <7 mm Hg are typically silent; (2) longer and/or more severe episodes can be either painful or silent even in the same patient; and (3) milder transient ischemic episodes are more likely to be silent than severe ones, although episodes so severe as to cause massive deficit of regional myocardial perfusion and even myocardial infarction can remain completely silent.75 Therefore, in patients with episodes of myocardial ischemia at rest, a critical duration and severity of ischemia is needed for the development of angina.
The causes of ischemia do not influence the features of angina. For instance, patients with chronic stable angina (caused by increased demand) usually have the same type of pain when they develop unstable angina or infarction (caused by thrombosis).61 Some patients with spasm superimposed on a fixed coronary stenosis experience the same type of ischemic cardiac pain during attacks of variant angina at rest with ST-segment elevation (indicative of coronary spasm) and during effort-induced angina with ST-segment depression in the same leads.61
Spatial Relations Between Angina and Ischemia
Location of cardiac pain in somatic regions is determined by the
convergence of visceral and somatic afferents on the same neurons in
the central nervous system.76 Cardiac pain is typically
located in the retrosternal region, but it is also frequently
experienced in the left hemithorax, in the left arm, in the
epigastrium, and in the neck. Less common locations are the right
hemithorax and the right arm. However, there is a great variability in
the location of cardiac pain among different patients.61 A
number of studies have shown that afferent sympathetic fibers are
responsible for the transmission of cardiac pain.57 77 78 79
Other studies have shown that afferent vagal fibers could also be
involved in the transmission of cardiac pain.80 It is
worth noting that intramyocardial nerve fibers run parallel to the
coronary artery branches.81 Furthermore,
experimental studies appear to suggest that afferent sympathetic fibers
would be preferentially located in the anterior cardiac wall, whereas
afferent vagal fibers would be preferentially located in the
inferior wall.82 83 84 Because of this spatial
organization of afferent fibers, ischemic pain originating from
different myocardial regions should have the potential to be
experienced in different somatic regions. Yet, Eriksson et
al85 and Pasceri et al86 found that patients
with anterior or inferior myocardial infarction have a
remarkably similar distribution of ischemic cardiac pain.
Unlike what was observed in patients with acute myocardial infarction,
Lichstein et al,87 who assessed cardiac pain distribution
in relation to the site of coronary occlusion during balloon
angioplasty, found a significant difference in the distribution of pain
during occlusion of the left anterior descending or the right
coronary artery. In their series of patients, left chest pain
had a <10% chance of being present during right coronary
artery occlusion, whereas epigastric pain radiating to the neck or jaw
had a <13% chance of being present during left anterior
descending coronary artery occlusion. The difference between
their results and those obtained in patients with acute myocardial
infarction85 86 is probably accounted for by the more
severe degree of ischemia in patients with myocardial
infarction, which is likely to result in a more extensive stimulation
of afferent fibers.
It is worth noting that sequential adenosine infusion into the
right or left coronary artery in the same patient resulted in a
similar distribution of pain in 75% of the patients, whereas pain
distribution was different in the remaining patients.10
Furthermore, Pasceri et al86 found that 12 of 18 patients
(67%) who had both anterior and inferior myocardial
infarction experienced cardiac ischemic pain in different body
regions, whereas the remaining 33% experienced pain in the same body
region.
Taken together, these findings indicate that the location of ischemic cardiac pain does not allow us to predict the site of myocardial ischemia; yet, in the same patient, different locations of cardiac ischemic pain are likely to be caused by ischemia in different myocardial regions.
Temporal Relations Between Angina and Ischemia
In patients who develop severe transient ischemia, such as
that caused by coronary spasm, angina typically follows the
onset of metabolic, contractile, and electric alterations
by several minutes.3 69 88 This is not the case, however,
for myocardial ischemia of lesser severity. Indeed, during
effort-induced subendocardial ischemia, some patients can
experience angina before the ischemic changes appear on the
surface ECG. This different sequence of events is even more pronounced
in patients with syndrome X, who frequently present with chest pain
in the absence of or before ischemialike ECG
changes.73 These different sequences of events may be in
relation to different mechanisms of ischemia in addition to a
different individual sensitivity to painful cardiac stimuli. Indeed,
during massive transmural ischemia, the deterioration of
myocardial function is very fast because of the accumulation of
anaerobic metabolites in the central core of the
ischemic region and lack of adequate compensatory
hypercontractility; thus, the first marker of
ischemia is an alteration of regional function. Instead, in
syndrome X, in which hypoperfusion is likely to occur in multiple tiny,
sparse regions within the myocardium, the impairment of
regional ventricular function can be very limited because
of both compensatory hypercontractility of adjacent
myocytes and more rapid washout of anaerobic metabolites
that impair ventricular function when they accumulate in
large ischemic regions. Hence, it may be difficult to detect
regional wall motion abnormalities with currently available techniques.
Conversely, the compensatory sustained release of adenosine may
be adequate to stimulate afferent fibers, thus causing pain, which may
be particularly severe in the presence of a generalized high
sensitivity to painful stimuli that is frequently observed in patients
with syndrome X.89
|
Lack of Angina During Myocardial Ischemia |
|---|
|
TopAbstractCauses of Ischemic Cardiac...Angina Pectoris and Myocardial...Lack of Angina During...References |
|---|
Lack of angina during myocardial ischemia can simply be due to the short duration and/or lesser severity of myocardial ischemia.75 When ischemia is long and severe enough, various mechanisms can account for the lack of pain. The causes of painless ischemia are probably different (1) in patients who present with both painless and painful myocardial ischemia, (2) in patients with predominantly painless ischemia, and (3) in diabetic patients.
Causes of Lack of Angina in Patients With Both Painful and
Painless Ischemia
In the majority of anginal patients, episodes of painful transient
myocardial ischemia can be followed during the same day, or
even hour, by episodes of similar duration and severity not accompanied
by chest pain. The nervous activity of afferent cardiac fibers is
modulated in intrinsic cardiac ganglia, in mediastinal ganglia, and in
thoracic ganglia (cardiac afferent fibers traveling in sympathetic
nerves) or in the nucleus of the solitary tract (cardiac afferent
fibers traveling in parasympathetic nerves). Then, they are further
modulated in the periaqueductal gray matter, in the hypothalamus, and
in the thalamus. Finally, they project bilaterally to the lateral
basal frontal (Brodmann area 47), mesial orbitofrontal (Brodmann area
10), and ventral cingulate cortices (Brodmann area 25), as recently
demonstrated in humans by positron emission tomography.90
Only when the nervous activity of afferent cardiac fibers generated by
myocardial ischemia reaches the cortex can it be decoded as a
painful sensation.
The response of the intrinsic cardiac ganglia is modified by both excitatory and inhibitory synapses. Indeed, substance P, bradykinin, oxytocin, acetylcholine, nicotine, adenosine, and ATP administered adjacent to in situ intrinsic cardiac neurons have been shown to modify the activity of intrinsic cardiac neurons.91 92 93 Similarly, the epicardial application of substance P and adenosine modifies the activity of dorsal root ganglia neurons.94 More importantly, Armour et al95 demonstrated that the epicardial application of substance P, bradykinin, adenosine, and ATP modifies the activity in nodose ganglion neurons for up to 45 minutes after their application. Of note, in a recent study, Sylven et al96 showed that the infusion of very low doses of adenosine may reduce the severity of exercise-induced angina. Thus, they proposed that adenosine is a neuromodulator that, depending on its concentration and local conditions, could on the one hand stimulate intramyocardial afferent nerves and on the other inhibit afferent impulses originating from the heart, perhaps at the site of cardiac intrinsic ganglia. Taken together, all these observations suggest that ischemic cardiac pain perception depends not only on the generation of a specific signal generated by myocardial ischemia but also on its modulation in intrinsic, mediastinal, and thoracic ganglia, the effect of which is influenced by, among other things, past events.
Further modulation of the nervous activity of afferent cardiac fibers generated by myocardial ischemia can also occur within the central nervous system at the spinal level, according to the gate control theory,97 or at the supraspinal level. However, after they reach the central nervous system, afferent neural impulses generated by myocardial ischemia travel together with other visceral and somatic afferent neural impulses in the spinothalamic tract; therefore, modulation at this level is unlikely to account for the selective inhibition of ischemic cardiac pain that takes place when episodes of transient ischemic episodes of similar duration and severity occur with and without angina in a short period of time.
Causes of Lack of Angina in Patients With Predominantly
Painless Ischemia
In patients who have never experienced angina even during
severe, prolonged ischemia and in those who have predominantly
silent ischemia, the failure to develop pain could be due to
psychological factors that persistently inhibit the perception of pain.
This is suggested by the generalized defective perception of painful
stimuli consistently demonstrated in this subset of patients.
Indeed, patients with totally silent ischemia and those with
predominantly silent ischemia have a significantly higher
threshold and tolerance for painful stimuli than patients with
predominantly painful ischemia when challenged with painful
stimuli, such as forearm ischemia, cold pressor, skin
electrical stimulation,98 99 intravenous
adenosine infusion,9 or dental pulp
stimulation.100 In addition, on a personality inventory
test, patients with silent ischemia recorded significantly
lower scores for nervousness and "excitability," higher scores
for "masculinity," and lower tendency to
complain.98
Endogenous opioids have received considerable attention in relation to the causes of silent ischemia. There are three main groups of endogenous opioids derived from three different precursor molecules: (1) endorphins, which are secreted predominantly by the pituitary gland; (2) enkephalins, secreted mainly by the adrenocortical gland; and (3) dynorphins, whose origin is still poorly known.101 102 103 Endogenous opioids appear to act centrally, provoking a selective suppression of nociceptive dorsal horn–convergent neurons.102 Accordingly, Van Rijn and Rabkin104 reported that naloxone, a potent endorphinergic antagonist, resulted in an earlier appearance of ischemic cardiac pain during treadmill exercise testing in patients with stable angina. However, other studies failed to initiate angina with naloxone in patients with silent myocardial ischemia.105 106 Also controversial are the results of studies in which plasma levels of endogenous endorphins were compared in patients with predominantly painful or painless ischemia.99 107 108 109 110
A common mechanism responsible for the presence of predominantly painless myocardial ischemia may be a selective impairment of the projection to the cortex of the nervous activity generated by myocardial ischemia. Accordingly, a recent study carried out in humans by positron emission tomography showed a much lower cortical activation during myocardial ischemia in patients with a history of painless ischemia than in patients who experienced angina.111
Causes of Lack of Angina in Diabetic Patients
Patients with diabetes mellitus have a higher incidence of
silent myocardial ischemia than nondiabetic
patients.112 Bradley and Partamian113 found
that 33 of 77 diabetic patients who died of acute myocardial infarction
had evidence of at least one healed infarction that was not related to
the patient's clinical history. Bradley and
Schoenfield114 described the presence and severity of
symptoms in 100 diabetic and 100 nondiabetic patients who
presented with myocardial infarction. The study revealed that
severe ischemic cardiac pain was nearly three times as frequent
among nondiabetic patients. Nesto et al115 compared the
results of exercise test in 50 diabetic and 50 nondiabetic patients. In
that study, angina was present in only 14 diabetic patients but in
34 nondiabetic patients, even though the degree of ST-segment
depression was similar in the two groups. The same authors found that
during Holter monitoring, only 5% of transient ischemic
episodes were accompanied by angina in diabetic patients. Finally,
Chiariello et al116 observed that among 51 diabetic
patients with ischemic heart disease, the prevalence of silent
episodes of ST-segment depression during Holter monitoring was higher
than that among 70 nondiabetic patients (35% versus 17%).
Autonomic neuropathy involving cardiac afferent nerves is the most likely explanation of the high incidence of silent ischemia in diabetic patients. In fact, in 5 diabetic patients who died of silent myocardial infarction, Fearman et al117 found that intramyocardial sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves exhibited morphological alterations of diabetic neuropathy characterized by beaded thickening within the nerves, spindle-shaped nerve fibers, fragmentation of nerve fibers, and a decrease in the actual number of neurons. In another study, Niakan et al118 investigated 73 consecutive diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy. He found ECG evidence of silent myocardial infarction in 5 of 25 patients (20%) with evidence of autonomic nervous system dysfunction but in only 2 of 48 patients (4%) without evidence of autonomic dysfunction. Of note, in a recent study, Caracciolo et al119 failed to find a higher prevalence of silent ischemia during exercise testing in 77 diabetic anginal patients compared with 481 nondiabetic anginal patients. The variable results of different studies may suggest that only a subset of patients with diabetes, probably those with autonomic neuropathy, present a higher prevalence of silent ischemia; hence, the differing results among different studies might be explained by the variable proportions of patients with autonomic neuropathy.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Reprint requests to Filippo Crea, Istituto di Cardiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go A. Gemelli, 8, Rome (Italy).
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractCauses of Ischemic Cardiac...Angina Pectoris and Myocardial...Lack of Angina During...References |
|---|
1. Colbeck EH. Angina pectoris: a criticism and a hypothesis. Lancet. 1903;1:793-795.
2.
Lewis T. Pain in muscular ischemia:
its relation to anginal pain. Arch Intern Med. 1932;49:713-727.
3.
Davies G, Bencivelli W, Chierchia S, Fragasso G,
Crea F, Crow J, Crean P, Pratt T, Morgan M, Maseri A. Sequence
and magnitude of ventricular volume changes in painful and
painless myocardial ischemia. Circulation. 1988;78:310-319.
4.
Sutton DC, Leuth HC. Experimental
production of pain on excitation of the heart and great
vessels. Arch Intern Med. 1930;45:827-867.
5. Malliani A, Lombardi F, Pagani M. Sensory innervation of the heart. In: Cervero F, Morrison JFB, eds. Visceral Sensations: Progress in Brain Research, vol 67. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 1986:39-48.
6. Tomai F, Crea F, Gaspardone A, Versaci F, Esposito C, Chiariello L, Gioffrè PA. Mechanisms of cardiac pain during coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1892-1896.[Abstract]
7. Sylven C, Beermann B, Jonzon B, Brandt R. Angina pectoris-like pain provoked by intravenous adenosine in healthy volunteers. Br Med J. 1986;293:227-230.
8. Haneda T, Ichihra K, Abiko Y, Onodera S. Release of adenosine and lactate from human hearts during atrial pacing in patients with ischemic heart disease. Clin Cardiol. 1989;12:76-82.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Crea F, Pupita G, Galassi AR, El-Tamimi H, Kaski JC,
Davies G, Maseri A. Role of adenosine in pathogenesis of
anginal pain. Circulation. 1990;81:164-172.
10.
Lagerqvist B, Sylven C, Beermann B, Helmius G,
Waldenstrom A. Intracoronary adenosine causes
angina pectoris like pain: an inquiry into the nature of visceral
pain. Cardiovasc Res. 1990;24:609-613.
11. Crea F, Gaspardone A, Kaski JC, Davies G, Maseri A. Relation between stimulation site of cardiac afferent nerves by adenosine and location of cardiac pain in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:1498-1504.[Abstract]
12. Sylven C, Jonzon B, Borg G, Fredholm BB, Kaijser L. Adenosine injection into the brachial artery produces ischemia-like pain or discomfort in the forearm. Cardiovasc Res. 1988;22:674-678.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Sylven C, Jonzon B, Edlund A. Angina pectoris
like pain provoked by iv bolus of adenosine: relationship to
coronary sinus blood flow, heart rate and blood pressure in
healthy volunteers. Eur Heart J. 1989;10:48-54.
14. Jonzon B, Sylven C, Kaijser L. Theophylline decreases pain in the ischemic forearm test. Cardiovasc Res. 1989;23:807-809.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Crea F, Galassi AR, Kaski JC, Davies G, Maseri A. Effect of theophylline on exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. Lancet. 1989;1:683-686.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Sylven C, Jonzon B, Brandt R, Beermann B.
Adenosine provoked angina pectoris-like pain: time
characteristics, influence of autonomic blockade and naloxone.
Eur Heart J. 1987;8:738-743.
17. Sylven C. Angina pectoris: clinical characteristics, neurophysiological and molecular mechanisms. Pain. 1989;36:145-167.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Sylven C, Beermann B, Kaijser L, Jonzon B. Nicotine enhances angina pectoris-like chest pain and atrioventricular blockade provoked by intravenous bolus of adenosine in healthy volunteers. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;16:962-965.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Sylven C. Mechanisms of pain in angina pectoris: a critical review of the adenosine hypothesis. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1993;7:745-759.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Gaspardone A, Crea F, Tomai F, Iamele M, Crossman D, Pappagallo M, Versaci F, Chiariello L, Gioffrè PA. Substance P potentiates the algogenic effects of the intra-arterial infusion of adenosine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:477-482.[Abstract]
21. van Calker D, Muller M, Hamprecht B. Adenosine regulates via two different types of receptors the accumulation of cyclic AMP in cultured brain cells. J Neurochem. 1979;33:999-1005.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Londos C, Cooper DMF, Wolff J. Subclasses of
external adenosine receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A. 1980;77:2551-2554.
23. Burnstock G. Vascular control by purines with emphasis on the coronary system. Eur Heart J. 1989;10:15-21.
24. Bohm M, Ungerer M, Erdmann E. Adenosine receptors in the human heart: pharmacological characterization in nondiseased and cardiomyopathic tissue. Drug Dev Res. 1993;28:268-276.
25.
Lerman BB, Belardinelli L. Cardiac
electrophysiology of adenosine. Circulation. 1991;83:1499-1509.
26. Belardinelli L. Adenosine system in the heart. Drug Dev Res. 1993;28:263-267.
27.
Kusachi S, Thompson RD, Olsson RA. Ligand
selectivity of dog coronary adenosine receptor
resembles that of adenylate cyclase stimulatory (Ra)
receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1983;227:316-321.
28. Leung E, Johnston CI, Woodcock EA. An investigation of the receptors involved in the coronary vasodilatory effect of adenosine analogues. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1985;12:515-519.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Schrader J, Kroll K, Henrich M, Piper HM. Coronary and myocardial adenosine receptors. Biomed Biochem Acta. 1987;46:S421-S426.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Dodion L, Aylward M. Metabolic and pharmacokinetic studies on bamiphylline: a review. Rev Inst Hygiene Mines. 1978;33:204-210.
31. Dodion L, Dusart P, Temmerman P. Study on the metabolism of bamiphylline in man. Arzneimittelforsch Drug Res. 1969;19:785-789.
32. Foutillan JP, Lefebvre MA, Ingrand I, Patte F, Boita F, Ouchni MM. Pharmacokinetic study of bamiphylline (and metabolites) in healthy volunteers using chromatography and mass spectrometry. Therapie. 1983;38:647-658.
33. Bongrani S, Razzetti R, Papotti M, Pastore F, Bergamaschi M. Lack of cardiostimulant effects of bamiphylline in in vitro and in vivo models. Arzneimittelforsch Drug Res. 1990;40:169-174.
34. Moret PR, Fournet PC, Boufas D. Propriétés hemodynamiques d'un nouveau dérivé de la theophylline: la bamiphylline. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1970;100:462-467.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Abbracchio MP, Cattabeni F. Selective activity of bamiphylline on adenosine A1-receptors in rat brain. Pharmacol Res Commun. 1987;19:537-545.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Pappagallo M, Gaspardone A, Tomai F, Iamele M, Crea F, Gioffrè PA. Analgesic effect of bamiphylline on pain induced by intradermal injection of adenosine. Pain. 1993;53:199-204.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Gaspardone A, Crea F, Tomai F, Versaci F, Iamele M, Gioffrè G, Chiariello L, Gioffrè PA. Muscular and cardiac adenosine-induced pain is mediated by A1 receptors. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:251-257.[Abstract]
38.
Bertolet BD, Belardinelli L, Franco EA, Nicholos WW,
Kerenski RA, Hill JA. Selective attenuation by N-0861
(N6-endonorboran-2-yl-9-methyladenine) of
cardiac A1 adenosine receptor–mediated effects in
humans. Circulation. 1996;93:1871-1876.
39.
Gaspardone A, Crea F, Iamele M, Tomai F, Versaci F,
Pellegrino A, Chiariello L, Gioffrè PA. Bamiphylline
improves exercise-induced myocardial ischemia through a novel
mechanism of action. Circulation. 1993;88:502-508.
40. Uchida Y, Kamisaka K, Ueda H. Responses of the cardiac sympathetic receptors to various substances. Jpn Heart J. 1969;10:225-242.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
MacDonald RL, Skerritt JH, Werz MA.
Adenosine agonists reduce voltage-dependent calcium conductance
of mouse sensory neurons in cell culture. J
Physiol. 1987;370:75-90.
42. Katholi RE, Hageman GR, Whinlow Woods WT. Hemodynamics and afferent renal nerve response to intrarenal adenosine in the dog. Hypertension. 1983;5(suppl 1):I-149-I-151.
43. McQueen DS, Ribeiro JA. Effects of adenosine on carotid chemoceptors activity in the cat. Br J Pharmacol. 1981;74:129-136.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Monteiro EC, Ribeiro JA. Ventilation effects of adenosine mediated by carotid baro-chemoceptors in the rat. Arch Pharmacol. 1987;35:143-148.
45.
Biagioni I, Costa F. Adenosine
activates afferent fibers in the forearm producing sympathetic
activation in humans. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993;267:1369-1375.
46. Montano N, Lombardi F, Ruscone TC, Conti M, Guazzi M, Malliani A. The excitatory effect of adenosine on the discharge activity of the afferent cardiac sympathetic fibers. Cardiologia. 1992;36:953-959.
47.
Dibner-Dunlap ME, Kinugawa T, Thames MD.
Activation of cardiac sympathetic afferents: effects of exogenous
adenosine and adenosine analogues.
Am J Physiol. 1993;265:H395-H400.
48. Middlekauff HR, Rivkees SA, Raybould HE, Sampogna S, Mayer EA. Localization of adenosine (A1) receptors to cardiac afferent neurons in adult rats. Circulation. 1995;92(suppl I):I-134. Abstract.
49. Noordenbos W. Pain. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 1959:254-265.
50. Perl ER. Is pain a specific sensation? J Psychiatric Res. 1971;8:273-287.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Burgess PR, Perl ER. Cutaneous mechanoreceptors and nociceptors. In: Iggo A, ed. Handbook of Sensory Physiology: Somatosensory System (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1973:29-78.
52.
Malliani A, Recordati G, Schwartz PJ.
Nervous activity of afferent cardiac sympathetic fibers with atrial and
ventricular endings. J Physiol. 1973;229:457-469.
53.
Lombardi F, Della Bella P, Casati R, Malliani
A. Effects of intracoronary administration of bradykinin
on the impulse activity of afferent sympathetic
unmyelinated fibers with left ventricular
endings in the cat. Circ Res. 1981;48:69-75.
54. Montano N, Lombardi F, Gnecchi-Ruscone T, Contini M, Guazzi M, Malliani A. Effetto eccitatorio dell'adenosina sull'attività di scarica delle fibre afferenti cardiache. Cardiologia. 1992;36:953-959.
55. Montano N, Gnecchi-Ruscone T, Lombardi F, Malliani A. Excitatory effect of adenosine on cardiac sympathetic afferent fibers. In: Belardinelli L, Pelleg A, eds. Adenosine and Adenine Nucleotide: From Molecular Biology to Integrative Physiology. Boston, Mass: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995:307-314.
56.
Malliani A. The elusive link between transient
myocardial ischemia and pain. Circulation. 1986;73:201-204.
57. Malliani A. Cardiovascular sympathetic afferent fibres. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 1982;94:11-74.
58. Malliani A, Pagani M, Lombardi F. Visceral versus somatic mechanisms. In: Wall PD, Melzack R, eds. Textbook of Pain. 2nd ed. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 1989:128-140.
59. Gaspardone A, Crea F, Versaci F, Tomai F, Iamele M, De Fazio A, Perino M, De Fazio A, Chiariello L, Gioffrè PA. Algogenic effect of intracoronary infusion of adenosine at different coronary sites. Circulation. 1996;94(suppl I):I-571. Abstract.
60. Sylven C, Crea F. Mechanism of anginal pain: the key role of adenosine. In: Belardinelli L, Pelleg A, eds. Adenosine and Adenine Nucleotide: From Molecular Biology to Integrative Physiology. Boston, Mass: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995:315-325.
61. Maseri A, Crea F, Kaski JC, Davies G. Mechanisms and significance of cardiac ischemic pain. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1992;35:1-18.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
62. Heberden W. Some account of a disorder of the breast. Med Trans. 1972;2:59-67.
63. Schang SJ, Pepine CJ. Transient asymptomatic ST segment depression during daily activity. Am J Cardiol. 1977;39:396-402.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
64. Rozanski A, Bairey CN, Krantz DS, Friedman J, Resser KJ, Morell M, Hilton-Chalfen S, Hestrin L, Bietendorf J, Berman DS. Mental stress and the induction of silent myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:1005-1012.[Abstract]
65. Deanfield JE, Shea M, Ribiero P, de Landsheere CM, Wilson RA, Horlock P, Selwyn AP. Transient ST-segment depression as a marker of myocardial ischemia during daily life. Am J Cardiol. 1984;54:1195-1200.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
66.
Guazzi M, Fiorentini C, Polese A, Magrini F.
Continuous electrocardiographic recording in Prinzmetal's
variant angina pectoris: a report of four cases. Br
Heart J. 1970;32:611-616.
67.
Guazzi M, Magrini F, Fiorentini C, Polese A.
Clinical, electrocardiographic and hemodynamic effects
of long-term use of propranolol in Prinzmetal's variant
angina pectoris. Br Heart J. 1971;33:889-894.
68. Chierchia S, Marchesi C, Maseri A. Evidence of angina not caused by increased myocardial metabolic demand and pattern of electrocardiographic and hemodynamic alterations during `primary' angina. In: Maseri A, Klassen GA, Lesch M, eds. Primary and Secondary Angina Pectoris. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton; 1978:145-153.
69.
Chierchia S, Brunelli C, Simonetti I, Lazzari M,
Maseri A. Sequence of events in angina at rest: primary
reduction in coronary flow. Circulation. 1980;61:759-768.
70. Biagini A, Mazzei MG, Carpeggiani C, Testa R, Antonelli R, Maseri A. Vasospastic ischemic mechanism of frequent asymptomatic transient ST-T changes during continuous electrocardiographic monitoring in selected unstable angina patients. Am Heart J. 1982;103:13-20.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
71. Gottlieb SO, Weisfeldt ML, Ouyang P, Mellits ED, Gerstenblith G. Silent ischemia as a marker for early unfavorable outcomes in patients with unstable angina. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1214-1219.[Abstract]
72.
Maseri A, Parodi O, Severi S, Pesola A.
Transient transmural reduction of myocardial blood flow, demonstrated
by thallium-201 scintigraphy, as a cause of variant
angina. Circulation. 1976;54:280-287.
73. Kaski JC, Crea F, Nihoyannopoulos P, Maseri A. Transient myocardial ischemia during daily life in patients with syndrome X. Am J Cardiol. 1986;58:1242-1247.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
74. Kannel WB. Incidence, precursors and prognosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction. In: Kellermann JJ, Braunwald E, eds. Silent Myocardial Ischemia: A Critical Appraisal, vol 37. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 1990:202-214.
75. Chierchia S, Lazzari M, Freedman B, Brunelli C, Maseri A. Impairment of myocardial perfusion and function during painless myocardial ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983;1:924-930.[Abstract]
76.
Blair RW, Weber RN, Foreman RD.
Characteristics of primate spinothalamic tract neurons
receiving viscerosomatic convergent inputs in T3-T5 segments.
J Neurophysiol. 1981;46:797-811.
77. Hillarp NA. Peripheral autonomic mechanisms. In: Field J, Braunwald E, eds. Handbook of Physiology, Section 1. Washington, DC: American Physiology Society; 1960:979-1006.
78.
Brown AM. Excitation of afferent cardiac
sympathetic nerve fibers during myocardial ischemia.
J Physiol. 1967;190:35-53.
79. Meller ST, Gebhart GF. A critical review of the afferent pathways and the potential chemical mediators involved in cardiac pain. Neuroscience. 1992;48:501-524.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
80. Meller ST, Lewis SJ, Ness TJ, Brody MJ, Gebhart GF. Vagal afferent-mediated inhibition of a nociceptive reflex by intravenous serotonin in the rat, I: characterization. Brain Res. 1990;524:90-100.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
81.
Randall WC, Szentiuryi M, Pace JB, Wechsler JS, Kaye
MP. Patterns of sympathetic nerve projections onto the
canine heart. Circ Res. 1968;22:315-323.
82. Weaver LC, Danos LM, Oehl RS, Meckler RL. Contrasting reflex influences of cardiac afferent nerves during coronary occlusion. Am J Physiol. 1981;240:H620-H629.
83. Inoue H, Zipes DP. Increased afferent vagal responses produced by epicardial application of nicotine on the canine posterior left ventricle. Am Heart J. 1987;114:757-764.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
84. Kositskii GI, Mikhailova SD, Semushkina TM. Unit activity of the ganglion nodosum in myocardial ischemia. Bull Exp Med Biol. 1985;98:1622-1624.
85. Eriksson B, Vuorisalo D, Sylven C. Diagnostic potential of chest pain characteristics in coronary care. J Intern Med. 1994;235:473-478.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
86. Pasceri V, Cianflone D, Finocchiaro ML, Crea F, Maseri A. Relation between myocardial infarction site and pain location in Q wave acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:224-230.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
87. Lichstein E, Breitbart S, Shani J, Hollander G, Greengart A. Relationship between location of chest pain and site of coronary artery occlusion. Am Heart J. 1988;115:564-568.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
88. Gallino A, Chierchia S, Smith G, Croom M, Morgan M, Marchesi C, Maseri A. Computer system for analysis of ST segment changes on 24 hour Holter monitor tapes: comparison with other available systems. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984;4:245-252.[Abstract]
89. Maseri A, Crea F, Kaski JC, Crake T. Mechanisms of angina pectoris in syndrome X. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:499-506.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
90. Rosen SD, Paulesu E, Frith CD, Frackowiac RS, Davies GJ, Jones T, Camici PG. Central nervous pathways mediating angina pectoris. Lancet. 1994;344:147-150.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
91.
Armour JA, Hopkins DA. Activity of in vivo
canine ventricular neurons. Am J
Physiol. 1990;258:H326-H336.
92.
Huang MH, Smith FM, Armour JA. Amino acids
modify the activity of canine intrinsic cardiac neurons involved in
cardiac regulation. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:H1275-H1282.
93. Huang MH, Sylven C, Smith FM, Pelleg F. Modulation of in situ canine intrinsic cardiac neuronal activity by locally applied adenosine, ATP or analogs. Am J Physiol. 1993;265:H914-H922.
94. Huang MH, Sylven C, Horackova M, Armour JA. Ventricular sensory neurons in canine dorsal root ganglia: effects of adenosine and substance P. Am J Physiol. 1995;269:H318-H324.
95.
Armour JA, Huang MH, Pelleg A, Sylven C.
Responsiveness of in situ canine model ganglion afferent neurons to
epicardial mechanical or chemical stimuli. Cardiovasc
Res. 1994;28:1218-1225.
96. Sylven C, Eriksson B, Jenson J, Geignt E, Hallin RG. Analgesic effects of adenosine during exercise-provoked myocardial ischemia. Neuroreport. 1996;7:1-5.
97.
Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new
theory. Science. 1965;150:971-979.
98. Droste C, Roskamm H. Experimental pain measurements in patients with asymptomatic myocardial ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983;1:940-945.[Abstract]
99. Glazier JJ, Chierchia S, Brown M, Maseri A. Importance of generalized defective perception of painful stimuli as a cause of silent myocardial ischemia in chronic stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1986;58:667-672.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
100. Falcone C, Sconocchia R, Guasti L, Codega S, Montemartini C, Specchia G. Dental pain threshold and angina pectoris in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:348-352.[Abstract]
101. Akil H, Madden J, Patrick RL. Stress-induced increase in endogenous opiate peptides: concurrent analgesia and its partial reversal by naloxone. In: Kosterlitz HW, ed. Opiates and Endogenous Opioid Peptides. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 1976:63-70.
102. Basbaum A, Fields H. Endogenous pain control systems: brainstem spinal pathways and endorphin circuitry. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1984;7:309-338.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
103. Mayer DJ, Watkins LR. Multiple endogenous opiate and nonopiate analgesia systems. In: Kruger L, Liebeskind JC, eds. Advances in Pain Research and Therapy, vol 6. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1984:523-576.
104. Van Rijn, Rabkin SW. Effect of naloxolone on exercise-induced angina pectoris: a randomized double blind crossover trial. Life Sci. 1981;38:609-615.
105. Ellestad MH, Kuan P. Naloxone and asymptomatic ischemia: failure to induce angina during exercise testing. Am J Cardiol. 1984;54:982-984.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
106. Droste C, Meyer-Blankenburg H, Greenlee MW. Effect of physical exercise on pain thresholds and plasma beta-endorphins in patients with silent and symptomatic myocardial ischemia. Eur Heart J. 1988;9(suppl N):25-33.
107. Falcone C, Specchia G, Rondanelli R, Guasti L, Corsico G, Codega S, Montemartini C. Correlation between beta-endorphin plasma levels and anginal symptoms in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:719-723.[Abstract]
108. Perna G, Stanislao M, Salvatori MP. Basal plasma beta-endorphin and beta-lipotropin in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic myocardial ischemia. Cardiologia. 1988;33:765-769.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
109. Opasich C, Cobelli F, Farilla C. Silent ischaemia in post-myocardial infarction patients submitted to physical training. Eur Heart J. 1988;9(suppl N):22-27.
110. Meisenberg G, Simmons WH. Peptides and the blood brain barrier. Life Sci. 1983;32:2611-2623.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
111.
Rosen SD, Paulesu E, Nihoyannopoulos P,
Tousoulis D, Frackowiak RJJ, Frith CD, Jones T, Camici PG.
Silent ischemia as a central problem: regional brain activation
compared in silent and painful myocardial ischemia.
Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:939-949.
112. Kannel WB, Abbott RD. Incidence and prognosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction: an update on the Framingham Study. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:1144-1147.[Abstract]
113. Bradley RF, Partamian JO. Coronary heart disease in the diabetic patient. Med Clin North Am. 1963;78:1093-1104.
114. Bradley RF, Schoenfield SJ. Diminished pain in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction. Geriatrics. 1962;17:322-326.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
115. Nesto RW, Phillips RT, Kett KG, Hill T, Perper E, Young E, Leland OS Jr. Angina and exertional myocardial ischemia in diabetic and nondiabetic patients: assessment by exercise thallium scintigraphy. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:170-175.
116. Chiariello M, Indolfi C, Cotecchia MR, Sifola C, Romano M, Condorelli M. Asymptomatic transient ST changes during ambulatory ECG monitoring in diabetic patients. Am Heart J. 1985;110:529-534.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
117. Fearman I, Faccio E, Melei J, Numez R, Jedzinsky M, Fox D, Rappaport M. Autonomic neuropathy and painless myocardial infarction in diabetic patients: histologic evidence of their relationships. Diabetes. 1977;26:1147-1158.[Abstract]
118. Niakan E, Harati Y, Rolak L, Comstock J, Rokey R. Silent myocardial infarction and diabetic cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy. Arch Intern Med. 1986;146:2222-2230.
119.
Caracciolo EA, Chaitman BR, Forman SA, Stone PH,
Bourassa MG, Sopko G, Nancy LG, Conti CR. Diabetics with
coronary artery disease have a prevalence of
asymptomatic ischemia during exercise treadmill
testing and ambulatory ischemia monitoring similar to that of
nondiabetic patients: an ACIP database study.
Circulation. 1996;93:2097-2105.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  F. Crea, P. G. Camici, R. De Caterina, and G. A. Lanza CHAPTER 17 Chronic Ischaemic Heart Disease ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. E. Hofkamp, C. A. Henrikson, and S. T. Wegener An Interactive Model of Pain and Myocardial Ischemia Psychosom Med, September 1, 2007; 69(7): 632 - 639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. A. Gwirtz, J. Dickey, D. Vick, M. A. Williams, and B. Foresman Viscerosomatic interaction induced by myocardial ischemia in conscious dogs J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2007; 103(2): 511 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. F. Beltrame Advances in understanding the mechanisms of angina pectoris in cardiac syndrome X Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2005; 26(10): 946 - 948. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. C. Stanley Myocardial Energy Metabolism During Ischemia and the Mechanisms of Metabolic Therapies Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2004; 9(1_suppl): S31 - S45. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. N. Chavez, W. C. Stanley, T. A. McElfresh, H. Huang, J. P. Sterk, and M. P. Chandler Effect of hyperglycemia and fatty acid oxidation inhibition during aerobic conditions and demand-induced ischemia Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2003; 284(5): H1521 - H1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Mannheimer, P. Camici, M.R. Chester, A. Collins, M. DeJongste, T. Eliasson, F. Follath, I. Hellemans, J. Herlitz, T. Luscher, et al. The problem of chronic refractory angina. Report from the ESC Joint Study Group on the Treatment of Refractory Angina Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2002; 23(5): 355 - 370. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Cinca and A. Rodriguez-Sinovas Cardiovascular reflex responses induced by epicardial chemoreceptor stimulation Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2000; 45(1): 163 - 171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Gaspardone, F. Crea, F. Tomai, F. Versaci, A. Pellegrino, L. Chiariello, and P. A. Gioffre Effect of acetylsalicylate on cardiac and muscular pain induced by intracoronary and intra-arterial infusion of bradykinin in humans J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 1999; 34(1): 216 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. S. Sheps, R. P. McMahon, K. C. Light, W. Maixner, C. J. Pepine, J. D. Cohen, A. D. Goldberg, R. Bonsall, R. Carney, P. H. Stone, et al. Low hot pain threshold predicts shorter time to exercise-induced angina: results from the psychophysiological investigations of myocardial ischemia (PIMI) study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 1999; 33(7): 1855 - 1862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||