Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1997;96:3450-3458

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mortara, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tavazzi, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mortara, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tavazzi, L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Failure

(Circulation. 1997;96:3450-3458.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Arterial Baroreflex Modulation of Heart Rate in Chronic Heart Failure

Clinical and Hemodynamic Correlates and Prognostic Implications

Andrea Mortara, MD, FESC; Maria Teresa La Rovere, MD, FESC; Gian Domenico Pinna, BE; Alexander Prpa, MD; Roberto Maestri, BE; Oreste Febo, MD; Massimo Pozzoli, MD, FESC; Cristina Opasich, MD; ; Luigi Tavazzi, MD, FESC

From the Division of Cardiology, Centro Medico di Montescano, "S Maugeri" Foundation, IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.

Correspondence to Andrea Mortara, Division of Cardiology, Centro Medico di Montescano, "S Maugeri" Foundation, IRCCS, Montescano, Pavia, Italy.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background In chronic heart failure (CHF), arterial baroreflex regulation of cardiac function is impaired, leading to a reduction in the tonic restraining influence on the sympathetic nervous system. Because baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), as assessed by the phenylephrine technique, significantly contributes to postinfarction risk stratification, the aim of the present study was to evaluate whether in CHF patients a depressed BRS is associated with a worse clinical hemodynamic status and unfavorable outcome.

Methods and Results BRS was assessed in 282 CHF patients in sinus rhythm receiving stable medical therapy (age, 52±9 years; New York Heart Association [NYHA] class, 2.4±0.6; left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], 23±6%). The BRS of the entire population averaged 3.9±4.0 ms/mm Hg (mean±SD) and was significantly related to LVEF and hemodynamic parameters (LVEF, P<.005; cardiac index and pulmonary wedge pressure, P<.001 by regression analysis). Patients in NYHA classes III or IV and those with severe mitral regurgitation had markedly depressed vagal reflexes. The association of BRS with survival was described after its categorization in three groups: below the lowest quartile (<1.3 ms/mm Hg), between the lowest quartile and the median (1.3 to 3 ms/mm Hg), and above the median (>3 ms/mm Hg). During a mean follow-up of 15±12 months, 78 primary events (cardiac death, nonfatal cardiac arrest, and status 1 priority transplantation) occurred (27.6%). BRS was significantly related to outcome (log rank, 9.1; P<.01), with a relative risk of 2.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.6 to 4.7) for patients with the major derangement in BRS (<1.3 ms/mm Hg). At multivariate analysis, BRS was an independent predictor of death after adjustment for noninvasive known risk factors but not when hemodynamic indexes were also considered. In CHF patients with severe mitral regurgitation, however, BRS remained a strong prognostic marker independent of hemodynamic function.

Conclusions In moderate to severe CHF, a depressed sensitivity of vagal reflexes parallels the deterioration of clinical and hemodynamic status and is significantly associated with poor survival. Particularly in patients with severe mitral regurgitation the baroreceptor modulation of heart rate provides prognostic information of incremental value to hemodynamic parameters.


Key Words: heart failure • baroreceptors • nervous system, autonomic • prognosis • hemodynamics


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Sinoaortic and cardiopulmonary baroreceptors normally exercise a restraining influence on resting central sympathetic activity. In CHF patients, these normal tonic inhibitory reflexes are depressed, contributing to sympathetic excitation.1–3 Baroreflex abnormalities in CHF have been reported both in experimental and human studies4–8 in association with a prolonged exposure to low cardiac output and reduced blood pressure. The exact mechanism of this baroreceptor dysfunction is still uncertain,1–3,9–11 but independent of the causal mechanisms, it has been shown to be reversible after optimization of medical treatment or after cardiac transplantation.7,8

BRS may be safely quantified by the phenylephrine method in normal subjects and in patients with cardiac diseases,12 and it has been proposed as a valid index of the capability to reflexly increase parasympathetic activity.13 In patients with a recent MI, a decreased BRS has been regarded as a powerful marker of poor prognosis.14–16 No prognostic data have been reported in CHF patients by this technique, and only limited experience with the neck suction method has been described.17

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate in a large population of CHF patients whether clinical and hemodynamic parameters correlate with BRS and whether baroreceptor function is significantly associated with poor survival.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Population
Of 434 consecutive patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and moderate to severe heart failure admitted from November 1992 to March 1996 to the Heart Failure Unit of Montescano Medical Center for evaluation of possible heart transplantation, 354 were in sinus rhythm and were considered for BRS assessment. All patients had to have LVEF <40% and to have had at least one episode of severe cardiac decompensation in the preceding 6 months. Fourteen patients were excluded because of refractory decompensation, and 24 others were excluded because of frequent arrhythmias or pacemaker rhythm. Thirteen patients were also excluded because their cardiomyopathy was not idiopathic, ischemic, or valvular (restrictive, n=6; hypertrophic, n=4; congenital, n=3). Patients were studied in a stable condition with no changes in signs or symptoms in the 2 weeks preceding the study. The final study population consisted of 303 patients. They all gave informed consent to participate in the study, which had been approved by the local Ethical Committee.

Study Protocol and Follow-up Data
Instrumental assessments were performed on hospitalized stable patients at the time of the entry visit and every 6 months, whereas clinical data were obtained every 3 months during visits to our outpatient heart failure clinic.

The prespecified end point was cardiac death, nonfatal cardiac arrest resulting from documented ventricular fibrillation, or status 1 transplant priority. Status 1 patients were defined as those requiring an intensive care unit admission and prolonged inotropic or mechanical cardiovascular support for irreversible pump failure, fatal unless heart transplant is performed. Arrhythmic deaths were not considered separately because in most cases they were not documented arrhythmic deaths, and the available data do not allow us to distinguish between tachyarrhythmic and bradyarrhythmic events. Only one event was considered for each patient, and any event occurring after the initial event was not considered. Patients who underwent elective heart transplantation were considered censored at the date of the transplantation; data on surviving patients were censored at the last day they were known to be alive, and data on deaths from other causes were censored on the date of death.

BRS Assessment
Arterial baroreceptor function was evaluated by administration of the vasoactive drug phenylephrine as previously described.14,18 BRS studies were analyzed by two independent and experienced observers (A.M. and M.T.L.R.). Heart rate and SAP obtained either directly from the radial/brachial artery or noninvasively by Finapres (Ohmeda) were continuously recorded. The invasive and noninvasive methods provide highly correlated BRS values.19,20 Phenylephrine (3 to 4 µg/kg IV) was given to raise the SAP by 15 to 30 mm Hg by at least three bolus injection. If blood pressure did not increase as desired, additional injections were made, with the dose of phenylephrine increased by 50 µg. The RR intervals were plotted against the preceding arterial systolic peak, and a linear regression analysis was performed for those points included between the beginning and the end of the first significant increase in SAP. Regression lines with a statistically significant correlation coefficient (P<.05) were accepted for analysis; only for BRS near zero (± 0.5 ms/mm Hg), if the increase of SAP was adequate (above 15 mm Hg), were the coefficients of regression accepted independent of the probability value. Indeed, if SAP increase causes no reflex changes (or little erratic changes) of RR interval, the correlation between {Delta}values of SAP and RR is obviously poor, with a regression line running along the horizontal axis. The final slope obtained by calculating the mean value of the injections performed at the optimal phenylephrine dose was considered as representing BRS (millisecond of RR change per 1 mm Hg of SAP increase). Examples of poor and sensitive BRS are reported in Fig 1ADown and 1BDown.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Examples of patients with poor (A) and sensitive (B) BRS. Top, For both A and B, beat-to-beat changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (dotted line) and in RR intervals (solid line) compared with baseline values are reported. Analysis is limited to the first major increase in blood pressure with the attendant changes in RR interval (points included between dotted lines). These points are used (bottom) for calculation of the regression line. In patient A, the increase in SBP was accompanied by a modest increase in RR interval, thus resulting in a depressed BRS, whereas in patient B, a marked increase in RR interval was observed. SBP indicates systolic blood pressure.

Hemodynamic and Doppler Echocardiographic Evaluation
Catheterization of the right –side of the heart was performed by use of a 7F Swan-Gantz balloon-tipped catheter inserted into the right internal jugular vein and advanced through the right heart into the pulmonary artery. Baseline standard hemodynamic measurements, including pulmonary artery pressure, PWP, and right atrial pressure, were made with the patients in the supine position by use of a Hewlett Packard transducer connected with a 7005 Marquette polygraph and recorded on a polygraph at a speed of 50 mm/sec on a scale calibrated from 0 to 80 mm Hg. Cardiac output was measured by the thermodilution method as the mean of three consecutive measurements not varying by >10%.

A Hewlett Packard 1500 ultrasound system with 2.5- and 3.5-MHz probes was used to perform Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiographic examinations, which were obtained with the patients lying in a supine or slightly left lateral decubitus position. Examinations were recorded on a super-VHS videotape and analyzed by an experienced cardiologist. Left ventricular volumes and LVEF were assessed by two-dimensional apical two- and four-chamber views by use of the modified Simpson's rule. Mitral regurgitation was diagnosed and semiquantitatively graded by color-flow Doppler from the apical view.21

Statistical Analysis
Results are given as mean±SD. ANOVA with post hoc comparison with Scheffé's procedure for continuous variables and {chi}2 test for categorical variables were applied. Because of the skewed distribution of BRS, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA were used when appropriate; Spearman's rank correlation procedure was used to determine the correlation of BRS with continuous clinical variables. Statistical significance was defined at the P<.05 level.

The association of BRS with mortality was described after its categorization according to the following cutoff values: below the lowest quartile (<1.3 ms/mm Hg), between the lowest quartile and the median value (1.3 to 3 ms/mm Hg), and above the median (>3 ms/mm Hg). Tricotomization of the variables used to predict risk is an established procedure, especially when dealing with continuous variables of still-undefined prognostic value.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to describe the survival of patients stratified according to the levels of the categorical variable, and the log-rank test was used for statistical comparison. BRS as a categorical variable and other clinical hemodynamic parameters were tested with the Cox proportional hazards analyses to identify correlates of out-of-hospital outcome, and the association between BRS and mortality was expressed as relative risk with 95% confidence intervals. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the independent effects of BRS on survival after adjustment for the variables significantly associated with mortality in our CHF patients. These covariates were all continuous variables except for NYHA functional class, which was dichotomized into class I or II and class III or IV, and mitral regurgitation, which was tricotomized as absent or moderate (1 to 2+) and severe (3 to 4+). Multivariate analysis was applied in two steps: first, the association between BRS and survival was assessed after adjustment for those parameters that are easily detectable in clinical practice; then, that association was assessed for the same variables plus the hemodynamic parameters. Similar sets of analyses (ie, BRS in univariate analysis and after adjustment for significant covariates) were performed for prespecified subgroups of patients according to cause of heart failure (ischemic versus idiopathic), NYHA class (I or II versus class III or IV), and mitral regurgitation (absent/moderate versus severe). The analyses were performed by use of SAS statistical software.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The clinical characteristics of the population are reported in Table 1Down.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Baseline Clinical and Hemodynamic Characteristics

BRS and Clinical and Hemodynamic Correlates
BRS was determinable in 282 of 303 CHF patients (93%), and the mean value was 3.9±4.0 ms/mm Hg (median, 3; range, -7 to 21 ms/mm Hg). No adverse effects were observed during or after the phenylephrine injections. In 11 patients, SAP did not increase adequately (<15 mm Hg) despite a high dose of phenylephrine (>10 µg/kg), whereas in 10 subjects, an erratic behavior of SAP and heart rate was observed.

No difference was found in heart rate response to phenylephrine between ischemic (n=142) and idiopathic (n=128) cardiomyopathy (3.9±3.6 versus 4.0±4.5 ms/mm Hg); BRS was significantly associated with symptoms of heart failure (Fig 2Down), and as a continuous variable, it was weakly related to LVEF (r=.20, P<.005; Fig 3ADown), cardiac index (r=.30, P<.001), and PWP (r=-.29, P<.001; Fig 3BDown). BRS was also significantly more depressed in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (Fig 4Down).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Relation between symptoms as expressed by NYHA class (Cl.) and BRS (ms/mm Hg). Patients in NYHA class III or IV had a significantly more depressed BRS compared with patients in NYHA class I or II.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Linear relation between BRS and LVEF (A) and PWP (B). Note that although significant, the relation between BRS and both indexes is rather weak.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Relation between BRS and severity of mitral regurgitation. Mitral regurgitation was diagnosed and semiquantitatively graded by color-flow Doppler in terms of absent, moderate (1 to 2+), and severe (3 to 4+). BRS was markedly lower in patients with severe mitral regurgitation.

Table 2Down compares clinical and hemodynamic characteristics of the patients according to BRS categorization. A significant trend is present for all variables when moving from a relatively preserved to a more depressed BRS, suggesting an association between severity of heart failure and baroreflex function. BRS was also related to age, when considered as both a continuous (r=-.33, P<.0001) or a categorized variable (see Table 2Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Differences in Clinical and Hemodynamic Characteristics According to BRS Categorized Into Three Levels

In 22 patients, a paradoxical tachycardia to baroreceptor stimulation occurred, and consequently a negative estimate of BRS was obtained (mean, -1.8±1.7 ms/mm Hg; range, -7 to -0.1 ms/mm Hg). Compared with patients with positive BRS, these patients exhibited a worse clinical status, higher PWP, and a higher incidence of severe mitral regurgitation (Table 3Down). Baseline RR interval and SAP before BRS assessment were also reduced in patients with negative BRS (Table 3Down). In Fig 5Down, an example of negative BRS is reported before and after optimization of medical therapy when a significant reduction of PWP and mitral regurgitation is associated with a less tachycardic response to blood pressure increase.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Clinical and Hemodynamic Characteristics According to Positive or Negative BRS



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Examples of BRS assessment in a patients with severe mitral regurgitation (A) and after optimization of medical therapy with low-dose ß-blocker and increased diuretics (B); the treatment was associated with an increase in cardiac index (from 1.90 to 2.60 L · min-1 · m-2) and reductions in PWP (from 30 to 11 mm Hg) and mitral regurgitation (from 3+ to 1+). See Fig 1Up for panel description. At the first assessment, the increase in SBP was accompanied by a paradoxical tachycardia with calculation of a negative BRS; after hemodynamic improvement, the reflex RR interval response was still modest but clearly toward a bradycardia with a calculated BRS of 1.0 ms/mm Hg.

Mortality Data and Survival Analysis
Mean duration of follow-up was 15±12 months (median, 12 months). Of the 282 patients with assessed BRS, 53 died of cardiac causes (20.5%), 5 had nonfatal cardiac arrest, and 20 were transplanted in status 1 priority. Of the 53 deaths, 15 were sudden and 38 were due to progressive pump failure. The end-point cardiac death, nonfatal cardiac arrest, and status 1 priority occurred in 78 patients (27.6%). Thirty-six patients (12.7%) underwent elective cardiac transplantation without status 1 priority.

Fig 6Down shows the 2-year survival curves according to BRS values. Mortality was higher among patients with BRS <1.3 ms/mm Hg than in patients with more preserved BRS (58% versus 27%, P<.002), thus establishing the prognostic value of this autonomic marker. Table 4Down summarizes the univariate relative risk for depressed BRS and the multivariate results of Cox analysis after adjustment for the covariates that are significantly associated with mortality in this CHF population (Table 5Down). BRS remained statistically significant after adjustment for NYHA, LVEF, baseline RR interval and maximum VO2 but not when hemodynamic data were also entered into the model (Table 4Down).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the considered end point (cardiac death, nonfatal cardiac arrest, status 1 transplant priority) according to BRS stratified at three cutoff values: below the 25th percentile (BRS <1.3 ms/mm Hg), from the 25th percentile to the median value (BRS 1.3 to 3.0 ms/mm Hg), and above the median (BRS >3.0 ms/mm Hg). The probability value refers to differences in events rate between subgroups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Prediction of Cardiac Mortality by BRS With Cox Regression Analysis Before and After Adjustment for Clinical and Hemodynamic Covariates


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Univariate Association With Mortality of Clinical and Hemodynamic Variables

Univariate and multivariate relations with mortality (ie, BRS alone and after adjustment for significant covariates) were performed for subgroups of patients according to cause of heart failure (ischemic versus idiopathic, valvular excluded), NYHA class I or II versus class III or IV, and absent/moderate versus severe mitral regurgitation (Table 6Down). Although secondary analyses should be considered with caution because the number of events decreases in each subgroup of patients, we found that BRS seems to perform better as a prognostic marker in ischemic rather than in idiopathic cardiomyopathy (adjusted RR, 2.0 versus 0.6); nevertheless, it was not independently related to better survival in any subset of patients with the exclusion of severe mitral regurgitation (3 to 4+). In these subjects, a reduced heart rate response to phenylephrine-induced increase of blood pressure emerged as an important determinant of survival.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Subgroup Analyses: Prediction of Cardiac Mortality by BRS With Cox Regression Analysis Before and After Adjustment for Clinical and Hemodynamic Covariates


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Our study in a large group of patients with stable CHF shows that arterial BRS is markedly depressed in CHF, and although it clearly parallels the deterioration of clinical and hemodynamic status, the relation with all indexes of ventricular function is weak, suggesting that other factors are important in its determination.

As in post-MI patients, it was found that a depressed BRS, assessed by the phenylephrine technique, is significantly associated with poor survival, and its quantification adds prognostic information to the predictive accuracy of the other established risk factors such as age, LVEF, and maximum O2 consumption during exercise. When hemodynamic variables are considered, however, only in those patients with depressed ventricular function and severe mitral regurgitation, a blunted reflex heart rate response, or even a paradoxical tachycardia to blood pressure increase did it appear as a powerful and independent marker of cardiac mortality.

Arterial Baroreflex Assessment in Heart Failure
BRS as measured by reflex heart rate response to pharmacologically induced elevation of arterial pressure has been reported to be reduced in different cardiac diseases,6,22,23 including heart failure,6,7 and our results are concordant with these data. Because the bradycardia that occurs in response to the hypertensive stimulus is mediated largely by increased parasympathetic tone,24 the phenylephrine test is considered a safe and valid technique to quantify the ability of cardiovascular regulatory system to increase vagal activity.12 However, it has been shown that changes in sympathetic activity may interfere with the ability to increase vagal activity1,12,25; as a consequence, a depressed BRS is likely to be secondary to either a decrease in parasympathetic activity or an increase in sympathetic activity.

In CHF, the mechanism of arterial baroreflex dysfunction is probably multifactorial and may be located in all components of the reflex arc.1,5,9,26,27 Moreover, activation of the renin-angiotensin system in heart failure by increased plasma levels of angiotensin II may act on baroreflex control of sympathetic activity and heart rate both directly in the vasomotor and cardiac centers in the brain and in the peripheral nerve terminals, facilitating norepinephrine release and inhibiting acetylcholine release.11 CHF patients may also have abnormalities of sinus node responsiveness to changes in efferent traffic to the heart.4

This study was not designed to confirm or reject any of the possible mechanisms involved in baroreceptor dysfunction of CHF patients, but it highlights in a large CHF population that the depression of the capability to reflexly decrease heart rate follows the severity of ventricular dysfunction as expressed by both clinical symptoms and hemodynamic parameters. However, the association between BRS and LVEF or hemodynamic parameters, although evident and statistically significant, is rather weak, suggesting that BRS is not merely dependent on the hemodynamic status and that other mechanisms, as reported above, are probably involved.

Admittedly, in patients with more severe CHF and in those with severe mitral regurgitation, the modest increase in blood pressure induced by phenylephrine is often accompanied by a paradoxical tachycardia (negative BRS). Although sympathostimulatory reflexes by stretch of cardiac chambers after the phenylephrine-induced increase of afterload or a direct ß-adrenergic stimulation at sinus node level by high doses of the drug28 can play a role, it is likely that the observed paradoxical tachycardia is caused by a further hemodynamic impairment accompanied by an uncompensated increase in mitral regurgitation. This is supported by the observation that BRS may be restored by hemodynamic improvement and reduction of severity of mitral regurgitation (see the example in Fig 4Up). The net effect of this mechanism is a reduction in amplitude and rate of increase in stroke volume despite a drug-related increase in peripheral resistances. These new findings open up the possibility of reconsidering the phenylephrine test in CHF; it is suggested that this method, particularly in patients with severe ventricular dysfunction and mitral regurgitation, should be regarded not as a probe to evaluate the "pure" baroreceptors function but as a test to assess the capability of baroreceptors to evoke an increase in parasympathetic drive in the context of the patient's actual hemodynamic status. This may represent an advantage of the phenylephrine method because any measure of "pure" arterial baroreceptor function (such as that obtained by mechanical stimulation of the carotid baroreceptors) may not have any clinical usefulness and prognostic implication if in real life the vagal stimulation of baroreflexes by an increase in blood pressure (ie, during emotional stress, or transient ischemia) is limited by the hemodynamic impairment and by the increase of mitral regurgitation that ultimately prevails, causing tachycardia and further sympathetic activation.

BRS and Cardiac Mortality in Heart Failure
The possibility of using BRS as a prognostic indicator in patients with CHF stems directly from the compelling experimental and clinical evidence that has accumulated over the last 20 years about the importance of autonomic markers in risk stratification after MI. In a well-known animal model combining previous MI, acute ischemia, and sympathetic hyperactivity, the quantitative estimation of baroreflex function was inversely related to the risk of developing ventricular fibrillation, and the animals at risk could be identified in advance by the presence of depressed BRS.29 These observations were confirmed by small studies in post-MI patients14,15 and more recently by the multicenter study ATRAMI.16,30 The results of this study and particularly the finding that when a depressed BRS (<3 ms/mm Hg) was associated with an LVEF <35%, the relative risk increased markedly for both cardiac deaths16 and arrhythmic events30 support the rationale of testing the same hypothesis even in stable CHF patients. Moreover, in post-MI patients, BRS appeared to predict not only sudden death but also total cardiac mortality.12,14,16 These data suggest that at a clinical level, the impairment in vagal reflexes, as a measure of both a decrease in parasympathetic activity and an increase in sympathetic activity, may act not only to facilitate the substrate for life-threatening arrhythmias (as in animals model) but also to facilitate other pathological substrates leading to cardiac events (ventricular remodeling, platelet aggregability, and coronary vasoconstriction).

Data on prognostic implications of BRS are more scanty in CHF. Osterziel et al17 in a small number of stable patients (n=35) observed that BRS, as obtained by a modified neck-chamber technique, was lower in patients who died compared with survivors (1.3±0.2 versus 2.1±0.4 ms/mm Hg, P<.02); however, depressed BRS (<1.5 ms/mm Hg) was significantly associated with higher mortality only in univariate analysis but not in multivariate analysis.

When the same technique that was used in post-MI patients was used in a large group of stable sinus rhythm patients with moderate to severe heart failure, our study shows that BRS may contribute to identifying patients at higher risk of death. Indeed, it is noteworthy that in a noninvasive multivariate model including NYHA class, maximum oxygen consumption during exercise, LVEF, and baseline 24-hour mean heart period, BRS still has an independent prognostic content, which is no longer evident when PWP and cardiac index are also considered. This observation suggests that analysis of vagal reflexes may be a useful test to be added for stratification purposes in CHF, particularly when only a simple routine approach is available.

For certain subgroups of CHF patients, BRS analysis may give new and important information. We found that in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, the test is more informative that in idiopathic cardiomyopathy, and this is concordant with the previous experiences in post-MI ventricular dysfunction.14–16 However, the most relevant finding was observed in patients with severe mitral regurgitation in whom the possibility of reducing heart rate in response to blood pressure increase was significantly and independently associated with cardiac mortality even if hemodynamic parameters are considered. These last data confirm the considerations reported above on the possible role of the phenylephrine test in CHF patients, particularly when severe mitral regurgitation is present. Indeed, it is likely that this method, by quantifying the neural and hemodynamic capability to reflexly increase parasympathetic tone, provides in these patients a sensible indicator of the intrinsic neural and hemodynamic "reserve" of the system in response to a provocative stimulus. In agreement with this hypothesis, BRS may represent an important marker of poor survival independent of baseline hemodynamic data.

Study Limitations
A possible limitation of our study is that in our patients, we did not study the whole heart rate response to deactivation and activation of arterial baroreflexes by also assessing the reflex heart period shortening induced by intravenous bolus injection of nitroglycerin.31 This was deliberately not performed for two important reasons: First, it has been documented that the relation between arterial pressure and heart rate is sigmoidal with linear and saturation regions and that BRS is a measure of the slope in the linear portion of this curve.32 However, CHF patients are likely to be in a saturation and no-longer-linear portion of this curve characterized by low arterial pressure and high sympathetic drive.33 This implies a physiological limit to evoking further sympathetic activation and the calculation of an only apparently reduced BRS. Second, the hemodynamic response to nitroprusside infusion in CHF is an important confounder of BRS assessment because the induced reduction of the drug of peripheral resistances causes a beneficial increase in stroke volume and cardiac output that deactivates arterial baroreflexes, leading to bradycardia and not, as expected, to the shortening of heart period.34

Drugs can also be included among factors that may have affected our data. In CHF patients, a pharmacological influence on sympathovagal balance cannot be excluded, specifically in patients treated with ACE inhibitors, ß-blockers, or digoxin.1,3 However, the clinical status of our patients would allow only changes in or withdrawal of drug therapy at the expense of losing the "steady condition" that may be considered the "natural" status of patients with severe heart failure, particularly when dealing with prognostic indicators.

In conclusion, this study shows that arterial baroreflex modulation of heart rate may be safely quantified by the phenylephrine technique, even in patients with mild to severe heart failure. It is suggested, however, that in CHF this method can be an indicator of both neural and hemodynamic capability to reflexly increase parasympathetic activity. Because it has been clearly demonstrated that these reflexes are protective, the hypothesis was that their quantification may provide clinical and prognostic implications. Indeed, we found that arterial baroreflex modulation of heart rate is clearly more depressed in the advanced stages of the disease and that this depression is significantly associated with higher incidence of cardiac death. The prognostic power of BRS appears relevant and independent of other known risk factors such as hemodynamic data, particularly in the subsets of patients with ventricular dysfunction and severe mitral regurgitation.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
BRS = baroreflex sensitivity
CHF = chronic heart failure
LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction
MI = myocardial infarction
NHYA = New York Heart Association
PWP = pulmonary wedge pressure
SAP = systolic arterial pressure

Received March 31, 1997; revision received July 29, 1997; accepted August 5, 1997.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Eckberg DL, Sleight P. Congestive heart failure. In: Eckberg DL, Sleight P, eds. Human Baroreflexes in Health and Disease. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press; 1992:399–436.

2. Shepherd JT. Heart failure: role of cardiovascular reflexes. Cardioscience. 1990;1:7–12.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Thames MD, Kinugawa T, Smith ML, Dibner-Dunlap ME. Abnormalities of baroreflex control in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22A:56A–60A.

4. White CW. Abnormalities in baroreflex control of heart rate in canine heart failure. Am J Physiol. 1981;240:H793–H799.

5. Wang W, Chen J-S, Zucker IH. Carotid sinus baroreceptor sensitivity in experimental heart failure. Circulation. 1990;81:1959–1966.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Eckberg DL, Drabinsky M, Braunwald E. Defective cardiac parasympathetic control in patients with heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1971;285:877–883.

7. Ellenbogen KA, Mohanty PK, Szentpetery S, Thames MD. Arterial baroreflex abnormalities in heart failure: reversal after orthotopic cardiac transplantation. Circulation. 1989;79:51–58.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Marin-Neto JA, Pintya AO, Gallo L Jr, Maciel BC. Abnormal baroreflex control of heart rate in decompensated congestive heart failure and reversal after compensation. Am J Cardiol. 1991;67:604–610.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Dibner-Dunlap ME, Thames MD. Baroreflex control of renal sympathetic nerve activity is preserved in heart failure despite reduced arterial baroreceptor sensitivity. Circ Res. 1989;65:1526–1535.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Sopher SM, Smith ML, Eckberg DL, Fritsch JM, Dibner-Dunlap ME. Autonomic pathophysiology in heart failure: carotid baroreceptor-cardiac reflexes. Am J Physiol. 1990;259:H689–H696.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Townend JN, Al-Ani M, West JN, Littler WA, Coote JH. Modulation of cardiac autonomic control in humans by angiotensin II. Hypertension. 1995;25:1270–1275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. La Rovere MT, Mortara A, Schwartz PJ. Baroreflex sensitivity. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1995;6:761–774.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Levy MN, and Schwartz PJ, eds. Vagal control of the heart: experimental basis and clinical implications. Armonk, NY: Futura Publishing Co; 1994:644.

14. La Rovere MT, Specchia G, Mortara A, Schwartz PJ. Baroreflex sensitivity, clinical correlates and cardiovascular mortality among patients with a first myocardial infarction: a prospective study. Circulation. 1988;78:816–824.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Farrell TG, Odemuyiwa O, Bashir Y, Cripps TR, Malik M, Ward E, Camm AJ. Prognostic value of baroreflex sensitivity testing after acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J. 1992;67:129–137.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. La Rovere MT, Mortara A, Bigger JT Jr, Marcus FI, Camm JA, Hohnloser SH, Schwartz PJ, for the ATRAMI Investigators. The prognostic value of baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability after myocardial infarction: the ATRAMI study. Circulation. 1996;94(suppl I):I-19. Abstract.

17. Osterziel KJ, Hanlein D, Willenbrock R, Eichhorn C, Luft E, Dietz R. Baroreflex sensitivity and cardiovascular mortality in patients with mild to moderate heart failure. Br Heart J. 1995;73:517–522.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Mortara A, Specchia G, La Rovere MT, Bigger JT Jr, Marcus FI, Camm JA, Hohnloser SH, Nohara R, Schwartz PJ, on behalf of the ATRAMI Investigators. Patency of infarct-related artery: effect of restoration of anterograde flow on vagal reflexes. Circulation. 1996;93:1114–1122.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Hartikainen JE, Tahvanainen KUO, Mantysaari MJ, Tikkanen PE, Lansimies EO, Airaksinen KEJ. Simultaneous invasive and noninvasive evaluations of baroreflex sensitivity with bolus phenylephrine technique. Am Heart J. 1995;130:296–301.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. La Rovere MT, Mortara A, Pinna GD, Malik M, Bloonfield D, Aliot E, Schwartz PJ, for the ATRAMI Investigators. Quantification of baroreflex sensitivity by FINAPRES in patients after myocardial infarction: the ATRAMI experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:470A. Abstract.

21. Miyatake K, Izumi S, Okamoto M, Kinoshita N, Asonuma H, Nakagawa H, Yamamoto K, Takamiya M, Sakakibara H, Nimura Y. Semiquantitative grading of severity of mitral regurgitation by real time two dimensional Doppler flow imaging technique. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;7:82–88.[Abstract]

22. Bristow JD, Honour AJ, Pickering GW, Sleight P, Smyth HS. Diminished baroreflex sensitivity in high blood pressure. Circulation. 1969;39:48–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Schwartz PJ, Zaza A, Pala M, Locati E, Beria G, Zanchetti A. Baroreflex sensitivity and its evolution during the first year after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:629–636.[Abstract]

24. Pickering TG, Gribbin B, Petersen ES, Cunningham DJC, Sleight P. Effects of autonomic blockade on the baroreflexes in man at rest and during exercise. Circ Res. 1972;30:175–185.

25. Hedman AE, Tahvanainen KUO, Hartikainen JEK, Hakumäki MOK. Effect of sympathetic modulation and sympatho-vagal interaction on heart rate variability in anaesthetized dogs. Acta Physiol Scand. 1995;155:205–214.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Niebauer M, Zucker IH. Static and dynamic responses of carotid sinus baroreceptors in dogs with chronic volume overload. J Physiol (Lond). 1985;369:295–310.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Porter TR, Eckberg DL, Fritsch JM, Rea RF, Beightol LA, Schmedyje JF Jr, Mohanty PK. Autonomic pathophysiology in heart failure patients. J Clin Invest. 1990;85:1362–1371.

28. James TN, Bear ES, Lang KF, Green EW, Winkler HH. Adrenergic mechanisms in the sinus node. Arch Intern Med. 1970;125:513–547.

29. Schwartz PJ, Vanoli E, Stramba-Badiale M, De Ferrari GM, Billman GE, Foreman RD. Autonomic mechanisms and sudden death: new insights from analysis of baroreceptor reflexes in conscious dogs with and without a myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1988;78:969–979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. La Rovere MT, Mortara A, Bigger JT Jr, Marcus FI, Malik M, Nohara R, Schwartz PJ, Camm JA, Hohnloser SH, for the ATRAMI Investigators. Prognostic value of autonomic markers on life-threatening arrhythmic events after acute myocardial infarction: results from the ATRAMI study. Circulation. 1996;94(suppl I):I-625. Abstract.

31. Mancia G, Mark AL. Arterial baroreflexes in humans. In: Shepherd JT, Abboud FM, eds. Handbook of Physiology. Section 3: The Cardiovascular System. Bethesda, Md: American Physiological Society; 1983:755–794.

32. Kirchheim HR. Systemic arterial baroreceptor reflexes. Physiol Rev. 1976;56:100–176.[Free Full Text]

33. Dibner-Dunlap M. Arterial or cardiopulmonary baroreflex control of sympathetic nerve activity in heart failure? Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:1640–1642.

34. Marin-Neto JA, Maciel BC, Gallo L Jr, Manco JC, Terra JF, Amorin DS. Effect of lowering left atrial pressure on arterial baroreflex control of heart rate in patients with congestive heart failure. In: Sleight P, ed. Arterial Baroreceptor and Hypertension. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1980:499–509.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. G. J. Gademan, R. J. van Bommel, C. J. W. Borleffs, S. Man, J. C. W. Haest, M. J. Schalij, E. E. van der Wall, J. J. Bax, and C. A. Swenne
Biventricular pacing-induced acute response in baroreflex sensitivity has predictive value for midterm response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2009; 297(1): H233 - H237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Giannoni, M. Emdin, F. Bramanti, G. Iudice, D. P. Francis, A. Barsotti, M. Piepoli, and C. Passino
Combined increased chemosensitivity to hypoxia and hypercapnia as a prognosticator in heart failure.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 26, 2009; 53(21): 1975 - 1980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. T. May, B. D. Horne, J. F. Carlquist, X. Sheng, E. Joy, and A. P. Catinella
Depression After Coronary Artery Disease Is Associated With Heart Failure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 21, 2009; 53(16): 1440 - 1447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
J. P. Fisher, S. Ogoh, C. Junor, A. Khaja, M. Northrup, and P. J. Fadel
Spontaneous baroreflex measures are unable to detect age-related impairments in cardiac baroreflex function during dynamic exercise in humans
Exp Physiol, April 1, 2009; 94(4): 447 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Sykora, J. Diedler, A. Rupp, P. Turcani, and T. Steiner
Impaired Baroreceptor Reflex Sensitivity in Acute Stroke Is Associated With Insular Involvement, But Not With Carotid Atherosclerosis
Stroke, March 1, 2009; 40(3): 737 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
G. Deley, R. D. Lipman, J. P. Kannam, C. Bartolini, and J. A. Taylor
Stress responses and baroreflex function in coronary disease
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2009; 106(2): 576 - 581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. T. La Rovere, G. D. Pinna, R. Maestri, E. Robbi, A. Caporotondi, G. Guazzotti, P. Sleight, and O. Febo
Prognostic implications of baroreflex sensitivity in heart failure patients in the beta-blocking era.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 13, 2009; 53(2): 193 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
F. Iellamo, M. Pagani, and M. Volterrani
Cardiac Rehabilitation and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Role for Autonomic Cardiovascular Regulation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 23, 2008; 52(13): 1105 - 1105.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
P. J. Schwartz, G. M. De Ferrari, A. Sanzo, M. Landolina, R. Rordorf, C. Raineri, C. Campana, M. Revera, N. Ajmone-Marsan, L. Tavazzi, et al.
Long term vagal stimulation in patients with advanced heart failure First experience in man
Eur J Heart Fail, September 1, 2008; 10(9): 884 - 891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. G. J. Gademan, R. J. van Bommel, C. Ypenburg, J. C. W. Haest, M. J. Schalij, E. E. van der Wall, J. J. Bax, and C. A. Swenne
Biventricular pacing in chronic heart failure acutely facilitates the arterial baroreflex
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2008; 295(2): H755 - H760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
A. J. Grippo, J. A. Moffitt, and A. K. Johnson
Evaluation of Baroreceptor Reflex Function in the Chronic Mild Stress Rodent Model of Depression
Psychosom Med, May 1, 2008; 70(4): 435 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
M. T. La Rovere, G. D. Pinna, R. Maestri, E. Robbi, A. Mortara, F. Fanfulla, O. Febo, and P. Sleight
Clinical relevance of short-term day-time breathing disorders in chronic heart failure patients
Eur J Heart Fail, September 1, 2007; 9(9): 949 - 954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
F. Iellamo, J. A. Sala-Mercado, M. Ichinose, R. L. Hammond, M. Pallante, T. Ichinose, L. W. Stephenson, and D. S. O'Leary
Spontaneous baroreflex control of heart rate during exercise and muscle metaboreflex activation in heart failure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): H1929 - H1936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
C. Berteotti, V. Asti, V. Ferrari, C. Franzini, P. Lenzi, G. Zoccoli, and A. Silvani
Central and baroreflex control of heart period during the wake-sleep cycle in spontaneously hypertensive rats
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): R293 - R298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A.-J. Liu, X.-J. Ma, F.-M. Shen, J.-G. Liu, H. Chen, and D.-F. Su
Arterial Baroreflex: A Novel Target for Preventing Stroke in Rat Hypertension
Stroke, June 1, 2007; 38(6): 1916 - 1923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
S. Ryan, S. Ward, C. Heneghan, and W. T. McNicholas
Predictors of Decreased Spontaneous Baroreflex Sensitivity in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome
Chest, April 1, 2007; 131(4): 1100 - 1107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Floras and A. Bagai
Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and the Post-Infarct Patient: A Recipe for Baroreflex Health?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 17, 2006; 48(8): 1607 - 1609.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J J Remmen, R W M M Jansen, W R M Aengevaeren, M A Brouwer, and F W A Verheugt
Prognostic implications of the blood pressure response to the Valsalva manoeuvre in elderly cardiac patients.
Heart, September 1, 2006; 92(9): 1327 - 1328.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
F. Iellamo, A. Galante, J. M. Legramante, M. E. Lippi, C. Condoluci, G. Albertini, and M. Volterrani
Altered autonomic cardiac regulation in individuals with Down syndrome
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): H2387 - H2391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. D. Pinna, R. Maestri, S. Capomolla, O. Febo, E. Robbi, F. Cobelli, and M. T. La Rovere
Applicability and Clinical Relevance of the Transfer Function Method in the Assessment of Baroreflex Sensitivity in Heart Failure Patients
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 4, 2005; 46(7): 1314 - 1321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
T. Kubo, J. D. Parker, E. R. Azevedo, D. J. Atchison, G. E. Newton, P. Picton, and J. S. Floras
Vagal heart rate responses to chronic beta-blockade in human heart failure relate to cardiac norepinephrine spillover
Eur J Heart Fail, August 1, 2005; 7(5): 878 - 881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
M P Frenneaux
Autonomic changes in patients with heart failure and in post-myocardial infarction patients
Heart, November 1, 2004; 90(11): 1248 - 1255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
I. Fietze, D. Romberg, M. Glos, S. Endres, H. Theres, C. Witt, and V. K. Somers
Effects of positive-pressure ventilation on the spontaneous baroreflex in healthy subjects
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2004; 96(3): 1155 - 1160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. D. Lipman, J. K. Salisbury, and J. A. Taylor
Spontaneous Indices Are Inconsistent With Arterial Baroreflex Gain
Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 481 - 487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A S Androne, K Hryniewicz, R Goldsmith, A Arwady, and S D Katz
Acetylcholinesterase inhibition with pyridostigmine improves heart rate recovery after maximal exercise in patients with chronic heart failure
Heart, August 1, 2003; 89(8): 854 - 858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
G. Piccirillo, M. Nocco, A. Moise, M. Lionetti, C. Naso, S. di Carlo, and V. Marigliano
Influence of Vitamin C on Baroreflex Sensitivity in Chronic Heart Failure
Hypertension, June 1, 2003; 41(6): 1240 - 1245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
J.-W. G. Meijer, E. Bosma, J. D. Lefrandt, T. P. Links, A. J. Smit, R. E. Stewart, J. H. van der Hoeven, and K. Hoogenberg
Clinical Diagnosis of Diabetic Polyneuropathy With the Diabetic Neuropathy Symptom and Diabetic Neuropathy Examination Scores
Diabetes Care, March 1, 2003; 26(3): 697 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
L. Mangin, A. Monti, and C. Medigue
Cardiorespiratory system dynamics in chronic heart failure
Eur J Heart Fail, October 1, 2002; 4(5): 617 - 625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. R. Bonsignore, G. Parati, G. Insalaco, O. Marrone, P. Castiglioni, S. Romano, M. Di Rienzo, G. Mancia, and G. Bonsignore
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Improves Baroreflex Control of Heart Rate during Sleep in Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 2002; 166(3): 279 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. Pietila, K. Malminiemi, R. Vesalainen, T. Jartti, M. Teras, K. Nagren, P. Lehikoinen, and L.-M. Voipio-Pulkki
Exercise Training in Chronic Heart Failure: Beneficial Effects on Cardiac 11C-Hydroxyephedrine PET, Autonomic Nervous Control, and Ventricular Repolarization
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2002; 43(6): 773 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. Bernardi, C. Porta, L. Spicuzza, J. Bellwon, G. Spadacini, A. W. Frey, L. Y.C. Yeung, J. E. Sanderson, R. Pedretti, and R. Tramarin
Slow Breathing Increases Arterial Baroreflex Sensitivity in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
Circulation, January 15, 2002; 105(2): 143 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. P. Ponikowski, T. P. Chua, D. P. Francis, A. Capucci, A. J.S. Coats, and M. F. Piepoli
Muscle Ergoreceptor Overactivity Reflects Deterioration in Clinical Status and Cardiorespiratory Reflex Control in Chronic Heart Failure
Circulation, November 6, 2001; 104(19): 2324 - 2330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Ponikowski, T. P. Chua, S. D. Anker, D. P. Francis, W. Doehner, W. Banasiak, P. A. Poole-Wilson, M. F. Piepoli, and A. J.S. Coats
Peripheral Chemoreceptor Hypersensitivity: An Ominous Sign in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
Circulation, July 31, 2001; 104(5): 544 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
L. Mangin, A. Monti, C. Medigue, I. Macquin-Mavier, M.-E. Lopes, P. Gueret, A. Castaigne, B. Swynghedauw, and P. Mansier
Altered baroreflex gain during voluntary breathing in chronic heart failure
Eur J Heart Fail, March 1, 2001; 3(2): 189 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. Kardos, G. Watterich, R. de Menezes, M. Csanady, B. Casadei, and L. Rudas
Determinants of Spontaneous Baroreflex Sensitivity in a Healthy Working Population
Hypertension, March 1, 2001; 37(3): 911 - 916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Ponikowski, D. P. Francis, M. F. Piepoli, L. C. Davies, T. P. Chua, C. H. Davos, V. Florea, W. Banasiak, P. A. Poole-Wilson, A. J. S. Coats, et al.
Enhanced Ventilatory Response to Exercise in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Preserved Exercise Tolerance : Marker of Abnormal Cardiorespiratory Reflex Control and Predictor of Poor Prognosis
Circulation, February 20, 2001; 103(7): 967 - 972.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Mortara, M. T. La Rovere, G. D. Pinna, R. Maestri, S. Capomolla, and F. Cobelli
Nonselective beta-adrenergic blocking agent, carvedilol, improves arterial baroflex gain and heart rate variability in patients with stable chronic heart failure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2000; 36(5): 1612 - 1618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J Hoffmann, W Grimm, V Menz, H-H Müller, and B Maisch
Heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy
Heart, May 1, 2000; 83(5): 531 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. P. Fauvel, C. Cerutti, P. Quelin, M. Laville, M. P. Gustin, C. Z. Paultre, and M. Ducher
Mental Stress-Induced Increase in Blood Pressure Is Not Related to Baroreflex Sensitivity in Middle-Aged Healthy Men
Hypertension, April 1, 2000; 35(4): 887 - 891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
C. Rostagno, G. Galanti, M. Felici, M. Maccherini, G. Sani, S. Caciolli, and G. F. Gensini
Prognostic value of baroreflex sensitivity assessed by phase IV of Valsalva manoeuvre in patients with mild-to-moderate heart failure
Eur J Heart Fail, March 1, 2000; 2(1): 41 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
D.P. Francis, W. Shamim, L.C. Davies, M.F. Piepoli, P. Ponikowski, S.D. Anker, and A.J.S. Coats
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for prognosis in chronic heart failure: continuous and independent prognostic value from VE/VCO2slope and peak VO2
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2000; 21(2): 154 - 161.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Ponikowski, M. Piepoli, T.P. Chua, W. Banasiak, D. Francis, S.D. Anker, and A.J.S. Coats
The impact of cachexia on cardiorespiratory reflex control in chronic heart failure
Eur. Heart J., November 2, 1999; 20(22): 1667 - 1675.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mortara, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tavazzi, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mortara, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tavazzi, L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Failure